Fiscal Year 1986 AN F 'kVo - I TE S A" FY 1986 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS ITEM APPROPRIATIONS ($ Millions) Navigation .............................. Flood Control Total ........................ Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries' .......... Multipurpose, including power .............. Beach Erosion Control ..................... Total New Work 2 .......................... O ther W ork' ............................. T O T A L .. ............ .. . ........ NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)* Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports ..................... Foreign, Great Lakes Ports ................. Domestic, Coastal Ilntraterritory not compiled) Domestic, Great Lakes ............. ....... . Dom estic, Inland ......................... D om estic, Local ........................... T O T A L ................................ Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign Coastal Ports ...................... Foreign Great Lakes Ports .................. Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory ......... Domestic, Great Lakes ..................... Dom estic. Inland .......................... Domestic, Local ............................ TOTAL ................................ FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) ... FLOOD DAMAGES SUSTAINED (S Billions) ..... POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) ......... Generated (Billions of kwh) .................. RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) A ll Purposes . . ................. .... .. ..... Flood Control (Maximum) .... . ..... W ater Supply ............................... Irrigation .............................. PUBLIC ATTI'ENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS (Millions of visitor days, calendar years) ........ ' Included in Flood Control Total 2 Advance engineering and design, and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippage applied to projects. ' Operation and maintenance, surveys, adminiustration and misc. programs and activities. ' Includes New Melones and Snettisham, built by the Corps and operated by others. 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 299 304 257 577 552 607 485 395 357 261 673 676 647 882 774 772 873 802 895 859 (227) (225) (203) (291) (177) (145) (211) (158) (188) (173) 93 112 171 221 247 275 538 358 155 464 17 12 25 5 7 12 9 12 12 16 1,082 1,104 1,127 1,685 1,580 1.666 1.905 1,567 1,719 1,600 1,658 1,797 1,561 1,734 1,417 1,331 1,296 1,223 1,070 887 2,740 2,901 2,688 3,419 2,997 2,997 3.201 2,790 2,789 2,487 44,769.3 46,509.0 45,287.0 51,262.7 58,929.2 60,569.8 59,940.5 58,925.6 58,925.1 27,171.9 32,249.3 24,309.4 27,165.5 35,294.0 33,679.6 43,146.4 42,108.8 37,734.3 610,976.5 593,923.0 649,749.4 632,707.1 634,765.3 631,149.2' 532,290.2 540,373.2 343,536.8 48,183.9 49,784.4 43,088.1 35,623.3 62,148.4 61,749.1 77,971.9 76,284.0 52,416.9 232,707.5 242,855.4 225,628.2 217,026.7 231,184.1 227,343.0 217,090.2 209,266.2 201,784.2 1,102.0 1,157.1 1,099.6 1,111.7 1,315.6 1,596.4 1,710.2 1,339.8 1, d62.3 964,911.1 966,478.2 989,161.7 964,897.0 1,023,636.5 1,016,085.1 931,846.4 928,297.6 692,527.4 723.0 744.5 702.7 769.2 823.9 860.8 919.7 875.5 866.1 51.3 58.7 48.4 50.4 62.3 60.6 73.8 70.6 69.2 313.2 311.1 312.8 313.9 322.0 333.2 308.7 308.6 251.7 92.0 98.0 83.5 72.1 115.4 115.2 143.6 142.7 109.1 534.7 542,5 487.1 495.5 520.7 535.0 535.0 534.5 528.7 74.2 81.1 73.1 75.6 93.2 94.2 93.1 89.5 83.4 1,788.4 1,835.9 1,707.6 1,776.7 1,938.4 1,999.0 2,073.9 2,021.4' 1,908.2 27.3 10.8 16.8 23.2 4.3 1.2 7.3 19.4 6.3 2.6 6.0 .5 4.0 2.1 1.0 1.8 3.6 1.1 1.5 1.8 20.0 20.1" 20.1' 19.7' 19.7' 19.2' 19.0' 19.0' 17.9 16.4 80.7 88.3 91.2 88.2 75.8 77.3 77.8 81.2 83.6 64.0 273.6 273.6 272.1 270.6 269.0 268.5 263.3 263.3 262.9 252.0 123.3 123.3 123.0 123.0 123.0 122.7 120.4 120.4 120.1 104.0 9.5 9.5 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.1 8.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 506 502 482 480 480 469 457 449 439 424 *For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160. (Note 1986 navigation figures were not available as of press time, and will be included in the FY 1987 Annual Report on Civil Works Activities.) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY I WASHINGTON, DC 20310 7 DEC 1987 TO: THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: Annual Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1986 I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1986 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1985 and September 1986. John S. Doyle, Jr. Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) CONTENTS NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ............................................................. NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: N ew York, NY, D istrict...................................................................... Philadelphia, PA, District ................................................................... Baltimore, MD, District N orfolk, VA , D istrict ............... .... .................................................... SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: W ilm ington, NC, D istrict .................................................................... Charleston, SC, D istrict ..................................... ................................ Savannah, GA, District ..................................................................... Jacksonville, FL, District .................................................................... M obile, A L, D istrict ......................................................................... LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION: New Orleans, LA, District ................................................................... Vicksburg, MS, District ..................................................................... M em phis, TN , D istrict ...................................................................... St. Louis, MO, District ...................................................................... SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION: G alveston, TX, D istrict ...................................................................... Forth W orth, TX, District ................................................................... Albuquerque, NM , District..................... ............................................. Little Rock, AR, D istrict .................................................................... Tulsa, O K , D istrict.......................................................................... MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION: Kansas City, MO, District ................................................................... Omaha, NE, District ........................................................................ OHIO RIVER DIVISION: O hio R iver ................................................................................. Nashville, TN, District ....................................................................... Louisville, KY, District ...................................................................... Huntington, WV, District .................................................................... Pittsburgh, PA, District ..................................................................... NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION: St. Paul, MN, District ....................................................................... Rock Island, IL, D istrict ............................................ ....................... Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ............................... Chicago, IL, District ........................................................................ Detroit, MI, District ........................................................................ Buffalo, NY, District ........................................................................ Page 1-1 2-1 3-1 ................ ........... ............. ........ .............. 4 -1 5-1 6-1 7-1 8-1 9-1 10-1 11-1 12-1 13-1 14-1 15-1 16-1 17-1 18-1 19-1 20-1 21-1 22-1 23-1 24-1 25-1 26-1 27-1 28-1 29-1 30-1 31-1 32-1 SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Los Angeles, CA, District .................................................................. 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District ................................................................ 34-1 Sacram ento, CA, District ................................................................... 35-1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION ........................................................... 36-1 NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Portland, OR, District...................................................................... 37-1 Seattle, W A, District ....................................................................... 38-1 Walla Walla WA, District................................................................... 39-1 Alaska District ............................................................................ 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors.................................................... 41-1 Mississippi River Commission ................................................................ 42-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities ................................. 43-1 California Debris Commission ................................................................ 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ............................................................... 45-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ................................... 46-1 Investigations of Projects Under Federal Power Act............................................ 47-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness ...................... 48-1 International Boundary Waters Boards ........................................................ 49-1 Construction Enginering Research Laboratory .................................................. 50-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ........................................................... 51-1 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory ................................................. 52-1 Water Resources Support Center ............................................................. 53-1 APPENDICES: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1986 ...................................... A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1986 .......................... B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1986 .................................. C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction September 30, 1986 ............................... D-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power In Operation September 30, 1986 ................ ...... E-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1986 ................ F-1 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented During Fiscal Year 1986 ............................ G-1 INDEX ........................................................................ I-1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION * The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control .................... 1-3 2. Black Rock Harbor, CT .................... 1-3 3. Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI ................. 1-3 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA ....................... 1-3 5. Connecticut River Below Hartford, CT ........................... 1-4 6. Green Harbor, MA .......................... 1-4 7. Hampton Harbor, NH ...................... 1-5 8. Hyannis Harbor, MA ........................ 1-5 9. Jonesport Harbor, ME ..................... 1-5 10. Kennebec River, ME ....................... 1-6 11. Mystic River, MA .......................... 1-6 12. New Haven Harbor, CT .................... 1-6 13. New London Harbor, CT ................... 1-7 14. Newburyport Harbor, MA ................. 1-7 15. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, Point Judith, RI ................. 1-7 16. Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, M A ................ .............. 1-8 17. Royal River, ME .......................... 1-8 18. Saco River, M E ............... ............. 1-9 19. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ..................................... 1-9 20. Other authorized navigation projects .................................... 1-9 21. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) .......................... 1-9 22. Authorized bridge alteration ............... 1-9 Beach Erosion Control 23. Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA ................. 1-9 24. Revere Beach, MA ................. .... 1-10 25. Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects .................. 1-10 26. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ..... ................... 1-10 27. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) .............. 1-10 Flood Control 28. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .. Page . 1-10 28A. Blackstone River, Millbury, MA ............ 1-10 28B. Clear River, Burrillville, RI ............... 1-10 28C. Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI ............. 1-11 28D. West Hill Dam, MA ....................... 1-11 28E. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ....................... 1-11 29. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT .......................... 1-11 29A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ................... 1-12 29B. Barre Falls Dam, MA ..................... 1-12 29C. Beaver Brook, Keene, NH ................. 1-13 29D. Birch Hill Dam, MA ...................... 1-13 29E. Colebrook River Lake, CT .................. 1-13 29F. Conant Brook Dam, MA .................... 1-13 29G. Knightville Dam, MA ..................... 1-13 29H. Littleville Lake, MA ....................... 1-13 291. Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT ............... 1-14 29J. North Hartland Lake, VT ................. 1-14 29K. North Springfield Lake, VT ............... 1-14 29L. Otter Brook Lake, NH ..................... 1-14 29M. Park River, Hartford, CT ................. 1-14 29N. South River, Conway, MA ................. 1-15 290. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ................ 1-15 29P. Townshend Lake, VT...................... 1-15 29Q. Tully Lake, MA ........................... 1-16 29R. Union Village Dam, VT ................... 1-16 29S. West Springfield, MA ..................... 1-16 30. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ....... 1-16 30A. Black Rock Lake, CT ...................... 1-16 30B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT .................. 1-17 30C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ....................... 1-17 30D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ................ 1-17 30E. Thomaston Dam, CT ...................... 1-17 31 Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA ...................... 1-17 32. Gulf Street and Trumbull Avenue, M ilford, CT ............................... 1-18 33. Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT ............ 1-18 1-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Page 34. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ...... 1-18 34A. Blackwater Dam, NH ..................... 1-18 34B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ............. 1-18 34C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH .................. 1-19 34D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............. 1-19 35. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ............................. 1-19 36. New London, CT .......................... 1-19 37. Saint John River Basin, ME ............... 1-20 38. Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME ............. 1-20 39. Penobscot River, Old Town, ME ............ 1-20 40. Pleasant Point, Perry, ME ................. 1-20 41. Stamford, CT ............................. 1-20 42. Thames River Basin, CT, RI and M A ................................... 1-21 42A. Buffumville Lake, MA .................... 1-21 42B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ................. 1-21 42C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ................. 1-21 42D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ................ 1-21 42E. West Thompson Lake, CT ................. 1-22 42F. Westville Lake, MA ...................... 1-22 43. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................ 1-22 44. Flood control reservoir operations .................................. 1-22 45. Hurricane barrier operations .............. 1-23 46. Other authorized flood control projects ............................ 1-23 47. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 1-23 48. Deauthorized projects ...................... 1-24 General Investigations 49. Surveys ................................... 1-24 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 1-24 Page 51. 52. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ........ .................. 1-24 Advance Engineering and Design .......... 1-24 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ............................ 1-25 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 1-33 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... 1-38 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............... 1-42 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 1-43 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ..... 1-44 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ................ 1-45 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 .................. 1-46 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 .................. 1-46 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 .................. 1-47 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin ................ 1-47 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin .............. 1-48 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin ................ 1-49 Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin ............... 1-51 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin .................. 1-52 Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA ................... 1-52 Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................... 1-53 1-2 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 30 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. Surveys were made in each of the six New England States to determine: State level programs; the relationships of the Aquatic Plant Control Program and extent of specific needs. As a result of these surveys the program has been directed toward technical assistance activities upon request. We continue to work closely with the States. 2. BLACK ROCK HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island, about 51 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12369). Existing project. Black Rock Harbor and Cedar Creek Channel, 18 feet deep and 100 to 200 feet wide from the 18 foot contour in Black Rock Harbor to the heads of both branches of Cedar Creek, about 2.4 miles. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for Black Rock Harbor breakwaters and Burr and Cedar Creek anchorage there is no reasonable prospect that required cooperation will be forthcoming from local interests. For further details see Annual Report for 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 6 waterfront facilities serving Black Rock Harbor. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: In conjunction with Field Verification Program, $23,000 was expended to extend existing lease of land. 3. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, RI Location. Bristol Harbor is on the east side of upper Narragansett Bay, in Bristol County, about 13 miles southeast of Providence, Rhode Island. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13224, 13221 and 13218). Existing project. The project provides for an offshore breakwater 1,600 feet long located about 400 feet west of the Coast Guard pier and extending generally in a northwesterly direction. Construction has not begun. Revised plan developed during advance engineering and design recommends an A-frame type breakwater 1,250 feet long. Total estimated cost (June 1986) of the modified plan is $4,600,000 of which $1,996,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and provide a cash contribution currently estimated at 50 percent of project cost based on project benefits. Terminal facilities. The developed waterfront of Bristol Harbor is concentrated along a half-mile stretch of east shore of harbor. In this section, there are six privately owned landings, two owned by the town, one by the State, and one by the Federal government. All private landings are of granite construction and have truck access. Two have gasoline and one has diesel oil service; and are used primarily for landing shellfish. Town and State piers are open to public, and include facilities for about 50 small boats and finger piers for larger craft. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continuing General Design activity focused mainly on the project's economic analysis and in particular a detailed review of project benefits. This review determined that earlier projected commercial benefits are no longer applicable and that benefits expected to be realized from the project are almost entirely recreational in nature. Further, the estimated annual benefits are now less than the estimated annual costs, resulting in a benefit-to-cost ratio of less than one. The town of Bristol was informed of this development and of our intention to cease further activity and to recommend that the project be placed in an inactive status. 4. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, MA, to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246). Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. 1-3 - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract, awarded last fiscal year, for rehabilitation of the Sandwich Bulkhead was completed in September 1986 with $1,521,000 expended this fiscal year. A contract for installation of suspension cables and other repair work on the Bourne and Sagamore Bridges was awarded in January 1986 and was 65 percent complete ending the fiscal year. Contract payments of $1,111,000 were made in fiscal year 1986. Contracts awarded and completed in fiscal year 1986 were: purchase of suspension cables for Bourne Bridge $197,000; purchase of riprap stone for canal banks $50,000; architectural engineering contract to prepare plans and specifications for rehabilitation of railroad bridge $218,000. Other fiscal year 1986 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: resource management facilities, including operating equipment $35,000; replacement parts for the computerized electronic traffic control system $27,000; repairs to project vessels $36,000; replacement of project maintenance equipment $31,000; engineering and design 90,000; supervision and administration of contracts $150,000; operation and maintenance of railroad bridge, tower and signal system $102,000; vessel traffic control activities $745,000; operation of recreation areas $315,000; supervision and administration by Division office $223,000; condition surveys $35,000; real estate activities $67,000 and operational costs for roads, bridges and project facilities $1,043,000. 5. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 and 12377). Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Along both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each river town, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Scheduled maintenance dredging was deferred due to insignificant shoaling. A contract for maintenance dredging of the entrance to Wethersfield Cove was awarded in June 1986. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $44,881 were incurred for check surveys, sampling and testing, preparation of plans and specifications and an environmental assessment. 6. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253). Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5-acre anchorage near Town Pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200 feet extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Construction was completed in October, 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work under a maintenance contract in progress in October continued through the month. A total of 30,000 cubic yards of material was removed from the entrance channel at a cost of $114,600. The contract was terminated in fiscal year 1986 for default when the contractor failed to return in the spring to complete the work. Advertisement for bids to remove two limited shoal areas produced no 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION qualified bidders. Hired labor costs of $44,034 were incurred for preparation of an environmental assessment, plans and specifications, surveys and supervision and inspection associated with the dredging. Additional hired labor costs of $13,871 were incurred for analysis of alternatives and preparation of a report on entrance area modifications by the Waterways Experiment Station. 7. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor, 5 miles north of mouth of Merrimack River at Newburyport, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278). Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet of south jetty and constructing a 180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance bar. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in November 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains three pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet north of entrance and one in Seabrook one-half mile south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One landing is open to public. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging planned for this fiscal year was deferred due to funding limitations. Hired labor costs of $3,587 were incurred for a utilization survey and preparation of an environmental assessment. 8. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. On south shore of Cape Cod about 16 miles west of Chatham, Massachusetts and 20 miles northeast of Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237). Existing project. A stone breakwater 1,170 feet long, lying about 0.7 mile off shore, dredging to 15.5 feet deep in protected area behind breakwater; a channel 12 feet deep with widths of 150 and 100 feet in outer and inner harbors respectively, an anchorage area 12 feet deep and and about 5 acres in area adjacent to inner harbor channel north of Harbor Bluff; and a riprap jetty 1,000 feet long extending south from Dunbar Point. Mean spring tidal ranges in outer harbor 3.1 and 3.7 feet, respectively. Breakwater was completed in 1882 and dredging behind breakwater in 1906. Rehabilitation was necessary to restore breakwater to its designed purpose of providing a harbor of refuge. Restoration was completed in November 1961. Construction of 12-foot channel and anchorage was initiated in May and completed in November 1959. Commonwealth of Massachusetts constructed the jetty extending south from Dunbar Point in 1962. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Payment of an additional $6,282 was made on the maintenance dredging contract awarded last fiscal year. The contract was not closed out at the end of the fiscal year pending resolution of claims. Hired labor costs of $10,008 were incurred for supervision and inspection associated with the contract claim and for work on an environmental assessment. 9. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, Maine about 190 miles northeast of Portland, Maine, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, Maine. Existing project. Provides for a combined rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed of 9 acres, 6 feet deep, and 6 acres, 8 feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Latest approved cost estimate (October 1985) is $9,520,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the Administration and the Senate majority leadership, local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide, maintain, and operate necessary mooring facilities and utilities including a public landing in Sawyer Cove with berthing depths alongside the landing commensurate with the depth provided in the entrance channel and including an adequate access road, parking area, and suitable related facilities open to all on equal terms, including transients; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; reserve spaces within the harbor adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms, including transients; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of Jonesport Harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and 1-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 control; pay 10 percent of project cost during construction; and pay an additional 10 percent of project costs within a period of 30 years following completion. Terminal facilities. There are thirteen privately owned wharves in the harbor, twelve of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: All preconstruction planning and design activity was completed, including the preparation of contract plans and specifications. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by both the local sponsors and the department of the Army. At year end local interests were pursuing means of financing their share of project construction. 10. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. Drains a large number of lakes and minor streams, and flows from Moosehead Lake about 150 miles southerly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 25 miles east of Portland. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13298). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A channel 27 feet deep and not less than 500 feet wide, extending from mouth to bridge at Bath; thence to Gardiner a channel not less than 150 feet wide, 17 feet deep at Beef Rock Shoal, at foot of Swan Island, 18 feet deep through rock at Lovejoy Narrows, near head of Swan Island, decreasing to 16 feet deep at Gardiner; channel west of Swan Island, 100 feet wide, 12 feet deep, except at upper shoal, where depth was to be 15 feet; and channel 125 feet wide and 11 feet deep from Gardiner upstream to Augusta at head of navigation. Section of river included in project is about 44 miles long. Work includes dredging, rock excavation, and two riprap training walls. Portion of project for dredging 27-foot channel from Bath Iron Works Corp. to 0.6 of a mile above bridge at Bath is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $129,500. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Of the 24 wharves at Bath, 5 are publicly owned and 19 privately owned; about one-third are in poor repair and little used. Rail connections are available at 19 wharves at Bath. Depths alongside range from 12 to 25 feet. At other points named above there are 16 wharves in usable condition. All but one are equipped with mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Those open to the public on equal terms are two at Hallowell and one each at Randolph and Augusta. None are publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the Doubling Point Reach was accomplished in late September 1986 by the Government hopper dredge MCFARLAND at a rental cost of $349,999. Approximately 57,902 cubic yards of material was removed, restoring the Reach to 27.0 feet below mean low water. Hired labor costs of $15,092 were incurred for progress surveys and supervision and inspection. 11. MYSTIC RIVER, MA Location. Rises in Mystic Lake, MA, flows southeasterly 7 miles and empties into Boston Harbor near Boston Naval Shipyard. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13272). Previous projects. For details see page 1743 of Annual Report 1915, and page 59 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channel 35 feet deep, extending from limit of 35-foot channel of Boston Harbor at Mystic River Bridge to approximately 300 feet downstream of Malden Bridge, having width varying from about 940 feet at its lower end, to about 1,060 feet at a point about 1,200 feet below the Malden Bridge, thence decreasing to 150 feet at its upper limit; channel 20 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot channel to a point 800 feet above Malden Bridge, with widths decreasing from 150 feet at lower end to 75 feet through drawspan, thence increasing to about 340 feet to form turning basin above bridge; channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Boston & Maine Railroad (western division) Bridge to about 2,500 feet above Wellington Bridge, about 1 mile, and thence 4 feet deep, gradually narrowing from 100 to 50 feet at upper end for about 2 miles to head of commercial navigation at Craddock Bridge in Medford. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean range of tide is 9.6 feet at Mystic River Bridge, 9.6 feet at Wellington Bridge, and 9.3 feet at Craddock Bridge. Extreme range is 13.7 feet. Project was completed in June 1958. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In section of river benefited by 35- foot channel project there are on the south bank four wharves consisting of substantial stone or wooden bulkheads filled solid, aggregating over 4,000 feet of berthing space; also a lumber terminal, the largest of its kind on the Atlantic Coast, equipped with most modern mechanical appliances, has railroad connections and occupies 4,400 feet of waterfront. On north bank of river there is a large wharf used for receipt and shipment of oil on extensive scale; and adjacent thereto an extensive terminal used in connection with an iron works. There are several other wharves downstream of Malden Bridge and on west bank of Island End River used for receipt and shipment of coal, coke, tar, oil and in connection with a generating plant. None of the above is publicly owned or opened to general public use. In 20-foot channel section on south bank there are 1,850 feet and on north bank 1,235 feet of available dockage; none of which is publicly owned, two are open to public on payment of charges. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Incidental hired labor costs of $792 were incurred for finalizing and administrating the deobligation of funds from a prior fiscal year contract for sediment testing. 12. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12371). Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1978. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 53 waterfront facilities; 40 are within city limits of New Haven, and 5 in West Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Nearly half of the facilities have rail connections and most are accessible by paved streets. Nineteen wharves have mechanical handling facilities, six wharves are open to public use upon agreement with the owners. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Funds from a prior fiscal year contract for sediment testing were deobligated. 13. NEW LONDON HARBOR, CT Location. On the north shore of Long Island, at its eastern end and about 14 miles east of the mouth of the Connecticut River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13213). Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880, March 3, 1881, and July 13, 1892. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1753 and 116, respectively. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1938. The Department of the Navy has twice deepened extensive lengths of the harbor in the interest of the National Defense. In May 1980 they completed their second effort. The Corps, at request of the Department of the Navy is currently maintaining these deeper depths within width limits of the authorized Corps' project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work; for new work, local interests are required to provide easements and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; make such alterations to underwater utilities as necessary to enable full realization of the project benefits; and improve berth and access channels commensurate with the project depth. Terminal facilities. There are 36 wharves and piers in a developed frontage of about 3 miles. Seven piers are owned by the Federal Government of which five are being used. One pier is owned by the State and one by the city. Eight waterfront facilities are equipped to receive petroleum products. Seven of the wharves have direct rail connections. The total available berthage space is about 27,000 feet. (For further details, see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Southern New England, 1983). 1-7 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract of the 36-foot channel was awarded in December 1985 and work was completed in February 1986. A total of 331,400 cubic yards of material was removed. Contract costs of $443,503 were paid by the Corps of Engineers and Contributed Funds of $517,557 were provided by the Navy for a total contract of $961,060. Hired labor costs of $111,562 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 14. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13282). Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. Portion of project for continuous channel from sea to wharves at Newburyport, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (June 1955) is $106,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project except for inactive portion was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in these jetties completed in September 1970. Plum Island Basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed in 1901. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty wharves extending along a frontage of about 3,500 feet of south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one small pier on north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $6,850 were incurred for work on an environmental assessment. 15. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI Location. Point Judith marks southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, with a length north and south of about 4 miles, lying in rear of sandy beach of Rhode Island shore, just west of Point Judith Harbor by a narrow opening through sand dunes. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of steel sheetpile bulkhead construction which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two State piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a bulkhead with 15 finger piers projecting channelward there from provides berthing space of about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of fish and fish products for dehydrating purposes. Mechanical handling facilities including fish pumps, are available for discharge of cargo. In addition, there are approximately 10 small privately owned wharves used in the fishing business and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A payment of $393,999 was made to the contractor relative to contract for breakwater repairs which was terminated last fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $3,540 were incurred for testing and $27,725 for supervision and inspection relating to contract claims. Further payments, if any, are pending results of audit. 16. ROCKPORT AND OLD HARBORS, ROCKPORT, MA Location. The town of Rockport is located on the seaward end of Cape Ann on the northeast Massachusetts coast about 35 miles north of Boston. The town is bordered by the city of Gloucester to the west, Essex Bay to the north, Massachusetts Bay to the south, and Sandy Bay to the east. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13278 and 13279). Existing project. Rebuilding the two breakwaters at entrance of harbor with rubblestone to a height of 18.5 feet and removing the principal rocks in the harbor. This work was completed in 1905. Current modification: An access channel -10 feet deep at mean low water (MLW) by 80 feet wide, leading from deep water outside the existing Federal breakwaters 1,100 feet to the town wharf at the center of the harbor. At the wharf the 10-foot channel branches to form two 40-foot-wide channels leading to the north and south iner anchorage basins which are separated by the wharf. The North Basin would have an area of 1.7 acres and a depth of -8 feet MLW. The South Basin would have an area of 1.3 acres and a depth of -8 feet MLW. Two additional outer harbor anchorages, both 8 feet deep at MLW would be located along the 80-foot-wide access channel between the breakwaters and the town wharf. The plan of improvement developed for Pigeon Cove consists of a 75-foot-wide channel -10 feet deep MLW extending from deep water outside the breakwater 550 feet across the southeast end of the cove to the public pier and offloading facilities. An anchorage area north of the channel would be dredged to -8 feet deep MLW. (See Table 1-B at the end of chapter for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. For the current modification: contribute in cash, prior to construction, 3.3 percent of the first cost of construction; provide, maintain and operate without cost to the United States, an adequate public landing with provisions for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water open and available to the use of all on equal terms; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States alterations and relocations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; provide and maintain mooring facilities as needed for transient and local vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas and other needed public-use shore facilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitations; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor. Terminal facilities. There are four commercial wharves, one of granite, the others of timber construction. There is one yacht club with a public landing. Facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The project was authorized for construction and contract plans and specifications were completed. Local assurances and contributed funds were received. A $811,111 contract was awarded on May 6, 1986 but actual work will not begin until October 1986 due to environmental constraints. Contract expenditures for the fiscal year were $16,272. 17. ROYAL RIVER, ME Location. Situated 11 miles north of Portland, Maine in Yarmouth Village. Royal is a small coastal stream which empties into Casco Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13290). Existing project. Provides for enlargement of channel through bar at Gravel Point, 100 feet wide, 4.5 feet deep up to head of commercial navigation at Yarmouth, and removal of several ledges near village of Yarmouth; construction of 195-foot rubblestone jetty opposite Wolfe's Point, and dredging channel 4.5 feet deep through obstructed channels; as modified under Section 107 authority, the project provides for a channel 8 feet deep, 80 feet wide from State channel in Casco Bay to commercial wharf at Yarmouth and anchorage of 8 acres, 6 feet deep down- 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION stream of Interstate 95 Highway Bridge. Project was completed in June 1969. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Town has constructed public landing and launching ramp immediately below Interstate 95 Highway Bridge on north bank. There are two boatyards equipped with floats, marine railways and launching ramps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work under a maintenance dredging contract awarded last fiscal year was completed. Payments under the contract this fiscal year were $114,221 for a total contract cost of $252,121. A total of 42,626 cubic yards of material was removed. Hired labor costs of $17,865 were incurred for supervision and inspection and completion of after dredge surveys. 18. SACO RIVER, ME Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13287). Existing project. For description of completed existing portion of project see Annual Report for 1978. For a description of completed improvement of project see Annual Report for 1983. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river used for summer passenger business. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Payment of $9,504 was processed for a contract awarded last fiscal year for installation of spindles and day beacons on the jetty and breakwater. All work is complete. Navigation aids are to be maintained by the Coast Guard. 19. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter). 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter). 21. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter). Alterations of Bridges 22. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. 23. LYNN-NAHANT BEACH, MA Location. The beach is one continuous beach comprised of King's Beach Reservation in the town of Swampscott, Lynn Short Reservation in the city of Lynn, and Nahant Beach Parkway in the town of Nahant, all of which are in Essex County, Massachusetts. Lynn Beach is located between the towns of Swampscott to the north and Nahant to the south. A small section of the southern end of the proposed project is located in the town of Nahant. The beach is 7%2 miles northeast of the city of Boston. Existing project. The authorized plan consists of the direct placement of approximately 172,000 cubic yards of suitable sandfill for a distance of 2,600 feet between Woodbury's Point and the dune on the Nahant tombolo. The plan will provide a protective, recreational dry beach berm along the backshore to an elevation of 18.0 feet above mean low water (MLW). Local cooperation. Local interests are rquired to construct the project presently estimated at $1,510,000. The Federal share of the cost of construction is 57.7 percent or $871,270 and will be reimbursed to non-Federal interests upon the completion of construction. Provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for project construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. Maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the Federal participation is based and its administration for public use during the 50-year economic life of the project. Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damages that may arise before, during, or after prosecution of the work and subsequent maintenance of the project other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Maintain the protective measures during the 50-year economic life of the project as may be required to serve their intended purpose by contributing 42.3 percent of the cost of periodic annual sand nourishment for the economic life of the project. The current estimated cost of periodic sand nourishment is $56,000 annually. The Federal share is 57.7 percent or $32,000 and will be reimbursed to non-Federal interests upon the completion of each nourishment operation. Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of the bathers. Operations during fiscal year. New work: (Note: the following is provided for record purposes for work accomplished in fiscal year 1983 but inadvertantly omitted from the fiscal year 1983 Annual Report). The sponsoring Metropolitan District Commission was prepared to construct the project in fiscal year 1983. Federal funding of $875,000 was received in anticipation of reimbursing the MDC for the Federal share. In-house costs of $50,000 were incurred for project formulation reviews and environmental report efforts undertaken in conjunction with the MDC. At the last moment, however, the MDC encountered unexpected strong local opposition to the project 1-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 and, as a result, terminated its plans to construct the project. The project was subsequently placed in the inactive category. 24. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, approximately 7 miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor and 6 miles northeast of the city of Boston. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle). Existing project. Placement of sandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50 foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach will extend approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high water line. The estimated total first cost (October 1985) of the project is $7,850,000 of which 36 percent is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the Administration and the Senate majority leadership, local interests are required to: contribute in cash 36 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $2,585,000; contribute in cash 36 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 15 years, now estimated at $22,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 15 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design continued, primarily in area of coordination with local sponsors on availability of sandfill source and satisfying environmental and permit requirements in anticipation of project construction. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1986. 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter). 27. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See table 1-I at end of chapter). Flood Control 28. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester,Ma, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan). 28A. BLACKSTONE RIVER, MILLBURY, MA Location. The town of Millbury is located in the southcentral part of Worcester County in central Massachusetts, and lies about 3 miles south of Worcester. Existing project. Remove the existing shoal and construct a stone slope protection along both banks of the Blackstone River to prevent further erosion and possible loss of McCracken Road Bridge. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract awarded last fiscal year was completed in November 1985. Contract payment this fiscal year was $123,243 for a total contract amount of $188,243. 28B. CLEAR RIVER, BURRILLVILLE, RI Location. The town of Burrillville is located in the northwest corner of Rhode Island. The main stem of the Clear River originates in the northwest corner of Rhode 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Island and flows easterly for 8 miles to its confluence with the Branch River. Existing project. Remove approximately 60 linear feet of granite retaining wall, which has been damaged from erosion, and construct a new mortared stone wall. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; and prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction project in the amount of $110,774 was awarded in June 1986 and was 5 percent complete at fiscal year end. 28C. PAWTUXET RIVER, WARWICK RI Location. The Pawtuxet River flows in a northeasterly direction through West Warwick, Warwick and Cranston before it discharges into Narragansett Bay at Pawtuxet Cove. The watershed has a maximum length of 18 miles running west to east and 23 miles width from north to south. The drainage area at its mouth in Pawtuxet Cove is 230 square miles. The project is located in the Norwood section of Warwick, locally referred to as Belmont Park. Existing project. Consists of acquisition, demolition and removal from the flood plain a total of 61 homes; acquisition of 19 privately owned vacant lots; construction of 12 above ground utility room additions to residences which experience basement flooding; and the installation of an automated flood forecasting and warning system. The current estimated project cost is $4,000,000 with the Federal government paying 80 percent of the project cost up to a Federal limit of $4 million. After implementation, the city of Warwick would be responsible for the cost of operating and maintaining the flood forecasting/warning system. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for authorizing legislation). Project implementation was begun in September 1982 with property acquisition. Acquisition is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests were required to implement acqusition and removal of properties and pay 20 percent of project costs unless total project costs exceeded $5,000,000 in which case local interests would incur all costs above that figure. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Acquisition was completed. A total of 8 properties were acquired during the year, bringing the total to 82. The utility room additions were completed under two contracts for a total cost of $360,000. 28D. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps - Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 28E. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts- Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest cost estimate for new work is $9,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,121,283 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $584,693. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plan lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Resolution of remaining condemnation cases continued. Of 27 tracts remaining to be settled at the beginning of the fiscal year, 5 were resolved. Fiscal year costs totalled $96,871 including $48,750 for fee/easement acquisition, $9,200 for appraisal contracts, $4,021 in hired labor costs for miscellaneous project administration activities, and $34,900 for condemnation trial activity. Maintenance: Contract costs of $59,542 for boundary marking were incurred. Hired labor costs for project surveillance and inspection as well as land use administration were $96,697. 29. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN VT, NH, MA and CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. 1-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects ih the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, Hartford, VT and Wethersfield, CT authorized and constructed in accordance with section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Local protection project at Keene, NH authorized in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act, is under construction. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville,VT and Conway,MA authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act are under construction. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works included in comprehensive plan). 29A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in May 1985 to update the control panels at two projects was completed in October 1985. Final contract amount was $15,595 of which $5,073 was the Ball Mountain portion. 29B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre,MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA.(See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA, and Wachusett Mountain, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year, to replace the gatehouse furnace and utility building boiler was completed. Final contract amount was $14,700. A contract to replace the sewage disposal system was awarded in August 1985 and completed in November 1985. Final contract amount was $23,587. A contract for repairing the gatehouse masonry was awarded in May 1986 and is scheduled for completion next fiscal year. Contract amount is $36,453. 29C. BEAVER BROOK, KEENE, NH Location. Keene is located in southwestern New Hampshire approximately 15 miles north of the Massachusetts border and 12 miles east of the Vermont border. Existing project. Consists of structural modifications to the outlet of the Three Mile Swamp and widening the Beaver Brook channel in the reach between Water Street and Marlboro Street. Estimated project first costs amount to $2,100,000 of which the Federal first cost totals $1,925,000. Non-Federal first costs are estimated to total $175,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction was essentially complete as of the end of the fiscal year. Contract earnings to date are $1,717,592. 29D. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 29E. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the Control House roof at six damsites was awarded in April 1985 and completed in November 1985. Total contract amount was $23,985 of which $3,895 was for the Colebrook River Lake replacement. 29F. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southeast of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 29G. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 29H. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, 1 mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. 1-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the Control House roof at six damsites was awarded in April 1985 and completed in November 1985. Total contract amount was $23,985 of which $4,865 was for the Littleville Lake replacement. 29I. MILL BROOK, BROWNSVILLE, VT Location. The project is located along Mill Brook behind the Gleanor Grange Hall in the village of Brownsville, Vermont. The village is located in the town of West Windsor, Vermont in Windsor County, about 12 miles north of Springfield, Vermont and 9.5 miles northwest of Claremont, New Hampshire. Existing project. The streambank stabilization project consists of concrete grid block protection placed along 120 feet of eroded streambank. The grid block is 6 inches thick, placed on a 1-foot gravel layer on a slope 1 vertical to 1-5 horizontal. The grid block is to be anchored 5 feet below the streambed and will extend approximately 8 feet above the channel bed. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract in the amount of $48,735 was awarded in September 1986. Construction is expected to begin in June 1987 following spring runoff. 29J. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in June 1984, to replace the emergency generator and feeder circuit was completed in October 1985. Final contract amount was $48,893. 29K. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT and Claremont, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract for remedial measures for seepage control that was awarded in July 1985 was completed in June 1986. Final contract amount was $810,000. A contract for pavement repairs of the recreation area road and parking area was awarded in April 1986 and completed in July 1986. Contract amount was $18,835. 29L. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH). Existing project.For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in June 1984 to replace the emergency generator was completed in November 1985. Contract amount was $23,229. A contract awarded in June 1985 to replace the two bridges in the recreation area was completed in May 1986. Final contract amount was $112,866. A contract in the amount of $31,180 for surface treatment of the Access Road was awarded in July 1986 and was 43 percent complete at fiscal year end. 29M. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT Location. On the Park River in the city of Hartford, Hartford County, CT. (See Geological Survey map of Hartford North, CT). Existing project. Authorized as a modification to completed Hartford, CT local protection project. (For details on completed project see Annual Report for 1960). Two sections of reinforced concrete conduit totalling 2,569 feet with width of 34 feet and height of 26.5 feet on the Park River; one section of reinforced concrete conduit 103 feet long, 36 feet wide and 27.5 feet high on the South Branch; two sections of reinforced concrete conduit 1,364 feet long, 22 feet wide and 25 feet high on the North Branch; a reinforced concrete junction structure to combine the flows from the North and South Branches and distribute them to the Park River and auxiliary conduits and thence to the Connecticut River, circular auxiliary conduit approximately 9,200 feet long to be constructed as a deep tunnel in rock with an inside diameter of 22 feet and lined with 9-inch thick precast concrete walls, an inlet structure and an outlet structure; a concrete headwall at 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION the entrance to the North Branch conduit extension; and two pumping stations on the banks of the Park River. The latest approved cost estimate (September 1984) for new work is $1,300,000 for lands including relocations and $60,177,000 for construction, a total of $61,477,000. Total includes local costs of $1,200,000 for lands and $100,000 for relocations. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and operation of project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion; upon completion of conduit construction replace pavements, sidewalks, drainage and other appurtenances, including those at Broad Street, Flower Street and Laurel Street and bear cost of removal, replacement and modification to sewers, drains, utilities or highways beyond the area required for excavation and construction of the project; prevent changes in headpool ponding areas which would decrease the effectiveness of the improvements and if ponding areas and capacities are impaired, promptly substitute equivalent storage capacity; and undertake all practical measures to prevent pollution from entering the Park River conduit system. Operations during fiscal year. New work: As a result of recent remedial work the O&M manual was revised. Preparation of as-built drawings is underway. 29N. SOUTH RIVER, CONWAY, MA Location. The South River originates below the Lower Reservoir in Ashfield, Massachusetts and joins the Deerfield River in Conway. The river is approximately 15 miles long and flows in a southeasterly direction through Conway. The town of Conway is located in Franklin County in western Massachusetts within the 655 square mile Deerfield River drainage basin. It is situated approximately five miles west of Interstate 91 between the communities of Greenfield and Shelburne Falls to its north, and Northampton to its south. Existing project. The plan at Site 2 calls for clearing and grubbing of the existing slope and refilling the eroded areas with compacted random fill. Slope protection consisting of a 3-foot thick uniform stone layer underlain by filter layers of 1-foot thick stone bedding and 1-foot thick gravel bedding would be placed on the random fill. The plan at Site 3 calls for clearing and grubbing the existing terraced slope and refilling the eroded areas with compacted random fill. Slope protection would be provided for the lower bank consisting of a 2-foot thick uniform stone layer underlain by a 1-foot thick gravel bedding layer and continuing to the top of the bank with loam and seed. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract in the amount of $75,443 was awarded in August 1986. Work is scheduled for completion next fiscal year. 290. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year, to repair the roads and parking area of the recreation area was completed in October 1985. Final contract amount was $81,770. 29P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about 2 miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in May 1985 to update the control panels at two projects was completed in October 1985. Final contract amount was $15,595 of which $10,522 was the Townshend Lake portion. A contract awarded in July 1985 for remedial measures for seepage control of relief wells was completed in February 1986. Final contract amount was $273,955. A contract to replace the emergency generator was awarded in May 1986 and is scheduled for completion next fiscal year. Contract amount is $38,474. A contract for pavement repairs in the recreation area was awarded in June 1986 and is scheduled for completion next fiscal year. Contract amount of $49,290 was approximately 28 percent complete at fiscal year end. 1-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 29Q. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is 1 mile north of Fryville, MA and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 29R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, VT and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 29S. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The West Springfield local protection works are located in the town of West Springfield, MA. The project is on the west bank of the Connecticut River, 76 miles above its mouth. (See Geological Survey maps for Springfield South and West Springfield, MA-CT). Existing project. This project consists of a system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approximately 24,500 feet in length. The system starts at high ground, in the vicinity of Harrison Place, and extends downstream along the Connecticut River and up the north bank of the Westfield River to high ground at the Boston & Albany Railroad. The work involved raising 13,700 feet of existing levee, constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall, improving 2,400 feet of river bank, and treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities were also constructed for the disposal of interior drainage. The project, with the approved plan of reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The levee and floodwall grades are, at all points, above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. A modification to the project was authorized in October 1982 providing for the raising of the floodwall sections by one foot and the provision of a flood forecasting system. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938. The project is complete. Construction of the prior project work was initiated in March 1939 and completed in July 1942 with the exception of foundation treatment along the Westfield River south of Agawam Bridge, which was initiated in May 1947 and completed in November 1947, and relief well and drainage system, which was initiated in August 1952 and completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Local interests continued acquisition of easements needed for installation of field equipment that will become part of flood warning system. 30. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Authorized improvements in Housatonic River Basin are comprised of seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and seven local protection projects, five of which are along Naugatuck River, one on Housatonic River and one on Still River. Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at Alford, Green River, MA and at Sheffield, MA, and Salisbury, CT along the Housatonic were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. A project for local flood protection along the Housatonic River in Pittsfield, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project; also Table 1-M on dams and reservoirs and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin). 30A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was awarded in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 1 14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 30B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 3975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and ap urtenanat structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 30C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the Control House roof at six damsites was awarded in April 1985 and completed in November 1985. Total contract amount was $23,985 of which $3,215 was for the Hop Brook Lake replacement. 30D. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 30E. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was started in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract to perform remedial measures for seepage control awarded in September 1985 was completed in December 1985. Final contract amount was $198,837. A contract to replace the Control House roof at six damsites was awarded in April 1985 and completed in November 1985. Total contract amount was $23,985 of which $2,965 was for the Thomaston Dam replacement. 31. COVERED BRIDGE, HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MA Location. The town of Sheffield is located in the southwestern corner of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, approximately 7.5 miles east of the Massachusetts - New York state line and about 4.2 miles north of the Massachusetts - Connecticut state line. Existing project. Construct a 70-foot long stone apron to protect the slopes and bottom of the bridge channel. Also, a total of approximately 500 linear feet of riprap to be located upstream and downstream from the bridge on both riverbanks. Local cooperation. Assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal limitation of $250,000; provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion, without cost to the United States; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project design, including preparation of contract plans and specifications, was completed. Formal local cooperation agreement was signed and Required Contributed Funds of $180,000 were received. A construction contract award in amount of $345,675 was made on 8 September 1986. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 1-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 32. GULF STREET AND TRUMBULL AVENUE, MILFORD, CT Location. The city of Milford, is located in the southwest corner of New Haven County, in southwestern Connecticut. The erosion site at Gulf Street is located immediately to the southeast of Milford harbor and the site at Trumbull Avenue is located immediately to the southwest of Milford Harbor. Existing project. Shoreline protection measures will consist of construction of stone slope protection for the 140 foot long reach of shoreline, roadway and associated utilities. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project was readvertised and contract award in amount of $174,200 was made on 21 April 1986. Notice to proceed was not given until 12 August. Actual work had not begun by fiscal year end since contractor was preparing a proposal for precast concrete grid block revetment in lieu of stone slope protection. 33. PORT 5 FACILITY, BRIDGEPORT, CT Location. The Naval Veterans Port 5 Facility is located in the city of Bridgeport in coastal southwestern Connecticut, specifically on a peninsula extending from the right bank at the mouth of Cedar Creek and facing south toward Black Rock Harbor and Long Island Sound. Existing project. Provides for protection of Naval Veterans property against further shoreline erosion from wave action by placement of 250 linear feet of graded riprap slope protection. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation and maintenance manual was prepared and furnished to local interests for their use. Project was fiscally completed and closed out. 34. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system for four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works included for construction under comprehensive plan). 34A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, NH, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 12.5 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in November 1985 for installation of log boom anchors at three damsites was completed in January 1986. Total contract amount was $20,445 of which $6,545 was for the Blackwater Dam installation. A contract to replace the emergency generator at three damsites was awarded in March 1986 and was 80 percent complete at fiscal year end. Total contract amount is $67,000. 34B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Manadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repaint the service bridge and floodgates was awarded in February 1986 and was 70 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contract amount is expected to be $30,000 pending modifications. 34C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, NH, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 212 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded last fiscal year for repainting the service bridge was completed in October 1985. Contract amount was $8,600. A contract awarded in November 1985 for installation of log boom anchors at three damsites was completed in January 1986. Total contract amount was $20,445 of which $10,625 was for the Franklin Falls Dam installation. 34D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, NH, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, NH, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract awarded in November 1985 for installation of log boom anchors at three damsites was completed in January 1986. Total contract amount was $20,445 of which $3,275 was for the Hopkington Lake installation. A contract in the amount of $67,000 to replace the emergency generator at three damsites was awarded in March 1986 and was 80 percent complete at fiscal year end. 35. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operating costs included $106,226 for project operations; $4,085 for administrative activities and $4,722 for completion of the five year periodic inspection. 36. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT, about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT). Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls will be 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures will include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Latest estimate (December 1984) for the project is $10,860,000 for construction and $1,140,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $12,000,000 for new work. Total includes local costs of $1,140,000 for lands and relocations and a $2,310,000 cash contribution. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project is under construction and is approximately 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations; (c) bear 30 percent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Assurances have been provided. 1-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations during fiscal year. New work: Administrative close-out of the Part V contract was made. Final contract earnings totaled $973,765. The Part VI contract was completed in May 1986. Contract earnings to date are $1,054,650 pending modifications. Project dedication was held on 1 August 1986. 37. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Comprehensive plan for water resources development within the basin was comprised of the multiple-purpose Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs on the upper Saint John River. Projects were authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 substantially in accordance with plans included in report of Department of Interior and Corps of Engineers dated August 1964 which is supplement to July 1963 report of International Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project and Upper Saint John River Hydroelectric Power Development. *The Dickey Dam component of the project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128 on 29 December 1981. Local protection project at Fort Kent authorized by Chief of Engineers on 25 September 1975 in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-F at end of chapter for authorized multiple-purpose projects including power). 38. MARGINAL WAY, OGUNQUIT, ME Location. The town of Ogunquit is located within York County along the coast of southern Maine about 15 miles north of Portsmouth, New Hampshire and 40 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. Marginal Way is a public footpath that starts near the center of town and follows the edge of the ocean atop rugged cliffs to Perkins Cove. The walkway is about a mile and a half long and was constructed in 1926. Existing project. Construction of 240 linear feet of 42- inch thick stone slope protection along the unprotected portion of the walkway which is adjacent to and just north of the rebuilt section. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; insure that erosion conditions along portions of Marginal Way, outside the limits of the proposed Corps project, are protected and properly maintained; maintain Marginal Way as a public walkway. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract in the amount of $182,600 was awarded in September 1986. Work has not yet begun. 39. PENOBSCOT RIVER, OLD TOWN, ME Location. The town of Old Town, Maine is located on Indian Island along the Penobscot River in south-central Maine about 14 miles northeast of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. The project consists of modification of two existing earth dike structures. These dikes, located on the left and right banks of Indian Island just beyond the access road bridge are 560 and 700 feet long, respectively. The modifications include raising the existing top elevation from about 107 feet to 110 feet and providing rock slope protection at the riverside face. In addition, more adequate interior drainage facilities, consisting of two 18-inch gated drainage lines and two portable pumps to discharge interior runoff will be provided. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The contract awarded in September 1985 for remedial measures was completed in December 1985. Final contract amount was $19,948. 40. PLEASANT POINT, PERRY, ME Location. The town of Perry is located within Washington County along the coast of northeastern Maine about 126 miles east of Bangor, Maine and 20 miles south of Calais, Maine. Existing project. The project consists of 800 linear feet of stone slope protection. The stone is placed on a slope of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal and extends from mean high tide up to the height of expected storm wave runup. A gravel walkway will run along the top of the stone protection. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract in the amount of $126,765 was awarded in September 1986. Work has not yet begun. 41. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidal-waters, and all changes, alterations 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $4,340,000 and consisting of cost items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $3,150,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the United States, an amount estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 42. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan). 42A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract to replace the Utility Building heating system awarded in June 1985 was completed in November 1985. Contract amount was $14,500. A contract in the amount of $17,900 to repaint the flood control gates was awarded in February 1986 and completed in September 1986. 42B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield MA, and Warren, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the emergency generator was awarded in March 1986 and was 80 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contract amount is expected to be $24,000 pending modifications. 42C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about 5 miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract to replace the emergency generator awarded in February 1985 was completed in December 1985. Contract amount was $23,820. 42D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract to replace the Control House roof at six damsites awarded in April 1985 was completed in November 1985. Total contract amount was $23,985 of which $4,230 was for the Mansfield Hollow Lake replacement. 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 42E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract for miscellaneous repairs to the service bridge awarded in May 1985 was completed in May 1986. Final contract amount was $34,803. A contract for construction of a storage building was awarded in April 1986 and was 75 percent complete at fiscal year end. Contract amount is $57,960. 42F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract to replace the emergency generator awarded in March 1985 was completed in October 1985. Contract amount was $19,222. The contract to replace the Control House roof at six damsites awarded in April 1985 was completed in November 1985. Total contract amount was $23,985 of which $4,785 was for the Westville Lake replacement. The contract to replace the Gatehouse furnace and Utility Building boiler awarded in May 1985 was completed in October 1985. Contract amount was $10,900. A contract for restroom renovations was awarded in March 1986 and completed in August 1986. Contract amount was $23,984. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: October 1985 and May 1986 - Ansonia, Derby, East Hartford, Hartford New London, Pawcatuck, Stamford; April 1986 - Bridgeport, Colchester/ East Hampton, North Canaan, Salisbury, Torrington, Winsted, Woodbury; May 1986 - Danbury, East Branch, Hall Meadow, Mad River, New Fairfield, Norwalk, Sucker Brook, Waterbury, Wethersfield. MAINE: May 1986 - Beals, Blaine, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Harpswell, Hartland, Indian Island, Islesboro, Lubec, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: October 1985 and April 1986 - Gardner, Haverhill, Lowell; October 1985 and May 1986 -Charles River Dam, Chicopee, Fitchburg, Holyoke, Northampton, Springfield, West Springfield; November 1985 and May 1986 - Saxonville; April 1986 - Alford, Canton, Lee, Pittsfield, Scituate, Sheffield, Three Rivers, West Warren, Worcester; May 1986 - Amesbury, Blackstone, Haywood Creek, Huntington, Lancaster, Quincy, Ware, Weymouth-Braintree. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 1985 - Keene; October 1985 and May 1986 - Nashua; April 1986 - Lincoln, Shelburne, Wilton;May 1986 - Charlestown, Farmington, North Stratford, West Stewartstown. RHODE ISLAND: October 1985 and May 1986 - Woonsocket. VERMONT: May 1986 - Rockingham, Weston. 44. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in nature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of floodflows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. On 26-27 January 1986, a complex storm system deposited between 2 to 4 inches of rain over central New England. Because many of the rivers and streams were frozen, the runoff from this storm caused several rivers to rise near flood stage. Corps reservoirs at these sites were throttled as a result of this condition and limited releases were made to empty the reservoirs without causing flows to exceed the reduced downstream channel capacities. The operation resulted in several Corps projects holding water longer than normal and hence significant storages were experienced at many of the Corps reservoirs. A second event, during the month of March, was caused by about 2 inches of rainfall during snowmelt in central Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont. Rivers rose to near bankfull capacity, and several Corps reservoirs stored significant amounts of runoff; however, no serious flooding was attributed to this storm. During 5-8 June 1986, 3 to 6 inches of rain fell on southern New England, with an unusual 9.2 inches occurring at Colebrook Lake, CT. Corps reservoirs were throttied in anticipation of this storm, however, dry antecedent conditions prevented any significant problems and no flooding occurred downstream of our reservoirs. 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Connecticut River Basin Storages at Corps reservoirs for the March event were 33 percent of capacity at Ball Mountain, 31, percent at Surry Mountain, 30 percent at Otter Brook, 28 percent at Townshend and 25 percent at Knightville. Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain and Townshend - October 1985 and May 1986, Birch Hill and Tully - April 1986 and Knightville and Littleville - April 1986. Water supply releases were made throughout the year at Colebrook Lake. Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake have been controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower during most of FY 1986. Merrimack River Basin Regulation of reservoirs in the Merrimack River Basin for the 26-27 January storm resulted in peak storages at MacDowell Lake - 41 percent, Franklin Falls - 28 percent and Blackwater Dam - 17 percent. Runoff was stored at Blackwater Dam in April in order to provide sufficient flows for canoeing activities on 12-13 April. Thames River Basin There were no important events in the Thames River Basin during FY 1986, however, reservoir storages amounting to 20 percent and 19 percent were experienced at Westville and Buffumville, respectively, in March 1986. Other regulation activities in the basin included regulation for canoeing at Mansfield Hollow in June and September and at East Brimfield and Westville in April. Also, the permanent pool at West Thompson was raised on several occasions during FY 1986 to accommodate AKC retreiver trials and powerboat competitions. Housatonic River Basin Regulation of the reservoirs in the Naugatuck River Basin in January 1986 resulted in peak storages at Black Rock - 22 percent and Thomaston - 16 percent. The peak storage at Hop Brook occurred in March 1986 and amounted to 18 percent. Blackstone River Basin West Hill Dam, in the Blackstone River Basin, utilized 24 percent of storage in June of 1986. 45. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers, including the recently completed New London Hurricane Barrier, are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes or severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and the New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and the Pawcatuck and New London, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: Stamford Barrier. The barrier gates were operated on nine occasions for coastal storms, and prevented $25,000 in damages during FY 1986. New Bedford Barrier. The New Bedford Barrier was operated on three occasions for coastal storms and prevented $25,000 in damages during FY 1986. Fox Point Hurricane Barrier. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1986 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1986 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. New London Hurricane Barrier. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1986 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. 46. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter). 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J at end of chapter). Snagging and clearing activites pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Konkapot River, North Canaan, CT $ 14,895 Pawtuxet River, Cranston, RI 5,500 Quinnipiac River, North Haven, CT 7,500 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Baker River, Warren, NH 6,000 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 128,528 (See Section 28A of Text) Clear River, Burrillville, RI 7,180 (See Section 28B of Text) Clesson Brook, Buckland, MA 5,000 Connecticut River, Walpole, NH 7,500 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 455 Connecticut River, Cornish, NH 7,500 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 2,073 (See Section 31 of Text) Factory Brook, Middlefield, MA 396 Falulah Brook, Fitchburg, MA 7,500 Fort Trumbull Beach, Milford, CT 10,309 George Street, Keene, NH 7,500 Machias River, Machias, ME 31,996 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 22,784 (See Section 38 of Text) Merrimack River, Concord, NH 5,000 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 23,188 (See Section 29I of Text) 1-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Narraguagus River, Cherryfield, ME 6,000 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 46,949 (See Section 40 of Text) Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 7,349 (See Section 33 of Text) Saxtons River, Rockingham, VT 6,700 South River, Conway, MA 28,263 (See Section 29N of Text) Ware River, MA 7,000 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and lescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $111,652 for disaster preparedness and $86,286 for rehabilitation work in Farmington, NH. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 as amended in 1976 (Section 32 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. P.L. 93-251). There were no fiscal year costs for demonstration project proposals. Total costs to 30 September 1986 were $1,204,996. 48. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter). General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $1,601,331 of which $201,287 was for four navigation studies; $211,371 for three flood damage prevention studies; $4,712 for one special study; $785,410 for three comprehensive studies; $84,940 for review of three completed or deferred projects; $313,611 for coordination studies. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with developments in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $14,889. Total costs to 30 September 1986 were $179,423. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $192,225. Total costs to 30 September 1986 are $4,944,625. 51. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Total costs for continuation of Planning and Engineering were $305,023 of which $13,349 was for channels and harbors and $291,674 for local protection. The channels and harbor study was at Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The continuing local protection studies were for Town Brook in Quincy, Massachusetts and for Roughans Point in Revere, Massachusetts. 52. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and design costs were $34,807 for the beach erosion control project at Revere Beach, Massachusetts and $64,396 for the navigation project at Bristol Harbor, RI. 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Black Rock Harbor, CT 3. Bristol Harbor Bristol, RI 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 5. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (Contributed Funds) 6. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 7. Hampton Harbor, NH (Contributed Funds) 8. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 10,000 2,093 1,426,000 1,244,713 8,575 7,995 79,359 242,071 40,000 36,134 22,900 22,180 30,000 31,931 245,496 243,559 23,000 1,551,259 23,000 1,531,964 113,000 64,396 351,288 302,684 1,654 1,654 -9,000 75,308 - 32,786,7501,2 - 32,786,2191,2 4,541,756 4,865,718 6,469,630 6,093,171 86,696,584 5,043,968 5,311,711 6,765,682 6,101,729 86,426,774 - - - - 115,432 - - - - 115,432 874,000 930,549 14,269 2,011,524 1,775,602 695,246 3,387,864 305,561 272,598 154,525 192,598 168 177,567 179,124 254,900 264,505 - 390,677 - 390,677 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 1,541,1853,4 - 1,541,1853,4 129,792 14,744,3015 118,673 14,733,1645 - 60,000 - 60,000 - 130,410 - 130,410 - 254,512 - 254,512 58,116 1,765,299 44,232 1,740,379 9,658 11,700 13,301 12,946 12,946 1-25 317,558 311,599 18,398 18,398 -6,000 357,454 339,813 168,000 168,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 4,000 1,762,216 3,587 1,761,761 15,184 16,473 193,761 193,761 484,499 484,499 641,1956 624,8436 103,001 103,001 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 9. Jonesport Harbor, ME 10. Kennebec River, ME 11. Mystic River, MA 12. New Haven Harbor, CT 13. New London Harbor, CT 14. Newburyport Harbor, MA 15. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (Contributed Funds) 16. Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 25,000 8,160 8,956 9,422 50,132 9,148 2,678,304 2,437,301 697,825 680,448 2,463,926 722,522 25,000 13.889 12,791 62,474 648,500 971,281 773,584 772.839 -19,652 6,305 -125,695 612,029 40,000 3,725 22,003 22,003 46,404 44,013 106,071 103,063 176,641 177.322 21,243 24,225 -358,831 644,031 205,000 510,000 261,017 501,179 - 1,599,940 7 - 1,599,940 7 422,302 2,215,058 421,393 2,214,149 - 3,222,777 - 3,222,777 -10,000 1,964,740 - 7,106 1,964,740 - 4,205,2468 - 4,205,2468 22,564 12,789,7249 25,795 12,788,9749 - 638,77410 - 638,77410 582,206 1,810,465 582,270 1,810,465 569,225 569,225 34,909 4,095,461 36,759 4,094,948 - 1,415,524 - 1,415,524 - 2,714,51011 - 2,714,510" 426,000 3,842,884 425,264 3,838,388 - 1,926,000 - 1,926,000 - 17,587 - 17,587 50,000 47,420 39,000 72,000 69,420 194,963 194,963 39,000 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 17. Royal River, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds-Other) 18. Saco River, ME 23. Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 24. Revere Beach, MA (Contributed Funds) 28A. Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 28B. Clear River, Burrillville, RI 28C. Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 28D. West Hill Dam, MA 28E. Charles River (Natural Valley) Storage Areas), MA 29A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 29B. Barre Falls Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 31,116 31,116 223,772 204,072 149,965 169,051 336,704 336,704 661,22712 660,61312 49,562 49,562 18,000 18,000 15,000 211,293 316 820,000 49,884 -5,000 8,194 9,891 9,891 59,880 50,176 - 1,064,983 - 1,064,983 78,829 1,644,971 88,333 1,644,771 -770,000 116 - - 230,000 - - 195,093 - 47,500 202,500 - 34,149 84,277 - - 50,000 - - 40,704 770,000 1,015,000 1,375,000 635,554 1,128,982 1,151,872 150,650 168,669 615,000 567,600 16,000 176,430 256,800 255,273 243,000 243,211 182,000 171,654 125,000 118,167 132,000 120,973 4,000 3,872 354,000 341,628 252,000 240,017 212,700 196,959 140,000 177,899 144,000 149,099 336 698 588,800 456,093 416,600 378,002 50,000 50,000 - 483,71213 34,807 483,61213 - 142,965 - 142,965 - 250,000 128,528 246,954 130,000 180,000 7,180 47,884 - 3,300,000 133,022 3,171,022 - 2,306,90214 - 2,306,90214 264,000 2,724,234 243,999 2,678,065 191,000 8,606,000 96,871 8,474,187 198,000 474,000 156,239 426,311 - 11,039,29815 - 11,039,29815 606,000 5,477,739 660,207 5,375,592 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 405,000 3,686,627 334,097 3,550,419 1-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 29C. Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 29D. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 29E. Colebrook River Lake, CT 29F. Conant Brook Dam, MA 29G. Knightville Dam, MA 29H. Littleville Lake, MA 29I. Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 29J. North Hartland Lake, VT 29K. North Springfield Lake, VT 29L. Otter Brook Lake, NH 29M. Park River, Hartford, CT (Other Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 65,000 87,689 278,400 328,596 111,500 129,544 48,000 54,350 231,200 305,915 222,000 216,117 50,000 22,795 230,000 204,543 107,000 104,747 82,000 76,250 588,000 465,260 237,000 251,701 236,000 1,775,000 2,286,000 223,473 1,731,994 2,195,868 - - 4,815,67916 - - 4,815,67916 230,800 217,000 3,767,727 261,717 215,317 3,758,725 - - 32,00017 - - 32,00017 - - 14,263,971 - - 14,263,971 150,900 190,000 1,999,444 159,338 185,002 1,988,190 - - 2,950,530 - - 2,950,530 59,000 126,000 1,080,680 55,768 115,990 1,061,526 - - 3,415,64018 - - 3,415,64018 349,400 296,000 4,928,904 490,983 301,828 4,919,099 248,800 250,330 - 7,013,412 - 7,013,412 464,000 3,209,891 290,889 3,029,404 38,000 23,188 229,600 232,025 270,300 280,799 13,000 148,619 352,300 341,681 75,000 67,401 301,000 281,472 312,000 309,613 2,000 2,525 339,000 321,897 225,000 233,110 329,700 325,812 818,000 715,240 401,300 333,319 54,889 13,408 38,000 23,188 - 7,312,22519 - 7,312,22519 279,000 3,772,815 264,351 3,725,756 - 6,831,52620 - 6,831,52620 861,000 5,982,097 972,541 5,969,220 - 4,360,44821 - 4,360,44821 356,000 3,719,614 448,103 3,699,340 - 60,176,919 -8,733 60,156,007 24,415 259,408 259,408 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 29N. South River New Work Conway, MA 290. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 29P. Townsend Lake, VT 29Q. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 29R. Union Village Dam, VT 29S. West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 30A. Black Rock Lake, CT 30B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 30C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 30D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 364,000 369,268 235,000 241,188 244,500 256,745 204,700 241,811 215,000 58,510 192,200 186,989 61,500 65,798 307,550 312,547 12,961 122,500 118,349 394,000 403,328 289,000 266,179 285,000 279,572 293,000 284,628 112,162 13,000 181,000 178,239 79,000 77,599 382,000 379,251 129,000 117,350 391,300 373,176 673,900 569,734 371,900 297,333 250,700 243,528 12,169 162,000 170,351 94,400 96,252 375,400 321,003 156,800 151,456 50,000 28,263 50,000 28,263 - 2,833,61022 - 2,833,61022 280,000 4,493,443 294,216 4,469,588 - 7,398,41323 - 7,398,41323 472,000 5,076,471 541,835 5,001,846 - 1,666,75224 - 1,666,75224 313,000 3,599,986 310,633 3,500,316 - 40,000'7 - 40,00017 - 4,095,16025 - 4,095,16025 216,000 3,525,556 243,036 3,517,290 - 215,000 37 182,878 - 13,000 - 8,182,300 - 8,182,300 191,000 2,170,609 172,852 2,150,622 - 4,178,911 - 4,178,911 84,000 1,075,649 80,751 1,072,327 - 6,151,56226 - 6,151,56226 531,000 3,930,885 499,564 3,822,817 - 2,850,51227 - 2,850,51227 200,000 1,647,711 202,038 1,624,661 1-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 30E. Thomaston Dam. New Work CT 31. Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 32. Gulf Street and Trumbull Avenue, Milford, CT 33. Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 34A. Blackwater Dam, NH 34B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 34C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 34D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 35. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 36. New London, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 237,000 241,314 12,000 11,982 32,500 27,705 224,000 234,591 254,000 236,598 35,000 33,286 207,000 171,445 167,000 165,282 171,600 205,000 169,835 207,435 438,000 325,000 434,604 336,139 533,900 429,000 564,139 428,898 509,000 202,000 475,213 330,791 1,160,000 1,018,945 140,000 165,095 36,008 825,000 625,839 300,000 93,884 84,750 58,208 588,500 405,293 660 48,500 38,921 -12,000 21,001 193,200 197,527 232,600 229,583 562,100 563,698 568,800 489,672 227,750 230,766 350,000 540,331 65,000 218,246 37,640 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 343,000 4,292,767 533,544 4,272,558 50,000 2,073 97,000 48,001 X0,000 238,500 10,309 49,230 - 227,500 7,349 227,500 - 1,319,74628 - 1,319,74628 248,000 2,850,985 213,093 2,815,144 - 2,014,25329 - 2,014,25329 277,000 3,371,392 254,523 3,330,649 - 7,950,48730 - 7,950,48730 367,000 5,394,137 438,508 5,378,883 - 21,452,44031 - 21,452,44031 512,500 6,188,540 502,046 6,080,454 - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 120,000 3,559,864 115,033 3,552,533 - 6,513,76332 - 6,513,76332 - 9,272,046 124,061 9,243,190 - 2,255,00033 54,932 2,251,31433 6,500 3,500 222,250 219,250 1-30 19 1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 38. Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 39. Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 40. Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 41. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 42A. Buffumville Lake, MA 42B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 42C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 42D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 42E. West Thompson Lake, CT New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 32,500 13,081 40,000 4,923 121,000 120,960 341,000 150,264 239,000 253,141 170,000 179,248 225,300 203,446 203,000 228,848 3,000 19,708 477,800 434,456 190,000 364,097 297,000 305,796 164,000 137,426 308,000 291,612 207,000 204,938 480 320,000 376,345 210,000 207,808 312,400 292,103 191,100 208,938 195 195 350,800 350,711 239,500 244,183 317,300 301,293 30,000 22,784 24,940 63,000 46,949 62,500 35,865 188,045 177,908 63,000 46,949 - 9,911,300 - 9,900,618 156,000 2,458,372 185,598 2,450,647 - 3,367,97034 - 3,367,45334 - 210,000 - 209,969 - 2,998,60335 - 2,998,60335 243,000 3,089,322 256,020 3,079,022 - 7,057,04336 - 7,057,04336 215,000 2,520,683 211,889 2,506,943 - 4,461,26837 - 4,461,26837 271,500 2,984,098 295,212 2,959,888 - 6,447,16438 - 6,447,16438 178,000 3,090,797 173,872 3,085,172 - 7,001,22039 - 7,001,22039 423,000 3,356,998 423,571 3,333,795 1-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 42F. Westville Lake, New Work MA Approp. - - - - 5,684,68340 Cost - - - - 5,684,68340 Maint. Approp. 213,000 243,000 373,300 382,000 3,069,096 Cost 199,653 199,852 377,556 342,850 2,969,751 SIncludes $6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Includes $287,374 for previous projects. 4 Excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT". 5 Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 6 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1961. 7 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. s Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. 9 Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 10 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 11 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 12 Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. 14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 15 Includes $504,060 Code 711 funds. 16 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 17 Recreational cost sharing. 18 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $229,436 code 711 funds. 20 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 2 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 24 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. Zs Includes $88,932 Code 711 funds. Z Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 29 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $179,728 Code 711 funds. 32 Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 33 Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land condemnations. 3 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 3 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 37 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. 3 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 3 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 40 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1930 August 13, 1968 Jan. 21, 1927 (Sec. 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sept. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program. May 28, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 19503 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960 as amended in 1965 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section I of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BLACK ROCK HARBOR, CT (See Section 2 of Text). Black Rock Harbor 18 feet deep and 100 to 200 feet wide from the 18-foot contour in harbor to the heads of both branches of Cedar Creek, about 2.4 miles. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, RI (See Section 3 of Text). Construction of a rubblestone breakwater 1,600 feet long CAPE COD CANAL, MA. (See Section 4 of Text). Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct 3 bridges and widen canal to 250 feet Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of 8 feet. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT (See Section 5 of Text). Jetties at the mouth The Hartford dike. Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook Bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook Channel, anchorage, and turning basin, Eightmile River. Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH (See Section 7 of Text) Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. H. Doc. 281, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 174, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168 85th Cong. 1st sess. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st. Cong.,3rd sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 49, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, Apr. 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368, 76th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 666, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 4 P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1961. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1960. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 15, 1965. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1964. 1-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Oct. 17, 1940 July 13, 1892 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19355 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16, 1949 Aug. 9, 1955 June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 22, 1976 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 8 of Text) Breakwater. Present dimensions of breakwater. Dredging behind breakwater. Channel, anchorage and jetty. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME. (See Section 9 of Text). A steel sheetpile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of 9-acres; 6 feet deep and 6 acres 8 feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME (See Section 10 of Text). Channel between Augusta and Gardiner, ME Channel below Gardiner, ME Channel west of Swan Island. 27-foot channel from mouth of Bath. MYSTIC RIVER, MA (See Section 11 of Text). Improve upper Mystic Improve channel downstream from mouth of Island End River to 35-foot channel of Boston Harbor. Improve channel upstream from mouth of Island End River to city playground at Charlestown. Improve channel upstream from city playground at Charlestown to a point 800 feet above Malden Bridge. Improve channel from upper limit of 35-foot Boston Harbor channel to Malden Bridge. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT (See Section 12 of Text) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Brewery Street channel, removal of rocks in Morris Cove and present project dimensions of 15-foot basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25-foot channel 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage and 22-foot channel and turning basin in Quinnipiac River. Brewery Street channel declared nonnavigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. NEW LONDON HARBOR, CT (See Section 13 of Text). Waterfront channel and branch channels in Winthrop Cove and east of Central Vermont Railroad pier. Dredging in Shaws Cove. Entrance channel. Maneuvering area and present project extent of entrance channel. Deepening existing channel to 40 feet; providing a 40-acre turning basin 30 feet deep and a 4.9-acre maneuvering area 32 feet deep. (Phase I Authorization) NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA. (See section 14 of Text). Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. Dredging channel from sea to wharves and a widened turning basin. 1-34 S. Doc. 32, 18th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. 23 Sept. 76 and S. Res. 1 Oct. 76 pursuant to Sec. 201 of cited Act. H. Doc. 262, 56th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 321, 59th Cong. 2nd sess.4 H. Doc. 746, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 4 S. Doc. 55, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 4 Annual Report, 1891, p. 672. H. Doc. 1086, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee. Doc. 33, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 542, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 645, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. 6 Plans approved by a Board of Engineers, Oct. 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1159, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. 4 H. Doc. 392, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 329, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 613, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.4 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 82, 74th Cong., 2nd sess.4 Chief of Engineers report dated February 20, 1975. Annual Report 1910, p. 59. H. Doc. 703, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 16, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended June 13, 1902 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 3, 1871 River and Harbor Act 1882 July 14, 1960, as amended in 1965 Mar. 2, 1827 June 23, 1866 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960, as amended May 17, 1951 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 July 24, 1946, as amended. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI (See Section 15 of Text). The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing 3 shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. ROCKPORT HARBOR, MASS. (See Section 16 of Text). Rebuilding two breakwaters at entrance and removing principal rocks in harbor. An access channel - 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide. Two outer harbor anchorages between the breakwater and the town wharf. Pigeon Cove consists of 75-foot wide channel - 10 feet deep; dredge anchorage area north of channel to -8 feet. ROYAL RIVER, ME (See Section 17 of Text). Enlargement of channel through bar at Gravel Point and removal of several ledges near Yarmouth. Construction of 195-foot rubblestone jetty and dredging channel. 8 foot channel, 80 feet wide and anchorage. SACO RIVER, ME (See Section 18 of Text). Extension of piers, placing of buoys, and removal of obstructions at entrance to harbor. Breakwater on north side of mouth of river. Jetty on north side of mouth of river. Channel improvements and jetty extension on south side of mouth of river. Present project channel dimensions and extensions of north breakwater about 1,600 feet. Extension of north breakwater to Sharps Ledge. Anchorage and maneuvering basin. LYNN-NAHANT BEACH, MA (See Section 23 of Text) Artificial placement of approximately 172,000 cubic yards of sand and construction of a stone mound along the tombolo for approximately 6,250 feet. REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 24 of Text). Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill BLACKSTONE RIVER, MILLBURY, MA (See Section 28A of Text). Remove existing shoal and construct stone slope protection along both banks of the Blackstone River to prevent further erosion and possible loss of the McCraken Road bridge. H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sept. 29, 1976. H. Doc. 363, 56th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, March 27, 1986. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 27, 1965. S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1884, p. 482 H. Doc. 752, 61st Cong., 2nd sess.4 H. Doc. 477, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee. Doc. 11, 74th Cong., 1st sess.4 P.L. 86-645. Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 14, 1967. H. Doc. 134, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act of 1954 dated September 3, 1954. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. 15 Dec. 70 and S. Res. 17 Dec. 70 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 29, 1984. 1-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 30, 1948, as amended. July 24, 1946, as amended Aug. 13, 1968 July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946. as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 3, 1958 CLEAR RIVER, BURRILLVILLE, RI (See Section 28B of Text). Remove approximately 60 linear feet of granite retaining wall, damaged from erosion, and construct a new mortared stone wall. PAWTUXET RIVER, WARWICK, RI (See Section 28C of Text). Flood damage reduction through acquisition of land and improvements in the flood plain. Demolition and removal of acquired structures. Flood proofing certain dwellings and installing a flood forecasting system. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE) AREAS), MA (See Section 28E of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. BEAVER BROOK, KEENE, NH (See Section 29C of Text). Construct improvements to reduce the damaging effects of floods. MILL BROOK, BROWNSVILLE, VT (See Section 291 of Text). Clear lower portion of bank and fill with compacted gravel. Protect bank with layer of "tri-lock" grid blocks extended approximately 9 feet above channel bed. PARK RIVER, HARTFORD, CT (See Section 29M of Text). Flood protection on Park River in Hartford, CT. SOUTH RIVER, CONWAY, MA (See Section 29N of Text) Site 2 protection consisting of 3-foot thick uniform stone layer; site 3 terraced slope refilled with compacted random fill. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 29S of Text). Raise the floodwall section of the West Springfield project by 1 foot in combination with a flood forecasting system. COVERED BRIDGE, HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MA (See Section 31 of Text). Construct 70-foot long stone apron. On both banks upstream and downstream of bridge, place riprap along 500 linear feet. GULF STREET AND TRUMBULL AVENUE, MILFORD, CT. (See Section 32 of Text). Construction of stone slope protection. PORT 5 FACILITY, BRIDGEPORT, CT (See Section 33 of Text). 250 linear feet of graded riprap slope protection. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 35 of Text). Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 15, 1985. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized Chief of Engineers, July 12, 1982. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 21, 1985. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 23, 1986. S. Doc. 43, 90th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 1, 1986. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 5, 1982. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by by Chief of Engineers, July 24, 1984 P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. September 11, 1984. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 26, 1983. S. Doc. 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 36 of Text). Oct. 23, 1962 Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Oct. 22, 1976 tidal damage. MARGINAL WAY, OGUNQUIT, ME (See Section 38 of Text) July 24, 1946 Place 2-foot layer of armor stone along the 150-foot section P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized as amended of walkway. Construct 150 linear feet of 42-inch thick stone by Chief of Engineers, May 7, 1986. slope along walkway. PENOBSCOT RIVER, OLD TOWN, ME (See Section 39 of Text). June 30, 1948, Modification of two existing earth dike structures. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 20, 1974. June 30, 1948, Repair settling of the inlet and/or outlet structures P.L. 80-858, Section 205. as amended and reinforced concrete pipe of east Authorized by Chief of Engineers, and west dikes. May 16, 1985. PLEASANT POINT, PERRY, ME (See Section 40 of Text) July 24, 1946, Construct precast concrete modular wall stacked to 6-foot P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized as amended height along 600 feet of shorefront. by Chief of Engineers, July 31, 1986. STAMFORD, CT (See Section 41 of Text). July 14, 1960 Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. damage. Removal of one ledge inactive. 2 Quinnipiac River 22-foot channel and turning basin deferred for restudy. SInactive. SContains latest maps. S Also Emergency Relief Act of 1935. 6 Contains latest published map; a map showing entire river is in H. Doc. 2108, 64th Cong., 2nd session. 7 Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 1-37 TABLE 1-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA,'615 Apponaug Cove, RI',6 Bagaduce River, ME3,4, 5 Bar Harbor, ME6 Bass Harbor, ME' 6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH1,3, 4 Beverly Harbor, MA' Boothbay Harbor, ME' Boston Harbor, MA', 22 Branford Harbor, CT' Bridgeport Harbor, CT5 Bristol Harbor, RI Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME',6 Bucksport Harbor, ME' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME',6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA',6 Camden Harbor, ME 1' Canapitsit Channel, MA1, 4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' Cathance River, ME', 3 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA' Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI', 4 Cobscook Bay, ME1,3, 4 Cocheco River, NH',a,4 Cohasset Harbor, MA' Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT8 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME' 6 Criehaven Harbor, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA' Damariscotta River, ME', 4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME' 4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA" Duck Island Harbor, CT' Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME' Eastport Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NH', 4 Fall River Harbor, MA' Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT 5 Frenchboro Harbor, ME' Georges River, ME' Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI'5 Greenwich Bay, RI' Greenwich Harbor, CT' Guilford Harbor, CT' Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI5 Harraseeket River, ME', 4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' Hendrick's Harbor, ME' Hingham Harbor, MA' Housatonic River, CT 5 1981 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1953 1984 1978 1983 1983 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1984 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1932 1984 1939 1954 1978 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1984 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1983 1893 1969 1983 1983 1896 1931 1957 1954 1983 $ 219,042 156,8742 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,56157 34,643 246,048 18,000 25,313,08353 9,537 4,491,11949 238,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 266,705 56 104,957 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,76738 116,324 797,954 40,776 24,200 27,167 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,29729 6,500 638,67547 65,61435 21,759 27,454 6,164,75740 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,93436 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 576,856 30,963 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 $ 415,395 21,679 39 2,187 21,475 12,175 48,014 252,763 16,821 22,983 9,820,68254 987,348 1,976,01750 1,654 16,838 13,593 76,667 28,406 183,74946 125,936 12,279 347,865 9,021 1,919,96056 952,564 13,161 42,617 219,713 15,822 73,150 8,125 54,328 964,07452 905 301,944 399,139 798,722 17,238 192,624 47,922 83,93814 3,032 2,064,76751 279,080 188,802 24,616 228,937 1,449,216 550,235 6,527 204,872 1,229,777 1,341,954 5,309 30,702 6,325 154,272 2,384,449 $ 187,500 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 127,000 11,643 35,00030 10,000 35,000 25,500 100,000 25,000 222,010 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Ipswich Harbor, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MA, " Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME' Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' Josias River, ME' Kennebunk River, ME' Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA' 6 Lamprey River, NH', 4 Little Harbor, NH',4,2 " Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA'"4 Lubec Channel, ME' Lynn Harbor, MA' 9 Machias River, ME' Malden River, MA',2- Matinicus Harbor, ME' Medomak River, ME' Menemsha Creek, MA' Merrimack River, MA' Mianus River, CT' Milford Harbor, CT5," Moosabec Bar, ME' Mystic River, CT' Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA5 Narraguagus River, ME' New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA5 New Harbor, ME' New Haven Breakwater, CT' Newport Harbor, RI' Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT',6 Northeast Harbor, ME' Norwalk Harbor, CT' Owl's Head Harbor, ME" Patchogue River, CT',22 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT5 Pawtuxet Cove, RI' Penobscot River, ME' Pepperell Cove, ME 5 Pig Island Gut, ME' 6 Pleasant Bay, MA Pleasant River, ME' Plymouth Harbor, MA' Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA' Portland Harbor, ME' Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua River, ME & NH',22 Potowomut River, RI' Providence River & Harbor, RI5 Provincetown Harbor, MA Red Brook Harbor, Bourne. MA"" Richmond Harbor, ME'.4 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME', 4 Rockland Harbor, ME" Rockport Harbor, ME'.' Rye Harbor, NH' St. Croix River, ME' Sakonnet Harbor, RI' Sakonnet River, RI''" Salem Harbor, MA5 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge). Cape Ann. MA 1969 1983 1980 1977 1977 1985 1895 1976 1913 1977 1906 1956 1956 1972 1922 1962 1953 1981 1940 1985 1981 1930 1957 1965 1969 1953 1966 1950 1953 1972 1954 1983 1968 1984 1978 1975 1985 1969 1966 1971 1892 1978 1956 1985 1984 1882 1976 1985 1972 1883 1882 1976 1915 1965 1950 1983 1909 1969 1922 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 115,565 261,417 8,940 99,098 19,980 133,227 18,000 380,322 755,576 32,000 104,853 14,00021 17,000 56,926 369,891 132,435 90,50658 11,400 197,582 502,66123 821,144 1,857,618 118,62024 1,242,246 733,524 66,464 138,942 531,12939 124,158 355,445 318,78731' 295,356 501,020 171,351 191,753 3,500 2,127,21832,31 1,083,504 9,588,71027 5,384,04312 5,000 25,417,02228 3,548,9544' 38,764 20,000 119,844 1,948,462 32,000 130,342 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 1-39 32,947 161,586 643,364 122,173 1,234,403 8,940 33,563 266,119 5,224 23,941 206,203 185,217 45,097 8,989 92,359 629,181 158,224 659,390 679,75959 25,227 104,932 444,606 71,087 708,967 26,944 40,273 128,223 71,570 51,032 3,723,52042 13,867 621,988 655,185 152,105 837,447 26,553 43,863 217 924,9013 4 846,590 7,903,331 1,936,959 50 3,830,502 1,053,966 1,808 452,800 54,520 128,453 36,392 180,016 9,549 390,326 16,060 314,50048 26,813 88,917 80,990 62,000 12,500 46,500 11,380 14,000 20,385 7,015 67,500 34,500 4,383 56,694 20,000 295,356 541,611 99,707 760,000 255,000 61,338' 7 19,892 21,928 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Sasanoa River, ME' 3,4 1915 35,000 124 Scarboro River, ME' 1976 392,635 1,239,293 10,000 Scituate Harbor, MA' 1971 379,851 130,391 69,976 Searsport Harbor, ME' 1966 572,56816 31,120 Seekonk River, RI' 1954 672,214 793,234 67,792 Sesuit Harbor, MA'",6 1983 226,306 24,704 124,588 South Bristol Harbor, ME' 1971 89,593 11,052 2,663 Southport Harbor, CT' 1962 96,9277 231,489 18,525 Southwest Harbor, ME' 1962 180,042 66,540 7,501 Stamford Harbor, CT5 1980 892,82437 1,683,02045 169,636 Stockton Harbor, ME',:, 4 1915 33,000 23,216 Stonington Harbor, CT' 1959 377,328 123,060 Stonington Harbor, ME'," 1985 898,500 5,067 Stony Creek, Branford, CT'," 1978 112,487 274,598 92,000 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' 1914 19,871- Taunton River, MA5 1948 442,895 32,917 Tenants Harbor, ME' 1920 18,750 13,292 Thames River, CT" 1967 1,471,919 1,527,151 Union River, ME,1' 1912 146,855 119,511 Vineyard Haven, MA' 1943 27,186 8,699 Wareham Harbor, MA 5 1896 95,997 10,296 Warren River, RI' 1890 5,000- Warwick Cove, R'11,6 1975 155,430 51,196 107,220 Wellfleet Harbor, MA' 1981 157,63425 894,584 32,000 Wells Harbor, ME' 1979 360,973 1,554,836 212,000 Westcott Cove, CT' 1978 55,960 217,309 21,000 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT5 1972 19,308 180,824 Westport River, MA4,9 1942 -- Weymouth Back River, MA' 1944 48,740 7,184 20,000 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., MA',22 1979 and 1983 30,194,61343 1,339,06844 630,133 Wickford Harbor, RI', 22 1973 233,410 70,435 49,094 Wilson Point Harbor, CT',4 1895 54,177- Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' 1952 7,500 29,870 Winter Harbor, ME'1,6 1976 162,937- Winthrop Harbor, MA' 1895 8,992 38,515 Wood Island Harbor, and Pool at Biddeford, ME' 1957 143,112 14,707 12,000 Woods Hole Channel, MA' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, ME' 1977 239,654 351,090 32,161 ' Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 5 Completed except for inactive portion. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 7 Includes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. Excludes $18,525 Contributed Funds, of which $1,785 was for work outside approved project. R Inactive. 9 Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. 'o Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. 1 Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete and an inactive portion. 12 Includes $130,393 for previous projects. '3 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107) is complete. 14 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. '5 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. '7 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds "Other" expended. 18 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 9 Improvement to be restudied. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 22 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 23 Excludes $211,649 expended for rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 25 Includes $11,350 for previous project. 26 H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminating maintenance dredging. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 27 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 28 Final fund adjustment made FY 1978 ($52,323.28). 29 Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 3� Excludes local requirementsof$65,000consistingof$13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. .' Includes $133,357 for previous project. 32 Includes $188,647 for previous project. SExcludes $894,475 major rehabilitation for Long Beach Dike. :4 Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed Funds. ; Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. � Includes $21,000 for previous projects. SIncludes $135,143 for previous project. :; Includes $10,000 for previous project. y Includes $162,517 for previous project. SIncludes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. 42 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 4 Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000 (Town R.). 44 Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River and $12,577 (Weymouth Town River). 45 Includes $59,420 for previous project. 46 Includes $35,214 from previous project. 47 Excludes $141,530 expended Contributed Funds. Other. 48 Excludes $829,000 Contributed Funds "Other" expended. 49 Includes $378,450 for previous project. so Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. s' Includes $81,410 for previous project. 52 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. 53 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 54 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 5 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 5�6 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 57 Includes $22,000 for previous projects. 5 Includes $42,340 for previous project. 59 Includes $3,160 for previous project. 1-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1986 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT' 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA' 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI7 1984 405,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT' 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT' 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT' 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH' 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT' 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 1986 50,000 - Middle Beach, CT' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI3 1963 14,512 29,024 Nantasket Beach, MA4 1971 - - North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA' 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI' 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA' 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT' 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA' 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, CT' 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT' 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT' --- - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT' 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA8 1961 - - Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH' 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA' 1971 180,944 200,208 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME 1983 171,000 - Winthrop Beach, MA' 1960 176,5676 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, CT' 1961 53,838 111,6792 S Completed. 2 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 3 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 4 Project inactive. 5 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic Riv 6 Project is complete. There are three additional groins, construction of which is deferred until it is determined that they are necessary. 7 Completed except for inactive portion. S Project inactive; Federal costs of $1,500.00 were incurred for preauthorization survey. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alley Bay, Beals, ME 3,4,1 0� Alford, Green River, MA 3,4 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA 3,4 Ansonia-Derby, CT 3 Bagaduce River, ME3,4,'o Bound Brook, Scituate, MA 3,4 Canton, MA 3,4 Charles River Dam, MA 3 Charlestown, NH 3,4 Cherryfield, ME 3,4 Chicopee, MA 3 Chicopee Falls, MA 3 Cocheco River, NH 3,4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3,4 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3,4 Danbury, CT3 Derby, CT3 East Branch Dam, CT 3 East Hartford, CT 3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT3,4 Fort Kent, ME 3,4 Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA3,4 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT 3 Hartford, CT3 Hartford, White River, VT3,4 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3,4 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3,4, '� Holyoke, MA 3 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 3,4 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3,4,'0 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3,4,1� Huntington, MA 3,4'�, Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 3,4 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3,4'�, Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3,4,' � Keene, NH3,4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH3,4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA:3,4', Lincoln School Lake, ME Little River Dike, Westfield, MA 3 Lowell, MA 3 Lower Woonsocket, RI3 Mad River Lake, CT3 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3 , ' Monoosnoc Brook, MA ' 3 Monoosnoc Lake, MA '" Nashua, NH3 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3,4,1' Nookagee Lake, MA Northampton, MA:3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT3,4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA 3 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3,4,'0 Norwalk, CT3,4 Norwich, CT3 Pawcatuck, CT:3 Phillips Lake, MA Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME:34.'" Riverdale, MA3 Salmon River, Colchester, CT3 4 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME Saxonville, MA3 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME:I,4 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH'" Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA:3,4 Springdale. MA3 1979 1977 1978 1977 1985 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1963 1982 1976 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1970 1960 1973 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1982 1976 1984 1945 1977 1973 1980 1967 1967 1950 1985 1976 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1966 1982 1980 1952 1983 1984 1981 1985 1977 1978 1952 $ 190,500 41,419 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 47,300 180,6705 41,170,921 113,330 203,000 1,433,6007 2,183,912 183,100 180,000 54,703 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 2,572,357 6,094,1009 332,236 2,235,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 551,606 37,852 13,155,29826 5,000 490,600" 6,600,681 4,773,020 107,681 270,0008 222,500 563,677 680,000' 7 73,865 3,235,00023 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 644,311 300,000 73,674 1,138,000 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,739 700,000 1-43 $- - 21 92,891 5,554,087'1s 385 411,29222 - 2 19 7,637 4 3,679,500' 4 15,500 2,781,100 24,447 - 25 1,266,63820 327 214,106 25,00 24 TABLE 1-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Springfield, MA 3 1950 577,00018 5,350 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT34 1983 116,296 - Stony Brook, Wilton, NH3, 4 1973 19,500 - Sucker Brook Dam, CT3 1976 2,227,712 58,800 Three Rivers, MA 3 1970 1,577,18912- Torrington, East Branch, CT 34 1963 389,200 - Torrington, West Branch, CT3,4 1963 228,300 - Trumbull Lake, CT' 1983 1,498,799 - Village of Saxtons, VT3,4,1 1985 140,500 - Ware, MA3 4 1963 400,000 - Waterbury-Watertown, CT34 1963 263,300 - Westerly, RI 1966 - - Weston, VT34 1957 13,000 1,800 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA 3 ,4 1983 116,492 - West Springfield, MA3 1954 1,334,00016- West Warren, MA34 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 605,023 - Winsted, CT 3 1954 245,500 - Woonsocket, RI3 1962 4,040,000 224, 500 Worcester Diversion, MA 3 1978 5,086,859 79,300 I Inactive. 15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, 16 Excludes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. Other. 17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Completed. 18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 19 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 5 Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 6 Completed except for inactive portion. 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 7 Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 22 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 8 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. Emergency funds expended. 23 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds 9 Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. expended on Fitchburg, MA. 1o Emergency Bank Protection. 24 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. " Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 25 Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 12 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 26 Dickey Lake portion deauthorized; costs shown reflect 13 To be restudied. combined Dickey-Lincoln School effort. '4 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME' 1935 6,384,394 -- I Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir - Aug 1977 $ - $ - Andover Lake, CT - Aug 1977 -- Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000- Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979- Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 - - Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977- - Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977- - Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800- Connecticut River below Hartford 1979 Oct 1978 - - CT (uncompleted portion) Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541- Dickey Lake, ME 1983 Dec 1981 13,130,000' - Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct. 1978 - - Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000- Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986- Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700- Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979- - Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979- Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 -- Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 -- Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200- Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 -- Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 -- Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978- - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000- South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 July 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT 1972 Nov 1979 (uncompleted portion) Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 1 For Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes Project. 1-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-H Study Identification NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Costs Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME Bass River, MA Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA Green Harbor, Marshfield, MA Harraseeket Inner Harbor, MA Nantucket Inner Harbor - Polpis, MA North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT Patten Bay, ME Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, ME Pines River, Revere, MA Point Judith Pond, RI Rockport and Old Harbors, MA Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA Scituate Harbor, MA Stonington Harbor, CT Weymouth Back River, Weymouth, MA Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME TABLE 1-I Study Identification BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Costs Belfast City Park, Belfast, ME City Point Beach, South Boston, MA Conimicut Beach, Warwick, RI Constitution Beach, East Boston, MA Cornhill Beach, Truro, MA Kennebunk Beach, Kennebunk, ME Pleasure Bay Beach, South Boston, MA Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT Sea Gull Beach, Yarmouth, MA Seaview and Parkers Rivers, MA South End Beach, Rockland, MA Tenean Beach, Dorchester, MA Town Beaches, CT Wollaston Beach, Quincy, MA West Haven Beaches, CT Woodmont Beach, CT $17,340 43,870 28,169 26,375 7,500 56,976 15,829 7,500 14,971 27,478 4,431 52,363 47,420 40,734 21,736 16,445 260 29,362 29,717 $ 160 6,500 54,465 2,600 192 39,357 2,700 55,590 18,647 298 10,300 6,500 14,243 2,700 17,401 61,088 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME Baker Brook, Fitchburg, MA Blackstone River, Cumberland, RI Blind Brook, Danbury, CT Connecticut River, Lebanon, NH Freshwater Brook, Enfield, CT Hobarts Pond, Whitman, MA Industrial Area, Waterbury, CT Mad River, Waterbury, CT Pawtuxet River, West Warwick, RI Point of Pines, Revere, MA Quinnipiac River, Wallingford, CT Rippawam River, Stamford, CT Riverdale, MA Saugus River, Reedy Meadows, Lynnfield, MA Souhegan River, Milford, NH Tankerhoosen River, Vernon, CT Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT Wepawaug River, Milford, CT West River, New Haven, CT Winnipesaukee River, NH TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 28 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester, MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,902 $940,000 $2,306,902 I Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-47 Fiscal Year Costs $146,517 24,065 2,454 2,000 7,500 3,800 7,500 28,441 63,077 49,316 69,405 43,424 33,824 7,125 6,500 5,000 6,500 18,457 16,811 79,088 133,406 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages1 Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,0002 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,0003 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, RI 13 Flood wall, conduits and channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 250,000 - 250,000 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 180,000 - 180,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 3,300,000 - 3,300,000 1 Includes relocations. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-L CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 29 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Conne- Reservoir Lands cticut Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages1 Total Vermont: Union Village2 White River 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 Junction North Hartland 2 White River 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 Junction North Springfield 2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 I 6,831,526 Ball Mountain2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,689,298 350,000 11,039,298 earth Townsend 2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook 2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville 2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville 2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,0004 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,712 180,0003 2,407,712 1 Tnl,id hiohwav railrnad and utility rplocatinns 3 Nnn-Fpdprnl en.t 2 or d a l s, ,.se e. r, t .iv 2 For details, see individual report. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1 4IQ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Conne- Lands cticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection $ 113,330 - $ 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,447 271,000 2,406,447 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 495,691 35,000 530,691 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,000 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,100 - 44,100 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,0005 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT2 51 Conduit 60,164,740 1,300,000 61,464,740 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,138,000 50,000 1,188,000 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,0006 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,579,0003 30,000 1,609,000 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 389,200 64,000 453,200 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests " Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. portion of relocation. 5 Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 2 For details see individual report. 6 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 30 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRSi Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Nagua- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow 4 Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,0003 $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch' Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,0003 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Rock Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. 4 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 5 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. 1-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 1-M (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS' Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages2 Total Alford, Green River, MA 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $ 41,419 $ - $ 41,419 protection Ansonia-Derby, CT 13.0 Wall, levee, chainnel 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 improvement and pumping station Danbury, CT 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,143,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 and bridge replacement Derby, CT 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 station North Canaan, Blackberry 83.0 Snagging and clearing 73,865 - 73,865 River, CT project Pittsfield, MA 133.0 Stone arch culvert 739,003 85,000 824,003 Salisbury, CT 76.0 Gabionade with slope 102,800 - 102,800 protection Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 202,608 - 202,608 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber Bulkhead 116,296 - 116,296 Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT 51.0 Dike and channel 389,200 - 389,200 improvement Torrington, West Branch, CT 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 - 228,300 Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 S For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 34 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Franklin Falls 2 Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater 2 Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton-Everett 2 ,4 Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell 2 Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Monoosnoc3 Leominster, MA 100.6 71 Earthfill 2,000 3,430,000 370,000 3,800,0006 Phillips2 Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,0006 Nookagee Fitchburg, MA 107.9 106 Earthfill 8,100 15,476,000 5,742,000 21,200,000 Whitmanville Fitchburg, MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 4 Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and 2 For details, see individual report. height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton 3 Project deferred, cost not revised on current price basis. Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. 5 Includes Non-Federal reimbursement. 6Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and reventment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA 2 Nashua, NH 2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,0004 Lowell, MA2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,6005 90,000 580,600 Monoosnoc Brook, MA:; 98.4 Channel improvement 310,000 90,000 400,000 North Nashua River, MA2,6 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 ' To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. 3 Project deferred. Cost has not been revised on current price basis. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 1-51 TABLE 1-O REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 42 of Text) RESERVOIRS.. Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity and Name Nearest River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hodges Village2 Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield 2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville 2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,221 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow2 Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 SIncludes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 SBorne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1986 Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $9,096,164 $30,978,015 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $9,096,1641 $32,944,124 1 Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted Massachusetts Bridgeport Harbor Clinton Harbor Connecticut River below Hartford Duck Island Milford Harbor Narraguagus River New London Harbor Jan 1986 Jul 1986 Jun 1986 Feb 1986 May 1986 Nov 1985 Apr 1986 Maine Andrews River Annisquam River Beverly Harbor Boston Harbor Cape Cod Canal Chatham (Stage) Harbor Cuttyhunk Harbor Gloucester Harbor Green Harbor Newburyport Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor Wareham Harbor Weymouth Fore & Town River New Hampshire Belfast Harbor Harraseeket River Isle Au Haut Rockport Harbor Saco River Stonington Harbor Union River York Harbor Apr 1986 Jul 1986 Jun 1986 Oct 1985 Feb 1986 Nov 1985 May 1986 May 1986 Hampton Harbor Rhode Island Block Island, Harbor of Refuge Great Salt Pond Point Judith Harbor New York Hay (West) Harbor Jun 1986 1-53 Connecticut Jul 1986 Oct 1985 Jun 1986 Jun 1986 Feb 1986 Feb 1986 May 1986 May 1986 Jul 1986 Apr 1986 Dec. 1985 Feb 1986 Jul 1986 Jun 1986 Nov 1985 Nov 1985 Nov 1985 Feb 1986 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT * This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State line to, but not including Manasquan I nlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Aquatic Plant Control.........................................2-2 2. Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels. N.Y...................2-2 3. Bronx River, N.Y...............................................2-2 4. Browns Creek, N.Y.............................................2-3 5. Buttermilk Channel, N.Y....................................2-3 6. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y...................................2-4 7. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y.............................2-4 8. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y.........................................2-5 9. Hudson River, N.Y............................................2-5 10. Jones Inlet, N.Y.................................................2-6 11. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y..............2-7 12. Long Island Intra Coastal W/W, N.Y...................2-7 13. Moriches Inlet, N.Y.............................................2-7 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y........................2-8 15. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J ............................................... 2-8 16. Newtown Creek, N.Y..........................................2-9 17. New York and New Jersey Channels....................2-10 18. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of drift........................................2-11 19. New York Harbor-entrance channels & 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. Anchorage areas.........................................2-11 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y.....................................2-12 Raritan River, N.J.............................................2-12 Rondout Harbor, N.Y.........................................2-13 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y.......................................2-14 Shrewsbury River, N.J........................................2-14 Westchester Creek, N.Y......................................2-15 Supervisor of New York Harbor.............................2-16 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...............2-14 Other authorized navigation projects.....................2-17 Navigation work under special authorization.........2-17 Beach Erosion Control 30. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I)...........................2-17 31. Sea Bright to Ocean Township, NJ ..................... 2-17 32. Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects......2-17 33. Beach erosion control work under special authorization...................................2-18 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. Ardsley, N.Y.............. ................................... 2-18 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J............2-18 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I............2-18 Sawmill River Elmsford-Greenburgh, N.Y...........2-19 Inspection of completed flood control projects..........2-20 Other authorized flood control projects...................2-20 Dam Safety Program..........................................2-20 Flood control work under special authorization.......2-20 Emergency streambank and shoreline protection under special authorization...........2-21 General Investigations 43. 44. 45. Surveys..............................................................2-21 Collection and study of basic data.........................2-21 Deauthorized projects..........................................2-21 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement.....................2-22 Table 2-B Authorizing Legislation...........................2-27 Table 2-C Hudson River, N.Y. Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project.....2-32 Table 2-D Total Costs for Existing Project ................. 2-32 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities...........................2-32 Table 2-F Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.....2-33 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects.........2-34 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects...............................................2-36 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects......2-37 Table 2-J Surveys..................................................2-38 Table 2-L Costs for Flood Plain Management Services 2-38 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects .............................. 2-38 Table 2-N Section 17 Continue Detailed Project Report.2-39 Table 2-0 Section 13 Complete Preauthorization Reconnaissance Report.........................2-40 Table 2-P Section 25 Continue Preauthorization Reconnaissance Report.........................2-40 Table 2-Q Section 14 Complete Reconnaissance Reports................................................2-41 Navigation Page Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. Operations and results during period. FY1986 has been the fifth year of a ten year control program, started in FY 1982, for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain. This work was performed for the removal of water chestnut in the South Bay and Eurasian milfoil in St. Albans Bay at a cost of $277,000. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division area was completed in August 1967. Planning for the water chestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $181,562 accomplished during FY 1971 through FY 1976. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,095,700. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along east shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor and, with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327 and 12334). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1768 and 195, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 1,200 feet wide and 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook channels, thence 1,200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street, Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277,197, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $2,746,622.00 for the removal of approximately 823,000 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock, lying above the plane of 40 feet below mean low water in specified sections of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. with satisfactory disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on September 8, 1986. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $48,776 was expended on engineering and design and surveys. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. Location. Empties into a shallow bay in north shore of East River, 11 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12339.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, page 1762, and Annual Report for 1938, page 166. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide to extend from deep water in East River to the head of navigation at the dam at East 177th Street, involving the first dredging from East River at Randall Avenue to a width of 200 feet; thence to Spofford Avenue, 150 feet; thence to Watson Avenue, 125 feet; thence to railroad bridge near Westchester Avenue, 100 feet, except in southern approach to bridge, where it is to be 140 feet. Section included in project is about 2.4 miles long. Mean tidal range is 6.9 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of project as described above cost $1,080,910, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects, and exclusive of $10,000 contributed by local interests. Channel widening from Westchester Avenue to East 172d Street is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. For latest published map, see Annual 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Report for 1912, page 1470. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1913, provides that any right-of-way that may be necessary for the execution of the project shall be furnished free of cost to the United States. Right-ofway within bulkhead lines below Westchester Avenue Bridge was accepted by Chief of Engineers June 1920, and above the Westchester Avenue Bridge October 28. On September 10, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved releases from damages furnished by adjoining property owners between Westchester Avenue and East 174th Street. On November 12, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved an agreement under which City of New York would reimburse the United States for cost of a retaining wall to protect adjoining property in reach of river between Westchester Avenue and New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad bridge in lieu of furnishing additional right-of-way. On October 28, 1940, the Secretary of War authorized the acceptance of $10,000 from the city of New York to defray the cost of retaining wall. Additional right-of-way required in the section below East 172d Street has not been furnished. City of New York indicated it does not feel justified in acquiring any additional land along the river. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A lump sum contract in the amount of $671,313.00 for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 10 and 12 feet below mean low water in specified sections of Bronx River, N.Y. with satisfactory disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean, was awarded on 24 April 1986, to Weeks Dredging Company. The dredging work commenced on 5 August 1986 and was still in progress as of 30 September 1986. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $826,094 as of 30 September 1986 was expended for maintenance dredging accomplished during FY 1986. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Active portion of existing project was commenced in 1914 and completed in 1941. Work remaining under existing project consists of widening reach between Westchester Avenue Bridge and East 172d Street. Channel between 172d Street and the upper limit of authorized project was filled in by City of New York under a Department of the Army permit and is no longer a waterway. 4. BROWNS CREEK. N.Y. Location. A narrow, crooked tidal stream emptying into Great South Bay, near Sayville, Long Island, N.Y., about 15 miles by water northeast of Fire Island Inlet, and about 65 miles by water east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from 6-foot contour in Great South Bay for 1,850 feet, and thence, with same width, 4 feet deep for 1,350 feet; also for two stone jetties to protect the entrance, east jetty to be 448 feet long and west jetty 700 feet long. Section included in project is about 0.6 mile. Mean tidal range, 0.6 feet; mean range of spring tides 0.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water up to 3.2 feet above mean high water. Cost of new work for completed portion of project is $33,976. Dredging of channel to a depth of 4 feet for 3,300 feet northward to upper limit of project and extension of jetties; east jetty to 1,400 feet long and west jetty 1,600 feet long were deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminals, including several ferries, with a total available dockage of 7,980 feet, are scattered along shore of creek between its mouth and head of improved channel. Three are publicly owned; all are open to the public. None has rail connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract in the amount of $117,132.40 for the removal of approximately 20,392 cubic yards of material, lying above the planes of 6 feet and 4 feet below mean low water with disposal of the dredged material on a confined upland disposal site was awarded to Gibson & Cushman Dredging Corporation on 26 September 1986. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $18,412 was expended on engineering design and surveys. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1891 and completed July 1927. East jetty was completed to a length of 448 feet in 1893. West jetty was completed to a length of 492 feet in 1892 and extended in 1927 to a total length of 700 feet. Six-foot channel has been completed. Four-foot channel has been completed for 1,350 feet. 5. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. Location. Connects deep water in Upper Bay, New York Harbor, southwest of Governors Island, with deep water in East River northeast of Governors Island, and, with Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, forms an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from Narrows to East River. Ut lies between Governors Island and Borough of Brooklyn, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12334 and 12335.) Previous projects. For details see page 205, Annual Report for 1932. 2-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. A channel 1,000 feet wide, 40 feet deep at mean low water for width of existing 500-foot channel and 35 feet deep for remaining 500-foot width of existing channel. Suitable widening at junctions with East River and Anchorage Channel to 35 feet deep and with Red Hook Channel to 40 feet deep and for additional widening with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels to provide maximum clear channel width of 2,100 feet to 35 feet deep. Section included in project is 2.25 miles long. Mean tidal range 4.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 feet, irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed projected cost $4,093,951, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount $30,000 was expended on engineering and design for future maintenance dredging of this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project commenced October 1903 and was completed March 1965. Easterly 500-foot width of channel, from Anchorage Channel to East River, was completed to a 40-foot depth in May 1935. Westerly 500-foot channel, including widening the junction with East River, was completed to a 35-foot depth in July 1961. Widening the junctions with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels was completed in March 1965. 6. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanical-handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 14 feet below mean low water in the Inlet was awarded on June 28, 1985. Work commenced on September 19, 1985 and was continuing as of 30 September 1985. Fiscal Year operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,042,116 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection and for contract payment for this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long, was completed in July 1834. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 7. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel generally parallel to the jetty 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from a littoral reservoir (sediment trap) in the ocean to deep water in the inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 ft. and 2.4 ft. respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements & rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. None within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvements. Operations and results during the period. At the request of local interests, maintenance dredging was postponed in 1979 until the completion of an Inlet Dynamic Study. The residents of Oak Beach contend that dredging the Inlet exposes Oak Beach to direct wave attack thereby causing an erosion problem. The Inlet Dynamic Study was completed in 1985; and other subsequent, related studies have not proven the contention that the erosion at Oak Beach is related to the construction of the project channel. The resumption of the project is still being studied. 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced in late 1973. As a result of three consecutive dredging operations completed in 1977, the project channel was brought to the approximate authorized dimension at that time. No maintenance dredging was accomplished in the ensuing time period. Due to the aforementioned local concerns maintenance has been deferred since 1979 which has allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized channel. 8. GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. Location. A narrow tidal inlet extending eastwardly about 1 mile from east side of Hempstead Harbor on the north shore of Long Island, 26 miles northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12366.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at mean low water from deep water in Hempstead Harbor about 1 mile to the head of navigation at city of Glen Cove. Mean tidal range, 7.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $29,760, exclusive of $29,774 expended from contributed funds. Widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel were it crosses the beach are considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Existing project adopted by 1925 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong., 1st sess.). Latest published map is in project document.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925, provides that local interests pay one-half of first cost of the work, provided rights-of-way, spoildisposal areas, and bulkheads, and give assurances that adequate terminals will be built. Complied with as to contribution of one-half of first cost of work done to date, ceding of rights-of-way, provision of disposal areas, and the construction of terminals. Pending construction of bulkheads by local interests along southerly side of channel in the upper 1,600 feet of the improvement, a channel of less than project width has been excavated. In letter dated February 4, 1948, the Commissioner, Department of Public Works, City of Glen Cove, was notified of the conditions affecting the remaining work. There is no indication as to when compliance with these conditions may be expected. Terminal facilities. There are 1,875 feet of bulkheads along northerly side of waterway. Terminals are adequate for present needs and there is ample waterfront, both public and private, for additional terminals as needs arise. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $29,925 was expended on reconnaissance surveys, and engineering and design in conjunction with future maintenance dredging of this project. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 55 percent complete. Work under the active portion of existing project was commenced August 1933 and completed August 1934. The work done provided a channel 100 feet wide from deep water in Hempstead Harbor for 3,470 feet, thence gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide for 180 feet, and 50 feet wide for about 1,450 feet to the head of the improvement. Head of navigation is at City of Glen Cove, about 1 mile above the mouth. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel and building a sand fence along north side of channel where it crosses the beach. 9. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335,12341,12343,12347,12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1764 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of the Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. Mean range of pool elevation above Federal dam at Troy, in seasons of moderate rains, is about 2.2 feet, as determined in 1934. Mean tidal range is about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.1 feet between July and September at Albany, extreme range due to freshets is 33.1 and 25.9 feet, respectively normal pool level above Federal dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.33 feet above mean sea level. In tidal section of river below dam, assumed lowest low water plane from Troy to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and 2-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6. Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $96,500 was awarded on August 14, 1985 for shoreline protection at the Albany Turning Basin, Hudson River, Rensselaer, New York. Of the contract amount, $80,000 was Federal fund, while the remaining $16,500 were contributed funds for the reconstruction of a storm sewer outfall through the riprap. Work was completed on the project on October 28, 1985. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $158,461 were expended on engineering and design and preparation of maintenance dredging specifications for the North Germantown, Stuyvesant and Castleton reaches of the Hudson River. A contract for removal of approximately 497,500 cubic yards of material was awarded on August 18, 1986 to North American Trailing Company. A total of $399,938 of an estimated contract amount of $2,538,750 was expended on the contract by September 30, 1986. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $223,594 for maintenance in FY 1986. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing dredging and project condition surveys at a cost of $235,786 for maintenance in FY 1986. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently through the fiscal year on repairs to Cedar Hill Dike at a cost of $27,083 for maintenance in FY 1986. Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout the fiscal year with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam including the associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1985 navigation season on December 9, 1985 and was resumed for the 1986 navigation season on April 26, 1986. Total cost incurred for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the associated buildings and grounds was $697,386 for FY 1986. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. 10. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and numerous boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $137,883 was expended on reconnaissance surveys of the navigation channel and also studies to evaluate the rehabilitation requirements of the federal jetty. NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION ($34,500). The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS ($49,264). The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternative which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/inlet hydraulics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc., have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. 11. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $198,000,000 with an additional $142,000,000 to be contributed by local interests (Oct 86 P.L.). Local operation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has indicated that it intends to fulfill the legal requirements for non-Federal interests existing at the time of Congressional authorization. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. No construction work has been started. Preparation of a General Design Memo is in process on an accelerated basis. A draft supplement EIS including the 404 evaluation has been completed. 12. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the south end of Shinnecock Canal. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal. Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock Bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are 17 boat repair and storage yards within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future commerce warrants. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded to Gibson & Cushman Dredging Corporation on 4 April 1986 for the removal of all material lying above the planes of 6 & 8 feet below mean low water in specific sections within the Shinnecock Bay reach and 10 feet below mean water in the Moriches Bay reach of Long Island Intracoastal waterway, New York. The material was disposed on nearby beaches. The work commenced on 13 May 1986 and was completed on 20 June 1986. A total of 106,155 cubic yards, place measurement, of material was removed at a cost of $702,448. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $971,988 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection and for contract payments for this project. Condition as of September 30. Original work under the existing project was commenced Oct 1939 and commenced Sept 1940. 13. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.7 mile; thence a channel 5 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost 2-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 of work is $10,300,000 (October 1986 P.L.) including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $3,700,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all easements, rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for improvements at an overall 35% cost sharing basis. The annual Operations and Maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,860,000, of which the local share is 50% or $930,000 per year. An Agreement of Local Cooperation was executed on 30 June 1986. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, numerous public and private terminals facilities are available in Moriches Bay and in the connecting canals. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharfs and landings,, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for servicing boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e. navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). Formulated plans for single purpose navigation project. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated. Preconstruction planning (advance engineering and design) has been completed and contract plans and specifications were completed in January 1985. 14. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. & V.T. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 14784.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y., at head of Lake Champlain, to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 20 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In Whitehall Harbor consisting of three timber wharves, aggregating 4,200 feet in length. State of New York constructed a barge canal terminal at Whitehall, just south of terminus of canal, which has been equipped with a 5- ton hand-operated derrick and a storehouse. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $19,418. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $17,789. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $45,723 were expended on engineering and design for future maintenance of this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least a width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow (Putts Leap and Putts Rock). (Fender booms opposite the Delaware and Hudson Railroad trestle have been removed as they are no longer considered necessary for navigation.) The work remaining to complete the project consists of widening the channel throughout its entire length to the project width of 200 feet. 15. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, N.Y. and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80 miles 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT into Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333 and 12337.) Previous projects. For details see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929,1938,1954, and 1976, pages 301,244,134, and 2-11 respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wideto the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening of bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted above.) (adopted 1966.) At Port Newark - A branch channel 800 feet wide leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, length 4,100 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). At Elizabeth Marine Terminal - A branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 1.1 miles; a south channel along the south bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet; a southern approach area just above former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 800 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-ofway, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cable and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully compiled with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A lump sum contract was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge & Rock Company on 16 January 1986 for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 30 feet and 25 feet below mean low water from the specified sections of the Hackensack River with disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean. Work commenced on 27 February 1986 and was completed on March 14 1986. Contractor's total earnings was $838,633. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $957,000 was expended on engineering and design, contract supervision and inspection and contract payments on this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of; deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. Work was initiated for modification of project consisting of additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 37 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island. Two contacts for the removal of all material including ledge rock to 37 feet mean low water were completed at a total cost of $4,402,631. 16. NEWTOWN CREEK, N.Y. Location. A tidal waterway entering East River, N.Y., and 4.5 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City, and forms a part of boundary between boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12335). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1769 and 207, respectively. Existing project. A channel 23 feet deep and 130 feet wide from East River to a point 150 feet north of Maspeth Avenue; a turning basin at former location of Mussel Island and a triangular area lying on north side of entrance to creek of same depth; a channel 20 feet deep, 75 to 100 feet wide in Dutch Kills, 2,800 feet long; a channel in Maspeth Creek of same depth and 100 feet wide, for 2,000 feet; a channel in East Branch, 18 feet deep and 150 feet north of Maspeth Avenue to Grand Street Bridge and thence 125 feet wide, to Metropolitan Avenue Bridge; a channel in English Kills or West Branch, 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Metropolitan Avenue Bridge, including easing of bends. Section included in project is about 5.2 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.2 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water up to 4.2 feet above mean high water. New work for active portion of project consisting of channels described above, cost $767,093, exclusive of amounts expended on 2-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 previous projects. Deepening English Kills to 20 feet to Metropolitan Avenue Bridge and thence 12 feet deep, and 100 feet wide from Metropolitan Avenue Bridge to within 80 feet of Montrose Avenue Bridge, suitably widened by excavating upland at second bend above Metropolitan Avenue Bridge, and deepening East Branch to 20 feet are inactive and are excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. See page 160, 1964 Annual Report for requirements under acts of March 1919 and August 26, 1937. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 190-208. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $50,950 was expended on engineering and design surveys and environmental studies for future maintenance dredging of this project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under entire existing project is about 64 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced May 1921 and completed December 1932. Enlarging main channel to 23-foot depth and 130- foot width from entrance to 150 feet north of Maspeth Avenue, including triangular area at entrance, and a turning basic at former location of Mussel Island, is about 90 percent complete. Dutch Kills has been dredged to project depth, 20 feet, for a width of 75 to 100 feet except at a few places near head of improvement where unstable bulkheads restricted dredging operations. Maspeth Creek dredged to project dimensions throughout. Work remaining consists of completing to project dimensions 23-foot main channel between Greenpoint and Meeker Avenue, and between 800 and 150 feet north of Maspeth Avenue; 20 foot channel in East Branch; and 20- and 12-foot channels in English Kills. 17. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York bay and Raritan bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between states of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327.( Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide from a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 20B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers' dredge "McFarland" was employed from 22 May 1986 to 5 June 1986 to restore project dimensions in Seguine Point vicinity. Removed 54,460 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $292,004. Hopper dredge was also employed from 5 June 1986 to 7 July 1986 to restore project dimensions in Raritan Bay reach (east channel). Removed 226,532 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $903,863. Conditions as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sand Hook. (See Table 2-D for total cost for existing project to September 30, 1982.) 18. NEW YORK HARBOR - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost of improvement under Act of 1974 is $125,400,000 (October 86 P.L.), including $23,200,000 cash contribution from local interests, plus $55,900,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during period. New work: Liberty State Park Contract IVB was completed at a cost of $1,268,000. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of Piers 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,609. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,700. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,820,000. A contract for the City of Bayonne was completed at a cost of $2,160,100. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at a cost of $965,300. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,598,500. A continuing contract was awarded for Brooklyn Reach One at an estimated cost of $4,164,600. Engineering and design for the balance of the project is continuing. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 645,942 cubic feet (5,046 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $3,270,340 in FY 1986. Conditions as of September 30. Work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1915, 1917, and 1930 is continuous maintenance for which no percentage of completion exists. For work authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weehawken, and Edgewater. In New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River inclusive of Piers 17 and 18, Stapleton, Staten Island. Removal work is currently underway at Brooklyn. 19. NEW YORK HARBOR - ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 165 miles northwest of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327,12334,12335, and 12349). Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 3.7 miles from junction with new southerly entrance to junction 2-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 with Main Ship Channel; Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in Anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company on 21 April 1986 for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 40 feet below mean low water from the Red Hook Flats Anchorage area of New York Harbor, with disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean. Work commenced on 22 April 1986 and was completed on 14 May 1986. Removed 209,672 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $943,524. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $181,244 were expended on engineering and design, and contract supervision and inspection, for this project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' dredge "McFarland" was employed from 11 April 1986 to 20 May 1986 to restore authorized dimensions in Main Ship Channel. A total of 274,026 cubic yards, place measurement, of material was removed at a cost of $937,169. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600- foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, 50, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section) was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay Anchorage was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 20. PLATTSBURGH HARBOR, N.Y. Location. An area of about 25 acres along the westerly shore of Cumberland Bay, an arm of Lake Champlain. The harbor is that portion of the bay between the wharf front of the city of Plattsburg, N.Y., and the breakwater constructed by the United States. (See Lake Surveys Chart 172.) Existing projects. Provides for a breakwater 1,565 feet long, built of timber cribs filled with rubblestone and capped with large stone and extending from a point 750 feet south of outer face of South dock generally northeasterly to a point about 1,400 feet from shore; and for dredging to a depth of 9 feet at low lake level between the breakwater and the wharves. Reference plane of low lake level is 93.0 feet above mean sea level at Sandy Hook, N.J. Usual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet, and extreme variation from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. New work for completed project cost $198,415. Terminal facilities. Four timber wharves, aggregating 1,780 feet in length, 400 feet of which are open to the public; all are privately owned. The State of New York has constructed a barge canal terminal about 1 mile north of the breakwater. These appear adequate for the existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $58,000 was expended on engineering and design for repair of the breakwater. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Work under existing project commenced 1836 and was completed in 1913. Breakwater was completed in 1893 and dredging in 1913. 21. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in north-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Basin, between Perth Amboy and South 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12332.) Previous projects. For Details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1777, 359, and 259 respectively. Existing projects. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal; thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and including $66,000 contributed by local interests. Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoildisposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, required for maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No.5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 274-279 and 281. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $22,004 was expended on reconnaissance surveys and engineering and design for future maintenance dredging of this project. Conditions as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels to and including a turning basin of same depth opposite Government wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouth of Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Delaware and Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 12,400 feet to within 1,300 feet of junction with Main Channel to Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 22. RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Comprises tidal mouth about 3.5 miles long, of Rondout Creek, whose source is about 18 miles west of Rondout. Creek empties into Hudson River from the west, about 89 miles north of the Battery, New York City, and 55 miles south of Albany. Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide, widening at bends, and 14 feet deep from deep water in Hudson River to highway bridge, 1.3 miles above mouth, thence 12 feet deep to 3.5 miles above mouth, two parallel dikes 350 feet apart to maintain channel, and a branch dike to extend upstream from outer end of north dike to protect that dike from running ice in Hudson River. Mean tidal range, 3.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 4.2 feet; extreme range, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to freshets vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 2.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $131,140. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1965 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the Federal project as modified and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore or the costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain depths in berthing areas serving terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. Assurances of local compliance were furnished by 2-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 town of Ulster on June 9, by city of Kingston on June 17, and by town of Esopus on June 20, 1966. Terminal facilities. Seventeen timber wharves with available dockage of 12,132 feet along waterway. Four terminals are equipped with transfer facilities; all are privately owned. Terminals adequate for present needs of commerce. (For latest full description see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports on Upper Hudson River, 1941, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $58,000 was expended on surveys and engineering and design for rehabilitation of dikes at Rondout Harbor, N.Y. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project was commenced April 1873 and is about 87 percent complete. Part of diking originally proposed was not built because it was deemed of doubtful usefulness. Two parallel dikes of an aggregate length of about 5,000 feet, generally 350 feet apart, with a now obsolete spur from the old lighthouse south of south dike, were built across the bar at mouth of creek. A branch dike about 1,000 feet long, extending northerly from outer end of north dike, was also constructed. Work remaining consists of removal of shoals in extension of 12 foot channel from mile 1.8 to 3.5. 23. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is $18,700,000 (Oct 86 P.L.) including $130,000 from the Coast Guard and $7,060,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-3 for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The share of local cooperation is 38 percent of the initial cost and 47 percent of maintenance, operating and replacement costs (based on the cost sharing provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986). The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation expressed their intent to provide required items of local cooperation by letter dated 8 September 1986. Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. It is part of the Long Island resort region, which affords recreation to thousands of people participating in fishing, pleasure boating, and bathing. Many hotels and tourists homes are located in the area, as well as yacht clubs, boatyards, public wharves and landing, and numerous private landings. Safe access to the ocean is necessary for commercial fishing and recreational craft. Operations and results during period. Work was done on preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement. Condition as of September 30. No Federal construction has been done. Preconstruction engineering and design is continuing. 24. SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. Location. Mainly a large tidal basin in eastern part of New Jersey, the outlet being at the southeast end of Sandy Hook. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12324.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports of 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1778, 373, and 267, respectively. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide, following the westerly shore, from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay 2.2 miles to a point 500 feet south of former location of railroad bridge at Highlands; then 9 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide, suitably widened at bends and turns, in south branch of river 6.8 miles to Branchport Avenue Bridge in city of Long Branch; and a channel in north branch (Navesink R.) 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide 6.1 miles from the junction to Red Bank. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide at Highlands, 3.8 feet; at Seabright, 1.7 feet; at Branchport, 1.7 feet; and at Red Bank, 3 feet. Mean range of spring tides is 4.7, 2.1, 2.2, and 3.6 feet respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT atmospheric pressure vary from 1.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.5 feet above mean high water. Dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank, 6 feet deep and about 19 acres in area; a channel in Claypit Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide about 1 mile from 6-foot curve in north branch to head of the creek; a channel in Oceanport Creek, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 2 miles long from channel in south branch to New York and Long Branch Railroad Bridge; and a channel in Little Silver Creek, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2.6 miles long from channel in south branch to Seven Bridge Road Bridge is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. Cost estimate for this portion (1960) is $578,000 exclusive of $86,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-ofway, and spoil-disposal areas for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain a suitable public wharf on each of the creeks to be improved, which shall be open to all on equal terms; remove Locust Avenue bridge over Claypit Creek; and make cash contributions of $25,000, $33,000, and $27,500 toward cost of improvement of Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks, respectively. Provided further that construction of any unit of proposed improvement may be undertaken independently of the other units when the required local cooperation has been provided. These conditions have not been fulfilled. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 33 terminals with a total berthage of 7,986 feet on the waterway. Eight terminals with a total berthage of 1,000 feet are open to the public. In addition, many private pleasure boat landings have been constructed by owners of riverfront estates. Fifteen boatyards with storage space for 670 craft and equipped with 21 marine railways are available. None of the terminals has direct rail connections. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Work commenced on 5 November 1985 and was completed on 16 April 1986. A total of 172,211 cubic yards of material, was removed at a total contract price of $1,235,850, of which $659,393 represented contributed funds from the State of New Jersey for the removal of 98,961 cubic yards of material from the state channel. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $660,526 was expended for this work. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of existing project began in October 1919. Work completed consisted of providing authorized project dimensions in 12-foot entrance channel, 9-foot channel in South Branch, and a 6- foot channel in North Branch of the river. Work remaining (dredging an inlet channel across the base of Sandy Hook protected by jetties and bulkheads, a bay channel extending to the existing Shrewsbury River Channel and a six-lane fixed highway bridge to span the new inlet as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965) was subsequently reclassified to inactive because of state and local opposition. Formal close out of this work remains. Under the River and Harbor Act of 1950 work remaining consists of dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank and channels in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. 25. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. A tidal stream flowing into East River from north at a point 14 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12336.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1921 and 1938, pages 238 and 164, respectively. Existing project. A 2.6 mile channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide for 2,000 feet through the estuary; thence 80 feet wide for 3,000 feet; and thence 60 feet wide 8,800 feet to head of navigation at East Tremont Avenue (Fort Schuyler Road), with widening at bends, and two turning basins, one near upper end of channel, the other near Eastern Boulevard (Unionport) Bridge. Mean tidal range, 7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of the project cost $98,751 exclusive of amounts expended on pervious projects. Dredging turning basin to a depth of 12 feet below mean low water, 250 by 1250 feet in extend, 500 feet downstream from head of navigation, is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides that local interests agree to furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance and furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance as required; hold the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain a suitable bulkhead or other works approved by Chief of Engineers for retaining the east bank of the turning basin alongside Hutchinson River Parkway; and that local interests give assurances they will construct a public wharf when required. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A lump sum contract in the amount of $719,217 for the removal of all material, except ledge rock, lying 2-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water with satisfactory disposal of dredged material at the EPA's approved Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on 24 April 1986 to Weeks Dredging Company. The dredging work commenced on 22 July 1986 and was ongoing as of 30 September 1986. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $932,244 were expended for maintenance dredging accomplished during FY 1986. Conditions as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project commenced March 1932 and was relocated by city of New York in 1941. Head of navigation is at East Tremont Avenue, Bronx, about 2.6 miles above the mouth. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging to 12 feet below mean low water a turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent to be 500 feet downstream from head of navigation. 26. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 307, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under jurisdiction of the New York District was accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the waterfront for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of the 3-mile limit of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol was limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with twoway radios patrolled shorefront facilities and property. These inspectors operate out of field offices located at Melville, New York and one inspector working at the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit applications. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 28. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 29. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) Beach Erosion Control 30. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PT.1) Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year G-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT supply of beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $25,400,000 (Oct. 1986 P.L.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $25,400,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $8,813,500 the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $16,586,500 for periodic nourishment, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 21, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period. Periodic Nourishment Contract No. 4 was completed in August 1986. Condition as of September 30. Advance engineering and design is completed. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August 1982. Contract for construction of stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September 1982. Contract for third periodic nourishment contract No. 4. is completed. The fifth nourishment contract is scheduled for summer 1988. This is the final nourishment contract in which Federal participation is authorized. 31. SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Sea Bright to Ocean Township by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water and by the construction of 23 new groins and the extension of 14 existing groins in the Sea Bright - Ocean Township section. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 10 years from the year that the total quantity of fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions in that section. Total estimated Federal cost is $91,000,000. Total estimated non-Federal for all requirements of local cooperation is $12,000,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Reconstruction of the sea wall at Sea Bright and Monmouth was funded by the State. In addition the State provided funds in the amount of $100,000 for a limited analysis by the New York District with a view to deferring certain construction elements. Operations and results during period, and Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated, but the project is in active status with work continuing on the preparation of General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 33. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 2-0 at the of chapter.) Flood Control 34. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal flood control project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 1,000 feet, and approximately 290 feet of concrete channel upstream of the new Ashford Avenue Bridge. Upstream of the concrete channel along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 425 feet of floodwall will be constructed running north of the Conrail Bridge. Ponding areas, drainage ditches 2-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $3,310,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,100,000 (October 1986 P.L.). Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in S.1567, local interests are required to furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for flood control improvements presently estimated at $610,000 and operate and maintain the project at an estimated cost of $29,000; interests pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to flood control for a total cost of $1,100,000 project cost but not less than that required by project authorization presently estimated at $1,100,000. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the local sponsor, in an 11 December 1973 letter, indicated its intent to comply with the items of local cooperation and reaffirmed this on 15 August 1979 and 23 August 1985. The State of New York, in a 18 October 1985 letter, expressed this willingness to assume responsibility as local sponsor in accordance with the Cost Sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the Administration and Senator Majority Leadership Compromise as reflected in WRDA 1986. Operation and results during period. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved in March 1979. Construction has not been initiated. 35. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and Statue of Liberty, in Upper New York Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a levee and sea wall, and pedestrian walkways; over environmentally sensitive areas. The construction of the levee project will allow the creation of a large Greenpark to include a wetlands preserve, an inland water course and boat basin, a marina, an amphitheater, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, picnic areas, historic areas, community facilities, restaurants, plaza, and many other areas for both active and passive recreational and aesthetic benefit to visitors. The stone armored levee will also serve as a settlement-free base for subsequent construction of a tree-lined promenade, the Liberty walk, curving along the water's edge. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $19,100,000; with an additional $19,100,000 contribution by local interests including lands, certain relocations, utilities, and interior drainage. Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all land, easements and rights-of-way including relocations, save those existing utilities passing through the proposed levee, necessary for the flood control improvements and to operate and maintain the project at an annual cost estimated to total $56,000. The State will assume all costs for construction of an interior drainage system to provide (10) year level of protection estimated to be $5,100,000. Local interests have agreed to voluntarily pay 50% of project cost. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is the local sponsor. The local cooperation agreement was executed on 26 June 1986. Operation and results during period and Conditions as of September 30. Phase I is completed. The District has completed their review of final contract documents for seawall (Area 2) and walkways (Areas 3 and 4) contracts. The contract for the levee and seawall is intended to be advertised in mid-November. 36. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Two Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. The estimate of Federal cost under the authorizing legislation is $1,140,000,000 (October 1986 P.L.), plus a $229,000,000 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT cash contribution from local interests and $151,000,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, included a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against storm with a recurrcnce interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans were also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project was reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94- 1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed "...the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further stated that local opposition to any plan which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, flood-proofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central Basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study considered these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Conditions as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and Congressional Guidance in House Report 94-1702. The Study schedule runs through September 1987 at an estimated cost of $21,000,000. A wide range of feasible Basin-wide alternative plans were developed. These alternatives, which were presented for extensive public review, included tunnel diversions, channel modifications, levees and floodwalls, and nonstructural measures. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the local option for detailed plan formulation. A draft Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, recommending the Pompton River/Passaic River Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1986. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 37. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. Location. On the Saw Mill River in the town of Greenburgh, N.Y. One portion known as Babbitt Court lies along the river immediately south of the Village of Elmsford. The second portion of the project, known as the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, is north of the Village of Elmsford, separated from Babbitt Court by approximately 4,000 feet. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 2.6 miles of 20 foot wide channel improvement along the Saw Mill River from the upper reaches in the Town of Greenburgh downstream to approximately Exit 7A of the New York State Thruway, with an additional 675 feet of channel modification along the tributary Mine Brook. A diversion channel will be constructed south of the Saw Mill River Parkway. The total estimated Federal cost (October 1986 P.L.) for the project is $4,600,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,530,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal which would reduce or otherwise impair their flood-carrying capacity, or provide a pumping station or additional gravity outlets, as appropriate, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is 2-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated June 12, 1974, indicated the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan, and agreed to the current Administration's cost sharing by letter dated 11 June 1986. Operation and results during period. During Phase I preconstruction planning the authorized project was found to be no longer economically justified. Phase I project reformulation to develop an alternative plan of improvement has been completed. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved January 28, 1977. Preconstruction planning started in February 1977. The final Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved in March 1986. The final Phase II General Design Memorandum is scheduled for submission in June 1987. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extend of compliance by local interests with the requirements of operation and maintenance. 39. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 40. DAM SAFETY PROGRAM Beginning in FY 1985 the New York District performed a two phase modification to Waterbury Dam in an attempt to drastically reduce or totally eliminate a long existing seepage problem at the dam. The first phase of construction is the addition of 48 inch pipe to the two existing 54 inch pipes that comprise the existing outlet works of the dam. This work was completed in July 1985 at a cost of $513,400. The second phase of work is the partial rebuilding of the toe of the dam to include a seepage filter and monitoring system and to fill voids by means of sand injection and to fill voids in the river gorge by grouting. The seepage filter was completed on 11 November 1986 at a cost of $933,100. The sand injection and gorge grouting work was completed on 17 December 1986 at a cost of $1,604,367. The sand injection and gorge grouting work was done by the Baltimore District for the New York District. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation advance preparation, emergency operations, rehabilitation, emergency drinking water, advance measures and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals and pamphlets, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response and preparation, provided in-house training to District employees in emergency operations activities, and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fighting and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District provided technical assistance and sandbags to local, county and state governmental organizations which requested such aid during several minor storm/flood events. The District received mission assignments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the provisions of PL93-288 to prepare detailed damage survey reports in Long Island New York, and Monmouth County New Jersey following the Presidential Disaster Declaration resulting from Hurricane Gloria. On Long Island the New York District surveyed 169 applicants including State Agencies, county and local governments and Fire Districts throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties. Over 900 detailed Damage Survey Report packages were completed recommending to FEMA over $56 million of eligible damages incurred by applicants. 42. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELiNE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 43. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 44. COILECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $152,966 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 45. DEAIJTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 23 projects were deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30,1986 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 3. Bronx River, N.Y. 4. Browns Creek, N.Y. 5. Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. 6. East Rockaway Inlet 7. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 8. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. New Work Approp Cost New Work Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 105,000 102,224 100,000 43,973 185,000 176,102 336,000 1,339,000 7,059,000 343,044 1,339,000 7,056,993 - - 60,000 - - 59,390 - - 199,790 - - 199,790 - - 717,000 - - 716,771 (800) 45,349 100,000 129,779 3,937 390,034 2,030,000 377,768 2,042,166 - 1,695,700 21,005 1,681,761 2-22 220,000 277,065 164,000 159,069 837,000 826,094 18,412 18,412 30,000 30,000 1,123,8061 1,095,6322 5,523,297 5,528,29727 30,168,988 30,162,050 1,149,946 1,149,946 2,844,853 2,833,3375 33,97630 33,97630 525,529 5233,781 4,590,201 4,590,2019 4,269,773 4,269,773 83,969 533,3344 7,522,736 7,522,586 594,355 594,35528 5,125,404 5,181,797 29,760 29,760 59,7605 56,6855 425,000 438,934 30,000 26,925 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30,1986 9. Hudson River, N.Y. 10. Jones Inlet, N.Y. 11. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y 12. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 13. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 15. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 1,838,256 758,400 1,314,247 1,299,002 673,000 1,792,600 ,579,097 1,873,853 98,000 1,709,966 128,500 98,000 1,699,398 137,883 - - 240,000 - 15,000 254,025 887,000 816,138 70,862, - 100,000 20,660 81,283 450,000 449,913 15,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- 358,855 -0- 975,000 971,074 95,000 64,000 535,000 44,249,8036,7,8 44,249,865 29,375,415 29,270,279 1,822,53010 1,822,530 11,265,576 11,264,490 240,000 269,025 - 235,964 235,964 4,678,8621 4,687,8491 1,141,000 1,076,282 9,422 9,422 3,390,000 937,301 681,81112 681,811 25,000 26,547 630,000 630,000 29,000 28,744 30,000 29,326 82,000 82,930 1,021,695 1,021,674 29,014,510 9,014,51122,23 Approp. 7,681,000 3,866,000 (295,000) Cost 2,6154,509 3,936,107 (296,200) 955,000 956,975 28,206,036 23,211,427 2-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30,1986 16. Newtown Creek, N.Y. 17. New York and New Jersey Channels 18. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift (Required Contributed Funds) 19. New York Harbor- Entrance Channel and Anchorage Areas 20. Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. 21. Raritan River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint & Oper Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (13,568) 53,554 12,856 12,856 94,781 94,781 50,000 50,950 1,168,354 1,168,354 1,675,342 1,676,292 73,053,435 73,052,43515,16,17 680,000 8,704,000 1,162,000 1,332,000 657,732 8,386,840 1,096,073 1,397,900 2,570,000 2,700,000 1,930,000 2,105,000 1,654,623 2,960,800 1,801,315 2,351,181 - 2,700,000 2,820,000 3,210,000 3,245,344 2,960,800 2,786,239 3,278,166 470,459 1,380,950 181,077 1,250,972 707,096 537,350 1,830,700 8,047,000 8,739,000 3,4419,900 4,033,000 7,525,976 9,132,502 3,508,699 4,130,537 58,000 58,000 6,308,359 40,657,574 19,334,000 18,571,923 42,192,89619 42,387,718 21,279,000 20,483,872 6,464,328 7,424,32229 45,009,7102c 45,009,710 40,382,524 43,202,475 198,415 198,415 256,415 256,415 - 1,,551,47021 - 1,551,47025 - 180,000 1,119,000 - 177,126 1,119,269 20,000 22,004 11,432,703 11,432,302 2-24 454,773 454,773 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30,1986 22. Rondout Harbor, N.Y. 23. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 24. Shrewsbury River, N.J. 25. Westchester Creek, N.Y. 26. Supervisor of New York Harbor 30. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (PI) (Required Contributed Funds) 31. Sea Bright to Ocean Tnp, N.J. 34. Ardsley, N.Y. 35. Liberty State Park and Seawall, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 58,000 58,000 -0- 151 80,000 79,472 832,000 784,221 483,006 526,571 660,000 660,527 - 950,000 - 932,244 560,000 577,000 564,738 576,363 - 2,900,000 2,250,000 3,445,000 220,088 2,918,123 2,224,852 3,212,342 127,660 186,169 - 2,316,000 3,967 2,251,199 4,805,000 - 1,300,000 1,435,000 - 1,252,310 1,435,815 846 45,000 32,325 15,000 -0- 20,000 -0- 83,000 83,000 25,000 20,250 142,437 142,437 200,437 200,437 -0- 173 1,145,457 1,145,457 2,472,880 2,473,879 175,9339 175,933 3,871,31111 3,853,555 28,140,447 28,622,756 21,345,356 21,03,769 17,120,961 19,438,942 2,735,000 2,687,110 443,000 415,324 225,043 200,338 2-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Include $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $1'00,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 5. Includes $68,036 for new work and $216,931 for maintenance for previous projects. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief runds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropiation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $77,182 for new work for previous projects. 10. Excludes $1,882,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $66,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 15. Includes $ 12,809,975 for new work for previous projects and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 16. Excludes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O&M funds). 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 21. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 22. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $1,490,715 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 27. Include $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 28. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. 29. Includes $400,000 Jobs Bill funds. 30. Includes $200,000 Jobs Bill funds. 2-26 TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive Eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 104 and Harbor Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully Act of 1958 by the United States. Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2,1907 July 3,1930 Mar. 4, 1913 Sept.19,1890 June 13,1902 July 3,1930 Aug. 26,1937 May 17,1950 1958 River and Harbor Act 1962 River and Harbor Act Mar. 3, 1925 Modified project to include control of waterchestnut. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide. Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from East River to Dam at East 177th Street. BROWNS CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) 6 foot channel for 1,850 feet and 4 feet for 1,350 feet, and 2 jetties. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 1,200 feet wide and not less than 30 feet deep. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westery beaches. GLEN COVE CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide. H. Doc. 337, 54th Cong. 2d Sess. (Annual Report 1899, P. 1177). Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 897, 62d Cong. 2d sess. H. Ex Doc. 22, 51st Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 122, 56th Cong., 2d sess. (Annual Report 1901, p. 1299) H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong. 1st sess. 2-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3,1930 July 1, 1935 Aug. 30,1935 June 20,1938 Sep. 3,1954 P.L. 89-72 Mar. 2,1945 Channel 27 feet below Hudson Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12-foot channel between Troy and Waterford H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany 3d sess. and Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 H. Doc. 228, 83d Cong. feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. 1st sess. Mooring facilities. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. H. Doc. 409, 77th Cong. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL99-88) Aug. 26,1937 July 14,1960 KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 11of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATER, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in inlet and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. H. Doc 181, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 8,1917 Mar. 2,1907 Feb. 27,1911 July 25,1912 Jan. 21,1927 July 3,1930 Mar. 22,1945 Mar. 2,1945 Sept. 3,1954 Oct. 23,1962 NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. H. Doc. 1387, 62d Cong., 3d sess. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ. (See Section 15 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. 20-foot channel in Passaic River. H. Doc. 707, 62d Cong., 10-foot channel in Passaic River. H. Doc. 284, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2 sess. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch S. Doc 250, 79th Cong., channel to an inshore channel at Port Neward terminal and 2d sess. remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong., Passaic River 1st sess. 34-32 foot channel in Hackensack River including approach H. Doc. 252, 82d Cong., channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port 1st sess. Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth. H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 2-28 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 7,1966 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3,1930 Sept. 6,1933 Aug. 30,1935 May 28,1935 May 17,1950 Oct. 27,1965 Mar.4, 1915 July 3,1930 Dec. 31,1970 Mar. 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two H. Doc. 494, 89th Cong., maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth 2d sess. and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel, and provision of a turning basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 feet. Additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull Report on file in the Office of by deepening to 35 feet a triangular area at the eastern the Chief of Engineers. end of the 30-foot channel south of Shooters Island. NEWTOWN CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) 20-foot channel H. Doc. 1936, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 23-foot channel Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 12-foot channel in English Kills Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 75th Cong., 1st sess. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 17 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek 1st sess. to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., vicinity of Piles Creek. 1st sess. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing H. Doc. 108, 89th Cong., to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. 1st sess. NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFI' (See Section 18 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal P.L. 91-611, 91st of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and Cong., H.R. 19877 debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 19 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, De. 27, 1886 by authority of Act of Aug. 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Annual Reports 1887, p.6 2 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1279) 2-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25,1910 Aug. 8,1917 Aug. 8,1917 July 4, 1836 July 11,1870 Sept. 19,1890 June 25,1910 Mar 2,1919 Jul. 3,1930 Jul. 3,1930 Jul. 3,1930 Aug. 26,1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Oct. 23,1962 June 10,1872 Aug. 30,1935 Oct. 27,1965 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30,1975 Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay Removal of Craven Shoal PLATISBURGH HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Construction of 1,000 feet of breakwater Extension of 400 feet to breakwater, dredging between breakwater and wharves and beach revetment Extension of 300 feet to 1,250 feet of breakwater already built. Completion of improvement by dredging areas not heretofore dredged to 9 feet. RARITAN RIVER, NJ. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Washington canal 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep thru South Channel7 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge. Channel 10 feet deep in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. Width reduced to 100 feet. Relocation of lower reach to South Channel. Channel 25 deep and 300 feet wide to junction of main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 22 of Text) Parallel dikes, branch dike, and entrance channel, 14 feet deep. Extension of 14-foot channel and for 12-foot channel., Extend 12-foot channel from mile 1.8 to 3.5. SHINNECOCK INLET, NJ. (See Section 23 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. SHREWSBURY RIVER, NJ. (See Section 24 of Text) Channel 6 feet in North Branch Channel 12 feet deep. H. Doc. 518, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 131, 23d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 89, 39th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1870, p.55. Annual Report 1889, p. 2458. H. Doc. 759, 61st Cong., 2d sess.11 H. Doc. 1341, 62d Cong., 3d. sess. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 74, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office. Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2d sess. S. Ex. Doc. 35, 42d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1872, p. 8 10 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 288, 89th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong. 1st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act H. Doc. 1296, 62d. Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 157, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 2-30 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30,1935 May 17,1950 Sept. 22,1922 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act July 3,1958 Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1976 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101(a) 1965 Flood Control Act Channel 9 feet deep. Turning basin and anchorage 6 feet at Red Bank and Channels 6 feet deep in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 25 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and two turning basins. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART 1). (See Section 30 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill, placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of the project. SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. (See Section 31 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 34 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, NJ. (See Section 35 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedestrian walkway. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ. & N.Y., PHASE I (See Section 36 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. (See Section 37 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, channel improvement. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 74th Cong. H. Doc. 285, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 332, 85th Cong., 2d sess., modified by Appr. Act for Energy and Water Dev. for FY 85. H. Doc. 215/89/1. H. Rpt. 94-1702 H. Doc. 94-465, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 2-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Completed: 1917 Cost: $1,463,014 TABLE 2-D TOTAL COSTS FOR EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 See Section Operation of Text Project Funds New York Rehabilitation Maintenance and Cost Total 6. Hudson River, Regular $38,560,839 - $1,100,517 $697,386 $44,177,215 N.Y. Public Works 238,350 - - - 238,350 Emergency Relief 311,461 - - - 311,461 TOTAL $39,110,650 - $1,100,517 $697,386 $44,727,026 16. N.Y. and N.J. Regular $57,412,152 - $1,397,899 - $69,299,856 Channels Public Works 807,000 - - - 870,000 Emergency Relief 2,023,308 - - - 2,023,308 Contributed 7,712 - - - 7,712 TOTAL $60,250,172 - $1.397,899 - $72,137,876 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (See Section 26 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1986 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore 200 b. Vessel 250 Air (helicopter) 3 Total 453 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities 3,750 b. Vessels 900 Total 4,650 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration 20 b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted 36 c. Permit not required or already under permit 53 d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney 2 e. Cases pending as of October 1,1982 130 Total 241 2-32 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1986 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek....................................................................................... Aug. 1986 Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic Rivers.....................................................Feb. 1986 Raritan River...............................................................................................Jul. 1986 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-off...............................................................Jul. 1986 Sandy Hook Bay at Leanardo .......................................................................... Aug. 1986 Shark River.................................................................................................Feb. 1986 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek......................................................................Aug. 1986 Shrewsbury River..........................................................................................Apr. 1986 NEW YORK Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels....................................................................May, Jun, Dec., 1985 Browns Creek...............................................................................................Jun 1986 Buttermilk Channel.......................................................................................* Coney Island Channel................................................................................... Jul. 1986 Coney Island Creek.......................................................................................Sep.1986 Eastchester Creek...........................................................................................* Flushing Bay & Creek....................................................................................M ar. 1986 Hudson River................................................................................................Jan, May, 1986 Hudson River Channel...................................................................................Jan, Apr, 1986 Jamaica Bay................................................................................................May 1986 Jones Inlet.................................................................................................... Jun, Jul 1986 Lake Montauk Harbor.....................................................................................* Long Island Intracoastal W aterway ................................................................ * Mattituck Harbor........................................................................................... May 1986 Narrows of Lake Champlain...........................................................................* Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic Rivers...................................................Feb, Jun, 1986 Newtown Creek.............................................................................................* New York Harbor...........................................................................................Oct, 1985-Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun 1986 New York & New Jersey Channels.................................................................. *Items for which no date is furnished reflects costs for gathering data only. Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1986 was $998,917. 2-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept, 30,1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects ReportFor Construction Maintenance Burlington Harbor Vt 1 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt.1,2 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. East Chester Creek, N.Y. East River, N.Y. Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.1 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt.1 ,2 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. 1,2 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. Great South Bay, N.Y.' Greenport Harbor, N.Y.' Harlem River, N.Y.1 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Keyport Harbor, N.J. Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)2,3 Little Neck Bay, N.Y.1 Mamaroneck harbor, N.Y. Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive)3 Matawan Creek, N.J. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. Milton Harbor, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y 1 ,2 Northport Harbor, N.Y 1 Orowoc Creek, N.Y.(Inactive) 3 Otter Creek, Vt. Peconic River, N.Y.1 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y.1 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Yi' Port Jefferson Harbor Raritan River to Authur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.1 Sag Harbor, N.Y.' St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt'1,2 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J.1 ,2 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y 1 ,2 Shark River, N.J. Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. Shooters Island, N.Y. & N.J. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. 1,2 1966 1909 1973 1985 1985 1953 1984 1892 1972 1980 1962 1976 1974 1953 1969 1969 1980 1985 1985 1984 1970 1937 1969 1981 1948 1984 1981 1984 1971 1956 1949 1977 1953 1951 1985 1931 1977 1972 1895 1964 1917 1'985 1967 1968 1984 1948 1984 1983 1973 1895 2-34 706,414 9 31,000 111,371 592,056 32,723,700 12 64,584 2,102,905 7 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 15 266,857 74,681 3,616,119 39,468 6,771,870 27 4,545,753 40,475 791,68011 76,065 6,621 1,741,21019 513,764 21,000 177,925 32 151,37318 73,2148 78,644 23 60,254 25,000 19,400 433,470 69,406 25 221,128 3 810,500 98,468 121,805 26 3,125 508,936 56,470 81,905 488,048 29 33,828 124,57220 100,000 7,730,476 7,000 283,556 1,288 284,109 1,471,810 4,448,80012 11,571 4,352,089 115 255,291 292,919 88,029 457 1,290,469 21,720 480,777 76,497 16 24,970,637 2,604,547 848,130 849,709 267,768 1,621 537 551,677 4,636 237,097 935,786 986,520 142,411 1,487 4,951 27,059 116,509 66,037 1,060,100 1,299 359,294 2,019,141 249 11,710 385 3,902,330 93,964 169,18128 1,129,100 29 5,364 1,104,940 21 1133 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30,1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects ReportFor Construction Maintenance Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. 1 1974 69,836 431,199 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. 1 1953 18,174 36,312 Wappinger Creek, N.Y.1 ,2 1950 13,000 44,691 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.1 1953 206,116 212,827 30 Waycake Creek, N.J.2 ,3 1949 - 2,781 Woodbridge Creek, N.JJ1 1953 48,823 178,398 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 7. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $580,425 contributed funds other and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 11. Excludes $82,738 expended for new work from Navy Dept. funds. 12. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 13. Includes $4,813,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 16. Included $64,034 for maintenance of previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 18. Excludes $119,276 required contributed funds and $72,619 other contributed funds. 19. Excluded $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 27. Includes $668,820 public works funds. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 29. Includes $338,048 contributed funds. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. 32. Excludes $34,580 for new work from contributed funds. 2-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30,1986 ForLast Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets 1959 - - Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 1981 18,044,667 217,899 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,880,000 - Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 - - TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Construction to Sept. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects ReportFor Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass1 1964 6,282,3072- Bennington, Vt. 1974 670,000 - Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn.1,3 1959 363,515- East BarreDam, Winooski River, Vt 1 1963 2,832,084- East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) 1976 1,185,365- Elizabeth, N.J. 1985 54,091,740 - Fire Island to Montauk Point N.Y. 1984 12,441,8646 143,753 Herkimer, N.Y. 1973 1,201,2759 - Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.1 1956 1,064,626 - Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams 4,5,6 1939 - - Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt. 1,3 1965 221,476 - North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. 1968 15,409,3257 - North Ellenville, N.Y. 1978 3,900,650 - Rahway, N.J. 1971 973,1428 - Rahway, South Branch, N.J. 1979 15,863,723 - Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 1981 11,061,256 262 Rosendale, N.Y. 1975 3,684,966 - Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt.4 1963 211,015 - Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. 1976 109,702 - South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.1 1967 1,564,976 - South Ellenville, N.Y. 1984 289,702 - South Orange, N.J. 1981 6,857,484 - Staten Island, N.Y. 1983 644,998 - Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y.1,3 1959 142,075 Waterbury Reservoir, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1976 886,769 8,200 Winooski River, Vt.1 1940 5,897,427 - Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1970 1,549,929- Yonkers, N.Y. 1984 13,641,77110 2-36 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 1. Completed. 6. Includes $3,788,341 contributed funds. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under otheer contributed funds. Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 4. Inactive. 5,1977. 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 10. Includes $622,871 contributed funds. TABLE 2-J SURVEYS (See Section 43 of Text) Study Class Cost Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Studies Special Studies 1 Total Surveys $400,606 1,651,988 0 2,829,269 4,882,269 1Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inspection of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, International Water Studies Investigations, Review of FERC Licenses and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (See Section 44 of Text) Studies and Services Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $87,966 Flood Plain Management Unit 65,000 Total 152,966 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 45 of Text) ForLast Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects ReportFor Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Bronx River, N.Y.4 ,6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 1,159,94612 10,000 1,947,8536 Brown's Creek, N.Y. 1980 Aug. 1977 33,976 33,976 8 - 505,369 Cheesequake Creek, N.J.4,6 1963 Aug. 1982 40,000 40,000 - 30,675 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4,6 1952 Aug. 1982 69,489 69,489 - 1,622 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. 1963 Aug. 1977 3503,96913 100,000 829,421 - Elizabeth, N.J. 1948 Aug. 1977 60,481 60,481 - 59,391 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. 1966 Aug. 1977 165,882 165,8824,11 - 2,455 2-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-M (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 45 of Text) ForLast Full Report Ite Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects ReportFor Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Hudson River, NY to Albany 4 1 8 1982 Aug. 1982 -... Huntington Harbor, N.Y. 1953 Aug. 1977 49,035 68,5814,5,14 19,546 51,566 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. 1947 Aug. 1977. - - - Lamoille River, Vt. 1939 Aug. 1977 49,837 49,837 - - Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J.16 1982 Aug. 1982- - - - New York and New Jersey 1982 Aug. 1982- - - - Channels4,17 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. 2 ,3 1967 Aug.1977 433,470 433,4704 - 441,656 Proctor, Otter Creek, Basin, Vt.6,7 1937 Aug. 1977 - - - Rahway River, '79 1948 Aug. 1982 - 37,000' - 307 Raritan River, N.J.4,6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,551,470 1,617,47015 66,000 10,113,903 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y.6 ,7 1959 Aug. 1982 7,000 7,000 - - Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive) 1888 Aug. 1977 - 70,500' - 235 Ticonderoga River, N.Y.1,6 1895 Nov. 1983 167,760 16,500 - 1,260 Waterbury (1941 Act), Vt.7,6 1951 Nov. 1981 9,253 9,253 -- Waterford, N.Y. 6 ,7 1939 Aug. 1982- - - - Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1981 Aug. 1982 175,933 175,933 - 2,921,311 1. No commerce reported. 10. Under Section 12 Public Law 93-251. 2. Completed. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 3. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. Uncomplete portion deauthorized. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from 14. Includes $19,546 expended from contributed funds. contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Inactive. 16. 1912 authorization. 7. Entire project deauthorized. 17. 1935 authorization. 8. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 18. 1910 construction dikes. 9. Deferred. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 (See Section 29 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept.30,1986 COMPLETE RECONNANISSANCE REPORT LaPlatte River, Shelburne Bay, Vt. COMPLETE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. $3 $7,500 30,253 2-38 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 (See Section 33 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept, 30,1986 COMPLETE DETAILED PROJECT STUDY Orchard Beach, Bronx, N.Y. $1,864 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 (See Section 41 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30,1986 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Bashbish Brook, Copake, N.Y. $7,500 CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT STUDIES E. Canada Creek, Dolgeville, N.Y. $40,775 Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. 53,454 Missisquoi River, Vt. 37,122 Ramapo River,. Monroe, N.Y. 465 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. 9,819 Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. 15,138 COMPLETE DETAILED PROJECT STUDIES Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. $8,639 Lake Champlain, Plattsburgh, N.Y. 10,600 Sawkill Creek, Kingston, N.Y. 3,652 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Passaic River (Field Emergency $6,098 Preparedness System), N.J. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Wallkill River (Black Dirt Area), N.Y. 0 2-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 (See Section 42 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept.30,1986 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Dune Road, Southampton, N.Y. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Green Brook, Green Brook, N.J. $8,916 COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y. $2,486 2-40 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ...................... 3-2 2. Cohansey River, NJ ..................... 3-2 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ.................... 3-2 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA, and Trenton, NJ ......... 3-3 5. Delaware River, PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the Sea .................. 3-4 6. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE............ 3-4 7. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE ...................... 3-5 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD........... 3-6 9. Manasquan River, NJ ................... 3-7 10. Mispillion River, DE..................... 3-7 11. Murderkill River, DE .................... 3-7 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 3-8 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway ......... 3-8 14. Schuylkill River, PA ..................... 3-9 15. Tuckerton Creek, NJ .................... 3-9 16. Wilmington Harbor, DE ................. 3-10 Beach Erosion Control 17. Shoreline Erosion Control ........... 18. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ......... Page .... 3-10 .... 3-10 Flood Control Local Protection cont. Page 24. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA .............. 3-12 25. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ......................... 3-13 26. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... 3-13 27. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ......... .3-13 28. Prompton Lake, PA .................... 3-13 29. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys ............................. 3-14 30. National Emergency Preparedness ........ 3-14 General Investigations 31. Surveys .......................... 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... Tables TABLE 3-A TABLE 3-B TABLE 3-C TABLE 3-D TABLE 3-E TABLE 3-F TABLE 3-G Cost and Financial Statement ..... Authorizing Legislation .......... Other Authorized Navigation Projects............ Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... Multiple Purpose Project Including Power ................ Deauthorized Projects ........... Page .. 3-14 .. 3-14 Page V 3-15 3-18 3-21 3-23 3-23 3-24 3-24 Flood Control Local Protection Page 19. Beltzville Lake, PA..................... 3-11 20. Blue Marsh Lake, PA................... 3-11 21. Delaware Coast Protection, DE ........... .3-11 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 3-12 23. Emergency Bank Protection ............. .3-12 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Existing project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep through inlet and 10 feet through outer bar, channel to be protected by two converging stone jetties extending to 12-foot contour in the ocean and spaced 1,000 feet apart at outer ends; a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from gorge in inlet to Oyster Creek Channel just northwest of Sunset Shoal, thence via Oyster Creek Channel to deep water in the Bay; and maintenance of a channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat City harbor with main inlet channel. Total length of section included in project is about 4.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Extreme tidal range at inlet is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Project was completed in 1940. (For details, see page 203, Annual Report for 1964.) (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Recommended modifications: The existing Federal project at the inlet, which was completed in 1940, has failed to maintain a suitable and safe channel for navigation. As a result of the finding of AE&D studies on this matter, the Chief of Engineers decided on 20 January 1983 that modification to the project should be implemented to correct a design deficiency. The recommended modification would serve to correct the design deficiency through the construction of a new south jetty aligned more nearly parallel to the existing north jetty, the dredging and maintenance of a new realigned navigation channel, and the removal of a shoal located between the proposed navigation channel and the north jetty. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Maintenance dredging by U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge FRY was performed from 05 May 1986 to 04 July 1986. Removed an estimated 24,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $237,800; dredging by Currituck was performed from 01 July 1986 to 07 August 1986 removing 63,964 cubic yards of material at a cost of $147,600. Work also included general maintenance, engineering surveys on dredging, and supervision and administration. 2. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ Location: Rises in Salem County, NJ, flows southerly and southwesterly 27 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into Delaware Bay about 62 miles below Philadelphia, Pa. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous projects: For details see page 1785, Annual Report for 1915, and page 348, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from that depth in Delaware Bay through a neck of land at the mouth and within the river to the south side of Glass Street in Bridgeton, 19 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Broad Street; and thence 75 feet wide to Commerce Street Bridge, 19.25 miles above the mouth; and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 800 feet long formed by widening the channel on the south side to a maximum width of 250 feet just below Glass Street. Section included in project is about 19.5 miles long. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. Extreme tidal range is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Completed project cost $110,756 for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Existing project was completed in 1939. Local cooperation: Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for required maintenance. Terminal facilities: Twenty wharves, of which 16 are at Bridgeton and 4 at Greenwich. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Cultural Resource Investigation, maintenance dredging at the mouth of the Cohansey River from 02 June 1986 to 30 September 1986 removing 350,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,127,510. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update, environmental assessment and monitoring, plans and specifications on maintenance dredging, engineering surveys on dredging, and supervision and administration. 3. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor, which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, dredging by Currituck from 16 June 1986 to 30 June 1986 and 08 August 1986 to 14 August 1986 removing 3,502 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $82,000. Work also included general maintenance and plans and specifications. 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA, AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects: For details see page 1778 of Annual Report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central Railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 mile long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1984.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966) Corps of Engineers). Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included operation of stream gages in USGS cooperative stream gaging program and maintenance dredging. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included maintenance dredging from 01 October 1985 to 18 January 1986 removing a total of 645,322 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,413,504. Other work included maintenance on surveys, supervision and administration on maintenance dredging, and general engineering and design. 3-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 5. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000- foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-C at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1984.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of Mifflin Range, Mantua Creek Anchorage, and New Castle Range performed by Norfolk Dredging Company during period 1 October 1985 through 31 December 1986. Removed a total of 2,025,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $7,085,500. Maintenance dredging of Cherry Island, Marcus Hook Anchorage and New Castle Range was performed by Norfolk Dredging Company during period of 28 May 1986 through 30 September 1986. Removed a total of 2,700,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $3,535,730. Other work included sturgeon studies, lease and maintenance of equipment for disposal areas, construction of dikes and sluices at disposal areas, general maintenance, disposal area groundwater testing, subsurface exploration, replaced sluice pipes, and operation of stream gages by USGS. Maintenance, hired labor: Dredging performed by U.S. Hopper Dredge McFarland during the period 20 August 1986 through 30 September 1986. Removed 785,208 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,590,000. Other work included engineering survey, miscellaneous environmental research coordination, maintenance of disposal area equipment, general maintenance, sturgeon studies, snagging and clearing, debris removal, ditching at disposal areas, environmental assessment, subsurface explorations, handling shore pipe, engineering and design, supervision and administration, and plans and specifications on surveys and dredging. 6. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous projects: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. The cost for new work for the completed project was $511,210, exclusive of $10,000 expended on previous projects and exclusive of $210,000 contributed funds. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local Cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included preparing BCR update and project monitoring. 7. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence through marshes back of Cape Henlopen to Lewes River; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous projects: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, VA to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of one highway bridge and on railroad Bridge at Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The cost for new work for the completed portion of the project was $561,514 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $60,000 contributed funds. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 3-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 8. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE AND MD Location: Begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1977). Total estimated cost of new work including original purchase is $151,683,755. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954). (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rightsof- way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16,1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging performed by Norfolk Dredging Company in the Upper Chesapeake Bay during the period 9 September 1986 through 30 September 1986, removing a total of 100,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $360,000. Other work included maintenance of Chesapeake City, Summit, St. Georges and Reedy Point bridges. Maintenance, hired labor: General maintenance of disposal areas; maintenance of rip-rap, roadways, night lighting, buildings and grounds, banks, auxiliary works and traffic controlled TV, environmental drainage of disposal areas, disposal area construction, lease equipment, Reedy Pt. bridge overlay, fish and wildlife study, bridge inspection, trash removal, subsurface investigation and testing of disposal areas, and supervision and administration. 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT 9. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ Location: This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795.) Previous projects: For details see Annual report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project: A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet to a depth of 8 feet; for a 19-acre anchorage to 10 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of Route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10-and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10 and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Restoration of bulkheads completed 16 August 1965 at a cost of $117,807. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19-acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5-acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities: Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included CERC and air monitoring, repairs to north Bulkhead, and monitoring jetty. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 10. MISPILLION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous projects: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water; in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included rip-rap bank stabilization, plan and specifications on maintenance dredging. 11. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual 3-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Report for 1892.) Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging was done at the entrance to the canal by Garden State Dredging Company from 20 August 1986 to 30 September 1986 removing 9,500 cubic yards of material at a cost of $19,000 Maintenance, hired labor: Maintenance dredging, plans and specifications and supervision and administration. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant To Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1986 Detail Project Reports Schuylkill River-Fairmount Park, Pa. $17,638 Plans and Specifications Wilmington Harbor, DE $19,463 13. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May Point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Docl33,76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead- Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Dredging performed by Spickard Enterprises on the Cape May Canal, Great Sound and Shad Islands from 10 April 1986 through 30 September 1986 removed 400,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $935,300. Other work included general maintenance, Pt. Pleasant Canal Bulkhead design, erosion report on West End Cape May Canal, and maintenance dredging. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, BCR update, plans and specifications, erosion construction, lease plant dredging, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 14. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included plans and specifications, and supervision and administration on maintenance dredging. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included environmental monitoring, plans and specifications, dredging surveys, supervision and administration, and general maintenance. 15. TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ Location: This creek rises in Ocean County, NJ flows southerly 7 miles, and empties into Little Egg Harbor about 8 miles north of Little Egg Inlet. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 825 and 1216.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide from the head of Marchelder Channel in Little Tuckerton Bay to the mouth; thence 75 feet wide to Parkers Landing, 1 mile above the mouth; thence 60 feet wide to West Tuckerton Landing, 1.75 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 5 feet deep and 60 feet wide to just above Scow Landing, 2 miles above the mouth; and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 40 feet wide to the mill dam at Tuckerton 2.25 miles above the mouth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 3.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The mean tidal range is 2.5 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. The cost of new work for the complete project was $60,242. (See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of wharves and piers ofpile-and-timber construction along the creek. There are also four boatyards with marine railways, and repair and storage facilities located at Tuckerton. One wharf at Tuckerton is publicly owned. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 3-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR update. 16. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 35 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962. See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging in the Christina River was performed by the American Dredging Co. during the period 20 December 1985 through 23 January 1986 removing 509,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $499,017; during the period 06 June 1986 through 24 September 1986 removing 283,832 cubic yards of material at a cost of $474,600. Other work included design of Wilmington Harbor South, Water Quality Study, subsurface explorations, design and field testing of the American Shad monitoring program, and preliminary development of the evaluation factors to be used for the procurement of the artificial reefs. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, plans and specifications, inspections of subsurface explorations, design and analysis of embankment construction, inpervious borrow investigations, monitoring of construction operations, design of dikes, instrumentation monitoring, and engineering and design. Beach Erosion Control: 17. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location: Demonstration projects were undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites were only monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project: Section 54 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measure, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program was not to solve individual problems, so much as to explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines, and provide this information to private and public landowners. The construction and evaluation at all sites are completed and information dissemination has been started. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Only costs incurred were in support of information dissemination program. Cost during this period was $1,101.48. 18. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Name of project Cost to 30 Sep 1986 Detailed Project Reports North Shore-Indian River Inlet South Shore-Indian River Inlet $55,764.00 50,699.00 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Flood Control 19. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: A multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16, 1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and maintenance, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, correcting electric problems, water quality data collection and monitoring, and repairing outlet Channel side slope. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, annual safety inspection, water quality monitoring, instrumentation survey, operation of stream gages in cooperative stream gaging program, sedimentation survey, inundation mapping, dam safety training, tower leakage monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 20. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with at spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project (October 1984), $63,163,791 includes $16,132,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and maintenance, recreation area well drilling, recreation area operation and maintenance, snow survey, stream gage operation in cooperative stream gaging program, water quality testing and monitoring, recreation area mowing and fertilizing janitorial services, trash removal, dam break analysis, sewage treatment plant maintenance, lawn maintenance, dam survey recreation safety program, sewage vacuum system, and costs incurred for Bern and Heidelberg Township police. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included reservoir operation and maintenance, annual safety inspection, water quality monitoring, instrumentation survey, snow survey, stream gage operation in cooperative stream gaging program, sedimentation survey, plans and specifications to correct shoreline erosion, dam break analysis, sewage vacuum system, seasonal employment, dam safety training, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 21. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement 3-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 which consists of the construction of dunes and beach fill; the construction of bulkheads at Rehoboth and Dewey beaches; periodic nourishment of the beaches; placement of sand fences; planting dune grass; and maintenance and replacement of existing structures. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1985) $14,300,000 includes $2,700,000 required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated with the rest of the project. Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included construction of Feeder Beach, statistical analysis, survey of bypass plant site, and advance engineering and design. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included continuation of engineering and design. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1986 Reconnaissance Reports Pennypack, Hatboro, PA $2,949.00 Plans and Specifications Delaware River, Port Jervis, NY $42,240.00 Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co., PA $74,052.00 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $220,715 for disaster preparedness, and $12,419 for emergency operations. 23. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency bank protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Darby Creek - Lansdowne Borough, PA Revolving Funds $ 7,500.00 Detail Project Study 41,500.00 Initial Contract 10,000.00 Perkiomen Creek- Berks County, PA Revolving Funds $ 7,500.00 Detail Project Study 19,000.00 Construction 40,900.00 24. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA.) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 263 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 180,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 2,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1985) is $127,000,000 including $110,700,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is now underway. Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1982. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and minor maintenance, master planning data collection, monumentation survey, snow survey, stream gage operation in cooperative stream gaging program, stream gage repair, water quality testing, instrumentation survey and general equipment maintenance, and master plan data collection. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included initial filling plan, emergency planning, analysis mapping, reservoir data collection, reservoir operation and minor maintenance, instrumentation surveillance, minor 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT maintenance of recreation facilities, periodic inspections, stream gage operation in USGS cooperative stream gaging program, annual safety inspection, general engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 25. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Federal cost of new work was $4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Project completed in June 1960. Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included reservoir operation and maintenance, stream gage operation in USGS cooperative stream gaging program, and dam survey. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included inundation mapping, reservoir operation and minor maintenance, safety and engineering inspections, stream gage operation in cooperative stream gaging program, instrumentation and surveillance analysis, general engineering and design, trash boom construction, dam break analysis, dam surveys, and supervision and administration. 26. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT Lehigh River at Allentown, PA Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA Delaware River at East Branch, NY Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ Chester River at Chester, PA Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection INSPECTION DATES 25 October 1985 17 April 1986 30 October 1985 24 April 1986 6 November 1985 30 April 1986 17 October 1985 28 April 1986 10 October 1985 29 April 1986 10 & 11 October 1985 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $11,145. Total costs were $104,882. 27. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-Federal levees were conducted at a cost of $1,838 at the following sites: Port Jervis, NY 23 December 1985 28. PROMPTON LAKE, PA Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, Pa., and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, Pa.) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet; 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 3-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 1985) is $43,300,000 including $38,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was advance engineering and design. Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Therefore resumption of planning will take place when funds are made available. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included operation and minor maintenance, water quality monitoring, USGS cooperative stream gaging, survey analysis, dam survey, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included inundation mapping, dam break analysis, annual safety inspection, dam safety training, water quality data collection, instrumentation and surveillance, dam survey, repair of instrumentation and engineering and design. 29. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Murderkill Mispillion Salem River Cohansey River Alloway Creek Date Survey Conducted 8 January 1986 14 January 1986 20 February 1986 8 July 1986 September 1986 30. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $171,055. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 31. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $858,560 for navigation studies: $208,873 for flood control studies: $679,087 for special studies: a total of $1,746,520. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $277,304. 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Cohansey River, N.J. (Regular Funds) 3. Cold Springs Inlet, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Delaware River Between Philadelphia, Pa. and Trenton, N.J. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds)* 6. Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Inland Waterway Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 703,000 680,607 30,000 11,049 396,000 395,501 967,000 968,187 210,000 206,975 670,000 694,337 -3,000 15,951 112,000 112,554 15,000 3,022 289,000 286,860 66,000 65,367 -1,000 -1,385 110,000 61,094 515,000 509,472 1,434,000 1,424,916 266,000 264,703 298,125 3,328,000 3,005,000 298,476 3,321,857 3,009,484 16,782,000 21,533,300 25,051,285 14,309,000 16,775,510 21,639,776 25,051,285 14,287,846 -16,000 697 114,000 112,228 4,000 4,171 30,000 32,572 22,000 20,617 19,000 16,346 64,000 65,196 208,000 208,523 3-15 783,849 719,940 10,525,135 10,517,325 300,000 300,000 146,75620 146,75620 2,272,931 2,263,214 879,275 879,275 2,656,507 2,654.824 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,0008 150,0008 72,147,8001 72,147,8001 32,841,8602 32,840,1982 15,000 15,000 57,879,872; 57,879,872; 323,944,1524 323,904,8014 508,324 508,324 511,2105 511,2105 2,827,923 2,827,736 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 561,514 561,514 1,531,978 1,529,847 60,000 60,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (Regular Funds) 9. Manasquan River, N.J. (Regular Funds) * (Contributed Funds) 10. Mispillion River, Del. (Regular Funds) 11. Murderkill River, Del. (Regular Funds) 12. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Schuylkill River, Pa. (Regular Funds) 14. Tuckerton Creek, N.J. 15. Wilmington Harbor, Del. (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - 297 12,045,500 10,488,275 12,068,000 12,216,932 10,666,460 11,940,091 15,000 94,659 177,314 5,235 25,000 40,081 1,028 11,000 11,000 273,000 264,024 84,705 7,500 7,500 111,000 110,600 159,000 160,280 11,129,053 11,295,557 23,000 34,520 995 211,000 210,107 153,000 149,713 818,000 1,121,000 979,000 2,563,300 849,876 1,152,487 981,788 2,560,370 770,100 1,241,000 1,693,000 125,000 768,856 1,244,884 1,641,466 125,433 - - - 15,000 - - - 14,943 2,011,000 2,006,000 3,226,600 4,207,700 1,980,620 2,069,777 3,215,739 4,217,572 3-16 132,535,5916 132,532,5986 159,564,7587 159,519,3667 577,24915 577,24915 3,417,55716 3,419,45316 7,410,60019 7,429,55819 300,000 300,000 385,34817 385,34817 1,581,56618* 1,573,33618* 253,491 253,491 37,630 37,630 1,268,355 1,265,067 71,5499 71,5499 22,145,87110 22,142,71210 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 3,334,00711 3,334,00711 26,067,033 26,066,819 60,242 60,242 638,917 638,860 1,954,72512 1,954,72512 35,005,465 34,997,130 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. - - - - 60,000 Cost - - - - 60,000 16. Beltzville Lake, New Work Pa. Approp. - - - - 22,931,831 (Regular Cost - - - - 22,931,130 Funds) Maint. Approp. 721,000 655,800 521,000 515,000 5,318,175 Cost 691,749 713,170 521,407 496,875 5,298,264 17. Blue Marsh New Work Lake, Pa. Approp. - - - - 63,180,300 (Regular Cost 118,186 3,212 - - 63,163,790 Funds) Maint. Approp. 787,000 1,002,200 1,186,000 1,053,000 6,562,200 Cost 742,145 1,068,725 1,167,543 1,058,095 6,522,634 18. Delaware Coast New Work Protection Approp. 50,000 775,000 200,000 550,000 3,003,95321 (Regular Funds) Cost 43,580 455,165 120,542 148,701 2,196,89221 Maint. Approp. - 88,000 - - 215,350 Cost - 88,000 - - 215,350 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. 85,000 -921 - - 1,033,473 Cost 69,557 11,538 614,809 1,052 1,033,473 19. Francis E. New Work Walter Dam, Pa. Approp. - - - - 11,503,432' 3 (Regular Cost - - 1,460 - 11,503,432'3 Funds) Maint. Approp. 331,000 383,700 422,000 460,000 4,993,521 Cost 330,420 388,882 421,975 449,970 4,972,623 20. General Edgar New Work Jadwin Dam and Approp. - - - - 4,073,105 Resevoir, Pa. Cost - - - - 4,073,105 (Regular Maint. Funds) Approp. 104,000 74,200 243,000 222,000 1,612,564 Cost 91,463 88,156 242,742 210,796 1,601,032 21. Prompton Lake New Work Pa, Approp. - - - - 4,609,483' 4 (Regular Cost - - - - 4,609,48314 Funds)* Maint. Approp. 167,000 298,000 353,000 287,000 2,700,162 Cost 173,611 306,608 348,359 295,841 2,697,724 * Total Adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 2. Included $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 3. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 4. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 5. Excludes $10,000 for previous project. 6. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 7. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Jobs Bill funds. 8. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 9. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. ** For Construction, General funds only on legislative Phase I AE&D, or support work for Phase II AE&D. 10. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 11. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 12. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 13. Includes $40,000 appropriated and expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 14. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excludes $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 15. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 16. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 18. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 19. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 20. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $438,953 AE&D. 3-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 19384 Mar. 2, 19456 Mar. 2, 19455 Mar. 2, 19456 Sept. 3, 1954 Work Authorized BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4,270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep over entire project. Channel 12 feet deep to Glass Street, thence 8 feet to Commerce Street with turning basin. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Alleghney Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge. Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12- foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA. A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia- Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Con., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 236, 99th Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 645, 59th Cong. 1st sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess.' H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong. 1st sess.' H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess.' Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2d sess. 3-18 TABLE 3-B (Continued) PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Sept. 3, 1954 July 13, 1982 July 1, 1954 Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 6 of text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 7 of Text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties.6. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD. (See Section 8 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay at water of that depth in the bay, including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, with a minimum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high level fixed railroad bridge over cutoff; high level fixed highway bridge at Reedy Point and Summit; and an anchorage in Elk River 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, averaging 3,700 feet long. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages.7 MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 10 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extension of south jetty. Extension of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ, to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83rd Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 83, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' S. Soc. 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52nd Cong. 1st sess. (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 525 79th Cong., 2nd sess. 3-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 3-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA. (See Section 14 of Text) Aug. 8, 1917 Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to H. Doc. 1270, 64th University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1930 A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restora- Rivers and Harbors tion and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 1 July 24, 1946 A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restora- H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., tion of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University 2d sess. 1 Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. TUCKERTON CREEK, NJ (See Section 15 of Text) June 13, 1902 For depths of 6, 5 and 3 feet. H. Doc. 274, 56th Cong. 1st sess. Mar. 3, 1905 Substitution of channel as across Little Tuckerton Bay. Specified in act. (H. Doc. 1040, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 16 of Text) June 3, 1896 Depths of 21, 10 and 7 feet and jetties. H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 1250' July 25, 1912 Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., maintenance of project. 2nd sess. Sept. 22, 1922 Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., of new south jetty. 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1930 A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or Rivers and Harbors removal of a portion of north jetty. Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Aug. 30, 19358 Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Rivers and Harbors Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of Committee Doc. 32 structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 17, 1940 Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is 3rd sess. properly maintained without expense to the United States. July 14, 1960 A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including S. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet 2d sess. wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Also Public Works Administration. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Completed Projects Status Report for Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1969 11,935 167,682* Absecon Inlet, NJ COMPLETED 1984 534,209 5,939,362 Appoquinimink River, DE COMPLETED 1931 36,973 41,270 Big Timber Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1962 58,6652 53,986* Broadkill River, DE COMPLETED 1976 68,228 243,641 Cape May Inlet, NJ COMPLETED 1984 149,995 1,115.354 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE COMPLETED - 256,100 - Cold Spring Inlet, NJ COMPLETED 1984 879,275 2,391,507 Cooper River, NJ' COMPLETED 1962 33,102 379,244* Delaware River at Camden, NJ COMPLETED 1982 464,906 362,79912 Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ COMPLETED - 256,624 - Double Creek, NJ1 COMPLETED 1912 7,800 -5 Harbor of Refuge COMPLETED 1985 516,230 1,104,769 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED 1981 168,41218's 98,36019 Little River, DE COMPLETED 1980 12,016 288,310 Mantua Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1966 169,687 339,340* Maurice River, NJ COMPLETED 1948 - - Delaware Bay to Millville fixed Bridge COMPLETED - 143,98410 147,050 Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project SEE TABLE 3-G **Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA COMPLETED 1968 128,20321 54,601 Oldmans Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1941 31,188 32,125 **Pepper Creek, DE' COMPLETED 1965 138,09422 1,797* Raccoon Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1981 83,66520 341,734 Salem River COMPLETED 1985 107,634 1,317,778 St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon""1 COMPLETED - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and entrance at mouth - - - Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA' COMPLETED 1955 4,291,810 -5 Smyrna River, DE 1949 - - Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing' 5 COMPLETED - 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge SEE TABLE 3-G - - - Toms River, NJ 1950 - - Channel 5 feet deep' COMPLETED - 10,050 33,311 Channel 12 feet deep9 SEE TABLE 3-G - - - Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Reboboth Bay, DE COMPLETED 1981 90,908 241,497 Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1940 27,09316 56,474 For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Inactive Projects Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek, NJ1 INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control 1975 87,594 - Chester River, PA3 INACTIVE 1931 6,000 1,139 Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA'- 6 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE'-6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ" 4 INACTIVE -7 15,048 - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE - - 3-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Cont'd) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report for Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon1 ,1 1 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth 9 DEFERRED - - - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Includes $6,000 new work and $63 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 4. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. 5. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 6. Harbor not now required by commerce. 7. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 8. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 9. Deferred 10. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 12. Excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 16. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 18. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 19. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous projects. 20. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 21. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 22. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal Funds. *Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. **Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ ACTIVE* 1978 314,400 - Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ ACTIVE* 1978 387,882 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ ACTIVE* - - - Atlantic City, NJ INACTIVE 1972 2,083,289 - Ocean City, NJ INACTIVE 1969 395,8313 -' Stone Harbor, NJ INACTIVE 1961 - -' Barnegat Light, NJ DEFERRED 1964 70,908 - Cape May City, NJ DEFERRED 1961 22,9572 1-' Long Beach Island, NJ DEFERRED 1964 40,665 -_1 North Wildwood, NJ DEFERRED 1961 - - Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE4 1965 326,116 -' Ventnor, Margate and Longport, NJ DEFERRED 1961 - - 1. Operation and maintenance required by law to be assumed by 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal local interests. participation expended under Public Works Acceleration Program 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended for for Extension of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. extension to two groins. 4. This project was included in and modified by the Delaware Coast project. * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 -1 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 - Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 -1 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA ACTIVE 1984 335,299 - Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1984 524,373 - Trexler Lake, PA' INACTIVE 1981 Aquashicola Reservoir, PA2 DEFERRED 1963 - - Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA2 DEFERRED 1963 - - 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. New project deferred. 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. 4. Transferred to Baltimore Dist. in 1982. 3-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 3-F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Tocks Island, PA, NJ and NY2 1979 65,106,2601 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) PA2 1979 195,223 - 1. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. / authority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required 2. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps' to proceed with the project. TABLE 3-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended 3 Oct 78 Appoquinimink River, DE 1 1931 HD 95-351 $ 78,243- 5 Aug 77 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink 1917 HD 94-192 - - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project 2 2 Nov 79 Oldmans Creek, NJ 1941 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313 - 2 Nov 79 Rancocas River, NJ4 1942 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590- 2 Nov 79 Smyrna River, DE5 1949 HD 95-157 $396,169- Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. 2 Nov 79 Toms River, NJ6 1950 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 43,361- Channel 12 feet deep Flood Control Projects 2 Nov 79 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA7 1966 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. There is no need now for this portion of the project. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050 new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 3-24 1. 2. 3. 4. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA ............... 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ....... 3. Chester River, MD .................... 4. Claiborne Harbor, MD . ............... 5. Fishing Creek, MD .................... 6. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD ....................... 7. Herring Creek, MD .................... 8. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD....................... 9. Little Wicomico River, VA ............. 10. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD....................... 11. Lowes Wharf, MD .................... 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ................ 13. Parish Creek, MD................... 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ................ 15. Potomac River-Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC .......... 16. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD ............... 17. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD .......... 18. St. Patricks Creek, MD ................ 19. Slaughter Creek, MD .................. 20. Tred Avon River, MD ................. 21. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD.................... 22. Upper Thorofare, MD ................. 23. Washington Harbor, DC ............... 24. Wicomico River, MD .................. Page Navigation (cont'd) 25. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys... 4-3 26. Navigation work under special authorization..................... 4-4 4-4 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-6 4-6 4-6 4-6 4-7 4-7 Beach Erosion Control 27. Colonial Beach, VA .................. 28. Beach Erosion Control Work under special authorization ........... Flood Control 29. Bloomington Lake, MD and WV ....... 30. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ..... 31. Lackawanna River Basin, PA ........... 31A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ........... 32. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ................... 33. Southern New York Flood 33A. 33B. 4-7 33C. 33D. 4-8 33E. 33F. 33G. 4-8 33H. 4-8 33I. 4-8 33J. 4-9 33K. 4-9 33L. 33M. 4-9 33N. 4-10 34. 4-10 35. 4-10 Control Projects ................... Addison, NY ......................... Almond Lake, NY ..................... Arkport Dam, NY ................... Avoca, NY .......................... Binghamton, NY.................... Canisteo, NY ......................... Corning, NY ......................... East Sidney Lake, NY ................. Elmira, NY .......................... Hornell, NY......................... Lisle, NY ............................ Oxford, NY .......................... Whitney Point Lake, NY ............... Whitney Point Village, NY ............. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA .. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ................ Page 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-12 4-12 4-12 4-12 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-13 4-14 4-14 4-14 4-15 4-15 4-15 4-16 4-16 4-16 4-16 4-16 4-17 4-1 ] REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Flood Control (cont'd) 35A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ................. 35B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ............ 36. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA . 36A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ............... 36B. Curwensville Lake, PA................ 36C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ......... 37. Wyoming Valley, PA ................. 38. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA ............ 39. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 40. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................ 41. Flood Control Work under special authorization .................... Water Supply 42. Washington Aqueduct ................. General Investigations 43. Surveys ........................... Page 4-17 44. 4-17 45. 4-18 4-18 46. 4-18 4-18 4-19 A _1 4-19 4-19 4-19 4-19 4-20 4-20 General Investigations (cont'd) Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... Continuation of Planning and Engineering .................... Advanced Engineering and Design....................... Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ........... Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects................ Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................ Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ............ Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .............. Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects .............. 4-2 Page 4-20 4-20 4-20 4-22 4-27 4-33 4-35 4-35 4-37 4-38 4-39 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Navigation 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 2.3 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.2 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 8.9 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 19.9 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 13.0 miles long from the Cutoff-Brewerton Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.4 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 mile; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.2 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,300 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $412,880,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $47,350,000 (October 1985 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $42,800,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,490,000 is non- Federal; and $357,200,000 (October 1985 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $400,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $356,800,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1983)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). 4-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Remaining work under the River and Harbor Act of 1958, deepening and widening the Connecting Channel (Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension), was reactivated May 15, 1985 and preconstruction planning was essentially completed during FY 1985 at a cost of $198,183. The District's Supplement to the General Design Memorandum which recommended deepening and widening of the Connecting Channel from 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1986. New work dredging of the Connecting Channel was included with the District's maintenance dredging contract awarded on June 12, 1986. Dredging of 4,000,000 cubic yards from the Connecting Channel at a cost of $8,552,550 commenced on August 22, 1986 and was approximately 50% complete as of September 30, 1986. Engineering and design of work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 continued in FY 1986 at a cost of $712,000. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Assistant Secretary of the Army and the State of Maryland was executed on June 17, 1986. Initiation of construction is pending enactment of a nationwide Federal Port use charge. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging of the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, Swan Point and Tolchester Channels, by contract, began on July 11, 1986 and was still in progress at the end of the fiscal year. An estimated 1,700,000 cubic yards of material was dredged and deposited in the Hart-Miller Island containment facility at a cost of $5,585,000 as of September 1986. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the York Spit and Rappahannock Shoal Channels were made. Maintenance dredging of the Cape Henry Channel, by government hopper dredge, began on March 1, 1986 and was completed on March 26, 1986. A total of 84,156 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the Dam Neck ocean disposal area at a cost of $950,000. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 22,680 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 miles south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance of Wells Cove section of the project. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the 7 marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 4. CLAIBORNE HARBOR, MD Location. The harbor is located on the eastern side of Eastern Bay, an arm of Chesapeake Bay, about 42 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1225.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 14 feet deep from the vicinity of the harbor wharves to deep water in Eastern Bay with widths of 100 feet at mean low water for a distance of 1,800 feet to the bend opposite the existing Black Beacon, thence widening in a distance of 260 feet to 150 feet to the 14-foot depth in Eastern Bay, with necessary widening at the bends. The total length of the channel is about 4,400 feet. The project also provides for a 250-foot extension of the jetty built by the railway company. Terminal facilities. There are two solid bulkhead wharves, with open pile piers at their outer ends, served by this improvement. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded for rehabilitation of 500 l.f. of revetment. 5. FISHING CREEK, MD Location. A narrow winding tidal stream which enters Chesapeake Bay from the west 56 miles south of Baltimore and about 26 miles south of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 and 60 feet from deep water in the Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in marsh 500 feet above mouth of creek, and twin stone jetties at entrance; north jetty is about 1,050 feet long, and south jetty about 1,100 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 1 foot. Cost of new work for the completed project was $111,242. SLocal cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Seven hundred feet of bulkhead wharf are available on the south side of the entrance channel running west from bay shore, and the U.S. Navy Department constructed a pile-and-timber wharf on west side of basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for rehabilitation of twin stone jetties was awarded on November 7, 1985. Work was completed on April 7, 1986. 6. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location. Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 7. HERRING CREEK, MD Location. Herring Creek in St. Marys County, MD., is a small tidal stream 134 miles in length which flows in a westerly direction and enters the north bank of the Potomac River 16 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 92 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 557.) Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 1,630 feet long extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water within the creek, a turning basin of irregular shape 6 feet deep adjacent to the proposed public wharf, and riprap-stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 1.9 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The project was modified in 1985 under Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. The modification consists of constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment and upgrading 350 linear feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront south of the project inlet to preclude shoreline erosion induced by the project jetties. Local cooperation: The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) includes the following provisions: 1. The Local Sponsor will assume full responsibility for initial project costs in excess of the $1,000,000 Federal Cost Limitation. 2. Compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970. 3. Provide without cost to the United States, when and as required all lands, easements, rights-of-way 4-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 and soil-disposal areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. 4. Hold and save the United States free from damages to other property resulting from the improvement. Terminal facilities: There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year: New work: A contract for construction of the project modification was awarded on May 15, 1986 to R&G Construction in the amount of $929,750. Construction is scheduled to be completed by June 1987. 8. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD Location. Island Creek in St. Marys County, MD., is a tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. Marys River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles downstream from Washington, DC. It lies entirely within the lower half of St. Georges Island. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Marys River through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. Costs of Federal new work for the completed project were $6,230. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five small private landings or stagings which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 9. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1223.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract for rehabilitation of the twin stone jetties was completed on February 5, 1986. 10. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. This is a tidal waterway, about 1.5 miles long and from one-eighth to one-half mile wide, branching off from Tangier Sound between Deal Island and Little Deal Island, MD. It is about 12 miles north of Crisfield Harbor, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. The original project was dated March 3, 1881. For further details see page 1790 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. The cost for new work for the completed project was $39,658, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are three packing-house wharves and a small marine railway above the head of the project channel at Wenona. The facilities are privately owned but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient areas are available for the construction of additional terminals when and as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract was awarded on May 14, 1986 to construct a stone jetty and breakwater. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on July 18, 1986 to remove approximately 42,000 cubic yards of material. 11. LOWES WHARF, MD Location. Lowes Wharf is in Ferry Cove, also known as Haddaway Cove, a small indentation on the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 6 miles north of the Choptank River and 13 miles west of Easton, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot depth 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT curve in Ferry Cove to and including a basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 300 feet long on the south side of Lowes Wharf. The mean tidal range is 1.4 feet; however, greater fluctuations frequently result from prolonged or high winds. The cost of new work for the completed project was $21,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Lowes Wharf, a solid-fill pier, with a seafood house located on the outer end, is the only terminal facility in Ferry Cove. The pier is public and is open to watermen at all times. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Modification was issued for maintenance dredging completed on March 19, 1984. 12. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction for the south jetty rehabilitation was completed in December 1985. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Isle of Wight Bay was completed in March 1986. A total of 70,000 cubic yards of material were removed. 13. PARISH CREEK, MD Location. A small branch of West River, an estuary of Chesapeake Bay on Maryland western shore, at Shadyside, MD., about 7 miles south of mouth of Severn River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, widened at ends, from deep water in West River to head of south fork of Parish Creek, and an anchorage basin at junction of north fork having a depth of 6 feet and an area not exceeding 1V2 acres. Mean tidal range is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $19,170 exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. Average annual maintenance cost for past 5 years was $6,000. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935. (See H. Doc. 185, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., which contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $1,000 toward cost of improvement, furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas, and provide a suitable water freight terminal at head of Parish Creek, open to all on equal terms. Total funds required to complete project were provided by Works Progress Administration. Local interests furnished disposal areas. Not fully complied with in that a public wharf has not been provided. Terminal facilities. There are numerous timber piers, one bulkhead wharf, two marine railways, 300 feet of concrete bulkhead and 350 feet of timber bulkhead on Parish Creek. Piers and bulkheads are privately owned, but open to the public for transaction of business with owners. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 14. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. 4-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 23 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 379,080 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 15. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Location: The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project: On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation: The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA which must be reexecuted annually expires on September 30, 1986 includes the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests. Terminal facilities: There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year: On July 9, 1986 a harvesting contract was awarded and approximately 36 acres of nuisance aquatic plants were mechanically harvested. 16. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintanance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There were 3 detailed investigations of sunken vessels/wrecks resulting in no declarations of "Hazards to Navigation" issued. 17. RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD Location. Rhodes Point and Tylerton are two settlements about 1.5 miles apart on Smith Island, between Chesapeake Bay and Tangier Sound, about 60 miles north of Virginia Capes and about 110 miles south of Baltimore. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Shanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and 400 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet. On January 22, 1982, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide a distance of about one mile from the anchorage basin at Rhodes Point through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1982. See section 19 of 1982 Annual Report for requirement details. Terminal facilities. There are numerous pile-and-timber wharves along waterfronts at Rhodes Point and Tylerton. Facilities are privately owned, but open to the public without charge when not in use by the owners, and are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient space for construction of additional facilities is available, if required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed in January 1986. A total of 30,000 cubic yards of material were removed. 18. ST. PATRICKS CREEK, MD Location. St. Patricks Creek in St. Marys County, MD is a small tidal stream 11/2 miles long which flows in a southeasterly direction and enters the west side of St. Clement Bay at its junction with the Potomac River. The creek is 33 miles upstream from the Chesapeake Bay and 83 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 558). Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 7 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 2,450 feet long 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT from deep water in St. Clement Bay to deep water within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: mean, 1.9 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $15,752, exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. The latest (1950) approved estimate for the annual cost of maintenance is $4,800. Local cooperation. The existing project was approved subject to the provisions that (a) local interests contribute $1,000 in cash toward the cost of new work; (b) hold and save the United States free from any damage resulting from construction and maintenance of the improvement; (c) furnish releases from damages to oyster grounds; (d) furnish free of cost to the United States suitable spoil-disposal areas for new work and subsequent maintenance, when and as required; and (e) agree to provide a suitable public wharf with access road open to all on equal terms. Items (a) through (d) have been fully complied with. Local interests have initiated action to complete item (e). Terminal facilities. There are 41 small wharves and stagings located in the creek. All are privately owned, but one is open to the public. There is also one marine railway in the creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 19. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Location. This is a waterway about 8 miles long and tidal throughout connecting with Little Choptank River 5 miles from its mouth. It lies in Dorchester County, MD, between Taylors Island and the mainland of the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. The mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and the extreme tidal range is 2.9 feet. The cost for new work, made in 1911, is $4,140. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one solid bulkhead wharf about 300 feet long, served by this improvement. It is privately owned but open to general public use, and is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 20. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Location. This stream, formerly called Treadhaven Creek, rises in Talbot County, MD, flows southerly and empties into Choptank River 10 miles above its mouth. It is about 10 miles long and is a tidal estuary with very little natural flow. Draining area is 36 square miles. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. For details see page 397 of Annual Report for 1951. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Tred Avon River from that depth in river near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, thence a channel of same depth and width and about 1,400 feet long in the North Fork, thence a channel of same width and 8 feet deep and about 700 feet long with a turning basin of same depth at upper end. Project also provides for a turning basin in South Fork 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long on east side of main channel at Easton Point. Section included in project is about 2 miles long, and its lower end is about 7.5 miles above mouth. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-11 of Fiscal Year 1979 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Five large terminals for receiving and distributing petroleum products, and a marina with stalls and ships, marine railway, a launching ramp, and a 6-ton travel-lift at Easton Point. These facilities are in good condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was completed in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Work was deferred because locals were unable to provide the required contributed funds. 21. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work Mr completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to 4-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed in January 1986. A total of 10,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 22. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. Natural waterway lying between Deal Island and mainland of Somerset County, MD., on eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 277 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Entrance channel from Tangier Sound 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, thence of irregular width to and along south shore of Thorofare, protected by two stone breakwaters at entrance, north breakwater is about 410 feet long and south breakwater about 310 feet long, with a turning basin at inner end 9 feet deep on south side of channel to within 50 feet of bulkhead along south shore, an anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending across waterway parallel to highway bridge to within 50 feet of bulkhead on south shore, and an anchorage area 650 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 9 feet deep on north side of channel between breakwater and 6-foot anchorage. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $62,116. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A small packing-house wharf on shore of Tangier Sound south of project channel: two small packing houses along approach channel at which seafood is landed; and a public wharf at turning basin with a suitable road connecting it with the road system. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded for removal of approximately 88,000 cubic yards of material. 23. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 24. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pileand- timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 25. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 26. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $1,431 for Hull Creek, VA; and $7,600 for Shallow Creek, MD. Beach Erosion Control 27. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Location. Colonial Beach, Westmoreland County, VA, is located on the right bank of the Potomac River 40 miles upstream from its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 69 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 558.) Existing project. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area downstream from Hawthorne Street southward to provide an additional beach area of about 107,200 square feet, stablizing with vegetation about 200 feet of the bank behind the beachfill and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each, to stablize the beachfill area; and extending and widening the existing beach at Castlewood Park to provide an additional beach area of about 59,300 square feet; constructing three segments of offshore breakwater with estimated lengths of 200 feet each for two of the segments and 300 feet for the third segment; removing debris in the beachfill area; and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of the Castlewood Park beachfill. The estimated cost of this work is $1,910,977 of which $1,000,000 is Federal cost and $910,977 is required local cash contribution. The $1,910,977 includes $992,000 for periodic beach nourishment as needed, after FY 1983. Local cooperation. Among other requirements, local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway and relocations required for construction including periodic nourishment and provide a cash contribution equal to 50 percent of the final project construction cost (excluding lands and relocations). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Surveys were accomplished in FY 1986 at a total cost of $1,530. 28. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $55,874 for town of North Beach, MD. Flood Control 29. BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (October 1986) of new work is $176,270,300 of which $58,521,700 is required non- Federal reimbursement. 4-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The project became operational for water supply, flood control, and for water quality control in July 1981. Miscellaneous costs for the fiscal year were $26,678. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 30. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. 31. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 31A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost-sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400 of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non- Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Damsite is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 33A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 33C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 4-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for correction of the underseepage at the First Ward Area, Front Street Levee were completed and the locals are acquiring the lands, easements and rights-of-way. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure con- 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT duit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operaton and maintenance of the project continued. 33H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on 4-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres,and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local Cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 35. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 35A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1986) of the modification is $53,114,000 of which $970,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $52,144,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $11,760,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $970,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued on the project modification. Costs for the fiscal year were $418,395. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tio- 4-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 ga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (October 1986) of new work is $193,120,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction, $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations and $7,500,000 is for construction of the Mill Creek recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required on the completed portion of the project; however, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities relies on local interests providing specialized facilities including buildings, lodges, demonstration centers, and non-water oriented equipment and accepting full responsibility for operation and maintenance of the entire recreation area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for the joint development of the Mill Creek Recreation Area continued by the Baltimore District and Mansfield University including initiation of plans and specifications for construction. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek) and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard) on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 36A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure,about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Recreation facilities include a seasonal recreational pool of 790 acres, access roads, parking areas, beach area, boat dock, and launching ramp. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 36C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities include a summer recreation pool of 1,730 acres, a conservation pool of 630 acres for the preservation of fish life, access roads, parking areas, boat docks and launching ramps, and camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 37. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Location. The project is located in Luzerne County, PA, on the Susquehanna River. The project area is limited to the four existing Federal flood control projects. These levee improvements are in Plymouth, Kingston- Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. Existing project. The four projects were constructed during the period 1935 through 1976 and consist of levee, sheet piling, flood wall, and associated interior drainage structures along both banks of the Susquehanna River which provide flood control benefits estimated at $46.1 million annually. Remedial measures to protect against levee failure under future high discharge conditions consist of: weighted filter drains on the landside of the levees to protect against erosion due to seepage in certain areas; stability berms and toe protection on the riverside of the levees in certain areas to stabilize the riverbank and protect against erosion due to river flows; stabilization of sheet piling in certain areas; and additional relief wells to control the underseepage in other areas. Local cooperation. Lands and relocations for construction of the existing projects at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 were provided by the Boroughs of Kingston, Edwardsville, Plymouth, the City of Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, and Luzerne County. These entities also operate and maintain the existing projects. Updated assurances were obtained during preparation of the General Design Memorandum. Additional local costs in connection with the proposed remedial work are expected to be minor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction continued for the filter drain work at Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, which is 99 percent complete and filter drain work at Kingston-Edwardsville and Swoyersville-Forty Fort is 75 percent complete. A contract for the Ross Street Sewer Modification was awarded on July 21, 1986 and is 5 percent complete. 38. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Pennsylvania-York and Hanover.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 40. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $29,586. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $47,412. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $514,050 of which $331,088 was for Disaster Preparedness Program, and $182,962 was for Rehabilitation and Emergency operations. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $94,938 for Conklin-Kirkwood NY. Non-structural study for Conklin-Broome (Ice Jam) NY; $290,289 for Hyndman, PA; $33,209 for Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA; and $13,362 for Hills Point Rd., MD. 4-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Water Supply 42. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The McMillan Water Treatment Plant Replacement work authorized with "no year" funds is 99 percent complete. A contract for the new Chlorine Bldg. at Dalecarlia was awarded July 31, 1984 and construction is complete and operational. Maintenance (operation): An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1986 was 74,122 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 253 million gallons and average daily consumption was 203 million gallons. The amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 40.6 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $4,765,183 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.I. 93-523.) General Investigations 43. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $530,840 of which $150,026 was for flood damage prevention studies, $109,231 for shoreline protection studies, $1,509 for special studies, $72,000 for special investigations, and $198,074 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $304,209. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 45. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, PA-The plan of improvement for the South Harrisburg area recommended in an interim report on the Susquehanna River Basin study includes a floodwall 3,800 feet long, a pump station and floodgates for interior drainage, a dry detention dam along Asylum Run (a small tributary of Paxton Creek), an enlarged earth and concrete channel for Paxton Creek about 4 miles long, and minor recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,900,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $363,317. Lock Haven, PA-The plan of improvement recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum includes 24,500 feet of levee, 6,500 feet of flood wall, eight closure structures, four pumping stations, diversion of Lusk Run, and minor recreation facilities. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,025,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $842,935. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The plan of improvement in the Phase I General Design Memorandum includes raising the existing levees and flood walls between 5 and 7 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new flood walls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising five other local protection projects, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of an existing project. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $5,700,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $732,177. Atlantic Coast of Maryland & Assateague Island, VA-The plan of improvement recommended in the survey report included widening and raising the existing beach about 7.6 miles, constructing a steel sheet pile bulkhead about 1.8 miles, and constructing a sand dune about 6.3 miles. The State of Maryland will now provide the expanded beach for recreation and the Corps will provide the bulkhead and dune for hurricane protection. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT was initiated during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $1,800,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $144,704. 46. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Francis E. Walter Dam, PA-(Modification)-The authorized project would provide for modifying the existing single purpose flood control project by raising the existing dam 30 feet thereby adding water supply and recreation purposes. Work continued on design memoranda for project features and plans and specifications were prepared for the operations building and dam grouting. The preconstruction planning cost is $5,688,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $1,354,692. Tamaqua, PA-The authorized project would provide for a 9-foot diameter diversion tunnel 2,930 feet long, that starts at Wabash Creek at the west boundary of Tamaqua and terminates at the Little Schuylkill River. The project also includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, a highway bridge, and a small dry detention reservoir on a tributary of Wabash Creek. Coordination with the local sponsor continued during the fiscal year. The preconstruction planning cost is $1,850,000 and total costs during the fiscal year were $6,733. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum was initiated furing the fiscal year and total costs were $137,489. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,000,000. 4-21 TABLE 4-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor MD Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Chester River, MD 4. Claiborne Harbor, MD 5. Fishing Creek, MD 6. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD 7. Herring Creek, MD 8. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD 9. Little Wicomico River, VA 10. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,300,000 770,000 455,000 5,904,000 52,755,7121 851,317 1,055,174 555,821 5,585,736 52,365,1501 5,769,0002 12,865,0004 15,637,0006 7,440,7918 73,417,65110 6,568,7553 13,035,8145 15,637,012' 7,440,790' 73,417,64610 177,000 186,916 5,000 5,000 202,000 202,323 205,000 201,424 228,000 227,999 95,129 95,127 318,636 333,032 80,450 80,450 19,310 19,310 236,000 239,574 25,000 25,000 68,000 68,000 432,750 432,748 20,000 20,000 503,200 478,502 3,287,210 3,287,207 70,495"1 70,495" 1,364,473 1,364,473 42,97412 42,97412 258,733 258,731 111,242 111,242 1,372,400 1,372,398 50,591 50,591 474,248 474,248 788,000 763,302 66,229 66,229 10,306 10,306 14,000 14,000 7,078 7,079 416,600 416,600 20,000 20,000 138,600 134,210 1,369,000 117,978 164,500 164,499 23,836 23,836 342,110 342,110 81,88513 81,885'13 1,387,653 1,383,261 1,413,65814 162,636' 4 505,442 505,441 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 11. Lowes Wharf, MD 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 13. Parish Creek, MD 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 15. Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC 16. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 17. Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD 18. St. Patricks Creek, MD 19. Slaughter Creek, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 182,000 48,900 30,000 151,790 1,343,000 935,000 251,452 2,106,987 781,000 709,961 1,000,000 1,750,000 1,050,000 - 2,734,267 1,056,190 - - 31,578 - - 31,578 486,000 493,074 40,929 -51,000 213,698 352,000 353,227 162,000 162,000 410,000 394,333 51,000 50,949 41,488 41,487 2,934 2,934 8,354 8,354 4-23 31,000 42,310 422,600 493,639 38,000 47,143 19,400 19,400 417,000 432,664 378,000 323,826 54,363 35,825 84,000 84,040 398,200 398,201 21,000 21,000 317,829 317,829 350,193's 350,1931 9,651,508 9,651,506 3,838,000 3,837,600 19,17016 19,17016 113,834 113,834 6,220,175 6,220,171 378,000 323,826 54,363 35,825 .4,456,040 4,456,029 304,000 304,000 711,194 711,194 5,000 5,000 15,752 15,752 46,602 46,602 4,140 4,140 448,030 448,030 5,000 5,000 15,000 15,000 40,000 40,000 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 20. Tred Avon, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. Twitch Cove & New Work Big Thorofare, Approp. MD Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22. Upper Thorofare, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23. Washington Harbor, New Work DC Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 24. Wicomico River, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 27. Colonial Beach, New Work VA Approp. Cost Contrib. Approp. Cost 29. Bloomington Lake, New Work MD & WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30. Cumberland, MD New Work and Ridgeley, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 31A. Aylesworth Creek New Work Lake, PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 32. Raystown Lake, New Work Raystown Branch, Approp. Juniata River, PA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17,000 17,000 36,000 36,000 27,569 27,569 10,000 10,000 - 19,000 440,826 824,730 547,075 -64,000 -7,138 -65,023 44,678 1,688,000 1,856,543 893,200 885,166 64,600 66,856 67,000 71,631 63,000 77,569 134,000 915,074 206,782 206,782 681,000 681,000 15,000 12,500 43,000 43,000 55,000 55,000 358,500 358,498 523,310 523,310 109,843 109,843 193,175 193,175 1,937,811 1,937,811 62,446 62,446 705,941 705,939 3,191,07717 3,191,07717 44,000 4,794,4961819 44,000 4,794,49618,19 49,000 49,001 1,530 471,60920 471,60920 5,962,737 5,962,736 519,00021 518,03021 414,977 414,977 -110,000 1,900,000 582,603 1,974,750 - 176,270,300 26,678 176,266,783 988,978 1,160,200 1,759,000 1,005,530 1,163,471 1,759,018 45,000 45,000 72,925 75,636 55,930 55,930 113,500 113,424 61,000 61,000 101,000 101,071 2,423,056 1,741,000 2,125,500 2,108,000 2,447,276 1,778,456 2,077,231 2,138,283 5,733,978 5,733,938 15,633,97022 15,633,97022 639,229 639,229 2,320,400 2,320,400 963,602 963,595 77,408,770 77,408,770 17,767,295 17,749,242 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 33A. Addison, NY 33B. Almond Lake, NY 33C. Arkport Dam, NY 33D. Avoca, NY 33E. Binghamton, NY 33F. Canisteo, NY 33G. Corning, NY 33H. East Sidney Lake, NY 331. Elmira, NY 33J. Hornell, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 827,050 827,050 12,900 12,879 221,000 230,101 180,800 178,847 15,900 16,788 34,300 34,283 38,100 40,321 24,800 27,126 347,500 359,826 22,800 26,264 348,200 257,415 16,049 16,124 160,772 164,920 78,363 87,246 18,300 18,300 28,300 28,398 25,800 25,802 25,600 25,600 300,118 302,918 20,400 20,400 85,051 176,056 17,200 17,200 379,500 379,362 130,700 130,621 23,526 23,525 18,000 18,000 53,474 53,472 53,900 53,900 262,100 262,095 25,900 25,900 106,170 106,168 14,100 14,091 234,000 234,127 148,000 148,073 24,300 24,300 383,000 40,480 35,200 35,200 25,900 25,874 38,500 38,500 330,000 329,995 28,300 28,297 135,900 135,901 178,155 178,146 5,760,211 5,760,211 3,022,840 3,022,826 1,910,00023 1,910,00023 1,591,174 1,591,165 436,37424 436,37424 380,661 380,660 3,335,00025 2,992,48025 413,781 413,781 1,183,11126 1,183,11126 618,135 618,107 3,322,00027 3,322,00027 641,558 641,558 6,049,504 6,049,504 3,447,319 3,447,303 6,883,305 6,883,305 264,549 264,546 4,558,69828 4,558,69828 2,990,133 2,990,130 4-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total to Sept. 30, 1986 33K. Lisle, NY 33L. Oxford, NY 33M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 33N. Whitney Point Village, NY 34. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 35A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 35B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 36A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 36B. Curwensville Lake, PA 36C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22,500 26,382 11,200 13,737 259,500 300,269 26,300 29,273 158,600 161,139 168,891 851,200 833,587 -220,000 79,419 1,269,200 1,331,830 488,800 413,472 360,500 361,923 412,000 412,339 25,400 25,453 15,900 15,900 265,843 266,070 33,200 33,253 201,340 201,680 670,000 722,340 743,904 754,305 -60,000 23,487 1,144,289 1,166,973 403,810 572,896 405,491 405,237 446,722 449,450 19,800 19,800 17,600 17,600 304,800 304,721 20,500 20,500 211,700 211,631 1,065,000 853,691 932,800 938,312 35,000 30,000 1,540,700 1,540,278 427,300 427,275 491,100 492,316 472,300 472,515 26,100 26,098 11,300 11,290 644,000 643,908 18,400 18,380 218,000 218,056 195,000 418,395 894,200 897,042 90,000 65,546 1,329,800 1,330,248 463,000 452,583 628,000 628,049 424,000 423,980 661,19929 661,19929 642,122 642,120 131,000 s0 131,0003o 200,732 200,722 5,421,539 5,421,539 4,095,140 4,094,961 424,096 424,096 323,661 323,641 5,725,700 5,725,700 2,060,209 2,060,190 107,960,700 107,957,868 4,669,354 4,668,706 18,744,800 18,715,346 8,454,654 8,454,585 7,103,001 7,103,001 4,130,622 4,120,171 20,396,060 20,396,060 5,989,389 5,989,360 30,887,06331 30,887,06331 4,906,084 4,906,055 4-26 See Section in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 aaa a vwv a s v vva a r aaaaa ab a a vva a vz a s vy a a v BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 37. Wyoming Valley, New Work PA Approp. 2,390,000 2,190,000 6,800,000 740,000 26,145,000 Cost 1,388,786 3,205,348 2,686,198 3,531,080 24,734,047 38. York, Indian New Work Rock Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 5,061,16732 Cost - - - - 5,061,16732 Maint. Approp. 294,800 373,344 534,000 548,000 4,867,21733 Cost 312,558 379,530 523,994 557,982 4,867,18533 Contributed Approp. - - 85,000 - 85,000 Cost - - - 81,849 81,849 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 16. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration 2. Includes $1,085,000 for sections of project in Norfolk funds. District. 17. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 3. Includes $1,891,518 for sections of project in Norfolk 18. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. District. 19. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provi- 4. Includes $40,000 for sections of project in Norfolk sions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. District. 20. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes 5. Includes $200,691 for sections of project in Norfolk $14,000 contributed funds. District. 21. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 6. Includes $88,000 for sections of project in Norfolk 22. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. District. 23. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 7. Includes $88,001 for sections of project in Norfolk 24. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. District. 25. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 8. Includes $967,791 for sections of project in Norfolk 26. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. District. 27. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 9. Includes $967,791 for sections of project in Norfolk 28. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes District. $15,000 contributed funds. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 29. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 11. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 30. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 12. Project deferred for restudy. 31. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance 13. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary sys- 14. Includes $5,000 for previous project. temrn for public use. 15. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 32. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 33. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor. 2 Jan. 21, Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Increased anchorage facilities. H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-27 1. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. CHESTER RIVER, MD. Mar. 3, A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester 1873 River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. Sep. 19, A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton 1980 to Jones Landing. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act of 1948 E. Doc. 25, 42d. Cong., 3d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st. Cong., 1st Sess. 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 1948 the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. CLAIBORNE HARBOR, MD Jun. 13, A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water to the railroad 1902 pier in the harbor, and thence shoreward along the south side of the pier with a width of 195 feet and a length of 500 feet. An extension of the present jetty. FISHING CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin stone jetties at the entrance. HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay 1930 to the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, 1938 the turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. HERRING CREEK, MD Jul. 3, Provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a 1950 turning basin of irregular shape and 6 feet deep, and riprap stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The project length is 1,630 feet. Mar. 7, 1986 Sec 111 Constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment, and upgrading 350 feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD (See Section 9 of Text) Mar. 2, A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island 1945 Creek with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in the creek. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water 1935 in Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. 10. Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 7, 1986 Sec 107 11. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, from Tangier Sound to the wharves at Wenona; widening the angles and the end to furnish anchorage basins. Modified to provide a channel 60 feet wide, 7 feet deep from Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. Constructing a stone breakwater within Lower Thorofare, and a stone jetty on Deal Island to reduce channel maintenance. LOWES WHARF, MD Sep. 3, A channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot 1954 depth curve in Ferry Cove to and including a basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 300 feet long on the south side of Lowes Wharf. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 19358 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. 4. 5. 6. 4-29 H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 81, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 241, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 159 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Detailed Project Report July 18, 1985 H. Doc. 99, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 76, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Detailed Project Report. Mar. 8, 1984 H. Doc. 90, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. 8. 9. 12. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 1935' west side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet 19455 above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. PARISH CREEK, MD Aug. 30, Provide a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, widened at its ends, from 1935 deep water in West River to the head of the south fork of Parish Creek, and an anchorage basin at the junction with the north fork of Parish Creek, having a depth of 6 feet and an area not exceeding 1.5 acres. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting 1986 to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, 1958 and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) 17. Jan. 22, 1982 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 1, 1968 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 RHODES POINT TO TYLERTON, MD A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide at mean low water from the northern limit of existing Rhodes Point to Tylerton Federal navigation channel, a distance of about one mile, through Sheep Pen Gut to deep water in the Chesapeake Bay. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 50 feet wide from Tylerton to Rhodes Point via Rhodes Point Gut. Modification providing for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Tyler Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 150 feet wide and 400 feet long at Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Shanks Creek to and including an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and 400 feet long at Rhodes Point; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in Big Thorofare River to Tylerton; channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from Rhodes Point to Tylerton. ST. PATRICKS CREEK, MD May 17, Entrance channel 7 feet deep, 60 feet wide and approximately 2,450 feet 1950 long from deep water in St. Clement Bay to deep water within the creek. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Jul 25, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the 1912 bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 185, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958 Detailed Project Report, June 1981 H. Doc. 51, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.1 Detailed Project Report, February 1968 H. Doc. 671, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 87, 62nd Cong., 1st Sess. 4-30 14. 15. 16. 18. 19. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. 24. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Jul. 25, Restore the channel, formerly dredged from Peach Blossom Creek to Easton 1912 Point, to 8 feet deep at mean low water, and 150 feet wide, widening out at the upper end. Mar. 2, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide up the North Fork, with a turning 1919 basin at the upper end. Oct. 27, A 12-foot channel from a point near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, 1965 thence 1,400 feet in North Fork and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long in the South Fork. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Jul. 25, A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big 1912 Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. Jul. 3, A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 25 feet wide from Twitch 1930 Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, MD. Aug. 30, A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove through Big 1935 Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, MD. Jun. 20, Present project dimensions of main channel with twin jetties at entrance. 1938 May 17, Anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long on west side 1950 of project channel at Ewell, MD, and an extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Aug. 30, A 9-foot channel 75 feet wide protected by breakwater at entrance, with 1935 turning basin at inner end and anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Aug. 26, Widen entrance channel to 100 feet, extend 9-foot turning basin and 6-foot 1937 anchorage, and dredging an additional anchorage area on north side of channel. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 4-31 21. H. Doc. 399, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 26, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 225, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 313, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 67, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 340, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 76, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947, H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. 22. 23. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south 1937 prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet 1954 deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. COLONIAL BEACH, VA Sep. 15, Extending and widening the existing Central Beach area, stabilizing the 1980 bank behind the beachfill with vegetation, and constructing four segments of offshore breakwater; and extending and widening of the existing Castle Beach area, constructing three segments of offshore breakwater, removing debris in the beachfill area, and constructing a 100-foot long terminal groin at the southern end of Castlewood Park beachfill. Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 BLOOMINGTON LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Detailed Project Report, May 1980 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local pro- 1962 tection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. Oct.23, 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by 1983 Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-32 27. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 36. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 1954 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 37. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Jun. 22, Construction of a levee and flood wall protection system with associated H. Doc. 308, 1936 interior drainage facilities at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville- 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. 38. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus H. Doc. 702, 1936 Creek. 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive por- authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by tion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing Ocean City. a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above upper end. mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 3. Included in Public Works Administration program 1956. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost to September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Anacostia River and Flats 2 Annapolis Harbor, MD Aquia Creek, VA Back Creek, MD Betterton Harbor, MD Black Walnut Harbor, MD Bonum Creek, VA' Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Breton Bay, MD7 Broad Creek River, DE Broad Creek, MD Cambridge Harbor, MD7 Choptank River, MD" Corsica River, MD Crisfield Harbor, MD Cypress Creek, MD Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed 1878 1953 1946 1928 1946 1960 1982 1982 1950 1950 1964 1962 1984 1979 1948 1980 1947 $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,2503 52,4654 23,061 3,482 32,631 202,0006 15,755 47,9248 64,5109 28,227 195,97410 96,796 39,07112 349,15413 3,057 15,623 11,770 23,072 412,349 144,576 17,675 12,621 114,373 81,219 678,258 94,095 80,285 551,62314 10,528 4-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 293,964 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD'5 Completed 1932 90,12116 53,80817 Fishing Bay, MD Completed 1985 33,874 705,652 Goose Creek, MD5 Completed 1973 75,900 8,312 Honga River and Tar Bay (Barren Island Gaps), MD Completed 1985 66,11918 2,998,926 Island Creek, MD Completed 1948 6,230 54,828 Knapps Narrows, MD Completed 1985 46,12119 553,075 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,064 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,00020 7,327 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 16,485 Madison Bay, MD5 Completed 1977 125,550 20,854 Manokin River, MD2 1 Completed 1919 34,78822 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71523 23,173 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1982 12,460 207,685 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD5 Completed 1984 64,001 388,928 Nan Cove, MD5 Completed 1965 34,86124 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD'5 Completed 1983 240,817 131,878 Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD Completed 1984 143,13425 584,777 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1971 73,243 76,89526 Neabsco Creek, MD Inactive 1978 14,600 - Neale Sound, MD Completed 1982 12,60027 289,770 Neavitt Harbor, MD5 Completed 1968 36,500 28,084 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA28 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Northeast River, MD Completed 1984 28,48929 905,044 Occoquan Creek, VA15 Completed 1971 66,25330 176,920 Patuxent River, MD 15 Completed 1905 14,000' - Pocomoke River, MD Inactive 1985 191,72632 1,537,535 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Completed 1965 95,214 506,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA'5 Completed 1984 $ 17,000 306,574 Potomac River below Washington, DC Completed 1984 153,836 1,876,673 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,69293 27,46126 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85894 321,803 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,50096 77,113 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53136 6,719 St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1981 29,94797 271,618 St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 132,850 - St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1982 44,35738 400,243 St. Michaels Harbor, MD 5 Completed 1964 16,723"7 7,742 St. Peters Creek, MD5 Completed 1963 46,740"9 17,084 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 8,551 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57040 929,018 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA5 Completed 1974 57,0314' 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1983 424,80042 378,783 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 29,368 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,297** 45,295 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,041" 145,911 4-34 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 7. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 8. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 9. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 10. Includes $61,321 for previous project. 11. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 12. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 13. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 14. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 15. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 16. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 17. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 18. Excludes $2,200 contributed includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 19. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 20. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 21. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 22. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 23. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $54,000 from contributed funds. 24. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 25. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 26. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 27. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 28. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 29. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 30. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 31. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 32. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 33. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 34. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 35. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 36. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 38. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 39. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 40. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previos project. 41. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 42. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 43. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 44. Includes $6,000 for previous project. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD' Completed 1978 $ 97,7502 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E Cost to September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD 2 Bainbridge, NY' 4 Completed Completed Completed 1980 1977 1959 $ 6,042,325 1,000,0003 382,000 $1,417,655 4-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Bath, NY5 Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV4 Completed 1965 55,2186 - Black Walnut Point, MD Completed 1985 200,500 - Bridgewater, VA4 Completed 1953 136,500 - Bull Run, PA Completed 1984 2,742,000 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY4 Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY' Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5348 - Forest Heights, MD4 Completed 1964 430,0009 - Fourmile Run, VA Completed 1984 51,780,000 - Greene, NY4 Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,3941� - Kitzmiller, MD4 Completed 1965 501,50011 - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - Lock Haven, PA' 2 Active 1980 450,000" - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY4 Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY5 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,689" - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,939" 33,999 Scranton, PA'6 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,000 7 - Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tyrone, PA' 8 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,00019 - Upper Marlboro, MD4 Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA20 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92721 - Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45722 - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,8932s - 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 7. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 10. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 11. Authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 12. Excludes $481,000 for Phase I funded under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 13. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 14. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 15. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 16. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 17. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 18. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 19. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 20. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 22. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY1' 2 Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD' Davenport Center Lake, NY 2 Fall Brook Lake, PA5 Genegantslet Lake, NY 1970 1949 1949 1940 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 1971 Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Saint Georges Creek, MD May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-37 $ 24,622$ 212 112 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 7,9283 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA6 1974 Dec. 29, 1981 $ -- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act South Plymouth Lake, NY 1953 May 6, 1981 100,0363 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Waterway from Little Choptank River to 1939 Aug. 5, 1977 305- Choptank River, MD 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act West Oneonta Lake, NY 2 1970 May 6, 1981 189,100- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. expired May 26, 1953. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of ad- 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. vanced engineering and design. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Crisfield Harbor April 1986 Island Creek May 1986 Muddy Hook & Tyler Cove August 1986 Smith Creek October 1985 St. Catherines Sound May 1986 St. Jerome Creek November 1985 Town Creek October 1985 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Date Inspected DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge Bath Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Oneonta Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville Loyalsock Milton Plymouth Scranton Sunbury Swoyersville-Forty Fort Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. Williamsport S. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley September 1986 September 1986 November 1985 September 1986 November 1985 September 1986 September 1986 November 1985 October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October October 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 October 1985 September 1986 October 1985 September 1986 September 1986 October 1985 September 1986 September 1986 October 1985 September 1986 October 1985 October 1985 September 1986 September 1986 September 1986 September 1986 4-39 Project a NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * Thfs district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, Virginia, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, Virginia. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION PAGE 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL........................................5-2 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) .................................. 5-2 3. Broad Creek, VA ..................................................... 5-3 4. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA ............................ 5-3 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA.........................................5-4 6. Cranes Creek, VA ................................................... 5-4 7. Greenvale Creek, VA ........................................... 5-4 8. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA Collection and Removal of D rift ...................................................................... 5-4 9. Jam es River, VA ..................................................... 5-5 10. Little Machipongo River, VA...............................5-5 11. Norfolk Harbor, VA .............................................. 5-6 12. Nottaway River, VA..............................................5-7 13. Parker Creek, VA ................................................... 5-7 14. Quinby Creek, VA ................................................. 5-7 15. Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive & Injurios D eposits) .................................................... 5-8 16. Tangier Channel, VA............................................5-8 17. Waterway on the Coast of VA.............................5-8 18. York River, VA...................................................5-9 19. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.................................... ..... 5-9 BEACH EROSION CONTROL 20. Virginia Beach, VA...............................................5-9 21. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization................................5-9 FLOOD CONTROL PAGE 22. Gathright Dam and Lake M oom aw, VA ............................................... 5-10 23. Richm ond, VA ...................................................... 5-10 24. Saxis Island, V A ................................................... 5-11 25. Scottsville, V A ...................................................... 5-12 26. Virginia Beach Canal N um ber 2, V A ....................................................... 5-12 27. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization...............................5-12 28. Emergency Flood Control A ctivities ................................................................ 5-12 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 29. Surveys .................................................................. 5-12 30. Collection and Study of B asic D ata ............................................................. 5-13 31. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ................................................... 5-13 TABLES Table 5-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... 5-14 Table 5-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 5-18 Table 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks ................. 5-21 Table 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects..........................5-22 Table 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................. 5-23 Table 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 5-23 Table 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................... 5-24 5-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 19886 Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA, 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Survey. Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection to canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on a 5-year maintenance and repair contract is progressing satisfactorly. Work is continuing on the spare lock gates located at Great Bridge, VA. Contract was awarded Feb. '83 at $4,117,981. Maintenance dredging the lower North Landing River was accomplished Jan. 9-24, 1986. There were 58,420 cubic yards of material removed at a direct cost of $298,490. Other work performed included ordinary operation and maintenance of locks, dams and service facilities, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 2A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. A t mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12221). 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed by Hopper Dredge McFarland during Mar. 1-26, 1986. There were 75,036 cubic yards of credited material removed at a total direct cost of $900,550. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 3. BROAD CREEK, VA Location. Broad Creek is a small tidal estuary in Middlesex County, VA, 1 mile long, flowing in a northerly direction into the Rappahannock River, which it enters on the right bank about 1 mile upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay. The creek is 61 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12235). Existing project. This provides for a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 4,100 feet long from deep water in the Rappahannock River to deep water in Broad Creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.2 feet; irregular, 2 feet; and extreme, approximately 7.5 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $27,888. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 381, 76th Cong., 1st sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests shall furnish, free of cost to the United States, suitable spoil-disposal areas when and as required for subsequent maintenance, and hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from dredging. Terminal facilities. There are privately owned wharves and landings on the creek, many of which are open to the public by special arrangements. There is one marine railway on the creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed to remove material that had flowed out of the disposal area into Big Lake. Work was accomplished by contract at a total cost of $36,500. 4. CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA Location. Town of Cape Charles, VA is on Chesapeake Bay on west side of peninsula separating the bay from Atlantic Ocean. It is about 11 miles north of southern extremity of peninsula and 45 miles south of Maryland-Virginia State line. Cape Charles City Harbor is an artificial landlocked harbor on south side of the town. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12222). Existing project. A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay through Cherrystone Bar and inlet to the entrance to Cape Charles City Harbor, a distance of2.71 miles; a basin in the harbor of the same depth 400 to 800 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; a channel 10 feet deep, 100 to 180 feet wide and 260 feet long connecting a basin of same depth 180 feet wide and 420 feet long at head of Mud Creek and a harbor of refuge on the north side of Mud Creek, 7 feet deep, 200 to 250 feet wide, and 375 feet long connected to Mud Creek with an entrance channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Project also provides for protective works in form of a stone jetty on north side of harbor entrance and sand mole 1,350 feet long south of harbor entrance. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet with extremes of 2.5 feet below and 8 feet above mean low water. Cost for new work for completed project was $628,644, including $6,000 from contributed funds. Widening the basin an additional 200 feet is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $207,000. Local Cooperation. Conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1938 were fully complied with and approved by Chief of Engineers on March 30,1940. The River and Harbor Act of 1945, in adopting existing project dimensions, imposed conditions that local interests provide all lands for initial construction and future maintenance; provide and maintain substantial bulkheads and other terminal facilities adequate to permit full utilization of improvement; and reserve at least 1,000 linear feet of berthinig space along such bulkheads for general public use on equal and reasonable terms; and agree to hold the United States free from damages. Local interests furnished all lands necessary for dredging harbor to 800-foot width. Items of local cooperation in connection with Harbor of refuge have been complied with. Terminal facilities. The Pennsylvania Railroad owns a wooden zkr 200 feet long and two transfer ships in the outer harbor. On the south side of the harbor, Bay Shore Concrete owns an 800-foot bulkhead. A bulkhead providing 200 feet of berthing space is on the south side of the main harbor and is owned by a fish plant. There are about 1400 feet of 5-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 city-owned bulkhead open to the public. The Coast Guard owns a 100-foot pier on Mud Creek. The harbor of refuge should accomodate about 50 boats when berthing facilities are completed. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work performed consisted of condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and inspections, budgeting and scheduling and work on a long term disposal study. 5. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12211). Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work performed consisted of condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling, and engineering and design. 6. CRANES CREEK, VA Location. Cranes Creek in Northumberland County, Virginia is a small tidal estuary approximately 2 miles long and entering the right bank of the Great Wicomico River 2-1/2 miles upstream to the Chesapeake Bay. The creek is about 76 miles northerly from Norfolk, Virginia. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 12235) Existing project. This provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,500 feet long from deepwater in the Great Wicomico River to deepwater within Cranes Creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are mean 1.1 feet, irregular 2.0 feet, and extremes approximately 7.2 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The existing project was approved subject to the conditions that local interest construct and maintain a public wharf with improved approach road, furnish spoil disposal areas for initial dredging, and subsequent maintenance when and as required and hold and save United States free from claims for damages resulting from the improvement. All conditions have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are several small privately owned wharfs and landing on the creek which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed between Oct. 6 - Nov. 12, 1985, removing 17,000 cubic yards of material. In addition, dredging was performed between Mar. 10- Apr. 26, 1986 with 23,775 cubic yards of material being removed. Total direct cost amounted to $119,747. Other operations performed included quantity surveys, engineering and design, and supervision and inspections. 7. GREENVALE CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary that enters the north side of Rappahannock River about 20 miles above its mouth. It is wholly in Lancaster County, Virginia about 60 miles north of Norfolk, Virginia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12237). Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Rappahannock River about 950 feet to the mouth of Greenvale Creek, then 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the mouth into the creek for about 2,400 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 215 of Annual Report, 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging the mouth of the Creek was performed, by contract, at a cost of $29,216. There were 3,000 cubic yards of material removed. 8. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBOR OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with it Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Charts No. 12248, 12245 and 12253) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of 65,450 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 9. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Charts No. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long along side the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section, Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. The estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 have not been complied with. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharves, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed on the Shoals of Hopewell, Richmond Harbor and the Richmond I)eepwater Terminal. Dredging, by contract, was accomplished Jun. 20 - Sept. 3, 1986. A total of 276,612 cubic yards of material were removed for a total direct cost of $1,859,345. Other work performed included condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 10. LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA Location. This river, locally known as Parting Creek, has its source in the marsh of Bell Neck, Northampton County Va., flows in a southerly and easterly direction about 5 miles, and empties into Great Machipongo River, about 12 miles by water from Great Machipongo inlet, and about 28 miles by water from Cape Charles, Va. The drainage area is about 11 square miles. No information is available as to the discharge of this stream. The length of the tidal reach is about 2 miles. The Great Machipongo Inlet and the Great Machipongo River are the waterways connecting with the Atlantic Ocean, and have a controlling depth of 16 feet. Willis Wharf, a town with a population of about 500, is located on the west bank about 1 mile above its junction with the Great Machipongo River. The high-water width varies from about 450 feet at the mouth to 350 feet at Willis Wharf. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1221.) Existing project. This project provides for a channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 80 feet wide from the town of Willis Wharf to deep water in the river below. The mean xange of tide is about 0.7 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities. At the town of Willis Wharf, there are three wharves with a total wharfage space of about 300 feet, five bulkheads with a total wharfage space of about 1,140 feet, and two marine railways which will accommo- 5-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 date vessels up to 50 feet in length. All facilities are privately owned, being used for packing seafoods and servicing fishing vessels. The wharves have no railroad connections, but are served by local roads connecting with the country and State highway system. The facilities are considered' adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging, scheduled to be performed this fiscal year, was rescheduled for Fiscal Year 1987 due to prolonged disposal area issues. $45,920 was paid to landowners to acquire property for the disposal area. Engineering and design is still in progress. 11. NORFOLK HARBOR, VA Location. Norfolk, Virginia is 187 miles south of Baltimore, Maryland and 30m iles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 45-foot contour at Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge over Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Existing projects. A main channel 45 feet deep, 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads near Fort Wool to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Piers; at the same depth 800 feet wide to mouth of Southern Branch of Elizabeth River; and 450 fet wide up this branch to the Belt Line Railroad bridge, including an approach in turning area to same depth and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard, extending downstream 3,250 feet from Belt Line Railroad bridge 40 feet deep, 375 feet wide and 1 mile long to Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); 35 feet deep, 250 feet wide and 3.1 miles long to a point 1,900 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway (Gilmerton's Bridge); 35 feet deep, 250 -feet to 500 feet wide to a point 1.6 miles above Interstate 64 high level bridge. A turning basin at the mouth of St. Julian's Creek, 35 feet deep and 400-600 feet square, and a turning basin at the mouth of Main's Creek 35 feet deep and 600 feet square, the upstream end of the project. A channel in Eastern'Branch, 25 feet deep, 500f eet wide and 1.09 miles long from 40-foot channel to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge; 25 feet deep, 300 feet wide, 0.55 mile long to Campostella Bridge; 25 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 1.2 mile to Norfolk and Western Railway bridge (formerly Virginia Railway bridge); and for maintenance at a depth of 25 feet of existing turning basin and 5.5 acres in extent at head of existing project just below the Norfolk and Western (formerly Virginian) Railway bridge; a channel in Western Branch, 40 foot channel in Elizabeth River, 24 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.78 mile long; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for 0.37 mile to West Norfolk Highway bridge; 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide, 0.57 mile long. A channel in Scotts Creek between 40-foot channel at mouth and a point 100 feet above former location of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad bridge (about 0.73 miles upstream), 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Anchorage areas on west side of 40-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point and south of Craney Island aggregating 173 acres, consisting of 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep; 1 anchorage space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep; and 1 anchorage 1,000 feet wide, 3,000 feet long and 20 feet deep. Another anchorage of 45 acres and 12 feet deep near Pinner Point. Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep over a swinging radius of 1,200 feet and a trapezoidal shaped disposal area of about 2,500 acres of flats adjacent to the north of Craney Island,enclosed by stonefaced levees, 3 sluiceways in west levee, and an access road. Facilities for unloading of hopper dredged material consisting of mooring dolphins; a mooring barge anchorage 100 by 600 feet, 21 feet deep, with approach channel 300 to 3,600 feet; 30-feet deep connecting anchorage with Norfolk Harbor 45-foot channel; and a 28-inch discharge pipe line to the leveed area. Facilities for contract rehandling of bucket dredged material consisting of a rehandling basin 1,000 by 1,200 feet, 40 feet deep, protected by a spur levee extending 2,350 feet from main levee and provided with approach exit channels, 200 feet wide by 18 feet deep to Norfolk Harbor 45 foot channel and a pipe line trestle from rehandling basin to leveed area. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.7 feet, and extreme is 3.4 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations, due to combined effect of tides and winds referred to mean low water on -3.5 feet and +9.6 feet. Eastern Branch, 30-foot channel portion is considered inactive. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Latest published description of terminal facilities is in Port Series No. 11 (revised 1971, part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for River and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Planning and engineering for the deepening of Norfolk Harbor and Channels, initiated in prior years with General Investigations Appropriations, continued with Construction General Appropriations with a total project cost of $273,772. Completion of the 55-foot Channel and Anchorage General Design Memorandum amounted to $28,287, Long-Term Disposal Investigations amounted to $122,770, preliminary work on the 40-45 foot improvements amounted to $26,069, and $96,646 was expended for tcontract plans and specifications for the 50 foot Outbound Channels, the first construction element. Work was accomplished by contract and government plant and hired labor. Maintenance: Dredging 6 separate reaches was performed Jul. 22 - Aug. 30, 1986. A total of 280,202 cubic yards of material were removed at a total direct cost of $2,119,860. Operation and maintenance of the Craney Island project consisted of operation and maintenance of roads, service facilities, rental equipment, and 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT government plant. In addition, condition surveys, engineering and design and supervision and inspection was performed at a total cost of $1,567,110. Operation and maintenance of the Norfolk Harbor portion continued this fiscal year at a cost of $2,300,806. Condition and quantity surveys, budgeting and scheduling, engineering and design and supervision and inspection was performed using government plant and hired labor. Work progressed on the Craney Island Management Plant at a total cost of $692,802. 12. NOTTOWAY RIVER, VA Location. The study section of the Nottoway River, a major tributary of the Chowan River, is located in Southampton County in southeastern Virginia. (See Courtland and Sebrell, Virginia quadrangles of geological survey). Previous projects. None. Existing project. Channel width of 15 feet from the public boat ramp located 700 feet above Route 653 (Carey's Bridge) downstream to open water just below the seaboard Coast Line Railway Bridge. Under normal river conditions, the water depths are adequate for the recreational craft using the river. Therefore, dredging is not a part of this project. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details, see Annual Report for fiscal year 1979. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging and clearing was performed using government plant and hired labor. 13. PARKER CREEK, VA Location. Parker Creek empties into the western side of Metomkin Bay in Accomack County, Virginia. It is on the ocean side of Virginia's Eastern shore, about 20 miles south of Maryland-Virginia State line. Existing project. The existing project, authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, provides for establishment and maintenance of a channel 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep at mean low water from the same depth in Metomkin Bay into the mouth of the creek, a distance of about 2,200 feet or .5 mile. The existing project was completed in 1964 at a cost of $15,530 to the Federal Government and $1,350 to local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Non- Federal contributions amounted to $1,350. Terminal facilities. There are 9 small privately owned boat landings and two small public landings on the creek. Local interests have also constructed a 50-foot public dock with adequate shore facilities. These facilities are deemed adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed between Sept. 30 - Oct. 5, 1986. There were 37,185 cubic yards of material removed at a total direct cost of $9,482. Other operations performed included quantity surveys, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 14. QUINBY CREEK, VA Location. A natural channel on the Atlantic Ocean side of Delmarva Peninsula about 32 miles north of Cape Charles; and about 33 miles south of Chincoteague, VA. Creek extends in a generally southeasterly direction between Quinby Landing at Quinby, VA and head of Tony Rock Drain, in Upshur Bay, a distance of 6,900 feet (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12210). Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep in Upshur Bay to a point 600 feet bayward from Quinby Landing, thence 60 feet wide to Quinby Landing, a total distance of about 6,900 feet and a turning and mooring basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 400 feet long opposite public terminal and landing. Mean range of tide is 4.4 feet. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1950. (H. Doc. 241, 81st. cong., 1st sess. which contains latest published map). Project is complete, for details see Annual Report for 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for initial construction. Local interests must provide spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are two open-pile wooden wharves and about 125 feet of wooden bulkhead at Quinby, Va., which are privately owned. In addition, a number of berthing spaces, a wooden dock and launching ramp were constructed which are open to all on equal terms. These facilities are connected to the State Highway system by a suitable access road and are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished. 5-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 15. SUPERVISION OF HARBOR OF HAMPTON ROADS (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and trubitary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the state of Virginia and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The Riverand Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the I)eepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. DI)irect supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, debris removal, investigation and removal of sunken or abandoned vessels and navigational hazards, and support for Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corp's regulatory program, using also three small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land, and occasional chartered aerial recon naissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted dredging, and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 16. TANGIER CHANNEL, VA Location. A tidal channel about 2 miles long extending from Tangier Island, Virginia, northeasterly to deepwater in Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay and northwesterly to deepwater on Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from 8-foot contour to Tangier Sound to day marker No. 4, and thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the town of Tangier, with an anchorage basin adjacent of town 400 feet square and 7 feet deep. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide for about 4,000 feet from the anchorage basin northwesterly across Tangier Island to Chesapeake Bay. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet and extreme tidal range 4.7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Accomack County constructed a public dock in 1961. There are four privately owned docks adjacent to existing project and two marine railways. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation, condition surveys and scheduling were performed. 17. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VA Location. Between barrier beach along the Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, throughfares, and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No.'s 12211, 12210, 12221). Existing project. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorizes relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished at Gull marsh, Sloop Channel, and the North Channel between Dec. 31, 1985 - Mar. 2, 1986. A total of 282,531 cubic yards of material were removed at total direct cost of $593,709. In addition, 306,285 cubic yards of dredged material were removed from Metompkin Bay at a total direct cost of $85,709. Other operations performed included condition studies and surveys, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 18. YORK RIVER, VA Location. This river is formed at West Point, VA, by the confluence of the Mattaponi and Pamunkey Rivers, and flows southeasterly about 41 miles into Chesapeake Bay, which it enters about 20 miles in a northerly direction from Norfolk, VA, and 20 miles in a northwesterly direction from the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Survey Chart Nos. 494 and 495.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 22 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide through the bars, and a basin of the same depth at the wharves at West Point, and the construction of a dike on the right bank at West Point to assist in maintaining the channel. The plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: Mean 2.2 feet at mouth and 2.9 feet at West Point; and the extreme 3.9 feet at mouth and at West Point; irregular 6 feet at West Point. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of June 14, 1880 (Annual Report for 1880, p. 897). It was modified in 1884 and 1887. The latest published map is in the Annual Report for 1894, p. 964. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves on the York River of open-pile construction. The facilities are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operations, to include condition surveys and budgeting and scheduling, were accomplished. 19. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION STUDY/ PROJECT FY 1986 EXPENDITURES STATUS Study/ Pr*-4 -+ r AV PCJ; u. I a _ .7 iili FY 1986 Frnynditum.. aia Hunting/Guilford Creeks, 28,471 RECON in Accomack County, VA progress. Scotts Creek, VA 18,536 RECON in progress. Jordan Bridge Park Channel, 10,434 DPS determined Chesapeake, VA negative. Kings Creek, Northampton 7,912 DPS determined County, VA negative. Nansemond River, Constance 7,500 DPS determined Wharf, VA negative. Little Machipongo River, 2,424 DPS completed. Northampton County, VA Rudee Inlet, VA 29,482 P&S in progress. Finney Creek, 20,861 P&S in progress. Wachapreague, VA AR Appraisal Report RECON Reconnaissance Study DPS Detailed Project Study P&S Plans and Specifications Beach Erosion Control 20. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia-North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to insure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned 5-9 .I. I Meachim's Creek, Middlesex 4,600 AR in progress. County, VA REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1986) is $5,500,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,500,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification provides for structural and nonstructural improvements. Structural measures would be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th street. This would include raising the beach to elevation 10 feet and a width of 100 feet, driving a sheet pile wall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 57th Street; and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 57th to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1986)of the structural improvements are Federal $28,900,000 and non-Federal $12,800,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of FY 81 Annual Report. Necessary changes in requirements will be made if the 1974 modification is constructed. Operations during fiscal year. There were 150,000 cubic yards of material deposited on the project beach. Local interests were reimbursed $333,094 for the Federal share of costs incurred in Fiscal Year 1985. 21. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None this fiscal year. Flood Control 22. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Site of proposed Gathright Dam is on Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.3 and Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in reach of Jackson River known as the Gorge. About 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA at the elevation at the top of the conservation pool. Gathright Reservoir will ectend upstream about 9 miles (see Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long rolled rock fill dam with an impervious core, with a top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at fortney Branch, about 2.5 miles south ofthe dam. Discharges through the macimum conservation pool elavation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Last approved estimated Federal cost (1979) is $83,000,000. (See table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations performed this fiscal year consisted of care of service and receational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. Work was performed using government plant and hired labor. Additionaly, the following work was performed by contract: Installation of intake tower elevator, steam gage activities, and painting of the Intake Tower Bridge. 23. RICHMOND, VA Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the industrialcommercial complex on the south bank. Previous project. None. Existing project. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area, which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in House Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $77,500,000 based on October 1985 price levels which does not include inflation during term of construction. Local cooperation. The City of Richmond would provide the following: 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT a. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for excavated materiats as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project. b. Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, cemeteries, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction, excluding railroad bridges and approaches and facilities necessary for the normal interception and disposal of local interior drainage at the line of protection. c. Share in paying the total project construction costs on the following bases: (1) If the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and maintenance as specified in subparagraphs a and b above is equal to or greater than 20 percent of total project construction costs contribute the value of these items plus a cash payment equal to 5 percent of the total project construction costs during the period of construction; (2) If the value of the lands, easements, rights-ofway, and relocations required for project construction and maintenance as specified in subparagraphs a through c above is less than 20 percent of total project constructions costs, contribute 25 percent of said costs including not less than 5 percent in cash during the period of construction. d. Hold and save. the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; e. Maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; f. Prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment of ponding areas and rights-of-way necessary for the proper functioning and maintaining of the project; and g. Publicize floodplain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the floodplain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels, including ponding areas, provided by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design initiated in prior years with General Investigations Appropriations, continued with Construction General Appropriations with a total project cost of $591,086. At yearend a draft General Design Memorandum was under preparation. 24. SAXIS ISLAND, VA Location. Located adjacent to the town of Saxis, VA, in Accomack County. This Eastern Shore island is apporoximately 80 miles north of Norfolk, VA, and 100 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. Previous project. None. Existing project. Shoreline erosion threatens a public landing owned by Accomack County and located at the southern end of Saxis Island. The threatened public landing is currently protected by a timber bulkhead which is in danger of immediate failure due to erosion. Consideration was given to a catilever steel sheet pile wall and an anchored timber system. However, the recommended plan provides for construction of an anchored timber bulkhead along the northern and western portions of the landing. Local cooperation. The County ofAccomack, Va shall, in consideration of the Government commencing construction of such project, fulfill the requirements of non-Federal cooperation specified in such legislation, to wit: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, including all necessary relocations and alterations to utilities and other structures or improvements that may be required; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the united States or its contractors; (c) Maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (d) Assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. 5-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 (e) The County in acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for project construction, operation and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971); and (f) The County will comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) to wit: That no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with project on the grounds of race, color or national origin. Operations during fiscal year. Design and cost estimates and real estate studies were conducted during the year. $20,000 was allotted at the end of the Fiscal Year to initiate construction. 25. SCOTTSVILLE, VA Location. The town of Scottsville, VA is located in Albemarle and Fluvanna Counties, on the north bank of the James River, 185 miles above its mouth. Previous project. None. Existing project. The town encompasses 130 acres and the 1980 population was 250. It includes small commercial establishments and dwellings including many of historical value. A relatively large tire manufacturing plant is located adjacent to the town in Albemarle County and is the largest employer in the area with about 270 employees. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of FY 85 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction, initiated in FY 1985, is continuing with repair work to the existing project. Other vwork performed this FY consisted of engineering and design and supervision and inspection. Total contractor's earnings this year amounted to $631,285. 26. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15 feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a north-south alignment. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12205.) Existing project. The project will provide for construction of a new canal for a length of 2.6 miles and channelization of an existing canal fro a lenght of 1.1 miles. The canal botom width will range from 45 feet to 80 feet and a depth from -4feet mean sea level to -8 feet mean sea level with a flow capacity great enough to carry a 100 year flood. Its construction will require dredging 741,000 cubic yards of material. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-14 of FY 81 Annual Report. Requirements may change if legislation is enacted regarding new cost-sharing proposals. Operations during fiscal year. Funds, in the amount of $400,000, were received this FY to initiate construction. Award of the contract was delayed at yearend while local cooperation items were provided. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District was reimbursed for an unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report prepared on South River, Vesuvius, VA. Total cost amounted to $7,500. 28. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 86, $112,610 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program. In addition, $5,104 was spent for rehabilitation work at Scottsville, VA. General Investigations 29. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $705,175. Work performed consisted of: Item FY86 Expenditure Navigation Studies ........................................ $138,988 Flood Control Studies........................................ 30,462 Shoreline Protection Studies ............................ 37,375 Review of Authorized Projects...................... 349,263 Special Investigations...................................... 29,512 FERC Licensing.................................................. 5,219 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies... 40,210 Supplmntl Preauth Studies (Flood Control).. 74,146 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Dtring the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of Basic Data was $181,707, consisting of $59,758 for Management Services Unit, $70,432 for Technical Service, and $51,517 on a Hurricane Evacuation Study. 31. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Work was initiated on the 1974 modification of the Virginia Beach (Hurricane Protection) Erosion Control project. Total project costs amounted to $797,954 for this fiscal year. Work performed included preparing a work plan, topographic surveys, exploration, beach sampling, environmental analysis and hydraulic model study. Work was completed on the Norfolk Harbor Deepening project. Total project costs amounted to $1,770,444 and included work on the 55-foot channel and anchorage plan. Other work performed included environmental and economic studies, preparation of reports and surveys. Work was also completed on the Richmond (Local Protection) Flood Control project. Total project costs this fiscal year amounted to $1,011,379. Work performed included design of interior drainage system, civil and structural engineering, bridge studies, archeological studies and geotechnical investigations. All work was performed by government plant and hired labor. 5-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 To 30 Sep 1986 In Tect 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, VA and the St. John's River, FL (Norfolk Dist) (Regular Funds) 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk Dist) (Regular Funds) 3. Broad Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Cranes Creek, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost Recreation Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 2,077,000 1,213,817 2,570,649 1,964,374 1,415,832 2,343,728 2,521,787 1,931,265 3,688,3721 3,688,372' 45,169,3352 45,083,287 479,947 479,947 59,871 59,871 1,079,000 1,885,518 40,000 200,690 46,945 353,314 24,945 375,313 88,000 968,902 88,001 967,792 12,250 12,251 74,139 74,139 8,015,0733 8,015,0733 9,633,388 9,645,278 27,888 27,888 568,418 568,418 500 500 9,798 8,545 32,724 33,977 708,366 1,381,182 918,0.15 625,959 1,484,896 917,618 - 113,223 - 113,222 65,107 65,508 622,644 622,644 606,931 606,930 227,000 227,000 5,444,514 5,444,514 3,850 3,850 6,274 6,274 - 187,000 - 175,130 200,231 212,101 394,556 394,556 5-14 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 30 Sep 1986 in Text 7 Greenvale Creek,VA (Regular Funds) 8. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA Collection and Removal of Drift (Regular Funds) 9. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Little Machipongo River, VA (Regular Funds) 11. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Nottoway River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Parker Creek, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 155,000 169,526 178,241 120,910 221,568 178,209 37,196 37,196 185,105 185,163 1,440,000 814,658 1,538,877 2,311,895 1,689,700 1,076,147 1,430,155 2,312,981 50,000 - 67,500 - 39,163 26,719 26,719 (-)2,548 56,000 19,755 5,590 5,590 6,013 31,512 11,000 28,579 64,811 64,809 63,000 15,127 2,424 84,934 84,735 15,000 297,000 .. 271,772 7,305,699 4,627,375 3,816,880 5,369,398 4,648,737 9,369,636 3,739,813 4,840,919 10,000 8,734 - 21,000 - 20,999 29,329 29,328 5-15 20,003 20,003 223,125 223,125 2,940,984 2,940,984 7,639,904 7,639,904 28,523,481 28,415,589 413,456 360,850 93,500 85,166 230,328 230,127 36,711,1156 36,670,887 74,897,654 74,289,106 179,480 179,480 44,295 44,295 10,000 8,734 34,000 15,530 147,973 147,971 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 30 Sep 1986 in Text 14. Quinby Creek, VA 15. Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Regular Funds) 16. Tangier Channel, VA (Regular Funds) 17. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 18. York River, VA (Regular Funds) 20. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 23. Richmond, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost' New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Cost New Work Approp Cost (-)13,418 128,504 - 40,766 - 30,766 212,000 230,912 247,759 176,835 274,501 247,229 (-)7,881 66,945 536,348 536,346 260,225 261,036 76,399 76,401 1,354,300 175,000 212,000 1,048,097 1,001,236 547,251 211,272 900,425 380,000 430,000 363,513 384,330 16,500 16,350 9,747 10,183 10,333 330,000 361,017 104,176 104,176 771,973 761,973 5,103,824 5,103,824 116,550 116,550 2,414,829 2,414,829 850,498 850,498 10,910,729 10,762,248 180,904 180,904 204,854 204,854 4,270,195 4,237,030 204,683 204,683 193,721 833,000 838,172 820,000 914,128 870,000 852,484 - 15.000 - 80,670,527 80,670,527 880,842 7,257,842 851,948 7,203,492 584,000 591,086 599,000 591,086 5-16 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 30 Sep 1986 In Text 24. Saxis Island, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp - - 37,700 20,000 57,700 Cost - - 21,670 14,693 36,363 25. Scottsville, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp - 213,500 3,090,000 - 3,303,500 Cost - 47,345 151,884 722,029 921,258 26. Virginia Beach New Work Streams, Canal Approp 33,000 - 15,000 408,000 843,000 Number 2, VA Cost 57,446 10,864 7,088 43.661 462,661 Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 Includes $52,804 for previous projects. s Costs prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (Baltimore District). Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, VA and Cape Henry Channel, VA. 4 Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended from military funds for construction-of a wharf. 5 Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6 Includes $2,561,704 for previous projects and new work. ' Includes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 19, 1890 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) May 17, 1950 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 1 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, Va. to sounds of North Carolina Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) A channel 42 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet BROAD CREEK, VA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging a channel through Cherrystone Inlet and bar CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 5 of Text) Existing Project CRANES CREEK, VA (See Section 6 of Text) Entrance Channel 6 fet dep, 80 feet wide GREENVALE CREEK (See Section 7 of Text) Existing Project HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 8 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton roads and its tributary waters 5-18 H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Congs., 3d sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62d Congs., 2d sess. H. Doc. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 23. 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 190, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 381, 76th Cong., 1st sess. unknown Approved in 1972 H. Doc. 687, 76th Cong., 3d sess. Approved in 1965 Specified in Act NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents JAMES RIVER, VA. (See Section 9 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth ot Richmond and construct spur and training dikes June 13, 1902 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Mar. 3, 1905 Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond July 3, 1930 Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Aug. 26, 1937 Removal of Trigg cofferdam Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Rich mond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA (See Section 10 of Text) Jul. 3, 1930 Existing Project. S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 260, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 June 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 NORFOLK HARBOR, VA. (See Section 11 of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard. Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch. Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal. 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line .RR Bridge. Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia Ry. bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR Bridge. Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square. Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900.feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end. 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basirn opposite St. Julians Creek. Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep arid 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73d Cong., 2d sess.2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 5-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet. Removel of shoals at mouth. Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge. July 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley. Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge. WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge. July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge. SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. ANCHORAGES June 25, 1910 30-foot anchorage'at Lambert Point Aug. 8, 1917 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point Sept 3, 1954 An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. Oct. 27, 1965 Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius. NOTTAWAY RIVER, VA (See Section 12 of Text) July 14, 1960 Existing Project PARKER CREEK, VA (See Section 13 of Text) Jul. 14, 1960 Existing Project (Sec. 107) QUINBY CREEK, VA (See Section 14 of Text) May 17, 1950 Existing project. TANGIER CHANNEL, VA (See Section 16 of Text) Mar. 2, 1919 Channel from Tangier Sound and anchorage Jan. 3, 1934 (P.W.A. Act) & Aug. 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Modified project dimensions Jul. 14, 1960 Channel across Tangier Island (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d ses,. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2d sess.' S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1965 Approved in 1964. H. Doc. 241, 81st Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 107, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 51, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 141, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1964 5-20 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 107) June 14, 1880 1884 1887 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 July 24, 1946 Aug. 15, 1985 July 24, 1946 1948 (Sec. 205) Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 201) WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 17 of the Text) Existing project adopted. Project modified. Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and incorporated in Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia. YORK RIVER, VA (See Section 18 of Text) Project Authorized Project Modified Project Modified VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 20 of Text) Project authorized. Project modified. Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 22 of Text) Project authorized. RICHMOND, VA (See Section 23 of Text) Existing project. SAXIS ISLAND, VA (See Section 24 of Text) Existing project. SCOTTSVILLE, VA (See Section 25 of Text) Project Approved VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO. 2, VA. BEACH, VA. (See Section 26 of Text) Project authorized. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2d sess H. Doc. 178,98th Cong., 2nd Session Approved in 1986 H. Doc. 551, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 640, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 5-21 ' Contains latest published map.s For latest published map. See H. Doc. 1246. 62d Cong., 3d Sess. 2 Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 23, 1935. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Avail- Year of able Miter Sills Opened Miles Cham- for Full Character to from Location ber Width Lift Upper Lower of Navi- Cost Norfolk, Va. feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 12.4 Albemarle and Chesa- 75 600 2.7 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 peake Canal (Great and shells Bridge, Va.) 10.7 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $372,556 (South Mills, N.C.) with cutoff walls '16 feet at mean low water 5-22 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Appomattox River, Va. 1 Aberdeen Creek, Va.2 Blackwater River, Va. Active portion2 1 Carters Creek, Va. Active portion2 3 Channel to Newport News, VA Channel from Phoebus, Va. to deepwater in Hampton Roads 2 Channel connecting York River, Va. Back Creek to Slaights Wharf2 Chesconessex Creek, Va.2 Chincoteague Bay, VA Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA Chowan River, N.C.2 Cockrells Creek, Va.4 Davis Creek, Va.2 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. Deep Creek, Newport News, Va.2 Dymers Creek, Va.2 Hampton Creek, Va. Horn Harbor, Va. 2 Hoskins Creek, Va.2 Jackson Creek, Va.2 Jarvis Creek, Va.4 Kings Creek, Va.4 Lafayette River, Va. 2 Little River (Creek), Va.2 13 Locklies Creek, Va.2 Lynnhaven inlet, VA Meherrin River, N.C. 2 Milford Haven, Va.2 Mill Creek, Va.2 Mulberry Creek, Va.2 Nandua Creek, Va.2 Nansemond River, Va.8 Newport News Creek, Va.2 Occohannock Creek, Va. Active portion2 Onancock River, Va.2 5 Oyster Channel, VA 2 Pagan River, Va.26 Pamunkey River, Va. Active portion2 Parrotts Creek, Va.2 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot 2 1980 1975 1975 1951 1985 1944 1950 1968 1984 1985 1975 1949 1971 1974 1980 1953 1981 1964 1977 1971 1979 1957 1982 1966 1928 1985 1950 1950 1937 1950 1950 1978 1962 1951 1963 1984 1950 1964 1957 1947 $870,341 $863,140 109,643 200,893 342,118 151,735 28,398 3,277 8,955.974 5,720,969 11,500 14,855 25,516 25,126 49,396 107,220 97,612 83,000 288,278 5,582 186,237 13,987 44,100 8,500 39,259 5,593 242,047 168,623 11,581 445,354 47,734 24,568 5,445 2,393 6,988 167,477 135,600 13,859 187,914 119,117 51,425 31,376 37,045 165,566 32,442 36,874 31,889 371,984 132,327 158,323 39,675 2,054,201 4,610 1,116,952 88,488 622,801 34,437 153,598 442,033 9,560 2,098,035 49,591 32,322 4,346 2,458 39,804 426,777 147,570 78,283 427,233 630,353 284,381 161,183 37,771 66,162 5-23 19,300 1,200 2,500 5,700 4,000 62,969 500 188,962 16,955 98,580 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Queens Creek 2 Rappahannock River, Va.9 10 12 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va.4 Starlings Creek, Va. 2 Taskinas Creek, Va. Thimble Shoal. Channel, VA 2 Totuskey Creek, Va. Tylers Beach, Va.2 Urbanna Creek, Va.2 7 Whitings Creek, Va. Winter Harbor, Va. 2 Willoughby Channel, Va. 2 Wishart Point Channel, Va. 2 1979 1983 1950 1981 1975 1985 1970 1982 1963 1971 1981 1953 1975 Ilncludes $22,500 for previous projects. 2Completed. 31n addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 4lnactive. 5lncludes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. 6lncludes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. TABLE 5-E 26,949 101,803- 414,633 1,958,360- 66,242 603,632- 7,479 135 - 13,534,967 11,025,732- 167,869 450,693 2,000 261,201 404,943- 55,724 106,868- 21,630 112,333 500 171,334 291,048 2,973 8,500 42,485- 118,762 102,244 30,625 71n addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 8lncludes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 9 In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 10 lncludes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 1 1Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 12lncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 13Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park. 1979 $471,474 - $176,671 Newport News, Va Hampton Institute 1976 S$156.906 - $175,845 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Buena Vista, Va. 1977 $ 417,900' - Newmarket Creek, Va. 1970 1,000,000 12,283 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. 1973 1,851,933 32,877 516,256 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 1985 478,224- Salem Church Lake, Va. 1976 1,896,716' 2 - - 'Preconstruction planning terminated. 2lncludes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-24 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 5-G Name of Project RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted CONDITION SURVEYS Baltimore Harbor Cape Henry Channel Rappahannock Shoal Channel Jul 1986 Oct - Nov 1985 Dam Neck Disposal Area Jul 1986 Guilford Creek Jul 1986 James River Richmond Deepwater Terminal Turkey Island Nov 1985 Nov 1985 Norfolk Harbor 45' Channel Craney Island Pipeline Rehandling Basin Southern Branch Dec 1985 Feb 1986 Jan 1986 Mar 1986 Mar 1986 Mar 1986 Rudee Inlet Scotts Creek RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS None this fiscal year. 5-25 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Actof 1965)................ .......... 6-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District)..............6-2 3. Avon Harbor,N.C........... .......... 6-4 4. Beaufort Harbor, N. C........................6-4 5. Belhaven Harbor, N. C.......................6-4 6. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington....... 6-5 7. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C......................6-5 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C.. .......... 6-5 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C................. 6-6 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C...................6-7 11. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C...................... 6-7 12. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C................ 6-7 13. Rollinson Channel, N. C............ .......... 6-8 14. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C.....................6-8 15. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C....................6-8 16. Wilmington Harbor, N. C....................6-9 Flood Control 17. 18. 18A. 18B. 19. 20. 21. 21A. 22. 23. Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C...............6-9 Cape Fear River Basin, N. C..................6-10 B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C........ 6-10 Randleman Lake, N. C.................. 6-11 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C.............. 6-11 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project......................6-12 Neuse River Basin, N. C................ 6-12 Falls Lake, N. C.......................6-12 Scuppernong River, N. C................ 6-13 Stuart, Va....................... .......... 6-13 Page 24. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C............ 6-13 24A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C...... ..... ................ 6-13 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...................6-14 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization...................6-14 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 27. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C.......... 27A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservior, Va. and N. C....................... 27B. Philpott Lake, Va................ ....... 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations.................... ... 6-14 ... 6-14 ... 6-15 ... 6-15 General Investigations 29. Surveys........................ ......... 6-16 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data...........6-16 31. Continuation of Planning and Engineering.......................6-17 32. Advance Engineering and Design............. 6-17 Tables Page Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement......... 6-18 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation.............. 6-22 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................6-25 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects....................6-26 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........................6-27 6-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 Page Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects................ 6-28 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...................6-29 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................. 6-29 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs................. 6-30 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................6-31 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY86 included chemical and biological control efforts on 132 acres of hydrilla and chemical control on 46 acres of alligatorweed. Sonar treatment was applied to 32 acres of hydrilla at three lakes in William B. Umstead State Park. Triploid grasscarp were placed in Lake Wheeler to control 100 acres of hydrilla. Successful FY85 alligatorweed control efforts reduced the area which required treatment on the Scuppernong and navigable tributaries to 3 acres. Herbicide application was expanded in the Scuppernong Basin this year to include major drainage canals with an additional 11 acres treated in those areas. Alligatorweed in the Little River Basin required limited spot applications that totaled about 0.5 acres. The Pasquotank River Basin was added as a treatment area this year with 27 acres treated. Four and one half acres required retreatment. Planning efforts included investigations for and the preparation of supplemental information reports for the inclusion of major drainage canals in the Scuppernong Basin and sites in the Pasquotank River Basin in the program. Studies for the inclusion of Egeria sp. as a new problem plant species are ongoing. Investigations of the Lumber River as alligatorweed treatment area and two new hydrilla sites were initiated and several reconnaisance investigations of aquatic weed problems in response to requests by others were made. Control work was accomplished for $55,701. Planning was accomplished at a Federal Cost of $28,216. Condition at end of fiscal year. No hydrilla is known to be growing in any of the Umstead State Park Lakes at this time; however, tubers are present and regrowth is expected. It appears that all three lakes in Umstead State Park will require herbicide treatment in FY87. The sterile triploid grasscarp stocked in Lake Wheeler provided control early in the recreation season but by mid-summer hydrilla reached the problem level. It is expected that the grasscarp will be large enough during the 1987 growing season to provide good control throughout the year. Alligatorweed is under maintenance control in the Scuppernong River, Little River and their major tributaries. These sites should require only spot treatments in FY87; however, the Pasquotank River and tributaries will require extensive weed control operations. Alligatorweed and hydrilla treatment sites presently under investigation will likely be added to the program this fiscal year. Investigations of aquatic weed problems, in response to requests by county governments and municipalities, may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet 6-2 Tables Table 6-F Table 6-G Table 6-H WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Coinjock bridges was authorized in October 1976. Estimated Federal Cost is $46,100,000 (1986). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251.The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $9,110,000 (1986) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Act of 1976 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for the Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Coinjock bridges. The three remaining bridges were not included in this modification and are awaiting additional authorization to reflect 100 percent Federal funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Settlement of a claim on Wilkerson Creek Bridge cost $5,070,724. Replacement of Coinjock Bridge was continued at a cost of $2,253,524. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 72,284 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $222,851; 56,067 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $190,335; and 2,898 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $32,441. The Merritt incurred cost of $559 at New Topsail Inlet. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 126,015 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $320,777; and 87,875 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $168,977. The Currituck had a negative cost of -$1,024 at Bogue Inlet. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 80,900 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $292,857; 129,344 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $312,012; 51,194 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $125,228; and 29,733 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $70,613. During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $282,560. Between November 8, 1985 and July 17, 1986, the contract dredge XL removed 921,871 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel at a cost of $3,013,169. Between April 10 and August 3, 1986, the contract dredge American removed 1,997,521 cubic yards from shoals in Masonboro Inlet for sand bypassing at a Federal cost of $2,305,757 and non-Federal cost of $655,300. The non- Federal share was for pumping additional material to Wrightsville Beach. Design costs for dredging in fiscal year 1987 was $43,310. Marking of easements along the AIWW cost $23,083. Easement and boundary surveys in Onslow, Pender and New Hanover Counties cost $148,283. 6-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $31,102. Disposal area stabilization at Swansboro and Sneads Ferry cost $4,306. Monitoring at Carolina Beach Inlet and Masonboro Inlet cost $12,864. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $6,602. Trash removal at Snow's Cut cost $1,200. Structural repairs to three remaining highway bridges cost $946,804. Reimbursement for damage to bridges was -$58,349. Condition and operation studies cost $440,015. Four highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $626,854. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1983 except for the training wall and three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the bridge replacement program. Coinjock Bridge was completed on November 13, 1986. Total cost for existing project to September 30, 1986 was $115,825,289, of which $41,624,019 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $74,201,270 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 3. AVON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the east coast of North Carolina, 9 miles north of Cape Hatteras. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a direct channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 3.5 miles long from the depth in Pamlico Sound southeast to a basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long at Avon. Plane of reference is mean low water. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound due to winds, seldom range as much as 2 feet above or below mean stage; however, severe windstorms will double or triple that variation. The original project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 316, 76th Cong., 1st sess.) and modification for direct channel authorized May 5, 1965, under Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the basin at Avon, with a total frontage of about 300 feet. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 7 and May 25, 1986, the contract dredges Blue Ridge and Richmond removed 12,541 cubic yards from shoals at Avon at a cost of $264,426. Contributed funds of $74,986 were expended on dikes for pipeline dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) 4. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-footlong section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost in connection with prior year dredging was $7,840. Design for pipeline dredging in fiscal year 1987 was $17,692. Condition and operation studies cost $25,689. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1986, were $827,040 for new work,including $34,000 contributed funds and $3,054,893 for maintenance, including $168,833 contributed funds, a total of $3,881,933. 5. BELHAVEN HARBOR, N. C. Location. The town of Belhaven is at the junction of Pantego Creek and Pungo River, about 11 miles above the mouth of the latter. The harbor consists of the lower reaches of Pantego Creek and is about 6,000 feet long. Pungo River forms part of the Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk and the St. Johns River. Norfolk is 130 miles north of Belhaven and Beaufort 66 miles south. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 123.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water in Pungo River to a point about 800 feet east of the highway bridge, with a turning basin 800 feet long and 300 feet wide at the upper end; and for the construction of 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT timber breakwaters at the mouth of Pantego Creek. Pungo River is a nontidal stream with little slope. Variations in the water surface, due to winds, seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and June 20, 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 12 wharves along the town waterfront, all of timber construction; one is owned by the town and is open to all without charge; four have rail connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Inspection of timber breakwaters cost $13,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1940. 6. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $101,516. Design of portages at the locks cost $657. Design for pipeline dredging in fiscal year 1986 cost $26,779. A feasibility study on spillway repairs cost $9,736. Periodic inspections and evaluation of the three locks and dams cost $39,841. Repairs and installation of dikes at lock and dam no. 1 cost $25,542. Condition and operation studies cost $51,926. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $212,699. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986, were $16,205,198 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $12,594,744 for maintenance. 7. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The dredge Currituck incurred cost of $739. Archeological investigations cost $3,068. Disposal area stabilization at Bardens Inlet cost $566. Condition and operation studies cost $8,381. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 8. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interest must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated 6-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater Jevels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and, (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 54,830 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $101,193. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 96,264 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $465,971. The Snell incurred cost of $119. Archeological investigations of the blockade runner Bendigo and the river cost $238. Between November 8, 1985 and July 17, 1986 the contract dredge XL removed 34,898 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly River at a cost of $165,977. Condition and operation studies cost $12,667. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 9. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12 foot deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deepwater near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12 foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $97,000,000 (1986). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the modification cost $109,007. Maintenance During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 248,320 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,324,134. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 123,123 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $450,395. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired dredging 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT ranges and moorings at a cost of $37,298. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 22,740 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $76,965. Between June 28 and August 3, 1986, the contract dredge Northerly Island removed 219,332 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $561,617. Between February 2 and March 16, 1986, the contract dredge Northerly Island removed 258,750 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $510,953. Between October 8 and November 19, 1985, the contract dredge Northerly Island removed 266,450 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $887,252. Between May 14 and June 1,1986, the contract dredge Clinton removed 130,408 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel at a cost of $290,813. Cost in connection with prior years dredging was $39,141. Expansion of disposal islands cost $6,317. Project monitoring cost $9,736. Litigation cost on the lawsuit brought by the owners of the fishing vessels Brothers Pride and Lois Joyce was $14,868. Condition and operation studies cost $106,473. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 10. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The estimated Federal cost is $55,600,000 (1986) for the jetties. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for construction of the jetties which requires that all lands needed for construction be provided without cost to the United States. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between May 16 and July 17, 1986, the contract dredge Mermentau removed 367,681 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $617,540. Between November 8 and December 8, 1985, the contract dredge Clinton removed 255,743 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $362,586. Between February 11 and May 3, 1986, the contract dredge Jim Bean removed 3,912,894 cubic yards from the Brandt Island disposal area and deposited it on the beach at a cost of $5,150,418. Cost incurred for prior dredging was $1,171. Design for fiscal year 1987 dredging cost $1,535. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $6,765. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $12,504. Condition and operation studies cost $157,840. Contributed funds of $122,543 were expended for State Ports dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1986, was $47,394,517 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $40,892,948 for maintenance, including $874,254 contributed funds. 11. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide, and construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean. Construction of the jetty has been deferred for restudy. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Archeological investigations cost $2,144. Condition and operation studies cost $10,294. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 12. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N. C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a tur- 6-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 nfling basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25,1912; July 3,1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: An environmental assessment and a report to determine the economic justification of the project cost $432. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 13. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 7 and May 25, 1986, the contract dredge Richmond removed 105,966 cubic yards from shoals in Rollinson Channel at a cost of $387,700. Project condition surveys cost $1,374. Contributed funds of $41,142 were expended for diking in connection with pipeline dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 14. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 5 and 8, 1985 the contract dredge Richmond removed 11,092 cubic yards from shoals in Teaches Hole Channel at a cost $91,055. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $58,446. Design for fiscal year 1987 dredging was $17,835. The U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry incurred cost of $101. Condition and operation studies cost $9,708. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 15. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between November 8 and 25, 1985, the contract dredge Richmond removed 50,247 cubic yards from shoals in Atlantic Harbor and Wainwright Slough at a cost of $230,600. Project condition surveys cost $2,132. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River; a 38-footdeep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired survey and dredging ranges at a cost of $18,181. Between December 4, 1985, and February 14, 1986, the contract dredge Mermentau removed 804,086 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $997,230. Between December 17 and 22, 1985, the contract dredge Clinton removed 18,749 cubic yards from shoals in the 32-foot channel at a cost of $93,535. Between October 3 and December 15, 1985, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 405,997 cubic yards from shoals in the river channel at a cost of $606,628. Between March 17 and May 1, 1986, the contract dredge Clinton removed 692,160 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a cost of $454,123. Design for fiscal year 1987 dredging cost $9,317. Environmental analysis of proposed dredge material disposal sites cost $161,520. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $4,716. Condition and operation studies cost $208,239. Contributed funds of $258,112 were expended for diking on pipeline dredging. Contributed funds of $140,539 were expended for dredging of the state ports. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed July 1973 except for latest modification which was completed on October 26, 1982,with maintenance funds. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1986, was $68,392,702 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $54,303,090 was for maintenance, including $3,697,856 contributed funds. Flood Control 17. ARARAT RIVER, MOUNT AIRY, N. C. Location. Ararat River is a tributary of the Yadkin River and is located in Surry County, N. C. The river flows through Mount Airy, N. C., to its confluence with the Yadkin River. The entire project borders Mt. Airy. (See USGS quadrangle sheets, Mount Airy, North, Va. and N. C. and Mount Airy, South, N. C.) Existing project. The project consists of approximately 5,100 feet of industrial area dike construction, approximately 6,700 feet of channel improvement, approximately 1,800 feet of floodwall/dike at the Pine Street commercial area, and a flood warning system. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 10, 1983, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated Federal construction cost is $4,000,000 (1986). Local cooperation. Local interest must: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas and suitable conservation lands to partially compen- 6-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 sate for loss of fish and wildlife resources as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project; (b) accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damage due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (e) prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on channels and interior ponding areas which would reduce their flood-carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation, and control development in the project area to prevent an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and (f) assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4 million. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $2,765,469. Contributed funds of $1,103 were expended for construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded on May 29, 1985, with completion scheduled for February 1987. 18. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs). Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1986, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 18A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N.C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $136,000,000 (1986), consisting of $77,790,500 for construction, and $58,209,500 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,900,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $38,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $180,000. Assurances that these obligations for water storage would be assumed have been received from the Department of Natural and Economic Resources, State of North Carolina. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $772,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of wildlife subimpoundments was continued at a cost of $3,320,816. Parkers Creek recreation area was completed at a cost of $354,220. Poplar Point recreation area was initiated at a cost of $3,450,521. The management center was initiated at a cost of $178,534. The Tailrace access area was initiated at a cost of $55,623. Total Federal expenditures were $8,595,667, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Seaforth recreation area and Parkers Creek security building, 100 percent; Crosswinds campground, 90 percent; Ebenezer Church recreation area, 100 percent; N. C. Park maintenance headquarters, 100 percent; rehabilitate Mason House, 100 percent; and Crosswinds and Poplar Point security buildings, 80 percent. Maintenance: Water quality studies were 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT conducted at a cost of $143,468. Periodic inspections cost $17,539. Repairs to access road cost $307. Automatic gate control system cost $5,409. Normal operation and maintenance cost $712,981. Condition at end of fiscal year. Relocations complete except for Public Service Gas Co. Recreation facilities and wildlife subimpoundments are underway. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for March 1989. 18B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,300 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $115,000,000 (1986), consisting of $53,659,600 for construction and $61,340,400 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (1) In accordance with the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (P.L. 89-72): (a) Administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife and to assure access to such development to all on equal terms; (b) pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $25,752,000; and (c) bear all the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $407,000 annually; (2) In accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, assure payment to the United States of all costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $61,171,000 for construction and $445,000 annually for operation, maintenance, and major replacement; (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to water-rights claims resulting from construction and operation of the project; (4) Prevent encroachment on downstream channels to the extent needed to provide effective reservoir operation; (5) Exercise to the full extent of their legal capability control against removal of stream-flow made available for preservation of downstream fishery habitat; and (6) Pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to flood control presently estimated at $5,077,000 for construction and $32,000 annually for operation, maintenance and major replacement. These assurances are subject to the provision that Federal participation in measures required to safeguard the quality of water in Randleman Reservoir shall not be provided as a substitute for the responsiblity of local interests to provide adequate treatment in accordance with water quality standards established pursuant to the Water Quality Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500). Reasonable assurances that the requirements will be fulfilled have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $27,356. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. A new construction start was granted for FY 1987. 19. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 31,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. Along the northern 2,050 feet, the project includes a rock revetment at elevation 12 fronted by a 130-foot-wide berm at elevation 8. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $15,062,000 (1986). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost in connection with prior year nourishment was $50. A cost adjustment caused a decrease in Federal expenses of -$40,789 and an increase in non-Federal expenses of 6-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 $40,789. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. A contract for the first increment of renourishment was awarded on March 8, 1985 and was completed on June 10, 1985. 20. LEESVILLE, VA., ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT Location. The project is located on the Roanoke (Staunton) River in southwest Virginia near the Town of Leesville in Campbell and Pittsylvania counties. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Leesville, Va.) Existing project. The project provides for a total of about 2,200 linear feet of streambank protection on two separate sites along a 3-mile segment of the river between Leesville Dam and the town of Leesville. Three methods of erosion control were used, they were: stone rubble with vegetation, rubber tire mattress and rock windrow. The project was funded for construction by the Chief of Engineers in February 1978, under Section 32, P.L. 93-251. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Monitoring of Leesville and Little Rockfish Creek cost $23. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1981. The project is functioning as designed. 21. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1986. 21A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 92 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100-feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 335,620 acre-feet, of which 220,880 acre-feet is for flood control, 34,970 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 54,700 acre-feet for water-quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $163,000,000, (1986) consisting of $72,767,800 for construction and $90,232,200 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $12,400,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $89,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $18,600,000, and, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,224,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The Corps management center was completed at a cost of $155,258. Sandling Beach recreation area was completed at a cost of $699,129. Rolling View campground and recreation facilities were initiated at a cost of $665,526. Wildlife recreation areas were completed at a cost of $784,746. Total Federal expenditures were $3,876,795, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Fish and wildlife subimpoundments, 15 percent; and Mangum House rehabilitation, 100 percent. Maintenance: Water quality studies were conducted at a cost of $91,493. Repairs to the dam cost $6,016. Borrow area repairs cost $522,702. Emergency lighting cost $837. Periodic inspections cost $21,146. Normal operation and maintenance cost $819,332, for a total of $1,461,526. 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. Dam, access road, clearing, main operations area, all relocations and 33 percent of the recreation facilities are completed. Recreation facilities, fish and wildlife facilities and State management and O&M facilities are the major items remaining. 22. SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. Location. The stream rises in the east-central portion of Washington County, N. C., flows east into Tyrrell County, and thence north into Albemarle Sound, a total distance of about 22 miles. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Creswell, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a 70-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet, along Scuppernong River from Spruills Bridge to the confluence with Mauls Creek, a distance of 2.0 miles, and excavating a 45-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 6 feet to 8 feet, along Mauls Creek from Scuppernong River to County Road 1163, a distance of 1.8 miles. Total project length is 3.8 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $509,000 (1984). Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1966 (with modification adding Mauls Creek approved June 16, 1967), under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion; contribute, in cash, 31.4 percent of construction costs, currently estimated at $141,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has not been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project reanalysis cost $14,830. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis and environmental studies have been completed. The project is being terminated due to the State of N. C. not issuing a water quality certification. 23. STUART, VA. Location. The project is located on the South Mayo River at Stuart, Va., above and below Route 8 highway. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Stuart, Va.) Existing project. The recommended plan consists of a 100-foot-bottom-width high flow diversion channel combined with downstream river widening. A wier will be placed across the entrance to the diversion channel and a bench channel design will be used for the downstream river widening. The South Mayo River above Route 8 highway will be widened to a 50-foot bottom width, using a trapezoidal channel design and the commercial site northwest of Route 8 will be filled to the elevation of approximately the 200-year frequency flood. All river widening, except for a short distance above Route 8, will be done on the north bank. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $2,320,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 1, 1985, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas, and all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4 million; presribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachments; continue to enforce flood plan regulations that comply with FEMA guidelines; and at least annually, inform affected interests regarding the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction was initiated at a cost of $202,768. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded May 16, 1986, and is scheduled for completion in December 1987. 24. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 24A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 6-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of An intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Siesmic studies of the dam cost $10,006.Rip-rap protection cost $7,950. Rehabilitation of campsites was accomplished at a cost of $11,194. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,130,205 for a total of $1,159,355. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1985: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $34,000. Total cost to September 30, 1986, was $339,559, charged to operations. 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization/. (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $262,418. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $125,097. Field surveys for the November 1985 flooding on the Roanoke River cost $4,608. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 27. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 27A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of a washhouse at Longwood and a dump station and washhouse at Northbend Park was completed at a cost of $188,245 in addition to cost incurred under maintenance. Cost-sharing with the State of N. C. at various sites cost $11,122. Maintenance: Modification of the highway intersection at the powerhouse cost $1,883. Preservation of archeological sites at Satterwhite Point cost $32,486. Stability analysis of the dam cost $54,548. 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Construction of the management center was initiated at a cost of $412,285. Investigation of shoreline erosion cost $604. Repairs on the right wing dike cost $1,609,659. Rehabilitation of campsites at North Bend Park cost $8,341. Design for highway bridge repairs cost $59,113. Study on impact of water withdrawals cost $3,596. Work on the South Boston litigation cost $7,845. Work on the fire protection system for the powerhouse cost $17,218. Dam break model analysis cost $48,441. Work on the fire extinguishing and suppression system cost $16,399. Paving of recreation access roads cost $356,831. Engineering and design for replacement of the powerhouse computer cost $12,519. Real estate work in the South Boston area cost $34,218. Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $5,826. Final guide taking line study cost $35,489. Flood damage and benefit updating system cost $15,164. Construction of a washhouse at Longwood and a dump station and washhouse at Northbend Park cost $212,994 in addition to cost incurred under construction. Investigation and stability analysis of earth dikes cost $40,293. Investigation and stability analysis of Island Creek dam cost $31,143. Design of courtesy docks cost $8,010. Replacement of guard rail at Island Creek dam cost $841. Normal operation and maintenance cost $3,550,979, for a total of $6,576,725. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 27B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream ,from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Water system modifications in the Tailrace area cost $22,770. Maintenance: Design of a powerhouse fire protection system cost $7,360. Construction of management and visitors center cost $528,048. Sluice bulkhead cost $34,928. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,512,335, for a total of $2,082,671. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1986 at elevation 214.85 feet, MSL or 1.15 feet below normal pool. Declining streamflows and below normal rainfall gradually lowered the lake level to 213.35 feet MSL, at the end of October. In November, very heavy rain brought the lake elevation to 224.60 feet MSL, on the 24th which was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. The 9.40 inches of rainfall observed in November set a new record high for the month. The lake level fluctuated close to normal pool from December to April. Only twice did this pattern alter when heavy rains brought the lake level to elevation 218.90 and 219.15 feet MSL, on December 2 and March 16, respectively. In early May, the effects of below normal rainfall for several months began to show as Jordan Lake level started a downward trend. From December to July, observed rainfall was 53% below normal. These conditions proved to be the worst drought situation the Cape Fear River Basin has experienced over the period of record. On August 11, Jordan Lake reached the minimum elevation for the fiscal year at 209.10 feet MSL, or 6.90 feet below normal pool. At this point, only 42% of the conservation pool was remaining. Heavy rain in late August temporarily reduced the severity of the drought and pushed the lake level to elevation 213.75 feet MSL on September 2. Jordan Lake once again began a downward trend to end the fiscal year at elevation 211.60 feet MSL or 4.4 feet below normal pool. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1986 were $297,000 which makes the cumulative total since impoundment of the project equal to $3,702,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $127,741. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1986 at elevation 248.87 feet MSL or 1.2 feet below normal pool. Below normal rainfall produced a gradual drawdown of the lake to elevation 247.50 feet MSL on November 3. A new high period of record average rainfall amount of 9.97 inches above Falls Dam for the month of November produced the maximum elevation for the year of 256.35 feet MSL on November 23. Falls Lake then remained near elevation 250 feet MSL through mid-March. Heavy rainfalls produced a minor rise to elevation 252.47 feet MSL on March 16. Falls Lake fell below rule curve in early April and did not recover to this level through the remainder of fiscal year 1986. A lack of rainfall and increased evaporation coupled with water supply and water quality demands from Falls Lake caused a gradual drawdown to elevation 245.40 feet MSL on August 11 which was the minimum elevation for the fiscal year. At this time only 38% of the water quality storage and 76% of the water supply storage remained in the lake. Heavy rainfall during late August caused the lake to recover to elevation 249.44 feet MSL on August 31. Again, the lake level began a gradual drawdown to end the fiscal year at elevation 248.26 feet MSL. The summer of 1986 will go down as one of the driest on record for the piedmont area of North Carolina. A new record low rainfall amount of 0.84 inches for the month of June was recorded for the area above Falls Dam and overall observed rainfall and inflow for the period December through June was 52% and 6-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 61% below normal, respectively. The temporary operation plan for Falls Lake which was in effect at the beginning of fiscal year 1986 has been agreed to by officials from the Wilmington District, State of North Carolina and City of Raleigh. This revised operation plan provides for Falls Lake to be operated at a normal pool elevation of 251.0 feet MSL during the months of May through September and at a normal pool level of 250.1 feet MSL during the months of November through March. Also, this plan specifies a minimum target flow in the Neuse River at the Smithfield river gage of 184 c.f.s. during the months of November through March and 254 c.f.s. during the months of April through October for water quality purposes. The minimum instantaneous discharge from Falls Dam under this revised plan will be about 60 c.f.s. during the months of November through March and 100 c.f.s. during April through October. These discharges may be altered at the discretion of the District Engineer in emergency situations. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1986 were $2,367,000 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $8,719,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $110,535. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservior, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1986 at elevation 298.09 feet MSL or 1.41 feet below rule curve. Excessive rainfall in early November caused a rapid rise in the reservoir level to elevation 308.90 feet MSL or 12.2 feet above rule curve which was the maximum elevation of the fiscal year. Two additional reservoir level rises of 306.65 and 305.36 feet MSL occurred on November 25 and December 3, respectively. Minor rises in February and March allowed the reservoir level to remain near rule curve. The effects of well below normal rainfall for several months began to show in April producing declining inflows and a falling reservoir level. Observed rainfall and inflow for the period December through June were 54% and 50% below normal, respectively. The Kerr reservoir level began to fall in April and continued through early August. The minimum elevation of the fiscal year was 295.06 feet MSL or 4.4 feet below rule curve on August 6. Rainfall in August and September coupled with reducing power generation to a minimum helped to raise the reservoir level to near elevation 298 feet MSL on September 8 and then end the fiscal year at elevation 295.38 feet MSL or 4.1 feet below rule curve. Due to the drought, the 13 foot minimum stage required in the Lower Roanoke River at Weldon for striped bass fish spawning was only met April 28 to May 26. All inflows to Kerr Reservoir were controlled without having to spill water over the spillway or through the sluices. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 329,994,600 kilowatts and power revenue was $4,456,320 making a cumulative total since inception of $120,214,028. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were $4,100,000 which makes the cumulative total since the project began equal to $76,207,000. The total cost of functional operation for the fiscal year was $179,368. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began fiscal year 1986 at elevation 971.22 feet MSL or 0.28 feet below rule curve and remained near rule curve through October. Flood producing rainfall during the first week of November raised the lake level on November 5 to 982.01 feet MSL the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. Below normal rainfall in December and January produced a drawdown of the lake to rule curve in December where it remained through January. February through May the lake was at an elevation approximately one foot below rule curve due to normal rainfall and drying conditions except in mid-March when the lake rose briefly above rule curve following heavy rains. In June and July as below normal rainfall and declining inflows continued, a gradual drawdown of Philpott Lake began which lasted through mid-August. Observed rainfall and inflows for the period of December through June were 59 and 40 percent below normal, respectively. Intense rainfall and a reduction in generation requirements during late August provided temporary relief as the lake level continued to rise through early September. Below normal rainfall again produced a drawdown of Philpott Lake through September. The lake reached the minimum elevation for the fiscal year of 963.81 feet MSL or 7.69 feet below the rule curve on September 30. All inflows to Philpott Lake during fiscal year 1986 were controlled without having to spill water over the spillway. However, the early November flood required water to be released throught the sluice gates to maintain the lake level below the spillway crest. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were $1,200,000 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $22,670,000. Gross generation amounted to 24,285,470 kilowatt-hours and power revenue was $887,209 for a total of $14,635,222 since inception. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $93,822. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1986 at elevation 1,024.30 feet MSL or 5.70 feet below normal pool. As the area received near normal amounts of rain, the reservoir level remained five to six feet below normal pool through early November. The lake level rose to its maximum elevation for the fiscal year of 1,038.35 feet MSL on November 5 as the area received 8.57 inches of rainfall. Scott Reservoir returned to a level slightly above normal pool and remained there until late December. Below normal rainfall and declining inflows caused the reservoir level to drop to elevation 1,027.80 feet MSL on January 16. The reservoir level remained at or slightly below normal pool through February. Heavy rainfall during mid-March caused a minor reservoir rise to elevation 1,032.25 feet MSL on March 20. Scott Reservoir level once again returned to and remained at or slightly below normal pool through the end of May. Below normal rainfall and declining inflows caused the reservoir level to drop through mid-August. Observed rainfall and inflows for the period of December through August were 47% and 43% below normal, respectively. The lake level reached a minimum elevation for the fiscal year on August 17 of 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 1,022.98 feet MSL or 7.02 feet below normal pool. Heavy rainfall during mid-August caused the lake level to rise slightly. Another storm in early September produced a rapid rise to normal pool. However, by mid-September the reservoir level was again below normal pool. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 1,025.62 feet MSL or 4.38 feet below normal pool. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were $133,000 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $60,084,000. The total cost of functional operation for the period was $76,889. General Investigations 29. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,565,210, of which $139,649 was for navigation studies, $1,139,913 was for flood control studies, $149,441 was for beach erosion studies, $5,120 for review of authorized projects, $77,000 for Special Investigations, $10,361 for FERC licenses review, $3,000 for soil conservation service, $16,156 for hydrologic studies, and $24,570 for cooperation with states. 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non- Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $196,142. Total costs to September 30, 1986 were $3,809,033. 31. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Continuation of Planning and Engineering for the Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, Headwaters Area cost $132,260. This is the first report since CP&E was initiated. 32. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance engineering and design for Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C., cost $360. 6-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Avon Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Belhaven Harbor, N.C. 6. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 7. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 18,000 13,184 3,644,4772 703,9513 3,783,937 3,914,751 73,740 57,800 14,000 44 44 243,500 50,8808 32,000 73,559 34,000 70,000 43,591 876,080 3,934,987 3,760,711 4,011,260 1,551 29,0516 46,000 50,440 4,800,000 4,057,998 5,205,000 5,345,207 14,000 - 8,870 8,844 -23,849 186,771 43,500 44,344 34,000 76,400 76,379 1,106 1,106 414,000 434,800 7,000 11,069 -93,477 125,319 363,000 360,874 92,650 424,400 423,514 136,200 138,455 -156,545 -78,833 361,000 356,941 92,65015 517,800 519,195 146,400 146,585 235,600 232,291 100,000 83,917 6,469,000 7,324,248 9,777,600 9,563,186 718,630 653,300 264,400 264,426 74,986 74,986 51,200 51,221 353,400 309,487 31,809 31,809' 41,851,973^ 41,735,875^ 74,084,6605 73,641,6045 86,851 86,851 732,630 667,300 74,096 74,096 363,049 363,049 74,986 74,986 818,040* 818,040 2,898,91410' o 2,898,914 o 10 34,000 34,000 168,833 168,833 - 126,687 - 126,687 13,800 54,406 13,800 54,406 - 3,759,57311 - 3,759,57311 618,000 12,753,61412 468,696 12,602,92212 - 88,328 - 88,328 13,000 2,269,171 12,754 2,267,730 - 241,272 13 - 241,27214 746,200 3,385,846 746,165 3,370,357 - 92,650 - 92,650 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 12. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C. 13. Rollinson Channel, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 1,000,000 1,037,405 4,941,000 4,270,169 2,200 3,418,000 3,347,194 40,080 40,080 18,000 20,420 1,429 7,036 309,000 407,288 52,608 265,750 5,354,000 5,847,149 354,367 280,371 500,000 407,323 3,004,500 3,981,556 10,000 1,906 3,459,011 3,554,083 5,000 5,435 7,700 7,700 180,206 180,986 40,000 154,087 6,259 8,224 2,521,850 2,513,647 255,004 59,000 169,188 5,145,900 5,166,545 963,940 965,826 1,794,000 1,745,676 270,954 55,000 14,100 14,741 44,200 44,168 1,500 1,500 391,400 338,255 198,833 198,837 3,902,000 3,997,363 580,284 553,500 109,007 4,126,500 4,315,962 6,262,000 6,310,359 261,550 122,543 11,000 12,438 400 432 389,074 389,074 41,142 41,142 7,484,94516 7,474,07916 34,068,407 34,047,622 1,071,940 1,065,732 6,546,05317 6,546,05317 40,303,27318 40,303,25118 1,229,215 874,254 346,240 346,240 908,144 906,943 674,651 674,651 822,978 822,978 589,105 589,105 1,333,676 1,333,676 41,142 41,142 - 184,284 - 184,284 168,000 3,650,618 177,145 3,606,618 - 75,000 - 75,000 - 502,567 - 502,567 232,732 2,389,321 232,732 2,389,321 - 2,452 - 2,452 - 18,715,22619 - 18,715,22619 2,590,000 51,247,320 � 2,553,489 51,207,848 " 452,560 3,782,54521 398,651 3,697,85621 6-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 17. Ararat River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18B. Randleman Lake, N. C. 19. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo Project 21A. Falls Lake, N. C. 22. Scuppernong River, N.C. 23. Stuart, Va. 24A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 27A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA & N.C. 27B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 450,000 22 260,00024 418,48423 226,74624 - 12,300 2,500,000 2,407,679 589,000 571,995 455,000 276,193 5,800,000 5,304,189 632,900 601,634 250,000 298,513 - -295,000 49,483 -120,714 571,408 25 267,79626 1,279 7,700,000 6,189,542 605,000 576,848 1,654 1,450,000 4,688,430 601,000 584,999 - 33,776 20,00729 30,812 29 45,000 42,496 1,167,000 989,327 9,000 127,362 3,747,759 3,542,191 184,000 224,709 1,116,000 1,025,106 60,000 35,771 1,172,716 1,268,670 225,000 76,081 4,001,091 4,128,796 80,000 118,049 1,158,300 1,223,739 2,000,000 280,590 1,000,000 22,366 6,041,000 6,145,290 822,400 789,652 86,195 803,000 835,817 992,200 898,78727 322 5,200,000 4,388,394 917,200 901,339 43,000 39,767 29 115,000 127,330 1,103,200 1,130,085 4,550,000 4,579,003 4,047,200 4,168,199 -50,000 30,222 1,368,100 1,315,095 - 8,841,326 - 8,841,326 1,216,100 12,566,54832 1,159,355 12,405,50533 6-20 997,540 2,765,469 1,103 8,109,000 8,595,667 814,400 879,704 27,356 -40,739 -52,624 40,789 23 2,694,000 3,876,795 1,748,000 1,461,526 14,830 570,000 202,768 3,707,540 3,691,289 1,012,300 23,469 114;157,641 111,726,877 4,326,356 4,264,794 1,721,389 1,721,389 4,170,588 4,144,186 7,898,533 7,849,092 5,694,965 5,694,965 367,75528 364,42528 135,014,996 134,299,507 4,275,200 3,910,242 234,682 233,111 790,000 3o 408,36531 5,400 199,367 6,857,000 6,576,725 -5,400 22,770 2,089,000 2,082,671 94,402,927 94,397,943 59,852,042 , 59,160,997 3 14,796,384 14,796,384 18,945,306 36 18,732,628 3 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 1986 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes preauthorization study funds for Bogue Inlet: FY 82, $14,000; FY 83, $38,490; and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 83, $38,510. 3. Includes preauthorization study costs for Bogue Inlet: FY 82, $7,174; FY 83, $45,316; and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 83, $21,368. 4. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 5. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 6. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 7. Includes preauthorization study funds for Morgan Creek: FY 82, $15,000; FY 83, $18,822; and preconstruction and construction funds: FY 83, $209,678. 8. Includes preauthorization study costs for Morgan Creek: FY 82, $8,790; FY 83, $25,032; and preconstruction and construction costs: FY 83, $17,058. 9. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 10. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 11. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 12. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 13. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 14. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 15. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 16. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 17. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 18. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 19. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 20. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 21. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 22. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 81, $153,000; FY 82, $128,000; FY 83, $62,487; and preconstruction funds: FY 83, $106,513. 23. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 81, $116,322; FY 82, $162,793; FY 83, $64,372; and preconstruction costs: FY 83, $74,997. 24. Includes $6,924 preauthorization costs. 25. Includes $400,000 refund to local interests. 26. Includes $128,345 refund to local interests. 27. Includes $82,600 refund to local interests. 28. Includes monitoring costs: FY 80, $7,414; FY 81, $10,842; FY 82, $1,382. 29. Preauthorization cost. 30. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 83, $45,000; FY 84, $9,986; and preconstruction funds: FY 84, $50,014; FY 85, $115,000. 31. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 83, $42,496; FY 84, $12,490; and preconstruction costs: FY 84, $23,281; FY 85, $127,330. 32. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000. 33. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379. 34. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646. 35. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83,$77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296. 36. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000. 37. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000. 6-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 Nov. 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 31, 1970 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River Section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins.5 A 12-foot channel in New River.6 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet. A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 Oct. 17, 1940 Feb. 7, 1967 sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 4 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 14 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big cFhoaont nSell,o usgamh eC hannels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 15 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 74 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. No. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess. ' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H. D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess. ' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' S. D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 6-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H. D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1968 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. Sept. 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. Feb. 24, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 1960'� 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project classified as inactive. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report Project See Annual Operation and Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control1 (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 - Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. 1976 29,1014 66,630 Bay River, N. C.' 1950 44,382 49,627 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.1 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.1 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 - - Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C.' 1979 166,119 1,050,579 Edenton Harbor, N. C.1 1960 73,750 47,642 Far Creek, N. C.1 1985 164,642 1,181,904 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.', 2 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C.' 1982 477,2236 328,607 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 19283 4,802 247 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.' 1910 13,750 414 Roanoke River, N. C.' 1983' 404,584 550,364 Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 80,682 Shallotte River, N. C.' 1984 18,181 170,956 Smith Creek, Pamlico County, N. C.' 1984 113,273 36,387 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.' 1984 268,381 736,815 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.', S 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,221 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. 1984 911,099 182,725 Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 5. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N.C. 6-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-D For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report Project See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 1984 490,000 - Fort Macon Park, N. C. 1973 620,000 - 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, Harnett County, N. C.1 Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.1 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)"1 Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Core Creek, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.'1 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.'1 Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.','0 Gardners Creek, N. C.'1 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N. C.12 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.', 's Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.',' � New River, N. C.'1 New River, Onslow County, N. C.'1 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.'1 Ocracoke Island, N. C.' 3 Old Field Swamp, N. C.','10 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Reddies River Lake, N. C.' s 5 Roaring River Lake, N. C.' 5 Simmons Bay, N. C.'� South Creek, N. C.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C.',' � White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.'1 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. 1984 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1980 1984 1982 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1975 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1953 1961 1963 1983 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Reclassified to inactive category November 25, 1974. 14. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 15. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 16. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-27 475,574 283,846 572,1146 29,867 50,889 236,2239 394,055 223,413 138,1176 37,7773 374,005 54,5978 167,800 50,430 698,400 606,18916 430,151 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 129,592 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,367 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 64,769 67,821 214,286 3,013,18814 - - - - - 623,687 61,473 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. 1982 8 Sep. 812 219,477 - AIWW - Mooring Basins None 5 Aug. 77' - - AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut None 23 Sept. 86' - - Bodie Island, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' - - Cape Lookout, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' - - Conoho Creek, N. C. 1974 31 Mar. 782 79,782 - Contentnea Creek, N. C. 1972 31 Mar. 783 4,250 - Davis, N. C. 1982 31 Mar. 824 25,419 - Harbor of Refuge, N. C. 1934 1 Nov. 81' 1,396,653 - Hominy Swamp, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 107,472 - Hyde County Dike, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' - - MacKay Creek, N. C. 1976 31 Mar. 782 130,900 - Mann's Harbor, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 78' 7,265 - Mill Creek, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 116,395 - Mocassin Swamp, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 36,680 - Moyock Creek, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 64,416 - Nahunta Swamp, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 65,673 - Neuse River, N. C. None 31 Mar. 784 30,911 - Neuse River Barrier, N. C. None 5 Aug. 77' - - Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide None 5 Aug. 77' - - channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. None 5 Aug. 771 - - Rockfish Creek, N. C. 1976 31 Mar. 782 157,721 - Six Runs Creek, N. C. 1971 31 Mar. 782 64,977 - Sweetwater Creek, N. C. 1973 31 Mar. 782 64,584 - Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. 1976 31 Mar. 782 132,767 - Topsail Beach and None 5 Aug. 771 - - Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. 1974 11 Jan. 852 139,339 - Trent River, Basins and None 5 Aug. 771 - - Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 as amended. 6-28 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Rollinson Channel, N. C. June 1986 Shallotte River, N. C. September 1986 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C. September 1986 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Harkers Island Harbor,N. C. 19,524 Walters Slough, N. C. 11,241 White Oak River, N. C. 15,138 Wilmington Harbor, N. C. 7,500 6-29 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construe- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages 18. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 , 14 N.C. Randleman 2 Small reservoirs 21. Neuse River Falls 2 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange 24. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Basin, N.C.&S.C. 27. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Basin, Va. and N.C. 2 N.C. Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Leesville, Va. 9 Taber, Va. Melrose, Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Brookneal, Va. Chase City, Va. Spray, N.C. Danville, Va. Haw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin-Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 112 E 753,500 - 77,790,500 58,209,500 106 E 233,000 - 18,874,000 14,726,000 110 E 108,000 - 53,659,600 61,340,400 20 to 70 + E 923,000 - - - 92 E 335,620 - 72,767,800 90,232,200 81 CG,E 201,000 - - - 50 E 81,000 - - - 53 E 36,000 - - - 51 E 13,000 - - - 63 E 119,000 - - - 42 E 35,000 - - - 36 E 48,000 - - - 39 E 18,000 - - - 33 E 17,000 - - - 37 E 7,000 - - - 136 E 123,000 - - - 107 E 57,000 - - - 148 E 153,000 - 5,749,343 3,360,657 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 220 CG 1 1 249,800 14,000 13,933,000 1,157,000 108 CG,E 432,000 54,000 27,000,000 3,500,000 75 CG 59,300 83,000 31,300,000 800,000 244 CG 825,000 41,000 28,000,000 3,800,000 95 CG,E 76,900 20,000 9,100,000 1,000,000 54 CG 34,000 12,000 8,000,000 1,700,000 110 CG,E 120,000 43,000 17,700,000 6,000,000 147 CG,E 350,000 48,000 22,100,000 4,700,000 138 E, 163,000 15,000 9,000,000 1,100,000 126 CG,E 248,000 80,000 27,800,000 6,400,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,900,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $180,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $12,400,000 presently allocated to water supply and $18,600,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $61,171,000 presently allocated to water supply, $25,752,000 allocated to recreation and $5,077,000 to flood control. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key E - Earth CG - Concrete Gravity 136,000,000' 33,600,00012 115,000,00013 38,454,000 163,000,000' 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550:000 8,100,000 3,500,000 9,110,000 92,050,0005 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,000a 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 0 0 tD O0 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended TABLE 6-K (Preauthorization Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA 45 Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N. C. 1,913 Carolina Beach, N. C. 7,500 Carvins Creek, Roanoke, VA.' 30,920 Chapel Hill, N. C. 58,052 Crabtree Creek & Trib., Wake County, N. C. 134,267 Danville, Va. 11,083 Falling Creek, Rockingham, N. C.2 7,500 Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 36,550 Grifton, N. C. 7,500 Jordan Creek, Henry County, VA. 329 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N. C. 31,355 Peters Creek, Roanoke, VA. 35,465 Siler City Streams, N. C. 1,301 Soules Swamp, Whiteville, N. C. 1,506 1. Includes $7,500 reimbursement to the revolving fund. 2. Reimbursement to revolving fund. 6-31 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackay and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC ...................................... 7-2 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ................ 7-2 3 Charleston Harbor, SC ............................................ 7-2 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC .................... 7-3 5 Cooper River Seismic Modification Charleston Harbor, SC ....................................... 7-4 6 Folly River, SC ....................................................... 7-4 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC...........................................7-4 8 Little River Inlet, NC & SC .................................... 7-5 9 Murrells Inlet, SC....................................................7-5 10 Port Royal Harbor, SC ............................................ 7-6 11 Shipyard River, SC ................................................. 7-6 12 Town Creek, SC ...................................................... 7-7 13 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................. 7-7 14 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... 7-7 15 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.......7-7 Beach Erosion 16 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................................................. 7-7 17 Eagle Creek, SC ...................................................... 7-7 Flood Control Page 18 Scotts Creek, SC ..................................................... 7-7 19 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC ................ 7-8 20 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.....7-8 21 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... 7-8 22 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................................... 7-8 General Investigations 23 Active Investigations .............................................. 7-8 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ........................ 7-93 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ................................. 7-11 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects............7-15 Table 7-D Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 7-15 Table 7-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects ........................................ 7-15 Table 7-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... 7-16 Table 7-G Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 7-16 Table 7-H Active General Investigations.........................7-17 * All costs and financial statements for projects listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 7-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, US. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of the cost of field operations. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 40,000 acres, with the worst problems being in Lake Marion. During FY 864,441 acres of aquatic plants in 33 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp was purchased and stocked in 6 lakes having a total surface area of 622 acres. The cost of field operations in FY 86 was $527,734 and included $450,569 for the application of herbicides, $21,078 for the purchase and stocking of grass carp, $21,000 for aquatic plant surveys, and $35,087 for program management by the contractor. The cost of planning and contract administration was $57,891. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been $2,112,450 for new work. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts at Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island, and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredge between Winyah Bay and Charleston, S.C. during October 1985 - February 1986, removing 1,045,520 cubic yards at a total cost of $548,639. Bank stabilization costs for the Myrtle Beach, S.C. area were $971,990 and the mosquito abatement control contract costs were $46,292. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Winyah Bay to Little River area was $132,000. Costs of $823,295 were also incurred for contract dike management. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, water control management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $558,313. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,888 for new work and $44,985,220 for maintenance, for a total of $52,331,108. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S.C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via 7-2 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT Town Creek. Also, a ten foot depth by 110-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U.S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interest of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U.S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of Annual Report for 1962. The Phase I Design Memorandum stage of Advance Engineering and Design has been authorized for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, and deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date but are experiencing difficulty in securing disposal areas for dredged material for continued future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U.S. Navy Department has modern facilities for maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U.S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed in (a) the Lower Harbor by pipeline dredges during October 1985 - December 1985 removing 723,000 cubic yards of material, and (b) in the Anchorage Basin during October 1985 removing 460,000 cubic yards of material. Total FY86 costs paid for dredging was $2,986,518. Dike management costs were $838,031 including costs of Riverine Utility Craft operation of $24,071. Condition and operation studies, water control management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $750,471. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The existing project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $3,328,349 for new work and $90,878,598 for maintenance, a total cost of $94,206,947. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which traps sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to re-divert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,100 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the plan includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. Estimated cost of the project (1985) is $191,500,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 86 were $10,695 for lands and damages, $24,258 for relocations, $5,050,454 for power plant, $3,358 for fish and wildlife facilities contract, $83,282 7-3 C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 for generators, $8,055 for governors, $30,869 for cooling water facilities - general construction, $9,172 for buildings, grounds and utilities, and $7,048 for cultural resources preservation. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $577,573. Maintenance: Funds of $3,349,732 were spent for maintenance of completed work and included $1,443,185 paid to the South Carolina Public Service Authority for power losses incurred as a result of this project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed at the end of FY 74. The General Design Memorandum was completed in January 1972 and work is proceeding on schedule on other phases of the project. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 99% complete. The power-on-line date was March 1985. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $189,334,474 for new work and $5,786,740 for maintenance, a total of $195,121,214. 5. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION Location. The Cooper River Seismic Project is located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, about 50 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina. Existing project. The Santee-Cooper Project was, constructed in the early 1940's using the latest state-of-the-art design for that time. The project is currently licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as project No. 199. The FERC requires that the project receive independent inspections at least once every five years. It was during the 1977 inspection that the seismic deficiency of both the West and North Dams was noted. This was confirmed again in the 1982 inspection. As a result of studying the possible consequences of the loss of both dams, the S.C. Congressional Delegation introduced legislation which was approved in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act to provide $2 million for design and $20 million for construction of remedial measures. The design and construction responsibility was assigned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps began to study various alternatives to provide remedial measures for the liquifiable foundation of the West Dam in August 1983. Current estimated cost of the project is $22,000,000, all Federal. Local cooperation. None required. Condition at end of fiscal year. In June 1986, a conceptual design was submitted to FERC for approval and was subsequently rejected by FERC. By the end of FY 86, another conceptual design was submitted to FERC, and this time was approved. Currently, a preliminary design is underway with borrow area exploration and dewatering design the major work items. This project could be ready for contract award at the end of Fiscal Year 1987. 6. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U.S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the entrance bar by the sidecaster dredge, Merritt, removing 34,867 cubic yards at a cost of $145,625, (b) costs on Folly River for FY 1985 of $153,189. Condition and operations studies, water control management, engineering and design, and supervision nd administration costs were $26,977. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $1,170,479 for maintenance, a total of $1,508,215. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U.S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet 7-4 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosoted-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the Sampit River from October 1985 - January 1986 and June - September 1986 removing a total of 1,761,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,292,745. Contract dike management costs were $637,314. Water control management, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $333,907. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 04. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $42,831,267 for maintenance, a total of $47,447,170. 8. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina - South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N.C. to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs of $437 were incurred. Maintenance: A 5-year monitoring program was initiated in 1981 to provide information for management of the project and to determine the effect of the project on nearby coastal areas. Charleston District collects the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. Following conclusion of the initial 5-year monitoring plan (February 1986), CERC presented results of their preliminary analysis to SAC and SAD at a meeting in Charleston on 8 April 1986. The data indicated that coastal processes in the vicinity of the inlet have not reached an equilibrium condition and recommended continued monitoring at a reduced level. Condition and operation studies, water control management, and supervision and administration costs were $94,771. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. The project was completed in FY 1984. Federal costs for the existing project were $17,037,428 for new work and $2,221,216 for maintenance, a total of $19,258,644. 9. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel will be stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. A letter of intent to provide local cooperation dated 4 November 1975 has been received from the Georgetown County Board of Commissioners. Local interests have met their responsibilities to date. 7-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs of $-24 were incurred. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging performed. A monitoring program was initiated in April 1978 to provide site specific information for proper management of the project and to provide data on coastal response to the project. Charleston District collects most of the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. The monitoring program has been adjusted several times based on CERC recommendations. Currently the program includes daily littoral environmental observations (LEO), annual aerial photography, jetty surveys and site inspections, semi-annual surveys of beaches and the deposition basis. Channel surveys are not scheduled but are conducted on an "as needed" basis. Results of the monitoring program have led to recommendations for dredging the deposition basin, nourishment of a reach of eroded beach at North Litchfield Beach and erosion protection of a section of the south jetty sand dike. This maintenance work is scheduled for completion during FY 1987. Condition and operation studies, water control management costs and supervision and administration costs were $103,438. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $13,407,123 for new work and $1,088,770 for maintenance, a total of $14,495,893. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 47 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modemrn terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed in August and September 1986 removing 872,895 cubic yards of material at a cost of $768,800. Condition and operations studies, water quality management, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $127,386. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and $6,806,408 for maintenance, a total of $8,592,508. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River about threefourths mile above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to Macalloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is Macalloy Corporation's wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance diking costs of $86,018 were incurred for material removed during FY 1986. Condition and operations studies, water control management, supervision and administration, and engineering and design costs were $21,682. 7-6 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $8,887,384 for maintenance for a total of $9,375,208. 12. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S.C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging performed by the Schweizer resulted in costs of $493,155. Condition and operations studies, water control management, engineering and design, supervision and administration costs were $32,087. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $2,214,394 for maintenance, a total of $2,433,915. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $1,712 were incurred for condition surveys, all on Waccamaw River, S.C. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization) and Section 111, Public Law 90-433, as amended. (See Table 7-D.) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) None BEACH EROSION 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) FLOOD CONTROL 17. EAGLE CREEK, S.C. Location. The Eagle Creek Project is located entirely within the limits of Dorchester County, South Carolina. The creek flows from its headwaters in the subdivisions near Summerville to the Ashley River. Existing project. The authorized project consists of clearing and channel excavation of approximately four miles of Chandler Bridge Creek and Eagle Creek. The project was authorized under general authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations and highway bridge alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvement will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract was awarded on 28 September 1983 in the amount of $1,245,063. Construction period was 646 calendar days. Work on the Eagle Creek Project was completed in December 1985. Upon completion and acceptance of the work, responsibility for operating and maintaining the project was turned over to the local sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project included in Completed Flood Control Projects Inventory for Inspection. 18. SCOTTS CREEK, S.C. Location. Scotts Creek is located entirely within the limits of Newberry County, South Carolina. The authorized project is located within the corporate limits of the City of Newberry, South Carolina. 7-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing Project. The authorized project consists of channel excavation and bank stabilization of 1.05 miles of the creek. The project extends from approximately 500 feet downstream of the crossing of O'Neal Street to the crossing of Nance Street. The project was authorized on 14 November 1975 under general authorities contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, highway bridge alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvements will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded on 14 May 1986 in the amount of $334,584.40. The construction period for this contract is 270 calendar days. At the close of the fiscal year, the contractor had earned $57,000. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project was approximately 20% complete when a severe storm event occurred. This event caused substantial amounts of damage to all works installed at the time and generated shoaling in the channel. Work was stopped after the event, while Engineering Division could evaluate the impact of the storm and revise the plans and specifications in view of the new configuration the stream assumed as a result of the storm. 19. COOPER RIVER, POMPION HILL CHAPEL, S.C. Location. This project is located entirely within Berkeley County, South Carolina, near the city of Charleston. Existing project. The authorized project consists of bank stabilization of approximately 200 feet of bank on the East Branch of the Cooper River. The project is adjacent to the Pompion Hill Chapel. The project was authorized on 23 July 1986 under general authorities contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way as necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; and prevent future encroachments. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded on 24 September 1986 in the amount of $169,950.00. The construction period for this contract is 75 calendar days. The contractor has not started work prior to the close of the fiscal year. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. No work has begun prior to the end of the fiscal year. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period: Eagle Creek, S.C., Sawmill Branch, S.C. and Cow Castle Creek, S.C. The following projects will be inspected during FY 87: Cowpens Swamp, S.C., Crabtree Swamp, S.C., Gapway Swamp, S.C., Simpson Creek, S.C., Todd Swamp, S.C., Buck Creek, S.C. and N.C., Edisto River, S.C., Shot Pouch Creek, S.C., Turkey Creek, S.C., Kingstree Branch, S.C., and Wilson Branch, S.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $8,238. 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-F.) 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-G.) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). (See Table 7-G.) Federal costs for FY 1985 were $169,405 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies and $184,717 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 23. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-H which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-8 CHARLESTON, S.C, DISTRICT TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. Total Cost to in Text Project 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 5 Cooper River Seismic Modification, Chas Hbr, SC 6 Folly River, SC 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC 8 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (RegularFunds) (Contributed Funds) Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 New Work: Approp. 186,000 196,000 658,000 638,000 Cost 190,974 193,631 657,623 585,625 Approp. -- -- -- -- Cost -- -- -- -- New Work: Approp. -- -- -- -- Cost -- -- -- -- Maint: Approp. 1,742,000 2,055,000 3,224,700 3,024,000 Cost 2,109,254 2,099,453 3,251,183 3,080,530 New Work: Approp. -- -- -- -- Cost -- -- -- -- Maint: Approp. 3,921,200 4,796,500 5,366,000 4,476,000 Cost 2,710,142 6,994,476 5,201,014 4,575,020 New Work: Approp. 26,563,000 11,270,000 12,910,000 4,700,000 Cost 29,835,958 11,657,195 11,336,085 5,804,764 Maint: Approp. 295,000 480,000 2,556,000 2,948,000 Cost 85,345 511,898 1,839,765 3,349,732 New Work: Approp. 100,000 1,300,000 900,000 198,000 Cost 39,925 1,174,744 894,513 233,086 Maint: Approp. -- -- -- -- Cost -- -- -- -- New Work: Approp. -- -- -- -- Cost -- -- -- -- Maint: Approp. 152,000 110,000 259,000 334,000 Cost 20,776 250,173 257,359 325,791 New Work: Approp. -- -- -- -- Cost -- -- -- -- Maint: Approp. 1,315,400 1,945,000 1,796,500 3,242,000 Cost 1,490,161 2,495,612 1,814,224 3,263,966 New Work: Approp. 5,800,000 331,000 -- -33,000 Cost 5,300,996 863,027 -29,255 437 Maint: Approp. 585,000 -180,000 78,552 87,000 Cost 24,988 344,186 124,428 94,771 New Work: Approp. 640,000 -- 31,920 0 Cost 499,994 140,000 31,927 0 Sept. 30,1986 2,167,605 2,112,450 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 1 7,455,378 1 45,092,004 2 45,054,642 2 10,165,564 3 10,165,564 3 91,280,587 4 91,115,055 4 191,482,583 189,334,474 6,279,000 5,786,740 2,498,000 2,341,918 -- 337,736 337,736 1,188,000 1,170,479 7,061,755 5 7,061,755 6 42,993,780 6 42,945,823 6 17,037,428 17,037,428 2,225,676 2,221,216 1,521,920 1,521,920 7-8 TABLE 7-A (Cont'd) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, US. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30,1986 9 Murrells Inlet, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10 Port Royal Harbor, SC 11 Shipyard River, SC 12 Town Creek, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17 Eagle Creek, SC 18 Scott's Creek, SC 19 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 32,452 99,637 12,758 104,225 38,647 4,127 -24 78,000 107,600 83,886 103,438 13,419,240 13,407,123 1,380,000 1,379,148 1,166,169 7 1,155,770 7 -- 1,786,100 -- 1,786,100 -- 8,000 892,000 -- 3,814 896,186 316,000 15,000 691,000 106,000 65,943 420,227 707,639 107,700 280,000 243,580 1,258,000 12,222 -- 345,000 420,739 -- 178,000 -2,201 --.-- 325,000 525,242 114,000 166,000 -193,540 726,549 624,586 -11,817 -- 326,000 -- 114,511 -- 46,100 -- 14,594 6,806,408 6,806,408 491,974 8 491,974 8 8,892,192 8,887,384 219,521 219,521 8,600 8,600 2,229,000 2,214,394 1,561,832 9 1,561,832 9 326,000 114,511 46,100 14,594 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $6,586,455 for previous projects. $3,328,349 for the existing project, and $250,760 forPhase Ito deepen harbor. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance ofprevious projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 5 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 7 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L 79-11 incurred through FY73. 8 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 9 Includes $1,192,914 jobs bill money. 7-10 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sep. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 1 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 2 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 2 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC (See Section 1 of text.) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (See Section 2 of text.) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bah. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S.C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S.C. 4 CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 3 of text.) 2 jetties. s Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918. (40 Stat. L 723). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. Sec. 302, 1965 Rivers and Harbors Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Annual Report, 18 8 9 , p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st seas. 3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572 H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 7-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 7-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S.C. (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) (See Section 4 of text.) Redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of.SLt. Stephens, S.C. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATON, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 5 of text.) Install a closure structure in the diversion canal between Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie and construct such measures as necessary to improve the seismic stability of the Pinopolis West Dam on the Cooper River. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. (See Section 6 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGEIOWN HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 7 of text.) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a tuming basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. River and Harbor Act of 1968, S.D. 88, 90th Cong. H.D. 3069, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 395, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 7-12 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Comm. on Public Works on Nov. 18, PL 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974 R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 2 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. (See Section 8 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permnit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. (See Section 9 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as of Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 10 of text.) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, S.C.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the S.C. State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. (See Section 11 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburg Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a tuming basin at the upper end. P.L 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. P.L 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. River and Harbor Act, H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 7-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, US. ARMY 1986 TABLE 7-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TOWN CREEK, S.C. (See Section 12 of text.) Auth. by Chief of Engrs. An entrance chanel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide Detailed Project Repoit on Feb. 12, 1974 under across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a Auth. of Sec. 107 of channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of R&H Act of 1960, as Five Fathom Creek to the AIWW, a distance of 6.2 miles. amended. EAGLE CREEK, S.C. (See Section 17 of text.) Auth. under Sec. 205, of the Provides for clearing and channel excavation of Detailed Project Report. 1948 Flood Control Act, four miles of Chandler Bridge Creek and as amended. Eagle Creek. SCOTTS CREEK, SC. (See Section 18 of text.) Auth. under Sec. 205 of the Provides for clearing and channel excavation of Detailed Project Report. 1948 Flood Control Act, 1.05 miles of channel. as amended. COOPER RIVER, POMPION HILL CHAPEL, S.C. (See Section 19 of text.) Auth. under Sec. 14 of the Provides for bank protection of the Pompion Hill Chapel. Letter Report 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. 1 Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2 Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3 Contains latest published maps. 4 Inactive. 5 Completed under previous projects. 6 For national defense. 7-14 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, S.C. 1 1978 $125,697 $ 18,280 Aquatic Plant Control, N.C. and S.C. 1 5 1968 '379,680 - - Archers Creek, S.C. 1914 20,646 - - Ashley River, S.C. 1 1955 260,996 530,852 Edisto River, S.C. 1 2 1938 33,103 900 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. 1 3 1950 183,712 269,673 Jeremy Creek, S.C. 1 1985 49,987 3,000 Mingo Creek, S.C. 1 2 1950 29,050 7,150 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. 1 1982 9,500 84,170 Salkahatchie River, S.C. 1 2 4 1896 15,841 - - Santee River, N.C. and S.C. 1 1950 99,750 180,633 Village Creek, S.C. 1985 26,500 105,116 Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C. 1 1978 262,814 278,170 Wateree River, S.C. 1940 60,000 151,784 1 Completed 4 Abandonment recommended in 1926 2 No commerce reported (H.D. , 69th Cong., 1st session) 3 Curtailment recommended in 1926 5 Pilot Program (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session) TABLE 7-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 15 of Text) Study Identifications Section Fiscal Year Costs Calabash Creek, N.C. 107 $ 39,660 Charleston Harbor, S.C. 111 106,268 TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report for Construction Maintenance Hunting Island Beach, S.C. 1984 $2,872,717 1- 1 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, US. ARMY 1986 TABLE 7-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, N.C. & S.C. 1 2 1970 $298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, S.C. 1 2 1985 250,000 - - Cowpens Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1969 97,000 - - Edisto River, S.C. 1 3 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. 1 2 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C. 1 2 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, S.C. 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C. 1 1978 247,242 - - Leith's Creek, S.C. 1 2 1982 430,951 - - Reddies River Lake, N.C. 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, S.C. 1 3 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, N.C. 1 4 1978 370,000 - - Saluda River, S.C. 1 2 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, S.C. 1 2 1971 248,605 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., S.C. 1 2 1971 77,400 - - Simpson Creek, S.C. 1 2 1957 81,000 -- Todd Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1974 319,669 -- Wilson Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1985 277,111 -- 1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 3 Discontinued due to lack of interest 2 Completed 4 Phase I only TABLE 7-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies (See Section 22 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Brushy Creek, Greenville, S.C. 205 33,226 Camp Branch/Lynches Lake, Lake City, S.C. 205 63,240 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, S.C. 205 24,392 Devils Ditch, Richland County, S.C. 205 25,527 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, S.C. 205 22,583 Lawsons Fork, Spartanburg, S.C. 205 31,704 Sawmill Branch, S.C. 205 7,457 Socastee Creek, Horry County, S.C. 205 73,341 Stoop Creek, S.C. 205 17,490 7-16 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT TABLE 7-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Gills Creek, S.C. $ 199,097 Little Pee Dee & Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. & S.C. 16,797 Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. & S.C. 38,932 SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) Myrtle Beach, S.C. $ 53,912 REVIEW OF AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (CATEGORY 160) $ 12,319 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 48,423 FERC Licensing Activities 9,886 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS $ 3,503 Planning Assistance to States 77,210 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTHORIZATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 190) TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 460,079 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) $ 255,144 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies 3,083 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $ 258,227 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (CATEGORY 400) Charleston Harbor Deepening, S.C. $ 477,414 TOTAL (CATEGORY 400) $ 477,414 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 1,195,720 7-17 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and dumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the AtlantLc Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, a considerable portion of western South Cacolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, ....................... 2. Aquatic Plant Control .......... 3. Atlantic Intracostal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) .... 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA .......... 5. Savannah Harbor, GA .......... 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .................. 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...................... 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................. Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization 11. Tybee Island, GA .............. Flood Control 12. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, SC ........................... 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 15. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. Page 8-1 8-2 8-2 8-3 8-4 8-5 8-6 8-6 8-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 16. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC ....................... 16A. Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC ..... 16B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC ....... 16C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) ....... 17. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and AL ......... General Investigations 18. Surveys ........................ 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 20. Research and Development ..... 21. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............... Tables 8-6 Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ... Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation .... Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 8-7 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 8-7 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes ...... 8-7 Page 8-8 8-8 8-8 8-9 8-9 8-9 8-10 8-10 8-10 8-11 8-12 8-16 8-16 8-17 8-7 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These Rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey map of Georgia.) For full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For further details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth 8-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth, so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles, the lower 139 miles of the Oconee River, and the lower 199 miles of the Ocmulgee River. The Altamaha River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet, above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet, above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents: Altamaha River, House Executive Document 283, Fifty-first Congress, second session; Oconee River, House Executive Document 211, Fifty-first Congress, first session; Ocmulgee River, House Executive Document 215, Fifty-first Congress, first session; and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, House Document 610, Seventy-seventh Congress, second session. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance was performed during the fiscal year. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. To September 30, 1986, costs under the existing project were $60,847 for new work and 1,871,703 for maintenance, of which $69,356 were contributed funds, a total of $1,932,550. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-C for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 30 percent of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestations in Lakes Jackson, Blackshear, and Worth Actual control work under the Aquatic Plant Control Cost Sharing Program with the Georgia Game and Fish Division was initiated in FY 86 and over 800 acres were treated. Cost during the fiscal year was $58,950. The Final Environmental Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL (See NOAA charts 11489 - 11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838 - 841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL.) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope GA. Mean tidal 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; is from 6to8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet, due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive of adequate terminal facilities at ports of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded on July 3, 1985. As reported in the FY 85 Annual Report, some dredging occurred in FY 85. In FY 86 the dredge Clarendon continued in the South River from Oct 1 to Oct 3,1985 where it removed 25,001 cubic yards of material. From Oct 4 to Oct 14, 1985, it continued dredging in Little Mud River, removing 226,000 cubic yards. The next area was Altamaha Sound where 70,490 cubic yards were removed from Oct 13 to Oct 23, 1985. Also work was done in Buttermilk Sound where from Oct 24 thru Nov 10, 1985 the dredge pumped 182,538 cubic yards of disposal material. The final area under this contract was Jekyll Creek which was completed on Dec 2, 1985 after removing 420,141 cubic yards of disposal material. The expenditures for the dredging and pile dike removal were $355,595. Total cost including inspection, administration, and other government cost was $282,977. The government cost for surveys and inspection reports, and condition and operation studies amounted to $113,605. Total cost for the fiscal year amounted to $752,177. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay River near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished after construction of the new bridges for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976 Costs of the existing completed project to September 30, 1986, were $763,599 for new work and $16,397,230 for maintenance, a total of $17,160,829. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Academy Creek; a channel in Back River 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the city of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For furtherdetails see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 2,553,009 cubic yards of disposal material was removed by dredges in FY 86. From 1 Dec 85 thru 2 Jan 86 the government dredge McFarland removed 534,253 cubic yards from the entrance channel. The dredge Stuyvesant also worked in the entrance channel from 15 Feb 86 to 28 Mar 86 removing a total of 1,426,591 cubic yards of material. From 1 May 86 thru 22 May 86 the dredge Cherokee dredged 1,426,591 cubic yards from the East River and the dredge Jim Bean removed 282,047 cubic yards between 22 May 86 and 23 Jun 86 in the Turtle River. Expenditures for surveys totaled $184,784, for dikes and dredging, and $7,148,896for S&I. Other expenditures included $33,115 for depot operations and project management totaling $62,185; $390,003 for E&D; and $108,207 for mosquito control. 8-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $8,110,481. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3,1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the fiscal year. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1986, were $58,809,666, of which $3,929,968 was for new work and $54,879,698 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston Harbor, SC, and 70 statute miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal); and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet wide by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; adrainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a com-bined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet with water depths alongside ranging up to 38 feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1962. Maintenance: Three dredges operated in the harbor in FY 86. From 6 Mar 86 thru 8 Jun 86 the Cherokee removed 516,621 cubic yards between stations 100+730 and 82+750. The Hendry #5 worked between stations 24+160 and 40+000 as well as the sediment basin to remove the bulk of the material in the harbor which totaled 3,984,560 cubic yards. The third dredge, Atkinson, from 10 Aug 86 thru 31 Sep 86 removed 361,000 cubic yards between stations 79+000 and 40+000. We received credits of 366,689 on one 1984 contract and one 1985 contract. Also payment of work completed in FY 85, was not actually paid until 1986. Total cubic yardage in FY 86 was 4,862,181. 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $241,518. (Credits received from agitation dredging of private shipping interest slips amounted to $126,225.) Distribution of Engineer Yard cost amounted to $116,268. Condition surveys, water quality monitoring, water and air pollution studies, environmental studies, testing, inspection and reports, tidegate operation, and government supervision and administration costs were $1,191,097. Credits of $166,690 and $199,999 were received for dredging contracts on the upper channel bend wideners and lower channel respectively. Net dredging expenditures were 2,222,023. Total operation and maintenance costs for the fiscal year amounted to $3,528,413. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. Costs of existing project to September 30, 1986, were $181,362,982, of which $38,925,359 was for new work and $142,437,623 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between the two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, overhanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at miles 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9-foot channel (September 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a State port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance and operation of the New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam and its recreational area, which accommodated 504,972 visitors, amounted to $550,825. Activity during the year included lock and dam operations totaling $117,275. Costs to repair the South Carolina pier was $58,385 and remoting and rehabilitation of the lock totaled $48,765. Hydrology surveys cost $16,782 and district office support $1,769. Operation of the recreation area and facilities including the cleanup contract totaled $146,002 with additional maintenance costs of $161,525. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. Costs of the existing project to September 30, 1986, were $22,676,139 of which $6,646,551 was for new work and $16,029,588 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) No dredging, snagging, or repair of pile dikes and revetment was performed in FY 86. 8-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed project condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: Savannah Harbor - - monthly Brunswick Harbor - - monthly AIWW -- 14-20 Aug. 86, 29 Apr -8 May 86, 20-25 Feb. 86, 18-20 Nov 85 Savannah River Below Augusta - - 11-13 Feb 86 and 25-28 Aug 86 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Costs for preauthorization studies and project construction totaled $226,251. Plans and specifications on Bellville Point, GA, were prepared in January 1986 and the project was constructed in April 1986 at a cost of $182,302. Costs for BelIville totaled $217,132. The Valona, GA, detailed project study was inactive in FY 86 except for some coordination work. TheAlWWat Brunswick required $7,3700of coordination activity. Beach Erosion Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION A reconnaissance investigation was initiated on the shoreline erosion problems at Crooked River State Park, GA, at an FY 85 cost of $27,404. 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA (See NOAA Charts 11512,11513 and 11509, formerly U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in H.D. 92-105, 92d Cong.) The only portion of the island that has been developed in bounded on the north by th south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has had a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional, intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified and now calls for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute cash the required percentage of the first cost, including costsforconstruction, engineering, and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, ease-ments, rights-of way; and relocations; of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers, presently estimated at 51.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction, maintenance, and nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT administer it for public use during the life of the project; and provided further, that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from 1st Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with CEQ on November 13,1973. The initial construction contract for the terminal groin was awarded September 13, 1974 in the amount of $980,642. The groin was completed and formally accepted on June 17, 1975. The second contract, for initial beach fill and advance nourishment, was awarded June 18,1975 in the amount of $2,175,000. This resulted in the placement of 2.3 million cubic yards of sandfill along most of the entire length (13,300 feet) of ocean beach front. The sand was removed by hydraulic pipeline dredge from a massive sandbar borrow area off the south end of Tybee Island. Completed in March 1976, the project provides approximately 124 feet of beach seaward of the seawall (accessible at average high tide), doubling the public beach area. Erosion has occurred along the beach front. Results of prior years beach monitoring indicate a decreasing or stabilizing erosion rate. The southernmost section south of 13th Street has experienced the most critical erosion. Total project cost is estimated to be $8,700,000, which includes $4,449,800 in non-Federal, contributed funds. Costs to date of existing project were $3,126,541 (Federal funds) and $2,128,850 (contributed funds). (See Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.) Flood Control 12. BROADWAY LAKE, ANDERSON COUNTY, SC Location. The Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Existing project. The authorization provides for the of Engineers to undertake a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from an existing lake known as Broadway Lake, owned by Anderson County, South Carolina. This lake has a surface area of about 1 square mile and a tributary area of about 44 square miles with an existing dam and concrete spillway. The spillway is 50 feet wide, about 19 feet high, and flanked by an earth on the west side. The total length of the dam is about 610 The National Dam Safety Inspection Program determined that the dam did not meet the safety criteria. Since the repairs of the dam, spillway, and low-level outlet are not the authority of the demonstration project, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will withhold implementation of the project pending repairs to the dam by State or local authorities. Local cooperation. The local interests are now making the necessary repairs to the dam. Local interests have expressed a willingness to provide necessary easements, and rights-of-way for removal of silt and aquatic weeds, as well as provide lands for disposal areas. They will be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. The United States should be relieved of any liability due to dam failure from construction activity in the lake. The local assurer is Anderson County Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is inactive, pending completion of repairs to the dam by local interest. The Detailed Project Report was returned for the District to notify appropriate interests that the Corps can no longer participate in primarily recreation projects. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Physical inspections of Dunn Branch, Augusta and Macon levees, and Peacock Creek were completed during the fiscal year. The total cost of the fiscal year amounted to $21,646. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization studies). Preauthorization studies continued through FY 86 on Federal Prison Creek, GA; Placentia Canal, GA; and Springfield Canal, GA. The DPR on Federal Prison Creek continued at a FY cost of $20,104. Placentia Canal DPR continued at a FY cost of $124,778. Detailed project studies continued in FY 86 on Springfield Canal at a cost of $87,078. The total cost for preauthorization studies in FY 86 was $231,960. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work, (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency planning, inspection, supplies, emergency operations, and exercises costs were $620,901. 8-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 16. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on Savannah River and its tributaries in Georgia and South Carolina. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin for flood control and other purposes (H.D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the Clarks Hill Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Trotters Shoals which will replace Goat Island and Middleton Shoals was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. Clarks Hill and Hartwell Lakes are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes at end of chapter.) Duke Power Company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry - Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on Clarks Hill, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) Lake follow. Local cooperation. None required. 16A. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Clarks Hill Lake is located at mile 237.7 on Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and South Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Clarks Hill Dam and Lake, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet, and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet, and on the east side by a similar embank-ment of 1,329 feet. Total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. At maximum power pool elevation 330, the lake covers 70,000 acres. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,045,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts, with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of recreational activities during the period from Construction General funds (Code 710) amounted to $1,655. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 442,395,200 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented were zero due to the drought. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $6,288,836..The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on Clarks Hill Lake Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18,1981 Federal Register. Visitation to the project in FY 86 was 7,645,698 persons. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure, 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum power pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control 293,000 acre-feet; hydroelectric power 1,416,000 acre-feet; and dead storage 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000- kilowatt generators having generating capacity of 264,000 kilo-watts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000-kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capactiy to 344,000 kilowatts. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Cost of activities during the fiscal year amounted to $6,208,293. An additional $281,828 was expended from (Code 713) for cost sharing at the 1-85 Destination Park. 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT The fiscal year upper diversion dam rehabilitation cost amounted to $138,899. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 306,208,100 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented were zero due to the drought. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $6,208,293. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register August 21, 1978. Approximately 13,127,667 persons visited the lake in FY 86 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 16C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC, (FORMERLY TROTTERS SHOALS LAKE, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam and about 37.4 miles above Clarks Hill Dam. (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Engineers at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. The latest approved (FY 86) cost estimate for the project is $545,000,000, of which $435,856,000 is for construction, $28,465,000 for lands and damages, $4,683,000 is for cultural resources, and $75,996,000 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Approval was received January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A notice of availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement covering pumped storage was published in the Federal Register February 18, 1977, and October 26, 1979. A notice of availability on the Final Supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement on Fish and Wildlife Mitigation for the Russell project appeared in the Federal Register on December 11, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts were awarded during FY 86 as follows: (1) Miscellaneous crane and debris removal work $182,237; (2) Modify tainter Gates opening time $281,697; (3) Complete visitor display areas for the powerhouse and natural resources management center $317,000; (4) Supply liquid oxygen and cryogenic equipment O&M $668,900 (5) Repair earth embankment $128,110; (6) Supply generators and motors for pump storage $13,860,700; (7) Structural modifications to under-water oxygen distribution system $1,075,000. Other FY 87 projects to be awarded include: (1) Downstream tailrace rock removal excavation contract; (2) Complete miscellaneous projects finish non-critical powerhouse modifications; (3) Supply liquid oxygen for calendar years 1987,1988,1989; (4) Install an alarm system for the oxygenation facility; (5) Landscape project for exterior area of the powerhouse; (6) complete relocation of SCL railroad site R-3; (7) Phase II Georgia recreation areas; (8) Construct operational and administrative roads. Remaining pump storage contract awards are scheduled for FY 87 awards are as follows; (1) Switchgear Nov. 1986; (2) Transformer Dec 86; (3) Main control board Feb 87; (4) Governor Mar 87. The general construction contract for pump storage is approximately 50% complete and is scheduled for a 2nd quarter FY 88. Continued water quality monitoring by Waterways Experiment Station is approved to extend their contract thru FY 92. Fish entrainment studies relating to future pumpback were initiated in FY 84, with basic Phase I study and conceptual protection system design completed in early FY 85. An intensive fishery data collection effort is ongoing. In FY 86, 293,857,000 kilowatts of power were generated. Maintenance: The operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $3,233,598. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is 79 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1986, were $434,764,323 of which $426,800,000 is for new work and $7,964,323 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 17. WEST POINT LAKE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER The West Point Lake located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H. D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by Savannah District for Mobile District. For complete information see Mobile District. General Investigation 18. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,678,239, of which $444,647 was for navigation studies; $724,103forflood control studies; $71,844 for special investigations; and $64,044 for coor-dination with other agencies, and $2,912 for coordinating FERC Licenses. 8-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work continued underthe Flood Plain management Services on the compilation of flood information, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities were as follows: flood plain management services, $81,049; and technical services, $97,034. Flood plain management services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of Executive Order 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. Early in FY 86 the Flood Plain Management Services Branch began the Coastal Georgia Hurricane Evacuation Study. This study is a three year joint effort of the State of Georgia, local officials, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Corps of Engineers. Funds available for the study in FY 86 was $285,000 of which $100,000 came from Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Management Program funds. In FY 86 $29,434 was expended. The cost for hydrologic studies was $13,666. The total fiscal year cost for collection and study of basic data was $178,083. 20. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. 21. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Continuation of Planning and Engineering (CP&E) for the Savannah Harbor Widening Project was completed in FY 85 with the expenditure of $73,887 to complete the ship simulator study. The CP&E expenditures were $887,742. Plans and specifications were begun with FY 86 expenditures of $259,883. The recommended plan provides for modification of the harbor by widening the navigation channel between the present upstream limit of the 500-foot channel (Fig Island Turning Basin) and the Kings Island Turning Basin from 400 to 500 feet. This will decrease the hazard of handling large vessels and reduce shipping transit time. In FY 86, the Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam Study continued under Continuation of Planning and Engineering. The cost amounted to $877,791. The recommended project is the construction of a reregulation dam on the Chattahoochee River, 6.3 miles downriver of Buford Dam. Project benefits are hydropower and water supply. Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood waters from an urban area of Augusta, Georgia. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, State and local governmental agencies with no environmental opposition. The local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. The plant consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, modifications of bridges and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consists of preparation of a General Design Memorandum estimated to cost about $780,000 and was completed in September 1986. FY 86 expenditures were $195,046. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding Total Cost to FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. Altamaha, Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H ACT) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. Johns River, FL 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA 5. Savannah Harbor, GA 6. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 11. Tybee Island, GA 12. Broadway Lake, SC 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 16.A Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 191 - 4,000 269 46 40,000 9,000 30,000 50,000 36,731 11,488 11,433 58,950 75,000 934,000 1,088,000 481,164 914,900 950,290 608,000 752,177 3,491,000 8,636,350 1,800,000 8,101,443 5,221,253 9,605,206 1,896,159 8,110,481 -319,000 -112,480 9,418,000 6,986,914 4,207,000 10,238,200 3,635,000 8,049,868 10,084,654 3,528,413 348,000 672,000 804,000 543,000 171,452 884,597 759,000 550,830 4,542 - 386,949 1,053,000 - 307,887 209,486 85,000 13,000 -15,000 18,500 4,731 59,775 15,387 29,646 1,050,000 593,200 6,397,700 5,629,293 932,843 5,612 - 5,612 - 6,673,800 7,554,000 6,386,000 7,040,063 7,746,130 6,288,836 821,4571 821,4571 1,917,98223 1,914,2972,3 341,159 327,507 958,0964 958,0964 16,556,9215 16,532,0285 4,573,6086 4,573,4336 55,036,894' 54,934,112 46,187,7218 46,185,7438 143,091,1409 142,736,5179 6,740,03110 6,740,03110 16,120,492 16,029,588 3,970,24913 3,126,54113 99,000 99,000 184,018 183,731 84,841,2901 84,840,26311 69,095,35415 68,318,86615 8-11 - " w REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 16B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC 16C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,334,000 -450,000 4,489,519 1,282,815 270,000 -35,000 213,815 355,807 4,411,359 4,803,000 6,986,600 4,938,210 5,031,036 6,863,402 1,700,000 1,450,000 1,893,576 2,463,415 -100,000 138,899 6,404,500 6,208,294 69,000 82,425 78,469,000 36,300,000 21,400,000 9,310,000 77,939,501 35,491,655 22,368,222 7,217,141 396,000 1,231,300 2,870,000 3,734,000 371,132 1,005,621 3,055,270 3,233,598 115,871,3071214 115,745,7351214 62,297,72616 61,566,05216 6,619,000 6,552,924 426,799,509 423,876,970 8,559,300 7,964,325 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,798 for previous projects. Does not include 35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY 86. 6. Includes $643,465 for previous projects and includes $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects. Includes $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Excludes funds contributed by Brunswick and Ga. Port Authorities. Also includes $2,150,000 under '83 Job Bill Act. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects. Does include $855,941 contributed funds. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects. Includes $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZI 11. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,556,958 has been expended. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the '83 Job Bill Act. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,835,286 has been expended. Also includes $545,000 expended under the '83 Job Bill Act. 13. Does not include $2,128,850 contributed funds. 14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,481,215 has been expended. 15. Includes $316,760 under special recreation use fees. Also includes $736,000 under the '83 Job Bill Act. 16. Includes $576,019 expended special recreation use fees. ING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 and March 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA. Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. HD 443, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. HD 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 8-12 See Section in Text Project Funding " v SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) See Section in Text AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) 3. June 3, 1896 Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Savannah, Ga. Route No. 2 adopted. Mar. 3, 1899 Route No. 1 adopted. July 13, 1892 Section from Savannah, Ga. to Fernandina, Fla. Original 7-foot channel. Mar. 3, 1905 Provided for Skidaway Narrows. July 25, 1912 Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Aug. 8, 1917 Section fromm Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. to St. Johns River, Fla. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, S.C. and St. Johns River, Fla." Mar. 2, 1919 Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Mar. 2, 1919 Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. July 3, 1930 Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. Aug. 26, 1937 A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. Aug. 26, 1937 A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. June 20, 1938 A 12-foot channel between Savannah, Ga., and Fernandina, Fla., various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, Ga. Mar. 2, 1945 An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, Ga., not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Oct. 15, 1981 Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA 4. Mar. 3, 1879 Construction of East River jetty. Mar. 2, 1907 Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spurdikes. Mar. 2, 1919 Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deet at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. July 3, 1930 A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. July 3, 1930 Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. June 20, 1938 A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. May 17, 1950 Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Oct. 22, 1976 Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Oct. 17, 1986 Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD 1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. HD 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess.' SD 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. HD 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. Annual Report, 1880, p. 959 HD 407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD 393,64th Cong., 1st sess. SD 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' SD 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' HD 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess.1 HD 110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HR 6, 99th Cong. 2d sess. Section 846 8-13 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA. Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakies Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland Waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide, upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. HD 181, 59th cong., 1st sess. HD 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. HD 261, 69th Cong., 1st sess. HD 262, 69th Cong., 1st sess. SD 39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. HD 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD 283, 76th Cong., 1st sess. HD 227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. HD 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess.1 HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD 115, 87th Cong., 2d sess. HD 226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Oct. 17 1986 Sep. 19 1980 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 11. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971 and HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 12. Water Resources Development Act of March 7, 1974. 16A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 16B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 16C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Providing sediment control works consiting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 1,600 feet by 38 feet. Savannah Harbor widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19,1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island Turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA. For a 5-foot channel. Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam. GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA. Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. BROADWAY LAKE, S.C. Provided for undertaking a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. CLARKS HILL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Clarks Hill Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as project purposes. HARTWELL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA. Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan HD 223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. HD 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct 17, 1986 Section 201 Section 867 HD 255 51st Cong., 2d sess. & Annual Report. 1890 p.1328 HD 962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD 101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD 105, 92d Cong. HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct 17, 1986 Section 867 PL 93-251, 93d Cong. HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864 HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 85-500, 85th Cong., 2d sess. PL 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. SD 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 601 1. Contains latest published maps. 8-15 1.Cotisltspulse mas 8-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in text) TABLE 8-C For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Project See Annual Operation and Status Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962) Completed 1968 25,700- Bellville Point, GA Completed 1986 -- Cedar Point, GA Completed 1982 656,233- Darien Harbor, GA Completed 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 Completed 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Marys River, GA and FL, and Completed 1951 15,688 69,936 North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2'3 Completed 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, GA'5 Completed 1951 9,452 57,172 Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2' 3'4 See Notes 1929 69,600 5,870 Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2'3'5 See Notes 1929 200,556 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 2. Project recommended for abandonment in for construction and $12,849 for operation and H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. maintenance). 3. No commerce reported. 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 4. About84percentcompleted.Owingtoconstruction Authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella of two power dams which submerged much of the Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing work under the present and former projects, this shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodyimprovement cannot be completed as originally namic model. planned. TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 in text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Completed 1941 643,016 38,242 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA 1 See Note 1974 - - Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden Completed 1977 132,640 5,219 County, GA Macon, GA Completed 1955 380,043 38,243 Oates Creek, GA Authorized N/A -2 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed 1976 582,163 5,219 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated Oct. 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 16 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total Clarks Hill, GA and SC Savannah $79,156,0004 $79,156,00014 Hartwell, GA and SC Savannah 89,240,000 89,240,0002 Goat Island, GA and SC5 Savannah 36,400,000 36,400,000' Middleton Shoals, GA and SC 5 Savannah 16,500,000 16,500,0003 Chattooga Units (4), GA and SC Chattoga 41,700,000 41,700,0003 Tallow Hill, GA Broad 39,000,000 39,000,0003 Anthony Shoals, GA Broad 18,100,000 18,100,0003 Newry-Old Pickens, SC 6 Keowee 29,500,000 29,500,0003 1. Final cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee-Toxaway Project. 8-17 TABLE 8-E JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT * JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ......................... .............. 2 2. Arecibo Harbor, P.R ........................ 2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla................ .............. 2 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla .................. 3 5. Canaveral Harbor, Fla ....................... 3 6. Channel from Naples to Big M arco Pass ................... ............. 4 7. Charlotte Harbor, Fla ........................ 4 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ................... 4 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla ....................... 5 10. Fernandina Harbor, Fla ...................... 5 11. Fort Myers Beach, Fla ....................... 5 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla ...................... 6 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla .................. 6 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to M iam i, Fla ...................... ............. 7 15. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla .................... 7 16. John's Pass, Fla .................. ............. 8 17. Longboat Pass, Fla ........................... 8 18. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R ...................... 9 19. Melbourne Harbor, Fla ...................... 9 20. Miami Harbor, Fla ........................... 9 21. New Pass, Sarasota, Fla ..................... 10 22. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla ................. 10 23. Oklawaha River, Fla ......................... 11 24. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla ..................... 11 25. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla ..................... 12 26. Ponce Harbor, P.R ............................ 12 27. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla ................. 13 28. Removal of Aquatic Growth From Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ..... 13 29. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla..................... 14 30. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla........................... 14 31. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla ............................. 15 32. San Juan Harbor, P.R ........................ 15 33. Tampa Harbor, Fla.............. ............. 16 34. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ......... 17 Navigation (cont.) 35. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................................. 36. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ......................... Page 17 17 Beach Erosion Control 37. Brevard County, Fla .................. 17 38. Broward County, Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project ..................... 18 39. Dade County, Fla ...................... 18 40. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, Fla .................. 19 41. Duval County, Fla ..................... 19 42. Fort Pierce, Fla ........................ 20 43. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line ................... 20 44. Pinellas County, Fla ................... 21 45. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................ 21 46. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........... 21 Flood Control 47. Central and Southern Florida .......... 21 48. Four River Basins, Fla ................ 23 49. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R .... 23 50. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 24 51. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................................. 24 52. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................... 24 General Investigations 53. Surveys .................................. 24 54. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... 24 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The authorizing act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 12,411 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 6,305 acres of hydrilla and 1,201 acres of minor plants controlled during the period. Costs incurred for engineering and design and supervision and administration were $183,960 and $32,989, respectively, and $1,973,341 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 903.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non Federal contribution for new work was $288,000. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $10,979. Dredging by contract amounted to $326,870. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $144 and $27,289, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1986 were $1,128,075 for new work and $4,286,232 for maintenance, a total of $5,414,307. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 841-SC.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/ 75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $153. Supervision and administrative costs were $19. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1986, have been $263,659 for new work and $5,300,742 for maintenance, a total of $5,564,401. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FLA. Location. The Harbor connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing Project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11x200 feet, thence 8x100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8x200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. Project depths have been restored. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 456 and 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 44-foot-deep entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (ocean) for harbor dike and lock, and mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1985) price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $26,300,000 Federal cost and $4,354,000 non-Federal cost ($215,000 contributed funds and $4,139,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $85,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $1,106,000. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space and 5 transit sheds with a total shed storage space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 22 storage tanks providing a total of 1,195,620 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Two hundred sixty-six acres of open storage is also available. Two cruise ship berths totaling 1200 feet long by 41-foot depth and two 8800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/ off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are two water-front marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harbor extension contract underway at a cost of $2,620,923. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $183,020 and $116,574, respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks amounted to $1,590,320 for the fiscal year. District communications network cost $24,000. Condition and operation studies for the year cost $73,531. Dredging of the Canaveral Harbor Entrance Channel by hopper dredge amounted to $1,798,418. Costs for the Natural Resource study were $30,584. Cost for operation of service facilities amounted to $7,143. Real estate management costs were $3,152. Costs for permanent operating equipment were $69. Acquisition costs were $4,968. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $157,751 and $324,641, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 82 percent coripleted. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 9-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of. the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1254.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10-foot-depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8-foot-depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses, 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $24,740. Dredging cost was $537,704. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,839 and $62,387, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1255.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande, thence 10 by 100 feet from deep water at Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $15,563. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. SOperations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost was -$274,477. Condition and operation studies cost $93,517. District communications network costs were $10,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,096 and $51,821, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1986 have been $533,169 for new work and $11,487,983 for maintenance, a total of $12,071,152. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities: None. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 x 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,000 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also two marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract cost $133,833. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,098 and $67,693, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 453.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status; 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-foot-wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-federal contribution for new work was $812,000. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marine and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs $17,575. Maintenance: Dredging cost $436,036. Condition and operation studies cost $72,157. District communications network costs were $12,000. Real estate management costs $1,682. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $21,355 and $51,159, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 40 feet for the Kings Bay project. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 855-SC and 1255.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,095. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimp- 9-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 packing houses and several fish-packing houses, two marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreation-craft facilities include nine marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $34,904. Dredging cost $278,725. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,303 and $61,457, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 582.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27- foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 + 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 + 00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the tumrning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 foot at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $66,981. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $12,622 and $23,526, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interests in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. The south jetty and revetments are in good condition. The north jetty is scheduled for repair in FY 87. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of the Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 856- SC, 857-SC, and 858.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by I to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $14,473. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of channel slopes and berms cost $12,254. Removal of sunken vessels by hired labor cost -$800. Real estate audits and administration costs were $7,350. Acquisition costs were $8,456. Permanent equipment costs were $3,642. Bridge maintenance costs were $1,415. District communications network cost $18,000. Condition and operation studies cost $41,744. Supervision and administration costs were $6,606. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in 1983. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1986 were $7,597,078 for new work and $5,426,807 for maintenance, a total of $13,023,- 885. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 841-SC, 843-SC, 845-SC, and 847-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot-depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot-depth; and operation and maintenance of the Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of dredging was $20,867. District communications network cost $18,000. Permanent operating equipment cost $11,919. Condition and operation studies cost $73,597. Real estate management cost $14,785. Acquisition costs were $9,488. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $236,788 and $25,766, respectively. Operation and care: The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $64,489. Condition at end offiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1986, were $19,156,822 for new work: $26,194,217 for maintenance, a total of $45,351,039 regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 636-SC.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400--1,200 feet from the ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Dame Point-Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 400-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and construction of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. 9-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and I .1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided, by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,- 800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,- 266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 223 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $12,000. Condition and operation studies cost $102,593. Real estate audits cost $6,003. Acquisition costs were $8,057. Maintenance dredging costs were $10,000. Jetty maintenance costs were $339,521. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $225,813 and $77,033, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1986 were $43,786,128 for new work, $54,956,799 for maintenance, a total of $98,742,927 regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1257.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $53,732. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging costs were $252,516. Condition and operation studies cost $640. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $200 and $15,879, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. 17. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1256). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alinement to the Intracoastal Waterway and extending along Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maxi- 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT mum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $173,324. Terminal facialities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging costs were $211,493. Condition and operation studies cost $12,322. Supervision and administration costs were $21,586. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 18. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. Location. The project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 931.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreware. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $366. Engineering and design costs were $45. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 19. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 x 800-foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350-foot steel bulkhead with eleven finger piers about 40 feet long each. There are also two privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging costs $196,104. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,272 and $54,812, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 20. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 547 and 1248.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500-foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36-foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; two rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal terminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of the Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. 9-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available warehouse storage includes dry storage at 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage at 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40-ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available thru local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and two offwater yards serve the port. Drydock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities raning from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 70 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and thirteen tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the Seaboard Coast Line and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for recreation facilities at Bay Front Park underway cost $3,643,320. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $81,417 and $146,549, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $104,108. Contract dredging cost $57,625. Real estate management cost $3,265. Acquisition costs were $3,882. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,732 and $536 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. 21. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Fla. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 857-SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $45,811. Terminal facilities. Consists of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and a city pier, 400 feet long with two finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $1,702. Dredging costs were $58,287. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,721 and $8,955, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 22. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 11428 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80-foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60-foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, I municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, a municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150-foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/ or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1986 were $5,178,315 for new work, $23,879,736 for maintenance ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement) a total of $29,058,051. 23. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into the St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing,and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Oklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance costs were $33,333. Real estate management costs were $8,888. Supervision and administration costs were $5,360. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1986 have been $311,352 for new work and $2,044,552 for maintenance, a total of $2,355,904. 24. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 291 and 1248.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $509,506. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial 9-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space in not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Management of natural resources cost $3,750. Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $44,734. Contract for jetty maintenance cost $545,196. Real estate management costs were $4,735. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $78,126 and $34,843, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetments are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 86. 25. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1245.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively; and a weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,- 600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair of jetty cost $33,719. Real estate management costs were $10,319. Condition and operation studies cost $56,628. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $336 and $5,091, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was completed in FY 86. 26. PONCE HARBOR, P.R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart Nos. 927 and 902.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier; dredging an area off the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36- foot-deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $9,770,000 Federal ($7,328,000 Corps and $10,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $3,989,- 000 non-Federal (other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. A 25% contribution is required and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are availabe providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $23,884 and $1,91 1, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $518. Supervision and administration cost was $65. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 27. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 546.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for a distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $33,800,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $7,062,000 non- Federal cost, ($160,000 contributed funds and $6,902,000 other costs.) (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 square feet, cold storage at 2,098,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270-ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the Seaboard Coast Line railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract underway for recreation facilities cost $209,252. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,379 and $177,417, respectively. Maintenance: Real estate inspection costs were $1,618. Acquisition costs were $5,221. Condition and operation studies cost $386. Supervision and administration costs were $1,033. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 28. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. 9-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) (See Table 9- G for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 16,950 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinths and/or water lettuce), 3,142 acres of hydrilla and 1,024 acres of minor plants were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under maintenance control. 29. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1243 and 1244.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $137,500. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging costs were $334,147. Condition and operation studies cost $14,818. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $870 and $37,584 respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. Project is completed expect for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30,1986 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,714,107 for maintenance, a total of $6,119,238. 30. ST. JOHN'S RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Fla., near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 685---688.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Hamey, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and July 24, 1946 (S. Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum products. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Supervision and administration costs were $834. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to Annual Report for FY 1963). 31. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1247.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 non-Federal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Hired labor at recreational facility cost $1,539. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,925 and $23,522, respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging costs $556. Recreation costs -$1,539. Condition and operation studies cost $76,686. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were -$5,711 and -$23,521, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1986 were $10,945,344 for new work (including $3,086,026 contributed funds) and $4,703,934 for maintenance, a total of $15,649,278. 32. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 908.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing its width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepending Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400 foot width; an advance maintenance area 500 feet wide, 1,200 feet long and 44 9-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 feet deep at the mouth of Cano de Martin Pena; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepending cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width and six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. Local interests have complied with authorization requirements to date. There was no non-Federal contribution required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deepdraft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, two piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, nine at the eastern side and three at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and three on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, seven are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. Pier No. 6 has been repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $3,352. Contract dredging cost $2,245,499. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $364 and $69,285, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1986 were $13,027,284 for new work and $14,296,248 for maintenance, a total of $27,323,532 regular funds. In addition, $747,684 was expended for new work and $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs. 33. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tampa Harbor is a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast' of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 586, 587, and 1257.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel, and 34 x 300 in East Bay Channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1985 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $233,638,000 Federal ($225,500,000 Corps and $2,218,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $5,920,000 non-Federal cost ($1,400,000 contributed funds and $4,520,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/91/2 and HD 150/91 / 1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of shed storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel is a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases or marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The Seaboard System Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #17 revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Charge off cost on purchased transponder for offshore disposal positioning -$8,567. Construction of the 43-foot project from Mangrove Point to Alafia River completed at a cost of $742,407. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $726,882 and $220,225, respectively. Maintenance: Real estate audits cost $815. Condition and operation studies cost $168,629. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $81,347 and $11,570, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/2 is 65 percent complete.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1986 were: Main project: $194,934,023 for new work and $19,201,025 for maintenance, a total of $214,135,048 regular funds. In addition, $853,050 was expended for new work from public works funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $1,029,180 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 34. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 35. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. (See Table 9-I.) 36. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aguadilla Harbor, PR, $7,198; Benner Bay - Mangrove Lagoon, V.I., $800; Blount Island, Florida, $23,492; Cedar Island- Keaton Beach Channel, Florida, $18,595; Dunedin Pass, Florida, $629; North Lake Channel, Hollywood, Florida, $22,741; Pasco County, Small Boat Channel, Florida, $319; Rockhous Creek, Florida, $24,988; and Willoughby Creek, Florida, $973. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 37. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1245 and 1246.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. 9-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the sand-transfer plant authorized for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $8,450,000 Federal costs and $8,550,000 non-Federal cost ($8,450,000 cash contribution and $100,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $3,598. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 38. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in northern part of Broward County. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1248.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to provide and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protective and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $18,300,000 Federal and $22,400,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $17,452 and $163, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 39. DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey chart No. 1248.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $47,100,000 Federal cost and $40,039,000 non-Federal cost ($38,200,000 cash contribution and $1,839,000 other costs). 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved 30 June 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for Jetty Rehabilitation and Extension continued at a cost of $2,234,743. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $157,224 and $50,278, respectively. 40. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FLA. Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1248.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation in the nourishment of the existing project from 10 years to the life of the project. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1985 price levels) was $12,300,000 Federal and $12,000,000 non-Federal cash contribution and $100,000 other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the costsharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and the Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to provide lands, easements and rights-of-way and relocations, pay 50% of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, pay 35% of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention, hold the United States free from damages, control water pollution and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $11,352 and $1,587, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 41. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1243.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1985 price levels) $15,500,000 Federal and $13,334,000 non- Federal ($11,000,000 contributed funds and $2,334,- 000 for other costs. 9-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment continued at a cost of $1,385,023. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $61,133 and $47,395, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and four year advance nourishment has been completed. 42. FORT PIERCE, FLA. Location. Fort Pierce Beach erosion project fronts the Atlantic Ocean and is on coastal barrier island in St. Lucie County which separates Indian River from the ocean. Area is 120 miles north of Miami and about 225 miles south of Jacksonville. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 582.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the cost of a shore restoration and protection project which involves construction and periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation amounts to one-half such costs for that part of the ocean shoreline extending 1.2 miles southward of Fort Pierce navigation inlet, and 70 percent of such costs for the adjacent 0.1 miles shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park. Mean range of tide in area is 2.6 feet. Cost estimate (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $3,460,000 Federal and $3,230,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (HD 84/89/1) as modified by section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute one-half the costs of protecting and periodically nourishing for 10 years the reach of shoreline starting at and extending 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet and 30 percent of cost of protecting and periodically nourishing 0.1 mile of shoreline known as Lions Club Beach Park; obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of detailed plans and specifications for the project; establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits prior to reimbursement; furnish all lands and rights-of-way; furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores; exclude permanent human habitation and provide full park facilities at the Lions Club Beach Park; provide periodic nourishment of the beach; control water pollution; hold United States free from damages; and execute such further assurances and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the intent of Congress expressed in the acts authorizing or modifying the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965 authorized construction of the project by local interests. Section 102 of 1968 River and Harbor Act modified the project to provide for construction by Secretary of Army and Section 215 of the same act permitted construction by local interests. Local interests have elected to construct the project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 2, 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach nourishment has been completed. 43. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE OF LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1247 and 1248.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 4.8 percent of the cost for the Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 11.6 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 5.1 percent for South Lake Worth Inlet -Boca Raton Inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $10,800,000 Federal and $18,400,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $32,407 and $3,192, respectively. 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY 1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. 44. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts Nos. 858 and 1257.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $18,700,000 Federal funds and $20,062,000 non-Federal funds ($20,000,000 contributed funds and $62,000 for other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Redington shore breakwater and groin cost $469,060. Contract for Long Key breakwater and beach nourishment costs were $572,035. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $299,863 and $41,985, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 25 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1986 were $3,614,327 Federal funds and $2,637,896 contributed funds for new work and $5,625 for maintenance. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 46. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Boca de Congrejos, P.R., $13,186; Dorado Public Beach, P.R., $3,223; Dunedin Shores, Florida, $4,175; Fort Clinch State Park, Florida, $10,062; Guanica Public Beach, P.R., $14,765; Gulfport, Florida, $20,507; Isla de Cabras, P.R., $11,503; Key Biscayne, Fla., $43,884; Playa de Santa Isabel, P.R., $2,919; and Puerto Nuevo Beach, P.R., $3,297. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-483, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93- 251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 47. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee- Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. 9-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastasting floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1985 price levels) is $753,310,000 Federal funds ($751,000,000 Corps and $2,310,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $200,- 000,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Local interests costs in reviewing plans. and specifications are expected to be $700,000. In addition, estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations is $211,960,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (I) Levees 47, 58, 49 and 50-total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D 1, LD2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-l l, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end offiscal year. The scheduled work of project is 79 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9-P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1986 were $291,129,760 for new work, $51,180,261 for maintenance, a total of $342,310,021. In addition, $52,561,791 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 48. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins-the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area -a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River-four flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River-a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River---one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River-Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon: outlet anal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1985 price level) is $187,000,000 Federal funds and $131,820,000 non-Federal cost. ($38,700,000 contributed funds; $55,270,000 for lands and damages; and $37,850,000 for relocations.) (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Completed contract for Tampa Bypass Shoal removal and cleanup cost was $1,160,254. Contract for Dead River recreation sites was completed at a cost of $187,267. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $244,340 and $122,265, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 49. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Carribean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement-one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River; with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1985 price level) is $301,000,000 Federal cost and $80,077,000 non-Federal cost ($60,177,000 for lands and damages; $12,414,000 for relocation; and 9-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 $7,486,000 for highway bridges and approaches). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Cerrillos Dam & Spillway continued at a cost of $10,966,326. Hired labor costs were $62,749. Contract for Cerrillos Dam diversion tunnel and foundation preparation continued at a cost of $319,141. Contract for Upper Portugues Channel Sections 6E and 6F cost $870,066. Contract for Section 7 continued at a cost of $447,898. Contracts for Bucana Debris Basin excavation and Portugues Channel improvement and debris control basin has respective costs of $1,540,164 and $1,330,114. Contract for Section 6D cost $946,086. Cultural resource investigations cost $335,541. Area office equipment cost $18,912. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,604,782 and $1,765,- 038, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 47 percent complete. 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $27,180. 52. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $154,262 for the Disaster Preparedness Program, and $179,229 for national emergency and mobilization readiness plans. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $68,088 for Barrio Barrero, Rincon, Puerto Rico; and $8,816 for Highway 187, El Terraplan, Puerto Rico. General Investigations 53. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $251,981; flood damage prevention studies, $825,046; shoreline protection studies, $42,729; and special studies $289 for a total of $1,120,045. 54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, Fla., $64,867; Gold Coast hurricane evacuation study, $900; and Technical services, $93,048. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va., and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) Eau Gallic Harbor. Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,991,000 2,106,000 2,074,745 2,134,771 451,914 1,564,000 42,308 1,960,302 1,073,000 3,121,103 200,000 132,655 4,924,000 5,014,000 9,063 9,324 82,438 6,884 20.685 2,240,347 S1,995,672 -70,000 458,802 149,329 122,033 500,000 246,727 1, 120,000 1,114,598 972,087 i ,048,073 858 1,531,0(X) 1,949,141 76.37() 73,073 2,626,000 2,300,000 2,622,586 2, 190,290 200,253 190,474 6,656 -8,290 16,241 3,300,000 241,023 5,790,500 5,628,309 103,000 83,296 62,526 2,024,000 2,005,725 310,(XX) 242, 145 1,593,(XX) 1,578,798 341,000 365,282 8,429 8,630 7,525 10,290 148,000 2,886,993 3,853,000 4,014,577 33,523 623,853 642,523 - 116,918 -99,761 25,000(XX) 82,642 1,563,(XX) 1,603,791 375,(XX) 172,(XX) 345,057 202,624 9-25 21,794,670 21,614,149 1, 128,075' 1, 128,075' 4,286,699 4,286,232 361,225' 361,225' 5,300,742 5,300,742 243,235 243,235' 185,688 185,688 1 1,569,9 I04 10,929,264 36,641,321 36,606,531 1, 106,000 1 ,036,523 305,290 305,290 1 ,628,847 1,626,747 159,975 1 59,975 533,169 533,1595 11,489,133 11,487,983 63,197,473 63,186,455 19,444,463 19,381,933' 9,627 9,627 708,284 705,668 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 I10. Femrnandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) II. Fort Myers Beach Channel, Fla. (Federal Funds) 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway., Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 14. Intracoastal Waterway., Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Jacksonville Harbor. Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Johns Pass. Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 7,141 716,(XX) 965,781 7,(XX) 7,141 13,521 13,654 1,215,646 985,514 773 ,(XX) 115,111 1.207.620 1.284.573 -2,(XX) -116 3,768,928 4,368,503 -35 2,261 ,(XX) 2,244,910 116 17,575 577,652 594,389 35 56,464 46,375 -134,834 125.783 170,3(X) 810,601 709 939.046 936. 138 77.2 14 63,391 1 25,(XX) 139,039 929,962 852,580 3.(07,099 5.365.7(X) 7.355.(XX) 339,545 8.048.812 7.362.380 6.657 8.136 342 37.419 37.419 I 342.839 341.589 367,561 377,389 136.675 153.614 88.2(X) 98,667 391 .036 486,735 61,0(X) 4,147,816 4.112,506 22,734,019 22,732,344 812,(X)0 811,054 158,140 158,140 1.086,446 I ,086,185 356,056 356,056 3.790,835 3,787,097 18,574 18,574 8. 112.557 8.122,557 5.879.738' 5,877.556' 19,251,598" 19.251.598" 26,425,4672 26,407,439' 61,(XX) - 47.596,278 - 47.596.278' 771.854 55.502.239" 781 .020 55.5(X). 198 ' - 102.813 - 102.813 - 927.654" - 927,654' 25.(XX) 25,(XX) 268.()15 269.265 82.098" 82.098" 1 .407.830() 1.407.830 9-26 15. JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 I 7. Longboat Pass. Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Mayaguez Harbor. P.R. (Federal Funds) 19. Melbourne Harbor. Fla. (Federal Funds) 20. Miami Harbor., Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. New Pass Sarasota, Fla. (Federal Funds) 22. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 24. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost -414 3.229 340.(XX) 327. 124 -708 41.025 71 1 33.523 I 30.(XX) 271,4 16 29.868 29.868 76.(XX) 69.582 1(X).(XX) 93,539 57,259 57.259 8,239 9,119 80,(XX) 77,577 1,387,0(X00 1,690,333 40),(XX) 31.430 875,000 702,717 2,439 1.746,3(X) 1,720,4(X) S10,0(X) 18, I07 -3.984 3,039 228.(X)0 233.567 I .(X)).(XX) 269,054 116,512 60,856 894,(X)0 892,444 262 2.084,(X(X) 2,022,254 4,062 7,594 232.525 245,401 11,154 11.632 251.338 252.188 5,190,(XX) 3,871,286 129.211 183.359 75,893 77,449 I.020,233 I ,020,233 1.400.487 I .4(X)00.487 172.324 172.324 168.187 168.187 1.032,674 1,032.674 17.696 17.696 634.864 634.863 30.986.066 28.919.556 2.51 1.825 2.510.317 2.262.710" 2.262,7 10 45,81 I" 45,811" 3.108.304 3,108,304 - 21,4(X),590'" - 21,4(X),590'" 1,683,(XX) 3 1 .544.966 1,779,336 31.460,886' - 503.7(X) - 503.7(X) 45,572 48,143 45,697 3,725,(XX) 685,212 208,803 3,721,562 711,384 315,264 315,264, 2,048,320" 2,044,552 6,904,021 6,90)4,021 ' 9.210,1 18 9,207.7142 9-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 25. Ponce de Leon InleFtl,a. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Ponce Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 27. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 28. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 29. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 30. St. Johns River, Fla. Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 31. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. San Juan Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 33. Tampa Harbor, Fla. (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work & Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - - 323,000 2,600,000 161,230 2,742,016 50,000 5,977 -21,388 622 3,641,995 212 212 25,025 32,771 38,000 35,020 1,533,415 350,000 304,179 2,092,000 2,622,000 2,192,273 2,803,286 8,112 8,128 9,968 9,977 900,000 758,819 32,094 71,798 136,000 250,909 -60,159 23,539 21,502,000 19,855,010 1,290,000 1,036,867 135,000 116,418 80,000 74,285 33,615 33,589 514,688 286,610 273,332 394,043 176,942 168,086 150,725 9,870,000 9,352,559 210,700 463,233 60,000 63,490 - - 1,953,277 - - 1,953,277 6,465,846 106,192 15,234,586 6,477,022 108,285 15,217,466 - - 2,415,600 - - 2,415,600 - - 1,379,000 - - 612,663 25,000 6,187 131 2,500 3,500,000 4,165,925 170,889 2 16,660 25,795 23,506 24,117 53,000 283,422 36,810 36,790 482,9076 452,698' S1,327,870 1,327,870 44,308,773" 44,246,954' 1,598,480 1,598,410 2,465,000 2,474,000 28,011,370 2,450,831 2,477,801 27,977,510 90,000 367,049 74,992 387,772 324,99 1 320,979 585 2,075,000 2,079,004 233,983 382,492 16,039 20,077 30,986 60,091 57,293 74,172 170,229 2,339,241 150,401 2,376,226 17,015,000 1 8,838,450 170,000 165,443 100,000 111,481 1,354,000 1,669,404 255,000 262,361 11,543 1,476,434x 1,476,434 - 4,714,107 4,714,107 1,171,243' I,17 1,214'9 1,300,299 1,300,299 ' 7,863,602 7,859,3181 4,716,006 4,703,934 3,086,026 3,086,026 13,774,968' 13,774,968' 14,341,181 14,340,9786 195,858,643 195,787,073 19,222,522 19,218,1326 1,029,962 1,029,180 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 37. Brevard County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 38. Broward County, Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla. Navigation Project (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 39. Dade County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40. Dade County, N.of Haulover Beach, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Duval County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Ft. Pierce, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - 1,321 576 4,334 614 614 510,000 -487,351 230,000 1,221,775 -3,315 3,637 4,730,000 4,773,650 246,200 50,000 59,751 100,000 1,000,000 55,449 258,970 - 200,000 29,159 23,089 69 4,969 7,107 40,(XX) 44,904 17,945 -1,797 50,000 -300,000 279,393 360,000 33,204 15,000 2,350,000 1,096,216 2,370,000 926,428 -415 415 3,598 2,346,492 2,274,749 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 - 11,033,100 17,615 11,000,483 - 26,884 - 26,884 - 1,758,841- - 1,758,841' 940,000 1,759,116 741,000 683,129 135,000 12,939 -506,000 1,221,457 272,094 3(X),(XX) 2,050,(XX) -300,000 48,942 1,884,034 35,599 33,283,956 33,165,993 23,575,085 23,186, 133" 150,000 12,939 8,912,900 8,381,739 6,712,400 5,336,041 1, 175,448w 1,151,021 ' 31,734 31,734 773,0(X) 769,412 3,920,834 3,839,409 13,621 13,621 9-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 8.6 Sept. 30, 1986 44. Pinellas County, New Work: Fla. Approp. - 700,000 -1 30,000 803,000 3,9 1 2,693 (Federal Funds) Cost 542,817 290,475 316,002 943,102 3,614,327 Maint: Approp. - - - - 5,625 Cost - - - - 5,625 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - -140,706 368,342 549,250 3,102,64 I Cost 505,218 217,566 50,710 439,840 2,637,896 47. Central and New Work: Southern Florida Approp. 9,000,000 8,600,000 8,400,000 6,065,000 292,121,397 (Federal Funds) Cost 6,865,717 11,422,711 7,439,279 7,814,088 29 I,129,760 Maint: Approp. 3,980,000 4,292,000 4,073,000 4,733,500 51,234,46 I Cost 3,953,714 4,550,595 4,254,980 4,916,056 51, 180,26 I (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 1,271,700 2,179,837 1,770,263 1,322,261 55,373,636 Cost 756,016 1,652,885 1,030,971 813,118 52,561,791 48. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. 3,595,000 -1,600,000 1,050,000 903,000 72,380,095' (Federal Funds) Cost 1,076,456 764,489 564,734 1,714,126 72,241,196' (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 352,148 335,412 647,000 360,000 12,746,860 Cost 389,206 335,379 359,508 347,003 12,370,477 49. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 18,990,000 18,700,000 22,600,000 20,949,000 141,374,568 P.R. Cost 19,476,203 16,702,794 24,210,107 21,238,471 139,702,052 (Federal Funds) 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 1. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. 5. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15.563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $1 13,744 for maintenance and operation of dams. 7. Includes $160,367 expended for recreation facilities. 8. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec. 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 10. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 11. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. 12. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 13. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 14. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 15. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 16. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 1 07 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1 966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 17. Includes $2,202,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $4,957,795 for recreation facilities. 18. Includes $343,479 work-in-kind and $160,429 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. 19. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 20. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreation facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 21. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 22. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $1 ,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 24. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 25. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 26. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 27. Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. 28. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 29. Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 30. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 31. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 32. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 33. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 34. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. Includes $15,000 Appropriation for new work East Bay Channel. 35. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 36. Excludes work-in-kind. 37. Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbour. 38. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 39. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 40. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. 41. Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 9-31 TABLE 9-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 July 14, 1960 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 P.L. 675/77 July 23, 1942 June 20, 1938 June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cut-offs BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) Channel II x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1stse ss. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1stse ss. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 70th Cong., I1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., Ist sess. 9-32 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act. of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March I, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 PARA June 26, 1934 Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 13 of Text) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., Ists ess. H.Doc. 284, 77th Cong., 1sts ess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., Ists ess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., Ist sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21 74th Cong., I1st sess. H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., Ist sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-fioot channel in Boca Ciega Bay INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami Channel width of 1(X) feet Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act 9-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. July 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 Under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 10 of 1966 R&H Act. Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended August 30, 1935 August 20, 1937 July 3, 1930 PWA Program September 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian Turning basin at Vero Beach Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 16 of Text) Channel 10 x 150 feet in the gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 17 of Text) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 18 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 20 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth The channel at the Dinner Key Airport An 18-foot channel in a landcut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912 A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., Ist sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72d Cong., I1sts ess. and specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., Ist sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. 9-34 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward The Virginia Key improvement For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turninrg basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interest contribute one-third of the cost. Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot-wide section to 400 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot-wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Blvd. terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 21 of Text) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-foot-deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 23 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., I1sts ess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., Ist sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act 9-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 SR. October 1, 1976 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 24 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 26 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 27 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., I1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., I1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., I1sts ess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., Ist sess. 9-36 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 SR. May 31, 1974 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 28 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal o 1 water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 29 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 30 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka The improvement of Deep Creek Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project.) A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff) A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet thru bar cut, tapering to 150 feet thru the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 32 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1stse ss. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report for 1899, p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., I1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32-foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 33 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the'Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under the title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., I1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72d Cong., Ist sess. 9-38 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and I,200 feet long (in lieu of improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., Ist sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. 9-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. August 15, 1985 BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 August 13, 1968 August 15, 1985 October 27, 1965 October 27, 1965 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet Maintenance of East Bay Channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 37 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project BROWARD COUNTY, FLA., BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 38 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore north thereof to Port Everglades DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FLA. (See Section 40 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project FORT PIERCE, FLA. (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection projects PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 43 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 47 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 84, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., Ist sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-40 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project for Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 48 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 49 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., Ist sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-C CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract Cost $2,966,539 '56 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed increased to 600 feet to be compatible with increased width. Opera- 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length tion and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) Henry H. Buckman Lock Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)' Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Lower (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type const. Percent complete Estimated contract cost Palatka, 1 1.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 15 Piles in sand Movable Earth' 100 $6,094,000 R.N. Eureka Lock Bert Dosh and Dam Lock Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth 100 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0- 15' 16-31 16 Piles in sand None 0 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 'Clear width and greatest available length. Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-42 TABLE 9-D Dunnellon Lock Dunnellon, 2.5 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-31' 18 Rock None 0 Inglis Lock and Dam Inglis, 3.2 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 15 Rock Movable Earth 100 $7,800,000 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-E CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Engineering and Design $ 75,484 Supervision and Administration 7,185 Total 82,642 Operation and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways, reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system $ 472,620 Contract maintenance of locks, grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing 60,461 Visitor Assistance 1,884 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract maintenance of grounds 362,249 Condition and operations studies and periodic inspections 84,288 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis, Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control 71,027 Real Estate audits, inspections and outgrants 12,377 OSHA medical exams 3,519 Supervision and Administration 15,711 Sub-Total 1,084,181 Maintenance: Maintenance of dams and spillways $ 19,733 Maintenance of locks and lock repair contract 54,479 Maintenance of roads, bridges 3,754 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment (Recreation) 33,656 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 147,814 Bank stabilization-maintenance of slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank stabilization contract. 114,924 Maintenance of canals, clearing and snagging 82,973 Engineering and Design 55,427 Supervision and Inspection 5,950 Real Estate encroachments 8,844 Sub-Total 527,554 Income credits - 7,944 Total 1,603,791 Income from Recreation Fees 23,406 9-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 22 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of Locks, and Performance Monitoring System 418,102 Contract maintenance buildings grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network 335,461 Natural resource management 80,231 Management of recreation areas and facilities 297,232 Real estate management and energy conservation reports 29,801 OSHA medical exams 2,400 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections 102,219 Supervision and Administration 36,515 Sub-Total 1,301,961 Maintenance: Maintenance of locks, and contract maintenance of locks 192,462 Real estate acquisitions, surveys and encroachments 32,726 Maintenance of recreational facilities 15,333 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment, non-recreational 88,456 Bank Stabilization 1,690 Contract operation of reservoir and dam maintenance 89,526 Channel and canal maintenance 42,296 Engineering and Design 12,418 Supervision and Inspection 39,215 Sub-Total 514, 122 Income Credits - 36,747 Total 1,779,336 Income from Recreation Fees 17,940 9-44 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 16,608 $1,618,615 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 4,508 439,314 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines, and work tools 141,454 Income credits - 402 Operation of communications network 18,000 OSHA medical exams 1i15 Engineering design 54,670 Supervision and Administration 206,035 Total 21, I 16 2,477,801 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 34 of Text) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period' Anclote River, Fla. FY 1986 $20,677 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. FY 1986 9,608 Christiansted Harbor, P.R. 1985 723 Clearwater Pass, Fla. FY 1986 10,766 Courtney Channel, Fla. FY 1986 7,971 Crystal River, Fla. FY 1986 14,920 Daytona Beach Side Channel, Fla. FY 1986 7,277 Key West Harbor, Fla. 1985 849 Kissimmee River, Fla. FY 1986 23,841 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. FY 1986 9,809 Manatee River, Fla. FY 1986 10,295 Miami River, Fla. 1985 2,187 New River, Fla. FY 1986 7,714 Orange River, Fla. 1985 390 Pass-a-Grille, Fla. FY 1986 6,583 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. FY 1986 7,885 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. FY 1986 15,015 Suwannee River, Fla. FY 1986 23,289 'Includes Supervision and Administration 9-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 $ 267,427 $ 628,142 Aquatic Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,700' - Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153 - Bayport, Fla.' 1972 58,495� - Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. 1977 168,569 - 70,240 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, V.I.6 1964 303,317 57,800 Clearwater Pass, Fla."' 1980 46,3497 1,220,271 Courtenay Channel, Fla.' 1940 22,846 26,779 Crystal River, Fla.' 1941 25,000 128,000 Everglades Harbor, Fla.' 1964 221,509 51,034 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.' 1945 - - Guayanes Harbor, P.R.' 1945 - - Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla.' 1974 38,850 - Homosassa River, Fla.' 1937 3,9994 23,334 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 137,493 Hudson River, Fla.' 1974 9,889 - Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. 1963 243,079 28,046 Key West Harbor, Fla.' 1972 1,548,892' 534,623 Kissimmee River, Fla.' 1931 23,479 112,954 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla." 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, Fla.' ' 2 1966 117,443' 51,149 Little Manatee River, Fla. " 1949 11,903' - Manatee River, Fla." 1970 123,350 194,516 New River, Fla.' 1956 36,518 31,296 Orange River, Fla.' 1962 2,000 24,918 Ozona, Fla., channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 15,089 Palm Beach, Fla., side channel and basin' 1946 - - Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. ' '" 1966 41,297' 60,268 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,000 '" 261,401 Rice Creek, Fla.' 1957 85,2086 18,814 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. 1983 255,6082 " 1,570,459"' St. Thomas Harbor, V.I.' 1949 1,989 - Steinhatchee River, Fla.' 1940 135,053 43,329 Suwannee River, Fla." 1977 76,41822 219,261 Withlacoochee River, Fla. ' 1969 614,912 370,305 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Inactive. 4. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 5. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 7. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 11. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14. Expended on restudy. 15. Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 16. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 17. Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 22. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 23. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 9-46 TABLE 9-I JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 45 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,862' - El Tuque Beach, Ponce, P.R. 1985 1,396,730 - Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 197 - - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 - - Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,201 1,656 Manatee County, Fla. 1983 217,600 - Punta Salinas, P.R. 1984 855,511 - Palm Beach County, Fla.f,r om Lake Worth Inletto South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965-- Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,667,2206 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project reports 4. Excludes $360,000 contributed funds. but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. 5. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by local inter- 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. ests in lieu of cash contribution. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $714,522 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 47 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Comrn- Actual No. Name (miles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-47 TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 47 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Percent Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sills (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete W.P.Franklin Lock and Dam' S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 (HGS-6 Mod.) S-308B (Port Mayaca) S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 At Olga Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Moore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 23 26 20 25 14 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 11 9 5 666 10 12 14 14 16 8 12 4 15 56 x 400 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 50 x 250 50 x 60 50x 60 56 x 400 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 30 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 2.5 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 3.0 48.5-52.3 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5-17.5' 15.5-17.5' 15.5-17.5' 15.5-17.5' 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 14 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 12.9 7.5 18 6 6666666666666 Piles in clay Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Piles in sand Slab on sand Piles in sand and slab on sand Slab on sand Earth foundation, sand Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Movable None None None None None None None None None Fixed None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete rigid frame Reinforced concrete Steel sheet pile lockwalls Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Concrete and concrete Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. 'Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) isa Federal responsibility. Estimated (Oct. 1985). 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. Contract Cost 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 000 100 000000000 lO IO IO O0 !o $3,803,655.00 $1,191,574.70 $1,513,693.91 $1,050,600.69 $1,326,073.12 $1,213,248.51 $1,320,039.84 $369,0002 $3,448,406 $523,000? $8,308,700.00 $2,004,000? $2,004,000? $2,000,0002 $2,004,000? $689,217.00 $2,004,0002 $2,004,0002 $1,962,0002 $1,757,0002 $1,672,0002 $1,623,0002 $1,664,000? $2,116,0002 $1,913,0002 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-M CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 47 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contributions' June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 PL 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Fklood Control Act 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Railroad bridges $ 554,103 Channels and canals 598,068 Levees 2,763,597 Floodway control and diversion structures 885,123 Pumping plants 586,081 Buildings, grounds and utilities 5,011 Cultural Resource Preservation 8,045 Equipment operation 300 Depreciation -308 Engineering and design 2,499,329 Supervision and administration 727,857 Total cost 8,627,206 Operations: Operation of locks, real estate outgrants, performance monitoring system 453,921 Maintenance of buildings and grounds, operation and maintenance of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs 225,576 Patrol, inspection and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike, HGS 3, 4 and 5, operation and maintenance of drainage ditches, culverts and 16 spillways, mowing of levees 497,786 Reimbursement to SFWMD for pumping plant operations 202,438 Natural resource management 62,951 Operation and Maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning 292,104 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, NOAA, dam safety 250,633 Regulation of Lake Okeeshobee and three conversation areas, water control analysis, water quality studies, and data collection 765,083 Energy conservation reports and OSHA medical exams 2,642 Supervision and Administration 62,462 Sub-Total 2,815,596 Maintenance: Contract maintenance of locks 614,390 Maintenance of recreational roads and bridges and permanent operating equipment 8,889 Repair and stabilization of Crown Road, Herbert Hoover Dike, removal of weeds, rebuilding and regrading of levee slopes, modification and maintenance of safety barriers, HGS 3, 4 and 5, cleaning landslide toe ditches, repair of culverts, replacement of fences, removal of trees, topping of trees, control of Melaleuca, rip rapping of slopes and berms 905,369 Maintenance of hydrometrological network, maintenance of non recreational permanent operating equipment 428,006 Maintenance of berms, fences and shrubs 12,260 Clear landslide entrance channel to culverts, approach channels, hurricane gate structures and floodway channels 576 Engineering and Design 2,404 Supervision and Inspection 134,610 Sub-Total 2, 106,504 Income Credits - 6,044 Total 4,916,056 Income from recreation fees 23,074 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Bridges: B-127 (C-51) April 1983-December 1985- Channels and Canals: C-51 Summit to Forest Hill Blvds October 1985-September 1986- Levees: Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment- 2nd Contract September 1983-January 1986- Structures: S-343A, 343B, 344, 346, 347 and Modifications to L-28 Borrow Canal and Tieback June 1983-May 1986 June 1984 S-65 A, B, C & D Baffle Blocks and Riprap Repair September 1984-December 1985- TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 47 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Channels and Canals: C-51 East End May 1982 100 Levees: Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment Ist Contract (4 miles) March 1983 99 3rd Contract February 1985 35 4th Contract July 1985 85 5th Contract August 1986 1 Structures: S-155 May 1982 100 HGS-4 Replacement (S-351) January 1986 15 9-51 Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of River Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Type of construction Percent complete Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, Fla. 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Br., B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. IA C-135, Sec. IB C-135, Sec. IC & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-55 Levees: L-212, Sec. I L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites July 1968 - Mar. 1970 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Jan. 1973 - Jan. 1974 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Dec. 1972-July 1975 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 July 1966-Aug. 1967 May 1968 - Sep. 1972 Jan. 1971 - Dec. 1973 Dec. 1972 - Apr. 1975 Feb. 1975 - Aug. 1977 Apr. 1976-Jan. 1979 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 July 1973 - Apr. 1975 July 1973-Jan. 1974 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Apr. 1966-Jan. 1969 June 1970-July 1971 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 July 1967-Sep. 1968 Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 July 1970-Feb. 1972 June 1968 - July 1970 July 1970-Sep. 1971 March 1977-Oct. 1980 May 1978-July 1981 May 1978-July 1981 May 1978-July 1981 April 1979- Aug. 1981 June 1979- Sep. 1981 December 1982 - August 1984 March 1985-July 1986 9-52 TABLE 9-Q REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 48 of Text) Not transferred Do. Do. Do. July 1975 Dec. 1968 Oct. 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct. 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov. 1977 Dec. 1975 Dec. 1975 Sep. 1968 Apr. 1969 Nov. 1971 Dec. 1968 Nov. 1977 Apr. 1977 Nov. 1968 Dec. 1975 Not transferred Dec. 1975 Dec. 1975 Oct. 1980 Jan. 1983 Jan. 1983 Jan. 1983 Oct. 1981 Jan. 1985 Dec. 1986 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-S OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 51 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,485' Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection' 1966 Hillsborough Bay, Fla.' 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.' 1966 I. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was 2. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 52 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Alligator Creek Basin, CL Fla. $ 28,382 Bear Creek, Pinellas County, Fla. 2,026 Crane Creek, Melbourne, Fla. 7,138 Naquabo River, P.R. 66,557 RioCibuco, Vega Baja, P.R. 70,301 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, P.R. 25,016 Sabana Grande, P.R. 33,593 Savan Gut-St. Thomas, V.1. 170,473 Seminole Basin-Largo, Fla. 45,265 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, V.I. 968 Wares Creek, Bradenton, Fla. 5,308 Whitaker Bayou, Sarasota, Fla. 3,582 9-53 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until 1 October 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Apalachicola Bay, FL ................. . 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ............................. 3. Bayou Coden, AL ...................... 4. Bayou La Batre, AL .................. 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS ................... 6. Biloxi Harbor, East Harrison County Canal, MS .................... 7. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL .......................... 8. Bon Secour River, AL ................. 9. Dauphin Island Bay, AL ............... 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL .............. 11. East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL ........... 12. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL . ............. . 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border (Mobile District) ............................ 14. Mobile Harbor, AL ................... 15. Panama City Harbor, FL .............. 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............. 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL ............... 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ............ 19. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS ........ 20. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................. 21. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 22. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................. Deauthorized Projects 23. Deauthorized Projects ................ Page Beach Erosion Control 10-3 24. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ..................... 10-3 10-3 1 A- 25. Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization ........... 10-4 Flood Control 26. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................. 10-5 27. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, MS ......................... 10-5 28. Airport Road Bridge, 10-6 Frankstown, MS ..................... 10-6 29. Big Brown Creek and 10-7 Tributary, Prentiss Co., MS ........... 30. Boligee Canal Boligee, AL ............. 10-7 31. Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL ..... 10-7 32. County Road Bridge over Leaf River, Mahned, MS.............. 33. Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS ... 34. Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL .... 10-8 35. Houston School Rd. Bridge, 10-9 Itawamba Co., MS.................. 10-9 36. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, 10-10 Hattiesburg, MS................... 10-10 37. Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS ....... 10-11 38. Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL .................... 10-11 39. Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL ....................... 10-1240. Noxubee River Relief Bridge, 10-12 Shuqualak, MS ...................... 41. Sewerline Protection, 10-12 Valley, AL .......................... 10-1242. Sope Creek, 1012 Marietta, GA ........................ 43. Tallabinella Creek, 10-12 Chickasaw Co., MS ................. 10-1 10-12 10-12 10-12 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-15 10-15 10-15 10-15 10-16 10-16 10-16 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 44. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS and AL ......................... 45. Tombigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL ......................... 46. US Highway 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL ......................... 47. Wolf Creek, US Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS ................. 48. Old Highway 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS ..................... 49. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL ........................ 50. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.................... 51. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 52. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 53. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA ........................ 53A. Carters Lake, GA ................... 53B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL ......... 53C. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL ... Page 53D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, 10-16 AL ................................ 53E. Coosa River Navigation ............... 10-17 54. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, GA .......................... 10-17 55. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, 10-17 AL, GA, and FL ..................... 55A. Buford Dam, GA .................... 10-17 55B. George W. Andrews Lock and 10-17 Dam, AL and GA .................... 10-1575 C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA 10-18 and FL ............................. 10-185 5D. Spewrell Bluff Lake, GA ............. 10-18 55E. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL and GA ........................ 10-18 55F. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and AL ............. 56. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................. 10-18 10-19 10-19 10-20 General Investigations 57. Surveys ............................ 58. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............................. Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table l10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-1I Table 10-J Cost & Financial Statement .................. Authorizing Legislation ....... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ...... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. Deauthorized Projects ......... Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........ Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization ................ Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........ 10-26 10-32 10-42 10-42 10-43 10-43 10-44 Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 10-44 Table 10-P 10-44 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........... Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ........ Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA and FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple- Purpose Development Included in Existing Project ............ Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ........ Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, MS and AL ........ Completed Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports ......... 10-2 Page 10-20 10-20 10-21 10-21 10-22 .10-22 10-23 10-23 10-24 10-24 10-24 10-25 10-25 10-45 10-45 10-46 10-47 10-48 10-49 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-andtimber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 138,800 cubic yards of material at a cost of $368,646. Other work on channels and canals cost $209,861. Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $110,663. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $1,898,848 for new work and $3,416,612 for maintenance, a total of $5,315,460. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 30 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs and work on channels and canals amounted to $36,475. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $528,163. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 10-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 154,800 cubic yards of material at a cost of $208,629. Other work on channels and canals cost $97,703. Surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $19,650. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated 31 March 1975 and completed 26 March 1976. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $325,051 for new work and $730,391 for maintenance, a total of $1,055,442. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Al., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract dredging removed 613,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $224,817. Other work on channels and canals cost $46,148. Surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $55,283. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $311,095 for new work and $3,015,322 for maintenance, a total of $3,326,417. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 28 March 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor mated Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 236,900 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,634,196. Other work on channels and canals cost $97,724. Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $282,210. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal costs under existing project as of 30 September 1986 were $1,171,054 for new work and $7,592,668 for maintenance, a total of $8,763,722. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $166,535. 6. BILOXI HARBOR, EAST HARRISON COUNTY CANAL, MS Location. Biloxi Harbor is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, approximately 75 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana, and 45 miles west of Mobile Bay, Alabama. The City of Biloxi is situated on a peninsula bounded by Mississippi Sound on the south, Biloxi Bay on the east, and Back Bay of Biloxi on the north. Existing project. The project provides for the improvement and maintenance of the East Harrison County Canal to a 12-foot project depth, 130 feet wide, and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300- by 300-foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction was initiated and essentially completed during FY 1986 at a cost of $145,490. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of construction as of September 30, 1986 amounts to $180,715. 7. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annuat Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides essentially for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams with 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. It is proposed to replace Oliver Lock with a lock located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock would have dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway would extend 815 feet across the river. Minimum provision will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. 10-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost of relocations and other miscellaneous costs in connection with the modification of Franklin Ferry Bridge across the navigation channel in Jefferson and Walker Counties was $1,046,731. Engineering and design and land acquisition for Oliver Lock and Dam cost $1,055,336. Recreation facilities at Bankhead cost $468. Recreation attendance during CY 1985 totaled 6,672,400. Maintenance: Contractors' dredges removed 1,107,268 cubic yards of material from the river system at a cost of $243,093. Other work on channels and canals cost $1,589,858. Engineering and design of maintenance features cost $612,296. Condition surveys and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $1,505,577. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock and Dam, $454,872; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $453,204; Warrior Lock and Dam, $384,547; Oliver Lock and Dam, $521,338; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $497,420; Holt Lock and Dam, $682,929; and reservoir operation, $2,372,793. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original locks and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15, and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 6 February 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1986 for replacement of the lock was $47,258,651. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $109,919,824 for new work and $177,956,606 for maintenance, and $47,258,651 for major rehabilitation, a total of $335,135,081. 8. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and supervision and administration cost $26,531. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $118,615 for new work and $197,569 for maintenance, a total of $316,184. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 9. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 18,640 cubic yards of material at a cost of $76,554. Other work on channels and canals cost $46,149. Condition surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $42,606. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $292,864 for new work and $1,313,941 for maintenance, a total of $1 ,606,805. 10. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart I11376). Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel from the Highway 163 bridge eastward approximately 10,000 feet then southeasterly to the Mobile Ship Channel following natural depths. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6.700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging of the Dog River Channel to specifications was completed in September 1986. The city of Mobile constructed the disposal dikes and contributed $81,150 for the recreation use of the project. Federal costs during FY 1986 amounted to $124,622. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 280,500 cubic yards of material from Fowl River at a cost of $431,553. Other work on channels and canals cost $318,464. Water control management, condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $175,416. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel was initiated during this fiscal year and essentially completed in September 1986. Total Federal costs on the existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $2,120,055; $315.317 for new work and $1,804,738 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $169,993. 11. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 100-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. The west jetty is provided with a low weir section 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 500 feet by 1,500 feet located between the west jetty and the navigation channel. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contractor's dredges operating in the entrance channel to Old Pass Lagoon and East Pass removed 300,800 cubic yards of material at a cost of $300,814. Other work on channels and canals cost $329,252. Condition surveys cost $72,971. Other miscellaneous costs totaled $65,093. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $916,715 for new work and $6,968,955 for maintenance, a total of $7,885,670. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 12. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 10-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on both banks near mouth of creek, consisting of a small pile-and timber service wharf, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a marginal timber wharf and shed for commercial fishing boats on right bank of creek immediately above first bend. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition surveys, supervision and administration, and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $15,356. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1986 amounted to $352,362 of which $29,000 was for new work and $323,362 for maintenance. 13. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with for the work authorized prior to 1966. For modification of the Gulf County Canal which was authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required in connection with disposal of spoil, or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to construction and maintenance of the project including damages to wharves, piers, bridges, and other structures; provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas commensurate with depths provided in related project area; and accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other facilities as well as their maintenance. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou LaBatre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Maintenance dredging removed 447,700 cubic yards of material at a cost of $277,572. Other work on channels and canals cost $240,687. Condition surveys cost $209,452. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $93,617. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Maintenance dredging removed 621,600 cubic yards of material at a cost of $770,732. Other work on channels and canals cost $492,455. Condition surveys, $42,050; supervision and administration, $205,482; and miscellaneous, $48,167. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Hired labor costs for bank stabilization and diking of disposal areas were $268,479. Condition surveys cost $93,494. Engineering and design, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $76,573. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Costs for the year include engineering and design, condition surveys and miscellaneous work, $20,370. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Costs for the year included condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration and miscellaneous, $176,592. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Condition surveys, water control management and supervision and ad ministration cost $120,947. In addition, compliance inspections cost $222,712; direct charges to Mobile Area Office cost $150,559; and direct charges to Panama City Area Office were $6,052. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which is deferred for restudy. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total costs of the 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT existing project to September 30, 1986 were $51,589,385, of which $6,434,694 was for new work and $45,154,691 for maintenance. 14. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 40-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River: (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek: (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence to a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22- foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep. 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin: and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2.000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U. S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane o1 reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) A General Design Memorandum has been approved at the Division level modifying the project dimensions which would provide an entrance channel of 57 feet by 600 feet about 7.8 miles long and a bay channel of 55 feet by 400 feet about 29 miles long. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement has been signed by the local sponsor to construct the project in increments. The first increment will either be, 1) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel from the McDuffie Coal Terminal south to the mouth of the bay and then a 47-foot by 600-foot channel across Mobile Bar or, 2) a 57-foot by 600-foot channel across Mobile Bar and north to a transshipment facility located just inside the mouth of the bay. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for Mobile Harbor and monitoring Theodore Channel cost $89,275. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 6,361,501 cubic yards of material from Mobile River Channel, Garrows Bend, and from Mobile Bay, all at a cost of $7,120,050. Other work on channels and canals.,cost $140,949. Condition surveys cost $941,742. Water control management, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $593,931. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, which was essentially completed in August 1981. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $61,507,655 for new work and $78,372,052 for maintenance, a total of $139,879,707. Contributed funds expended amounted to $6,133,008 for new work and $846,706 for maintenance. 15. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart I1389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in St. Andrew Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay 10-9 REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2,896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 270,800 cubic yards of material at a cost of $379,067. Other work on channels and canals cost $101,680. Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $140,140. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $1,434,485 for new work and $6,573,278 for maintenance, a total of $8,007,763. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 16. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 4,237,000 cubic yards of material from the Channel, River and Sound at a total Federal cost of $2,773,234. Condition surveys cost $250,000. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $139,504. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. Total Federal costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $5,668,543 for new work and $35,920,750 for maintenance, a total of $41,589,293. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $1,756,426. 17. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel: (d) an innerharbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long: (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf: and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4.400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, water control management and miscellaneous costs amounted to $20,328. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except those features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1986 were $875,005 for new work and $6,049,622 for maintenance, a total of $6,924,627. 18. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1. I feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 266.600 cubic yards of material at a cost of $575,954. Other work on channels and canals cost $296,006. Condition surveys and miscellaneous costs amounted to $72,735. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1986 were $629,860 for new work and $5,947,424 for maintenance, a total of $6,577,284. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 19. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Location. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections. (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift Of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Estimated (1986) Federal cost for new work is $1,798,000,000, including $8,600,000 for work by the U.S. Coast Guard, and $9,400,000 for National Park Service; plus, $153,000,000 non-Federal cost for relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was 10-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local coooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held 5 December 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30, 1986, only eleven such facilities were operational, while four were under construction, and six more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total cost of new work during the fiscal year was $24,174,109 of which $8,560 was for work on Demopolis Lake; $70,306 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $5,030,584 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $4,829,981 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $1,658,287 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam. Canal section cost included: Lock A, $2,243,524; Lock B, $556,740; Lock C, $3,567,615; Lock D, $1,300,734; Lock E, $349,211. Other costs associated with the overall project amounted to $4,558,567. Contributed funds amounted to $4,415. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 303,600 cubic yards of material from the river system at a cost of $1,576,744. Cost for operation of the completed portion of the project during the year amounted to $13,171,967, which included general charges of $6,583,057; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $301,147; Aliceville Lock and Dam, $334,753; Columbus Lock and Dam, $341,174; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $493,843; Lock A, $317,192; Lock B, $353,881; Lock C, $301,047; Lock D, $385,485; Lock E, $310,705; Bay Springs, $378,082; lake charges of $3,071,601. Recreation attendance for CY 1985 totaled 3,273,857 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $973,129,909 for new work, and $47,064,302 for maintenance for a total of $1,020,194,211. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is about 95 percent complete. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $318,164. (See Table 10-H.) 22. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) 23. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects deauthorized under Section 12, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress, as amended. (See Table 10-G.) Beach Erosion Control 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 25. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Studies conducted under Section 103,1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $1,140. (See Table 10-I.) Flood Control 26. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and topof- conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design of public use facilities cost 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT $119,906. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $877,052. No flood control benefits were attributed to the project during FY 1986. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1985 totaled 1,082,237 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $9,739,172 for new work and $8,272,618 for maintenance, a total of $18,01 1,790. 27. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MS Location. The project is on Tallahala Creek, 81.1 miles above its mouth, in Jasper County, Mississippi, 13 miles north of Laurel. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The dam will consist of a compacted earth fill 8,000 feet long, with top elevation 343.5 feet above national geodetic datum, or a maximum 71.5 feet above streambed elevation, with a top width of 18 feet, and a 300-foot long saddle dike with maximum height of 15 feet in the left abutment. The spillway which is 6,000 feet northeast of the left abutment, will consist of an unpaved, freeoverflow type, 500 feet long, with fixed crest at elevation 335.0. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam will serve an 8-foot diameter, horseshoe-shaped concrete conduit. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 306.5 will have an area of 4,000 acres and a total capacity of 63,000 acre-feet of which 35,900 acrefeet between elevations 288.5 and 302.0 will be used for water supply, 20,000 acre-feet between elevations 302.0 and 306.5 will be used for water quality improvement, and 7,100 acre-feet below elevation 288.5 will consist of dead storage. A volume varying seasonally from 50,000 to 70,000 acre-feet between elevations 306.5 and 315.0 will be reserved for flood storage. Estimated Federal cost (1986) is $120,000,000. (See Table-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to reimburse the United States for all costs allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended; and one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. In addition, local interests are required to reimburse the United States for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost allocated to water supply, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife areas and facilities for initial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land and damages and engineering and design cost $3,931. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 28. AIRPORT ROAD BRIDGE, FRANKSTOWN, MS Location. The project is in northeastern Mississippi. The Airport Road Bridge crosses Twenty Mile Creek and is located about 0.5 mile north of Frankstown, in Prentiss County, Mississippi. Existing Project. The project provides for streambank protection along a 300-foot reach of the stream. The creek's banks and bottom were graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. A 3-foot-high weir was placed just downstream from the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local sponsor to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous work cost $504. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was essentially completed in December 1984 at a total cost of $215,860. 29. BIG BROWN CREEK AND TRIBUTARY, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located at the Marietta- Hazeldell Road bridges crossing Big Brown Creek and Big Brown Creek tributary located about 2.0 and 2.2 miles, respectively, east-north-east of Marietta in Prentiss County, MS. Existing Project. The authorized project provides for emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottoms of the channels to retard erosion at the described project site. The banks and bottoms' will be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on six inches of bedding material and filter fabric. The placement of the riprap at the bridge crossing Big Brown Creek would begin 50 feet downstream from the centerline of the bridge and will extend upstream for 100 feet. The placement of the riprap at the bridge crossing Big Brown Creek tributary will begin 60 feet downstream from the centerline of the bridge and will extend upstream for 100 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preliminary work in the channels and miscellaneous costs amounted to $26,461. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. 30. BOLIGEE CANAL, BOLIGEE, AL Location. Boligee, Alabama is located in southern Greene County about 40 miles west of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Boligee Canal originates about five miles northeast of Boligee and flows southwesterly to a point north of Boligee where it turns west and flows for about 1.5 miles before it enters a natural channel, approxi- 10-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 mately two miles upstream from its mouth on the Tombigbee River. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing and snagging Boligee Canal from its confluence with the Tombigbee River upstream to mile 5.84. Work will be done from within the channel and extend from top bank to top bank, an approximate width of 20 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Clearing and snagging within the channel and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $162,554. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated and essentially completed during FY 1986. 31. CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, EUFAULA, AL Location. The project is located at the Alabama State Docks Barge Port on the Chattahoochee River in Eufaula, AL. Existing project. The authorized project provides for shoreline protection consisting of riprap placed on the slopes for 300 feet along the State Docks and a 60 linear foot sheet pile cutoff wall driven behind the docks wharf. Work will prevent further erosion and loss of fill material under the wharf. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Preliminary work on channel and miscellaneous costs amounted to $14,165. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. 32. COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE OVER LEAF RIVER, MAHNED, MS Location. The project is located at the bridge that crosses the Leaf River 0.45 miles upstream of its confluence with Tallahala Creek and about one mile north of Mahned, MS. Existing project. The streambank erosion project provides for the protection of bridge piers undermined by the river at a county road bridge near Mahned, MS. Protection was achieved by construction of a bank revetment extending 400 feet upstream and 200 feet downstream from the bridge. A blanket of riprap was used under the bridge to prevent further erosion around the undermined piers. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project has been turned over to local sponsor to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was initiated in July 1979 and completed in November 1979. 33. GOODFOOD CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located at Goodfood Creek Road about 1.5 miles east of U.S. Forest Service's Davis Lake recreation area in the northern portion of Chickasaw County, MS. Existing project. The authorised project provides for bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preliminary work on the project cost $22,699. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. 34. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River, upstream of the Highway 39 bridge in Gainesville, AL. Existing project. The authorized project provides for slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Condition surveys and soil investigations were completed at a cost of $1,254. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project will continue during FY 1987 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1988. 35. HOUSTON SCHOOL ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS Location. Houston School Road Bridge crosses Tynes Branch, a Twenty Mile Creek tributary, and is located about two miles west of Houston in northwest Itawamba County, MS. Existing project. The project provides for bridge protection using riprap extending 62 feet downstream of centerline of bridge and extending upstream for 99 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Installation of riprap and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $20,738. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was initiated in FY 1986 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. 36. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The Leaf River forms the east boundary of 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT the city of Hattiesburg, the county seat of Forrest County, located in south-central Mississippi. The river separates Hattiesburg from the smaller city of Petal. Bowie River flows southeasterly along the northern boundary of Hattiesburg and joins the Leaf River at the northeast corner of the city. Existing project. The project provides for channel snagging, overbank clearing within the flood plains, riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work will also include installation of a flood warning system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Installation of riprap protection, overbank clearing and miscellaneous costs amounted to $1,067,472. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work on the project is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. Construction costs as of September 30, 1986 amounted to $1,067,472. 37. MARTIN CREEK, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located at the Altitude Road bridge crossing Martin Creek about 6.7 miles eastsoutheast of Booneville in Prentiss County, MS. Existing project. The project provides for emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Altitude Road bridge crossing Martin Creek. The banks and bottom will be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. Two hundred linear feet of barbed wire fence will have to be moved. Two acres of land will be required for construction of the project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Preliminary work on the project during FY 1986 cost $14,644. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. 38. MURDER CREEK, EAST BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of East Brewton along the left bank of Murder Creek in the vicinity of Forrest and Snowden Avenues. Existing project. The project consists of non-structural measures of flood plain evacuation and flood proofing of selected buildings for the reduction of flood damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Project turned over to local sponsor to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $530. Condition at end of fiscal year. This non-structural plan was completed June 1984 and entire project completed September 1985. Total costs to date have amounted to $903,474. 39. MURDER AND BURNT CORN CREEKS, BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of Brewton, AL near the confluence of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks in the commercial district of downtown Brewton. Previous project. A limited stream clearing and snagging project was completed in 1980 on portions of both creeks to remove obstructions to flows. This interim measure was undertaken to reduce flooding in Brewton and East Brewton. Further, an evacuation plan for East Brewton was implemented under the Section 205 authority. The project involved removal of damageable structures from the low-lying flood plain of Murder Creek. Existing project. the authorized non-structural project provides for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate acquisitions during FY 1986 cost $234,624. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate purchases are currently being conducted and will continue through FY 1987. 40. NOXUBEE RIVER RELIEF BRIDGE, SHUQUALAK, MS Location. The Noxubee River relief bridge is located on the Shuqualak-Mahorner Road near Shuqualak, Mississippi. The Noxubee River at this location flows through Noxubee County, which is located in east central Mississippi. The project is about 48 miles south of Columbus, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides for streambank protection at Noxubee River relief bridge consisting of grading and protecting of banks with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. This would preclude any erosion from high velocities or from sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $6,429. 10-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.SI ARMY 1986 Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in July 1986 and project is scheduled for completion in November 1986. 41. SEWERLINE PROTECTION, VALLEY, AL Location. Valley, Alabama is located on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River in the southeast corner of Chambers County. The West Point Lake and Dam is located approximately 11 miles up river from Valley and controls a drainage area of approximately 3600 square miles. A sanitary sewage line and pumping station were built in 1972 to provide service from approximately 200 homes and several businesses located near Valley. This line serves as the only sewage transport for this area. Existing project. The project provides for the restoration of approximately 1600 linear feet of streambank. This will consist of placing approximately 1550 cubic yards of No. 5 riprap on 4445 square yards of filter fabric. Any reshaping of the bank will be done by placing backfill material as opposed to cutting the existing streambank. The reshaped bank will then be grassed. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction costs amounted to $150,482. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 17 September 1985. The project was essentially completed in FY 1986. 42. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA Location. The project is located in Marietta, Georgia in Cobb County which is in the north-central section of Georgia, just north-northwest of Atlanta. Sope Creek is a small tributary of the Chattahoochee River and flows generally from northwest to southeast from its beginning in the city of Marietta. Existing project. The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia. The project provides for both a structural and nonstructural component. The structural component provides for clearing and snagging of the creek. This would involve the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs and any underbrush less than 12 inches in diameter from a strip 30 feet wide on each side of the creek and removing all trees, shrubs and underbrush within the creek banks. Snagging would involve the removal of all fallen trees and debris which are in the creek. The nonstructural component provides for the evacuation of 13 structures located on the west side of the creek within the Fox Hill subdivision. The project provides for purchase and removal of the structures. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Land and damages and engineering and design costs amounted to $314,854. Condition at end of fiscal year. The nonstructural component as of 30 September 1986; 10 structures were acquired and removed. The structural portion, clearing and snagging, will be readvertised in March 1987. 43. TALLABINELLA CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located along Tallabinella Creek at Pleasant Valley Road about 3.5 miles northwest of the city of Okolona in northeast Chickasaw County. Existing project. The project provides for bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Preliminary work on the project during FY 1986 cost $22,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1987. 44. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MISS. AND ALA. Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line, by clearing the banks of trees and underbrush to flood stage, the removal of drift jams and the excavation of 13 cutoff channels; and for additional channel improvements and related works for flood control of the Tombigbee River and tributaries above the mouth of and including the Noxubee River in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, to protect people and valuable agricultural property from overflow waters of the Tombigbee River. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $132,513. Routine maintenance of channels and canals cost $29,358. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $2,227. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. The over-all project, as modified, is about 55 percent completed. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $134,801 for new work and $2,378,094 for maintenance, a total of $2,512,895. 45. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1986) for new work is $51,446,900; consisting of $49,000,000 Federal funds, and $2,446,900 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion; and contribute $12,146,600 in cash or equivalent work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Provided riprap armor for bank stabilization and erosion control at Twenty Mile Creek at a total cost of $3,126,782. Engineering and design costs for Luxapalila Creek and Tibbee River Basin were $170,432. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1986 was $18,222,988 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $63,281. 46. U.S. HIGHWAY 11 BRIDGE, FOSTERS, AL Location. The U.S. Highway 11 Bridge is located near the community of Fosters, in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama and crosses over the Black Warrior River at navigation mile 321.0 The bridge is about 10 miles southwest of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides for slope protection by placing riprap along a 240-foot reach of the left descending bank at the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs amounted to $170,245. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 13 September 1985. Project was essentially completed in FY 1986. 47. WOLF CREEK, U.S. HIGHWAY 45 BRIDGE, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS Location. The U.S. Highway 45 bridge is located in Prentiss County, Mississippi in the northeastern part of the state. The project is located approximately 75 miles north of Columbus, Mississippi. The U.S. Highway 45 bridge crosses Wolf Creek at mile 0.9 above the mouth of the creek. Existing project. The project provides for slope protection under the U.S. 45 bridge. The banks would be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. Threefoot high weirs would be placed just downstream from the bridge to provide a backwater effect and.a section of riprap at the weir would be grouted. (See Table l10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with and turned over to local sponsor to maintain. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous costs amounted to $505. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was essentially completed in December 1984 at a total cost of $154,641. 48. OLD HIGHWAY 82 BRIDGE, COLUMBUS, MS Location. The Old Highway 82 bridge is located at Columbus, Mississippi in east-central Mississippi and crosses the Tombigbee River at river mile 364.96. It is about 131 miles northeast of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides protection along the right descending bank. The slope protection would consist of 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and a filter fabric. The riprap placement would begin approximately 140 feet downstream of the centerline of the bridge and extend upstream along the right descending bank for 330 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs totaled $84,286. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 25 July 1985. Project was essentially completed in FY 1986. 49. INTERSTATE 59 BRIDGES, FOSTERS, AL Location. The Interstate 59 bridges are located near the community of Fosters in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama and crosses over the Black Warrior River at 10-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 navigation mile 320.5 The bridges are about 10 miles southwest of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides streambank protective measures at the bridges. Bank stabilization would consist of placing riprap along a 195-foot reach of the left descending bank at the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction cost $1 19,039. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 13 September 1985. Project was essentially completed in FY 1986. 50. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, Sun and Trim Cane Creeks, Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Gordon's Creek, Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pond and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Georgia; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Valparaiso, Florida; Harrison County, Mississippi; Lorraine Road, Biloxi, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 86 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $27,699. Total cost to September 30, 1986. was $379,300 charged to maintenance. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E) 52. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Pre-authorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public Law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 53. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non- Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The present phase of improvement provides for construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiplepurpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design of recreation facilities at Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam cost $793. Public use areas at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam cost $38,776. Engineering and design for Coosa River navigation segment amounted to $5,745. Miscellaneous administrative costs at Carters amounted to $866. Total cost of new work amounted to $46,180. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 120,100 cubic yards of material from the river system at a cost of $397,135. General charges for recreation, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $1,399,302. Coosa River Reservoir operations cost $1,055,220 and lock operations $407,877. In addition, operation of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam cost $1,858,604, Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, $2,392,094; Carters Lake, $2,507,840; all for a total maintenance cost of $10,018,072. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962,on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was essentially completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is essentially complete. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1986 are $413,226,247, including $305,733,354 for new work and $107,492,893 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 53A. CARTERS LAKE, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a power house on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pumpgenerating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acrefeet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous administrative costs totaled $866. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration incidental thereto cost $2,507,840. Gross power generation amounted to 460,156,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1986, of which 432,642,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1985 totaled 893,000 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1986 are $132,491,479, including $111,140,340 for new work and $21,351,139 for maintenance. 53B. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location.The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is at elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description 10-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: none. Recreation attendance during CY 1985 totaled 666,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. 53C. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous administrative costs totaled $793. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $1,858,604. Gross power generation amounted to 211,722,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986, of which 205,526,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at R.E. "Bob" Woodruff Lake during CY 1985 totaled 2,469,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is essentially complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1986 were $100,191,192, including $83,360,800 for new work and $16,830,392 for maintenance. 53D. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Total cost of new work amounted to $38,776 for public use facilities. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration incidental thereto cost $2,392,094. Gross power generation amounted to 274,532,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986, of which 270,200,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1985 totaled 2,355,968 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operation in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1986 were $63,122,507 for new work and $28,826,801 for maintenance, a total of $91,949,308. 53E. COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama- Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on 27 January 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The water-way to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The estimated 1986 cost for the waterway from Montgomery to Gadsden is $1,359,000,000 of which $1,304,000,000 is Federal and $55,000,000 non- Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funding was initiated in FY 1978 for preconstruction planning. FY 1986 costs were $5,745 for engineering, design, supervision and administration. In addition, general investigations funds expended amounted to $11,543 for 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT advanced engineering and design. 54. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design of public use facilities cost $7,671. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $5,746,764. Gross power generation at Allatoona Reservoir amounted to 68,852,700 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986 of which 66,260,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1985 totaled 9,952,100 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1986 were $35,709,084 for new work and $52,834,1 17 for maintenance, a total of $88,543.201. 55. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles, to be accomplished by dredging, contraction works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River, three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River, and minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. The authorized but unconstructed projects of Lazer Creek, Lower Auchumpkee Creek and Spewrell Bluff would have storage for hydropower and flood control. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme 10-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of cut off wall under Walter F. George Dam to correct seepage cost $468,153. Recreation facilities for various reservoirs cost $196. Maintenance: The contractor's dredge removed 827,600 cubic yards (net) of material from the river system at a cost of $427,512. Other costs incidental to the overall project amounted to $3,098,355. Operation of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $383,842. Operations and maintenance locks and dams: Buford Dam cost $7,328,659; Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, $4,910,998; Walter F. George Lock and Dam, $7,347,633; and West Point Lake, $5,288,528. Total FY 1986 cost for entire project was $28,785,723, of which $196 was for new work, and $28,785,527 was for operation and maintenance. Detailed information on operations and costs applicable to the individual dam projects is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Work remaining to complete the project consists of completion of recreational facilities at Lake Sidney Lanier, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point Dam; design and construction of Lazer Creek, Spewrell Bluff and Lower Auchumpkee Creek Dam. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project. 55A. BUFORD DAM, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $7,328,659. Gross power generation amounted to 111,078,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986, of which 109,169,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1985 totaled 16,263,700 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. 55B. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreational attendance at George W. Andrews Lock and Dam during CY 1985 totaled 399,064 recreational user days. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. 55C. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation: and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acrefeet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoildisposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River; and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs at completed project amounted to $796. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $4,910,998. Gross power generation amounted to 207,707,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986, of which 204,238,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1985 totaled 4,203,000 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The lock was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. 55D. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA Location. The dam site is on the Flint River in Talbot and Upson Counties, Georgia, about nine miles west of Thomaston. The lake will extend into Meriwether, Pike, and Spalding Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: a dam 2,475 feet long with maximum height of 211.0 feet, a 326-foot long gated spillway with six tainter gates 38 feet high and 45 feet wide, concrete non-overflow abutments 1,149 feet across the main channel including 268 feet for the power intake, with an earth-rock fill dike 580 feet long to high ground on the left bank, a 420-foot saddle dike on the left bank, and a power plant with three 50,000-kw units located in the left bank. The reservoir would have an area of 13,330 acres at maximum power pool elevation of 695 national geodedic datum. Usable storage of 241,510 acre-feet would be provided for power generation between elevations 665 and 695 and 195,010 acre-feet would be reserved between elevations 695 and 706.5 for flood storage. Approved estimated (1986) cost is $426,000,000, of which $302,920,000 is for construction and design, and $123,080,000 for lands, damages, and relocations. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interest must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improve- 10-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 ment, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 55E. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,400 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. The approved (1986) estimate for rehabilitation work to control seepage is $14,500,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing work on construction of cutoff wall under dam to correct seepage cost $468,153. Minor administrative costs totaled $7. Maintenance of the project for operation and care was $7,347,633. Gross power generation amounted to 249,542,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986, of which 243,272,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1985 totaled 7,327,247 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. 55F. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravitytype concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed on operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs totaled $1,432. Maintenance: Operation and care of the project cost $5,288,528. Gross power generation amounted to 104,630,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1986 of which 100,449,200 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1985 totaled 6,399,300 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was essentially complete at the end of FY 1984. 56. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. General Investigations 57. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,263,602 of which $573,209 was for navigation studies; $298,263 for flood damage prevention studies; $130,897 for special studies; $15 for review of authorized projects; $28,297 for special investigations; $25,447 for coordination with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; $1,140 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests; $206,334 for supplemental pre-authorization studies: Dalton, GA and Edinburg Lake, MS. Continuation of planning and engineering included $487,983 for Mobile Harbor; $1,153,859 for Oliver Lock and Dam; $29,906 for Panama City Beaches; $256,143 for Sowashee Creek; $36,500 for Three Mile Creek; and $5,575 for Village Creek; for a total of $1,969,966. Advance engineering and design includes $6,521 for Gulfport Harbor and $11,543 for the Montgomery to Gadsden Coosa River navigation channel for a total of $18,064. Contributed funds required for an authorized Federal project in Bayou La Batre, AL totaled $30,860. 58. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $230,988. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1986.) For listing of previous reports see page 10-50 Annual Report for 1974, page 10-44 of FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-46 of FY 1977 Annual Report, and page 10-48 of FY 1978 Annual Report, and page 10-43 of 1983 Annual Report. The National Program for inspection of non-Federal dams cost $1,102. 10-25 TABLE 10-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. ADalachicola Bay New Work: FL 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, AL (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Biloxi Harbor, East Harrison County Canal, MS 7. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 8. Bon Secour River, AL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 32,000 55,370 44,000 -3,884 25,000 15,357 4,000 753,896 52,000 50,089 704,505 195,823 455,000 455,263 5,000 41,048 75,000 96,785 220,000 224,570 501,000 514,885 3,605,000 153,586 85,000 77,296 60,000 41,082 25,000 22,778 24,000 22,460 165,000 151,489 61,300 35,225 35,000 1,797,450 14,137,473 15,962,000 14,087,000 13,862,619 16,904,377 13,553,608 19 17,891 10,000 16,632 895 20,000 22,452 683,000 689,170 27,000 36,475 - 2,033,461' - 2,033,461' 3,587,8072 3,585,3792 549,687 528,163 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,7013 322,000 731,533 325,982 730,391 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 311,095 - 311,095 326,000 326,248 2,001,0( 2,014,13 166,53 166,53 140,00 145,49 3,016,852 3,015,322 10,5004 10,5004 - 1,215,4365 - 1,215,4365 )0 7,690,1066 30 7,689,1776 - 102,600 - 102,600 36 166,536 5 166,535 )0 201,300 )0 180,715 2,850,000 11l2,878,9427 2,102,535 110,526,7557 8,424,000 178,200,6768 9,317,927 178,006,6068 -62,000 48,065,300 482 47,258,651 - 118,615 - 118,615 23,000 198,478 26,531 197,569 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp: Cost 9. Dauphin Island, New Work: Bay, AL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 10. Dog and Fowl New Work: Rivers, AL Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost II. East Pass Channel New Work: From Gulf of Approp. Mexico into Chocta- Cost whatchee Bay, FL (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 12. Fly Creek, AL New Work: Approp. Cost 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border - 9,700 - 9,700 - 292,864 - 292,864 38,000 66,153 -32,000 16,930 96,000 93.672 2,037 36,000 39.417 191,000 187,526 2,200 163,000 165.309 - 217,000 - 124,622 922,000 925,433 81,150 55,893 1,315,026 1,313,941 407,695 315,317 1,805,593 1,804,738 197,450 169,993 - 916,715 - 916,715 625,000 606,764 Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 14. Mobile Harbor, AL New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 626,000 610,614 - 109,000 - 106,550 2,914,000 1,400,841 84,000 723,834 280,000 553,146 4,793,000 2,941,782 -8,000 343,829 3,009,000 4,536,371 31,404 485,000 717,401 2,908,700 5,172,873 761,000 761,668 695,000 627,559 15,000 2,835 5,141,000 5,175,525 15,000 19,448 4,805,000 4,819,696 805,000 834,706 435,000 431,355 588,000 6,969,160 768,130 6,968,955 - 398,000 - 398,000 - 29,000 - 29,000 1,000 323,621 15,356 323,362 - 6,480,2999 - 6,480,2999 3,502,000 45,228,722' � 3.515.992 45.219.82810 130,00 89,27 2,685,00 1,968,03 8,646,00 8,796,67 617,00 620,88 )0 68,247,937's 5 68,190,759" )0 7,017,500 9 6,133,008 0 82,526,183'14 2 82,468,723'14 - 817,000 - 846,706 - 1,638,045's - 1,638,045's )0 7,087,33416 7 7,086,88216 - 80,000 - 80,000 10-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 19. Waterway Con- New Work: necting Tombigbee Approp. and Tennessee Rivers Cost AL, and MS Maint: Approp. Cost 26. Okatibbee Lake, New Work: MS Approp. Cost 27. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, MS 28. Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS 29. Big Brown Creek, Prentiss County, MS 30. Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 4,143,000 1,986,816 196,590 565 2,066,000 4,587,968 300,000 496,024 3,127,000 3,150,431 770,028 735,831 - 6,572,985' - 6,572,985' 3,154,000 36,141,420' s 3,162,738 36,133,37418 75,456 75,456 1,811,424 1,756;426 - 1,469,693'9 - 1,469,69319 42,145 2,032,000 1,967,593 68,000 145,898 19,000 20,328 6,177,23820 6,176,2712o - 629,860 - 629,860 1,271,000 484,340 -62,000 743,601 60,000 51,595 936,000 944,695 5,948,217 5,947,424 - 510,000 - 510,000 - 10,325 - 10,325 120,684,000 103,645,625 5,474,000 5,430,959 20,000 22,505 874,000 825,795 60,967 155,107,000 88,011,301 7,456,000 7,447,345 620,000 86,839 1,008,000 1,184,145 1,809 - 221,300 - 19,691 -19,750,000 43,785,515 10,291,000 11,170,456 -100 421,348 859,000 813,827 593 -5,440 195,665 26,496,000 24,174,109 13,159,425 13,171,967 119,906 793,000 877,052 3,931 1,000,278,20021 973,242,11521 47,682,75622 47,298,633 22 9,739,528 9,739,172 8,287,892 8,272,618 3,945,757 3,926,626 - 215,860 504 215,860 - 52,500 - 26,46 I1 - 163,600 - 162,554 31. Chattahoochee New Work: River, Eufaula, AL Approp. Cost 32. County Road Bridge,New Work: Mahned, MS Approp. Cost 33. Goodfood Creek, New Work: Chickasaw Co., MS Approp. Cost 52,500 14,165 52,500 26,461 163,600 162,554 52,500 14,165 - 231,618 - 231,618 37,500 22,699 37,500 22,699 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 34. Hwy. 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL 35. Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 36. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS 37. Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS 38. Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL 39. Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 40. Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS 41. Sewerline Protection Valley, AL 42. Sope Creek, Marietta, GA 43. Tallabinella Creek Chickasaw County, MS 44. Tombigbee River (East Fork)., MS & AL 45. Tombigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 46. U.S. Hwy 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL 47. Wolf Creek, U.S. Hwy 45 Bridge, Prentiss Co., MS 48. Old Hwy 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS 49. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL 53. Alabama-Coosa Rivers. AL and GA New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - 50,000 - 1,254 - 42,300 - 20,738 - 1,340,000 - 1,067,472 - 32,500 - 14,644 542,500 404,471 -35,000 108,490 -5,000 -3,91 1 50,000 1,254 42,300 20,738 1,340,000 1,067,472 32,500 14,644 - 903,474 530 903,474 - 550,000 - 234,624 27,500 10,341 - 310,00 - 9,92 227,000 71,996 1,495,000 1,289,170 312,00 463,70 1,400,0(0 2,494,13 14,00 13,16 14,543 - 185,000 - 17,387 )0 1.110,000 1 833,383 )0 449,000 1 452,213 )0 2,000,000 36 985,330 0 5 25,00 6,42 150,48 -20,00 314,85 35,00 22,90 153,00 164,09 2,297,00 3,297,21 364 - 210,000 - 18,829 215,000 15,430 27,500 18,564 -15,00 170,24 -60,359 138,706 135,000 35,117 - 160,000 - 15,179 514,522 474,340 100,000 608,670 84,476 550,000 234,624 52,500 31,313 )0 '9 - 185,000 2 167,869 )0 1,400,000 4 1,158,158 )0 35,000 10 22,900 - 134,801 - 134,801 )0 2,380,100 8 2,378,094 )0 18,606,225 4 18,222,988 - 94,700 - 63,281 )0 195,000 5 189,074 - 154,641 505 154,641 84,286 -17,500 I19,039 162,500 137,967 142,500 134,218 -293,000 309,497,63023 46,180 309,445,8372; 9,775,000 1 1,74 1,500 11,224,006 9,346,000 110,643,96024 9,034,561 13,176,904 10,795,482 10,018,072 110,267,2232' 4 10-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 53A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA 53B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL 53C. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL 53D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL 53E. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 54. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, GA 55. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 55A. Lake Sidney Lanier, GA 55B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 55C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA and FL 55D. Spewrell Bluff Lake GA -84,000 43,083 312 2,235,000 2,522,500 1,952,950 2,806,966 - -106,000 111,140,340 - 866 111,140,340 2,321,000 2,361,379 2,361,600 21,390,900 2,507,840 21,351,139 - 27,997,450 - 27,997,450 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -300,000 239,173 1,755,000 1,994,862 400,000 306,625 3,450,000 3,774,011 62,560 70,000 169,716 4,776,000 5,666,044 1,702,000 1,959,105 12,150 1,759,000 1,776,575 51,806 2,499,000 2,544,735 20,520 -7,000 65,389 5,149,000 4,816,217 -1,500 28,177 -187,000 83,360,800 793 83,360,800 1,858,000 16,937,778 1,858,604 16,830,392 - 63,125,300 38,776 63,122,507 2,360,000 28,960,965 2,392,094 28,826,801 - 15,035,400 5,745 14,986,400 - 35,709,08525 7,671 35,709,08425 5,278,000 53,089,523 5,746,764 52,834,117 - 339,094,09326 196 338,993,34226 600,000 164,544 1,891,000 1,843,208 -1,478 22,500 2,302,000 2,364,854 244,213 201,000 668,140 4,298,000 3,996,293 208,973 923,386 19,006,000 18,162,136 4,800,000 1,234,848 155,782 471,532 5,078,500 4,553,188 6,400,000 4,439,449 3,000 166,190 5,342,000 6,298,978 4,105,313 -1,500 10,398 6,948,000 6,879,884 30 30 30 30 -1,500 40,247 3,062,000 3,205,787 -1,000 292 3,505 3,810,000 4,119,000 4,057,310 4,154,005 - -10,948 -700,000 10,500,000 468,153 10,247,763 - 53,030,03828 -2,038 53,035,37828 7,152,000 62,843,907 7,328,659 62,612,828 - 13,038,42729 - 13,038,42729 30 30 - 48,017,85831 796 47,978,749~3' 4,768,000 50,252,081 4,910,998 50,119,171 - 2,158,652 - 2,158,652 10-30 22,362,000 26,743,000 27,337,000 275,132,36427 24,142,063 26,228,528 28,785,527 274,205,51827 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See iSne cTteioxnt Project Total Cost to Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept. 30, 1986 55E. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. 54,691 - - - 88,295,77932 AL and GA Cost 402,094 8,483 14,274 7 88,295,78032 Maint: Approp. 3,583,000 4,620,000 5,779,000 7,063,000 62,169,564 Cost 3,561,801 4,544,659 5,947,570 7,347,633 61,968,123 Major Rehab: Approp. 4,800,000 6,400,000 - -700,000 10,500,000 Cost 1,234,848 4,439,449 4,105,313 468,153 10,247,763 55F. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - 1,700,000 10,948 - 131,557,359 Basin, GA and AL Cost 9,513 1,784,140 - 1,432 131,501,360 Maint: Approp. 3,040,500 3,103,000 3,934,000 5,266,000 29,631,300 Cost 2,952,188 3,130,304 3,958,108 5,288,528 29,366,463 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,046,679 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. I11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes 2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,231,284 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 10-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. I111,9 83' July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 1969' Oct. 27. 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. (See Section I of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels, 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channels is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about I mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR(Sec. 107) DPR(Sec. 107) DPR(Sec. 107) H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' August 8, 1985' July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sept. 19, 1890 Sept. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500-foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, EAST HARRISON COUNTY CANAL, MS (See Section 6 of Text) The project provides for the improvement and maintenance of the East Harrison County Canal. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL. (See Section 7 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887. Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 10-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 June 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 July 30, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 May 16, 1963' Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 19, 1969' July 3, 1930 Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL. (See Section 8 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift'Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north.of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Islanid Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL. (See Section 10 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL. (See Section 11 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.45, 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 97-377 Public Law 98-63 The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1985 (P.L. 99-88) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. 10-34 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Aug. 26, 1937 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 23, 1942 June 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 13 of Text) APALACHICOLA BAY TO ST. MARKS RIVER, FL. A channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachicola Bay, Fl., via St. George Sound, Carrabelle, Crooked, and Ochlockonee Rivers and Ochlockonee and Apalachee Bays to St. Marks River, Fl. APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL., TO MOBILE BAY, AL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (P.L. 96-367) H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 291, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. 10-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 15, 1985 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' June 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 MOBILE HARBOR, AL. (See Section 14 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the Mobile Bay Channel to turning basin at the inner end of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL. (See Section 15 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS. (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on 10-36 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) The Energy and Water Development Approp. Act 1985 (P.L. 99-88) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d-Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 July 11, 1983' June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 27, 1962 Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, thence 22 by 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth I mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 x 80 feet extending about 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL. (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Modified improvement of Bayou Chico, FL. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 743, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-37 Documents REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 June 7, 1968 April 9, 19844 April 30, 19864 March 24, 19863 July 25, 19864 January 26, 19774 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL. (See Section 18 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemound jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, AL. AND MS. (See Section 19 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS. (See Section 26 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control. water supply, water quality control, and recreation. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MS. (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. AIRPORT ROAD BRIDGE, FRANKSTOWN, MS. (See Section 28 of Text) The project provides for placing riprap protection on the sides and bottom of the channel at the bridge and constructing a grouted riprap weir section just downstream of the bridge. BIG BROWN CREEK AND TRIBUTARY, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS (See Section 29 of Text) Emergency streambank protection to the banks and bottoms of the channels to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridges crossing Big Brown Creek and Big Brown Creek tributary. BOLIGEE CANAL, BOLIGEE, AL (See Section 30 of Text) Clearing and snagging Boligee Canal from its confluence with the Tombigbee River upstream to mile 5.84. Work to be done from within channel and extend from top bank to top bank, an approximate width of 20 feet. CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, EUFAULA, AL (See Section 31 of Text) Shoreline protection consisting of riprap placed on the slopes for 300 feet along the State Docks and a 60 linear foot sheet pile cutoff wall driven behind the docks wharf. Work will prevent further erosion and loss of fill material under the wharf. COUNTY ROAD BRIDGE OVER LEAF RIVER, MAHNED, MS (See Section 32 of Text) Streambank erosion protection of bridge piers undermined by the Leaf River at a county road bridge near Mahned, MS. 10-38 S. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 143, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 208) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICTTABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 6. 19864 July 2, 1986 July 25, 1986 4 October, 3 19852 May 6, 1986~ February 17, 1982 - April 18, 19862 May 7, 19854 April 18, 1985 August 23, 19842 May 7, 19864 Aug. 18, 1941 GOODFOOD CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS (See Section 33 of Text) Bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL (See Section 34 of Text) Slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 Bridge. HOUSTON SCHOOL ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Bridge protection using riprap extending 62 feet downstream of centerline of bridge and extending upstream for 99 feet. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 36 of Text) Channel snagging, overbank clearing within the flood plains; riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers, and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work also includes installation of a flood warning system. MARTIN CREEK, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS (See Section 37 of Text) Emergency streambank protection to the banks and bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Altitude Road Bridge crossing Martin Creek. MURDER CREEK, EAST BREWTON, AL (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for nonstructural measures for the reduction of flood damages by flood plain evacuation and flood proofing of selected buildings along the left bank of Murder Creek. MURDER AND BURNT CORN CREEKS, BREWTON, AL (See Section 39 of Text) Non-structural project providing for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. NOXUBEE RIVER RELIEF BRIDGE, SHUQUALAK, MS (See Section 40 of Text) The proposed project for streambank protection at Noxubee River relief bridge would consist of grading and protecting of banks with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. SEWERLINE PROTECTION, VALLEY, AL (See Section 41 of Text) The project provides for the restoration of approximately 1600 linear feet of streambank. This will consist of placing 1550 cubic yards of riprap on 4445 square yards of filter fabric. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA (See Section 42 of Text) The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia, by clearing and snagging and evacuation of 13 structures. TALLABINELLA CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS (See Section 43 of Text) Bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 44 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. DPR (Sec. 14) Urgent Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1986 Public Law 99-349. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) Special Report on Record in OCE. (Public Law 222,) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 10-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 23, 1958 July 8, 1980 August 9, 1985 4 December 6, 19834 July 19, 19844 August 9, 19854 Mar. 2, 1945 June 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 45 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. U.S. HIGHWAY 11 BRIDGE, FOSTERS, AL (See Section 46 of Text) The project provides for stabilization of the banks by placing riprap along a 240-foot reach of the left descending bank at the bridge. WOLF CREEK, U.S. HIGHWAY 45 BRIDGE, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS (See Section 47 of Text) The project provides for stabilization of the banks under each of the bridges. The banks would be graded and protected with 24-inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. OLD HIGHWAY 82 BRIDGES, COLUMBUS, MS (See Section 48 of Text) The project provides restoration and stabilization along the right descending bank of the bridge. The stabilization would consist of 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and a filter fabric. The riprap placement would begin approximately 140 feet downstream of the centerline of the bridge and extend upstream along the right descending bank for 330 feet. INTERSTATE 59 BRIDGES, FOSTERS, AL (See Section 49 of Text) The project provides streambank protective measures at the bridges. Bank stabilization would consist of placing riprap along a 195-foot reach of the left descending bank at the bridge. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL. AND GA. (See Section 53 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 54 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL., GA. AND FL. (See Section 55 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. PL (96-304) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., Ist Sess. 10-40 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized recreation facilities. Jan. 27, 1981' Modified the existing project to provide for DPR (Sec. 107) nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 55A of Text) July 24, 1944 Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. (See Section 55B of Text) July 24, 1946 Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., and low dam at George W. Andrews site. 1st Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FL. (See Section 55C of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. SPEWRELL BLUFF LAKE, GA. (See Section 55D of Text) Dec. 30, 1965 Authorized construction. H. Doc. 567, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL., AND GA. (See Section 55E of Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on site and low dam at Columbia site. Public Works WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND AL. (See Section 55F of Text) October 23, 1963 Authorized construction for flood control, power H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946. 10-41 TABLE 10-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $266,368 Bluff Creek, MS I 1963 1,000 6,883 Bon Secour River, AL2 1979 118,615 197,569 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000- Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 705,118 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 379,413 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,102,094 Gulfport Harbor, MS 1985 635,758 29,189,492 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 82,693 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000- Old Town Creek, MS I 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656- Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 92,352 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 139,653 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,865,5753 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 84,115 Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972 Upper Chipola River, FL, from Marianna to its mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 96-157, 1st Session. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 3. Includes $80,000 contributed funds. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 24 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000- 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-42 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 51 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Alabama River at Montgomery, AL' 1965 $144,194- Armuchee Creek, GA 1966 115,547- Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA 1958 149,815- Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 1985 132,174- Black Creek, Gadsden, AL 1953 125,389- Burketts Creek, Amory, MS 1984 1,366,454- Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL 1985 121,718- Clanton, AL 1964 274,024- Collinsville, AL 1940 71,119- Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 1985 802,026- Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 1982 238,219- Jackson and East Jackson, MS 1979 7,190,200- Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA 1970 164,998- Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 1965 113,849- Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 1980 190,974- Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 250,000- Pearl River, Interstate 20 Bridges, Jackson, MS 1985 250,000- Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL 1946 649,280- Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA 1985 85,029- Rome, Coosa River, GA 1955 384,550- Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 1956 142,637- Sun Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS 1984 55,569- Town Creek, Americus, GA 1965 340,409- Trim Cane Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS 1984 145,519- Trussville, AL 1965 141,334- West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA 1955 599,637- Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 114,753- Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1966 330,734- I. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no con- 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local struction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre- interests. authorization studies. TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document' Deauthorized Bayou Galere, MS Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 5 Aug. 1977 1st Sess., as amended. I. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-E. 10-43 REPORT TO THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 21 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1986 Costs Bayou Cumbest, Jackson County, MS 107 $2,203 Carrabelle Harbor, FL 107 10 East Point, FL 107 458 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 21,018 Shell Point, Wakulla County, FL 107 946 Tombigbee River, Columbus, MS 107 23,417 Total $48,052' 1. Excludes construction costs of $145,490 for Biloxi Harbor, Harrison County Canal, MS and $124,622 for Dog River Channel, AL. TABLE 10-I BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1986 Costs Liza Jackson Park, Ft. Walton, FL 103 $ 518 Santa Rosa Island, FL 103 622 Total $1,140 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 52 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1986 Costs Big Escambia Creek, Flomaton, AL 205 $ 45,939 Brickyard Bayou, Gulfport, MS 205 7,210 Chattahoochee River, Vinings, GA 205 15,068 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL 205 71,963 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL 205 66,674 Five Mile Creek, Brookside, AL 205 27,888 Glencoe, AL 205 7,414 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 205 16,832 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS 205 27,370 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 205 9,342 Mixons Creek, Lamar County, MS 205 40,354 Orange Grove Community, MS 205 5,489 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA 205 44,491 Silver Creek, Rome, GA 205 15,414 Sougahatchee Creek, Auburn, AL 205 64 Three Mile Creek Tributary, Mobile, AL 205 6,900 Tibbee Creek, Reform, AL 205 33,700 Toulmins Spring Branch, Prichard, AL 205 9,701 Trim Cane Creek, MS 205 35,701 Upper Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 205 45,287 Alligator Point, Franklin County, FL 14 210 Cooks Bayou, Bay County, FL 14 3,700 Little Wolf Creek, Booneville Airport, MS 14 5,330 Pascagoula River, Griffin Point, MS 14 7,500 Sucarnoochee River, De Kalb-Wahalak, Kemper County, MS 14 2,990 Sucarnoochee River, Townsend-Porterville, Kemper County, MS 14 1,840 Vernon Branch Bridge, Columbus, MS 14 5,162 Wolf Creek, Booneville Airport Road, MS 14 4,890 Elliotts Creek, Moundville, AL 208 7,320 Haven Creek, Lee County, MS 208 6,100 Total $577,843 10-44 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 22 of Text) Project Apalachicola Bay, FL Bayou La Batre, MS Biloxi Harbor, MS Blackwater River, FL Bon Secour, AL Cadet Bayou, MS Carrabelle Harbor, FL Dauphin Island Bay, AL Escambia Bay, FL Fly Creek, AL Fowl River, AL La Grange Bayou, FL Panacea, FL Panama City, FL Pascagoula River, MS Pass Christian, MS Pensacola Harbor, FL Port St. Joe Harbor, FL St. Marks River, FL Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS Date of Survey July, 1986 July, 1986 September, 1986 November, 1985 September, 1986 January, 1986 July, 1986 August, 1986 November, 1985 September, 1986 September, 1986 August, 1986 July, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 February, 1986 July, 1986 August, 1986 July, 1986 February, 1986 Total TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 53 and 54 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.1' 42.2' 245.41 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 Varies seasonally Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 -- (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,122,507 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,084 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 10-45 TABLE 10-K Cost During Fiscal Year 8,466 18,210 1,204 9,030 17,055 6,870 12,911 9,772 3,119 3,954 859 9,961 13,906 3,249 1,258 15,317 151 1,901 4,328 5,160 $146,681 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 55 of Text) Existing Projects Authorized Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Lower Woodruff Andrews George Lake Auchumpkee Lazer Spewrell Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney Creek Creek Bluff and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Lake Lake Lake Miles above mouth 107.6' 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 233.43 255.83 263.83 Nearest town Chattahoochee, Columbia, Al. Ft. Gaines, West Point, Buford, Ga. Roberta, Ga. Thomaston, Manchester, Fl. Ga. Ga. Ga. Ga. Ga. Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 7 8 8 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - -- - available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - -- - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - -. Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1070 417 543 700 surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Gated Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 67 62 114 95 192 130 142 180 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth Concrete Concrete Concrete and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18, 180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 548,000 342,000 486,200 (acre-feet) Power development 30,000 -1 30,000 73,875 86,000 81,000 87,000 150,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100-- Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - Estimated cost: - - - - - $222,000,000 $258,000,000 $360,000,000 Cost to date: 4 $47,978,749 $13,038,427 $98,543,5435 $131,501,360 $53,035,378 - - $2,158,652 1. Above the mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Above mouth of Flint River (river miles). 4. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 5. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge. 10-46 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 7 of Text) Armistead I. William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam' Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3)within city) 6 15 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600.0 600.0 600.0 450.0 600.0 600.0 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam $21,597,2643 $19,774,5833 $13,295,5533 $4,450,874 $28,100,0003 $47,258,6514 1. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Al. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Cost to date (FY 86) for replacement of single lift lock which was essentially completed in FY 80. Excludes $1,435,636 cost of land submerged, damage to structures, and cost of spillway. Also excludes $3,824,859 cost of original double lift lock. 10-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 19 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay Springs Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Lock and and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway and Dam Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, AL Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tupelo, MS Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 1 10 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 I10 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Summer)414 pool surface (msl) (Winter)409 Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sandstone Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Shale. Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/ A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Summer)180,000 (acre-feet)(Winter)143,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147,000,000 Cost to date $99,961,000 137,802,000 172,715,000 I 10,437,000 91,199,000 89,790,000 62,026,000 89,468,000 75,813,000 130,398,000 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90) 0 00h MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1980 THRU FY 1986' (See Section 58 of Text) Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Montgomery Co., Alabama Roanoke, Alabama Wedowee, Alabama Heflin, Alabama Randolph County, Alabama Hobson City, Alabama Oxford, Alabama Weaver, Alabama Flood Insurance Studies Anniston, Alabama Calhoun County, Alabama Cave Springs, Georgia Columbus, Mississippi Lowndes County, Mississippi Aberdeen, Mississippi Amory, Mississippi Cherokee County, Georgia Monroe County, Mississippi Floyd County, Georgia Special Flood Hazard Information Dowling Branch, Ala. Choctawhatchee River, Vicinity of Daleville, AL Gum Creek, Ga. Choctawhatchee River, Fla. Chattahoochee River, Supplefor Buford to Whitesburg Report Oothcalooga Creek Canton Creek, Ga. Oktasasi Creek, Ala. Cordele Creek & Malcolm Branch, Ga. Hull Branch, MS Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) (Prepared for Federal Insurance Administration, HUD) FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA FEMA City of Hartford, Ala. City of Daleville, AL Housing Authority, Cordele, Ga. Board of County Commissioners Holmes County, Fla. Atlanta Reg. Planning Commission Gordon Co., GA Board of Commissioners City of Canton, Ga. Alexander City, Ala. City of Cordele, Ga. East Central Planning and Development District City of Albany, GA City of Ellijay, GA I. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 reports. 10-49 Apr 80 Feb 81 Feb 81 Mar 81 Mar 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Apr 82 Apr 82 Jan 84 Feb 85 Feb 85 May 85 May 85 July 85 Oct 85 Dec 85 Jan 80 Apr 80 Sep 80 Jan 81 Mar 82 Jun 82 Dec 82 Jan 83 May 83 Jun 84 Nov 84 Jul 86 104,600 19,400 21,900 20,700 34,400 14,200 30,000 6,400 80,900 61,200 22,500 36,000 229,000 35,000 50,000 168,000 140,000 330,000 10,000 15,00 10,000 10,000 5,000 10,000 3,000 3,000 4,000 7,000 14,000 22,000 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, including drainage area of Red River south of Fulton, AR, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes, drainage area of Ouchita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of Lock) (Formerly Vermilion Lock, LA ......... 2. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA .................. 3. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ...... 4. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA ........................... 5. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA ............. 6. Navigation work under special authorization ................. Flood Control 7. Grand Isle & vicinity, LA ............. 8. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ............. 9. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ................. Page Flood Control (cont.) 10. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (hurricane protection) ............... 11-2 11. New Orleans to Venice, LA, (hurricane protection) ................ 11-2 12. Inspection of completed flood 11-3 control projects ...................... 13. Flood control work under special 11-4 authorization ....................... 11-5 11-5 11-5 11-6 General Investigations 14. Active Investigations ................. Tables Table 11-A Table 11-B Table 11-C Table 11-D 11-7 Table 11-E Cost and Financial Statement.. Authorizing Legislation ....... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. Active General Investigations.. Page 11-7 11-8 11-9 11-9 11-9 11-10 11-12 11-14 11-16 11-18 11-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK, LA) Location. In the Louisiana section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Abbeville, Vermilion Parish, LA, about 163 miles west of Harvey Lock. Existing project. The present Leland Bowman Lock, located in the most heavily utilized section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is the controlling structure in both width and depth. The lock is used for navigation and flood control (prevention of salt water intrusion). The tumbler-type gates are unsatisfactory for the dual purpose. (Flood Control-Navigation) operation required, since once the gates are lowered to pass flood flows, they cannot be safely raised until the differential stage across the lock is reduced to about 0.5 foot. The replacement lock also will provide a larger and more efficient outlet for floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $32,200,000 Federal and $240,000 non-Federal. The project was renamed "Leland Bowman Lock (Replacement)" by House Resolution 4284 dated Sep. 21, 1981 (House Report 97-234.) Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance works. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury furnished assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including PL 91-611 and PL 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. Amended assurances of local cooperation were accepted on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of the Army on Jul. 5, 1977. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury on May 26, 1981 granted right of entry for construction of project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated Oct. 15, 1981, and completed Mar. 9, 1985 at a cost of $26,781,241. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 100 percent complete. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.1 miles below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, AL, and 349 miles east of Galveston, TX. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carre, Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1980 (48th edition) folio of flood control and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA, published by the MRC.) Previous projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge 129.3 miles to upper port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet mean low water; within limits of port of New Orleans, where that authority has jurisdiction over both banks of river, a distance of 17.8 miles, 35 by 1,500 feet, measured from a line generally 100 feet from face of left bank wharves, but not closer than 100 feet to wharves on right bank; within 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet; from lower limits of port of New Orleans 86.7 miles to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 17.5 miles from Head of Passes to jetty channel, 40 by 800 feet; 4.1 miles in the Southwest Pass bar and jetty channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass from Head of Passes to outer ends of jetties, 13.5 miles, 30 by 450 feet; and 1.2 miles in the South Pass bar channel, 30 by 600 feet. Plane of reference below New Orleans is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above and through New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Spur dikes are constructed of round timber piles and/ or triangular prestressed concrete piles, with riprap at the landward ends to connect the dikes to the bank line. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12, 070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes in about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1986) is $386,900,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,222,800. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, LA" revised 1977.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, LA," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, and Lake Charles, LA," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. The Supplement II to the GDM was completed in March 1986 and the environmental impact statement (EIS) for this supplement was completed in May 1986. Maintenance: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: Two dustpan dredges removed 10,754,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $3,332,700. (b) New Orleans Harbor: One leased dredge contract removed 2,393,100 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,519,000. (c) Cubit's Gap (mile 3 AHP) through Southwest Pass: Two hopper dredges and two cutterhead dredges removed 17,930,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $12,890,000. (d) Southwest Pass: Work was completed on two pile dike repair contracts at a total cost of $3,232,000. Hired labor repairs to pile dikes at a total cost of $508,300. In addition, a contract for repairs to the east and west jetties was completed at a total cost of $1,886,300. (e) Wheeler Wharf at Venice: Modification and repairs to the wharf were performed by hired labor units at a cost of $254,700. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 50 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. The foreshore dike Mile 0.5 to Mile 3.0 AHP on the right descending bank is complete. The foreshore dike Mile 0.6 to Mile 4.6 BHP on the left descending bank is complete. The foreshore dike Mile 2.3 to Mile 4.7 BHP right descending bank is 85 percent complete. The foreshore dike Mile 4.0 to Mile 3.0 AHP right descending bank is 75 percent complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1980 (48th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) 11-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1985) is $489,000,000 Federal and $225,300,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Original assurances furnished and accepted. Local agency has furnished Supplemental Assurance covering Public Law 91-646. Rights-ofentry for entire project were furnished by local agency which is in process of conveying to the United States title to remaining tracts. Supplemental assurances reflecting the changes made necessary by enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 were requested on Jan. 12, 1977. The Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, by letter dated Sep. 18, 1978, stated that they are unable to provide the required supplemental assurances at this time. They are concerned about the possible effects of the proposed new Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock on this project and pending legislation concerning local assurances for the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal project. Local interests have provided right of entry for construction for the Baptiste Collette Bayou portion of this project. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at mile 63. Two newcontainer ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering environmental and economic studies were completed for the new lock and connecting channels feature. One contract for foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, station 367 to 1007 was completed October 1986. Maintenance dredging under four contracts in the Gulf Entrance Channel, Breton Sound and Michoud Canal include the removal of 8,013,786 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,860,009. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958 and entire project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project, construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes, is in a deferred status and construction of foreshore protection is scheduled to be initiated in June 1985. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in an Evaluation Report scheduled for completion in FY 1990. The foreshore protection is 98 percent complete. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA Location. In the coastal marsh area and in the vicinity of the Mississippi River at about miles 10 to 11 above the Head of Passes. (Refer to NOAA Coast Chart No. 1361.) Existing project. Provides for additional navigation outlets in the vicinity of Venice, LA, by enlargement of the existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with entrance channels in open water 16 by 250 feet and jetties to the 6-foot-depth contour, if and when justified, to reduce cost of maintenance dredging. Existing project was completed at a cost of $10,008,400. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-17, Annual Report, FY 1980. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Basic assurances for the project have been furnished. Amended assurances covering Public Laws 91-646 and 91-611 were received on Aug. 5, 1977. Terminal facilities. In the Venice area, each operator of a construction, repair, or supply facility provides dock and transfer facilities to meet his own needs or arranges to use those of another. These facilities are considered adequate for the anticipated traffic. If new industry or supply facilities are established, they would provide any needed terminal facilities for their use. Ample areas for future expansion are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor work consisted of reconnaisance surveys, condition and operation, stream gaging and engineering 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT studies. One contract for maintenance dredging at Baptiste Collette Bar Channel, was completed August 1986, included the removal of 1,377,189 cubic yards at a cost of $576,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 100 percent complete. 5. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou,,which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart, No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for enlargement and subsequent maintenance of Bayou LeCarpe and of aids to navigation, and provide alterations to facilities, and hold the United States free from -damage. Assurances were furnished and accepted. Local agency made available spoil areas for maintenance dredging of Bayou LeCarpe. None of these areas will be transferred to the United States. Meeting are continuing with local interests to resolve problems with their required cash contribution on total project cost. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor consisted of real estate activities, reconnaissance surveys, and water quality studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of October 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1986, were $512,467 for Bayou Grand Caillou. Flood Control 7. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of southwest pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet mean sea level, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet mean sea level at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet mean sea level and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 2,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1986) is $13,445,000 Federal and $7,848,000 non-Federal, including $3,438,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Local interests have the responsibility of providing rights-of-way, 30 percent of hurricane protection costs, 75 percent of beach erosion costs, and operation and maintenance of the completed work. The Louisiana Legislature, by Act 833 of 1982, authorized the Office of Public Works of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to provide the non-Federal assurances for the Grand Isle Hurricane Protection and Beach erosion project. On Jan. 11, 1983, the Louisiana State Government authorized the Office of Public Works to execute the required assurances as a co-sponsor with the Town of Grand Isle. The required assurances were executed on Mar. 16, 1983, the construction rights-of-way were provided on May 4, 1983, and local interest provided a cash contribution of $2,100,000 on Jun. 1, 1983. Maintenance of the project is the responsibility of the local assurer. The local assurer will receive Federal aid for repairing erosion and other damage to the project for a period of 15 years. The average annual Federal maintenance cost identified in the Act of Assurances is $44,000; however, this is not a fixed amount. Periodic nourishment to repair erosion will not necessarily be conducted every year, but as needed, with an 11-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 estimated frequency of one in eight years on the average. It is estimated that the Federal share of the maintenance cost will be 25 percent for the 15-year period. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications were initiated to repair damages caused by winter storms and three hurricanes. The contract is scheduled for award in FY 87. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 80 percent complete. 8. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricanegenerated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan will provide for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of US Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1986) is $477,000,000 Federal and $205,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. The State of Louisiana formed the Jefferson Levee District and assigned to it the Jefferson Parish levees, previously the responsibility of the Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette area plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the barrier plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette area plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury have executed the supplemental assurance. The St. Tammany Parish portion of the project has been placed in an inactive status since the local sponsors have not provided acceptable assurances. Supplemental Assurances in connection with the High Level Plan were executed by the Orleans Levee District on May 29, 1985, and approved by the United States June 21, 1985. Supplemental Assurances have been forwarded to the Pontchartrain and Jefferson Levee Districts for execution for St. Charles and Jefferson Parishes respectively. The Louisiana Office of Public Works will coordinate the execution of these Supplemental Assurances with Pontchartrain and Jefferson Levee Districts. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan are not required from St. Bernard Parish Police Jury and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District for St. Bernard Parish. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. Preparation of seven design memorandums are underway. Four are scheduled for completion in FY 87 and three in FY 88. A Draft Reevaluation Report (including Draft Environmental Impact Statement) recommending the tentatively selected high level plan (lieu of Barrier Plan) was submitted by New Orleans District to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division in December 1983. The final Reevaluation Report was submitted to 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT LMVD on Aug. 8, 1984. A Record of Decision was signed in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 68 percent complete. Contract work continued on nine contracts. Construction was initiated on three more contracts: Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to London Ave., Paris Road to South Point Levee; and Station 278 and 355. 9. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lke Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Pointa- la-Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116 Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. Estimated cost for new work (October 1986) is $64,000,000 Federal and $27,400,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $13,822,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $27,400,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,578,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973 and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Local interests have requested and received funds from the State of Louisiana for right-of-way acquisition and relocations required to support construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work continued on design memorandums and plans and specifications by hired labor forces. Two contracts were awarded; Secton E-South (first lift) was completed April 1986, and the Larose Floodwall is 82 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 52 percent complete. 10. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In south-central Louisiana, Morgan City proper, and the adjacent areas. It includes the land south of Grand Lake, Six Mile Lake, and Lake Palourde extending from Morgan City westward to Charenton drainage and navigation canal. Lower Atchafalaya River and Wax Lake Outlet, the principal outlets for Atchafalaya Basin Floodway, traverse the area. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses the area in an east-west direction. Numerous bayous and artificial canals excavated for drainage purposes or for access to oil developments exist throughout the area. (See Engineer quadrangles Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, Foster, Belle Isle, Point Au Fer, Morgan City, and Lake Decade; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116.) Existing project. Morgan City: Construction of about 5.6 miles of new levees along shore of Lake Palourde and west bank of Bayou Ramos and about 0.5 mile of new levee from Southern Pacific railroad embankment near Wyandotte to tie in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee, and construction of three gravity drainage structures. Franklin and vicinity: Enlargement of about 21.6 miles of back levee and construction of about 3.5 miles of new levees to effect a complete closure of area to be protected, construction of one floodgate and eight gravity drainage structures, and alteration of existing drainage facilities where necessary. Normal range of tide is 1.6 feet. Storm and hurricane tide have produced elevations up to 10 feet while northerly storms during winter depress the gulf level as much as 3 feet below mean sea level. During low water periods on Atchafalaya River, generally September through November, the effect of tide extends about 35 miles 11-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 above Morgan City. Estimated cost for total project (October 1986) is $27,700,000 Federal and $14,950,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interest must furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, provide relocations and alterations required for project; provide all interior drainage and pumping plants required for reclamation and development of protected areas; maintain and operate all project works after completion including levees, drainage structures, floodgates and drainage ditches or canals, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide assurances that encroachment on existing ponding areas will be prevented unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly, without cost to the United States; contribute in cash or equivalent work not less than 30 percent of project cost, the final determination to be made after construction is complete; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works. Assuring Agency: The act of assurance and supporting resolution from the St. Mary Parish Police Jury were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Jul. 18, 1968. Supplemental assurances were furnished by the St. Mary Parish Police Jury for the Morgan City Area separable feature of the project. These supplemental assurances include the additional items of local cooperation required by PL 91-611 and PL 91-646 and were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jul. 23, 1980. The Franklin Area feature was specifically excluded in the supplemental assurances. Operations and results during period. The GDM for the Morgan City area was completed in FY 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not commenced. 11. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Misisissippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and construction of a barrier levee on the east bank of the Mississippi River from Bohemia to mile 10 AHP with enlargement of the west bank Mississippi River levee from Fort Jackson to Venice, generally called the East Bank Barrier Levee plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B- 2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1988) is $167,000,000 Federal and $72,000,000 non-Federal, including $59,175,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $4,888,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $7,437,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $70,000,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $57,550,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal floodingand that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91- 646), in acquiring real property. PL 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. PL 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-i, B-2 and C, requested on Jan. 7, 1963, were furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on Mar. 6, 1964. Required supporting papers were furnished on Mar. 16, 1965 and accepted. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of PL 91-646 were received from Plaquemines Parish Commission Council on May 23, 1973 and accepted on Jun. 20, 1973. Assurances for the entire project have been furnished and accepted, although they do not specifically mention the East Bank Barrier Levee 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Plan. The scope of the project has not changed; however, local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee. By letter dated Feb. 5, 1985, the local sponsor requested the Corps of Engineers to defer work on the design of Reach A and direct efforts toward earliest possible construction of a barrier levee or a suitable alternative thereto. The local sponsor expressed a willingness to provide supplemental assurances for the Barrier Levee. There was a delay of approximately 26 months in the furnishing of assurances by local interests primarily because they desired that agreement on levee alignment be consummated as fully as possible before giving their assurance. Problems of assurance of local cooperation have been resolved and rights-of-way were furnished for the first two Reach B-1 items of work on Aug. 23, 1968 and May 20, 1970, respectively. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Assurances for all reaches of the project, except the East Bank Barrier levee, have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work continued on the GDM for the East Bank Barrier Levee and is approximately 75 percent complete. Plans and specifications for segments of Reaches B-1, B-2 and C were initiated and are continuing. Construction during FY 86 included Reach B-1 Levee, Sta. 373+00 to Sta. 635+00, completed in April 1986; Reach B-2, Sta. 1+00 to 279+00 and Sta. 287+00 to Sta. 481+51, awarded Sep. 24, 1986; and Reach C, Sta. 552+00 to Sta. 834+39, third lift, initiated Aug. 1986. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 32 percent complete. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1986. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $247,200. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1986, were $1,959,827. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $140,520. Emergency Operations: Total costs to Sep. 30, 1986 were $737,379. General Investigations 14. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 11-J which covers: Surveys, Collections and study of basic data, and Research and Development activities. 11-9 TABLE 11-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 1. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of lock) 2. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA 3. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA 5. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, LA) 7. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) 8. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 14,000,000 12,697,628 900,000 1,545,117 10,325,000 8,341,621 2,578,556 447,155 800,000 4,000,000 13,251,000 878,037 1,192,445 16,022,664 45,611,260 48,510,600 39,039,920 24,957,067 43,786,783 47,713,135 41,229,463 25,630,318 2,005,000 1,027,035 11,048,000 14,717,186 500,000 1,664,718 9,705,000 10,169,620 2,200,000 1,286,205 4,429,000 4,515,392 121,500 77,500 6,933,000 7,684,892 6,663,500 6,808,104 -2,900 - - - 340 - - 0 2,196,000 1,423,000 2,832,000 1,240,276 2,227,642 1,394,421 2,881,422 1,239,090 75,000 111,102 40,000 43,223 3,000,000 4,161,000 226,231 6,714,791 - 2,110,000 - 2,000,000 228,000 177,151 -21,000 -21,000 432,000 653,469 100,000 100,000 56,395 31,470 30,669 1,000,000 735,330 70,000 70,000 13,716,000 8,800,000 11,158,000 20,358,000 13,510,392 7,937,422 10,382,763 21,676,920 313,124 356,602 325,000 260,000 195,000 260,000 510,988 1,102,053 9,870,000 5,700,000 5,865,000 4,221,000 7,734,710 6,901,800 7,441,971 4,073,880 6,139 384,000 541,000 387,000 367,606 182,000 182,000 280,000 221,260 -79,000 21,762 $ 32,200,0101 31,896,976' 58,162,7972 58,624,5522 468,003,9113,5 467,632,3824,5 88,273,200 88,066,982 102,314,080 102,238,928 1,240,4776 1,196,4776 10,008,093 10,008,100 9,891,076 9,871,063 637,622 641,076 899,232 898,431 9,342,500 9,005,680 2,280,000 2,170,000 181,596,000 180,077,548 4,321,172 4,953,729 42,188,000 40,754,605 2,271,721 2,243,268 1,953,000 1,975,628 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1985 11. Mississippi New Work River Delta at Approp. 3,450,000 2,830,000 1,920,000 971,000 54,360,000 and below New Cost 2,515,286 3,581,564 1,630,947 1,449,660 54,320,117 Orleans, LA (New Orleans to Venice, LA, Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 3,050,000 - - 1,368,989 4,785,419 Cost 2,600,000 450,000 - 984,106 4,400,536 1. Includes AE&D funds for replacement of Vermilion Lock. 2. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 3. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 4. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 5. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 6. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRD Act of 1976, dated Oct. 22, 1976 (PL 94-587) Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK) (See Sec. 1 of Text) A replacement lock, 110 feet wide and 1,200 feet long, to accommodate present and projected marine traffic. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LA (See Sec. 4 of Text) Enlargement of existing channels of Baptiste Collette Bayou and Grand-Tiger Passes to 14 by 150 feet with 16 by 250-foot entrance channels in open water and jetties, if justified. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) (See Sec. 5 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16,3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See. Sec. 8 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. Approved by Secretary of the Army, May 1967, under authority of the R&H Act of 1909. H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 9 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 sess. 1 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 10 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three sess. gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 11 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing sess. heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-13 TABLE 11-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1986 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Barataria Bay Water, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA 3,4,5,6 Bayou Dupre, LA7 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA8 Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA4 9 Bayou Vermilion, LA 4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA 3 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA 1o Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA 11 Cane River, LA'3,6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA 12 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA1" 3 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA 14 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA'5 Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Mermentau River, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 19462 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 19422 1950 1973 1977 1985 28,234 11,768,376 30,353,236 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 1969 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,807,310 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 69,087 39,822,427 17,946,706 320,758 104,1877 123,454 119,191 829,756 223,616 36,780 28,315 213,455 4,440,688 1,668,036 251,691 200,169 37,169 98,196,595 2,000 463,401 452,611 15,491,840 14,48012 63,284,470 179,937,233 - 18,827,749 249,052 77,761 5,197,97516 4,672,579 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 17,436,233 11-14 1928 1914 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 May 1981 1938 May 1956 1915 March 1923 March 1957 1916 1896 3 Oct. 1968 April 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 Nov. 1979 1929 Jul. 1952 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1986 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 - Nov. 1974 Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)17 - 1957 - 139,755- Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 13,545 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Inactive 1981 - 1,450,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 - 22,870,845 Sulphur River, AR and TX 3,6 - 1919 45,989 -- Tangipahoa River, LA - 1985 - 618,501- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA4 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Vinton Waterway, LA21 Deauthorized 1950 - - Nov. 1979 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA 13 - 1948 10,904 0,742 Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 849,238 Jun. 1950 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 2. Date authorized. 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 4. Includes previous project costs. 5. No commerce reported. 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. 15. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. 17. Work is under continuing authority. 11-15 TABLE 11-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1986 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA 1 Amite River and Tributaries, LA Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA 1,12 Bayou Choupique, LA3 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA3 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA",2,12 Bayou Rapides, LA3 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA 1,4 ,5 ,12 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LA 3 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA 1,7 ,12 Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA1,7 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX8 East Point, LA Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake 0' the Pines, TX8.9 Garland City, AR' 2 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA1, 9 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR.1.9,12 Maniece Bayou, AR.",2 ,u McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR."' 2 Natchitoches Parish, LA' ,2 Pineville, Red River, LA" 3" 2 Posten Bayou, AR."' 2 Red River Parish, LA",9,12 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA',12 Saline Point, LA",9 Aug. 1977 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 196310 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 $ 1,653,189 3,034,2552 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,3362 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 70,348 20,839,300 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 1,018,005 88,006 970,9322 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 11-16 Apr. 1955 Feb. 1964 Jan. 1948 Mar. 1954 Jun. 1964 Jun. 1939 Dec. 1951 May 1963 Jul. 1978 Apr. 1976 8,301,021 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 9 9 Aug. 1969 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Mar. 1953 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-D (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1986 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Twelvemile Bayou, LA3 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX8 1966 1979 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries .............. $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ....................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ...... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA .......................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR ..................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................. 250,000 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended.) 4. Construction not initiated. 5. Inactive. 335,433 35,659,176 11,195,021 May 1965 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, Southwestern Division, during FY 1979. 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 10. Date authorized. 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12. These projects transferred to the Vicksburg District during FY 1983. 11-17 TABLE 11-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 86 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA -1009 GIWW LA & TX Section -10032 Flood Control Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA -12123 Amite River & Tributaries, LA -50100 Lake Pontchartrain-West Shore, LA -79700 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation -12348 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Shore & Barrier Island Erosion -12354 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Water Supply -12355 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA -34014 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA -59360 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Deauthorization Review -77000 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 Planning Assistance to States (186) -14822 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services TOTAL (Category 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category 400) Lake Pontchartrain-North Shore, LA -12349 Mississippi River-Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA (55270) TOTAL (Category 400) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 11-18 $ 51,997 $ 423,903 475,900 6,105 294,730 1,230 161,614 239,516 179,986 133,271 241,513 1,257,965 13,081 22,910 232 28,226 28,457 $1,798,313 186,664 9 763,622 763,631 $2,748,608 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi- Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, Arkansas; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas- Arkansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ......................... 2. Red River emergency bank protection ........................... 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA .............. 4. Yazoo River, MS ...................... 5. Navigation work under special authorization ......................... Flood Control 6. Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA .............. 7. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA .......................... 8. Caddo Lake, LA ...................... 9. Lead Bayou, MS ...................... 10. Ouachita River Levees, LA ............ 11. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA .......................... 12. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ......... 13. Porter Bayou, MS .................... 14. Poverty Point State Commemorative A rea, LA ............................ 15. Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) ..................... 16. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) .................. Page Flood Control (cont) 17. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, 12-2 LA, to Index, AR .................... 18. Inspection of completed Flood 12-2 Control Projects ..................... 19. Flood control work under 12-2 special authorization ................ 12-3 12-3 Tables Table 12-A Table 12-B Table 12-C 12-4 12-4 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-6 12-6 12-6 Table 12-D Table 12-E Table 12-F Table 12-G Table 12-H 12-7 Table 12-I 12-7 Table 12-J Cost and Financial Statement.. Authorizing Legislation ....... Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams .............. Other Authorized Navigation Project ...................... Ouachita River and Tributaries Existing Project .............. Reservoir Operations Fiscal Year 1984 .............. Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ................ Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects ......... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. Active General Investigations .. Page 12-7 12-7 12-8 12-9 12-11 12-13 12-14 12-16 12-16 12-17 12-18 12-19 12-21 12-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $7,064,031.68, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. This is being accomplished by construction of four new locks, 84 feet by 600 feet; new dams; channel realinement to accommodate the 9-foot draft tow; and measures to preserve Catahoula Lake for migratory waterfowl. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized establishment of wildlife refuges along Bayou D'Arbonne (14,700 acres) in connection with Columbia Lock and Dam and at Felsenthal Lock and Dam (65,000 acres). The Bayou D'Arbonne refuge was increased to 18,000 acres at the request of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Estimated cost for new work for 9-foot navigation project is $279,153,000 including $269,000,000 Federal and $10,153,000 non- Federal for lands, damages, and relocations. Local cooperation. Local cooperation for all completed work in Louisiana has been furnished in a timely manner. It is anticipated that local interests in Louisiana will be able to supply the necessary rightsof- way for construction of the cutoffs and bend widenings. Local interests in Arkansas have furnished the rights-of-way for the Felsenthal and Calion Locks and Dams and it is anticipated that the remaining rights-of-way will be furnished when needed. The city of Camden, AR, has furnished land for the Sandy Beach recreation area. All assurances from local interests including supplemental assurances (Public Law 91-646) have been accepted. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of all the locks and dams in the project are now complete. Calion Access Channel Part II Construction Contract was initiated in FY 86. This contract was required due to changed site conditions discovered under the original contract which was discontinued in FY 85. The demolition contracts for the removal of Lock #6 and Lock #8 were completed in FY 86. Initiated construction of six recreation facilities in the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge (Felsenthal L & D access point, Calion L & D, No. 8, Eagle Lake Access Point, Grand Marias Phase I, Pereogethee Access Road, and Crossett Harbor Phase I). Initiated construction of the beautification and land-scaping at Felsenthal Lock and Dam. Initiated construction of the wastewater disposal system at Calion Lock & Dam. Maintenance dredging removed 764,449 cubic yards of material from the Ouachita- Black Waterway during FY 86. Condition as of Sep. 30. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Columbia and Jonesville Pools were opened to nine foot navigation in June 1972. The Felsenthal Lock and Dam is open to navigation. The Calion lock is scheduled to be open for nine foot navigation in late FY 87. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, TX. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1986) is $65,300 Federal and $2,182,000 non- Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Construction of the Goose Lake realignment, river mile 407-L, was completed. Construction contracts for Little River Phase III revetment, river mile 405-L, and Oak Revetment Extension, river mile 347-R, are continuing. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 95% complete. 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,564,000,000 Federal and $88,219,000 non-federal, including $43,071,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost excludes $294,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the proposed Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are essentially complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued work on Design Memoranda, preparation of Plans and Specifications, Surveys, General Engineering, and Model Studies. Construction of the John H. Overton Lock and Dam reached 80 percent completion in November 1987. A construction contract for preparatory sitework at Lock and Dam #3 was completed, and a second contract consisting of bank stabilization and a portion of the cofferdam was awarded and is continuing. One bank stabilization item was awarded in Pool 3. Construction of channel realignment and bank stabilization works in Pools 1 & 2 consisted of the following: Six items were completed - Once More realignment, Pointfield realignment, Raven Camp realignment, Moncla/Dupre revetment, Lock & Dam #1 dikes, and Lock & Dam #1 Dike 5. Items initiated were: Joffrion revetment, England realignment, Boyce revetment, Bayou Cocodrie dikes, Delhoste dikes, Hadden-Ft. Derussy Capout, and Larto ACS. Items continuing include: Meade realignment, Lorran Lake realignment, Philip Bayou realignment, and Grand Bend realignment. During FY 86, the contract dredge Butcher removed 897,000 cubic yards of material on the waterway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 40 percent complete. 4. YAZOO RIVER, MS Location. Formed by junction of Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers in Leflore County, MS, flows about 169 miles southerly and southwesterly, and enters Mississippi River at Vicksburg, MS. (See Mississippi River alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Previous projects. See page 681 of Annual Report for 1961 for details. Authorized project. The Yazoo River Navigation project consists of a 9-foot channel from its mouth to Greenwood, MS, mile 164.9 (present mileage), with a minimum width of 150 feet. The project includes a single lock (84 feet by 600 feet) and a dam located near Vicksburg, dredging and channel realinement; 600,000 acre-feet of additional storage in Sardis Lake to augment low flows in the Yazoo River, and recreation features. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-3 of FY 80 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Greenwood there is a privately owned dock and a grain-loading facility. There are privately owned facilities for loading grain at Belzoni and Satartia. At Yazoo City there is a privately owned grain-loading facility, a private logloading facility, a private dock to handle dry and liquid fertilizer, and a public terminal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Clearing and snagging was completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. A portion of the river is navigable; however, in order for the entire system to be that way, alteration of the Sheppardtown Bridge will be necessary. No funds have been provided for this alteration. No work done on new authorization. Phase I studies are being deferred on the nine foot project due to lack of economic justification. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended (preauthorization). During FY 86 detailed project studies continued on Union County Port, AR, at a cost of $11,820; and on Greenwood Port, MS, at a cost of $79,423. Plans and specifications were continued at Bastrop Port at a cost of $31,784. All three study efforts were terminated near the end of the FY as a result of new policy guidance on small ports. Funds in the amounts of $59 and $604 were expended on two other studies at Yellow Bend and Two Bayou, respectively. Both studies were also terminated as a result of the same policy guidance. 12-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Flood Control 6. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, AR, about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, LA. Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support for such levees by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. Status of studies: A re-evaluation study is underway to determine if there are any feasible alternatives. 7. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. Estimated cost for new work (October 1986) is $25,600,000 Federal and $5,460,000 non- Federal; however, this is subject to change pending outcome of the reevaluation study currently under way. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President Recommended to deauthorize this project. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Additional documents concerning environmental and socioeconomic impacts are currently being prepared and will be available to the public prior to further construction. There is clear evidence of a marked shift in land use within the project area over the past several years, from rural to urban-suburban. Because of this shift, we now find it necessary to expand our studies beyond those initially envisioned. The expanded studies will cover the areas of alternatives and economics, in addition to the natural environment. A scheduled date for resuming construction on the project has not been set. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of the unconstructed portion of the authorized project and additional engineering studies. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. Alternatives to provide flood protection are being considered and these efforts will continue. 8. CADDO LAKE DAM, LA Location. In Caddo Parish, about 19 miles northwest of Shreveport, LA, at the eastern end of Caddo Lake and at head of Twelve Mile Bayou. Existing project. Replacement of the original dam was completed in June 1971, having same flow characteristics and located as near as practicable downstream of the old dam, built under navigation project "Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA." New dam is capable of being raised in the future if desirable and justified. The Federal cost of the project through June 1976, was $3,586,000. The non-federal cost was $228,000. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 transferred the operation and maintenance of the dam from local to federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Public law 94-587, Section 174, amended the Flood Control Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298) to provide that operation and maintenance of Caddo Lake Dam be the responsibility of the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers. Conveyance of title to the United States from the Caddo Levee District is being reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of condition and operation studies, stream gaging, and water quality studies. Maximum pool elevation was 171.9 feet NGVD on June 30, 1986, when storage in the flood control pool was 0 acre-foot. On Sep. 30, 1986, the pool elevation was 168.1 feet NGVD and storage in flood control pool was 0 acre-foot. A feasibility study investigating enlarging the lake for M&I water supply is complete. The report was submitted in Nov 1985 and recommended no federal action. LMVD approved the report and the notice of issuance of summary report was disseminated in January 1986. 9. LEAD BAYOU, MS Location. Lead Bayou is a tributary of the Sunflower River in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS, approximately 30 miles from the Mississippi River near Cleveland, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement was for enlargement of the existing Lead Bayou channel to provide a 1.5-year degree of protection to agricultural areas and a 10-year degree of protection to the small developed area near Cleveland, MS. Total estimated Federal cost is $1,526,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Sep. 14, 1983. The stabilization of (1) bridge remains and will be accomplished by the Vicksburg District. 10. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 40.3 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Approved (1979) estimated Federal cost is $9,400,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $25,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item I of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed July 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. The summary report which documents these study results was submitted to LMVD in August 1986 and indicate that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system is necessary. These study results will be disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. 11. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-F. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include ten water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Monroe Floodwall, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports 12-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 in 1985 report and Monroe 84 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-F. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. An overall basin study including interim studies of the Monroe-West Monroe area, the Ouachita River Levees, the Arkansas Lakes is ongoing. 12. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the Southcentral portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba county, MS and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogulasa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rogolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank Levee system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law #98-63, dated July 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed with the exception of bank stabilization at one railroad bridge located in the clearing reach. Stabilization of this bridge is scheduled for construction in FY 87. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local spoonsor in May 85 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal Cost of this project including the remaining bank stabilization at the railroad bridge is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 89-88, dated August 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Local cooperation. For the Jackson-East Jackson and vicinity of Jackson Projects, the requirements are as prescribed in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended. This Act requires that a local sponsor provide the easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The Slidell Levee Project authorization required costsharing and new guidelines for local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement consistent with Public Law 99-88 was signed by the Slidell Local Sponsor and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on June 30, 1986. The local sponsors are as follows: Jackson-East Jackson, Rankin-Hinds Pearl River Flood Control Drainage District; Vicinity of Jackson Project, Pearl River Basin Development District; Slidell Levee Project, St. Tamany Levee District. Condition as of Sep. 30. Plans and specifications are being prepared for bank stabilization of a railroad bridge in the vicinity of Jackson Project. An overall basin study is underway. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS recommending the Shoccoe Dry Dam, and for Slidell, LA; recommending a 15 mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies are underway for Shoccoe Dam and the Slidell levee system. Flood control feasibility studies for the remainder of the basin include major emphasis on Carthage, Columbia, Picayune, and Monticello, Missisippi; Bogulusa, Louisiana, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin. Navigation Studies are being conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers and Port Bienville, MS. 13. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and travels through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction is being performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $1,214,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed November 16, 1983. A separate contract was let to biologically remove alligatorweed at Shaw, Mississippi, and follow-up with herbacide has been added. 14. POVERTY POINT, LA Location. The project area is located on the west bank of Bayou Macon approximately 4.5 miles northeast of Epps, in LA, West Carroll Parish and is referred to as Poverty Point on Bayou Macon. Existing project. The project provides for erosion 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT protection to prevent bank failure along a 340 foot length of the west bank of Bayou Macon adjacent to Poverty Point Museum. The project involved bank grading, construction of a stone toe and stone tiebacks, sand fill covered by engineer fabric and stone paving over the length of the project. Top of the stone paving is approximately the 100-year flood elevation on Bayou Macon. Local cooperation. Requirements of Local Cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 85 Annual Report. Condition of project. Work on this project was initiated Aug. 5, 1985, and was completed Oct. 4, 1985. 15. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River"-1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 16. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, Ar, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA, on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $59,650,000 Federal and $1,560,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. The Belcher realignment, river miles 299-306, and the Gahagan revetment, mile 225-L continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levees are complete and bank stabilization is 98 percent complete. 17. RED RIVER WATERWAY SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, LA Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1985) is $217,000,000 Federal and $27,500,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on pages 12-10 and 12-11 of Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. Completion of a General Re-evaluation Study will be required prior to construction of the project. The engineering and economic feasibility of constructing the authorized project must be reviewed in light of changed conditions within the project area. The Re-evaluation studies are inactive at this time, as a result of a lack of FY 86 funding. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of 30, 1986$,1 07,967 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. is $1,750,528. 12-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 19. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $199,596. Rehabilitation, total expenditures during FY 86 amounted to $23,445 which included work on the Red River below Denison Dam. Total Public Law 99 costs through Sep. 30, 1986, were $223,041. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Total FY 86 costs for emergency bank protection work was $185. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During FY 1986, an initial appraisal study was completed on Sugar Ditch at Tunica, MS at a cost of $7,500. Detailed studies continued on Canal 43, Desha and Lincoln Counties, AR, at a cost of $27,680; and Bayou Natchitoches, LA, at a cost of $183,336; and Pearl- Flowood, MS, at a cost of $51,484. Funds were also expended on studies at By-Way Ditch in the amount of $4,384 and at Lead Bayou in the amount of $2,428. Both studies were completed. 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 4. Yazoo River, MS New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20,406,000 13,638,600 Maint. 4,232,756 4,035,654 12,700,000 14,599,659 4,486,300 4,962,300 4,000,000 8,662,235 4,962,000 4,855,884 3,362,000 5,630,000 7,000,000 2,942,895 3,779,352 5,878,490 6,098,000 7,064,032 3,375,000 3,495,000 1,270,000 3,073,870 5,248,6191 5,248,6191 216,622,000 212,240,000 69,138,467 69,064,564 17,262,0002 15,674,607 6,825 6,825 60,736,000 91,313,000 87,090,000 58,456,160 91,266,477 81,574,966 545,000 510,042 164,273 103,139 916,000 465,295 48,000 7,700 -122,000 169,900 142,171 186,237 80,000 80,927 -66,000 1,892,000 1,537,703 1,602,515 861,437 10,000 64,744 91,585,000 330,724,0003 65,955,521 297,253,124 1,580,000 1,864,677 154,936 153,230 -147,000 74,782 66,200 66,200 6. Bayou Bartholomew New Work and Tributaries Approp. AK and LA Cost 7. Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA 8. Caddo Lake LA 9. Lead Bayou, MS 10. Ouachita River Levees, LA 12. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson Jackson-East Jackson 13. Porter Bayou, MS New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 489,000 982 400,000 331,125 132,200 -144,400 231,437 48,200 358,000 685,325 -6,000 48,000 15,000 162,003 265,000 445,448 177,000 187,221 200,000 234,820 710,000 1,195,000 43,737 1,820,453 500,000 506,187 350,000 290,515 -15,000 270,363 265,000 187,980 142,000 155,000 200,000 234,820 21,217 -60,000 -515 5,391 3,875,0003 4,082,3223 2,547,3563 1,787,5043 9,679,661 9,341,826 1,194,515 1,194,302 974,000 974,000 1,154,000 965,535 628,600 621,858 1,945,685 1,750,436 2,682,000 2,682,000 1,905,000 1,885,407 290,000 290,000 1,035,278 1,029,257 12-9 TABLE 12-A (CONTINUED) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 14. Poverty Point New Work State Commemora- Approp. - 47,500 202,500 - 250,000 tive Area, LA Cost - 47,500 207,500 - 250,000 16. Red River below New Work Denison Dam, Approp. 550,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 957,000 9,217,7003 Levees and Bank Cost 1,505,639 1,356,651 1,871,520 2,286,507 7,020,3173 28. Red River Water- New Work way, Shreveport, Approp. - 90,000 50,000 - 140,0003 LA, to Index, AR Cost 4,335 88,730 48,736 13,684 155,4853 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,828,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthall, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. YAZOO RIVER, MS (See Section 4 of Text) Removal of obstructions to navigation from mouth to Greenwood, MS, 189 miles. Nine-foot channel from mouth to Greenwood, mile 154.9 (persent mileage), with a lock and dam near Vicksburg, channel improvements, alteration of bridges, additional storage space in Sardis Lake to augment low river flows, and recreation features. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, AR AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see above). Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 7 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CADDO LAKE, LA (See Section 8 of Text) Maintenance Work. LEAD BAYOU, MS (See Section 9 of Text) Channel enlargement. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 342, 90tn Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 506, 98th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 39, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. 12-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 12-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 24, 1946, as amended Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 11 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER MS, AND LA (See Section 12 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 35 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering and construction of a levee system for Slidell LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 13 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 POVERTY POINT STATE COMMEMORATIVE AREA, LA (See Section 14 of Text) Provides for erosion protection against bank failure along a 340 foot length of the west bank of Bayou Macon by means of grading, constructing tie backs, and stone paving. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 16 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-12 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Pre- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 992 $ 51,700,000 bascule gated nagivation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 45,600,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 852 95,800,000 navigation pass with inflatable dam on crest; steel mitering lock gates. Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 852 75,900,000 hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Estimated Federal Cost $269,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 10,150,000 Total Estimated Cost $279,150,000 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation .65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1986 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1, 2 , 3, 4 - 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1, 2 , 4 - 1941 19,000 37,804 1 Big Black River, MS 1, 4, 5 - 1895 15,000 - 1 Big Sunflower River, MS 1, 4, 6, 7 - 1942 560,027 459,328 1 Boeuf River, LA 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 - 1949 30,000 103,737 1 Claiborne County Port, MS - 1985 2,000,000 2,000,000 1 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 Homochitto River, MS 4 - 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Lake Providence Harbor, LA - 1985 208,537 2,235,504 15 Little Missouri River, AR 1, 4, 5 - 1873 19,992 - 1 Little River, LA 1, 4, 5, 10 - 1890 1,500 - 1 Little Tallahatchie River, MS 1 7 - 1913 19,000 - 1 Madison Parish Port, LA - 1985 655,999 529,031 1 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS 1 7 11 - 1953 1,179,211 217,266 1 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA,1132 Felsenthal Canal 193712 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA - 1985 - -350,500 1 Pearl River, MS - 1985 1,354,400 1,306,423 1 Red River below Fulton, AR1 16, 17,18 - 1978 1,963,806 2,147,890 1 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX" 17,18 - 1969 - 1 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX1 1976 70,000 - Removing snags and wrecks from -1948 - 272,5001 Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers11 Rosedale Harbor, MS - 1985 2,000,000 1,517,584 1 Saline River, AR1, 3, 4, 5 - 1931 26,900 12,792 1 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS 1, 4, 5 - 1939 43,481 173,066 12-14 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1986 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA, 1 8 12 1949 38,367 85,352 1 Yalobusha River, MS 1, 4' 5, 14 - 1937 7,000 15,936 1 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway- Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway- Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-15 TABLE 12-E REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of BoeufRiver and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7008 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0008 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA (i) 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $198,704,7434 21.. ISnece liunddeivs idu$a5l, 8re0p0o,0r0ts0 herein. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, for water supply, to be project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) reimbursed by local interests. was $4,190,000. 3. Actual cost of completed project. TABLE 12-F RESERVOIR OPERATIONS FISCAL YEAR 1984 See Section Storage in Text Project (acre feet) Inflows Outflow 24. Bayou Bodcau 2 Oct. 1, 1981 249 - - Reservoir, LA Sep. 30, 982 310 - - Jul. 2, 1982 (Max) 11,340 - - Jun. 29, 1982 (Max) - 1,664 - Jul.2,1982 (Max)- - 1,125 36. Wallace lake, LA Oct. 1, 1981 7,655 - - Sep. 30, 1982 7,319 Apr. 24, 1982 (Max 11,739 - - Apr. 23, 1982 (Max - 1,013 - Apr. 24, 1982 (Max - 634 1. Cubic feet per second. 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 15 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR 2 and LA - 1,158 - - $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA - - - 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 - - - - 243,336' Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake - - - 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River - - - 1,950,000 Garland City, AR , - - - 1,450,000' Maniece Bayou, AR - - - 970,032' McKinney Bayou, AR7 - - - - 5,610,000' Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 6, 9 - - - 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR and LA", 3 - - - - 59,650,000 Total 99,191,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ........................................................ $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) .. .................................... 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ..... ........................................................................ 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA .. ............................................ 480,000 East Point ........................................................................... 67,000 Garland City, AR ......................................................................... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ....................................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................................... 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA ......................... 1,560,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 12-H RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 15 of Text) Flood For Last Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,740" 3 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,200' 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 299,529' 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5' 6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481 7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,809' 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,927" 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,426' 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,435' 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711 3 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District August, 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1986 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA Bayou Pierre, LA Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1, 2 Big Black River, MS 3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA 3, 4 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA 1, 5, 6 Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AK Buffalo River, MS7 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA 1 8 DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR East Point, LA Garland City, AR Grant Parish below Colfax, LA 1, 3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR1, 3 Homochitto River, MS3 Maniece Bayou, AR1, 2 McKinney Bayou Finn Bayou Segment, AR Monroe Floodwall, LA Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AK Natchez Port Area, MS 3', 4 Natchitoches Parish, LA1, 2 Pineville, Red River, LA3, 4 Posten Bayou, AR 1� Red River Parish, LA 1, 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' Saline Point, LA 1, 3 Aug. 1977 1956 1948 1985 1985 1951 1956 1966 1945 1985 1940 1978 1938 1985 1969 1976 1941 1941 1956 1970 19639 1984 1951 1985 1969 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 $ 1,653,189 319,200 243,3362 910,185 248,823 34,023,108 1,655,700 70,348 72,033,992 286,069 1,335,841 38,809 88,006 205,000 970,9322 2,560,000 16,516,689 538,000 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 $ - 1,833,125 70,241 Apr. 1955 Jan. 1948 Apr. 1961 FY 1939 - Jun. 1939 670,750 3 - 3 43,475,820 Oct. 1955 - Jul. 1978 28,039,599 Dec. 1971 - Aug. 1968 - Jul. 1974 144,650 31,169,578 3 3 Aug. 1969 May 1950 5 - Aug. 1955 - Dec. 1951 3 Mar. 1953 12-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 12-I (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1986 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 - 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA - 1985 - 258,183 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ............ $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ..... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ............................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR ................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ............... 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205 Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Deferred indefinitely because of insufficient justifi cation under present conditions. 8. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 9. Date authorized. 10. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 86 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) ($) ($) Flood Control Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin, AR & LA -12046 $ 642,681 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA -12234 1,087,156 Pine Bluff Metro, AR -12015 9,166 Subtotal 1,739,003 Comprehensive Studies (150) Red River Below Denison Dan (153) -81129 236,910 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 18,937 Review of FERC Licenses (172) -53857 5,947 Subtotal 24,884 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 1,982 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 0 Technical and Engineering Assistance on Shoreline and Streambank (188) -51731 0 Subtotal 1,982 TOTAL (Category 100) 2,002,779 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Inspection of Dams (230) Inventory of Dams 0 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 170,885 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 15,482 Subtotal 186,367 TOTAL (Category 200) 186,367 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) Flood Control Projects (450) Pearl River, Slidell, LA (451)-12442 211,990 Pearl River, Shoccoe Dam, MS (452)-12444 244,054 Subtotal 456,044 TOTAL (Category 400) 456,044 ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Navigation Projects (620) Locks and Dams, Yazoo River, MS (622) 00083 0 Flood Control Projects (650) Local Protection, Red River Waterway, Shreveport to Index (651) -75023 13,684 Local Protection, Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS (651) -75426 3,581 Subtotal 17,265 TOTAL (Category 600) 17,265 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $2,662,455 12-21 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Tables 1. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ Flood Control 2. Hatchie River, Alcorn Co, MS ......... 3. Humboldt, TN ...................... 4. Nonconnah Creek Interceptor Sewer, M em phis, TN ....................... 5. Inspection of completed flood control projects .... ......................... 6. Flood control work under special authorization ........................ Table 13-A 13-1 Table 13-B Table 13-C 13-1 13-2 13-2 13-2 13-2 Table 13-D Table 13-E Cost & Financial Statement .... Authorizing Legislation ....... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... Active General Investigations ................ Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). No work was done this period under this authority. Flood Control 2. HATCHIE RIVER, ALCORN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Location. The project is located in Alcorn County in northeast Mississippi, along the Hatchie River 5 miles upstream of U.S. Highway 72. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. The project consists of removal of a 1,000-foot-long massive logjam where the Hatchie River channel was completely blocked and stream flows were diverted into the adjacent bottomland hardwood forests. Timber will be restored or preserved on over 1,100 acres of valuable forests. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project and all necessary modifications or relocations of roads, bridges, and utilities other than railroad bridges and bridge approaches; to the extent of the legal authority of the Hatchie Drainage District of Alcorn County, hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed works, except those damages due to the sole fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the Hatchie Drainage District of Alcorn County, maintain and operate the completed works without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the 13-1 Page 13-4 13-4 13-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control after project construction; pay all costs associated with project features designated to be local interest responsibilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. The channel blockage was removed in August 1985 and the remaining cleanup was completed in Feb. 1986. 3. HUMBOLDT, TN Location. Humboldt is located in Gibson County, TN. Existing project. Authorized July 23, 1984, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of clearing and snagging approximately 2,200 feet of existing channel and the construction of 2,600 feet of enlarged channel. The project will provide a 10-year level of protection for area residents and is expected to reduce average annual flood damages by 64 percent. The current estimated construction cost for the project is $1,110,000. The project assurances of local cooperation have been furnished. The construction contract for required channel improvement was awarded in July 1986. It has been determined that no adverse environmental impacts will result from construction of the project. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 13-4 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel work is expected to be completed in October 1986. Remaining work consists of construction of a railroad drainage structure. 4. NONCONNAH CREEK INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Location. The project is located in southeastern Memphis, Tennessee, along the right (north) bank of Nonconnah Creek through a reach extending from about 600 feet upstream to 100 feet downstream of the Highway 78 (Lamar Ave.) bridge. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. The project consists of providing bank protection along a 700 foot reach of eroding creek bank to protect a major interceptor sewer line and the U.S. Highway 78 bridge. Protection is to be provided via grading and shaping the bank and armoring it with riprap stone. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary relocations and alterations of buildings and utilities, sewers, related and special facilities; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Memphis, Tennessee; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Memphis, Tennessee, maintain and operate the project works after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; assume any construction costs in excess of $250,000, the monetary limit established in Section 27, Public Law 93-251; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; if applicable, adjust all claims covering water rights; comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. The city of Memphis, Tennessee has provided the required local cooperation assurances and rights-ofway. Condition as of Sep. 30. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on September 30, 1986. The work is expected to be completed in December 1986. 5. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $118,480 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1986, was $1,168,738. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 6. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). 12.-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT During this period $32,594 was expended on Tuscumbia River, MS & TN, and $31,861 on Cane Creek, Martin, TN. During FY 1986 $6,551 was expended for detail studies on Nonconnah Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN, and $19,358 on Turner Creek, Corinth, MS. Emergency flood control activities - rehabilitation of private levee (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost was $88,056.19 for rehabilitation of Dyer County Private Levee, and $248,878 for disaster preparedness. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83d Cong., as amended. During this period $10,802 was expended on Hatchie River, MS. 13-3 TABLE 13-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 2. Hatchie River, New Work Alcorn Co., MS Approp. $ - $ - $ 62,676 $ 10,802 $ 73,478 Cost - - 62,673 10,802 73,475 3. Humboldt, TN New Work Approp. - 155,000 - 333,333 488,333 Cost - 124,150 11,539 349,736 485,425 4. Nonconnah Creek New Work Interceptor Approp. - - - 30,000 30,000 Sewer, Memphis, Cost - - - 29,435 29,435 TN TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents HATCHIE RIVER (See Sec. 3 of Text) Sep. 24, 1954, Clearing and snagging within channel. Approved Jul 24, 19853 as amended HUMBOLDT, TN (See Sec. 4 of Text) June 30, 1948, Channel improvement within the city of Humboldt. Approved Jul. 23, 19841 as amended NONCONNAH INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND U.S. HIGHWAY 78 (See Sec. 5 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946, Stabilization - stream bank caving. Approved Oct. 18, 19852 as amended 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 3. Authorized under authority of Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood control Act, as amended. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1986 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO - 1984 $768,992 $ 1,566,991 Dec 80 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork" 2- 1912 25,000 12,818 - Helena Harbor, AR - 1984 90,847 3,439,163 Sep 63 Hickman Harbor, KY - 1984 149,827 3,739,720 Jan 63 New Madrid Harbor, MO - 1984 196,373 385,509 Oct 70 Obion River, TN" - 1911 28,716 - - Osceola Harbor, AR - 1984 269,115 4,949,913 Nov 74 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4 5 -1948 - 318,833 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR" 2 - 1942 92,000 300,449- White River, AR (below Newport) - 1984 169,994 16,379,742- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN - 1984 586,500 8,151,431 1959 1. No commerce. * 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and tributaries." 13-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR 1 Bradford, TN Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR 1 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL2 Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN2 Dyersburg, TN (SW) Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Huntingdon, TN Long Lake Area Helena, AR Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL 4 Nixon Creek, TN 2 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No.90 AR Treasure Island, MO US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY Mo. and Yr. Deauthorized 6 May 81 6 May 81 Sep 1980 Jul 1983 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For: 1977 1937 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1985 1983 1983 1960 1955 1952 1983 1983 1985 1985 1981 1984 1983 Cost to Sep. 1986 Operation and Construction Maintenance $ 70,363 $ - 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,6493 1,820,869 155,280 2,900,281 61,281 11,141,199 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 249,999 238,000 161,000 861,528 369,200 1,674,180 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 4. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 5. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-6 Mo. and Yr. Completed Dec 1983 Feb 1964 Jun 1980 Jun 1962 Oct 1976 Aug 1985 May 1959 Oct 19596 Dec 1951 Nov 1981 Sep 1980 Dec 1984 Sep 1985 Mar 1978 Mar 1983 Oct 1976 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 86 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $ 24,026 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) $ 24,026 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 242,017 TOTAL (Category 200) $242,017 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $266,043 13-7 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) ................. 2. Kaskaskia River, IL .............. 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes L&D 26 Replacement) ..... 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO, and IL .... Flood Control 5. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ....... 6. Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 7. Hartwell Drainage and Levee D istrict, IL ..................... 8. Hillview Drainage and Levee D istrict, IL ..................... 9. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ............... 10. Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL ............. 11. Meramec River Basin, MO ......... 11A. Meramec Park Lake, MO .......... 11B. Pine Ford Lake, MO .............. 12. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee D istrict, IL ..................... 13. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 14. Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 15. Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, M O .................... Page Flood Control (cont.) 16. Nutwood Drainage and Levee 14-2 District, IL .................... 14-2 17. Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO ....... 18. Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL .... 14-2 19. Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 14-2 20. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................. 21. Navigation work under 14-3 special authorization .............. 22. Flood control work under 14-3 special authorization .............. 14-3 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 14-4 23. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO .................. 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-5 General Investigations 24. Active investigations ................ Tables 14-5 Table 14-A Table 14-B 14-5 Table 14-C 14-5 14-6 14-6 Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Cost and Financial Statement . Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities ....... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Active General Investigations (96X3121) ..... Page 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-8 14-8 14-8 14-9 14-11 14-13 14-13 14-14 14-16 14-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Location. The river rises in Champaign County, IL, about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of State. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, Il, or about 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1984) of $145,060,000. Non-Federal project cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted on behalf of the United States on Sept. 10, 1965; these assurances were supplemented on Aug. 7, 1972, to incorporate the provisions of PL 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on the lock and dam, railroad relocations, and the grade control structure. Engineering and design continued on remaining construction items. Project is essentially complete. Maintenance. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN. (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES L&D 26 REPLACEMENT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1986) of $181,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $245,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3d sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: Contract was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 71 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Maintenance. Work consisted of 2,230 feet of dike and 18,755 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT hired labor performed channel dredging removing 2,925,100 cubic yards of material from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. Flood Control 5. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottomlands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on Jun. 25, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 was continued. This work included ditching contracts and the Blue Waters Ditch pumping station. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. 6. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene County, Ii, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 23.8 and 32.3 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, ILMO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 15.9 miles of levees, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of two highway closure structures and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,470 acres of land, 9,735 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1985) is $6,380,000. Non- Federal cost is $953,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 7. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene County on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 38.2 and 43.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, ILMO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 12.3 miles of new or enlarged levees, altering discharge line of pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 9,630 acres of land, 8,955 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50- year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1985) is $12,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $1,120,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-5 of Fiscal Year 14-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was deferred due to the inability of the project to qualify for continuation of funding. 8. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 43.2 and 50.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 14.3 miles of levee, alteration of discharge lines for three existing pumping stations, construction of a railroad closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to the Village of Hillview and to 13,070 acres of agricultural land against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1985) is $12,300,000. Non- Federal cost is $1,220,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was deferred due to the inability of the project to qualify for continuation of funding. 9. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $14,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Construction is complete on the gravity drains. Plans and specifications for raising and enlarging the levee are complete and construction was continued on this item. 10. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Scott County, IL on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 63.5 and 67.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, ILMO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000). Existing project. Project provides for raising a portion of the existing levee and construction of two railroad closure structures. Project will provide protection to 5,700 acres of land against a flood of 100- year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $1,100,000. Non-Federal cost is $230,000. Project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1985, Public Law 98-360, 98th Cong., 2nd Session. Local cooperation. The village of Naples, IL, signed a letter of intent, dated March 13, 1985, indicating a willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation including provisions of the Uniform Relocations and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 (PL 91-646) and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611). Local Cooperation requirements are: furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary and accomplish all relocations necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, save and except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was completed on all items. 11. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO Location. The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meramec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, MO, and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Irondale, and 1-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and 1-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 11A. MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MO Location. Dam will be at mile 108.7 on Meramec River in Franklin County near Sullivan, MO. Reservoir will be mainly in Crawford, Franklin, and Washington counties, MO. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project as authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act provides for construction of an earth dam about 167 feet high with a crest length of 3,000 feet. Reservoir will provide 1 million acre-feet of storage and provide flood protection for 11,862 acres of flood plain in the Meramec River valley above the mouth of Bourbeuse River, and partial protection for 20,209 acres of land below the Bourbeuse. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, storage, and recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Estimated total project cost (1981) is $220,000,000, including $22,506,000 local reimbursement for water supply. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. State of Missouri, acting through its State Water Resources Board and under authority of the General Assembly of State of Missouri, executed assurances for water supply on Aug 23, 1967. The assurances were reviewed by the Office of the Attorney General, State of Missouri, and it is his opinion that the State of Missouri has the legal authority and financial capability to execute said assurances. These assurances have been approved by the Chief of Engineers. A water-supply contract will be entered into with the sponsor before any use of the water-supply storage provided under this contract. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128. Land is being disposed of in accordance with deauthorizing act. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operations and maintenance of existing facilities. liB. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake will extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning previously funded but not completed. 12. McGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, IL, on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $25,500,000. Non-Federal cost is $930,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is essentially complete. 13. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK, AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL Location. The levee district is in Morgan and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 67.0 and 72.2 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 11.0 miles of new or enlarged levee, a pumping 14-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 8,215 acres of land, 7,640 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 575 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $12,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $1,030,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 14. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The project is in Cass and Morgan Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 72.2 and 79.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Qunicy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Maps Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 15.9 miles of new or enlarged levee, closure structure, drainage facilities, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 7,510 acres of land, 6,980 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 530 acres of non crop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1985) is $10,000,000. Non- Federal cost is $560,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-10 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 15. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO Location. Area 8 is in Lincoln and Pike Counties, MO, on west bank of Mssissippi River between river miles 249 and 261 above the Ohio River. Small community of Elsberry lies within the area. (See Quincy sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The 1966 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess.) authorized the raising and enlarging of existing levees to provide 24.4 miles of riverfront, flank, and back levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of drainage structure, highway and railroad closure structures, and alterations to existing pumping plants. The project has been reduced in scope to consist of replacing one existing drainage structure, replacing an obsolete stream driven pump unit with a new one of 150 cubic feet per second capacity, and rehabilitation of the pump station. Project will afford protection to the area against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $2,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $20,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 14-10 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project is complete. Operation and maintenance manual was completed. 16. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $6,510,000. Non- Federal cost is $450,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the general investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 17. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO Location. Districts are in Perry County, MO, and Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 95 and 111 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see 475 of Annual Report for 1968. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Existing project. Project area contains about 26,881 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 13 feet on the Chester, IL, gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation or seepage, or a combination thereof. Authorized project provides for construction of four pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $8,812,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances were furnished by local interests (presently, Boil Brule Levee District, MO). on Nov. 16, 1978, and were accepted Nov. 27, 1978, by the District Engineer under delegated authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is essentially complete on all four pumping stations. 18. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, IL. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, relocation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, conservation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area development. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $43,100,900, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,060,900. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-12 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurance of local cooperation and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities in connection with project completion were performed. Lands acquired to date are 39,819 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. 19. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Madison County, IL, on left bank of Mississippi River between river miles 195 and 203 above Ohio River. District includes bottom lands between river and bluffs and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the south to opposite lock and dam No. 26 at Alton, IL, on the north. Small industrial cities of Hartford, Wood River, Roxana, and East Alton and part of Alton riverfront, lie within the district. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1938 Flood Control Act authorized raising, enlarging, and extending existing levee system to provide 20.8 miles of levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations to existing or construction of new pumping plants; surfacing service road on levee crown, making necessary alterations to railroad tracks and bridges at levee crossings, seepage corrective measures and construction of a low-water dam at mouth of Wood River. Project will afford protection to this district against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total construction cost (1982) is $18,600,000 (excluding $23,000 contributed funds). Flood Control Act of 1965 modified 1938 Flood Control Act to provide for construction of a pumping station with collector ditches and necessary appurtenant facilities for removal of water impounded by existing levee. This portion of the project has been declared inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act is complete except for a closure structure. Construction was initiated on this item. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD PROJECTS CONTROL Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $388,483 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal period is $5,459,419. 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies cost for fiscal year were $24,849 for Southeast Missouri Port study. 14-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for fiscal year were $47,271 for Columbia Levee and Drainage District, Monroe County, IL; $67,766 for Crooked Creek, Bollinger County, MO; $34,325 for E. Cape Girardeau Main Ditch, IL; $218,432 for St. Peters, MO; and $33,036 for Modoc Levee and Drainage District, IL. Emergency Bank Protection.. Costs for fiscal year were $22,753 for Illinois River, Hardin, IL. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $160,578 for disaster preparedness, and $39,987 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 23. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on all major items. Work remaining consists of minor items on recreation facilities. Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. General Investigations 24. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 14-F which covers: Surveys, Collection and study of basic data, and Research and development activities. 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 2. Kaskaskia River IL (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 5. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 6. Eldred & Spankey Drainage and Levee District, IL 7. Hartwell Drainage & Levee District, IL 8. Hillview Drainage & Levee District IL 9. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 10. Mouvaise Terre Drainage & Levee District, IL 11A. Meramec Park Lake, MO 11B. Pine Ford Lake, MO 12. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL 13. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek and Coon Run Drainage & Levee Districts, IL New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $400,000 $5,209,000 $5,300,000 $14,300,000 388,140 3,885,032 6,419,905 14,204,126 1,131,856 1,036,248 587,000 1,370,000 1,372,000 911,518 1,345,081 1,177,658 0 104,348 0 0 18,626 0 2,437,000 2,610,000 4,197,000 3,541,000 1,574,639 3,440,369 4,571,548 3,415,685 8,010,656 7,490,000 12,264,000 9,545,000 10,191,370 7,157,647 12,217,020 9,771,652 950,000 2,597,000 3,450,000 1,890,000 1,011,724 2,167,981 2,858,126 2,446,626 180,000 161,250 00 0 10,021 0 572 500,000 375,659 0 158,733 00 00 00 512,750 16,250 00 00 00 1,057,000 2,750,000 451,595 2,807,469 O 0 0 149,447 0 -42,325 595,000 670,277 0 -5,815 0 16,897 326,000 412,597 0 366 0 36,346 379,000 362,268 0 721 8,012,900 5,420,000 1,780,000 8,793,102 5,366,819 2,674,729 119,000 516,340 00 00 00 957,000 1,626,323 0 337,089 0 26,870 426,000 454,511 -36,000 341 0 136,924 0 1,408 $147,400,0001 146,989,162' 11,731,256 11,485,246 1,158,356 1,118,160 174,504,6002 174,267,1452 214,956,1333 214,460,9423 16,959,3264 16,406,3945 961,750 862,574 875,000 875,000 622,000 622,000 433,000 433,000 8,707,000 8,447,668 600,000 486,536 30,568,0006 30,542,7776 3,515,600 3,501,531 3,644,001 3,644,001 24,920,300 24,807,032 370,000 370,000 14-9 TABLE 14-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 14. Meredosia Lake New Work and Willow Creek Approp. 0 0 0 0 345,000 Drainage & Levee Cost 845 0 0 0 345,000 District, IL 15. Mississippi River New Work Agricultural Area Approp. 0 0 0 0 2,137,000 No. 8, IL Cost 6,190 5,634 4,063 169 2,137,000 16. Nutwood Drain- New Work age & Levee Approp. 0 0 0 0 670,000 District, IL Cost 8,993 120 0 0 670,000 17. Perry County New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 1,503,000 270,300 16,000 0 7,968,700 7 District Nos. 1, Cost 1,807,562 266,200 47,146 859 7,968,7007 2, & 3, MO 18. Rend Lake, Big New Work Muddy, IL Approp. 0 0 - 0 43,700,900 (Regular Funds) Cost 81,753 35,976 24,820 17,224 43,671,786 Maint. Approp. 2,537,900 1,958,000 3,302,500 2,759,600 26,016,8008 Cost 2,533,327 2,072,978 3,103,736 2,812,138 25,758,0268 Code 711 Funds New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,060,900 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,060,900 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Cost 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Maint. Contrib. 0 304,348 300,000 300,000 3,486,303 Cost 0 293,485 305,279 247,328 3,428,047 19. Wood River New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 450,000 1,000,000 0 118,000 16,707,82110 District, IL Cost 386,143 424,513 362,773 416,517 16,667,26210 23. Clarence Cannon New Work 33,849,700 10,240,300 3,622,000 820,000 312,019,02811 Dam and Reservoir, Approp. 34,463,424 8,922,842 2,948,571 1,795,702 309,663,90411 Salt River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. 1,891,100 2,074,000 3,260,500 3,929,600 16,080,660 Cost 1,937,491 2,127,691 3,190,444 3,633,059 15,588,093 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 7. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 8. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 9. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 10. Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 11. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 14, 1984 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 6 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 9 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. 14-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Senate and House Committee resolutions, Oct. 12, 19725 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 11 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 12 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 14 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO (See Section 15 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and alter pumping plant to reduce flooding. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 16 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO (See Section 17 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL (See Section 18 of Text) Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 19 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 23 of Text) Modified act of 28 Jun. 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple-purpose project. Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present designation. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 360, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-298, 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Inactive. 4. All work completed. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1986 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO 1 - 1883 $ 12,000 $ - Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL Nov. 1977 19622 - Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582 - - Moccasin Springs, MO - 1969 76,4363- Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Nov. 1977 19542 - - Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Nov. 1977 19502 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL -1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 2. Year authorized. 23, 1900. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. TABLE 14-D LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Estimated See Required Total Estimated Section Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to in Text Project Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 11. Meramec River Basin, MO Lakes: Meramec Park1 197,494,000 22,506,000 220,000,000 (1981) Union2 101,305,000 11,695,000 113,000,000 (1982) Pine Ford' 115,926,800 31,073,200 147,000,000 (1984) Irondale 8,744,370 66,700,000 (1982) 1-;382 27,294,000 2,306,000 29,600,000 (1982) Recreation facilities: Angler-use sites2 2,140,000 2,140,000 4,280,000 (1982) 1. Separate reports are included herein. 2. See 1979 Annual Report for details. 3. See 1967 Annual Report for details. 14-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1986 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO - 1967 $ - $ - Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL. Cache River Diversion, IL - 1953 2,837,114 - 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Oct. 1978 1959 22,000 -- Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 - 1965 5,157,805 - 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL - 1981 42,819,400 39,692,401 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL -1955 185,700 - 1955 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 2 -1964 4,984,500 - 1963 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL -1981 2,818,000 - Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL - 1959 5,889,500 - 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL - 1976 1,720,000 - 1976 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL - 1963 1,920,600 - 1963 Eldrid, IL Nov. 1979 19623 - - - Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)4 -1950 55,415 - Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended) 4 - 1953 - 1,033,279 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) - 1952 50,000 - Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) -1946 25,000 - Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL -1970 1,154,800 - 1958 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL -1971- Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL -1959 4,677,900 - 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District IL - 1981 5,829,000 - Mar. 1981 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL' - - - Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 297,460 - 1949 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL' .. Lake Shelbyville, IL - 1981 44,000,000 36,936,298 Sep. 1978 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Nov. 1979 1979 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Nov. 1979 1979 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Oct. 1978 1978 496,000 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1944 249,738 - 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL - 1955 164,183 - 1955 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1986 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO - 1980 79,265,166 - Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Nov. 1979 1967 - - Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO - 1967 - - Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures - - 85,422 - Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1957 939,569 - 1957 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL 5 - 1970 6,005,127 - 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL - 1959 3,882,600 - 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 1,866,910 - 1959 Richland Creek, IL - 1969 401,000 -- Riverland Levee District, MO Aug. 1977 1936- - - Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL 1 - - - - Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 1936 - - St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 1936- - - Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, IL - 1957 2,123,700 - Aug. 1956 Union Lake, MO6 - 1979 4,917,359 -- Urban areas at Alton, IL - 1960 192,000 -- Village of New Athens, IL - 1981 1,983,000 - Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL 7 - 1967 91,952 - 1967 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO Nov. 1977 1936 - 1. Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 23, 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 2. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. 3. Year authorized. 4. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 5. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 6. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 14-15 TABLE 14-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 86 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Control Studies (120) St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO & IL -55040 Ste. Genevieve, MO -80061 Creve Coueur Crk, MO -12440 Sub-total Special Studies (140) Meramac R. Basin Water Supply, Mo. -14056 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Review of FERC Licenses -53857 Sub-total Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agric. - Soil Cons. Service -51840 Plan Assist to State of Ill. -14817 Plan Assist to State of Mo. -14829 Sub-total TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) -82030, and 82040 Hydrology Studies (260) -53820 TOTAL (Category 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) St. Louis Harbor, Mo. & Ii. -10184 Maline Creek, Mo. -12297 TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Eldred & Spankey D&LD, IL -00071 Hartwell D&LD, IL -00073 Hillview D&LD, IL - 00075 Meredosia Lake & Willow Creek D&LD, IL -00079 Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek & Coon Run D&LD, IL -00069 Meremac River Basin, MO -75412 Nutwood D&LD, IL -00623 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 14-16 $ 957,599 1,589 180,343 1,139,531 33,844 18,984 1,310 20,294 2,943 7,081 12,692 22,716 $1,216,385 $ 217,745 $ 652,369 204,500 13,245 319,980 332,389 1,916 4,830 7,518 1,284 189,264 29,508 23,764 $ 258,084 $2,344,584 GALVESTON, TX DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) ................... 2 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX .................. 2 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX................ 2 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ........... 3 5. Freeport Harbor, TX ...................... 3 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ......... 4 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ........... 5 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX ................ 6 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX .............. 6 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX ............... 7 11. Texas City Channel, TX ................... 7 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ........... 7 12A. Anahuac Channel, TX .................... 8 12B. Channel to Liberty, TX .................... 8 12C. Wallisville Lake, TX ...................... 8 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 9 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................ 9 Beach Erosion Control 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ................. 9 Flood Control 16. Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX ............ 17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX .......... 18. Clear Creek, TX ........................ 9 9 10 Flood Control (cont.) Pa 19. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection ............... 20. Taylors Bayou, TX ....................... 21. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection ............... 22. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ......... 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works .......................... 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................... General Investigations 25. Surveys ................................ 26. Planning and Engineering ................ 27. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ Tables Table 15-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation ............ Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ Table 15-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ Table 15-E Total Cost of Existing Projects ...... Table 15-F Channel Dimensions .............. Table 15-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ............... Table 15-H Dredging Operations .............. 15-1 ige 12 12 12 13 16 27 27 28 29 32 34 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildwife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Eradication work of hydrilla, water hyacinth and alligator weed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Estimated cost for new work is $2,019,000 Federal (Corps) and $693,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Eradication work by the State of Texas continued. The control of submerged species, hydrilla and Eurasian watermilfoil was initiated. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was continued during the year. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was placed in the inactive category in 1980. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. A contract for construction of retaining levees for an aquaculture project in the amount of $203,149 was completed in FY 86. This project was initiated under a joint program with Waterways Experiment Station to assess the feasibility of utilizing disposal areas for productive purposes in idle periods or between dredging cycles. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 3. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) Previous Project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. Existing project dimensions for channel are shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerece. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 15-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $70,724,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects; and non-Federal $17,981,068 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $6,648,840 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1986 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Work remaining consists of deepening deepdraft channels to 45 feet from Beacon 82 through Viola Turning Basin; widening of channels and basins; and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to Beacon 82 at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. Disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Sec. 101 of 1968 River and Harbor Act and Sec. 124 of Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Fiscal year cost for contract for berm stabilization of Rincon Levees was $75,000. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 15-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and 15-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $58,827,000 Federal (Corps); and $29,536,000 non-Federal, including $19,758,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $6,217,448 lands, $2,668,000 levees and spillways, and $532,000 relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970. For work authorized by this Act, the Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 26 June 1986, requires that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $8,568,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $532,000, contribute in cash onehalf of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $360,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $18,640,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design work continued on the 45-foot project. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. Repairs to Galveston groins cost $72,626. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 15-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (GALVESTON DIST.) Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about onefourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel and the 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide channel from mile 8.2 to mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou are inactive. (See Table 15-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River; dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Texas; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 Feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $76,664,000, Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $16,105,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,400,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $4,683,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and $2,930,000 other costs Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1986 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for inactive portions, and provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for 15-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,400,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of jetties at the Mouth of the Colorado River completed at a fiscal year cost of $1,013,064. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $672,914, including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $635,676, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. Repairs to Port O'Connor Dike cost $709,977. Cost for construction of levees and spillways on contract for dredging Cow Bayou to Bastrop Bay was $350,000. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 7 miles long from turning basin to Main Street, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 15-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas" Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341,11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for inactive portions. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX. Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $14,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $1,793,700 non-Federal, including $127,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $984,000 levees and spillways and $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance: Levee rehabilitation cost $1,888,791. 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 15-E 15-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location. Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 12B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from -Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-ofway and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co&s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 11C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 5,600-acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 4 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non- Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $67,700,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1986 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. The schedule for the completion of construction for the modified project is dependent on the time required to coordinate with the courts to lift the injunction, and the availability of construction funds. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest contribution is estimated at $9,270,000. 15-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for the non-overflow dam, Interstate 10 to the Lock site, is underway. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Project Double .Bayou Date of Survey Jun-Jul 1986 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Reconnaissance study to investigate dredging the mouth of the Brazos River Diversion Channel for use by commercial navigation was completed at a fiscal year cost of $11,641. Study has been terminated. Reconnaissance study to investigate shorter alignments and bend easing on Lydia Ann Channel to Cover Harbor was completed at a fiscal year cost of $18,309. Study has been terminated. Initial appraisal reports on the feasibility of developing small craft harbors at Port Arthur, Texas, and at Corpus Christi, Texas, were completed at a fiscal year cost of $7,500 each. Beach Erosion 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. (October 1,1986 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Fiscal year cost for the contract was $524,204. r f 1 I imately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. 15-9 Flood Control 16. ARROYO COLORADO, RIO HONDO, TX Location. The project is located on Arroyo Colorado at Rio Hondo, Texas which is approximately ten miles northeast of Harlingen, Texas and 30 miles north northwest of Brownsville, Texas. Existing project. The project provides for bank protection to 400 feet of the east bank of Arroyo Colorado downstream of Farm-to-Market Road 106. Estimated cost for new work is $201,300 Federal (Corps) and $7,000 non- Federal. Project was completed in 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Project was fiscally completed. 17. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost of new work is $148,200,000 Federal (Corps) including $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds) and $9,300,00 for Dam Safety Assurance, and $98,791,000 non-Federal, consisting of $86,891,000 for lands and relocations, and $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1, 1986 base price.) Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was completed in 1969. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work to be accomplished includes raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities at Cullen Park was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approx REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Construction of picnic areas, access roads, parking areas, and rough grading of ball fields for the Community Park West (Phase 1A) were completed in July 1986. Construction of additional access, parking, restrooms, group shelters, and completion of ball fields for the Community Park West (Phase 1B) and construction of a velodrome were substantially completed in July 1986. The fiscal year Federal cost of cost-shareable items was $96,000. Dam Safety Assurance: Raising Main Dam, Barker Dam, was awarded in June 1986. Fiscal year costs were $137,730. Raising Main Dam, Addicks Dam, was awarded in July 1986. Fiscal Year costs were $50,000. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. 18. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing Project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 18.5, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $41,100,000 Federal (Corps) and $33,000,000 non- Federal consisting of $4,500,000 cash contributions, $15,700,000 for lands, and $12,800,000 for relocations (October 1, 1986 base price). Local Cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 30 June 1986, required local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. 19. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX, (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffing Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $59,703,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,036,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,016,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,168,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. Investigation of levee settlement was performed. 20. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal 15-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Thylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $39,600,000 Federal (Corps) and $21,560,000 non- Federal, including $13,500,000 cash contribution, $4,331,000 lands, and $3,729,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. A contract for construction of the Salt Water Gate was completed at a fiscal year cost of $1,013,211. Enlargement of discharge channel in Gulf Intracoastal Waterway cost $2,587,999. 21. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962. All work is complete except for the La Marque Pumping Plant and drainage structures. Construction of the La Marque Pumping Plant was initiated in September 1982. Estimated cost for new work is $37,982,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,627,000 non-Federal, including $13,937,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,363,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of La Marque Pumping Plant was continued at a fiscal year cost of $239,920. Contract for interior drainage structures was completed at a fiscal year cost of $537,906. 22. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Planning is in progress on Little Vince Bayou. Estimated cost for new work is $20,100,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,300,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,100,000 for lands and $12,200,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1986 base price.) Local cooperation. Sec. 203, 1962 Flood Control Act, applies. Local interests have acquired all real estate and accomplished all required relocations on Vince Bayou. On Little Vince Bayou, local interests have acquired all real estate and accomplished 90 percent of the required relocations. Operations during fiscal year. Fiscal year cost for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou, mile 0.7 to 2.7, was $1,918,956. Fiscal year cost for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou, mile 2.7 to 3.1 was $135,340. Fiscal year cost for channel rectification on Little Vince, mile 0 to mile 0.7, was $559,380. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $116,725. Date of Project Inspection Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Chocolate Bayou, Salt Water Barrier, TX Vince and Little Vince Bayou, TX San Diego Creek, Alice, TX Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX Arroyo Colorado, Emergency Streambank Protection, Rio Hondo, TX Port Arthur & Vicinity, TX, Hurrican Flood Protection Guadalupe River Flood Protection, Victoria, TX Little Cypress Bayou Flood Protection, Orange, TX Brays Bayou, Channel Rectification, Houston, TX Texas City & Vicinity, TX, Hurricane-Flood Protection Colorado River, Flood Protection, Matagorda, TX Galveston Seawall, Galveston, TX Three Rivers, TX, Flood Protection Lavaca-Navidad River Flood Protection, Halletsville, TX White Oak Bayou, Channel Rectification, Houston, TX Freeport & Vicinity, TX, Hurricane-Flood Protection October 1985 October 1985 November 1985 November 1985 November1985 February 1986 February 1986 February 1986 April 1986 April 1986 June 1986 June 1986 July 1986 July 1986 August 1986 September 1986 15-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Plans and specifications for a flood control project at Kirbyville, Texas, were completed at a fiscal year cost of $61,095. An initial appraisal report on the feasibility of flood control work at Liggett Light Channel, Rockport, Texas, was initiated and completed at a fiscal year cost of $7,420. Study has been terminated. An initial appraisal report was completed and reconnaissance studies were initiated on the feasibility of providing flood damage reduction measures at Taylor Lake Village, Texas. Fiscal year cost was $14,156. Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress: Appraisal reports on the feasibility of bank stabilization measures at Palacios, Texas, and at Collegeport, Texas, were completed at fiscal year cost of $7,450 and $7,400, respectively. Both studies have been terminated. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Costs were $150,313 for disaster preparedness and $7,286 for emergency operations. Rehabilitation work for Brays and White Oak Bayous Floodways cost $49,336. General Investigations 25. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $2,306,875 of which $267,928 was for navigation studies, $1,948,740 was for flood damage prevention studies, $12,719 was for shoreline protection studies, $6,012 was for coordination with other agencies, $26,235 was for Special Investigations, $167 was for Deauthorization review, and $45,074 was for Planning Assistance to States. 26. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Sims Bayou at Houston, Texas-The project will provide for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide flood protection, environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development consisting of hike-and-bike trails connecting public parks, as well as picnic and other day-use facilities. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,970,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were feet deep and 600 feet wide over its 6.7 mile length and enlargement of Galveston Harbor Channel to 50-52 feet deep and 800 feet wide over the 10.5 mile length. The Galveston Entrance Channel would be extended 12.5 miles to the 52-foot bottom in the Gulf of Mexico. A 50-year dredged material disposal plan will be provided by a combination of containment of dredged material on Snake Island, establishment of 600 acres of wetland, enlargment of Texas City Dike, and deposition of dredged material in the Gulf. Ninety acres of water-oriented recreational facilities on the Texas City Dike are included as a part of the proposed project. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,570,000. Planning and engineering studies were intitiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were $266,519. Upper White Oak Bayou and Tributaries, vicinity of Houston, Texas - The project will provide for channel improvements on White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.5, for a total of 18.6 miles. Project also provides for flood plain zoning and regulation on the residual 100-year flood plains on White Oak Bayou from Mile 19.9 to near Mile 25.5; on Cole Creek form Mile 4.9 to near Mile 6.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 4.5 to near Mile 6.5; and includes recreational development along White Oak Bayou from near Mile 14.6 to near Mile 18.3. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,700,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in 1982. Fiscal year costs were $317,258. 27. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $35,394 and $121,533, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $8,380. $300,776. Texas City Channel, Texas (50-foot Project)-The project will provide for enlargement of Texas City Channel to 50 15-12 TABLE 15-A GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 19861 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston Dist.) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major rehab: Approp. Cost Minor rehab: Approp. Cost 140,000 180,000 261,000 350,000 95,390 130,816 209,089 423,289 1,948,1001 1,872,7181 - 11,857,5022 - 11,857,5022 4,593,000 448,100 2,961,443 2,091,003 90,000 862,876 35,714,3613 85,612 807,209 35,653,8533 - 2,170,080 - 2,170,080 - 133,9254 - 133,9254 45,000 (-)3,700 40,531 535 40,000 260 8,879 48,946 1,120,901 s 1,120,900 s 3,500,000 3,100,000 2,980,000 5,186,000 58,638,3596 2,081,707 4,943,296 3,024,206 4,433,754 57,586,6046 3,306,300 5,514,200 3,242,650 3,958,900 83,234,7787 1,972,610 6,826,376 3,087,727 4,158,250 83,232,330' - 3,576,684 - 3,576,684 400,000 1,300,000 250,000 682 1,397,580 395,274 100,000 (-)25,000 8,628 29,224 115,000 63,743 200,000 63,401 55,000 143,688 3,642,088 3,330,847 3,012,1528 3,003,0588 4,243,200 1,891,650 5,752,000 790,100 42,239,2159 3,742,067 2,061,605 6,079,286 801,255 42,236,4589 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 8,935 - - - - 29,096,39210 - - - - 29,096,39210 381,000 12,061,900 2,149,920 2,151,100 75,811,92311 105,968 12,337,285 2,129,284 2,168,744 75,802,84411 - - - - 7,969,329 - - - - 7,969,329 600,000 114,177 17,523,000 16,141,134 2,300,000 2,218,220 9,878,800 13,015,122 6,920,000 7,515,223 9,888,525 10,452,810 1,445,000 1,407,010 14,157,400 13,885,258 61,253,30312 61,140,51612 195,404,15513 194,804,33813 - 434,638 - 434,638 - 835,873 - 835,873 15-13 TABLE 15-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 9. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX 17. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 18. Clear Creek, TX Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 19861 6,640,880 8,161,017 2,745,800 3,055,463 13,419,700 14,438,456 6,945,000 5,090,215 1,677,000 1,360,493 4,560,200 3,267,663 3,912,500 4,302,086 434,000 438,273 6,028,900 6,216,929 1,353,000 1,554,590 70,000 312,119 444,000 358,725 0 123,491 475,000 111,499 7,398 167,072 1,038,000 1,358,579 98,4 1,452,7 1,442,5 1,471,0 623,5 350,0 331,1 3,303,1 3,269,1 3,110,5 3,056,5 4,859,5 4,930,7 1,955,9 1,963,4 196,C 182,7 1,930,8 2,001,2 (-)120,C 264,5 (-)60,0 280,0 - 35,760,38214 - 35,760,38214 100 98,175,62315 155 98,110,09815 - 18,058,77716 - 18,058,77716 45 36,469,588 503 36,408,034 - 56,136,81517 - 56,136,81517 500 129,900,52018 766 129,869,74618 - 13,325,47219 - 13,325,47219 )00 21,208,26120 X70 21,208,19220 - 726,158 - 726,158 )00 29,105,67621 708 29,041,28021 300 9,776,60322 X02 9,756,67622 )00 2,030,641 506 1,996,409 )00 2,038,345 )45 1,999,957 - 201,300 58 201,300 - 57,206,32423 - 57,206,32423 - 377,804 00 283,833 T00 17,238,813 566 17,172,920 - 12,475,000 - 12,475,000 }00 1,471,000 44 623,544 )00 3,201,361 .39 3,158,801 7,733- - 583,700 25,864 393,238 300,0 156,2 165,0 138,4 5 201,300 24,712 250,204 4,160 1,702,000 1,566,899 (-)91 260,000 177,349 - - - - )00 640,000 32 564,548 00 399,500 96 430,108 - 595,000 5 53,377 5n nnn u,VVV 53,377 169,132 2,953 1,924,600 1,966,162 127 152,000 226,687 21,157 58,330 15-14 TABLE 15-A GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 198617 19. Port Arthur and New Work: Vicinity, TX Hurricane Approp. - (-)276,000 - - 59,702,509 Flood Protection Cost (-)8,648 151,068 10,902 (-)2,599 59,682,040 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 230,000 - - - 16,291,97524 Cost 130,069 64,957 2,293 1,517 16,237,64424 20. Taylors Bayou, TX New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 1,900,000 2,650,000 3,550,000 3,594,000 14,537,198 Cost 2,574,097 1,943,612 3,933,121 3,749,224 14,260,180 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 600,000 500,000 1,099,000 1,200,000 3,799,000 Cost 614,494 425,850 1,284,523 1,138,507 3,519,246 21. Texas City and New Work: Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Approp. 2,870,000 - 122,000 300,000 37,982,400 Flood Protection Cost 1,419,324 1,558,750 941,301 639,007 37,810,304 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 700,000 900,000 200,000 175,000 14,210,10025 Cost 608,280 669,567 446,234 354,683 14,081,81925 22. Vince and Little Vince New Work: Bayous, TX Approp. 1,500,000 1,300,000 2,340,000 3,145,000 15,153,100 Cost 420,002 2,499,132 1,953,848 3,203,495 14,764,653 1 Excludes $376,841 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $1,806,619 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. 3 In addition, $14,692 expended from contributed funds. 4 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. s Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. ? Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $445,269 expended from contributed funds. 8 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $758,303 expended from contributed funds. 9 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. o1I0n cludes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 11 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,098,600 expended from contributed funds. 12 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($2,375,041). 13 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition, $22,672 expended from contributed funds. 14 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 15 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $363,360 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. 16 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 17 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 18 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $2,636,582 expended from contributed funds. 19 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 20 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 21 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. in addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 22 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 23 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 24 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 25 Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 26 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 15-15 TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. 2. Oct. 27,1965 Ju. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1919 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4,19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep. Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom wideth. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. 15-16 H.Doc. 251,89th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Specified in Act. Specified in Acts. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. 4. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 19545 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gult to western end of basin dredged by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gult to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Canal to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Congr., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-17 TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deepdraft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confied to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 15-18 5. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) (Nov. 18, 1971 (Sen. Res.) Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street. 8 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St. and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.10 Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Glaveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Construct extension of Galveston Seawall from 61st Street, southwesterly 16,300 feet along gulf shore. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 42 feet from gulf to point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty and 40 feet thence to Bolivar Roads. Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER12 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. 15-19 TABLE 15-B H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 173, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 7. TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See Public Law 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 15-20 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri- Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.18 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.1 9 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 15-21 TABLE 15-B TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.21 MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-22 10. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation Channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine- Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 158, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 15-23 TABLE 15-B TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Sen. Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS?' Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd. Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 15-24 11. 12. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Sen. Res.) Jul. 24, 1946 (As amended) Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. ARROYO COLORADO, RIO HONDO, TX Bank protection of 400 feet of east bank of Arroyo Colorado downstream of Farm-to-Market Road 106. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo Bayou, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.30 PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 28 TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge.29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st. Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 14, PL 79-526 H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 15-25 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 1 Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4 Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. 6 West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. ' Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. 8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 10 Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251 11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles is inactive. 15 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 or PL93-251. 15-26 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou is inactive. 18 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19 Hill Street Bridge tG mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin authorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL93-251. 27 Jetty extension inactive. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 15-C For Last Cost To September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,2521 - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 3 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,9894 223,010 Cedar Bayou, TX7 1984 681,2635 2,089,3166 Double Bayou, TX 1983 226,558 1,121,9788 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX9 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou, LA10 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX" 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - - 1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. 7 Mile 3 to Mile 11 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was 8 In addition, $5,366 expended from contributed funds. deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 In inactive category for maintenance. 3 Inactive. 10 Channel adequate for existing commerce. 4 Includes $123,676 for previous projects. 11 Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX., con- 6 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition, $25,000 structed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act expended from contributed funds. (H.D. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under Department of 6 Includes $69,784 for previous projects. Army permit. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 15-D For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Baytown, Texas1 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane- Flood Protection2 1984 29,285,0423 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas1 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas1 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5 6 5,835,927 - 1 Inactive. 2 Completed. In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 5 See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 15-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 TABLE 15-E See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 4. Freeport Harbor, TX 5. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 6. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 7. Houston Ship Channel, TX 9. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 10. Texas City Channel, Tx 11. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project $ 8,333,087 2,848,560 1,683,258 12,864,905 55,889,783 324,287 3,331,615 59,545,685 1,716,695 276,720 61,539,100 2,739,385 116,575 758,303 3,614,263 360,249 3,974,512 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 59,967,330 466,477 3,477,525 63,911,332 395,000 139,776 64,446,108 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 12,822,353 136,296 1,023,819 13,982,468 27,074,974 66,000 27,140,974 $ 35,653,853 14,692 35,668,545 83,169,878 445,269 83,615,147 83,615,147 42,236,458 -_ 229,311 42,465,769 42,465,769 75,191,435 512,163 13,121 2,098,600 77,815,319 193,277,774 22,672 193,300,446 193,300,446 96,896,956 163,360 97,060,316 127,490,069 2,636,582 130,126,651 130,126,651 21,013,109 21,013,109 9,213,014 9,213,014 $ 2,17 2,17 3,57 3,57 3,57 0,080 $ 46,157,020 - 2,848,560 - 1,697,950 70,080 50,703,530 76,684 142,636,345 - 324,287 - 3,776,884 76,684 146,737,516 - 1,716,695 - 276,720 76,684 148,730,931 8,935 44,984,778 - 116,575 - 987,614 8,935 46,088,967 - 360,249 8,935 46,449,216 7,373,356 94,484,978 595,973 9,862,345 - 13,121 - 5,747,532 7,969,329 110,107,976 1,270,511 254,515,615 - 466,477 - 3,500,197 1,270,511 258,482,289 - 395,000 - 139,776 1,270,511 259,017,065 - 125,939,249 - 2,612,932 - 1,546,120 - 130,098,301 - 177,082,400 - 1,363,652 - 4,740,017 183,186,069 726,158 726,158 32,000 116,760 183,334,829 34,561,620 136,296 1,023,819 35,721,735 36,287,988 66,000 36,353,988 15-28 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, Tx 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel TABLE 15-F 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 36 42 42 40 36 40 300 200 200 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200 s 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 150 400 400 750' 400 1,000' 375 1,200' 200 500 200 7504 800 800 800 2,8751 800 38-36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 300 200 200 200 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0505 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 2.5 2.1 9.6 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,470 .03 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 - 0.1 200 - 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 0.6 1,690 0.3 3.1 1,000 0.2 1.8 1,000 0.2 5.6 800 0.1 1,250 0.2 - 0.8 400 0.1 - 0.8 - 3.0 - 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 15-29 TABLE 15-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (cont'd) Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. 8. Houston Ship Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Channel, TX Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 9. Matagorda Ship Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel, TX Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff 10. Sabine-Neches Sabine Bank Channel Waterway, TX Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West Turning Basin and Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 40 1,125 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 200-250 150-1,000 400 9004 400 1,0004 1,0004 1,0004 350 400 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,0709 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 200-250 90-1,233 400 9004 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 15-30 3.9 - 26.2 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 1.5 1,000 0.2 - 1.9 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 0.2 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 3,000 3.4 4.1 - 5.6 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 - 0.6 3,470 0.7 - 11.2 - 8 - 18.3 700 8 930 8 1,530 8 1,265 0.2 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Sabine-Neches Maneuvering Area at Waterway, Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 TX (cont) Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1 Average. 2 Includes 100-foot channel width. 3 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4 Diameter. 5 Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. ' Deauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. 9 Includes 300-foot channel width. 15-31 TABLE 15-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Tributary Channel Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via east Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout from Channel to Victoria Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to PT. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout 12 12 12 12 99 9 999 15-12 12 8 12 12 12 12 9 6 999 9 9 9 99 99 14 14 14 14 10 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(avg) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 2,200 500 635 1,130 800(avg) 230 12 12 12 12 9 999 12 12 12 12 999 99 9 9 14 14 14 14 2613 2613 2613 26's 14 12 12 14 12 12 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(avg) 100 100 200 100 200 342(avg) 125-175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 - - 1,225 2,212 1,800 300 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 34.8 0.1 0.8 2.0 0.5 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 7.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.6 15-32 TABLE 15-G GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Authorized Improved Project Dimensions Project Dimensions Depth Depth (Feet Below Bottom (Feet Below Bottom Mean Width Mean Width Length Tributary Channel Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Miles Feet Channel from PT. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW Turning Basin near Rio Hondo North Turnout from Main Channel Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel Main Channel South Leg Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel Harbor Channel Boat Basin 14 14 14 14 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 766 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 125 400 200 125 233-60 125 75 50 Variable 14 14 14 14 8 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 766 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12511 400 200 125-90 233-60 125 75 50 72-501 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 25.812 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.2 1,250 580 860 1,450 500 1,308 - 1,308 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 is in inactive category. 6 Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) ' Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 10 Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 1 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 is in inactive category. 15-33 TABLE 15-H REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 DREDGING OPERATIONS See Section in Text Project Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging jetty channel April 4 to September 30 1986 333,692 $329,869 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX (Maintenance) Dredging channel to Port Bolivar October 1 to November 22, 1985 79,518 $48,911 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (New Work) Dredging Beacon 82 thru Chemical Turning Basin October 1, 1985 to April 22, 1986 3,524,482 $3,153,217 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) July 8 to August 2, 1986 1,340,540 $2,695,000 Dredging Channel to La Quinta and Basin and Jewel Fulton Canal and Basin October 1 to October 14, 1985 1,357,371 $565,021 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Outer Bar and Jetty Channels July 13 to August 18, 1986 925,709 $568,425 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel May 18 to July 31, 1986 2,212,568 $1,226,912 Dredging Bolivar Roads to Ferry Landing September 8 to September 30, 1986 591,105 $479,470 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Maintenance) Dredging High Island to Port Bolivar October 1 to November 22, 1985 83,179 $188,390 Dredging Main Channel near Caney Creek December 13, 1985 to March 6, 1986 117,776 $127,298 Dredging Port Mansfield to Mud Flats, Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel February 5 to May 15, 1986 2,066,946 $1,011,457 Dredging Cedar Lakes to Colorado River February 26 to September 13, 1986 2,162,700 $2,488,959 Dredging Channel to Port Mansfield April 4 to May 14, 1986 104,196 $120,596 Dredging Channel to Victoria and Channel to Seadrift April 5 to September 39, 1986 1,070,640 $574,469 Dredging Matagorda Bay to San Antonio Bay May 18 to September 30, 1986 458,135 $893,995 Dredging Texas City Junction to Galveston Causeway August 18 to September 30, 1986 270,147 $500,000 Dredging Turnstake Island to Live Oak Point May 14 to September 11, 1986 2,259,725 $1,083,274 Dredging Channel to Palacios June 23 to September 15, 1986 2,070,128 $675,337 Dredging Freeport Harbor to Cedar Lakes and San Bernard River Channel July 20 to September 30, 1986 212,333 $500,000 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay January 6 to September 30, 1986 104,335 $155,302 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Carpenters Bayou to Greens Bayou May 14 to September 15, 1986 607,330 $1,617,830 Dredging Red Fish Reef to Morgan Point and 5-Mile Cut September 3 to September 30, 1986 187,500 $200,000 15-34 -- GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 15-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort January 6 to September 30, 1986 6,363,703 $2,837,860 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Port Arthur Turning Basin and Junction Area, Port Arthur and Sabine Neches Canals October 1 to November 6, 1986 1,225,178 622,781 Dredging channel around Harbor Island October 8 to November 21, 1985 214,000 $335,460 Dredging Sabine Neches Canal and Lower Reach Neches River Channel January 15 to June 12, 1986 2,884,479 $1,447,595 Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar and Sabine Bank Channel May 12 to July 13, 1986 5,626,837 $1,685,485 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Anahuac Channel and Channel to Liberty October 1, 1985, to September 30, 1986 808,500 $1,663,220 15-35 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Trinity River Project, TX ............... Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX ...................... 3. Bardwell Lake, TX ..................... 4. Belton Lake, TX ....................... 5. Benbrook Lake, TX .................... 6. Big Sandy Lake, TX .................. 7. Boggy Creek, TX ..................... 8. Canyon Lake, TX ...................... 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......... 10. Elm Fork Floodway, TX ............... 11. Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX 12. Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill) ............. 13. Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road) ......... 14. Grapevine Lake, TX ................... 15. Hords Creek Lake, TX .................. 16. Joe Pool Lake, TX .................... 17. Lavon Lake, TX ....................... 18. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fort Channel Improvement, TX .............. 19. Lewisville Dam, TX .................... 20. Millican Lake, TX .................... 21. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ................ 22. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX .......... 23. Proctor Lake, TX ...................... 24. Ray Roberts Lake, TX ................. 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ... 26. San Gabriel River, TX .................. 27. Somerville Lake, TX ................... 28. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............. 29. Waco Lake, TX ....................... Page Flood Control (cont) Page 16-2 30. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ....... .16-11 31. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 16-12 16-2 32. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 16-3 Operations ........................... 16-12 16-3 33. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ... 16-12 16-3 34. Flood Control Work Under Special 16-3 Authorization ........................ 16-12 16-4 16-4 16-4 16-5 16-5 16-6 16-6 16-6 16-7 16-7 16-8 16-8 16-8 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-10 16-10 16-11 16-11 16-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. Belton Lake Modification, TX ........... 36. Dam "A" Lake, TX .................... 37. Rockland Lake, TX .................... 38. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ..... 39. Town Bluff Dam-B .A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 40. Town Bluff Hydropower, TX ............ 41. Whitney Lake, TX .................... 16-12 16-12 16-13 16-13 16-13 16-13 16-13 Tables Table 16-A Table 16-B Table 16-C Table 16-D Table 16-E Cost and Financial Statement .... Authorizing Legislation ......... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........... 16-15 16-19 16-22 16-22 16-23 16-1 General Investigations 42. Surveys ............................. 16-14 43. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... .16-14 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,219,400,000 including $98,400,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1986, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to RM 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to RM 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $140,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $35,400,000 for a total estimated cost of $175,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $252,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acrefeet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated Federal cost is $68,000,000 and estimated non- Federal cost is $63,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $131,000,000 for the improvement (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,878,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. 16-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $72,395 toward principal and $8,314 to operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Aquilla project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $561,000. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $349,490 toward principal and $482,965 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $9,100,800. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,089,141 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,018,266 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $152,435 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $114,857,800. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $115,585 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $101,079 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $16,640 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 are estimated at $50,510,300. 6. BIG SANDY LAKE, TX Location. The project is located on Big Sandy Creek, a tributary of the Sabine River, and is virtually contained in Wood County, with a small area extending into Upshur County. The damsite is located at River Mile 15.3 about 6.0 miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. Existing project. The project provides for construction 16-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 of an earth and rock fill dam with a maximum height of 94.5 feet above streambed and a total length of 6,200 feet, including the concrete spillway. Big Sandy Lake would have a total controlled storage of 418,200 acre-feet and a water surface area of 16,580 acres at elevation 382.0, top of flood control pool. At elevation 367.5, top of conservation pool, the lake would have an area of 10,810 acres and a storage capacity of 221,200 acre-feet. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611) and is a unit in the comprehensive basin-wide plan of water resource development. Estimated cost of project is $99,100,000. Local cooperation. Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. The Sabine River Authority of Texas and the Texas Water Development Board are the local project sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. March 25, 1982, Phase I General Design Memorandum was recommended for termination due to lack of present Federal interest in the project. Project was recommended to be reclassified to inactive status December 29, 1982, based on the infeasibility of the project. 7. BOGGY CREEK, AUSTIN, TX Location. The project is located on Boggy Creek in southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas. Existing project. The recommended plan consists of concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition into the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. New bridges would be required at four street crossings and two railroad crossings. The plan calls for acquisition of 54 acres of land adjacent to the lower end of the channel to mitigate habitat losses and also to provide for environmental quality enhancement. About 2.25 miles of trails along the channel and 0.95 miles in the Environmental Quality/mitigation area will also be provided. Estimated Federal cost is $15,000,000 and $10,200,000 non-Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1986, base price). The proposed flood control channel will provide capacities for the 100 year flood. Design will provide for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel will vary from 60 feet to 90 feet, and top widths from 80 feet to 120 feet. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the City of Austin is required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas, presently estimated at $4,572,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project presently estimated at $3,906,000; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $323,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $37,000 annually; pay five percent of cost allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $1,206,000; and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $39,000 annually; pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to environmental quality enhancement, presently estimated at $56,000; pay 39 percent of the separable first cost allocated to fish and wildlife mitigation, presently estimated at $126,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $4,000; and pay 39 percent of the cultural resource preservation, currently estimated at $11,000. The city will also be required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all works after completion, prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project, provide and maintain adequate lateral drains and channels, publicize flood plain information for all streams in the watershed and adopt and enforce regulations to minimize damages to future developments within the 100-year flood plain, and administer and assure access to the recreational facilities and lands to all on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. A reevaluation of the Interim Survey Report was submitted May 5,1982, and approved May 18, 1982. The Phase II General Design Memorandum was submitted in January 1984. Specific authorization for construction of Boggy Creek is found in FY 1985 Supplemental Act. The Phase I contract is scheduled to be awarded in April 1987. 8. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the Water Storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $1,225,860 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $891,891 has been paid. 16-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $54,610,200. 9. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 45 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 55 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 98 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 0.9 mile of levee, and the acquisition of 25,500 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1986 base price) is $134,227,000, non- Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $53,357,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Lake, local interest must furnish lands and rights-of-way and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rights-of-way for the first two phases of work on the levees and channel downstream from Cooper Dam. Rights-of-way acquisition for the second phase was also essentially complete when construction was halted. Assuring agencies are the following counties in Texas: Delta, Hunt, Franklin, Lamar, Morris, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have not been received from Delta, Lamar, Morris, or Hunt Counties. Operations during fiscal year. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. Since that time, several briefs have been filed with the New Orleans Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Current action centers on the Appeal and resolution of the litigation. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. Contracts awarded during FY 1986 include the following: Relocate Tucker Cemetery, awarded September 16, 1986; Boundary Delineation Part I, awarded September 30, 1986; Embankment Clearing, awarded June 10, 1986; and North Access Road, awarded September 26, 1986. Through FY 1986 the following is approximately complete: Levees and Channels, 98 percent; Real Estate, 55 percent; Embankments, Spillway and Outlets, 0 percent. 16-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 10. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Location. The project is located in Dallas and Denton Counties, Texas. A portion of the improvement will be in and adjacent to the Cities of Dallas, Irving and Farmers Branch, Texas. Existing project. Improvement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth to Lewisville Dam and along Denton Creek, a tributary of the Elm Fork to Grapevine Dam. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of about 22 miles of the Elm Fork, enlargement and realignment of about 20 miles of tributary channels, construction of about 39 miles of new levee, rehabilitation of about 2 miles of existing levees, modification of 14 street and highway bridges, 4 railroad bridges and alteration of utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $60,700,000, and non-Federal estimated cost is $88,600,000, a total of $149,300,000 (Oct 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the Federal Government, except for the main channel thereof, all lands, easements, utilities and bridge relocations except railroad bridges, necessary for construction and operation of the project. Assurances were signed March 20, 1969 by the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, that they would provide items required of local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was suspended in 1973. Further studies have been delayed until a definite plan has been accepted by local interests. 11. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,100 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed in June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $6,139,000. 12. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, SANITARY LANDFILL Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River, Texas, approximately 19,500 feet upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent and north of the city of Grand Prairie sanitary landfill which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1985. Construction was started September 1983 and completed in 1985. The total Federal and non-Federal cost of the project is $595,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city is required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and with the requirements of Section 221, Public Law 91-611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. 13. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, STREAMBANK EROSION AT MEYERS ROAD Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River approximately 6.1 miles upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent to Meyers Road which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. More specifically Meyers Road is north of Interstate Highway 30 and west of the city's sanitary landfill. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1985. Construction was started in January 1984 and completed in 1985. The total Federal and non-Federal estimated cost of the project is $300,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for 16-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city is required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and with the requirements of Section 221, Public Law 91-611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. 14. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $60,771 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $102,939, Dallas $482,169, and Grapevine $95,157. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and continues. The proposed plan of improvement provides for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment and completion in FY 1987. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $879,242,900. 15. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $937,200. 16. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 24,200 feet, including 50-foot uncontrolled ogee type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $195,900,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) including $10,300,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation 16-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $46,636,000 for water supply and $9,512,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $56,148,000 exclusive of interest. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1986 is approximately 83 percent complete overall. Contracts awarded during FY 1986 include the following: Revegetation Part 2, awarded September 30, 1986; Boundary Delineation Part 3, awarded September 23, 1986; and Drainage Below Dam, awarded September 11, 1986. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continue. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $642,700. 17. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date the district has paid $647,778. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the district has paid $539,505. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $88,119,000. 18. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. Reservoir modification provides for raising top of existing dam from elevation 502.0 to 514.0 and lengthening existing dam from about 9,499 feet to about 19,493 feet; modification of existing concrete spillway structure; enlargement of existing reservoir area, involving acquisition of additional rights-of-way; relocation and alteration of highways, county roads, railroads and utilities; and provision of recreational facilities. East Fork Channel and floodway improvements consist of 25 miles of channel enlargement and straightening of the East Fork between River Mile 0.0 and 31.8; replacement of inadequate levee-sluice structures; rehabilitation of existing levees; acquisition and clearing of land areas as required for rights-of-way along improved channel and existing levees; alteration of existing railroad, highway and county road bridges crossing the improved channel as well as relocation of existing utility lines; and strengthening and raising about 202,400 linear feet of levees of seven existing levee districts. Reservoir will provide a total storage capacity of 748,200 acre-feet (275,600 are for flood control, 380,000 for water supply storage, and 92,600 for sedimentation reserve). Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $220,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $69,970,000. Construction was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $2,534,663 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,606,249. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for Levee Improvement, Increment I, East Fork was awarded May 1, 1981, and continues. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 99 percent complete. 19. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. 1 F-R FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Tob date Dallas has paid $3,000,210 and Denton $128,132. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $879,242,900. 20. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on the Navasota River at mile 24.1, approximately 7.0 miles north of Navasota, Texas in Grimes and Brazos Counties, Texas. This project would be the first of a two-stage development consisting of Millican and Navasota Dams, both of which would be units in the overall plan of improvement for the Brazos River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides for construction of a concrete and earthfill dam 25,300 feet long including a 472-foot gate-controlled spillway, rising 83 feet above the streambed. Without Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control pool (elevation 234.0) would provide 1,557,400 acre-feet of storage space and cover a surface area of 66,000 acres. There would be 784,800 acre-feet of flood control; 680,200 acre-feet for water supply (surface area 42,400 acres), and 92,400 acre-feet for sediment reserve. With Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control elevation and total storage would remain the same. The flood control pool would be 359,600 acre-feet, water supply storage would be 1,125,800 acre-feet (surface area 55,500 acres) and sediment reserve would be 72,000 acrefeet. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $318,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1982 base price). Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 applies. By letter dated December 9, 1974, the Brazos River Authority stated that they would be the state agency to cost share for both water supply and recreation. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued, and the General Reevaluation Report is scheduled to complete in September 1987. 21. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000, including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $677,186 for water supply and $741,523 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $27,356,600. 22. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,324 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional consideration of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $2,375,600. 23. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improve 16-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 ment and authoriation act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $312,467 for water supply and $296,192 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $6,783,600. 24. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet. with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $302,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8024, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 53 percent complete overall. Acquisition of real estate continues. FY 1986 funds were used to award the following contracts: County Roads, Part III, awarded April 21, 1986; Mt. Spring Water Lines, awarded August 12, 1986; Valley View Telephone, awarded July 21, 1986; Texas-New Mexico Electric Lines, awarded September 25, 1986; Cooke County Electric Lines, awarded July 29, 1986; Green Springs Waterlines, awarded September 29, 1986; General Telephone Lines and FM 922, awarded October 7, 1985; Bolivar Water Supply, awarded September 25, 1986; and Denton County Electric-FM 423, awarded September 5, 1986. At the request of the City of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. Engineering and design continue. 25. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. Provides for clearing, widening, deepening, and straightening about 34.9 miles of river and creek channels to carry standard project flood discharges, construction of channel walls, paving, conduit, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $121,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $73,600,000 which includes $3,000,000 cash contributions and $70,600,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $194,600,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 81 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $999,525 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio channel. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1986 were $105,305,500. 26. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel 16-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price),and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acrefeet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acrefeet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. This reaffirmation is currently scheduled for submission in October 1986 and to be fully coordinated by February 1987. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $15,535,700. 27. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, to date, $905,754 has been paid. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $31,126,500. 28. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $1,135,440. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $554,928. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1986 is $22,809,300. 29. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County. Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including 16-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,527,686. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $716,619 and the City has paid $114,295. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $58,731,900. 30. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date the City has paid $357,087. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $13,697,000. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with section 208.10, of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 16-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $33,549. Total costs to September 30, 1986 were $599,200. 32. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944 expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1986 were $183,482,600 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1986 were $417,500. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $183,900,600. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 16-C.) 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 16-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $422,218 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. 16-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Belton Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The modification of Belton Lake to provide installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954. The plan of improvement provides for reallocation of the gross storage capacity in Belton Lake to provide a power pool and the installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities. Operations during fiscal year. The modification is classified as deferred until the Chief of Engineers determines it is advisable. 36. DAM A LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 18 miles west of Jasper and about 4 miles west of Horger,'IT exas. Existing project. The project is designed to be used as a run-of-river plant for the generation of power and to reregulate power surges from the proposed Rockland Lake. The last estimate of project cost was $3,220,000 in 1954. For last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Operations during fiscal year. The project is classified as deferred. 37. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 3 miles west of Rockland, Texas, on the Neches River. Existing project. The project would control floods, generate hydroelectric power, and provide water supply for various uses. The last estimate of project cost was $767,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1985 base price), including $145,900,000 Federal cost and $621,100,000 non-Federal cost. For the last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Operations during fiscal year. The project was reclassified to active status December 2, 1982. 38. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $3,800,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $105,511. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $109,061. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $82,015,400. 39. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 40. TOWN BLUFF HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 and a Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 indicated that installing hydropower at this project is now economically feasible. The hydropower facilities will include a 6,000 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,000 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment to be located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel and will be operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The installation and operation of hydropower facilities will not result in the altering of the existing operation at Town Bluff. The project will produce an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by Non-Federal funds. The estimated Non-Federal cost is $16,200,000. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. 16-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operation during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed and construction on the turbinegenerator was initiated in FY 1986. Planning and Engineering studies continue. Project completion date is scheduled for 1989. 41. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for Water Supply Storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date the authority has paid $123,507. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated flood damages prevented throuth FY 1986 were $131,516,200. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $887,601 for flood damage prevention studies, $107,085 for coordination with other agencies, and $3,739 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,086,558. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $300,266. Fiscal year costs were $5,918 for hydrologic studies. 16-14 TABLE 16-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Big Sandy Lake, TX 7. Boggy Creek, TX 8. Canyon Lake, TX 9. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX 10. Elm Fork Floodway, TX 11. Ferrells Bridge Dam - Lake O' The Pines, TX 12. Grand Prarie, TX Landfill (Contributed Funds) 13. Grand Prairie, TX Myers Road Total Cost To FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 17 248,000 212,999 (-)20,000 (-)81,000 22,299,865 94,078 216,206 53,412 161,064 22,299,812 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 3,049,000 5,261,404 136,000 75,109 1,064,700 673,632 20,904 55,035 1,169,000 1,039,194 13,647 1,807,500 1,489,685 1,000 1,792 350,000 373,933 1,162,600 713,806 1,000,000 95,448 2,973,684 1,995,078 250,000 25,826 345,000 38,400 12,603 - 58,974 329,000 327,291 1, 1, 790,000 789,322 3,162 ,278,600 ,308,974 325,069 249,000 287,859 561,200 972,137 57,000 63,661 1,236,000 1,533,021 (-)5,160 2,457 2,357,000 2,098,363 100,000 79,858 635,000 1,065,277 175,000 319,458 1,458,080 2,502,913 5,000 13,559 1,113,000 1,122,862 792,000 1,901,072 1,424,500 1,425,959 218,800 (-)24,666 311,164 211,600 234,587 1,247 858 - 45,506,300 7,683 45,491,467 412,000 1,126,000 400,259 1,090,518 - 10,934,505 - 10,934,505 1,124,800 11,364,88718 1,116,537 10,153,63318 (-)9,000 16,960,549 (-)2,557 16,960,5491 1,622,600 15,320,54218 1,640,448 15,142,65018 - 13,130,463 - 13,069,9912 1,112,000 16,228,41418 1,140,186 16,169,38018 - 675,000 - 675,000 295,000 1,020,000 215,950 928,752 - 19,088,5243 - 19,088,524 1,087,000 11,697,00418 1,068,610 11,425,52118 3,301,000 27,921,000 3,181,603 27,541,243 - 662,400 - 662,400 - 14,175,197� - 14,175,197 s 6 1,660,200 19,814,83118 1,697,636 19,780,78218 - 250,000 - 219,960 - 345,000 32,589 345,000 - 250,000 - 248,048 16-15 1,355,200 1,970,936 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project (Contributed Funds) 14. Grapevine Lake, TX 15. Hords Creek Lake, TX 16. Joe Pool Lake, TX 17. Lavon Lake, TX 18. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 19. Lewisville Dam, TX 20. Millican Lake, TX 21. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 22. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 23. Proctor Lake, TX 24. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 37. Rockland Lake, TX FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 8,040 4,200,000 5,371,807 1,758,000 1.743,680 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,552,800 1,515,928 105,939 2,912 122,469 4,274,500 2,043,428 36,993 250,0( 462,3 1,450,6( 1,504,7 - 40,000 1,400,000 5,500,000 333,895 5,165,510 2,034,600 2,024,550 1,323,728 2,730,034 - 20,000 - 18,076 1,140,650 1,370,000 601,409 1,792,382 27,800,000 17,200,000 29,007,040 14,842,702 1,904,6 1,945,3 (-)184,0 3,5 2,054,6 1,876,6 23,0 - 40,000 - 8,040 00 21,317,790 95 21,301,3977 00 18,372,76818 55 18,331,65818 - 2,731,0898 24 2,731,089 81 9,232,66918 94 9,156,31818 00 159,789,000 30 159,277,976 00 108,000 89 159,789 - 12,864,796 - 12,864,796 00 18,615,61818 84 18,554,57018 - 69,796,862 - 69,796,678 00 25,333,988 29 25,333,9889 00 25,351,50310 18 03 22,841,19210 18 - 3,627,000 08 3,627,000 - - 9,846,759 - - 9,846,7591 1,074,300 843,000 10,950,12618 1,095,363 888,742 10,930,16918 - - 16,027,467 - - 16,027,467 1,428,000 601,000 10,454,93118 1,436,960 603,677 10,415,70718 - - 14,469,585 - 14,409 14,469,585 1,083,900 1,081,000 10,954,73218 1,107,198 1,085,535 10,735,20818 41,500,000 44,118,000 197,712,700 40,690,956 46,428,681 195,735,906 - 269,000 269,000 - 251,649 258,650 951,0 1,055,5 15,550,0 14,593,6 (-)23,000 19,791 2,507,319 1,618,813 76,000 709,286 (-)13,663 498,732 2,585,547 1,835,306 232,000 234,715 767 300 1,036,500 648,170 964,776 506,566 23,000 27,335 1,445,300 752,711 37,700,000 37,414,850 (-)14,000 812 1,691,150 2,742,378 220,000 221,839 755,160 1,151,615 2,928,000 3,839,707 70,000 24,566 480 788,400 1,129,622 704,900 1,142,469 821,000 1,522,872 46,000,000 44,353,854 16-16 TABLE 16-A - 1,9' 00 928,1 80 980,1� 00 1,951,0( 36 7,404,0: - 108,0( - 159,7 TABLE 16-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 17 38. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX 25. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 27. Somerville Lake, TX 28. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 39. Town Bluff Dam- B. A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 29. Waco Lake, TX 40. Whitney Lake, TX 30. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (-)1,300 48,471 - 60,670,957 143 - 60,670,95612 2,468,500 3,126,800 2;594,500 2,441,600 32,118,21418 2,250,027 3,844,076 2,739,758 2,455,388 31,746,17518 3,300,000 (-)425,000 808,000 2,114,000 40,215,048 2,631,768 989,645 548,801 2,119,850 39,927,006 71,550 71,550 2,150,000 (-)20,000 2,216,366 72,540 1,278,600 661,833 1,050,436 772,455 709,900 1,357,865 475,000 783,364 - 999,525 - 999,525 200,000 191,000 101,773,100 338,897 181,784 101,759,507 1,211,700 1,208,000 1,222,310 1,202,657 939,000 964,000 960,670 980,679 (-)1,337 110,000 - 4,588 102,184 17,545 2,060,109 2,266,800 1,816,500 1,226,952 3,254,200 1,838,950 (-)1,960 5,721 6,126,75618 6,094,19018 5,059,73218 5,047,79418 - 27,790,438 3,568 27,790,436 1,563,600 17,915,83618 1,586,603 17,380,29518 - 20,522,08413 - 20,510,642 881,500 745,300 844,000 841,000 10,249,22618 794,558 1,037,452 843,990 900,650 10,206,05818 - - - - 6,602,737 -.- - - 6,602,73714 1,059,315 1,011,100 762,000 859,000 11,479,56818 583,762 1,464,428 788,253 848,855 11,364,96618 - - - - 49,521,12115 -- - - 49,521,121 1,926,412 1,825,300 2,087,100 1,838,800 16,786,05818 1,244,780 2,428,338 2,093,703 1,891,769 16,640,33218 (-)18,411 (-)588 - 42,952,938 - 42,952,93816 2,609,300 2,078,000 2,079,900 2,484,600 29,447,88018 1,973,166 2,807,910 2,035,349 2,471,637 29,002,37518 - - - - 35,731,626 - - - - 35,731,626 1,829,000 885,600 1,736,500 1,541,600 20,704,69018 1,479,911 1,379,767 1,744,716 1,534,545 20,641,35618 Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposted to miscellaneous receipts. a Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5 Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 16-17 TABLE 16-A FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7 Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposted to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15iEsx cludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 17Includes funds ($12,991,762) provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 16-F, FY 85 Annual Report. 18 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 16-18 TABLE 16-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. 3. 4. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 3, 1955 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 31, 1960 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 22, 1936 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification (see Sec. 36 of Text) of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BIG SANDY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Big Sandy Creek about six miles northwest of Big Sandy, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Construction of a concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition into the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. DAM "A" LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River about 18 miles west of Jasper, Texas. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Realignment and enlargement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and Denton Creek, and a parallel levee system from the existing Dallas levee system upstream to near the Dallas and Denton county lines. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAND PRAIRIE LANDFILL, TX Construction of a cutoff channel to eliminate an oxbow in the West Fork of the Trinity River. GRAND PRAIRIE, MEYERS RD, TX Slope Restoration with riprap side slopes along streambank of West Fork Trinity River, adjacent to Meyers Road. 16-19 S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 429, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1946 Flood Control Act of 1946 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 36. 10. 11. 12. 13. TABLE 16-B See Date Section Auth in Text Act FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION )rizing Project and Work Authorized 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 18, 1941 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 Sep. 3, 1954 GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Navasota River about seven miles north of Navasota, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River approximately three miles west of Rockland, Texas. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. 16-20 Documents H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 37. 38. 25. 26. 27. TABLE 16-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul 18,1968 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 24, 1946 28. 39. 40. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. TOWN BLUFF HYDROPOWER, TX Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town Bluff Dam. B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort/ Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. 16-21 H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. 29. 41. 30. TABLE 16-C FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 33 of Text) PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Fossil Creek, TX3 1969 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX1 - - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX2 1979 - - Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX4 1983 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX3 1971 - - Greenville, TX3 1983 - - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX4 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX4 - - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX4 - - - Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, TX4 - - - Plainview Local Flood Protection Project, TX4 1979 - - Roanoak Lake, TX' 1979 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX3 1969 - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX3 1983 - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX3 1986 - - ' Deauthorized 1 Nov 81. 2 Inactive. 3 Completed. 4 Recommended for deauthorization, H.R. 3678, August 23, 1983, 98th Congress, 1st Session. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-D (See Section 31 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek Sep. 26, 1986 Dallas Floodway Jul. 31, 1986 East Fork Sep. 4, 1986 Fort Worth Floodway Sep. 11, 1986 Greenville Jan. 23, 1986 Irving Floodway Jul. 28, 1986 Munday Nov. 30, 1983 Pleasanton Mar. 18, 1986 Poteet Aug. 14, 1985 San Antonio Floodway Jun. 24, 1986 Sulphur River Levees Aug. 23, 1985 Wheeler Creek Apr. 16, 1986 Zacate Creek Mar. 19, 1986 16-22 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 16-E (See Section 34 of Text) Project Cost Burton Creek, Bryan, TX California Creek, Hamlin, TX Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX Elm Fork, Gainsville, TX Hickory Creek, Balch Springs, TX Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX Walnut Creek, Sequin, TX Buttercup Creek, Cedar Park Hill, TX Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX Lower Walnut Creek, Austin, TX Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX South Mesquite, Mesquite, TX Walnut Creek Tribs, Austin, TX $ 75,025 11,162 1,254,064 138,648 4,630 181,223 16,699 2,854 7,500 77,078 63,491 39,117 29,913 10,717 42,640 16-23 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises watershed of Canadian River and tributaries and the watershed of Arkansas River and tributaries in Colorado and New Mexico; the watershed of Rio Grande and tributaries including Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and watershed of Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in July 1982 to include all of New Mexico west of the Texas state line and the southwest corner of Colorado west of the Kansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control Page 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM .... 17-1 2. Conchas Lake, NM ...................... 17-2 3. ElPaso, TX .......................... 17-2 4. John Martin Reservoir, CO........... .... 17-3 5. Rio Grande Basin, NM.................. 17-3 5A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ...................... 17-4 5B. Cochiti Lake, NM ..................... 17-4 '5C. Galisteo Dam, NM....................... 17-4 5D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ................. 17-5 5E. Rio Grande Floodway, NM................ 17-5 5F. Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, NM................... 17-5 6. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ........... 17-6 Flood Control 1. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. In an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of tributaries is about 276 square miles. Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of Rio Grande, forms eastern border of watersheds. Crest of mountain range rises more than a mile over river to elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Plans for improvement consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east 7. Trinidad Lake, CO ...................... 17-6 8. Two Rivers Dam, NM .................... 17-7 9. Inspection of completed flood control projects........................ 17-7 10. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations .................... 17-7 11. Other authorized flood control projects........................ 17-8 12. Flood control work under special authorizations.................. 17-8 General Investigations 13. Surveys .................... .... ........ 14. Collection and study of basic data ......... 17-8 17-8 of and parallel to valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For description of complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channels prevented $3,769,400 in flood damages during FY 1986. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $49,997,600. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1986 were North Diversion Channel near Alameda, 6,920 c.f.s. on October 9, 1985, and none were recorded for the South Diversion Channel. *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 17-1- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the north and south diversion channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem is scheduled to initiate in FY 1987 and complete in FY 1988. 2. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. Dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from confluence of Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map. Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1: 125,000). Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. Main section contains conduits in its base for release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. Earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. Reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 529,000 acre-feet (198,900 for flood control, 259,600 for water conservation and irrigation, and 70,500 dead storage). Dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of reservoir continued. Reservoir was operated for storage of floodwaters and releases for irrigation purposes. $162,800 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1986 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1986 were $2,614,600. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1986 were $132,300. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1986 were $8,937,100. Pool elevation at start of FY 1986 was 4,194.44 feet with corresponding storage of 271,496 acrefeet. Total releases for reporting period were 73,885 acrefeet. Releases of 62,436 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,516 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. Pool elevation on September 30, 1986, was 4,196.34 feet with corresponding storage of 287,458 acrefeet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 1,454 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands under project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was approved in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. 3. EL PASO, TX Location. At El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on left bank of Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into Rio Grande. Runoff from tributary arroyos on eastern, southern, and western slopes of adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of city and its outlying suburban developments. Project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1986 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range.and Northgate Dams (May 1986) and Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986). During FY 1986 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal; however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1986 were $22,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has temporarily ended in the Central Area. Remaining projects include the Fillmore-Van Buren Dams System. The Central Area of the project is for all practical purposes 100 percent complete. The Northwest Area is 100 percent complete. The Reconnaissance Report on the Southwest Area was completed in December 1982 and the preparation of the General Design Memorandum is approximately 75 percent complete. 4. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. On Arkansas River 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. A concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. 'Ibtal capacity of reservoir at spillway crest is 615,500 17-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT acre-feet (270,200 for flood control and 345,300 for conservation and recreation storage). Reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for flood control in Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For detail of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of Arkansas River Compact. No flood damages were prevented during FY 1986; however, $136,500 sediment damages were prevented. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1986 were $75,435,800. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1986 were $623,400. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $22,688,600. Maximum pool elevation of 3,850.29 feet with corresponding storage of 337,136 acrefeet occurred on March 4, 1986. Total releases for FY 1986 were 253,812 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 158,631 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 1,219 acre-feet for FY 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. 5. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized flood control phase of comprehensive plan of development of water resources of Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by States of Colorado and Texas, that project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By same act, Congress also authorized for construction irrigation phase of comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with joint agreement approved by Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of unified plan of improvement. Authority for Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation and Table 17-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects in authorized plan are in individual reports on the following pages. 5A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan for Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on Rio Chama near town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-10, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of left abutment. Reservoir provides 565,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,212,000 acre-feet. For detail description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1985, the pool elevation was 6,244.83 feet. The maximum pool (6,246.74 feet) and storage (319,161 acre-feet) occurred on June 27, 1986. On September 30, 1986, the pool elevation was 6,245.38 feet with a corresponding storage of 311,790 acre-feet. There was 2,161 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1986. There were $34,023,300 in flood damages prevented during FY 1986. Sediment damages prevented were $242,000. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $193,293,300 through FY 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 340 on Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. Project extends generally in an east-west line across Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of Rio Grande and then southward across Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on south side of Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in left abutment on Rio Grande. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 492,500 acre-feet for flood control, 103,800 acre-feet for sediment and 45,700 acre-feet for recreation within the sediment space, for a total of 596,300 acre-feet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more im- 17-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 provements details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1985, the pool elevation was 5,387.36 feet with a corresponding storage of 178,540 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,417.32 feet with a storage of 300,997 acre-feet on July 3, 1986. On September 30, 1986, the pool elevation was 5,330.67 feet with a corresponding storage of 51,158 acrefeet. There was 1,756 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1986. There were $50,994,900 in flood damages prevented during FY 1986. Sediment damages prevented were $196,700. Accumulated total damages prevented are $194,507,900. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completion in 1977. The Tetilla Peak Recreation area was re-advertised and awarded in 1980 and completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. Definite project site is about 8 miles upstream of project document site. Reservoir will extend upstream from dam for about 4 miles to near village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map, San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in right abutment. The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1985. No storage occurred during FY 1986. Peak inflow was 119 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 119 c.f.s. There was 44 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1986. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $4,900 totaling $110,800 through FY 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1970. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. In Sandoval County, NM, on Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from confluence of Jemez River and Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 780 feet long with a maximum height of 135 feet above streambed, and offchannel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. Reservoir has a capacity of 106,100 acre-feet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1985, the pool elevation was 5,194.67 feet with a corresponding storage of 26,621 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,203.43 feet with a storage of 39,328 acre-feet on May 13, 1986. On September 30, 1986 the pool elevation was 5,197.92 feet with a corresponding storage of 31,089 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1986. Sediment deposition during FY 1986 was 615 acre-feet. There were $1,325,400 in flood damages prevented during FY 1986. Sediment benefits during FY 1986 were $68,900. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1986 were $9,847,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan of improvement for Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 17-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. Consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect levees. Construction of project is a joint undertaking by Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist through reach of river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by meandering river. (See Table 17-D on existing project and Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221. 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. 17-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT The city of Espanola or Santa Clara Pueblo has not given indication they plan positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $210,000 in flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1986. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1986 amounted to $42,326,800. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 5,190 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on August 11, 1986. The peak at San Acacia was 7,060 c.f.s. on May 14, 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Albuquerque unit and Cochiti to Rio Puerco units of Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit is deferred for restudy. The Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) unit was reclassified to the active category on July 18, 1973, based on a letter of intent to cooperate from the city of Truth or Consequences dated May 31, 1973. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 5F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. Vicinity city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement includes 4 miles of 20-foot-high levees with positive seepage control, an interior drainage system, and 5 miles of diversion channels. The diversion channels would be required for control of floods on tributary arroyos at and in the vicinity of Truth or Consequences. Estimated Federal cost is not available pending project reformulation. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Location cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Letters of intent have been received from the City of Truth or Consequences (dated June 8, 1983) and the County of Sierra (dated June 8, 1983). Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was initiated in FY 1979 and continued during FY 1986. 6. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. Lake is in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Project operation began in November 1979. Authorized plan of improvement consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height abo':e the streambed. Project purposes are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipater. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 447,100 acre-feet which includes 80,100 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,685 acres. Contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Summer Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs will be responsibility of Federal Government; however, Carlsbad Irrigation District will be required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an annual amount equal to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. Carlsbad Irrigation District also has agreed to use Sumner Lake for floodcontrol. Because they will realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks will be required to manage the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 4,743.02 feet with storage of 94,811 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 45,182 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1986 was 4,745.90 feet with a storage of 105,371 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,746.46 feet with a storage of 107,510 acre-feet on June 29, 1986. There was 550 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $65,000. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 32,460 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $113,600 with an accumulative total of $1,009,400 through FY 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. 7. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. On Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with Arkansas River. Project is about 4 miles upstream from city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map. Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long, with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with water surface at top of flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum 17-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 flood. Reservoir provides for storage of 60,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acrefeet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,500 acre-feet. Reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and will be operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1985 the pool elevation was 6,172.87 feet with a corresponding storage of 16,936 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,187.69 feet with a corresponding storage of 26,492 acre-feet on July 29, 1986. On September 30, 1986, the pool elevation was 6,163.06 feet with a corresponding storage of 11,876 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1986 was 450 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1986 was $168,300. Accrued sediment benefits are $1,702,100. Irrigation benefits for FY 1986 were $118,300. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1986 were $1,018,000. Irrigation releases for the year were 30,105 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was awarded in September 1982. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 8. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. About 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM, on Rio Hondo and Rocky Arroyo. Rio Hondo is formed at confluence of Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito, near village of Hondo, NM, in foothills region of Sierra Blanca in southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with Pecos River near Roswell, NM (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 1,000 c.f.s. Capacity of Two Rivers Reservoir at spillway crest is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1985. The maximum pool elevation of 3,986.40 feet with a corresponding storage of 871 acrefeet occurred on 24 June 1986. There were $796,300 in flood damages prevented during 1986. Sediment damages prevented were $104,000. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1986 were $7,519,900. There were 929 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1986. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1986 are $658,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 9. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for the fiscal year were $141,000. An appropriation of $60,000 was provided through the Inspection of Completed Works program in FY 1986 to evaluate the performance of the Albuquerque North Diversion Channel project. 10. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, three projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, and Sumner. Platoro Dam on Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. Authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acrefeet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood-control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by Interior Appropriation Act of 1941 (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of project was completed by Water and Power Resources Service (Bureau of Reclamation) in FY 1952. On October 1, 1985, storage in Platoro reservoir was 53,506 acre-feet, elevation 10,027.5 feet. Maximum storage of 55,353 acre-feet, elevation 10,029.5 feet occurred on June 30, 1986. On September 30, 1986, storage was 52,137 acre-feet, elevation 10,026.0 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,650 c.f.s. on June 7, 1986. $502,000 in flood damages were prevented by the project during FY 1986. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $3,955,700. Total cost for activity during FY 1986 was $12,811. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County Colorado. Pueblo reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1985 was 245,259 acre-feet, elev. 4,876.23 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 17-b ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT 279,938 acre-feet, elev. 4,883.75 feet on February 19,1986. Storage on September 30, 1986 was 251,995 acre-feet, elev. 4,875.64 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1986. Total cost for FY 1986 activity was $11,660. Total flood damages prevented to date are $2,761,900. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1985 was 9,685 acre-feet, elevation 4,237.0 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1986 was 51,702 acre-feet, elevation 4,261.1 feet on September 17, 1986. Storage on September 30, 1986 was 50,571 acre-feet, elevation 4,260.7 feet. Total cost for FY 1986 activity was $8,667. 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 17-E. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1986 were: Kistenmacher Arroyo, Dona Ana County, NM $7,500; Fountain Creek at Shooks Run, Colorado Springs, CO $4,277; Fountain Creek at Southmoor Addition, City of Fountain, CO $5,812; Fountain Creek at Circle Drive, El Paso County, CO $2,727 and San Vicente Arroyo at Silver City, NM $2,454. TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED F Emergency flood control activities repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1986 were $161,624 for advance preparation, and $9,969 for flood emergency operations, and $230,300 for repair and restoration. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs during FY 1986 were: Canipa Creek at Acoma, NM $11,707; Taos County Rd C-61, Vadito, NM $950; Monument Creek Forest View Rd, CO $7,400; Red River at Questa, NM $2,550; Rio Ruidoso in Lincoln County, NM $64,184; San Francisco River at Reserve, NM $24,995; Willow Creek at Creede, CO $7,500; Fountain Creek at Security, Colorado Springs, CO $24,639; Fountain Creek at Pefion Bridge, Pueblo, CO $2,216 and Rio Costilla at Amalia, Taos County, NM $32,345. General Investigations 13. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $620,472 for flood damage prevention studies, $32,359 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $149,899 for preauthorization studies, Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado, Phase I. 14. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $166,000 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $16,000. 'LOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Alamogordo diversion channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico4 Alpine, Texas3 Cibolo Creek, Texas' Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway) Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' Highway 12, Colorado' Holly Colorado' Las Animas, Colorado 2 Las Cruces, New Mexico 2 Pecos, Texas3 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec. 212)1' Pueblo Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 Smith Creek, Colorado' Socorro diversion channel, tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3Inactive. 17-7 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1966 1977 1983 1959 1952 1985 1985 1980 1980 1977 1954 1983 1985 1965 4Deferred. Cost to September 30, 1986 Construction 189,356 130,488 829,500 Operation & Maintenance 2 881,262- 219,789- 120,500- 2,021,400- 4,956,000- 4,752,310- 480,273- 130,678- 201,958- 1,123,900- 219,000- 2,259,328- REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Costs Section to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 1. Albuquerque New Work Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 2. Conchas Lake, NM 3. El Paso, TX 4. John Martin Reservoir, CO 5. Rio Grande Basin, NM 5A. Abiquiu Dam, NM 5B. Cochiti Lake, NM 5C. Galisteo Dam, NM 5D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM 5E. 5F. 6. Rio Grande, Floodway, T. or C. Unit, NM Santa Rosa Dam & Lake, NM 7. Trinidad Lake, CO 8. Two Rivers Dam, NM Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 58,423 2,648 1,364,200 710,414 5,150,000 6,026,141 39,000 3,601 712,500 684,579 134,000 33,519 997,100 771,334 109,900 415,245 1,578,500 1,273,598 10,000 20,565 129,000 123,904 - 20,400 9,731 331,100 320,473 45,000 37,505 108,000 320,612 507,200 395,478 3,592,000 4,122,547 420,000 390,795 -2,000 10,927 31,900 696,200 366,107 4,100,000 4,267,354 70,000 95,377 797,800 875,971 128,771 1,270,600 1,292,150 -9,600 53,404 706,900 1,148,752 5,000 13,177 100,000 106,851 -775 36 193,600 342,025 155,000 164,711 -60,000 138,593 500,000 561,101 60,000 369,297 290,000 311,317 -3,625 1,014 - 2,912 542 805,000 838,774 7,350,000 9,062,333 10,022 1,000,000 1,020,695 -135,000 1,771 2,231,000 2,368,302 154 1,014,000 1,083,745 9,287 124,000 142,277 245,000 269,016 200,000 162,971 49,734 622,000 680,429 384,730 535,000 598,337 - 17,268,450 - 17,268,450 518,356 518,356 854,644 854,644 13,821,4991 13,821,4991 12,566,372 12,480,156 58,017,294 57,789,907 15,555,3582 15,555,3582 14,537,500 14,514,679 941,000 905,216 3,538,060 3,743,565 955,000 976,245 - 26,745,028 14,318 26,745,028 1,958,000 13,274,806 2,032,253 13,177,916 - 97,084,559 - 97,084,559 1,010,000 9,723,700 996,402 9,684,616 - 14,275,053 - 14,275,053 88,000 1,488,477 97,215 1,485,712 1,457,000 5,683,972 1,455,797 5,682,769 198,000 5,323,051 201,545 5,317,267 367,000 5,908,8683.4 276,605 5,781,1903 - 41,041,562 20,833 41,010,819 491,000 3,152,200 489,720 3,111,826 - 55,774,758 20,746 55,751,239 459,000 3,863,500 425,597 3,805,899 - 4,847,244 - 4,847,244 17-8 TABLE 17-A ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 17-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost5 Section to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 Maint. Approp. 158,100 156,700 183,000 209,000 2,167,712 Cost 137,317 198,258 188,678 214,225 2,160,943 'Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs Rio Puerco units and for preconstruction planning of Espanola and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief to Bureau of Reclamation under memorandum agreement Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work per- between that agency and the Corps. formed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works 4 Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through acceleration Act of 1962. GI appropriations. 2 Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. In- 5 Includes funds (3,192,000) provided by Jobs Act (PL 98-8 cludes $30,000 for Code 710. March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 17-F of FY 1985 3 Includes funds for completed Albuquerque and Cochiti to Annual Report. TABLE 17-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents EL PASO, TX 3. Oct. 27, 1965 A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff 1st sess. in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM 5. June 30, 1948 Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general 1st sess. comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. May 17, 1950 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Dept. Public Law 516, 81st of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Cong., 2nd sess. Grande Basin. July 14, 1960 Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM 5. June 30, 1948 Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., and stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 1st sess.' and Public May 17, 1950 (See Table 17D.) Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES (HOT SPRINGS), NM 5. June 30, 1948 Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth in H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood 1st sess. control of Rio Grande Basin. May 17, 1950 In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande 1st sess. Basin, at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. 'Contains latest published maps. 17-9 TABLE 17-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) Drainage Miles Area Total Above Nearest (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfil 325 feet high, 1,212,000 26,797,0963 NM acre-feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 Dam NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 to 394' - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 3401 Cochiti, 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 NM acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 NM acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM: TABLE 17-D EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9E of Text) Location Estimated Reach (river miles)1 Cost Truth or Consequences unit (formerly Hot Springs) 123 to 129 $9,200,000 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit 155 to 226 6,200,000 (1960)2 Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit (not including Albuquerque unit) 236 to 340 2,658,0003 Albuquerque unit 286 to 305 3,130,0004 Espanola Valley unit 366 to 394 456,0002 (1970)s 'River mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 23DIne afedrdreitdio fno,r restudy. $1,650,000 incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation in this reach. 4In addition, $75,000 incurred by local interest in this reach. 5In addition, estimated cost to local interests is $69,000 (1970). TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance2 Alamogordo diversion channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico4 1966 189,356 - Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 - Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500 - Colorado Springs, Fountain qclue Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway) 1959 881,262 - Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789 - Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500 - Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400 - Las Animas, Colorado2 1980 4,956,000 - Las Cruces, New Mexico2 1980 4,752,310 - Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273 - Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec. 212)1 - 130,678 - Pueblo Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)1 1954 201,958 - Santy Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 1983 1,123,900 - Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000 - Socorro diversion channel, tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2,259,328 - 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3Inactive. 4Deferred. 17-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT * This District comprises northern, western, and southwestern portions of Arkansas and a portion of southern Missouri embraced in drainage basins of Arkansas River and tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and below mouth of Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR, drainage basins of the Arkansas portion of Little River and tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, AR, and drainage basins of White River and tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. In addition, Little Rock District has responsibility for planning, design, construction, and operation and maintenance of that portion of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System below Pine Bluff. Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on White River below Newport, AR, and mouth of Wild Goose Bayou. White River downstream from mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS .... 18-2 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification AR .......................... 18-2 3. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR ............................... 18-2 4. Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, AR ...................... 18-3 5. Lock and Dam No. 2, AR .................. 18-3 6. Lock and Dam No. 3, AR ................. 18-3 7. Lock and Dam No. 4, AR ................. 18-3 8. Lock and Dam No. 5, AR ................. 18-3 9. Lock and Dam No. 9, AR ................. 18-3 10. Lock and Dam No. 13, AR ................. 18-3 11. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR .................... 18-3 12. Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR ........ 18-3 13. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 18-4 14. Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR .................... 18-4 15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 18-4 16. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), A R ............................... 18-4 Flood Control 17. Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO...18-4 18. Blue Mountain Lake, AR .................. 18-4 19. Clearwater Lake, MO ..................... 18-4 20. DeQueen Lake, AR ....................... 18-5 21. Dierks Lake, AR ......................... 18-5 22. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ............................. 18-5 23. Gillham Lake, AR ......................... 18-5 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 18-5 25. Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR ..... 18-6 26. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR ............................... 18-6 27. Little River Basin (Little Rock District), A R ...... ................................ 18-6 28. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR ............... 18-6 29. Millwood Lake, AR ...................... 18-6 30. Nimrod Lake, AR ......................... 18-7 31. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...................................18-7 Flood Control (cont) 32. Otter Creek & Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR ........................ 18-7 33. Swan Creek, Bank Stab., Taney County, MO ........................ 18-7 34. White River, Bank Stab., Batesville, AR ............................ 18-7 35. White River Basin (Little Rock District) AR & M O ................................ 18-7 36. White River, Jacksonport, AR..............18-8 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 37. Beaver Lake, AR .......................... 18-8 38. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ..................... 18-8 39. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR ..... 18-8 40. Greers Ferry Lake, AR ................... 18-9 41. Norfork Lake, AR ........................ 18-9 42. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), AR .............................. 18-9 43. Table Rock Lake, MO ..................... 18-9 General Investigations 44. Surveys ................................. 18-10 45. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 18-10 46. Continuation of Planning and Engineering 18-10 Tables Table 18-A Table 18-B Table 18-C Table 18-D Table 18-E Table 18-F Table 18-G Table 18-H Table 18-I Table 18-J Table 18-K Table 18-L Cost & Financial Statement ....... 18-11 Authorizing Legislation ........... 18-14 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 18-16 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 18-17 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............ 18-18 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation .............. 18-19 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes .................. 18-22 Little River Basin, AR: Lakes ..... 18-23 White River Basin, AR and MO: Lakes ........................... 18-24 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 18-25 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 559 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel of 9 feet deep and 445.3 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 18-H and 18-I, and Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation Lakes. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities were in operation at Pine Bluff-Jefferson County, Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 30 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Blue Mountain, Canton, Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), Dardanelle Marine Terminal, David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Elk City, Eufaula, Fall River, Fort Gibson, Keystone, W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14), Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17), Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No. 18), Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir (No. 15), Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No. 16) and Oologah; Locks and Dams Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 13. Markham Ferry, Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), Nimrod, Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1), Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Pensacola, Pine Bluff Marine Terminal, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Tenkiller Ferry, Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), Toronto, and Wister were in operation. Construction is complete on bank stabilization. For details of McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see report of Tulsa District. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 18-H and 18-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/ Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. The overall project is 99 percent complete. Remaining work in this District is the Holla Bend closure structure, rock excavation, Pool 7, land acquisition, and detailed engineering studies of the entrance channel, meander cutoff in the entrance channel, Dam No. 2, and the North Little Rock floodwall and levee. 2. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White Rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the Annual Report FY 81. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. 3. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. 18-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. 4. LITTLE ROCK SLACKWATER HARBOR, ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Location. On the right bank of the Arkansas River at navigation mile 111.5, Little Rock, AR, along the Arkansas River. Existing project. Slackwater harbor studies were completed and the Asst. Sec. of Army for Civil Works approved the Corps participation in the project in April 1986. Plans and specifications have been prepared. The Corps will excavate an access channel 130 feet wide and 4,800 feet long with a 500-foot diameter turning basin at the landward end. The sponsor will pay for the excavation of 50-foot berthing areas along the channel, provide the land and construct levees required to contain the excavated material. The sponsor will also extend utilities to the site and provide improvements necessary for use of the disposal area by water-oriented industry. Estimated construction cost is $2,900,000: $760,000, Federal; $2,140,000, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement has been executed by the local sponsor, the Little Rock Port Authority, and the Government. 5. LOCK AND DAM NO. 2, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at Dam 2 that resulted from the barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in April 1967 and dam was placed in operation in March 1968. 6. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 7. LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 9, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986. Completion scheduled for FY 87. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. 10. LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. 11. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and it was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 12. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreation facilities are complete except for cost sharing items under the 710 program. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 13. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). See project writeup for Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, AR. (Total preauthorization study costs thru FY 85 - $175,000; FY 86 costs for plans and specifications - $103,970.) 14. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Recommended modification. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, MS, is conducting a test model of an addition lock and dam in the White River Entrance Channel. This alternative is being tested to relieve restrictions on the navigation system during low flows. WES has determined that the other alternatives tested would not solve the low-flow problem. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. 16. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to that city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Flood Control 17. BLACK RIVER, BUTLER COUNTY ROAD 607, MO Location. On the right bank of the Black River at approximately river mile 208.7 southeast of Poplar Bluff, in Butler County, MO. Existing project. Placement of stone along approximately 250 feet of bank to curtail erosion which threatened the county road and a local levee. The construction work was completed in September 1985. The cost of the project was $39,500. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. Butler County, the local sponsor, assumed operation and maintenance of the project in June 1986. 18. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-I, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $5,069,974. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Blue Mountain Lake for prevention of flood damages were $619,000 for a total of $18,885,000 through September 30, 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in May 1940, and was placed in operation in March 1947. 19. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. See Table 18-K. White River Basin, AR &MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $11,395,000. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Recommended modification. Construction of a seepage berm, a grout curtain on the right abutment and a parapet wall along the dam was approved in September 1986. Material for the seepage berm will be obtained from the spillway area so that the project after construction will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood. The estimated project cost is approximately $14,800,000. Plans and specifications for this work will be prepared in FY 87. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Clearwater Lake for prevention of flood damages were $10,259,000, for a total of $74,772,000 through September 30, 1986. Releases made from lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreational facilities. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 18-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT 20. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 6 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of project is $19,623,752. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to DeQueen Lake for prevention of flood damages were $257,000 for a total of $4,564,000 through September 30, 1985. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966 and project placed in useful operation in August, 1977. 21. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24-inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acrefeet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is $16,002,781. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $44,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $2,714,000. During the year, 250 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 22. FSPLEOCOIDA LC ONTROL WORK UNDER AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank protection (Section 14of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong). The projects are: Study phase: Big Springs Development Area, Carter Co., MO $7,500 Bryant Creek, Warren Bridge, Ozark Co., MO $6,426 Construction phase: Black River, County Road 607, Popular Bluff, MO -$6,200 Swan Creek Bridge, Taney Co., MO - $61,343 White River, Batesville, AR - $91,299 Total costs expended during FY 86 - $172,768 Small flood control projects (Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended). During FY 86, there were 17 ongoing studies: 2 in the detailed project stage, 10 in the reconnaissance stage, and 5 in the appraisal stage. For status of studies, see Table 18-L. Funds expended on small flood control projects in study phase: $395,290. Funds were also expended on two Section 205 projects under construction: White River, Jacksonport, AR ($1,579,228) and Little Red River, Clinton, AR ($2,815,619). For details see individual projects. 23. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Gillham Dam, quandrangle, AR, quandrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Page 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $17,826,703. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $135,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $4,745,000. During the year 738 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1963. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Cost for fiscal year was $76,048. Total cost through September 30, 1986, was $1,034,398. 25. LITTLE MASSARD CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southeast Fort Smith, near Highway 22 and East of 1-540, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of a 30-foot width earthen channel between river mile 1.104 and 1.49 and alteration of the 91st Street bridge over Little Massard Creek. A construction contract was awarded in September 1983. Construction costs of the project are $187,887: $109,578, Federal; $78,309, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the project sponsor, provided the required local assurances contained in the June 7, 1983, local cooperation agreement. Operation during the fiscal year. Local interests assumed operation and maintenance of the project on July 19, 1984. An O&M manual is being prepared. 26. LITTLE RED RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CLINTON, AR Location. In Clinton, Van Buren County, AR, along the tributaries of the Little Red River. The city lies between the tributaries of Archey Fork and South Fork and is bisected by Town Branch. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of 100-foot bottom-width channel for 1.35 miles on Archey Fork Creek and a 300-foot bottom-width channel for 1.99 miles on South Fork, Little Red River. Local cooperation. The city of Clinton, the project sponsor, provided the required local assurances contained in the January 3, 1983, local cooperation agreement. Operations during the fiscal year. The construction work (contract awarded in June 1985) was completed and the project was officially transferred to the city of Clinton in August 1986 for operation and maintenance. Mitigation measures to compensate for damages to the walleye pike fishery are being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. An O&M manual is being prepared. 27. LITTLE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries, Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-J, Little River Basin. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 28. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The detailed project report was approved December 5, 1985. The plan of improvement consists of improving 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifying six bridges. The estimated project cost is $4,780,000: $2,390,000, Federal; $2,390,000, non-Federal. The study, which began under the General Investigations Program, has been shifted to the Continuing Authority Program due to the size of the project. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds have been provided ($162,000) to initiate plans and specifications. Total cost of the plans and specifications is estimated at $332,700. 29. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Red Bluff, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 49,045 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Millwood Lake 18-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT for prevention of flood damages for the fiscal year were $290,000, for a total of $6,156,000 to September 30, 1986. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. Work required to complete project consists of additional recreational facilities under the cost sharing program. 30. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-I, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Nimrod Lake for prevention of flood damages were $1,278,000, for a total of $11,562,000 through September 1986. Eighty-four acre-feet of water were withdrawn by the city of Plainview, AR, from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreation facilities. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 32. OTTER CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, SHANNON HILLS, AR Location. In Shannon Hills, Saline County, about 10 miles southwest of Little Rock, AR. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consisted of construction of a 50-foot channel upstream of Beechwood Street to about 2,000 feet downstream of the corporate limits, and the replacement of the bridge at Shannon Hills Drive in the community of Shannon Hills. Final inspection of the project was performed in December 1985. Local cooperation. The city of Shannon Hills, the project sponsor, provided the required local assurances (easements and rights-of-entry) January 5, 1984. Operations during the fiscal year. The city has assumed operation and maintenance of the project. An O&M manual is being prepared. 33. SWAN CREEK BANK STABILIZATION, TANEY COUNTY, MO Location. Swan Creek, river mile 2.35, at the Swan Creek Bridge, County Road 160-10, near Forsyth, Missouri. Existing project. The bank stabilization project extends 400 feet upstream and 100 feet downstream from the Swan Creek Bridge. A contract was approved and construction was completed in September 1986. The total cost of the project was $76,800. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. Taney County, the local sponsor, will assume operation and maintenance of the project. 34. WHITE RIVER BANK STABILIZATION, BATESVILLE, AR Location. At White River mile 299.5, Batesville, Arkansas. Existing project. The project provided 1,000 feet of stabilization to protect the left bank of the White River and a buried sewer main line. A contract was approved and construction was completed in March, 1986. The total cost of the project was $101,100. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. The city of Batesville, the local sponsor, assumed operation and maintenance of the project in May 1986. 35. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-K, White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. Plan now includes seven lakes, of which two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. Bell Foley lake was reclassified to inactive in June 1977; reviewed for the purpose of deauthorization and placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Lakes in plan are listed in Table 18-K, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork. 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Estimated monetary flood control benefits attributed to Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Greers Ferry, and Clearwater lakes for FY 86 totaled $42,331,000. A cumulative total of flood damages prevented by the lakes through September 30, 1986, is estimated at $269,150,000. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during the fiscal year totaled 3,387,660,600 kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acrefeet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery, 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery, and 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, 29,448 acre-feet from Beaver Lake: Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 2,322 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, AR, and the city of Clinton, AR, 1,793 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project has been placed in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 36. WHITE RIVER, JACKSONPORT, AR Location. In the west-central part of Jackson County at Jacksonport, about 2 miles northwest of Newport at the confluence of the White and Black Rivers. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of raising 5.1 miles of the existing levee and extending it about 1.4 miles to high ground to provide an approximate 100-year level of protection plus 3 feet of free board. Project was approved and funds provided for construction in September 1983. Construction contract for $1,907,000 was awarded September 28, 1984; final inspection of work was made April 23, 1986. Local cooperation. The city of Jacksonport, the project sponsor, acquired all the necessary land, easements, and rights-of-way for the project. Operations during the fiscal year. The city of Jacksonport, the local sponsor, has assumed operation and maintenance of the project. An O&M manual is being prepared. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 37. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. See table 18-K. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of .1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $4,276,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $19,036,000. During the year, 214,486,100 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 29,448 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. 38. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $10,827,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $78,988,000. During the year, 875,037,000 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 39. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 30), AR Location. See Table 18-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) 18-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 86, 800,595,600 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line April, May. and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock was placed in operation in December 1969. Lock was unwatered, inspected, and repaired September 14-23. 1981. Information Center and resident office were completed in FY 85. 40. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. See table 18-K, White River, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740of 1964 Annual Report. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $404,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $16,776,000. During the year. 148,946,100 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 1,793 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957. was ready for beneficial use for flood control in January 1962. and power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in March and May 1964, and water supply was placed in operation in April 1971. The visitors center was completed in June 1984 at a cost of $922,340. 41. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-K, White River Basin, AR & M O. Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, including S38.700.000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, and 840.000.000 for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1988 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Opei'ations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $5,585,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at 829.849.000. During the year, 214,673,800 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Eightyfour acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by the City of Plainview, AR. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 42. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. See Table 18-H, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed. It has a spillway with 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, I foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No. 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Estimated cost is $86,167,000. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Delivered 488,006,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: Unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973, and unit 5, May 1974. Work remaining consists principally of modifications to powerplant. 43. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. See Table 18-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For further information see page 893of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 86 are estimated at $10,680,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $49,729,000. During the year 645,916,000 kilowatt-hours 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 44. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $727,719: $374,438, flood damage prevention studies; $103,041, comprehensive studies; $5,138, review of completed projects; $13,467, project deauthorization review; $32,973, special investigations; $3,207, review of FERC licenses; $3,793, coordination studies with other agencies, and $191,662 for planning assistance to states. 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for these services for the fiscal year were $246,699. Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority for the FPMS program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain managemrnent planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished during FY 86 totaled 14,700. This total included services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Costs for providing these services during FY 1986 totaled $245,402. Hydrologic studies. During the fiscal year, 107 stations were operated, 75 cooperatively with USGS and 32 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding for FY 1986 was $536,330, of which $398,830 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $31,303 was transferred to the National Weather Service. 46. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING During this fiscal year, a total of $349,041 was expended: Fourche Bayou - vicinity of Little Rock, AR ($497,043), and North Little Rock (Dark Hollow), AR ($51,998). 18-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1 ,2, 3 See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 19862 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., & Kans. 2. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR 3, 5-10, 12, 14, 16. Navigation Locks & Dams, AR 4. Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR 17. Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO 18. Blue Mountain Lake, AR 19. Clearwater Lake, MO New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. A prop. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost. Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 2,872,052 138,052 2,734,000 5,024,761 120,404 4,904,357 42,620,015 9,051,008 33,569,007 42,359,344 9,316,208 32,998,136 $ 2,144,000 -72,000 2,216,000 2,456,752 71,746 2,385,006 40,244,566 8,849,697 31,394,869 42,894,970 8,881,670 34,013,300 3,450,000 3,450,000 2,464,283 7,366 2,456,917 52,292,456 10,730,500 41,561,956 53,144,241 10,637,899 42,506,342 $ 971,000 971,000 1,072,738 1,072,738 51,802,900 11,478,700 40,324,200 56,383,991 12,196,588 44,187,403 $1,461,206,127 150,318,533 1,310,887,594 1,459,467,728 150,279,504 1,309,188,224 599,984,7793 132,856,290 467,128,489 601,784,8923 132,505,937 469,278,955 - 291,106 - 291,106 - 1,609,842 - 1,609,842 - 19,926,755 - 19,926,755 - 531,336 - 531,336 - 119,300,184 - 119,300,184 - 4,561,666 - 4,561,666 2,652,000 4,868,815 12,144,000 13,179,192 621,400 642,803 49,781 1,520,100 1,632,220 2,220,000 2,600,000 493,000 422,022,473 2,331,168 2,419,272 785,392 421,417,248 [2,302,000 11,466,000 12,237,000 187,203,802; [5,282,239 16,019,197 15,261,530 189,568,177; - - - 973,385 - - - 963,567 - - - 531,336 - - - 531,336 - - 110,000 110,000' - - 103,970 103,970 5,000 35,500 4,000 44,5005 135 38,165 6,200 44,50(}' - - - 5,069,974 - - - 5,069,974 627,000 656,000 624,000 9,820,294:; 675,029 652,016 636,896 9,813,177:; - - - 10,453,403 - - - 10,440,204 1,469,000 1,342,000 1,419,000 20,547,522; 1,633,639 1,366,720 1,391,455 20,518,143 18-11 ------- 11 - --- --- - - REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1 ,2,3 See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 19862 20. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, AR 21. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR 23. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 25. Little Massard Crk, Fort Smith, AR (Contributed Funds) 26. Little Red River & Tributaries, 27. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.) 28. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR 29. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR 30. Nimrod Lake, AR 32. Otter Creek & Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR 33. Swan Creek, Bank Stabilization, Taney County, MO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approx. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 12,000 92,539 576,200 623,408 -12,000 19,388 613,500 468,756 361 527,700 473,013 00 nnA -1,100 37 515,000 585,145 14,770 510,000 595,000 -1,600 2,006 495,000 642,099 y~,1 l - 1,100 77,400 - 95,000 - 77,725 1,757,500 (1,456,000) 195,758 92,952 - -2,700 122,753 56,371 3,370,900 3,513,000 3,175,154 4,181,253 10,465 1,653,500 1,609,977 23,623 777,000 790,927 322,000 39,558 1,993,000 2,358,113 671,000 674,275 195 685,000 721,135 809,C 805,3 624,( 649,E 626,000 816,( 574,264 841,8 - 18,( 1,138 3 1,060,000 2,550,( 777,727 2,815,(6 3,539, 3,577,c 335 1,1 500 3,336,( )91 3,632,9 - 162,( - 99,4 7,640 1,557,500 1,608,317 147 - 589,000 919,000 747,627 820,871 (70,000) 0 147,126 10,050 - 11,500 - 9,313 1,1 1,323,( 1,335,4 922,C 914,3 (24,7 65,E 61,E - 19,629,753 - 19,623,752 )00 5,108,03&3 368 5,079,99&3 - 16,002,904 - 16,002,781 )00 5,480,7033 313 5,470,2423 - 17,827,111 - 17,826,703 )00 4,620,4853 372 4,568,7243 )96 110,0964 339 80,000 - 95,000 - 77,725 300 3,911,5005 519 3,686,2985 - 99,959,850 127 99,544,384 000 34,336,2803 464 34,172,0373 00 162,0004 193 99,4934 - 46,087,3823 127 46,091,1483 600 18,865,6623 111 19,053,0813 - 4,092,826 - 4,005,627 300 11,468,738; 350 11,450,7143 796) 239,7045 0 157,1764 300 76,8005 343 70,6565 18-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1,2,3 See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 19862 34. White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR 35. White River Basin (Little Rock District) 36. White River, Jacksonport, AR 37. Beaver Lake, AR 38. Bull Shoals Lake, AR 39. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10), AR 40. Greers Ferry Lake, AR 41. Norfork Lake, AR 42. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No. 12), AR 43. Table Rock Lake, MO New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work .Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Includes funds (total cumulative amount $3,839,700 (excluding $236,700 expended for Continuing Authority projects)) provided in the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 18-M of FY 85 Annual Report. 3. Beginning data shown in Table 18-A includes special recreation use fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 4. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 5. Includes total project funds. 18-13 - - 19,500 91,600 111,10@ - - 19,500 91,600 111,100 2,601,500 20,700 - - 335,031,873 2,390,010 936,207 288,799 160,297 334,749,661 [7,974,850 15,455,000 16,366,500 15,961,000 235,266,47 7 L8,315,445 16,641,871 16,875,975 18,584,487 237,543,706:; 2,438,500 (616,000) - 948,000 2,770,500 234,943 82,901 864,801 1,579,228 2,761,8735 -16,500 -4,300 - - 46,183,033 10,675 3,933 4,039 - 46,112,072 2,415,650 2,200,000 2,555,500 3,043,600 31,174,429 2,295,790 2,326,174 2,563,211 3,082,886 31,134,640 - - - - 88,858,711 385 - - - 88,858,707 4,656,300 3,386,000 3,889,500 4,754,600 49,909,353 4,813,600 3,625,680 4,210,600 4,754,193 54,419,538 - - - - 84,270,124 - - - - 84,261,240 3,027,056 3,198,000 3,541,000 3,751,000 43,503,869 2,939,073 3,372,791 3,575,685 3,633,834 43,261,128; - - - - 48,865,512 77,853 - - - 48,865,512 3,554,700 3,061,000 3,197,500 3,745,600 42,658,138 3,710,151 3,230,760 3,256,122 3,716,466 42,535,269 2,618,000 25,000 - - 70,997,929 2,231,986 847,235 - 159,899 70,715,709 2,544,900 2,264,000 2,238,500 2,423,600 39,338,191 2,572,873 2,394,031 2,310,590 2,442,185 39,190,901; - - - - 85,629,412 10,532 89 - - 85,629,412 3,823,256 2,923,000 2,608,000 2,295,000 35,591,478:3 3,771,288 3,537,134 2,839,221 2,322,962 35,566,822' - - - - 67,224,000 19,330 - - - 67,224,000 3,283,200 3,075,000 3,134,500 3,229,600 49,813,366; 3,294,812 3,431,587 3,168,732 3,197,302 49,732,336 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960 June 10, 1948 June 30, 1948 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of Text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and MO, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, -OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood CRoivnetrr ol Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all previous authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 25 of Text.) Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, Little Rock, AR (See Section 4 of Text.) Mill Creek Fort Smith, AR (See Section 28 of Text.) Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR. (See Section 32 of Text.) 18-14 Flood Control Cornm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 27 of Text) July 24, 1946 July 3. 1958 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 1960 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 35 of Text) Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake., AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Jacksonport State Park in Jackson County, Arkansas. Improvements along the White River for recreation and navigation and the protection of the park which is historically significant. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (See Section 17 of Text.) Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (See Section 26 of Text.) Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, MO. (See Section 33 of Text.) White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, AR. (See Section 34 of Text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Jacksonport, AR. (See Section 36 of Text.) H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess Flood Control Conm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290. 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong. 2d sess. River and Harbor Act of 1960 as amended Section 107 H. Doc. 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Conm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105 Section 205, P.L. 80-85&8. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 18-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, AR, and MO ' 1950 $ 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, AR, and MO ' 1964 17,0002 132,178 Upper White River, AR 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, AR, (above Peach Orchard Bluff)' 1950 - 785,666 1. Channel adequate for existing commerce. Completion not contemplated. 2. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 3. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1, 2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Cong. 4. Completed. 5. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR, transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 18-16 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR 1 Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Clarksville, AR Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Crooked Creek, Lake and Levee, AR" East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR; Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Newport, White River, AR North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Petit Jean River, AR Pine Mountain Lake, AR ' Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR6 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, AR7 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR White River, at Hwy 14, 1j mile east of Oil Trough, AR Inactive 1975 $1.407.116 - Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Cancelled Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed 1958 1951 1962 1959 1952 1952 1954 1969 1958 1941 1951 1954 1973 1983 1975 1950 1953 1941 1958 1966 1985 1950 1983 1941 1964 1961 1952 1972 1977 19(i62 1981 584,315 919,955 271,717 187,440 1,018,840 390,952 2,001,820 304,699 99,511 1,077,546 845,300 22,890 63,355 1,901,899 422,549 198,069 314,276 512,001 84,350 1,432,331 269,907 64,500 81,023 1,404,852 409,115 438,222 1,567,156 510,217 1,269,959 214,308 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & deferred in May '85. 2. Recommended for deauthorization in Sep '86. 3. Construction of project cancelled because local interests failed to provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. 6. See H Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for description of project. 7. Reclassified in Jun '77; inability of local interests to meet local cooperation requirements. 18-17 TABLE 18-G Project Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last F Full Report See Annual Date Feder Report For Authority Deauthorized Fund, 1959 1938 FCA 1977 $130,65 1959 1983 FCA 1977 $414,0 unds Expended al Contributed s Funds 3 - 18-18 TABLE 18-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Char- Year Up- Uper Depth on Miter acter Opened stream Lock Pool Sill of Kind to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- of Type of Navi- Estimated Feature Mouth 1 Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction gation Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell L&D No. 1 Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D No. 6 Murray L&D No. 7 Toad Suck Ferry L&D No. 8 L&D No. 9 10.3 13.3 40.5 50.2 66.0 86.3 108.1 125.4 155.9 176.9 8 east of Arkansas Post, AR 6 east of Arkansas Post, AR 3 southeast Arkansas Post, AR 5 north of Grady, AR 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 6 west of Conway, AR 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 30 max. 20 nom. 28 max. 20 14 17 18 18 16 19 142 162 182 196 213 231 249 265 -287 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Clay Piles in sand Shale Shale Shale Fixed overflow Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Concrete Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 $34,265,000 43,869,000 33,791,000 40,831,000 29.568,000 62.585,000 37,492,000 56,912,000 34.357,000 TABLE 18-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Char- Year Up- Upper Depth on Miter acter Opened stream Lock Pool Sill of Kind to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- of Type of Navi- Estimated Feature Mouth' Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction gation Cost Dardanelle 205.5 2 northwest of 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Movable Sandstone Gated concrete 1969 $84,270,124 L&D No. 10 L&D No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D (No. 12) L&D No. 13 TULSA DISTRICT L&D No. 13 (part) W. D. Mayo L&D No. 14 Robert S. Kerr L&D No. 15 Webbers Falls L&D No. 16 Chouteau L&D No. 17 Newt Graham L&D No. 18 256.8 292.8 319.6 336.2 366.6 401.4 421.6 Dardanelle, ARI Deleted 1 east of Ozark. AR 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 4 east of Redland, OK 1 north of Cowlington, OK 1 northwest of Gore, OK 4 northwest of Okay, OK 8 southwest of Inola, OK 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 6O) 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 6(X00) 34 20 20 48 30 21 21 370 392 412 460 490 511 532 18 18 14 18 19 15 15 15 14 15 14 16 14 14 Sandstone and shale Sandstone and shale Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 0 1969 1969 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 85,629.412 46.187.000 6.858.000 32.655,000 94,578,237 83,738,277 31,619,000 44,355,000 l TABLE I8-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 per cent complete .............. $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 99 per cent complete .. ............................... 7,500,000 Total, Little Rock District ................................ 716,556,720 Navigation aids (US Coast Guard).. ...................... 2,268,000 Tulsa District:; Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete ................................... 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, com plete .................................................. 2,750,000 Subtotal ................................ ................ $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes:; Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ........................ ......................... $ 46,722,329 Keystone, 63&8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, com plete ................................................ 123,171,173 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, com plete ................................................ 122,680,747 Subtotal .............................................. 292,574,249 Total, Tulsa District.................................... 601,827,801 Total Project Cost 99.8 percent complete................ $1,318,384,521 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River except Dam No. 2 is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Includes cost of entrance channel. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. TABLE 18-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Total Lake and State River Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estimated Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 5,069,974 Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 -1948 11,209,834 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 (Table Mound) 107 Earthfill 284,300 - 1966 19,052,990 Eufaula, OK 1'2 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 122,680,747 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 10,550,873 Fort Gibson, OK' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete-gravity 1,284,400 45,000 1953 43,713,378 Keystone, OK' 2 a Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 Earthfill 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,171,173 Markham Ferry, OK' a Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908,756 Neodesha, KS5 Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 97,910 Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Concrete-gravity 336,010 - 1942 4,092,826 Oologah, OK2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Earthfill 1,519,000 - 1974 46,722.329 Pensacola, OK' 6 Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 Concrete arch 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52,126 Tenkiller Ferry, OK' 3 Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 24,115,719 Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Earthfill 199,700 - 1960 13,896,324 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 - 1949 10,501,226 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah, 93 percent complete 149,261,936 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent complete 1,467,646,457 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O' The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 27 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 18-23 TABLE 18-K WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES (See Section 35 of Text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Total Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost 1 Beaver2 White 609.0 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 50,797,000 Bell Foley " Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 51&8,000 - 93,700,000 Bull Shoals2 White 418.6 Mountain Home. AR 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,356,000 Clearwater'' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 - 11,395,000 Greers Ferry" Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs. AR 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,000 Norfork2 North Fork 4.8 Norfork. AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,000 Table Rock2 White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,000 Total 15,580,000 828,550 490,230,000 1. Current FY price levels unless otherwise noted. 2. For details, see individual reports. 3. Inactive-placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1982 price levels. LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Section 205, PL 858, 80th Cong., as amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 22 of Text) Total Costs Study Identification Initiation Status Completion FY 86 through Date Date Costs Sept. 30, 1986 Black River, South Poplar Bluff, MO' Aug 1983 Recon' *Oct 1985 $ 31,908 $ 67,500 Blossom Way Creeks, Rogers. AR' Aug 1983 Recon' *Sep 1985 243 112,482 Carter Creek & Spring River, Carthage, MO Apr 1986 Appraisal *Sep 1986 - - Cloverdale Drain, Little Rock, AR' Dec 1983 DPR' *Sep 1986 33,411 96,520 Crooked & Dry Jordan Creeks, Harrison, AR' Aug 1983 Recon 2 1,377 84,954 Current River & Tributary A, Van Buren. MO Jun 1984 Recon Oct 1987 4,486 12,766 Holly & Dierks Creeks, Dierks, AR Aug 1983 Recon May 1987 20,048 39,522 Howell Creek & Tributaries, West Plains, MO' Sep 1982 DPR' *Sep 1985 1,473 251,500 Hurricane Creek, Ashdown, AR Sep 1983 Recon Jul 1987 7,478 23,998 Jam Up & Tributary A, Mountain View, MO Jun 1984 Recon *Jul 1986 17,500 17,500 Kelley Creek, Monett, AR Sep 1983 Recon Jun 1987 34,939 73,554 Logan & Dickson Creeks, Ellington, MO' Feb 1983 DPR: *Apr 1985 656 145,656 Lost & Little Lost Creeks, Seneca, MO : Aug 1983 DPR *Apr 1985 1,266 76,266 Mayflower, AR' Apr 1985 Appraisal' *Aug 1985 5,000 5,000 McKenzie Creek, Piedmont, MO Sep 1983 DPR Jun 1987 51,690 115,021 Mine & Dodson Creeks, Nashville, AR' Jan 1983 Recon' *Jan 1986 3,281 87,286 Pike Creek, Poplar Bluff, MO' Feb 1983 DPR' *Mar 1985 3,102 182,491 Piney and Tucker Creeks, Alton, MO Jun 1984 Recon *Aug 1985 16,000 16,000 Prairie Creek, Russellville, AR Nov 1983 Recon *May 1987 - 55,964 Sulphur Creek, Heber Springs, AR Aug 1983 Recon Oct 1987 10,370 17,570 Taylor Loop Creek, Hwy 10, Little Rock, AR Sep 1986 Appraisal Nov 1986 - Tributary 2, Bentonville, AR' Mar 1983 Recon' *Feb 1985 539 102,500 Tucker Creek, Conway, AR' Sep 1984 Appraisal' *Aug 1985 8,843 8,843 White River, Batesville, AR Aug 1983 DPR Apr 1987 34,688 135,128 White River, St. Paul, AR' Aug 1985 Appraisal4 *Sep 1986 - - *Accomplished. 1. No further studies recommended. 2. Unscheduled - unfunded. 3. City unable to provide assurances. 4. Further study recommended. 18-25 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas- Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, AR. The District is also responsible for operation and maintenance of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in Oklahoma. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK ............... 19-2 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ... 19-2 Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK ................... 19-2 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX ....... 19-2 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs ............. 19-3 4b. Area VIII ......................... . 19-3 5. Birch Lake, OK ...................... 19-3 6. CandyLake,OK ..................... 19-3 7. Canton Lake, OK .................... 19-3 8. Copan Lake, OK ..................... 19-3 9. Council Grove Lake, KS............... 19-3 10. El Dorado Lake, KS .................. 19-4 11. ElkCityLake,KS .................. 19-4 12. Fall River Lake, KS .................. 19-4 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK ................ 19-4 14. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK ............ 19-4 15. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK ... 19-4 16. Hugo Lake, OK ..................... 19-4 17. Hulah Lake, OK ..................... 19-4 18. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS .. 19-5 19. Kaw Lake, OK ...................... 19-5 20. Lake Kemp, TX ..................... 19-5 21. Marion, KS ........................ 19-5 22. Marion Lake, KS ................... 19-5 23. Oologah Lake, OK ................... 19-5 24. Optima Lake, OK .................... 19-5 25. Pat Mayse Lake, TX ................. 19-5 26. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS ...... 19-5 27. Pinc Creek Lake, TX ................. 19-6 28. Sardis Lake, OK ..................... 19-6 29. Skiatook Lake, OK ................... 19-6 30. Toronto Lake, KS .................... 19-6 31. Waurika Lake, OK ................... 19-6 32. W ister Lake, OK ..................... 33. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . 34. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects .................. 35. Flood Damages Prevented by Corps and Non-Corps Projects ................... 36. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 37. Broken Bow Lake, OK ................ 38. Eufaula Lake, OK .................. 39. Fort Gibson Lake, OK ................ 40. Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, OK ...... 41. Keystone Lake, OK ................. 42. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX .. ......................... 43. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK .................... 44. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK ............. 45. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK ....... General Investigations 46. Surveys ... ........................ 47. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 48. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ........................ 49. Advanced Engineering and Design ...... Tables 19-A Cost and Financial Statement .......... 19-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 19-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. . 19-D Not Applicable 19-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . 19-F Not Applicable 19-G Not Applicable 19-1 19-6 19-6 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-9 19-13 19-15 19-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 19-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple- Non-Corps Projects ..................... 19-17 Purpose Plan ......................... 19-16 19-K Flood Control Work Under Special 19-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Authorization ........................ 19-19 Protection Projects .................... 19-17 19-L General Investigations ................. 19-20 19-J Flood Damages Prevented by Corps and Navigation 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in the Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and a minimum width of 250 feet on the Arkansas River, and a minimum width of 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of the: Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK. At Sallisaw, OK a port authority has been active in seeking development of public facilities at that location. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See table 19-C. Flood Control. 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 213.8, in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 104 feet high and 5,200 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works will consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake will have a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve) and will control a drainage area of 105 square miles. Construction began in October 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938; Water Supply Act of 1958; Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965; and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 87 percent complete. Estimated cost is $84,200,000 (October 1986 price level). Work to complete the relocation of the Turner Turnpike and to complete the embankment, spillway, and recreation facilities, and the clearing of some project land was performed during the fiscal year. 4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. Provided for studies involving the control of natural water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources which are severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies were completed in 1966 and 1970 and recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. 19-2 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 4a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. The plan of improvement consisted of an earthen dike, 9 feet high and 340 feet in diameter, around Estelline Springs. The springs were a salt water source which decreased the usability of the surface water in the area. Construction was started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. 4b. AREA VIII. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of two low-flow collection dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities. These two structures (the Bateman Low Flow Dam and the Ross Ranch Low Flow Dam) will be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brines will be pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, would contain the collected brines from this area as well as future collections from Area X. Preconstruction planning for Area X is essentially complete and construction is awaiting approval from the Secretary of the Army and funding from Congress. Local cooperation. See page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976 and the project is 98 percent complete. Estimated cost of the Area VIII project and Stage I development of Truscott Brine Dam is $50,325,000 (October 1985 price level). 5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 6. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10- by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18- by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938; Water Supply Act of 1958; and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is about 13 percent complete, but construction has been delayed because of the U.S. Justice Department's decision to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project is $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level). The project was deferred in January 1984. 7. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 8. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Copan Lake became operational in 1983. There are some real estate deficiencies remaining to be settled, some final contract payments, and construction of remaining recreation facilities, for which funds were provided in FY 86. 9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris 19-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Construction began in October 1938 and the project was Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El1 Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a threelake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973 and impoundment began in June 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 99 percent complete. Work to complete the real estate activities and recreational facilities was performed during the fiscal year. 11. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the dam began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 14. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 15. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary to the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction was started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 17. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 19-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 18. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. MARION, KS. Location. On Mud Creek at Marion, the county seat of Marion County, KS. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-6 of the Annual Report for 1984. Construction began in June 1975 and was completed in May 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. The city of Marion, KS, is responsible for project operation and maintenance. 22. MARION LAKE, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950 and was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction was resumed in December 1955 and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 24. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966, impoundment began in October 1978, and construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 26. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 19-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 27. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Work to complete sanitary facilities at the park was conducted during the fiscal year. 28. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake will be operated as a unit of a threelake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin, including Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes. Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $66,772,000 (October 1986 price level). The project is 80 percent complete. Funds were provided in FY 86 to complete the remaining recreation facilities at full Federal expense. Work was initiated to improve an existing road from Daisy, Oklahoma, to the lake area. 29. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam 3,590 feet long, 143 feet high with a crown width of 32 feet. The uncontrolled 100-foot spillway will be located in the right abutment. Outlet works will consist of a controlled intake structure, a 10.5-foot-diameter tunnel stilling basin, a 2.5- by 5-foot low-flow sluice, and a 36-inch water supply pipe. The lake will provide a total storage of 513,500 acre-feet (319,400 for conservation storage, 182,300 for flood control, and 11,800 for sedimentation), and will control a drainage area of 354 square miles. Skiatook Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 92 percent complete. Estimated cost of the project is $113,300,000 (October 1986 price level), including deferred recreational development at $9,000,000. Work to plug oil and gas wells, complete real estate activities, and construct embankment, access roads, and recreation facilities was performed during the fiscal year. 30. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 32. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. ' Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See table 19-E. 19-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of the completed local flood protection projects operated and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers to determine if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See table 19-I for a list of projects inspected in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year cost was $94,155. 35. FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS AND NON-CORPS PROJECTS. The Corps is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944 to prescribe regulations for the use of flood control and navigation storages at all reservoirs constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Through this act, operation of Corps and non-Corps reservoirs results in the prevention of flood damages. Flood damages are also prevented by local flood protection projects constructed by the Corps. Table 19-J lists these reservoir and local protection projects and presents their fiscal year and cumulative flood damage prevented amounts. Fiscal year cost for the maintenance of flood control works at non- Corps projects totaled $358,928. 36. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See table 19-K for Fiscal Year 1986 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects; Snagging and Clearing; and Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies - Rehabilitation Projects. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 37. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 19-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 38. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was place in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Work to plan, design, and construct a replacement bridge over Piney Creek was performed during the fiscal year. 39. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction of the concrete dam and spillway started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 40. GRAND LAKE O' THE CHEROKEES, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 77.0, near the town of Disney in Mayes County, OK. (See Spavinaw, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Grand Lake O' the Cherokees is a Grand River Dam Authority project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control operations at the Grand Lake O' the Cherokees are controlled by the Corps. See Section 35 and Table 19-J for additional details. 41. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 42. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK and TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. 19-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939 and was completed for the dam, spillway, and outlet works in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third and fourth power units and additional perimeter access roads, which have been recommended for deferral. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 43. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units number 1, number 2, number 3, and number 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Seven sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 44. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK.(See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units number 1, number 2, and number 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility were built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority. Liquid cargo loading facility and steel unloading facility were built by Frontier Steel Company to serve existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 46. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $2,720,478 which included two navigation studies, nine flood damage prevention studies, three comprehensive studies, two restudies of deferred projects, two reviews of completed projects, two reviews for deauthorization studies, inventory of dams, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $305,037 which includes flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 48. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING. Fiscal year cost was $1,333,609 which includes four local protection projects and one flood control reservoir. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 49. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $390,387 which includes one local protection project and one flood control reservoir. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 19-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986' 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas New Work River Navigation System, OK. (Tulsa District Portion)* 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, OK and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs 4b. Area VIII 5. Birch Lake, OK 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK 8. Copan Lake, OK 9. Council Grove Lake, KS Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 296,553,114 - 296,553,538 7,571,632 6,540,500 7,600,266 8,635,900 110,355,111" 8,227,217 6,403,180 7,865,411 9,120,610 105,888,6912 20,430,000 3,800,000 9,330,000 6,646,000 73,540,289 12,765,430 8,967,266 9,687,358 11,417,121 73,425,877 - - - 100 100 - - - -315 -315 49,104 2,000 2,703 3,000 3,650 5,215 6,000 5,425 5,500 4,791 437 43,000 42,891 4,600 4,233 0 25,705,208 182 25,704,692 3,146 3,524,393 4,410 3,637,718 - 300,028 - 300,028 6,000 137,076 5,882 150,519 4,923,000 1,829,000 -33,000 943,000 5,317,748 1,527,050 562,003 601,912 - - - 127,300 - - - 127,232 1,006 583,200 564,174 27,026 -1,000 508 933,000 811,568 300,000 3,801,718 207,000 179,008 120 11,652 672,500 650,417 177 529,200 489,132 2,908 120 1,048,700 1,072,826 -104,440 316,200 305,573 46,493,000 45,630,415 127,300 127,232 - - 13,549,170 - - 13,549,296 .658,700 595,000 4,883,4012 735,047 611,520 8,182,8292 1,663 0 4,949,922 8,285 4,871,852 - - 11,209,834 - - 10,918,727 1,695,800 1,188,500 15,763,8722 1,766,592 1,297,427 15,838,9822 8,663,000 8,531,025 516,700 507,386 - -2,940 66 -2,940 615,866 864,200 565,348 899,513 3,092,000 1,050,879 491,000 501,204 88,226,999 88,780,750 1,530,900 1,493,171 - 11,810,509 - 11,810,509 856,000 8,739,6222 876,525 8,681,875" 19-9 TABLE 19-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986' 10. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work 11. Elk City Lake, KS 12. Fall River Lake, KS 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 15. Heyburn Lake, OK 16. Hugo Lake, OK 17. Hulah Lake, OK 18. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,700,000 6,806,749 330,000 302,618 -5,000 1,226 605,708 560,188 5,300,000UU 2,370,000 2,096,205 3,491,995 319,000 355,700 312,064 371,549 741 710,266 734,948 0 90,371,468 1,412,317 89,429,053 319,800 1,646,100 338,798 1,641,025 - - 19,052,990 - - 19,052,990 601,700 870,500 8,333,406" 532,204 917,213 8,264,6232 -520 - - - 10,550,873 - - - - 10,550,873 643,900 651,020 791,600 835,800 8,546,595' 604,595 640,445 587,760 1,091,136 8,702,217' - - - - 7,724,134 - - - - 7,723,127 503,500 476,000 624,000 475,974 487,499 634,882 331,000 272,900 458,000 314,860 291,510 307,513 2,800 -1,900 219 3,971 449,300 461,170 421,774 431,927 1,848 20,000 3,128 463,100 600,987 -279,088 671,000 8,164,073' 687,903 8,136,550 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 479,200 5,165,307 636,153 5,159,098 - 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 495,200 6,667,323 531,820 6,761,967' - 37,759,742 - 37,425,243 1,360,582 985,721 1,186,900 1,217,600 10,307,128' 911,554 1,447,283 1,103,885 1,264,286 10,164,318' 20,000 27,990 629,400 587,292 -2,400 15,130 615,970 484,631 2,500 878,300 835,107 - 11,388,150 - 11,182,433 291,600 9,136,879 497,400 9,081,069 - 135,718 - 135,718 - - - - 28,151,515 - - - - 28,151,515 823,000 1,202,000 3,776,066 1,380,600 15,033,655 752,018 850,643 4,123,729 1,563,663 15,108,932 19-10 TABLE 19-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 19. Kaw Lake, OK 20. Lake Kemp, TX 21. Marion, KS 22. Marion Lake, KS 23. Oologah Lake, OK 24. Optima Lake, OK 25. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 26. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 27. Pine Creek Lake, OK 28. Sardis Lake, OK TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986' 490,000 361,641 1,529,400 1,312,594 -71,900 - 0 109,430,750 214,312 -4,518 143,616 109,421,298 1,145,800 1,454,800 1,714,200 13,001,6682 1,165,463 1,407,293 2,080,047 12,927,6352 119,000 141,000 116,978 130,672 -81,000 -5,500 3,781 662,900 644,828 37,000 2,951 1,241,395 1,199,023 141 512,000 488,318 762,667 710,873 275,827 498,000 519,559 148,600 136,531 - 7,637,702 - 7,637,702 138,000 1,548,234 172,196 1,544,283 A 5 51a20 - - V JJJ ,6UU 339 7,227 29,616 5,485,050 71,000 - - 13,420,817 70,236 839 - 13,420,817 797,434 986,600 719,300 9,382,4462 730,648 1,028,180 789,868 9,351,249" -4,000 - - 46,722,3293 30,049 - - 46,721,5563 1,154,400 1,168,900 1,179,000 15,668,1042 1,074,913 1,200,842 1,306,646 15,631,2262 -10,000 1,201 420,368 455,925 442,400 455,332 - 47,173,438 - 47,273,438 485,500 3,203,022 490,736 3,195,893 848,900 1,185,400 930,000 620,839 1,347,577 1,018,712 - -241,000 45,090 -147,645 548,000 603,900 504,413 590,428 9,310,661 9,310,661 8,773,3092 8,715,4892 0 16,879,166 40 16,879,165 797,600 2,900,9002 825,038 2,882,5202 - 188,400 134,740 0 20,628,049 - 100,486 154,343 45,998 20,605,736 630,930 865,870 927,600 924,900 8,417,7582 607,598 645,695 1,008,083 1,065,137 8,349,2282 1,050,000 2,159,987 305,000 286,000 1,288,000 - 122,000 7,453,000 60,756,479 -27,969 696,504 1,055,291 53,741,143 395,000 451,100 673,700 1,824,800 378,047 451,528 671,787 1,787,362 19-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 19-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Txt Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30,1986' 29. Skiatook Lake, OK New Work Approp. 9,355,000 10,000,000 2,375,000 0 103,518,282 Cost 7,730,104 8,804,556 5,499,255 1,041,357 103,158,783 Maint. Approp. - - 218,400 578,600 797,000 Cost - - 202,153 524,973 727,126 30. Toronto Lake, KS New Work Approp. - - - - 13,896,324 Cost - - - - 13,896,324 Maint. Approp. 256,500 264,000 188,000 301,000 4,360,503 Cost 239,636 268,588 213,803 292,120 4,347,452 31. Waurika Lake, OK New Work Approp. - - - 0 67,080,050 Cost 122,799 1,314 - 12,313 24,340 66,927,698 Maint. Approp. 759,630 776,500 727,100 938,200 5,601,3442 Cost 751,347 730,723 770,961 958,274 4,589,2362 32. Wister Lake, OK New Work Approp. - - - - 10,501,226 Cost - - - - 10,501,226 Maint. Approp. 468,000 500,614 735,900 718,400 8,434,459 Cost 445,128 468,971 742,409 777,134 8,427,979 37. Broken Bow Lake, OK New Work Approp. - - - - 41,222,692 Cost - - - - 41,222,692 Maint. Approp. 2,030,000 1,213,463 1,527,500 1,274,100 13,878,419 Cost 1,229,088 1,809,738 1,629,880 1,393,509 13,849,473 38. Eufaula Lake, OK New Work Approp. - - 850,000 478,000 123,158,7475 Cost 11,203 200 37,645 287,346 122,144,5355 Maint. Approp. 2,697,400 2,495,070 2,737,100 3,137,400 38,717,3442 Cost 2,596,323 2,619,134 2,849,316 3,319,004 35,729,9452 39. Fort Gibson Lake, OK New Work Approp. 70,000 -14,000 - - 42,591,2986 Cost 23,146 35,489 6,625 - 43,497,7916 Maint. Approp. 2,504,900 2,378,281 2,685,400 2,898,800 35,798,6662 Cost 2,759,933 2,391,757 2,645,762 3,187,330 37,142,6962 40. Grand Lake O' the New Work Cherokees, OK Approp. - - - - 52,126 Cost - - - - 52,126 Maint. Approp. 9,000 5,500 1,800 - 100 226,408 Cost 10,933 4,222 1,877 1,590 226,064 41. Keystone Lake, OK New Work Approp. 45,000 - - - 123,171,173' Cost 21,000 23,500 - - 123,170,675' Maint. Approp. 2,197,000 2,148,600 2,953,264 2,681,300 30,127,8302 Cost 2,106,790 2,163,686 3,041,800 2,844,576 30,193,4832 19-12 TABLE 19-A (Continued) TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30,1986' 42. Lake Texoma (Denison New Work Dam), OK and TX Approp. 92,319 54,400 - - 68,168,9604 Cost 10,591 128,434 15,512 - 68,019,1094 Maint. Approp. 4,954,242 5,006,165 6,254,300 5,070,800 66,188,8482 Cost 3,943,331 5,444,478 6,640,360 5,433,240 66,204,6402 Minor Rehab. Approp. - - - - 46,237 Cost - - - - 46,237 43. Robert S. Kerr Lock New Work & Dam & Reservoir, OK Approp. - - - - 94,578,237 Cost - - - - 94,578,237 Maint. Approp. 2,114,832 2,234,200 2,562,400 2,452,000 31,299,8362 Cost 2,083,891 2,014,661 2,669,319 2,510,997 30,776,2422 44. Tenkiller Ferry New Work Lake, OK Approp. - -58,000 - - 24,017,7208 Cost 40,575 35,249 - - 24,057,7188 Maint. Approp. 2,508,500 2,194,416 2,392,800 2,927,600 30,055,7772 Cost 2,660,198 2,110,520 2,674,605 3,081,392 29,971,5512 45. Webbers Falls Lock New Work & Dam, OK Approp. - - - - 83,738,277 Cost - - - - 83,738,701 Maint. Approp. 2,933,256 1,869,900 2,282,026 3,561,800 32,119,064 ' Cost 3,530,602 2,252,816 2,445,589 3,867,890 32,194,8962 *These figures represent the total investment for the Tulsa 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 District in the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation special funds. System in Oklahoma. These values include all features of the 4. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange navigation system as listed in Section 1 of the text. Projects $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. which include power are also shown in their respective section 5. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 of this report. special funds. 1. Includes funds ($2,077,900) expended by the Jobs Act 6. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table Public Works acceleration funds. 19-M of the Fiscal Year 1985 Annual Report. 7. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 2. Beginning fiscal year 1984, data shown on Table A 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 includes special recreation use fees. Data for previous fiscal Public Works acceleration funds. years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. TABLE 19-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 1. July 24, 1946 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER HD 79-758, PL 525 NAVIGATION SYSTEM 3. December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 4. October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 5. October 23, 1962 6. October 23, 1962 ARCADIA LAKE Change water quality to water supply ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE HD 91-299 PL 94-587 SD 87-107 PL 89-789, SD 110 PL 91-611 HD 87-563 HD 87-563 19-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 See Section In Text 7. 31. December 30, 1963 32. June 28, 1938 July 30, 1983 37. July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 38. July 24, 1946 39. August 18,1941 July 24, 1946 40. August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 TABLE 19-B (Continued) 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. HD 75-569 Date of Authorizing Act June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 June 22, 1936 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 Section 201 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 19-14 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HULAH LAKE JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change KAW LAKE LAKE KEMP MARION, KS MARION LAKE OOLOGAH LAKE OPTIMA LAKE PAT MAYSE LAKE PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE Authorized name change PINE CREEK LAKE SARDIS LAKE Authorized name change SKIATOOK LAKE TORONTO LAKE WAURIKA LAKE WISTER LAKE Conservation pool elevation changed BROKEN BOW LAKE EUFAULA LAKE FORT GIBSON LAKE Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin GRAND LAKE O' THE CHEROKEES Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 HD 74-308 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 HD 74-308 HD 80-442 PL 85-327 HD 87-143 HD 87-144 HD 91-256 HD 80-442 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong, 1st Session HD 74-308 HD 88-71 HD 87-472 PL 95-265 HD 85-170 SD 87-145 PL 97-88 HD 87-563 HD 76-440 PL 77-228 SD 88-33 PL 88-253 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong, 1st Session PL 98-63 HD 85-170 SD 87-137 HD 79-758 HD 76-107 HD 76-107 PL 76-228 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 41. May 17, 1950 KEYSTONE LAKE SD 81-07 '42. LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) June 28, 1938 Flood control and power HD 75-541 October 17, 1940 Navigation and regulating flows PL 76-868 September 30, 1944 Authorized name PL 78-454 August 14, 1953 Water supply PL 83-273 43. July 24, 1946 ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 79-758 July 8, 1963 Authorized name change PL 88-62 44. June 28, 1938 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Committee Doc. No.1, 75th Cong, 1st Sess. June 24, 1946 Power HD 79-758 45. July 24, 1946 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 TABLE 19-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR Complete 1983 536,952 0 Red River from Fulton, AR, to Mouth of Washita River Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 TABLE 19-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta L.P.P., KS' Big Pine Lake, TX Boswell Lake, OK Cedar Point Lake, KS Cherry and Red Fork Creeks L.P.P., OK Cow Creek L.P.P., KS Crutcho Creek L.P.P., OK El Dorado L.P.P., KS Enid L.P.P., OK Flat Rock Creek, Tulsa, L.P.P., OK2 Florence L.P.P., KS Hutchinson L.P.P., KS Iola L.P.P., KS Jenks L.P.P., OK Lukfata Lake, OK Neodesha I:ake, KS Oklahoma City L.P.P., OK Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison Sand Creek L.P.P., KS Sand Lake, OK Shidler Lake, OK Towanda Lake, KS Tulsa/West Tulsa L.P.P., OK Complete Deferred Deferred Deferred Complete Deferred Deferred Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Inactive Complete Complete Complete Deferred Deferred Inactive Complete 1938 1984 1952 1980 1970 1971 1972 1977 1963 1975 1965 1956 1939 1950 1983 1952 1960 1953 1968 1963 1983 1981 1954 1,701,670 261,448 363,720 213,016 92,319 743,612 1,741,000 369,782 3,497,718 22,290 344,797 1,424,685 97,910 8,047,512 222,105 545,996 568,191 392,361 2,785,070 84,217 14,599 19-15 TABLE 19-B (Continued) TABLE 19-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Turtle Creek L.P.P., Yukon, OK Deferred 1975 144,853 - Tuskahoma Lake, OK Inactive 1963 - - West Branch Chisholm Creek L.P.P., KS Complete 1965 364,200 - Wichita and Valley Center L.P.P., KS Complete 1960 12,247,379 - Winfield L.P.P., KS' Complete 1937 - - L.P.P. - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. TABLE 19-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK' (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification Verdigris and Arkansas N/Al Fort Smith, AR, to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Lock and Dam 13, AR Arkansas 292.8 Fort Smith, AR Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. Navigation miles - McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. 2. As required for channel 9 feet deep. 19-16 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 34 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, OK Deep Fork River, OK Dodge City, KS Enid, OK Flat Rock Creek, OK Florence, KS Hutchinson, KS Iola, KS Jenks, OK Joe Creek, OK Larned, KS Marion, KS Oklahoma City, OK Park City, KS Sand Creek, Newton, KS South Deer Creek, OK Tulsa/West Tulsa, OK Wichita and Valley Center, KS December 1986 November 1984 December 1986 November 1986 December 1986 December 1986 May 1986 October 1985 October 1986 October 1985 December 1986 December 1986 November 1986 June 1986 December 1986 October 1986 October 1986 June 1986 TABLE 19-J FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS AND NON-CORPS PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Damages Prevented Cumulative Damages Name/Owner Fiscal Year 1986 Prevented CORPS PROJECTS Birch Lake, OK Broken Bow Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Copan Lake, OK Council Grove Lake, OK El Dorado Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Eufaula Lake, OK Fall River Lake, KS Fort Gibson Lake, OK Fort Supply Lake, OK Great Salt Plains Lake, OK Heyburn Lake, OK Hugo Lake, OK Hulah Lake, OK John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS Kaw Lake, OK Keystone Lake, OK Lake Kemp, TX Lake Texoma, OK and TX Marion Lake, KS Oologah Lake, OK Optima Lake, OK Pat Mayse Lake, TX Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS TABLE 19-I 1,070,000 177,000 42,000 7,281,000 1,899,000 929,000 2,076,000 141,000 2,561,000 308,000 47,000 2,155,000 620,000 482,000 11,280,000 8,867,000 10,686,000 28,292,000 24,000 4,619,000 6,074,000 4,000 162,000 4,000 5,570,000 15,223,000 6,755,000 21,255,000 16,759,000 1,137,000 40,952,000 46,102,000 33,590,000 34,391,000 3,111,000 15,401,000 7,001,000 7,574,000 95,879,000 73,235,000 24,973,000 127,678,000 3,153,000 63,276,000 35,986,000 57,008,000 11,000 4,030,000 67,000 19-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 19-J FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS (Continued) AND NON-CORPS PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Damages Prevented Cumulative Damages Name/Owner Fiscal Year 1986 Prevented CORPS PROJECTS (Continued) Pine Creek Lake, OK 1,015,000 11,127,000 Sardis Lake, OK 1,358,000 4,153,000 Skiatook Lake, OK 9,279,000 20,519,000 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK 140,000 12,167,000 Toronto Lake, KS 3,053,000 31,053,000 Waurika Lake, OK 648,000 16,265,000 Wister Lake, OK 6,956,000 72,362,000 NON-CORPS PROJECTS Altus Reservoir, OK 42,000 3,337,000 Bureau of Reclamation Arbuckle Reservoir, OK -426,000 Bureau of Reclamation Cheney Reservoir, KS 368,000 7,634,000 Bureau of Reclamation Fort Cobb Reservoir, OK 24,000 653,000 Bureau of Reclamation Foss Reservoir, OK -1,272,000 Bureau of Reclamation Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, OK 177,000 39,547,000 Grand River Dam Authority Lake Meredith, TX 4,000 10,000 Bureau of Reclamation Lake Hudson, OK 68,000 5,819,000 (Markham Ferry Reservoir) Grand River Dam Authority Mountain Park Reservior, OK 59,000 594,000 Bureau of Reclamation Norman Reservoir, OK 1,560,000 8,713,000 Bureau of Reclamation LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, OK - 1,500,000 Enid, OK - 2,532,000 Flat Rock Creek, OK - 1,000,000 Florence, KS - 7,397,000 Hutchinson, KS - 9,450,000 Iola, KS 5,160,000 11,357,000 Jenks, OK 610,000 1,736,000 Joe Creek, OK - 11,200,000 Marion, KS - Oklahoma City, OK - 11,845,000 Sand Creek, Newton, KS - 623,000 Tulsa and West Tulsa, OK 34,440,000 111,862,000 West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS - 4,000 Wichita and Valley Center, KS - 123,557,000 19-18 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 36 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Bird Creek, Skiatook, OK 7,500 Blackboy Creek, Tulsa, OK 41,628 Box Elder Creek, Apache, OK 32,263 Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK 107,411 East Cache St. Lawton, OK 5,399 Haikey Creek, Tulsa, OK 33,842 Kingfisher Creek, OK 27,614 Lamed, KS 0 Line Creek and Washita River 42,262 Little Wichita River, Clay County, TX 61,713 Main Branch Chisholm Creek, Park City, KS 0 Merkle Creek, Norman, OK 53,486 North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK 46,120 Squirrel Creek, North Canadian River, Shawnee, OK 52,224 Squirrel Hollow Creek, Sand Springs, OK 10,383 Stink/Driftwood Creeks, Burlington, OK 16,892 Tar Creek, Miami, OK 24,689 Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS 111,774 Whitewater River, Augusta, KS 7,500 TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 682,701 EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Baron Fork (Camp Egan), OK 14,114 Beaver Creek, Waurika (Pump Plant), OK 725 Camp Creek, Pawnee County, OK 16,568 County Bridge, Washita County, KS 77,196 County Bridge, Washita County, KS 75,062 Deer Creek, Custer County, OK 12,544 Gaines Creek, Pittsburg County, OK 1,125 Neosho River, Lyon County, KS 113,535 Salt Fork, Red River, Elmer, OK 502 Sewage Lagoon, Washita River, OK 6,563 Sugar Creek, Binger, OK 627 Washita River, Anadarko, OK 4,178 Washita River, Caddo County, OK 7,097 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 329,835 SNAGGING AND CLEARING Cottonwood Creek, Guthrie, OK 116 Little Caney River, Chautauqua County, OK 1,000 TOTAL SNAGGING AND CLEARING 1,116 FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, REHABILITATION Dutton Levee, Neosho County, KS 25,850 Edith Long Private Levee 8,233 Five Various Levees, OK and KS 4,398 Heath Allen and Rodolph Levee, KS 3,277 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa County, OK 425,409 Nation Private Levee, Neosho County, KS 6,422 Ray L. Jones Private Levee 2,781 Richard Jarvis Private Levee 9,498 Six Various Levees, OK and KS 11,899 Skinner Evers Long Private Levee 3,354 Tom Price Private Levee 6,054 Tulsa/West Tulsa Levee 804,890 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, REHABILITATION 1,312,063 19-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 19-L GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 46, 47, 48, and 49 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Navigation Studies Arkansas River and Tributaries Hydropower and Other, OK 7 Central Oklahoma Project .83,613 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS, to Tulsa, OK 422,362 Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK 33,061 Canadian River Basin, OK, TX, and NM 225,445 Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS and OK 288,844 Lake Texoma, OK and TX 100,634 Poteau River, OK 106 Red River Above Denison, TX and OK - 83 Verdigris River Basin 28,365 Verdigris River, KS and OK 4 Arkansas-Red River Basins Solar Energy Investigations 0 Comprehensive Studies Arkansas River and Tributaries, South Central-Southeast Areas, OK 416,755 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA, and OK 75,226 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA, and OK OM 395,797 Review of Authorized Projects Restudy of Deferred Projects Lukfata Lake, OK 21,542 Winfield, KS 160,501 Review of Completed Projects Hugo Lake, OK 113,111 Pine Creek Lake, OK 58,047 Review for Deauthorization Crutcho Creek, OK 8,868 El Dorado, West Branch, Walnut River, KS 3 Inventory of Dams - Special Investigations 23,896 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service 3,732 Bureau of Reclamation 4,974 Planning Assistance to States - Texas 20,744 Planning Assistance to States - Kansas 59,772 Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma 175,154 TOTAL SURVEYS 2,720,478 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 99,940 Technical Services General 199,253 Hydrologic Studies Storm Studies 5,844 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 305,037 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Local Protection Arkansas River, Great Bend to Tulsa, Halstead 42,904 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, McGrath Creek, TX 1,762 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 21,609 Mingo Creek, OK 674,823 Flood Control Reservoirs Parker Lake, OK 592,511 TOTAL CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 1,333,609 19-20 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-L (Continued) GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 46, 47, 48, and 49 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks, OK 786 Local Protection Great Bend, KS 159,658 Flood Control Reservoirs Douglass Lake, KS 229,944 TOTAL ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 390,387 19-21 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth)................20-2 Flood Control 2. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ........ 20-2 3. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS .......... 20-2 4. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE ............... ................. 20-2 5. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS..........20-3 6. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ....... 20-3 7. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO ..................... 20-3 8. Little Blue River Lakes, MO ............... 20-3 9. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, M O ............................... 20-4 10. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS ...................... 20-4 11. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS ......... 20-4 12. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE to Mouth) ........... 20-5 13. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ............ 20-5 14. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ....................... 20-5 15. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, M O ................................ 20-5 16. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS ............................... 20-6 17. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA............ 20-6 18. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ...... 20-6 19. Tattle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ....... 20-6 20. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS .............. 20-7 21. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations......................20-7 Flood Control (cont.) Page 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects..........................20-7 23. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ........... 20-7 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................ 20-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ......................... 20-8 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO .............. 20-9 General Investigations 27. General Investigations.....................20-9 27A. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO ............ 20-9 Tables Table 20-A Cost & Financial Statement.........20-10 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 20-13 Table 20-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects..........................20-16 Table 20-D Not Applicable Table 20-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 20-17 Table 20-F Not Applicable Table 20-G Deauthorized Projects..............20-18 Table 20-H Missouri River Levee System ........ 20-18 Table 20-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program .................... 20-19 Table 20-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. .20-19 Table 20-K Active General Investigations ........ 20-20 Table 20-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............... 20-21 20-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the channel, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to the upper end of Rulo Bend, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of stage are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for FY 1986 is approximately 2.0 million. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract. In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps and dike and revetment repair, real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gauging, environmental studies and special working data, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. There was no dredging because no significant bars or shoals developed. Flood Control 2. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1986) is $162,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $22,200,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The city of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first channel contract is complete, and the second contract is nearing completion. Relocation contracts had been negotiated with four railroad companies and construction is underway. 3. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, Kansas, in Douglas County. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Exiting project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 1,305,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 4. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE 20-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, about 3 miles east of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. Project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 906,400 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included stilling basin repair and other ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 5. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 15 miles southwest of the Kansas City metropolitan area in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974 and project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction is $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $23,342,756 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities have been built. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 430,400 visitor days. Settlement of a dispute on the Miami County Road Relocation contract for design and construction of road relocations resulted in financial completion of this contract. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 6. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. IDam is on Smoky Hill River about 19 miles west and 16 miles south of Salina, Kansas, and about 205 river miles above mouth of stream. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. TIbtal Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 585,300 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included drain installation, construction of administration building, replacement of piezometer tubes, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, MO Location. The project is located along the Little Blue River and extends from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, 22 miles upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. The improvements consist of straightening and enlarging the Little Blue River channel from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, near Blue Mills Road, upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek, reducing the length of this section from 20.4 to about 15 miles. Alteration of six highway bridges and construction of five new highway bridges and one railroad bridge were required. Improvements in the vicinity of Lake City Army Ammunition Plant consists of diversion of West Fire Prairie Creek into the Little Blue River and construction of a levee. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1984) is $25,505,083 and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,390,000. Construction was initiated in December 1974. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies to the Little Blue River channel improvement works. Jackson County, Missouri, passed a bond issue for sponsorship of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished July 31, 1973. Operations during fiscal year. Project is physically complete, but not fiscally. 8. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on 20-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam will be an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Estimated Federal cost (1986) for both lakes through construction of the project is $138,900,000. Construction was initiated in September 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $15,050,000 of which $420,000 will be accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Longview Lake is essentially complete except for recreation facilities. Blue Springs dam, recreation facilities, and administrative facilities are underway. Project is 94 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. 9. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 1 mile west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity will be 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1986) is $20,503,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,797,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,588,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,797,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the city of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of city of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 588,400 visitor days. Design of Stage 4 recreation facilities was completed and contract awarded. Project is 97 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 2 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 819,400 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida and about 8 miles downstream from Milford, Geary County, Kansas, and about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River near Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total 20-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. Project was' placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,045,576 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 1,309,000 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included continuation of seismic reevaluation and ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated cost (1986) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $250,300,000, including $216,300,000 Federal and $34,000,000 non-Federal contributions. Costs of $25,600,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Cost estimate for deferred and inactive portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $253,558,000 (1964 price level), of which $233,412,000 is Federal cost for construction and $20,146,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Sponosor for Unit L 330-345 has optioned the major part of lands for rights-of-way. Because of anticipated changes as a result of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the District advised the sponsor to-suspend condemnation proceedings for remaining requirements pending development of an alternate plan. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 20-H on Missouri River levee system. Reconnaissance report for remedial work on L 246 was approved. Planning on remaining active units continued. 13. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, Kansas, about 3 miles north of Perry, Kansas Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 1,515,100 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included preparation of plans and specifications and award of contract for replacement of relief wells, removation of Slough Creek PUA, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 14. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation and Table 20-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 15. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Trre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 3 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed 20-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 1,318,700 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of modification of the administration building and ordinary operation and maintenance. 16. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 7 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet workes and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including supplemental recreational development $731,130 (Code 710), is $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $71,018. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 579,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 17. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of town of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished, and a supplement to the master plan has been approved recommending relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization affected by the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 941,600 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included renovation of relief wells, initiation of construction of Island View shower building, and ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 18. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1986) through construction of the project is $87,835,000. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 1,313,200 visitor days. Project is physically complete, but not financially complete. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 12 miles northwest of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. 20-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 958,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included boundary rectification and ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. 'btal Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961 and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 618,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after 'completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 20-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 23. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Non-Federal flood protection works constructed or rehabilitated under P.L. 84-99 must be inspected by the Corps of Engineers to assure compliance with local cooperation agreements. As of July 16, 1986, new maintenance guidelines were established which require the Corps to perform more extensive, geotechnical inspections than in the past. 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Operations for period October 1, 1985 thru September 30, 1986 were as follows: Disaster Preparedness Program, includes planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment and personnel. Flood Fighting and Rescue Work, for three flood events on the Missouri River and tributaries. A fourth event was declared on September 30, 1986 and terminated in November 1986. Rehabilitation of both non-Federal farm levees, and Federal authorized levees and control works damaged as a direct result of flooding. (See Table 20-L for costs.) Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1986. See Table L for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1986. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $500,000. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit. Projects that were physically complete in FY 85, but financially completed in FY 86 were as follows: (For detailed project descriptions, see FY 85 Annual Report.) North Fork Big Nemaha River, Elk Creek Sewage Lagoons, Johnson County, NE; South Fork Wolf River, County Bridge, Brown County, KS; Little Blue River, Gilead Bridge, Thayer County, NE. Projects that were physically complete in FY 86, but not financially complete in FY 86 were as follows: 20-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Nodaway River, Road T, Andrew County, MO - Construction was completed in December 1985 on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consisted of 2,450 feet of stone fill along the bank. The project was damaged by flooding in March 1985, and remedial measures to repair the structure should be completed in FY 87. Osage River, Road HH, Miller County, MO - Construction was completed in May 1986 on a project to protect a county road. The project consisted of a stone fill revetment with tieback dikes. Little Blue River, Overy Bridge, Clay County, NE - Construction was completed in September 1986 on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consisted of a concrete rubble revetment with tieback dikes. Little Blue River, Spring Ranch Bridge, Clay County, NE - Construction was completed in June 1986 on remedial repairs to the bank stabilization project. The project was damaged by flooding in August 1985. Repairs consisted of replacing stone removed by flood waters and repairing the damaged board fence dikes. The repaired project provides protection to a county road and bridge. Yankee Creek, West Tecumseh Bridge, Johnson County, NE - Construction was completed in July 1986 on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consisted of a concrete rubble revetment with tieback dikes. Yankee Creek, Vesta Bridge, Johnson County, NE - Construction was completed in July 1986 on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consisted of concrete rubble revetments with baffle dikes on both the left and right banks. Kimsey Creek, Casteel Bridge, Holt County, MO - Construction was completed in August 1986 on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consisted of a stone fill revetment with tieback dikes on the left bank. Nodaway River, Fillmore Bridge, Andrew and Holt Counties, MO - Construction was completed in September 1986 on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consisted of bank paving with a reinforced toe section on both the left and right banks. Big Blue River, Tuxedo Park Road and Bridge, Saline County, NE - Construction was coompleted in August 1986 on a project to protect a city park road and bridge. The project consisted of a concrete rubble revetment with tieback dikes on the left bank. Projects authorized for or under construction at the end of FY 86 were as follows: Beaver Creek, Br. 43430, Webster County, NE - Construction was underway on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill and should be completed in October 1986. Elm Creek, Br. 33425, Webster County, NE - Construction was underway on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill and should be completed in October 1986. Elm Creek, Br. 23015, Webster County, NE - Construction was underway on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill and should be completed in October 1986. Beaver Creek, Br. 23025, Webster County, NE - Construction was underway on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of concrete rubble bank paving on the left bank and concrete rubble fill on the right bank to protect the bridge abutments. Construction should be completed in October 1986. Beaver Creek, Br. 14710, Webster County, NE - Construction was underway on a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of concrete rubble bank paving and should be completed in October 1986. Wakarusa River, Baldwin City Waterline, Douglas County, KS - Construction was authorized for a project to protect a city waterline. The project consists of a sheet pile wall, stone drains, and riprap to provide erosion protection. Construction should be completed by March 1987. Turkey Creek, Br. 123, Fillmore County, NE - Construction was authorized for a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble revetment with tieback dikes. Construction should be completed by February 1987. ITurkey Creek, Br. 385, Fillmore County, NE - Construction was authorized for a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of a revetment with baffle dikes and should be completed by February 1987. Little Blue River, FAS Road 1108, Marshall County, KS Construction was authorized for a project to protect a county road from flood-caused erosion. The project consists of a stone fill revetment with baffle dikes and should be completed by February 1987. Little Blue River, Pauline Bridge, Adams County, NE Construction was authorized for a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill and a windrow revetment on the right bank. Construction should be completed by January 1987. Little Blue River, Pimpel Bridge, Adams County, NE Construction was authorized for a project to protect a county road and bridge. The project consists of 450 linear feet of concrete rubble revetment with baffle dikes and should be completed by January 1987. See Table L for listing of Emergency Bank Protection expenditures during FY 1986. Multiple Pupose Projects Inclu ing Power 25. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. 20-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Existing Project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway section and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with total capacity of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1986) is $550 million. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including paving the top of the dam roadway. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on 22 December 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing required remedial design on the bearing. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1986, power generation totaled 1,769,721,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $18,937,355 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 2,753,700 visitor days. Work was continued on acquisition of land and rights-of-way; relocation of utilities and municipal facilities; construction of the powerplant; and construction of public use facilities. Construction of measures to protect downstream areas from power operation were completed. Project is 95 percent complete During FY 1986, 337,271,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of design and award of contract for repair of turbine blade and ordinary operation and maintenance. 26. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 2 miles east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 892,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,721,000. Estimated cost of the project, including $3,785,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,008,057 (1986). Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Rightof- way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend has been acquired, and construction has been completed. Remaining work consisting of completing acquisition of the sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills is underway. Completion will assure downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 cf.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1986, power generation totaled 790,244,800 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $15,886,644 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1986 was 1,871,000 visitor days. The project is complete and in operational status. Acquisition of sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills was continued. The net amount of power marketed with Southwestern Power Administration was 67,817,000 kilowatt-hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. General Investigations 27. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1986 costs totaled $1,495,950 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 20-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Continuation of Planning and Engineering, Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Advance Engineering and Design. 27A. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO The project is along Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, from just downstream of Roanoke Parkway for a distance of approximately 7,500 feet downstream to a point just below Troost Avenue. The plan of improvement consists of deepening the Brush Creek channel bottom in this reach by an average of 5 feet. Estimated Federal cost of the project (1986) is $12,600,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $4,170,000. The City of Kansas City, Missouri provided a letter of assurance dated June 20, 1986 stating its intent and ability to cost share the project. Preconstruction planning is underway. 20-9 TABLE 20-A See Section in Text Project Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 2. Blue River Channel Kansas City, MO Blue River Channel (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Funds) . 3. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 4. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 5. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 6. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. 20-10 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: * Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 - - - - 237,942,190' - - - - 237,942,190' 6,098,600 5,045,700 6,757,700 6,452,000 269,946,2142 6,380,386 5,044,483 6,827,686 6,489,931 269,946,2142 - - - - 816,190 - - - - 816,190 - - - - 22,642 - - - - 22,642 - - - - 238,758,3803 - - - - 238,758,3803 6,098,600 5,045,700 6,757,700 - 263,516,8564 6,380,386 5,044,483 6,827,686 - 263,478,9254 8,200,000 -2,225,000 2,028,000 6,052,000 17,800,171 170,989 1,255,250 6,563,575 6,123,287 11,794,985 - 70,000 - - 70,000 - - 27,162 7,073 34,235 8,200,000 -2,155,000 2,028,000 6,052,000 17,870,171 170,989 1,255,250 6,590,737 6,130,360 17,829,220 - -106,100 - - 57,415,433 540,171 148,626 - - 57,415,433 1,114,900 1,310,500 1,104,500 1,237,000 7,483,300 1,112,529 1,315,435 1,104,848 1,237,034 7,483,300 - - - - 118,805 - - - - 118,805 - - - - 57,534,238 540,171 - - - 57,534,238 -26,000 -8,000 - - 47,111,9265 98,058 0 - - 47,111,926 1,594,000 1,077,100 1,246,400 1,249,000 17,211,4617 1,572,440 1,114,088 1,247,941 1,230,196 17,211,4617 - - - - 1,017,623 - - - - 1,017,623 1,900,000 39,600 - 140,000 64,161,400 2,115,958 203,412 14,766 140,000 64,161,400 445,300 669,100 585,600 611,000 2,660,500 445,047 669,879 585,618 611,096 2,660,500 - - - - 12,577,2276 4 - - - 12,577,2276 1,533,400 1,069,800 1,452,400 1,696,000 13,978,010 1,530,989 1,075,270 1,427,289 1,723,084 13,978,010 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 7. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO 8. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 9. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 10. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 11. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 12. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 13. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 15. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 16. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 667,000 562,410 55,000 25,505,083 128,044 25,443,249 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 130,859,200 130,805,693 1,187,500 1,017,025 132,046,700 131,822,718 17,806,177 17,804,744 2,953,500 2,953,500 1,125,1348 633,5919 18,931,31110 18,438,3359 37,436,530 37,436,530 17,795,000 18,471,209 268,645 17,500,000 18,176,209 275,000 328,345 433,100 431,597 -4,682 6,056 270,318 334,401 1,151,300 1,153,735 26,000 10,995 1,193,300 1,201,212 320,000 569,816 -26,000 1,533,000 1,576,795 49,095,918 49,095,918 17,643,484 17,643,484 17,365,452 17,365,452 16,588,512 16,588,512 14,003,238 14,003,238 13,976,333 13,976,3337 2,300,000 3,258,000 4,095,833 3,287,641 1,046,000 11,356,760 1,046,062 11,356,760 - 49,566,492 - 49,566,492 1,273,000 15,541,5247 1,273,091 15,540,5247 583,000 56,885,851 583,031 56,885,248 13,085,000 12,600,000 15,720,359 11,917,433 264,070 96,113 13,085,000 12,600,000 15,984,429 12,013,546 -29,400 150,000 80,574 121,143 413,000 567,800 415,036 567,851 108,750 -20,074 79,350 60,500 1,361,900 1,364,012 15,805 1,399,800 1,405,505 196,000 209,080 1,734,000 1,874,900 1,723,160 1,888,451 - 15,000 - 15,000 1,630,600 1,578,400 1,621,547 1,589,591 265 1,304,000 1,296,852 1,818,200 1,830,355 98,799 150,000 219,942 1,532,000 1,533,795 1,396,400 1,397,076 512,000 516,711 2,419,500 2,376,085 1,429,500 1,453,000 1,428,495 1,454,098 1,038,200 1,039,549 1,058,000 1,058,022 20-11 6,371,000 7,060,777 30,721 6,371,000 7,091,498 48,721 503,000 503,029 484,612 59,520 484,612 108,241 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEER, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 17. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 18. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 19. Tuttle Creek Lake Blg Blue River, KS 20. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 21. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 23. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees 25. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO Total Cost to Funding FY 83 FY 84 ;FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,198,900 1,194,485 1,257,600 1,246,720 149,000 149,401 300,000 299,731 73,000 72,999 14,923,000 12,929,266 3,834,200 3,836,394 2,820,000 1,276,067 1,786,300 1,789,410 -15,000 336,702 1,898,500 2,203,430 1,193,000 924,469 1,080,500 1,081,351 2,541,300 1,609,500 2,503,486 1,627,595 - -33,000 774,661 370,426 879,000 987,000 875,127 990,924 1,539,900 1,476,700 1,375,000 1,546,437 1,477,840 1,376,718 995,300 1,012,121 161,700 162,014 338,100 338,301 95,000 94,997 12,425,000 16,710,978 4,039,900 4,061,256 -269,000 855,969 2,690,900 2,699,062 1,109,900 1,110,138 173,000 174,032 365,000 364,917 153,000 152,458 9,200,000 8,860,644 4,859,300 4,870,785 105,000 132,582 1,876,800 1,868,147 1,458,000 1,239,997 195,160 195,160 350,340 350,490 138,000 138,546 3,093,000 3,563,417 5,136,000 5,133,990 73,000 451,361 1,830,000 1,839,804 441,000 101,859 2,019,300 1,734,316 357,877 1,476,459 584,800 589,584 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes $8,665,594 for new work for previous project and $816,190 from contributed funds. 4. Includes $738,190 for maintenance of previous project, $22,642 from contributed funds and $200,000 Fiscal Year 1968 Supplemental Appropriation Funds. 5. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $7,885. 7. Reflects $10 expenditure of undelivered order after close of 1978 cost records. 8. Correct total is $1,138,370, which includes $43,771 interest during construction. Correction pending. 9. Unable to verify. 10. Correct amount is $18,944,547. 20-12 27,622,159 27,622,159 16,437,718 16,417,936 87,618,315 87,612,620 5,097,000 5,097,000 80,584,079 80,584,079 15,738,779 15,738,779 20,463,367 20,463,367 11,825,046 11,606,996 5,014,483 5,014,483 3,993,415 3,993,415 459,000 459,000 524,582,900 524,538,202 25,853,200 25,850,090 79,731,357 79,700,239 21,168,300 21,165,170 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) 1. Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a mimimum width of 200 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. 20-13 H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62. H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70. P.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., P.L. 228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. EP.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., EL. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., EL. 228. 2. 3. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Does. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Docs. 642 and 5491, 83rd Cong. 20-14 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 2, 1956 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution on general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion and partial accomplishment. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 5491, 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. 20-15 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong., Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican P.L. 228. River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 20. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. Jul. 14, 19602 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecu- S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., tion of general comprehensive plan for Missouri P.L. 645. River Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 25. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 P.L. 780. additional expenditure. Oct. 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in 1962 Flood Control Act, accordance with recommendations of the Chief of H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an P.L. 87-874. estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 26. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 P.L. 780. additional expenditure. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO 1, 2 Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Kansas River Navigation Inactive 1980 259,900 - Osage River, MO, lock and dam3 Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status. 20-16 TABLE 20-E KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS' Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Big Blue River, Seward, NE 1' Big Stranger Creek, KS' Blue River Basin, Vicinity of Kansas City 4 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)2 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO East Muddy Creek, MO Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS 3 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS5 Lower Grand River, MO Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River at New Haven, MO' Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Highway Relocation) Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Town Relocation) Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE' Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS Topeka, Kansas River, KS Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO Upper Grand River, MO Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Active Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Inactive Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive 1965 1973 1953 1974 1984 1966 1976 1977 1973 1974 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1977 1984 1976 1950 1984 1980 1985 1966 1967 1976 1971 1982 1973 1966 1976 1976 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1976 1974 1966 1966 1976 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 451,400 692,706 8,052,990 51,989 2.- 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 1,754,019 2,782,793 127,297 67,275 25,010,500 42,434,197 8,773,488 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,178.261 2,036,624 4,462,661 390,763 91,929 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 77,189 21,174,593 1,095,019 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork classified inactive. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost for inactive units, Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork. 3. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 4. Three lakes inactive and one lake deferred. 5. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 20-17 TABLE 20-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Arlington Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved $8,651 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE 1965 Flood Control Act approved 16,317 - September 3, 1954 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie 1973 Flood Control Act approved 71,466 - Creek, KS September 3, 1954 Hackleman Corners Lake, - Authorized by Flood Control Act - - Cedar Creek, MO approved September 3, 1954 Hays, Big Creek, KS' 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved 499,200 - October 27, 1965 Marysville, KS - Flood Control Act of September 3, 133,682 - 1954 Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS 1970 Flood Control Act approved 39,708 - September 3, 1954 Pioneer Lake, KS 1952 Flood Control Act approved 95,692 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved 8,548 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Conotrol Act approved December 2, 1944 1. A study of water supply and flood problems at Hays, KS, is being studied under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. TABLE 20-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 12 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 512-513 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4 Kimsey Holly Creek L 497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 L 476 Amazonia L. D. R 460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L 443-448 Halls L. D. R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L 400 Waldron L. D. L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R 351 Atherton L. D. L 330-345 Orrick L. D. L 319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L 15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 40.0 Complete-1958 Complete-1954 Complete-1970 Complete-1962 Complete-1955 Complete-1954 Complete-1956 Complete-1968 Complete-1967 Complete-1957 Complete-1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 Complete-1957 Planning underway Complete-1966 Planning underway Planning underway Complete-1983 Planning underway Detailed planning not initiated 20-18 TABLE 20-I ALIS1\I0tto Vl 1 1 1 &AL., AJADIBAB.; 1 KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 14 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Non-Federal Cost Cost Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS $ 1,099,350 $ 287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS 84,000,000 41,200,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS2 38,600,000 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 48,129,549 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO 550,000,000 133,341,000 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 64,021,400 21,091,814 Indianola, Republican River, NE 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 12,577,227 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 37,436,530 - Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization) 500,000 214,300 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 49,566,492 - Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth' 216,300,000 59,600,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 49,095,918 - Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 3 17,365,453 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS 14,003,238 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 80,902,057 17,391,000 Topeka, Kansas River, KS 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS 80,584,079 - Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 630,000 610,000 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) 500,000 214,300 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 20,463,367 - 1. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project is 2. 1969 Estimate. currently estimated to cost (1986) $48,443,000 Federal and 3. Active portion of project. Inactive portion of the proj- $4,458,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is current- ect for power modification is currently estimated to cost (1954) ly estimated to cost (1986) $184,969,000 Federal and $7,300,000. $15,688,000 non-Federal. TABLE 20-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 512-513, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, R 482, L 476, R 460-471, L 455, L 443-448, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351, L 246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Sep-Oct 86 Sep-Oct 86 Oct 86 Nov 86 Oct 86 Apr 86 Nov 86 20-19 TABLE 20-K REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 27 of Text) Item and CWIS Number SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, KS & MO - 12382 Kansas and Osage Rivers, Kansas - 12204 Osage River above Harry S. Truman - 14063 Republican River, NE & KS- 12383 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) Platte River and Little Platte River Channels, MO - 14160 Grove Lake Deauthorization Review - 77000 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 FERC Licensing - 53857 Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) - 51820 Missouri Basin States Association (183) - 53847 Planning Assistance to States (186) - 51850 & 14820 Technical Assistance for Streambank Erosion (188) - 51731 Subtotal Supplemental Preauthorization Studies (190) Wears Creek, Jefferson City, MO- 75299 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) - 82030/40 Hydrologic Studies (260) - 53820 TOTAL (Category 200) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category 400) Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (451) - 12319 TOTAL (Category 400) PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) None GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 20-20 Federal Cost FY 86 Totals By Categories $194,104 329,521 273,531 30,022 $827,178 $ 13,301 7,177 $ 20,478 $ 59,353 10,559 $ 69,912 $ 9,364 17,440 7,273 58,032 11,912 $104,021 $ 10,114 $1,031,703 $155,782 6,753 $ 162,535 $301,712 $301,712 $1,495,950 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 24 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage1 Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended) Rossville, Cross Creek, KS D $27,307 Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS D 134,062 Big Creek, Pleasant Hill, MO R 15,697 Davis Creek, Mound City, MO R 54,706 TOTAL $231,772 Emergency Bank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946, as Amended) North Fork Big Nemaha River, Elk Creek Sewage Lagoons, Johnson County, NE 0 $499 Little Blue River, Spring Ranch Bridge, Clay County, NE O 14,000 South Fork Wolf River, County Bridge, Brown County, KS O 5,752 Little Blue River, Gilead Bridge, Thayer County, NE O 9,423 Nodaway River, Road T, Andrew County, MO C 139,485 Osage River, Road HH, Miller County, MO C 50,599 Beaver Creek, Br. 43430, Webster County, NE C 8,501 Elm Creek, Br. 33425, Webster County, NE C 5,222 Elm Creek, Br. 23015, Webster County, NE C 15,253 Beaver Creek, Br. 23025, Webster County, NE C 3,341 Beaver Creek, Br. 14710, Webster County, NE C 12,442 Yankee Creek, West Tecumseh Bridge, Johnson County, NE C 19,309 Yankee Creek, Vesta Bridge, Johnson County, NE C 32,203 Kimsey Creek, Casteel Bridge, Holt County, MO C 29,203 Nodaway River, Fillmore Bridge, Andrew & Holt Counties, MO C 50,040 Big Blue River, Tuxedo Park Road & Bridge, Saline County, NE C 40,980 Wakarusa River, Baldwin City Waterline, Douglas County, KS C 19,290 Turkey Creek, Br. 123, Fillmore County, NE C 18,317 Turkey Creek, Br. 385, Fillmore County, NE C 13,843 Little Blue River, FAS Road 1108, Marshall County, KS C 21,291 Little Blue River, Overy Bridge, Adams County, NE C 33,871 Little Blue River, Pauline Bridge, Adams County, NE C 19,502 Little Blue River, Pimpel Bridge, Adams County, NE C 17,984 West Fork Grand River, Redding Bridge, Ringgold County, IA P 7,464 TOTAL FOR 24 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $587,814 12 studies were terminated in FY 1986, total $37,320 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $625,134 Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Flighting, and Resuce Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) Disaster Preparedness Program $234,251 Flood Fighting and Rescue Work 73,627 Rehabilitation 586,337 TOTAL $876,215 1. Stage: I = Initial Appraisal; R = Recon; D = DPS; P = P&S; C = Construction; O = Operational 20-21 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in drainage basin of Missouri River along main stem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE................. 2. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................ Flood Control 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO ................. 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND ............. 5. Chatfield Lake, CO ................... 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ............... 7. East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA ...................... 8. Fall River Basin, SD ............... 9. Great Falls, MT ..................... 10. Indian Creek at Emerson, IA .......... 11. Little Sioux River, IA ................ 12. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE ........... 13. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD ................... 14. Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND................. 15. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA ................. 16. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ............ 17. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, N E .......................... 18. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) ................ 19. Pipestem Lake, ND .................. 20. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE .......... 21. South Platte River Basin, CO .......... 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control W orks ...................... 23. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................. 24. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ................ Page Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, . 21-2 Missouri River Basin, SD ............ 26. Fort Peck Lake, MT ................... . 21-2 27. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD .............. . 21-2 28. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, . 21-2 Missouri River Basin, ND .............. . 21-2 29. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, . 21-3 Missouri River Basin, NE and SD ....... 30. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri . 21-3 River Basin, SD and ND ............... ..... 21-3 ..... 21-4 ..... 21-4 ..... 21-4 ..... 21-4 ..... 21-4 ..... 21-5 .21-5 .21-5 .21-5 .21-5 .21-6 .21-6 .21-6 ..... 21-6 ..... 21-6 ..... 21-6 Page .. 21-7 ... 21-7 .. 21-8 .. 21-8 .. 21-8 .. 21-9 Miscellaneous 31. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project ...... 21-9 32. National Emergency Preparedness .......... 21-9 General Investigations 33. See Table 21-K ...................... Tables .... 21-9 21-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 21-10 21-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 21-13 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 21-16 21-D Not Applicable 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.. 21-16 21-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ...................... 21-18 21-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 21-18 21-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ............. 21-18 21-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ...... 21-19 21-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects .................... 21-19 21-K Active General Investigations ........... 21-21 21-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............ 21-22 21-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. Work remaining to complete this section of the project consists of construction of fish and wildlife facilities. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Estimated total cost of new work Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE is $189,632,000 (1984), of which $188,045,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $1,587,000 is the non-Federal cost, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed for cost sharing on construction of recreation by constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities are included in the Missouri River Navigation Maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Federal costs for FY 1986 were $100,000 for dredging at the Sioux City Marina. Flood Control 3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. The total cost of construction was $61,503,600. Recreation facilities were developed utilizing cost sharing funds at an additional cost of $500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work by hired labor included miscellaneous items of ordinary repair and maintenance. Annual project visitation was estimated at 102,808. 4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 21-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on capacity of North Fork channel below reservoir; obtain water rights for storage; pay the United States for costs allocated to water supply; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved June 19, 1964. With respect to water rights, requirements have been complied with. A contract with the Bowman County Water Management District for water storage space was' signed November 10, 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation was estimated at 32,331. 5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet, a crest length of 12,500 feet, and a reservoir with flood control capacity 21-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps is participating with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 98 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1989. Construction is essentially complete at the project with the exception of the downstream channel improvement, associated recreation facilities and fish and wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $104,970,000 (1986) of which $95,000,000 is the Federal cost for construction, $7,070,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 is the local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. Operations during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Completed construction on Union Avenue Weir of the downstream channel improvements. Continued construction on Stage II of the downstream channel improvements and initiated construction on Stage III. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities, including seismic evaluation of the dam. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,083,577. 6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacify of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $15,285,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Recreational development was continued. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,526,653. 7. EAST NISHNABOTNA RIVER AT RED OAK, IA Location. On the East Nishnabotna River on the western edge of Red Oak in Montgomery County, IA. Existing Project. The work on the original project was initiated in April 1962 and completed in October 1962. The work consisted of 10,500 feet of levee along the west edge of Red Oak. The cost when completed (1962) was $443,000, of which $400,000 was Federal and $43,000 non-Federal. Flooding subsequent to completion of the project raised concerns about the adequacy of the project. A study was made and the recommendation to raise the existing project to standard project flood protection was approved February 1981. The cost of this work was $1,854,000, of which $1,754,000 was the Federal cost and $100,000 was the non-Federal cost for necessary rights of way and utility relocations. Local cooperation. A 221 contract to sponsor the project was furnished by the City of Red Oak and was approved on September 21, 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Project is financially complete. 8. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. (See Table 21-A for total cost of construction.) For last funding see FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. 21-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation was estimated for Cold Brook Lake and Cottonwood Springs Lake at 57,507 and 15,157 respectively. 9. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $14,067,000 of which $12,017,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $2,050,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition local interests must zone the unleveed portion of the flood channel through the damage area to preserve its capacity and to prevent further encroachments and contribute in cash $179,000 representing the estimated cost of replaced storm drainage facilities which will be incorporated into the closed conduit of the Watson Coulee Interceptor. West Great Falls Flood Control and Drainage District provided assurances on January 17, 1968. State Supreme Court decision on assessments required a change in state law, which was enacted in 1973. The final court ruling on compliance was made April 1, 1981, and the local sponsor was instructed to proceed toward project construction. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the Sun River left bank levees and channels contract and on O&M manuals. Initiated work on Sun River repair and mitigation planting. Engineering and design continued by hired labor. 10. INDIAN CREEK AT EMERSON, IA Location. The project is located in Mills County along the right bank of Indian Creek just east of the city of Emerson, Iowa. Existing project. This project consists of raising old Highway 34 and constructing a levee 180 feet long. This project provides protection to commercial and residential areas. Federal cost of the project was $333,000 (1986). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is responsible for all necessary rights-of-way and utility relocations. The city of Emerson, IA is the local sponsor. Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the local sponsor on June 24, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. O&M manuals were furnished to the local sponsor in March 1986. Project is financially complete. 11. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Location. The project is located in the lower portion of the Little Sioux River Basin in Harrison and Monona Counties, IA, near the confluence of the Little Sioux and Missouri Rivers. Previous Project. For details see page 646, Annual Report for 1970. Existing project. Construction of the original project was completed in June 1966. Sill No. 4 was identified as a design deficiency in a June 17, 1981 report by the Omaha District, approved by OCE. Based on that report, design studies for a permanent solution to the problem were completed. Estimated cost of the new work is $5,117,000 (1986). Local cooperation. The Little Sioux Inter-County Drainage District was sponsor of that portion of the original project where the remedial work is being accomplished. Remedial work was 100 percent Federally funded. Operations during fiscal year. Ice and debris accompanying high flows during the spring of 1986 caused extensive damage to the bed grade control structure (Sill No. 4) that was constructed during the winter of 1985 to correct a design deficiency of the original project. A contract for repairing the damage was advertised in September 1986. 12. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the City of Columbus in Platte County, NE. Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. The estimated cost of the construction is $4,345,000 (1986) of which $3,485,000 is the Federal cost, and $860,000 is non-Federal contributed funds - other, that provides for all necessary right of way, utility, and bridge relocations. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on Stage 2 and on O&M manuals. 13. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE, AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is 21-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT $21,100,000 (1986) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $100,000 is the non-Federal cost. (See Table 21-A for total costs.) Local cooperation. All construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local interests will be contacted as specific requirements are developed. A costsharing contract with the State of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 26, 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination with the State of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site, the City of Yankton, SD, for recreational development of Riverside Park, and the National Park Service continued. Efforts to identify additional separable elements which could be justified under current cost-sharing criteria continued. 14. MISSOURI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, ND Location. Along the channel of Missouri River between Garrison Dam and headwaters of Oahe Reservoir in North Dakota. Existing project. Consists of bank stabilization and rectification works required to stabilize banks of Missouri River in specific areas and prevent further loss of agricultural lands through erosion. Construction was initiated January 1965 and project is complete. The cost of this work was $9,683,000 (1986) of which $9,413,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $270,000 is the non-Federal cost for all lands, easements, and rights of way. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Contractor claim resolved. Project is financially complete. 15. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 21-A for total costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 16. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 21-H for status of active units). Construction was initiated on Levee Unit L-611-614 in September 1980 and is 98 percent complete. Construction of Unit R-616 was initiated in May 1983 and is essentially complete. Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $43,000,000 (1986) of which $38,400,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,600,000 local costs for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operations during fiscal year. Continued construction on Stage 1 Fish & Wildlife Facilities, drainage improvements and Stage 3 on Levee Unit L-611-614 and on Levee Unit R-616. Initiated work on Stage 2 Fish & Wildlife Facilities Levee Unit L-611-614. 17. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvement and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) December 1978 and Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) December 1979. Construction of the dam portions of Sites 18 and 20 are complete. Remaining work includes construction of recreational facilities at both sites. Estimated total costs for the project are $54,400,000 Federal funds with $3,618,000 non-Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Design for Sites 18 and 20 continued by hired labor. Construction continued at Sites 18 and 20. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at Sites 11 and 16. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,305,700. 18. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project 21-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 21-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 19. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 21-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement and to bear the first cost of associated improvements in the wildlife management area; pay, contribute in kind, or repay, with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 75,217. 20. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 21-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the completed levee and channel improvement part of the project. For the dams, local interests are required to operate and maintain the permanent pools for fish and wildlife conservation and assume all costs related to utilization of the permanent pools for recreational purposes and insure public access to the pools. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance activities included sedimentation and reservoir regulation studies, intermittent inspections of the dams and structures. Annual visitation to the system of dams was estimated at 4,268,560. 21. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 21-B for authorizing legislation). 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 21-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $277,285. Inspection of Non Federal flood protection works was initiated in FY 1984. The cost incurred for FY 1986 was $43,167. 23. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1986 were $273,069 and total costs to September 30, 1986 were $4,809,766. 24. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). 21-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Federal costs for FY 1986 were $297,387 for disaster preparedness and emergency operations, and $266,593 for repair and restoration. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). Stage II construction continued on Lost Creek at Columbus, NE. Work continued in preparation for the construction stage for projects on Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE; Platte River, Cedar Creek, NE; Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE; North Platte River, Casper, WY; and Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND. Indian Creek at Emerson, IA, and East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA, are now financially complete. Two negative Initial Appraisal Studies were submitted during FY 86 at a total cost of $14,700. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14,1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946). Operations under this heading were as follows: Construction was completed on two projects in Colorado along the South Platte River near Kersey and along the South Platte River near Merino, one project was completed in Iowa along the Big Sioux River in Plymouth County Site 2. One project was completed in South Dakota along the Vermillion River in Vermillion. Five projects were completed in Nebraska, along Redbird Creek in Holt County; Elk Creek near Jackson; Elm Creek in Decatur; Salt Creek at Lincoln; and Wigle Creek near Homer. Completed construction of stonefilled revetment along the Platte River near Hansen- Chris Lakes, Nebraska. O&M manuals were completed on Elm Creek fBroadway Bridge) Decatur, NE, Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO, Cache La Poudre River at Windsor, CO, Elk Creek near Jackson, NE Platte River, Hansen-Chris, NE, Redbird Creek, Holt County, NE, Salt Creek, Lincoln, NE, South Platte River, Kersey, CO, South Platte River, Platteville, CO, Wigle Creek, Homer, NE and Yellowstone River, MT. The following O&M manuals are currently underway: Big Sioux River, Harrisburg, IA, Big Sioux River (Site 2) Plymouth, IA, Blackbird Creek, Burt County, CO, Elk Creek, Willis, NE, Platte River, Ft. Lupton, CO, South Platte River, Weldona, CO, South Platte River, Goodrich, CO, South Platte River, Morgan, CO, Vermillion River Waste Water Treatment Plant, SD, Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD. The following projects were initiated: South Platte River near Goodrich, CO; Big Sioux River, Plymouth County, IA; South Platte River Wendona, CO; Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY; Blackbird Creek, Burt County, NE; South Creek, Martinsburg, NE; Elk Creek, Willis, NE; Big Sioux River, Harrisburg, SD; Platte River, Camp Ashland, NE. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 25. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,883,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple uses. During the period, 897,690,000 net kilowatt- hours of electricity were produced. Installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams continued. Initiated work on rehabilitation of rest rooms for the handicapped at tailrace area and replacement of water chillers at powerplant. Annual project visitation was estimated at 683,657. 26. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,909,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Initiated work on rehabilitation of 13.8 KV switchgear, rehabilitation of roof and gutters shaft area buildings and repair of bridge joints. Ownership of the town of Ft. Peck, MT, was transferred from Federal to local control during the year. Continued work on installation of a powerplant controller system for the six Missouri River dams, work on rehabilitation of 13.8 KV bussing and cables, rehabilitation of townsites streets and sidewalks and sewage system improvements. Fort Peck Lake was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 982,303,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 21-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Total cost of Operation and Maintenance during the period was $6,084,800, however, reimbursement from the Western Area Power Administration for the prorata share of Operation and Maintenance cost of the power plant, reimbursement for furnishing operator's village facilities, and property disposals reduced net cost to $3,310,400. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,061,201. 27. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet, a crest length of 10,700 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,574,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Generating facilities produced 1,742,596,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Continued work on installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams, protective coating power penstock #1, West Chamberlin erosion repair and painting transformers C & D. Initiated work on erosion repair upstream face of dam, American Creek- Ft. Randall bank protection, paint penstock and surge tank interior unit #5, rehabilitation of restrooms 3 & 6 for the handicapped, rehabilitation of HVAC, rehabilitation of the electrical distribution system, and rehabilitation of transformer bank B. Ownership of the town of Pickstown, SD, was transferred from Federal to local control during the year. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,715,462. 28. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 24,137,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 80,000 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000 including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except cost sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 2,149,259,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Continued work on installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams, rehabilitation of stator windings and turbine runner unit #1. Initiated work on voltage regulating equipment, painting surge tank interior unit #2, construction of maintenance facility, and rehabilitation of the restrooms at Camp Loop #1. Ownership of the town of Riverdale, ND, was transferred from Federal to local control during the year. Annual project visitation was estimated at 1,932,807. 29. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled-earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 504,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 33,333 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Project is providing its multiple purpose benefits for flood control, navigation, power, and other uses. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating units produced 765,812,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Continued work on installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams and rehabilitation of spillway gates and bulkheads. Initiated work on generator rewind, rehabilitation powerplant HVAC system, and replace restroom at South Cottonwood Campground. Annual project visitation was estimated at 3,404,543. 21-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT 30. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 245 feet, a crest length of 9,300 feet, and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,337,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 85,000 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Land acquisition is 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 2,472,264,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Installation of a power plant controller system on the Missouri River dams continued. Annual project visitation was estimated at 2,547,951. Miscellaneous 31. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Location. Along the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe, ND and between Fort Randall Dam and Sioux City, IA; along the Yellowstone River in Montana and North Dakota; and along undesignated rivers and streams in the Omaha District. Existing project. The project provides for development of new methods and techniques for bank protection. It consists of various experimental bank stabilization structures designed to stabilize the river banks and prevent further loss of land through erosion. Construction was initiated in November 1976 on the Missouri River between Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe and between Gavins Point Dam and Sioux City, IA. Construction was initiated in August 1978 on the Missouri River between Fort Randall Dam and Lewis & Clark Lake. Construction was initiated in October 1980 on the Yellowstone River between Intake, MT and the mouth. Construction has been completed at a total Federal cost of $17,485,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-9 of Fiscal Year 1983 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Project is financially complete. 32. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $322,174.92. 33. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal Year 1986 costs totaled $2,093,276 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 21-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Continuation of Planning and Engineering, Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Advance Engineering and Design. 21-9 TABLE 21-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Sioux City Marina 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA 8. Fall River Basin, SD 9. Great Falls, MT (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 10. Indian Creek, Emerson, IA i i 1 Total Thru Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 19 86 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,660 1,544,000 2,018,572 - - - 470,000 48,323 501,369 274,000 332,000 171,428 440,291 150,000 99,000 139,705 112,048 442,000 1,600,000 509,808 889,677 - 530,250 442,000 509,808 291,000 291,525 744,000 421,538 344,000 402,380 316,000 288,836 6,950,000 6,217,952 6,950,000 6,217,952 375,000 47,276 2,130,250 889,677 456,000 451,280 285,000 284,444 831,000 1,150,517 14,000 8,995 296,000 326,557 200,000 1,235,141 200,000 1,235,141 -42,000 228,337 2,330,000 1,7 2,306,324 1,81 - 1( - 1 1,073 261,000 2 258,363 2 168,000 168,693 2,022,000 2,573,718 150,980 492,748 2,172,980 3,066,466 625,000 623,240 -177,023 373,000 374,702 -3,000 13,792 253,000 260,565 92,375 129,600 221,975 50,506 1 1 2,5 1,8 5 3,1 2,0 74 7 4( 4C 22 8 5E 8 5E 30 3,045,000 2,569,622 21-10 - 189,225,9911 - 189,225,9911 92,000 103,923,419 14,990 103,918,761 00,000 100,000 00,000 100,000 - 62,003,600 17 62,003,600 27,000 1,592,000 25,407 1,583,196 - 4,372,174 - 4,372,174 27,000 1,670,043 26,115 1,668,704 84,000 93,182,700 92,138 92,294,429 61,000 1,242,230 54,129 646,877 45,000 94,424,930 46,267 92,941,306 48,000 3,049,800 52,420 3,044,829 53,000 15,285,364 55,464 15,216,249 34,000 5,426,511 32,689 5,423,046 - 2,154,016 861 2,154,016 - 5,538,432 - 5,538,432 87,000 3,065,141 88,506 3,064,280 25,000 12,017,1124 53,139 11,746,1834 - 308,600 - 308,600 25,000 12,325,7124 53,139 12,054,7834 - 333,000 6,881 333,000 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 11. Little Sioux River New Work: and Tributaries, IA Approp. Cost 12. Lost Creek, New Work: Columbus, NE Approp. Cost (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. Cost 13. Missouri National New Work: Recreational River Approp. NE & SD Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 14. Missouri River, New Work: Garrison Dam Approp. to Lake Oahe, ND Cost 15. Missouri River, New Work: Kenslers Bend, Approp. NE, to Sioux Cost City, IA Maint. Approp. Cost 16. Missouri River, New Work: Levees, IA, Approp. NE, KS'& MO Cost (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. Cost 17. Papillion Creek New Work: and Tributaries Approp. Lakes, NE Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19. Pipestem Lake, New Work: ND Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20. Salt Creek and New Work: Tributaries, NE Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22. Inspections of Maint. Completed Local Approp. Protection Projects Cost 22. Inspection of Maint. Non-Federal Levees Approp. Cost 250,000 245,482 1,300,000 1,165,133 128,300 392 1,428,300 1,165,525 8,957 35,650 30,000 29,873 4,233,000 2,581,157 38,810 4,271,810 2,581,157 7,230,000 4,786,701 209,000 187,375 1,300,000 1,291,413 1,367,000 703,300 5,000 1 ,37'7020 A 703 3,467,000 3,288,990 610,869 8,345 G,UUU ,300 619 - 20 3,698 - 200 - 32 2,883 40,000 37,996 495,000 1,269,792 495,000 1,269,792 3,655,000 6,943,608 198,000 205,100 332,000 310,000 261,478 375,541 13,539 495,000 493,631 202,000 203,197 27,000 26,099 10,045 457,000 444,306 311,000 276,596 46,000 46,094 176,247 294,000 547,369 - 294,000 ),214 547,369 ),000 136,000 215 95,984 ),000 352,000 ,073 511,978 - -28,000 - 35,562 34,000 36,231 1,462,000 3,076,518 38,810 1,462,000 3,115,328 2,428,000 2,524,245 306,000 312,244 345,000 349,945 5,302 537,000 549,826 183,000 232,834 44,000 44,525 39,000 38,585 287,000 218,155 287,000 218,155 1,627,000 1,610,484 473,000 469,039 271,000 269,506 213 390,000 387,776 278,000 277,285 43,000 43,167 21-11 20,499,920 20,485,051 3,484,518 3,429,857 147,300 22,231 3,631,818 3,452,088 756,800 696,784 552,000 544,051 9,413,000 9,413,000 11,294,414 11,294,414 4,390,000 4,388,951 39,789,388 39,666,716 38,810 38,810 39,828,198 39,705,526 43,617,7625 43,572,1355 1,949,000 1,936,673 9,277,545 9,277,545 2,643,000 2,640,602 12,197,6222 12,197,6222 6,706,475 6,702,268 2,599,348 2,598,631 160,000 159,884 i i - 6 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30,1986 23. Scheduling Flood Ma Control Reservoir Operations 25. Big Bend Dam- Nei Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD Ma 26. Fort Peck Lake, Nei MT Ma 27. Fort Randall Nei Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD Ma 28. Garrison Dam- Ne' Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND Ma (Federal Funds) Ma (Contributed Ma Funds) 29. Gavins Point Ne' Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Ma Basin, SD and NE 30. Oahe Dam-Lake Nei Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND Ma 31. Streambank Nei Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project int. Approp. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost int. Approp. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost int. Approp. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost int. Approp. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost int. Approp. Cost jor Rehab Approp. Cost jor Rehab Contrib. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost int. Approp. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost int. Approp. Cost w Work: Approp. Cost 222,000 209,000 220,935 208,870 59,000 59,000 3,669,400 3,304,557 243,000 243,000 268,000 269,355 274,000 273,069 4,810,976 4,809,766 33,000 -25,000 107,497,597 32,979 -24,979 107,497,597 3,066,000 3,420,000 3,667,000 3,396,128 3,482,368 3,642,938 - -22,000 145 1,694 -4,091 42,577,9743 42,524,2243 - 158,428,080 4,200 158,428,080 5,558,000 2,391,000 4,327,000 3,399,000 4,460,663 3,470,461 4,300,604 3,461,784 433,000 455,000 420,623 464,367 7,996,000 6,379,000 7,021,679 7,162,997 - 287,000 29,163 296,675 8,639,300 6,083,000 7,157,839 7,543,117 7,000 130,000 7,000 130,000 112,000 114,700 5,701,000 5,896,791 6 52,807,5543 52,777,5953 - 199,065,883 311 199,065,883 6,957,000 80,477,8523 6,925,109 80,325,6563 - 295,729,613 - 295,729,613 9,166,000 7,148,000 9,179,213 7,144,937 163,000 163,000 78,000 78,000 5,408,659 3,699,000 3,641,000 4,246,000 5,291,305 3,817,338 3,602,668 4,311,714 1,501,000 1,496,536 7,886,700 6,386,350 15,000 577,115 737,000 -308,000 746,523 -307,758 91,921,7003 91,828,7343 4,208,310 4,208,310 686,961 686,961 49,617,239 49,617,239 59,293,1503 59,265,3253 - 346,520,603 -2,892 346,517,696 7,723,000 8,119,000 7,149,000 9,237,595 8,062,707 7,283,549 31,073 -4,689 10,432 83,039,1453 82,975,1193 17,485,000 17,485,000 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 2. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 3. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 4. Includes $110,000 transferred to inactive portion for planning cost. 5. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 21-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 1. Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood Control Act of 1950 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 June 30, 1948 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Acts of 1955, 1965 June 30, 1948 Flood Control Act of 1954 June 30, 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Appropriation of $12 million authorized for H securmng a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend I (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1938, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux H City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. H I BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of S. metropolitan Denver, CO. I BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood control reservoir and water supply. H I CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements H to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. I CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. H P Completion of plan approved in Act of H Aug 18, 1941. P General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. H 1 F EAST NISHNABOTNA RIVER AT RED OAK, IA Levee and appurtenant structures on left bank of P1 the East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA. Section 205. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot H Springs, SD. P GREAT FALLS, MT Levees and channel improvement for local H protection. F F INDIAN CREEK AT EMERSON, IA Levee and channel improvement for local P1 protection - Section 205. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Correction of design deficiency. PI F LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local PI protection - Section 205. . Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 75-560 . Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. . Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 . Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 . Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 . Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 . Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 . Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 91 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 L 858, 80th Cong. . Doc. 655, 76th Cong. ?L 77-228 . Doc. 343, 85th Cong. ?L 85-500 ?L 89-298 L 858, 80th Cong. L 341, 80th Cong. ?L 83-780 L 858, 80th Cong. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri PL 95-625 River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. 21-13 4. 5. 6. 7. 10. 11. 12. 13. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Date of Authorizing Act See Section in Text 14. 15. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents MISSOURI RIVER, GARRISON DAM TO LAKE OAHE, ND Bank stabilization and rectification. H. Doc. 343, 85th Cong. PL 88-253 PL 90-843 MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Flood Control Act of 1968 June 28, 1938 Aqg 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City, IA to Kansas City, MO. Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth and provided for increased protection. AND MO. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing pro- H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. tection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. PL 90-485 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for Doc. 1, 75th Cong. initiation and partial accomplishment. PL 75-761 Modified general comprehensive plan to include H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on PL 77-228 Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution PL 86-645 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of PL 88-253 eneral comprehensive plan for Missouri River asin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution PL 89-042 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution PL 90-17 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 21-14 TABLE 21-B (Continued) Flood Control Acts of 1963, 1968 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 16. 17. 18. OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Dec 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 June 3, 1948 Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doe. 91-895 PL 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100. 91st Cong. PL 91-576 H. Doe. 91-23 and PL 91-611 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. PL 89-298 SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. control around Lincoln, NE. PL 85-500 SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for PL 81-516 initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. PL 90-17 Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan PL 90-843 Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. PL 91-282 Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. PI. 92-222 Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. PL 93-251 Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. PL 94-347 Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. PL 95-189 BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. D)oc. 475, S. I)oc. 2417, control and other purposes in the Missouri 78th Cong. PL 78-534 River Basin. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by II. I)oc. 238, 73rd Cong. Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was included in PL 73-409 Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a PL 75-529 hydroelectric powerplant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Modified authorization to provide for full multiple II. Doc. 475 and S. )ocs. 191 purpose operation. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 Payments to be made to school districts serving PL 80-586 project as reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) for pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. 21-15 19. 20. 21. 25. 26. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 27. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 control and other purposes in the Missouri and 247, 78th Cong. River Basin. PL 78-534 28. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, PWA 1968 control and other purposes in the Missouri 78th Cong. PL 78-534 River Basin. 29. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, control and other purposes in the Missouri 78th Cong. PL 78-534 River Basin. 30. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 control and other purposes in the Missouri and 247, 78th Cong. River Basin. PL 78-534 31. STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Mar 7, 1974 Experimental bank stabilization methods to PL 93-251 prevent losses due to erosion. TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1986 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582- TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Full Report Cost to September 30, 1986 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD1 Complete 1940 37,410 - Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 - Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE 2 Complete 1970 262,479 - Boulder Creek, Boulder, CO Inactive 1976 142,666 - Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 2 Complete 1974 293,016 - Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND2 Complete 1960 102,980- Buffalo, WY Inactive 1961 -- Castlewood Lake, Cherry Creek and Tributaries, CO Inactive 1943 - Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 Davids Creek Lake, IA (Act of 1968) Inactive 1972 21-16 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-E (Continued) Project Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD 2 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N.D. Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Forsyth, MT Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Gering Valley, NE Glasgow, MT Greybull, WY Havre, MT Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Hooper, NE2 Ida Grove, IA2 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Linton, ND 2 Little Papillion Creek, NE Little Nemaha River, NE Loup River, Columbus, NE 2 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD Lower Heart River, ND Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks 2 Mandan, Heart River, ND Marmarth, ND McCook Lake, SD Miles City, MT Missouri River, Aten, NE Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Mott, ND Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 2 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Norfolk,.NE Omaha, NE Pierce, NE Platte River Near Schuyler, NE 2 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Platte River and Tributaries, NE Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Saco, MT Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Sheridan, WY3 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT2 Sioux Falls, SD South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2 Waterloo, NE West Point, NE Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Status Complete Complete Active Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Deferred Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1981 1964 1978 1970 1950 1982 1971 1939 1960 1958 1954 1968 1972 1950 1973 1976 1973 1973 1966 1964 1967 1960 1960 1958 1956 1951 1945 1976 1948 1971 1954 1967 1948 1971 1980 1958 1978 1976 1951 1966 1957 1971 1970 1966 1960 Operation and Maintenance 234,839 676,916 169,498 147,627 578,791 99,370 1,000,000 236,000 3,400,504 5,903,640 296,597 74,940 257,398 1,538,269 1,004,000 67,793 184,380 2,618,809 25,747 5,288,707 457,582 237,883 149,596 230,294 5,633 - - 5,633 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Includes inactive segment. 21-17 Cost to September 30, 1986 Construction 3,000,000 400,000 616,639 11,556,667 255,177 435,000 5,989,663 16,832 248,507 1,825,881 50,216 326,667 522,344 3,643,111 1,000,000 1,961,173 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 21-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Full Report Cost to September 30, 1986 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 - Springfield, SD Water Intake Active - - - Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 - TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Authority Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Date Expended Expended Billings, MT 1976 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 75,000 - 23 Mar 81 Dayton, WY 1956 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 - - WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE 1952 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 - - WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Indian Creek Lake, IA 1969 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 135,000 - WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Morrison, Bear Creek, CO 1950 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 30,000 - WRDA Of 1974 5 Aug 77 Redwater River and 1966 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 1,000 - Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Shell Creek, NE 1962 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 71,000 - WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 208,000 - WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 TABLE 21-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE (See Section 16 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Under Construction L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Under Construction L627, L624, L561-550 Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Complete Comprehensive Restudy of Levee System Scheduled to Start 1988 21-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-I PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT1, 2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND1, 2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)1, 3 38,400,000 4,600,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe SD and ND1, 2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD1, 2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD1 ,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE1,2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2 13,516,000 - Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND1, 2 9,414,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO1,2 15,285,000 285,000 1 Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 3 Active portion of project. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Jun 86 Saco, Beaver Creek Jun 86 Havre, Milk River Aug 86 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Aug 86 Clyde Park, Shields River Jul85 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Jun 84 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Jun 84 West Glendive, Yellowstone River May 85 Vaughn, Sun River Jun 84 *Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Sep 85 *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge Inactive *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge Sep 85 *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge Inactive *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Inactive *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings Inactive *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, Near Billings Jun 84 *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber Jun 84 *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks Sep 85 *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo Sep 85 *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges Sep 85 *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges Sep 85 *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Inactive *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Sep 85 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Jun84 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Jun 84 *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Jun 84 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Aug 86 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Aug 86 Scranton, Buffalo Aug 86 21-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected South Dakota Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Jul86 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Aug 86 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 86 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Sep 86 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 85 *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Aug 84 *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre Jun 85 *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Sep 86 *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Sep 86 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 86 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Jun 85 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Jul86 *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Jul86 *South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver Aug 84 *Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins Jul86 *Cache La Poudre River, Windsor Jul86 *South Platte River, Kersey Jul86 *South Platte River, Merino Jul86 *South Platte River, Iliff Jul 86 *South Platte River, Platteville Jul86 *Big Thompson River, Johnstown Jul86 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Jul 86 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. Water and Sanitary District Jul86 Nebraska Omaha, Missouri River Sep 86 Waterloo, Elkhorn River May 86 West Point, Elkhorn River Apr 86 Pierce, Elkhorn River May86 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jul86 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jun 86 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Aug 86 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Jun 86 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Sep 86 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Aug 86 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Sep 86 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Aug 86 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Dec 85 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Feb 86 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Mar 86 Schuyler, Platte River May 86 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River May 86 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jun 86 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Dec 85 Macy, Blackbird Creek May 86 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries May 86 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek Jun 86 Columbus, Loup River Aug 86 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Sep 86 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River Aug 86 *Julian, Rock Creek Feb 86 *Muddy Creek near Syracuse Aug 86 21-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (Continued) (See Section 22 of Text) Location Month Inspected Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 86 *Shell Creek, County Road near Columbus Mar 86 *Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Apr 86 *Elm Creek, Burt County Feb 86 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Jul86 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Apr 86 Sioux City, Floyd River Sep 86 Hawarden, Dry Creek Apr 86 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Apr 86 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Jan 86 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Jan 86 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Jan 86 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Malvern Aug 86 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Hastings Aug 86 *East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex Sep 86 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Jun 86 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Sep 86 *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Sep 86 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Jan 86 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Mar 86 *East Fork tf Boyer River, Near Vail Mar 86 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Jan 86 Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Jul86 L601, Watkins Levee District Feb 86 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Feb 86 L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Feb 86 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Feb 86 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Feb 86 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Jan 86 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District Jun 86 L575, McKissock Island Levee District Jun 86 L575, Buchannan Levee District Jun 86 L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Apr 86 L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District Mar 86 R613, Sarpy Co. Soil & Water Cons. D. Sep 86 R562, Peru Levee District Mar 86 R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District Mar 86 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District Feb 86 R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 Apr 86 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Mar 86 *Denotes Section 14 Projects ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 21-K (See Section 33 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 86 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Platte River Basin, CO 151,748 Eastern SD and Upper Big Sioux River, SD, IA 294,389 Missouri River, SD, NE, ND, MT 507,575 Western Dakotas Region of SD 164,930 Subtotal 1,118,642 21-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 21-K (Continued) ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 33 of Text) Federal Cost Item FY 86 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Cannonball River at Mott, ND Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations FERC Licensing Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) Missouri River Basin Commission (183) Planning Assistance to States (186) Technical Assistance for Streambank Erosion (188) Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Hydrologic Studies (260) TOTAL (Category 200) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category Perry Creek, IA (450) Westerly Creek, CO (450) Gregory County Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Facility (460) TOTAL (Category 400) PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) None GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 20,114 51,061 6,435 77,610 5,303 15,659 9,065 69,881 258,954 358,862 201,819 4,745 Totals By Categories 1,555,114 206,564 400) 166,154 148,217 17,227 331,598 2,093,276 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-L (See Section 24 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Section 205: Indian Creek, Emerson, IA - Jobs Act C 6,881 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND D 70,283 Lost Creek, Columbus, NE C 547,369 North Platte River, Casper, WY R 12,393 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE P 85,307 Platte River, Cedar Creek, NE R 90,559 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, IA C 861 Lodgepole Creek, Sidney, NE D 2,610 2 Negative Appraisals 14,700 Total (Section 205) 830,963 21-22 - - - - - M - -- - - -- -- OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-L (See Section 24 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Section 14: Logan Creek, Bancroft, NE P 7,680 County Rd. Bridge, Elm Creek, Decatur, NE C 2,857 Blackbird Creek, Burt County, NE C 17,784 Elm Creek, Sec. 15, Burt County, NE C 1,263 Elm Creek, Sec. 16, Burt County, NE C 2,168 Elm Creek, Burt County, NE C 23,675 South Creek, Martinsburg, NE C 26,250 Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE - Jobs Act C 1,810 Waste Water Treatment Plant, Snyder, NE C 1,524 Shoshone River, Byron, WY - Jobs Act C 1,674 Big Sioux River, Plymouth County, IA - Sec. 4 C 57,968 Big Sioux River, Harrisburg, IA C 15,593 Big Sioux River, Sec. 32, IA C 34,011 Big Sioux River, Well House, SD C 7,500 Big Thompson River, Johnstown, CO C 6,027 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, CO C 9,051 Elk Creek, Jackson, NE C 30,025 Elk Creek, Willis, NE C 18,861 Elm Creek, Decatur, NE R 2,389 Platte River, Brady, NE C 5,941 Platte River, Camp Ashland, NE P 18,401 Platte River, Hansen Lake, NE C 46,186 Redbird Creek, Holt County, NE C 41,960 Salt Creek, Lincoln, NE C 41,714 Niobrara River (Carns Bridge), NE P 6,916 Platte River, Ft. Lupton, CO C 18,907 So. Platte River, Kersey, CO C 78,875 So. Platte River, Platteville, CO C 1,361 So. Platte River, Weldona, CO C 9,099 So. Platte River, Iliff, CO C 27,790 So. Platte River, Merino, CO C 34,350 So. Platte River, Balzac, CO P 3,868 So. Platte River, Goodrich, CO C 3,101 So. Platte River, Morgan County, CO C 7,592 Vermillion River, Waste Water Treatment Plant C 22,489 Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD C 142,876 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD P 32,735 West Papillion Creek, Douglas County, NE C 89,249 Wigle Creek, Homer, NE C 19,121 Yellowstone River, Glendive, MT C 8,950 Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY C 5,230 13 Negative Appraisals 83,300 Total (Section 14) $1,018,121 Total Continuing Authorities $1,849,084 R= Recon D=Detailed Project Study P= Plans & Specs C = Construction 21-23 OHIO RIVER * For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed stuctures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va., and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island and Hannibal locks and dam. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, Ky., and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup and Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine locks and dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal) Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland locks and dams and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ................................. 22-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River............ 22-4 Tables Table 22-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... 22-5 Table 22-B Authorizing Legislation............ 22-6 Table 22-C Not Applicable Table 22-D Not Applicable Table 22-E Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela rivers at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, Ill. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide a channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, Ky. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine locks and dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable Table 22-F Not Applicable Table 22-G Not Applicable Table 22-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project .......................... 22-6 Table 22-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River............. 22-6 Table 22-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ....................... 22-7 type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1200 feet at Smithland; 110 by 1,200 foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110 by 1200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, 22-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), exclusive of Gallipolis Locks and Dam reported under Kanawha River project is $1,778,840,999, estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968 for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Gallipolis Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935 Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and Dam, presently under construction; and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. Table 22-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing projects. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 21-I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 22-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in fiscal year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 22-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Upper lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber, were installed by hired labor in October 1981. Contract for Locks and Dams Rehabilitation, awarded October 15, 1981, was completed on November 9, 1984. Dam work included: placing stone erosion protection downstream of both back channel and main channel, structurally rehabilitating all 14 dam gates, painting of the service bridge on main channel dam and painting dam gates on the back channel. Lock work included: rehabilitation of the river chamber and land chamber including all lock machinery. Contract for modernizing electrical system of main and back channel dams, awarded August 6, 1984 for $1,543,000 is 99 percent complete. Contract for shotcrete repairs consisting of placing shotcrete coating, repairing damaged areas with reinforced shotcrete and repairing monolith joints on the lock walls with reinforced shotcrete, awarded on February 28, 1985, for $377,830 was completed on August 9, 1985. Contract for miscellaneous painting and sealing concrete surfaces, awarded April 17, 1985 for $289,270 is 99 percent complete. Expenditures during FY 1986 for real estate acquisition and coordination, construction, and engineering and design of remaining project was $1,170,291. Montgomery Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Contracts completed include: Fabrication of lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber for $1,049,132; upper guard wall cells for $856,468; emergency dam bulkheads for $329,631; fabrication of 56-foot lock miter gates for $344,519. Contract for installation of 56-foot lock miter gates and major rehabilitation of locks and dam, awarded on July 29, 1985 for $22,193,960 is 42 percent complete. Installation of 110-foot lock miter gates completed by hired labor. 22-2 OHIO RIVER Overall scheduled completion date is March 1989. Expenditures during FY 1986 for real estate coordination, construction, engineering and design of remaining project was $10,698,581. Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Gallipolis Lock and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for a single 1200-foot lock in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. During the fiscal year real estate acquisition, planning and preparation of plans and specifications for the initial construction contract continued. The total estimated cost of the project is $353,000,000, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent inland waterways trust fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. Fall of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 1981. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning, initiated in September 1983, was continued. Master Plan and Real Estate Design Memorandum is complete. $10,145. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract. $13,300. Newburgh Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for the extended warranty to the centralized remote control and surveillance system. $29,561. Uniontown Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract. $26,922. Smithland Locks and Dam: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 99 percent completion. Land acquisition is complete except for outstanding condemnation actions and acquisition of one recreation site. Final payment on the completed dam contract has not been made pending settlement of contractor's claim. One relocation contract for electric lines is being delayed for rights-of-way problems. Alteration to Rosiclare, IL drainage and water structures was completed. A contract for additional work on the Tainter Gates was completed. The construction of the Service Building addition was completed. Contracts for construction of recreation sites at Lock and Dam 50, KY and Dyer Creek, KY were completed. A contract for a recreational site at Blackburn, KY, Site 8 was advanced to 97 percent completion. Three contracts for recreation sites at Birdsville, KY, Site 2; Lusk Creek, IL, Site 4; and Caseyville, KY, Site 8A were awarded in October 1985, October 1985 and July 1986 respectively, and were advanced to 93 percent, 68 percent and 2 percent completion, respectively. Contracts for Demolition of Existing Buildings at Lock and Dam 50 and Paving over same were awarded in May 1986 and August 1986 and were advanced to 100 percent and 38 percent completion, respectively. Engineering and Design of remaining project features was continued: $2,308,886. Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction initiated in December 1967 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction initiated in December 1972 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Project is 97 percent complete. Contract for storage building was completed. Contract to restore dam pier No. 1 and lock structures was completed. A contract to repair the beartrap piers and dam sill was awarded in July 1985 and advanced to 67 percent completion. A contract to repair miter gates and piston was advanced to 96 percent completion. Engineering and design of remaining project features was continued: $312,305. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Project is 90 percent complete. A contract to reinforce and grout beartrap piers and install piston rods was awarded in August 1985 and advanced to 91 percent completion. A contract to construct a stone dike was awarded in August 1986 and advanced to 79 percent completion: $389,988. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Cost were $10,223,326 for Pittsburgh District, $11,429,459 for Huntington District and $11,152,024 for Louisville District. Dashields Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Feature Design Memorandum for Major Rehabilitation of Dashields Locks and Dam was completed on September 17, 1985. Contracts awarded includes: Installation of mooring cells, May 29, 1986, for $474,320, and riverbed exploration, September 23, 1986, for $83,440. Expenditures during FY 1986 for construction and engineering and design for rehabilitation project was $1,166,000. 22-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district the work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work, but in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also to permit movemment of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, Pa., to 80 feet at Cincinnati, Ohio, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, Ky. (head of falls), 53.8 feet at Evansville, Ind., and 59.5 feet at Cairo, Ill. (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16,160,000, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, Ind., authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954) is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 22-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927 authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong. 1st sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $899,331. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 86. Dredging by contract: Pittsburgh District - Contract in the amount of $483,721 was awarded on February 1, 1985 for approximately 171,100 cubic yards of dredging Dashields Pool, Neville Island Back Channel, PA was terminated for convenience to the government on March 21, 1986. Huntington District 597,797 cubic yards at $1,583,851 and Louisville District 1,007,084 cubic yards at $1,846,378. 22-4 OHIO RIVER TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 1. Construction of New Work Locks and Dams Approp. $2,350,759 $1,801,200 $1,814,000 $7,065,000 $1,390,719,7721 3 5 o1107 on Ohio River Cost 4,099,831 2,573,878 2,518,511 6,639,783 1,389,351,7421 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 Maint. Approp. 31,744,300 30,976,373 31,056,817 32,293,874 589,642,8342 4 19 Cost 30,311,071 30,961,371 33,742,851 32,804,809 589,086,6342 13 14 19 20 Rehab. Approp. 15,897,572 10,189,000 4,605,000 10,151,000 67,515,572 Cost 17,335,848 7,502,809 6,484,902 12,571,165 66,638,561 Rehab.(O&M) Approp. - - - 1,267,100 1,267,100 Cost - - - 1,166,100 1,166,100 2. Open Channel New Work Work, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 15,962,2608 Cost - - - - 15,962,2608 Maint. Approp. 4,440,300 5,265,000 5,029,763 4,508,800 108,617,2267 9 Cost 5,759,040 4,479,208 5,799,647 4,555,393 108,594,8327 9 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 944,649 Cost - - - - 944,649 1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3 Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5 Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. ' Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9 Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. to Includes $100,000 placed in FY 1971 Budget Reserve. 11 Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13 Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds and $1,759,812 Code 713 Funds. 18 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 20 Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 22-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. January 21, 1927 Construct ice piers as a part of project, with funds H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. July 3, 1930 Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near H. Doc., 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Evansville, Ind., and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. July 3, 1958 Act of March 3, 1827 modified to include maintenance H. Doc., 434, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of River slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River December 29, 1981 Act of December 29, 1981 established the 1,000 H.R. 2241, PL 97-137, Title II, acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conser- 95 Stat. 1710 vation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 TABLE 22-H (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular 1,296,954,567 548,124,917 67,804,661 1,912,884,145 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 - 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation - 3,039,789 - 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 - 254,578 Executive 1963 Total 1,301,627,5843 551,222,4721 2 67,804,661 1,920,654,717 1 Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 4 Includes $1,166,100 cost for O&M Rehabilitation. permanent indefinite appropriation. 2 Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes projects. of Table 22-A. 3 Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSES TABLE 22-I AT LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam F.E.R.C. License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas and Ohio Power Co. City of Vanceburg, of Indiana Electric Co. Kentucky Annual Charge $45,950.00 $95,000.00 $50,000.00 $227,900.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1986 $825,211.64 . $7,400,893.16 $285,673.00 $991,369.00 22-6 TABLE 224J OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 1 - Replaced 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced 10 - Replaced 11 - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV 12 - Replaced 13 - Replaced 14 - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 56 600 18.0 710.0 17.0' 4 12.98 Rock Rock and piles 100 360 15.5' ' 12.9' - $ 870,034 1921 43,218,551 '4 - 976,767 - - 1,144,588 110 600 56 360 10.0 692.0 13.4' 17.5' Rock 110 56 110 110 Rock 100 1929 600 360 17.5 682.0 16.0' 14.63 Rock and piles Rock and piles 100 1,200 600 20.5 664.5 7.0' 14.83 Rock Rock 100 110 1,200 110 600 21.0 644.0 17.0' 18.0' Rock 110 1,200 110 600 21.0 623.0 38.0 17.0 Rock 4,699,176 '4 .* - 1,071,472 - 1,080,132 - 1,123,442 1936 21,970,96214". - 1,075,000 - 1,167,456 1959 39,099,688 - 1,177,100 - 1,138,000 - 1,162,165 100 1968 56,623,946 - - - 1,166,104 - - - 1,222,389 - - - 1,133,371 Rock Rock 110 1,200 110 600 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 99 1972 87,648,953 - - - 1,180,478 - - - 1,275,532 100 1972 76,520,876 I TABLE 224 (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below Hogsett, WV Gallipolis Modernization - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 37.0 15.0' Rock and piles Rock 1,200 600 22.0 560.0 18.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 600 360 26.0 538.0 18.0 12.0 Rock Rock 1,200 600 30.0 515.0 18.0' 13.0 Rock Rock 1,200 600 30.0 485.0 18.0' 15.0 Rock Rock - - $ 1,362,591 - - 927,091 - - 1,213,848 - - 936,696 100 1968 62,591,255 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 98 1971 64,922,680 - - 1,187,542 - - 1,925,205 - - 1,307,241 100 19376 5,687,433 - - 2,015,601 - - 1,063,133 - - 1,088,802 - - 1,579,618 17 18 19 20 21 22 b 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 100 1962 57,464,191 1,359,231 2,951,216 1,937,166 3,437,057 74,188,216 100 1959 0 0 y 0 LTi z z TABLE 22-J (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Locik Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 35 - Replaced 36 - Replaced 37 - Replaced 38 - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN 39 - Replaced 40 - Eliminated 41 -- Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) 42 - Eliminated 43 - Replaced 44 - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 48 - Replaced 49 - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 50 - Replaced 51 - Replaced 918.5 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,200 49.0 12.0 600 37.0 420.0 19.0 11.0 360 19.0 11.0 1,200 25.0 383.0 38.0 13.0 600 1,200 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 110 1,200 110 600 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 110 1,200 110 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Rock N/A Rock Rock Rock Piles N/A Rock Rock 100 0 1963 N/A $ 1,894,942 3,704,535 1,297,924 2,857,040 63,019,403 2,222,448 7,658,134' 270,309 1008 1961 45,726,189' 99 1972 2,592,242 2,819,930 3,202,890 96,760,58810 - - 3,129,028 Pile 99 1975 104,478,082 4,415,526 3,062,710 3,325,964 Rock Rock Rock 99 1975 100,295,061 - - - 3,751,762 - - - 4,370,566 Rock 95 1980 272,411,332 TABLE 22-J (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 52 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL 110 600 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,205,066" 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, I1 110 1,200 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 (New lock) 53 962.6 10.8 miles above 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6' Pile Pile 100 1929 9,715,7732 Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles above 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile - 100 1982 38,570,920 Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City Lock and Dam - - - - - - - - - -1,539,470 1 mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL $1,447,942,193" ' Depths are on emergency dam foundation and are controlling depths. 4 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 3 Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. Land chamber. S River chamber. SRoller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. ' Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. e Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. 9 Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. ,1 Reflects reduction of $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. " Includes $8,743,319 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979. 12 Includes $4,305,105 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979. 13 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. See Section 1 of text. "1 Includes $37,356,786 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1980. 14* Includes $16,233,351 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1983. "**Includes $1,166,100 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1986 (O&M funds). ' Exclusive of $6,994,235 details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute $ 5,359,203 (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants and miscellaneous 966,232 Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam 668,800 TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 6,994,235 $1,457,156,403 C0 tI O ym O y x x NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Page General Investigations 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY ........ 23-2 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY ...... 23-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ........................... 23-4 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 23-4 Alteration of Bridges 5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ...... 23-4 Flood Control 6. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN .......... 23-4 7. Martins Fork Lake, KY .............. 23-5 8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY ......................... 23-5 9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY ......................... 23-5 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .... 23-6 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 23-6 12. Flood control work under special authorization ....................... 23-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN .......................... 23-6 14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ........................ 23-7 15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ................ 23-7 16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ......................... 23-7 17. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ................ 23-8 18. Surveys ............................ 23-8 19. Collection and study of basic data ...... 23-8 Tables Table 23-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 23-9 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 23-11 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 23-13 Table 23-D Not Applicable Table 23-E Table 23-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 23-13 Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Power ...................... 23-14 Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 23-14 Table 23-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principle Features ............. 23-15 Table 23-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions ................... 23-17 Table 23-J Table 23-K Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project ............... 23-18 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ...... 23-18 Table 23-L Reservoirs .................... 23-18 Table 23-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 23-19 Table 23-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 23-19 23-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Estimated cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,100,000 Federal funds and $102,966 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program (October 1986). (See table 23-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,904. Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 44 terminals on the Cumberland River (3 municipally owned and open for public use; 3 government owned facilities and 35 privately owned facilities). A total of 23 terminals have 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals, and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Below Nashville: Recreation facilities provided at Cheatham project under (Code 713) cost $538. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements at Barkley included dredging at Eddy Creek Bend and completion of paving at Bumpus Mills, Eddyville and Coleman Bridge Recreation Areas, and painting at the Lock and Dam. A new lock lighting system was installed at Cheatham and dredging below Old Hickory continued. Painting of the spillway gates at Cordell Hull was completed, and a new utility system and paving was accomplished at the Nashville Repair Station, Old Hickory Lock and Dam. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (478,334,092 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (151,861,360 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (244,190,849 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (332,521,980 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 23-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 154 terminals on the Tennessee River (7 municipally owned, 17 government owned facilities and 130 privately owned facilities). A total of 78 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $266,435. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major repairs were 23-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 made to Kentucky Lock and Pickwick Auxiliary Lock. In addition other major maintenance items were completed including construction of new shop buildings at Kentucky Lock and Nickajack and painting at various sites. See table 23-J for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $749,000,000. (See 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the Resource Management Office, Erosion Control and Wildlife Planting. In addition, $5,000,000 was received from Corps surplus funds to initiate design and construction of deferred recreation. Contracts were awarded for Natchez Trace, Piney Grove and Crows Neck Sites. In addition a claim was settled on the BS L&D contract. The project is 99% complete. Navigation features are 100% complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $104,535 was expended for a study of Port of Florence, AL., $43,157 for Tennessee River at Calvert City, TN., and $69,908 for Tennessee River at Morgan City Port, AL. Alteration of Bridges 5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KY AND TN Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area will be established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 as amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT $103,522,000. The National Park Service will operate and maintain the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction of basic facilities by the Corps of Engineers. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. The project is 87% complete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 2,757.81 acres fee. Construction continued on the Blue Heron Overlook, Access, Recreation and Campground, and the Bandy Creek Road and Recreation. In addition, a contract was awarded to provide Area Signs for the park. 7. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acrefeet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will prevent major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Ky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower 23-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan, Ky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is currentby being formulated. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Work on the Barbourville Cutoff was completed. Construction on the Pineville Levee and Pump Station continued and a contract was awarded for the Pineville Floodwall and Highway. Acquired 8.92 acres fee at Pineville. The project is 34% complete. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $20,224. Total cost to September 30, 1985 was $272,138. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for fiscal year were $174,625 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal inter- 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT ruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Major maintenance work items were line surveys and property line marking, and repairing roadway expansion joints. Total net energy generated (196,021,800 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. 14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (58,921,700 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Major accomplishments were replacement of oil circuit breakers, completion of Washhouse and Fish Cleaning Station and paving at Horse Creek, Lillydale and Wolf River. 15. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (41,087,900 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Contract for paving parking areas and road was completed. 16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky. water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system 23-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed this FY. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was completed for Resource Management Office. Forest Service completed work on recreation sites under agreement. The project is 100% complete. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (37,827,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. 17. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for publicuse and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,372 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Recreation Facilities under code 711 cost $9,190. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Major repairs to the generator turbines, switchyard oil circuit breakers and generator coolers were completed. Updating of the sanitary facilities at Kendall Recreation Site was also completed. Total net energy generated 492,011,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $1,570,948 for which $883,537 was for navigation, $582,880 for flood damage prevention studies, $57,048 for special investigations, and $47,483 for coordination studies with other agencies. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $47,788 for technical services to others, and $41,254 for flood plain management services, totalling $89,042. 23-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 466,319 417,163 14,079,949 13,918,143 7,153,000 7,004,232 .- 65,516,000 65,822,382 10,975,000 10,731,095 100,000 64,253 491,000 500,189 39,000 36,553 8,270,000 2,854,007 146,947 8,767 3,605,000 3,268,063 365,441 30,437 2,988,000 2,828,213 - 6,907 3,902 1,985,000 1,959,925 2,170,000 2,522,143 773,000 716,769 929,000 523,103 14,670,200 15,494,335 6,848,500 6,978,158 25,000,000 17,837,084 10,300,000 9,432,902 - 50,000 244 406,000 401,981 22,000 27,384 4,000,000 8,286,077 9,000 153,247 3,790,000 4,078,470 30,000 341,796 2,554,000 2,732,605 3,810 2,290,500 2,173,573 545,000 379,374 771,000 828,369 - 7,800 722,194 18,453,000 18,461,695 9,855,000 9,755,161 19,755,000 27,688,233 8,405,000 9,183,262 545,000 523,757 65,000 60,309 13,684,000 14,504,087 2,209 3,198,000 3,195,628 - 17,700 5,509 3,180,000 2,966,610 471 2,553,000 2,489,352 219,221 864,000 840,428 538 18,496,000 18,448,409 16,900,000 16,908,385 11,405,000 6,844,558 10,231,765 10,105,683 -- 6,765 -6,765 480,000 507,448 27,000 28,020 11,840,000 12,317,354 2,820,000 2,853,975 .-. 3,007,000 3,101,316 2,353,000 2,497,915 58,000 141,682 886,000 883,590 23-9 320,252,240 1,2,8 320,176,653 1,2,4 180,485,676 5 179,501,301 6 16,251,428 7 16,251,428 7 118,387,951 8 118,033,208 9 400,000 400,000 736,160,050 730,302,532 91,290,920 10 90,346,207 11 20,479,911 20,479,911 3,230,000 3,215,079 817,830 12 817,830 s12 1,722,844 1,715,473 42,494,000 13 41,102,962 14 66,642 66,642 53,412,022 15 53,412,022 16 40,017,967 17 39,935,858 18 28,317,746 19 28,317,746 20 39,031,807 21 38,890,841 22 56,914,039 28 56,914,039 24 25,115,586 25 25,019,927 26 56,741,232 56,741,232 6,043,000 6,003,252 REPORT OF THE 'CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - 28,051 - 12,300 77,800 - 83,267,958 27 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 13,994 2,615 79,000 9,190 83,267,958 27 Maint. Approp. 3,059,000 3,894,000 5,360,000 4,847,000 55,346,441 28 Cost 2,858,455 4,097,459 5,066,321 5,055,966 55,153,595 29 Rehab. Approp. - - 35,000 - - 104,999,237 80 Cost 22,686 7,249 - - 104,999,237 3o 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by Metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $32,040 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $1,601,079 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees and $1,601,079 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 7. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 12. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 13. Includes $6,470,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $5,336,932 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $35.896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $131,900 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $131,900 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $131,900 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $131,900 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $75,400 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $75,400 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $131,900 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $131,900 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION ee Section Date of 1Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Jul 13, 1892 Provision made for lock A Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Sep 3, 1954 Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation--only structures. Jul 14, 1960 Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Aug 5, 1886 Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Mar 2, 1907 Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Mar 2, 1919 Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 1934 2 Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Jul 24, 1946 Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 23-11 TABLE 23-B S. in 1. 1. Oct 1, 1980 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. May 17, 1950 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Mar 7, 1974 Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-12 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 3. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) Project Caney Fork River, TN Clinch River, TN and VA Duck River, TN Elk River, AL and TN French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Hiwassee River, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN Status abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned For last Full Report see Annual Report 1895 1923 1887 1904 1931 1923 1911 1888 1887 1884 Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Operation and Construction $ 27,828 53,949 13,000 4,000 249,605 113,311 5,714 5,510 11,500 5,000 -. ^Am Maintenance $ 7,873 33,554 9,754 Soutn For of C umberlana River, KY abandoned 189211,967 - TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 - Chattanooga, TN and Rossville, GA completed 1949 180,997 - Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 - Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 - Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 - 1 Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY inactive - 6,779 - 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 23-13 i TABLE 23-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN beneficial use - $146,423,053 $56,759,870 1 Celina Dam, KY active -- 222,575 -- 1 Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 31,682,762 42,580,761 1 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 79,874,492 27,287,075 1 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use - 52,266,412 52,873,595 1 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY." See Table 23-H. TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Report see Funds Funds Project Annual Report for Date and Authority Expended Expended Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, 75 $111,855 - River Basin, TN Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. 23-14 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet)1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level) : Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet) : Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, KY, 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 s'4 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 385 382 7,450 19,800 7 84,200 104,000 Old Hickory, TN, 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 s 442 27,450 125,000 5 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, TN, 5 miles. 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 s 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 5,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 3 12,000 36,000 4 25,000 100,000 3 33,333 100,000 23-15 Celina, TN, 5 miles. 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 564 8 560 559 559 16,960 55,950 5 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 108,000 l ' TABLE 23-H (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Celina Cheatham Cordell Hull Old Hickory Percent of project completion 8 - 8 8s s Year opened to navigation 1964 - 1952 1973 1954 Estimated cost 9 $146,400,000 $213,000,000 $31,700,000 $79,874,500 $52,266,400 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acrefeet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 23-16 TABLE 23-I TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Cham- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened Cost of Above Miles from ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock Project 1 Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) of Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam Kentucky 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and 2 KY earthfill Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed Concrete and s TN earthfill Main lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 1984 Fixed Concrete and 8 TN earthfill Wilson: Auxiliary lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 60 292 94 100.0 11.0 11.2 Limestone 1927 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,540 5 AL 300 earthfill Main lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1959 - - 7 AL General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,295 AL earthfill Main lock 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete and AL earthfill Guntersville: Auxiliary lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed - S & 7 AL Main lock 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 1965 Fixed Concrete and AL earthfill Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1967 Fixed Concrete nooga, TN Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone Fixed Concrete nooga, TN Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chatta- 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 1939 Fixed 3 & T nooga, TN Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 1941 Fixed Concrete and s TN earthfill Fort Loudon 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 1943 Fixed Concrete and a TN earthfill Melton Hill 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1963 Fixed Concrete S (Clinch R.) TN 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916 (H. Doc. 1262, 64th Cong., 1st seas.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. z x1 v1 nj M h1r4 .-a REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 23-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP (See Section 2 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $7,235,104 $106,781,259 $116,260,599 1,2 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, - 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $7,235,109 $106,792,924 $116,272,269 1,2 1. In addition, surplus property value at $54,336 was tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Estimated Cost Type of Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Middlesboro Levees $581,000 $161,000 $742,000 1 (Yellow Creek, KY) Cumberland, KY Channel 520,000 240,000 760,0001 Improvement 1. Deferred. TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork River $53,412,000 1 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,167,7001 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 59,038,200 1.2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,683,200 s Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,486,700 Rossview, TN & KY Red River 12,590,000 4.s 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 4. See "Other authorized flood control projects." 5. Deferred. 23-18 30, 1985 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Apr. 1986 and Oct. 1986 Corbin, KY Apr. 1986 and Oct. 1986 Lake City, TN May 1986 and Oct. 1986 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) May 1986 and Oct. 1986 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) May 1986 and Oct. 1986 Paint Rock River, AL May 1986 and Oct. 1986 Pineville, KY Apr. 1986 and Oct. 1986 Spring City, TN May 1986 and Oct. 1986 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 86 Cost Browns Creek, Nashville, TN $23,488 Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN 23,802 Richland and Sugartree Creeks, TN 13,589 Whiteoak Creek, Sunbright, TN 1,649 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 86 Cost Canton Bridge, Trigg County, KY $33,261 Concord Park, Fort Loudoun, TN 7,500 Crab Orchard Branch, Wise County, VA 10,248 Tenn. River, Downtown Airport, Knoxville, TN 37,996 Lewis Branch, Houston County, TN 36,231 Paris Landing, TN 25,907 Piney River, Rhea County, TN 1,544 Sheffield, AL City Dock 37,573 Soddy Daisy, TN Repair 4,787 1. Includes $20 contributed funds from the city of Fort Loudoun, TN. 23-19 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central upstream from Foster, KY. to mouth. Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City All cost and financial statements for projects are listed area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland in text and also appear at the end of this chapteir. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River .............................. 24-2 2. Green and Barren Rivers, KY.............24-2 3. Kentucky River, KY.....................24-2 4. Open Channel Work, Ohio River........... 24-3 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................................ 24-3 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................... 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Dayton, KY................. ............ 24-3 8. Evansville, IN................ ........... 24-3 9. Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN .................. ...... 24-4 10. Mason J. Niblack Levee, Wabash River, IN.......................24-4 11. Mill Creek, OH............... ........... 24-4 12. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ............................. 24-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Barren River Lake, KY...................24-5 14. Brookville Lake, IN ...................... 24-5 15. Buckhorn Lake, KY .................... .24-6 16. Caesar Creek Lake, OH...................24-6 17. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ..................... 24-6 18. Carr Fork Lake, KY.....................24-7 19. Cave Run Lake, KY................ .... 24-7 20. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN................. 24-7 21. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH....................... 24-8 22. Green River Lake, KY....................24-8 23. Huntington Lake, IN ..................... 24-8 24. Mississinewa Lake, IN....................24-9 25. Monroe Lake, IN ........................ 24-9 26. Nolin Lake, KY ......................... 24-9 27. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) ....................... 24-10 28. Patoka Lake, IN........................24-10 29. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ....................... 24-10 30. Salamonie Lake, IN.....................24-11 31. Taylorsville Lake, KY................... 24-11 Page 32. Wabash River Basin .................... 24-11 33. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH........24-12 34. William H. Harsha Lake, OH.............24-12 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.........................24-12 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............................. 24-13 37. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization.................... 24-13 General Investigations 38. Surveys .............................. 24-13 39. Collection and Study of Basic Data........ 24-13 40. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............................ 24-13 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement ...................... 24-14 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation..........24-18 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ 24-19 Table 24-D Not Applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................. 24-20 Table 24-F Not Applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 24-22 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems........ 24-23 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan................ 24-24 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan............... 24-28 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............24-29 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.............24-31 24-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 2. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY. Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 3 at mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, is in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs are deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green; KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot depth to coal loading teminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 3. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-foot-depth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976 the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour yearround operation to two shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On 1 October 1981 Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and was again closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on 21 May 1985. The State of Kentucky plans to operate these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued a two shift, year-round operation. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1986, $271,205. 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Contract for miter gate repair and guard chain replacement was awarded in April 1986. Routine maintenance was performed. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964 and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. DAYTON, KY Location. In Campbell County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 467.0 to mile 469.2 and across the river from Cincinnati, Ohio. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Newport, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 8,170 feet of levee, two pumping stations with gravity drainage structures, and major relocations of storm and sanitary sewers serving the community. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $13,115,900 Federal and $2,043,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Formal assurances of cooperation were executed by City of Dayton, KY, on November 1969. Levee, floodwall, and pumping plants were transferred to the City of Dayton for operation and maintenance December 30, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented damages estimated at $287,000 during 1986 flood season. 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1986) is $55,692,700 Federal, including $7,900,000 (Oct 1977) for Howell Section, Unit 2, that is in "inactive" category, and $7,982,000 non-Federal, including $352,000 (Oct 1977) for the said Howell Section, Unit 2. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit 2, was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1, were executed February 11, 1963. Authorizations-of-entry for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1 and 2 have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Plans and specifications for U.S. Highway 41 and Oak Hill Road pump plants were begun and advanced to 35% completion. Plans and specifications for levee and floodwall Stringtown Road to U.S. Highway 41 advanced to about 90% completion. Contract for design of North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue and Stringtown Road pumping plants advanced to about 45% completion. Plans and specifications for levee and floodwall U.S. Highway 41 to Southern Railroad and Power Service for 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue and Stringtown Road advanced to about 35% and 60% completion, respectively. Contract for levee and floodwall Cedar Street to Stringtown Road and landscaping Garvin Park were completed. Flood damages estimated at $123,000 were prevented during the 1986 flood season. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1 and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, is in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, was started in April 1974 and is about 45 percent complete. General Design Memorandum and Supplement on Pigeon Creek Unit 2, and Design Memorandum and plans and specifications for Delaware, Dresden and North 6th Avenue pumping plants are approved. Design Memorandum for North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants is complete. Project is about 58 percent complete overall. 24-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 9. LEVEE UNIT NO. 5, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Gibson and Posey Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, from 58 to 94.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. Provides for construction of 41.9 miles of earth levee, drainage structures, pumping plants, together with alterations to three railroad bridges crossing Wabash River. Project provides protection for 44,000 acres of farm land and towns of Lyle, Skelton, and Griffin, IN, against a flood equal to that expected on an average of 7 times in each 100-year period. Estimated total cost of new work (1986) is $8,345,500 of which $905,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and road utility relocations. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1946. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Levee District on January 8, 1962. Completed portions of project (levees) were transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance October 15, 1969. Emerson Ditch pumping plant was transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance November 24, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract for Coffee Bayou pumping plant and entire project were completed. Flood damages estimated at $1,941,000 were prevented during the 1986 flood season. 10. MASON J. NIBLACK LEVEE, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Knox and Sullivan Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, between miles 134.8 and 151.8 above mouth. Existing project. Construction of two sections of earth levee totaling 18 miles in length, three pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, and other necessary appurtenances. Length of protection, including high ground between the two levee sections, is 18.9 miles long. Project protects 15,900 acres of agricultural land against a flood equal to that expected to occur 7 times in a 100-year period. Cost of the completed pumping plants was $2,782,905 all Federal cost and cost of the completed levee was $1,663,912 of which $109,200 was non-Federal cost and $1,554,712 was Federal cost. The levee project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act; pumping facilities were authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for levees and pumping plants. Operations during fiscal year. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented damages estimated at $2,026,000 during 1986 flood season. Construction of levees complete and transferred to Mason J. Niblack Levee District in January 1965 for operation and maintenance. Construction of the pumping plants and channel improvements complete and transferred to the local sponsor in May 1980. 11. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Proposed project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $188,066,000, of which $40,377,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Construction contract for channel Section 2 was advanced to 99 percent completion. Contract for Railraod Relocation and Construction of Channel Section 4A and Section 3 to Center Hill Road was awarded in April 1986 and advanced to 9 percent completion. Flood 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT damages estimated at $2,660,000 were prevented during the 1986 flood season. Design Memoranda, Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations, General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Sections 5 and 7 are complete. Construction of channel and levee - Sections 3 and 7A, Phase I, is complete. Project is about 26 percent complete overall. 12. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Provides for the construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project will provide protection fo 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $67,521,000, of which $57,604,000 is Federal, and $9,917,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Two contracts for construction of railroad closure at levee Section 4 and for construction of levee and floodwall Section 4 were both advanced to completion. Contract for Pond Creek Pumps and Motors, awarded in May 1985, was advanced to two percent completion. Contract for Levee Section 5 and Pond Creek Pumping Station awarded in September 1985 was advanced to 24 percent completion Contract for Remedial Work for Railroad Closure at Levee Section 5 was awarded in September 1986. Engineering studies are about 98 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4A; electric service for gatewells; Riverport and Upper and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants; rehabilitation of pump stations; and relocation of Texas Gas pipeline are complete. Project is 72 percent complete overall. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for control tower maintenance and bulkhead modification was awarded. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages of $81,000. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 14. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 24-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $45,382,551 of which $37,803,813 is Federal cost and $7,578,738 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Installation of hydropower unit is complete but is not in operation pending finalization of contract with Southeastern Power Administration for purchase of surplus power. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages of $58,000. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 15. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract was awarded and completed for emergency spillway clearing and road resurfacing. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages of $205,000. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 16. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $64,781,000 including $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Contract for Tailwater Conversion awarded in September 1985 was advanced to completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $1,481,000 were prevented during the 1986 flood season. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 17. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $4,263,184 including $155,416 Federal funds and $106,813 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Depart- 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT ment of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages of $3,227,000. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 18. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1986) is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate administrative action required for condemnation of remaining tracts was continued. Maintenance: Contract work continued on modification of hydraulic system. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages of $237,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. All land required for the project has been acquired; however, a number of condemnation actions remain unsettled. 19. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U. S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1986) is $114,826,300 of which $35,213,000 is U. S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts was continued. Contract for Zilpo recreation buildings, part I (4 bathhouses) was advanced to completion. Contract for tailwater comfort station conversion awarded in August 1985 was advanced to completion. Contract for Zilpo Recreation Buildings and Paving was awarded in November 1986 and advanced to 74 percent completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages of $1,762,000. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is about 92 percent complete overall. Land acquisition is complete except for outstanding condemnation actions. All relocation and construction features are complete except recreation facilities. 20. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U. S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract work was completed for replacement of control tower roof. Routine maintenance was per- 24-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 formed. Flood damages of $1,939,000 were prevented during the 1986 flood season. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 21. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 22. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock-fill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,606,061, including $317,145 Federal funds and $183,732 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance, and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for construction of new office building advanced to completion, as well as contracts for installation of new boiler and roof replacement of visitor's center and shop. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $219,000 during the 1986 flood season. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site js complete. 23. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consiste of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost for new work (1986) is $19,777,863 made up of $19,273,252 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non- Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 Federal cost and $155,354 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,434,000 during the 1986 flood control season. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 24. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gatecontrolled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acrefeet are reserved for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1986) is $24,596,129 made up of $23,578,145 Federal cost for the initial project and $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage and $389,392 Federal cost and $389,382 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $6,463,000 during 1986 flood season. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities cconstructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 25. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,569,589 made up of $7,032,484 Federal cost for the initial project and $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $$70,343 Federal cost and $869,158 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $716,000 during 1986 flood season. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 26. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gatecontrolled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1986) is $17,193,381 including $2,596,317 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for control tower maintenance and 24-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 bulkhead modification was awarded. Rountine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages estimated at $47,000. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 27. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing leglsiation, and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 28. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $78,417,700 of which $1,361,200 is Federal cost for emergency remedial measures and to clear and snag the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake, which work was directed by Congress in 1981; $51,507,800 is Federal cost for other construction, and $25,548,700 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to insure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of Jackson Site Access Road, awarded in November 1983, was advanced to completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damage estimated at $989,000. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 29. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acrefeet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1986 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,564,000. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 30. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acrefeet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1986) is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1986 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $5,167,000. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $119,262,000 made up of $92,225,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $16,025,000 non- Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $5,506,000 Federal cost and $5,506,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980 the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provded for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies and land acquisition continued. Contract for Tower and Vistor's Center Repair advanced to completion. Contract for final paving of relocated state highways and Settlers Trace access road and parking lot repairs advanced to 99 percent completion. During the 1986 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $470,000. Engineering and design studies are about 89 percent complete and land acquisition is about 96 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except utility relocations, final paving of state highways and recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. The project is about 87 percent complete overall. 32. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located 24-11 . REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 33. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid onehalf cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1986 flood season prevented damages estimated at $147,000. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 34. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1986) is $54,932,000 including $3,484,500 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981 by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies continued. Contract for comfort station conversion was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1986 flood season prevented damages of $1,145,000. Construction was started in May 1970. Engineering studies are 94 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired. Major relocation and construction features are complete, except one recreation item. Project is about 95 percent complete overall and was placed in operation in February 1978. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise in- 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT terests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $103,745. Total costs to September 30, 1986 were $2,780,047. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $155,879 for disaster preparedness, $15,753 for emergency operations, and $788,281for repair work on eight local protection projects. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $150,439 for preparation of initial appraisals, summary fact sheets, and detailed project reports on 9 projects, and $669,335 for plans and specifications and construction on three projects. See Table 24-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $2,086 for preparation of plans and specifications on two projects. See Table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $17,000 for preparation of initial appraisals on eight projects, $164,196 for plans and specifications and construction on two projects. See Table 24-L. General Investigations 38. SURVEYS. Fiscal year costs were $2,766,525 consisting of $1,766,583 for four flood damage prevention studies, $652,100 for the Wabash River Navigation Study and Grayville Special Report, $76,973 for Special Investigations, $25,262 for review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licenses, $241,017 for planning assistance to states, and $4,590 for Deauthorization review study. 39. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $171,384 for flood plain management services. 40. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Fiscal year costs were $634,148 for plan formulation and continuation of detailed planning studies on Fairfield, Ohio, start of detailed planning and engineering studies for Olmsted Locks & Dam, and Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio, Local Protection Project. 24-13 TABLE 24-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1983 1984 1985 1986 Sep 30, 1986 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7 Dayton, KY New Work Approp. Cost 8 Evansville, IN New Work Approp. Cost 9 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN 10 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN 11 Mill Creek, OH 12 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - $ - $ - $ - $13,808,2221 - - - - 13,808,2221 2,069,000 1,516,927 1,987,840 1,238,500 28,102,1122 3 1,695,152 1,926,628 2,154,447 1,267,516 28,088,0322 4 - - - - 4,176,749 - - - - 4,176,749 1,049,000 1,161,700 1,411,000 2,505,800 48,955,5895 6 881,140 1,168,626 1,609,460 2,493,699 48,931,7625 - - - - 556,956 - - - - 556,956 153,953 2,381,000 3,691,346 207,000 510,989 1,800,000 1,664,831 15,100 76,533 716,000 757,338 105,000 109,246 -89,000 300,448 13,117,3457 13,115,9067 28,376,8568 28,240,3528 790,000 -59,600 -89,000 0 7,530,987 362,983 175,279 473,628 -37,029 7,433,960 10,825 16,453 -1,000 673 - 4,337,617 - 4,337,617 2,683,600 7,639,900 9,586,000 9,614,000 40,371,742 5,252,537 6,083,545 10,952,631 10,064,391 39,234,260 7,028,710 1,420,000 2,430,000 3,484,000 42,345,183 5,883,989 2,552,857 1,286,893 4,731,054 41,292,419 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 14 Brookville Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 15 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp, Cost 1,030,000 1,054,768 134,096 123,811 360,000 373,597 1,077,000 1,015,488 -23,000 28,440 329,000 334,843 1,268,000 1,322,216 -56 409,000 418,991 1,189,000 1,167,073 27,371,2999 27,371,2999 13,416,4261 11 13,349,89010o 11 108,41812 108,41812 - 37,918,889 95 37,904,519 420,000 3,821,189 410,678 3,805,783 - 7,592,000 12 7,578,750 - - - - 11,766,20613 - - - - 11,766,20613 569,000 663,000 640,000 791,500 8,866,91014 577,485 672,955 651,327 801,081 8,848,48314 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding 1983 1984 1985 1986 Sep 30, 1986 Flood Control - Reservoirs 16 Caesar Creek Lake, OH 17 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 18 Carr Fork Lake, KY 19 Cave Run Lake, KY 20 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 21 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 22 Green River Lake, KY 23 Huntington Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $ 804,600 $ -268,000 169,000 - $62,893,882 1,421,753 1,080,039 320,283 162,680 62,844,167 539,000 561,000 579,000 631,000 3,852,463 557,474 515,619 618,053 601,671 3,807,695 210,701 -100,000 - - 4,263,18415 32,054 77,972 447 228 4,263,18415 259,000 317,000 506,000 346,000 4,932,506 286,789 317,164 489,109 371,968 4,928,272 - 205,000 - - 205,000 - 106,813 - - 106,813 1,279,469 2,627,600 -40,000 - 50,854,82616 1,196,546 2,697,307 4,993 1,845 50,817,13216 676,114 781,000 803,000 747,000 6,641,90017 752,337 776,283 768,785 784,850 6,612,10217 1,704,800 1,332,000 724,500 - 73,862,282 1,525,688 543,867 1,381,479 786,628 73,549,240 420,000 588,000 562,000 485,000 4,355,546 450,667 583,073 557,164 501,921 4,344,938 -24,994 - 6,633,81218 - - - 6,633,81218 285,000 327,700 312,000 518,400 5,597,496 294,817 330,662 313,930 500,086 5,573,845 - - - 22,083,660 - - - 22,083,660 291,000 420,000 374,000 379,000 3,636,347 318,305 373,189 419,925 372,932 3,622,875 -87 - - 33,422,32919 5,557 - - 33,422,32919 955,000 915,500 1,183,000 1,124,000 11,745,74920 967,808 908,362 1,177,646 1,143,281 11,695,02320 -53,594 - - - 19,428,60621 -402 -251 - - 19,427,95321 419,000 522,000 359,000 483,000 4,695,012 387,059 584,133 381,804 458,903 4,665,705 - -- - 193,903 - -- - 193,812 24-15 TABLE 24-A CONTINUED REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1983 1984 1985 1986 Sep 30, 1986 Flood Control - Reservoirs 24 Mississinewa Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 25 Monroe Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 26 Nolin Lake, KY 27 Ohio River Basin, Louisville District 28 Patoka Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 29 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvement, KY (Contributed Funds) 30 Salamonie Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $- 4,914 $ - $ - - - -3,003 275,000 364,000 399,000 322,806 345,812 331,851 -24,373 391,000 349,406 -217,719 -5,336 -969 1,050,000 1,052,033 416,300 449,356 -1,503 1,222,500 1,196,882 308,160 341,747 -2,460 -966 1,320,000 1,323,666 3,003 411,000 494,721 459,600 467,832 9 1,337,600 1,349,294 $23,967,53722 23,967,53722 4,479,105 4,466,079 239,200 237,871 7,902,82723 7,902,82723 5,002,42524 4,992,19024 7,797,604 7,797,604 17,193,38125 17,193,38125 15,357,51526 15,274,52526 - 1,526,142 - 1,526,142 48,200 -2,240 257,000 285,712 325,639 214,515 -8 18 1,213,000 1,280,131 -208 1,956 302,000 349,336 43,400 399,647 320,000 312,123 447,150 339,137 90,216 311,000 313,500 76,114 8,114 379,000 385,206 -29,640 1,618 53,080,790 53,058,435 2,415,131 2,401,726 20,646,649 20,293,821 - -- 10,620,38927 - -- 10,620,38927 1,304,000 1,288,000 1,095,000 15,514,81028 1,279,021 1,320,794 1,104,891 15,470,69828 - - 22,61212 - - 22,61212 - - 16,559,90529 - - - 16,559,90529 362,000 304,000 444,000 4,587,313 325,759 349,873 418,578 4,556,464 - - - 170,697 - - - 163,867 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1983 1984 1985 1986 Sep 30, 1986 Flood Control - Reservoirs 31 Taylorsville Lake, KY New Work Approp. $8,140,081 $3,200,000 $ 844,400 - $81,296,478 Cost 7,486,233 4,433,310 1,838,703 516,124 80,527,824 Maint. Approp. 290,000 379,000 468,000 528,000 1,665,000 Cost 257,702 373,917 489,253 535,625 1,656,497 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. 816,838 - - 228,993 2,000,831 Cost 370,071 448,100 118,180 249,331 1,735,635 33 West Fork of Mill New Work Creek Lake, OH Approp. - -86,600 - - 3,622,30230 Cost -55,000 78 - - 3,622,30230 Maint. Approp. 280,000 294,000 264,000 285,000 3,758,889 Cost 428,961 288,634 289,713 286,138 3,755,637 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - 50,000 Cost - - 50,000 34 William H. Harsha New Work Lake, OH Approp. - 37,500 -15,000 - 52,023,15731 Cost 550,103 665,689 69,624 116,209 52,008,62431 Maint. Approp. 428,000 381,000 422,000 481,200 3,179,566 Cost 440,066 378,829 425,414 482,245 3,161,116 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $736,767 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4 Includes $731,854 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5 Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters," and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 6 Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. ' Includes $12,426 allotted to Bellevue-Dayton and used in study of that project. 8 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds. 9 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds and $110,107 Code 713 funds. 10 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 1 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 12 Cost sharing for Code 713 recreation facilities. 13 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 14 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds and $119,602 Code 713 funds. 16 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 17 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 18 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $353,995 Code 713 funds. 19 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds. 20 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees. 21 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds. 22 Includes $389,392 Code 713 funds. 23 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $869,158 Code 713 funds. 24 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,596,317 Code 711 funds. 26 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees and includes $52,000 Supplemental Funds. 27 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds. 28 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees. 29 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds. 30 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds. 31 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 24-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Aug 11, 1888 Purchase of original improvement Mar 3, 18931 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Jul 13, 1892 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Jul 13, 1902 Construction of Lock 6, Green River Mar 3, 19052 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River" Mar 3, 1909 Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Jul 3, 19302 Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widens bends in Bear Creek, KY Jun 26, 19343 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Aug 30, 19352 Improvement of Nolin River Sep 3, 1954 Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River Recovation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Aug 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, Kentucky at an estimated cost of $129,350 Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an estimated cost of $360,000 Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River Basin, Illinois and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000 Jul 3, 1958 Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000 Oct 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin 24-18 Documents H. Ex. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Annual Report 1887, p. 1903 Annual Report, 1891, p.2 4 3 9 Annual Report, 1891, p.2 4 78 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Session, and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Session H.D. 480, 72d Congress, 2d Sess. S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Congress., 1st Session Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, 2d Session S.D. 105, 78th Congress, 1st Session H. D. 535, 78th Congress, 2d Session H. D. 197, 80th Congress, 1st Session H.D.198, 80th Congress, 1st Sess H. D. 192, 85th Congress, 1st Session H. D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 8 ong. 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th ong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Session TABLE 24-B CONTINUED LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (Cont'd.) Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehen- Public Law 91-282, 91st Congress, sive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehen- Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, sive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Mar 7, 1974 Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized 2d Session August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Aug 13, 1968 Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2d Session local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with proviso that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Dec 29, 1981 Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River Basin were Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, deauthorized 2d Session 1 Deficiency act. 2 Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954. s Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 $ 101,196 33,331 24-19 TABLE 24-E For Last Full Report See Annual Project and Status' Report For Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Construction Operation and Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River)3 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River)2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River)2 Levee Unit 8, IN (White River) Louisville, KY4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River)2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River)6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River)2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River)2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclare, IL Saline River & Tribs, IL Shawneetown, IL 8 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River)7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River)2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)8 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River)8 9 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1952 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1952 1975 1944 1965 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 19-7_ 9 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 130,417 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 1,554,712 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 613,927 52,088 24-20 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-E CONTINUED OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report For Construction Maintenance Inactive: Anderson, IN (White River) Caseyville, KY Cloverport, KY Concordia, KY Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) Lewisport, KY Marion, IN (Wabash River) Metropolis, IL New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River)2 Newport-Wilder, KY Owensboro, KY Salyersville, KY (Licking River) Shawneetown, IL Smithland, KY Tolu, KY Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) West Point, KY Reservoirs: Active - no FY 1986 expenditure Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) Mining.City Lake, KY (Green River) Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1940 1979 1979 1976 1979 1973 1979 1959 1946 1964 1983 1983 1977 1980 1976 1975 1981 1977 1976 $ 5,724 157,935 153,410 355,963 60,000 209,975 10,575 12,000 25,367 4,490 160,773 2,335,812 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 702,471 944,386 1,200,920 350,474 1,794,308 1 All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3 Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4 Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contribution from City of Louisville, KY. s Cost shown are for Levee only. Does not included costs for pump plants. 6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. ' Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portion of project deauthorized. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portion of project deferred. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 24-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - Alton, IN - 1977 Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 Bromley, KY - 1977 California (Cincinnati) OH - 1977 16,465 Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 Deer Creek, Prairie, Levee, IN - 1977 Derby, IN - 1977 Elizabethtown,, IL - 1977 Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 Leavenworth, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 Madison, IN - 1977 Mauckport, IN - 1977 McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 Milton, KY - 1977 Moscow, OH - 1977 New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 New Harmony, IN - 1977 New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 Patriot, IN - 1977 Prestonville , KY - 1977 Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 Rising Sun, IN - 1977 Rockport, IN - 1977 Rome, IN - 1977 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 Terre Haute, IN - 1977 Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 Troy, IN - 1977 Utica, IN - 1978 Vevay, IN - 1977 Westport, KY - 1977 Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 Metamora Lake, IN - 1977 24-22 TABLE 24-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Jam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and Dam (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER -For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Spottsville, KY 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY Woodbury, KY 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY Barren River 1 15.0 " 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 3 of Text) 3.8 miles above Carrollton, KY Lockport, KY Gest, KY 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY Valley View, KY 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY Ravenna, KY 2.2 miles below Willow, KY Heidelberg, KY 84.0 84.0 35.8 35.8 56.0 36.0 56.0 600.0 600.0 137.5 138.0 360.0 145.0 360.0 11.8' 14.3 17.0 16.4 15.2 9.2 349.1 363.4 380.4 396.8 412.0' 421.1 Barren River 15.2 412.0 12.1 15.0 7.3 7.1 12.0 8.0 11.3 11.7 5.6 6.5 9.3 8.8 Shale and Coal Shale Rock Rock Piles and Rock Gravel 12.0 9.3 100 100 100 100 100 100 1956' 1956' 1836' 1839' 1905' 1905' $5,101,978' 4,799,2715 121,377 125,718 1,020,868 ' 168,415 100 1934 871,565" Kentucky River 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 145.0 147.0 147.0 146.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 148.0 8.2 13.9 13.2 13.2 15.0 14.0 15.3 18.7 17.3 17.0 18.0 17.0 18.0 17.0 430.0 443.9 457.1 470.3 485.3 499.3 514.6 533.6 550.6 567.6 585.6 602.6 620.6 637.6 8.21" 7.6 8.6 6.4 10.0 9.4 9.1 10.6 10.0 9.0 10.0 9.6 9.6 8.6 14.8 6.1 6.5 7.4 6.5 6.4 6.9 6.0 6.6 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Rock and Clay Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock and Piles Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1839" 1839" 1844" 1844" 1844" "' 1894" 1897" 190018 1907" 19071" 1906" 1910 ' " 19151" 19171" 1,350,385" 314,847 290,788 275,463 237,646 221,500 296,593 425,693 461,476 392,902 ' At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum). = New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956; old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M General funds at cost of $822,000. ' Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. " New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. * Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. * With movable A frame crest 3 feet high. * Operation discontinued Aug. 1, 1951. 1O Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. " Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. " Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. , At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). " Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. ,s Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436. Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. Green River New 1 New 2 3 45 6 9.1 63.1 108.5 149.0 168.1 181.7 Kentucky River 1 234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 4.0 31.0 42.0 65.0 82.2 96.2 117.0 139.9 157.5 176.4 201.0 220.0 239.9 249.0 r 0 c rr REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost2 Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)3 4 Brookport, IL5 6 Cannelton, IN 5 7 Cincinnati, OH5 8 Covington, KY5 9 Delphi, IN (Wabash River)5 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River)11 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) 5 North Frankfort5 Golconda, IL5 12 Harrisburg, IL 5 10 Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River)5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN5 Louisville, KY5 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)4 " New Albany, IN5 8 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River)5 7 Newport, KY 5 7 Paducah, K Y5 ' Reevesville, IL (Cache River)5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River)"11 Rough River, KY3 4 Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River)" Taylorsville, KY (Salt River)5 16 Tell City, IN5 14 Uniontown, KY 5 17 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)5 (completed portion) West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Dayton, KY4 Evansville, IN4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River)5 South Frankfort 5 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River)9 Inactive: Caseyville, KY5 Cloverport, KY 5 Concordia, KY5 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River)5 Benson Creek5 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Lewisport, KY5 Metropolis, IL' New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River)5 7 Owensboro, KY 5 Shawneetown, IL' Smithland, KY 5 Tolu, KY5 Vicennes, IN (Wabash River)5 (Uncompleted Portion) West Point, KY5 Wilders, KY Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Channel improvement Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 144,563 734,498 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 p 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,139 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 - 297,624 298,506 7,811,493 232,000 4,993,551 40,000 640,300 100,000 1,179,236 93,000 1,919,778 63,309 441,359 32,707 964,936 72,153 1,143,079 285,000 3,593,941 150,000 1,245,704 13,115,900 2,043,000 15,158,90018 55,692,700 7,982,000 63,674,70018 7,120,000 660,000 7,780,00019 19,400,000 2,340,000 21,740,00020 Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Bank protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee 396,000 728,000 590,000 3,340,000 4,600,000 4,630,000 610,000 3,070,000 664,376 886,000 1,810,000 864,000 303,000 3,340,000 35,000 193,000 55,000 1,150,000 1,087,000 528,000 243,000 431,000 99,000 195,000 361,000 414,000 35,000 431,000 921,000 645,000 4,490,00021 5,687,00022 5,158,00022 853,00023 3,501,000 763,37624 1,081,000 2,171,000 1,278,000 338,000 3,340,00027 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,00023 10,800,000 959,000 11,759,00025 24-24 TABLE 24-I LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost2 Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (Public Law 93-251): Alton, IN Bellevue, KY Bromley, KY Carrollton, KY Cave-in-Rock, IL Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) Cleves, OH Clinton, IN (Wabash River) Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) Derby, IN Elizabethtown, IL Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) Grandview, IN Honey Creek Levee, IN Leavenworth, IN Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 17, IN Levee Unit 1, White River, IN Levee Unit 2, White River, IN Levee Unit 7, White River, IN Ludlow, KY Madison, IN Mauckport, IN McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) Milton, KY Moscow, OH New Amsterdam, IN New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) New Richmond, OH Patriot, IN Prestonville, KY Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) Rising Sun, IN Rockport, IN Rome, IN Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) Troy, IN Vevay, IN Westport, KY Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee- Wall $ 255,000 1,570,000 1,250,000 2,220,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,090,000 2,850,000 3,410,000 1,160,000 1,580,000 2,180,000 724,000 1,490,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 753,000 1,710,000 426,000 896,000 466,000 359,000 2,380,000 418,000 2,050,000 502,000 1,170,000 1,610,000 $ 40,000 400,000 925,000 97,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 715,000 164,000 136,000 56,000 118,000 116,000 73,000 88,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 372,000 55,000 37,000 280,000 133,000 67,000 90,000 29,000 191,000 133,000 146,000 41,000 $ 295,000 1,970,000 2,175,000 2,317,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 223,00023 620,000 712,000 574,00023 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 2,805,000 3,014,00026 3,546,00027 1,216,000 1,698,00027 2,296,00026 797,00026 1,578,00026 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,125,000 1,765,000 463,00023 1,176,000 599,000 426,000 2,470,000 447,00023 2,241,00027 635,000 1,316,000 1,651,000 24-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Project and Status' Construction Federal Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Aurora, IN California (Cincinnati), OH Deauthorized October 3, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) Utica, IN5 Deauthorized May 6, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River)5 Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Channel improvement 1 All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. 5 Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. ' See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 24-26 Estimated Cost2 Non-Federal Total $4,300,000 1,750,000 292,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 '$1,190,000 720,000 14,000 120,000 630,000 $5,490,000 2,470,000 306,00027 1,690,000 1,710,00027 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 27 of Text) RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin Reservoirs Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY2 Carr Fork Lake, KY2 Licking River Cave Run Lake, KY2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Status Active Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Active Active Inactive Active Active Complete Active Complete Complete Active Stream East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River Estimated Cost' Federal Non-Federal Total $37,904,424 $7,578,7383 $ 45,483,162 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,422,329 69,100,000 17,193,381 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,300 125,000,000 108,4185 183,7325 22,6125 35,300,0004 27,479,717 33,606,061 69,100,0004 17,193,381 10,643,001 60,700,0006 11,766,206 50,854,826 - 114,826,3007 - 125,000,0008 59,744,000 5,037,0009 64,781,000 51,447,500 3,484,5009 54,932,000 3,622,302 1,100,1611o 4,722,463 4,156,368 6,633,812 7,902,827 106,8165 353,9955 8,666,76211 4,263,184 6,987,807 16,569,589 52,869,000 25,548,70012 78,417,700 Latest cost estimate revision 1986 unless otherwise noted. Details of this project given in individual report. Cash contributions for water supply storage. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. For Code 713 recreation development. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. Includes $35,213,000 United States Forest Service cost. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. Reimbursement for water supply storage. 10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. " Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $869,158 for Code 713 recreation development. 12 Includes $14,173,500 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $11,375,200 for initial recreation development. 24-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN:. (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 32 of Text) Type of Construction Estimated Cost Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,0002 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,846,0003 141,046,0004 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,0005 126,869,0004 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Active 74,200,000 64,448,000 138,648,0001 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,0007 40,000,0008 Louisville, Lake, IL Little Wabash River Active 113,000,000 14,435,0009 127,435,00010 1 Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 3 Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 4 Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 5 Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 6 Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. ' Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $2,133,000 for recreation facilities. 8 Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 9 Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 24-28 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Date of Local Protection Projects Inspection Brevoort Levee, IL Jul 1986 Brookport, IL bct 1985 Cache River Levee, IL Oct 1985 Cannelton, IN Nov 1985 Cincinnati, OH Jun 1986 Covington, KY Nov 1985 Dayton, KY Jun 1986 Delphi, IN Apr 1986 England Pond Levee, IL Jun 1986 Evansville, IN Jun 1986 Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Dec 1985 Gill Township Levee, IN May 1986 Golconda, IL Oct 1985 Harrisburg, IL Oct 1985 Hawesville, KY Nov 1985 Indianapolis, IN Apr 1986 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Dec 1985 Lawrenceburg, IN Jun 1986 Lebanon Junction, KY Dec 1985 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Oct 1985 Levee Unit No. 8, IN May 1986 Louisville, KY Aug 1986 Lyford Levee, IN May 1986 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Jul 1986 Mt. Carmel, IL Oct 1985 Muncie, IN Apr 1986 New Albany, IN Dec 1985 Newport, KY Nov 1985 Paducah, KY Oct 1985 Reevesville, IL Oct 1985 Rochester-McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL Oct 1985 Rosiclare, IL Oct 1985 Shawneetown, IL Oct 1985 Sturgis, KY Jun 1986 Taylorsville, KY Dec 1985 Tell City, IN Nov 1985 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN May 1986 Uniontown, KY Jun 1986 Vincennes, IN Jul 1986 West Terre Haute, IN May 1986 24-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U. S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Dates of Channel Improvements Inspection Chaplin River, Perryville, KY Sep 1986 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Jul 1986 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN May 1986 English, IN (Little Blue River) Aug 1986 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1985 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1986 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jul 1986 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jul 1986 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Aug 1986 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Sep 1986 Neon-Fleming, KY Jul 1986 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1986 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Jul 1986 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Aug 1986 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Apr 1986 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Jul 1986 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Oct 1985 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY Jul 1986 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Jul 1986 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jul 1986 Bank Revetments Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham Co., KY Aug 1986 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Mar 1985 Green River, Calhoun, KY Jan 1986 Licking River, Butler, KY Nov 1985 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Oct 1985 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Jun 1986 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Jun 1986 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Daviess Co., KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL May 1986 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Madison, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Nov 1985 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN Jun 1986 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Jun 1986 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jun 1986 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone Co., KY Jun 1986 Ohio River, Rockport Landing, IN Jun 1986 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Nov 1985 Ohio River, Troy, IN Jun 1986 Ohio River, Upper River Rd., Jefferson Co., KY Aug 1986 Ohio River, Vanderburg Co., IN Jun 1986 Patoka River at Jasper, IN May 1986 Patoka River, Winslow, IN May 1986 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1986 Wabash River near Merom, IN May 1986 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Jan 1985 White River, Brownstown, IN May 1986 White River, Pike Co., IN May 1986 Whitewater River, Levee Rd., IN Jan 1986 WTP, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Jun 1986 24-30 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 37 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Jobs Bill' Total Flood Control: Canoe Creek at Henderson, KY' $12,960 $613,927 Camp Run, Sellersburg, IN3 - 1,507 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN4 40 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH2 3 18,188 Lancassage Creek, Clark Co., IN- 24,885 Little Beaver Creek, Kettering, OH4 1,769 Lyford Levee, IN4 59,840 Old Sulphur Cr., Orleans, IN3 14 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN4 42,780 Salyersville, KY5 36 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH4 26,265 Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN5 30,523 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control: Lick Creek, Hartford City, IN5 6 1,011 Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN5 1,075 Emergency Bank Protection: Ft. Massac State Park, IL 7 130,680 Green River, Calhoun, KY7 - 33,516 Ohio River, Riverfront Park, Evansville,IN 2 5,000 Ohio River, Rising Sun, IN2 - 7,500 Whitewater River, New Trenton, IN2 4,500 Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983 Initial Appraisal Reconnaissance Study Detail Project Report Plans and Specifications Construction Funds Received Construction Completed 24-31 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, Pa.) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ................................... ... 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ..................................... 25-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River .................... 25-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 25-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ..................................... 25-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ................................... 25-2 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 25-3 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 25-3 9. Chillicothe, OH ..................................... 25-3 10. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ................................... 25-4 11. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ..................................... 25-4 12. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ........................................ 25-4 13. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ........................................ 25-4 14. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ................................... 25-5 15. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............ 25-5 16. Grayson Lake, KY ..................................... 25-5 17. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin,VA ................... 25-6 18. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, KY, WV and VA ................................. 25-6 19. Massillon, OH ..................................... 25-6 20. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ................ ... 25-7 21. Newark, OH ........................................ 25-7 22. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ........................................ 25-7 23. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA .......... 25-8 24. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ......... 25-8 25. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ..................................... 25-8 26. Paintsville Lake, KY ..................................... 25-8 27. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV ................................... 25-9 28. Roseville, OH ..................................... 25-9 29. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 25-9 30. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 25-9 31. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH ..................................... 25-10 32. Yatesville Lake, KY .................................... 25-10 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................. 25-10 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................. 25-11 General Investigations 35. Surveys ..................................... 25-11 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............... 25-11 Tables Table Table Table 25-A 25-B 25-C Table 25-D Table 25-E Table Table Table 25-F 25-G 25-H Cost & Financial Statement ....... 25-12 Authorization Legislation ........... 25-16 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 25-19 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 25-20 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects .................. 25-21 Inspection of Flood Control Projects ........................... 25-22 25-1 Page REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22 - Ohio River 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $23,403,201. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 25-B, see also, Appendix C. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22 - Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 25-C. 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,427. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,195,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $38,282,000 in flood damages. 6. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV., on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 25-2 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. The 485 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The full funding estimate for new work is $42,400,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering activities for remaining work items continued. The project is essentially complete, except for remaining recreation facilities, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and maintenance. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated at $177,000 during the fiscal year. To date the project has prevented an estimated $2,855,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV., approximately three miles above Hinton, WV and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23 foot highweir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $23,090,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $577,441,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County WV, on the LIttle Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,195,839. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated at $5,769,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $22,456,000 in flood damage. 9. CHILLICOTHE, OH Location. The project is located in Ross County, OH, along the right bank of the Scioto River, approximately 69 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of 10,805 feet of earth levee, four gate openings and four pump stations. The Federal cost of the project was $20,373,314. The estimated non-Federal cost is $2,430,000. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1975 and became operational for flood control in May 1983. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation are complete. For further details see the 1978 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The project is complete. To date the project has prevented an estimated $10,000 in flood damages. 25-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 10. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741 foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,313,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $17,521,000 in flood damages. 11. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $982,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $54,793,000 in flood damages. 12. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $573,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $52,892,000 in flood damages. 13. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. 25-4 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acre in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $4,761,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $102,732,000 in flood damages. 14. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project was $37,025,968. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated at $504,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $34,270,000 in flood damages. 15. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,670,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs wer made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $287,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $263,509,000 in flood damages. 16. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, Kentucky on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. 25-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $745,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $30,981,000 in flood damages. 17. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $229,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $137,857,000 in flood damages. 18. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY AND CUMBERLAND RIVERS, WV, VA, AND KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY; and Grundy, VA on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for that portion of the authorized areas consisting of the Williamson, WV area, Pineville, KY, Barboursville, KY and other detailed studies is $314,600,000. Which includes $15,600,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV was awarded in April 1983 and is 95% complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is 1% complete. The overall project is 24% complete. 19. MASSILLON, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 25-6 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 20. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $25,000,000. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $71,340,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work. The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty contracts have been awarded and the program is 76% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far five contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 11% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $39,321,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,093,374,000 in flood damages. 21. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $9,800,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 22. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles, the 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. 25-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. Necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 23. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $57,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $4,662,000 in flood damages. 24. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection porjects, which are operated and maintained by local interest, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated aggregate total of $28,566,000. 25. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, Ohio, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gale controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 arcre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $1,921,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $37,900,000. 26. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $66,300,000, which is to be appropriated and expended by the Federal Government. 25-8 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $298,222 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is well advanced. The remaining work items include minor highway relocations, landscaping and final cleanup. Operations and Maintenance: The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $57,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $5,643,000. 27. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east ofJustice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. The estimate for new work is $250,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is well advanced. The remaining work items include remaining recreation, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,484,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $57,292,000. 28. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 29. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $26,313,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $246,509,000 in flood damages. 30. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. 25-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1960. A total of 13,154 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $37,029,585, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $28,407,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $171,782,000 in flood damages. 31. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, Ohio and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met, see also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $171,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $9,407,000 in flood damages. 32. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The full funding estimate for new work is $104,000,000, which will be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $6,615,000 for the cost sharing portion of the recreation development. To date, 302 of the required 599 real estate tracts have been acquired. A contract for construction of the dam was awarded in January 1977 and was terminated for the convenience of the Government in August 1977. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Congress appropriated funds in fiscal year 1981 to resume project construction and work progressed until March 1981 when administration directed a deferral action which resulted in a substantial reduction in project funds and the elimination of any recommendation for funding in fiscal years 1982 and 1983. Congressional action provided fiscal year 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and 1986 funding for the project. The contract for Construction of Dam and Appurtenant Works, Phase I, was awarded in March 1984 and is complete. Contracts with the Commonwealth and the County for relocation and/or abandonment of roads affected by the project are complete. The contract for construction of Dam and Appurtenances (Phase II) was awarded in April 1986 and is 23% complete. The contract for Relocation of SR32-2 was awarded in February 1986 and is 85% complete. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The flood control act of June 22, 1936 and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units 25-10 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1986 were $75,272. Total cost to September 30, 1986 were $1,276,339. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Dunbar (Sewage Facilities) WV Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV Little Stillwater Creek, Urichsville, OH Ohio River, Gallipolis, Ohio Point Pleasant State Park, WV Sistersville City Park, WV FY 1986 Cost $18,303 17,482 15,129 13,302 10,849 5,476 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: FY 1986 Cost Blacklick Creek, Franklin County, OH Hughes Creek, Hugheston, WV Landis Ditch, Rittman, OH Marsh Fork, Fairdale, WV Muskingum River, Manfield, OH Shope Creek, Ashland, KY Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH $152,426 107,228 80,111 55,051 34,384 106,000 12,042 Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Indian Creek, Wyoming County, WV Wolf Creek, Proctorville, OH FY 1986 Cost $ 6,500 37,925 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1986 at a cost of $312,621. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1986 were $149,986. 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1986 costs were $2,779,925 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review for Deauthorization Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Continuation of Planning and Engineering 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $167,221. $732,558 995,694 297,784 4,934 76,468 191,268 481,219 25-11 Location TABLE 25-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 2. Kanawha River, WV 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 9. Chillicothe, OH 10. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 11. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 430,292 4,996,000 5,156,126 165,591 1,265,550 462,000 466,979 1,700,000 1,812,526 486,000 502,334 22,000 155,886 5,631,000 5,522,048 719,142 450,000 438,273 1,950,000 1,839,500 490,000 484,504 - 1,049 763,000 1,033,000 749,878 953,694 4,200,000 3,394,211 565,000 575,697 650,000 1,399,214 745,000 726,644 696,000 -290,000 385,470 406,093 621,000 633,824 470,000 489,691 884,000 975,000 561,287 1,150,611 - - 27,853,6991 - - 27,853,699' 6,271,000 6,765,000 73,056,5842 7,008,174 6,780,172 73,021,4482 - - 130,3943 - - 130,3943 -20,300 146,538 691,000 698,086 1,200,000 1,382,433 554,000 545,316 1,055,000 1,181,993 -110,000 413,697 989,000 1,014,583 -85,000 11,278 447,960 446,813 -45,933 5,341 600,200 608,490 186,000 281,817 608,000 620,375 56,267,422 56,267,422 4,439,265 4,414,336 42,027,500 41,875,582 4,532,039 4,524,759 - 29,458,6524 - 29,458,6524 730,200 11,710,278 725,974 11,683,991 -39,426 12,722 1,079,600 1,063,503 56,195,839 56,195,839 5,875,105 5,838,573 -1,785 20,373,314 12,379 20,373,314 431,200 454,619 334,000 1,244,500 481,846 1,255,843 20,406,5455 20,406,5455 5,686,5256 5,679,8716 7,631,821 7,631,821 7,281,2197 7,268,964' 25-12 TABLE 25-A (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 12. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 13. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 14. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 15. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 16. Grayson Lake, KY 17. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 18. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA 19. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 774,500 920,000 1,235,000 794,093 848,817 1,281,093 425,000 380,000 597,000 373,508 376,678 631,304 2,200,000 2,348,307 850,100 855,404 73,410 945,000 861,546 83,884 837,000 811,006 -1,967 7,805 1,175,000 1,140,831 - 7,845,5478 - 7,845,5478 935,400 11,471,3769 935,266 11,440,8249 - 30,218,135 - 30,218,135 823,300 4,928,14310 809,990 4,908,11810 - - 37,025,968 27 - 37,025,968 973,000 1,169,000 9,337,90711 984,952 1,201,498 9,311,85811 869,000 992,134 O - 13 - - 649,400 720,000 694,000 682,100 606,442 785,280 87,234 753,010 807,226 -14,215 - 759 - 681,000 674,000 677,713 732,210 - 54,670,12612 - 54,670,12612 757,500 6,087,69813 777,145 6,068,07613 - 19,162,74114 - 19,162,74114 572,000 7,906,070 598,334 7,895,697 - 20,444,38315 - 20,444,38315 666,500 9,180,36216 674,436 9,173,29816 8,800,000 1,600,000 5,140,000 14,329,000 37,669,000 3,595,244 4,744,091 8,063,946 14,833,694 36,776,609 17,000 16,988 12,000 12,013 18,000 17,999 13,300 12,942 8,139,40617 8,139,40617 293,808 293,449 25-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 25-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 20. Muskingum River New Work Dams & Lakes, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost 21. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 22. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 23. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 24. Ohio River Basin 25. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 26. Paintsville Lake, KY 27. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,750,000 3,950,351 1,425,000 1,144,622 2,950,000 2,240,704 23,000 23,001 291,352 272,524 126,000 109,505 199,000 206,535 -15,591 15,182 496,700 457,113 6,285,000 7,019,206 420,500 416,231 5,800,000 6,017,764 735,000 759,759 4,380,000 4,067,444 1,550,000 1,344,317 1,600,000 1,673,128 26,000 26,002 300,000 350,514 4,118,000 4,347,427 1,636,000 2,248,347 900,000 1,312,092 17,377 17,377 134,000 251,472 94,000 103,000 103,989 109,710 313,000 255,000 296,015 268,505 425,000 415,000 475,195 435,438 3,790,000 3,273,809 505,000 486,911 15,600,000 14,817,521 1,575,000 1,541,382 1,721,000 1,693,268 573,000 579,651 9,250,000 10,295,735 1,034,000 1,042,399 4,041,000 4,154,795 993,000 1,139,211 60,000 308,507 13,800 13,737 297,785 198,296 58,600 59,642 199,000 206,538 464,000 455,093 84,359 435,106 844,500 816,543 271,600 2,551,000 2,571,582 41,247,81518 41,247,81518 56,975,07019 56,916,67719 19,535,94520 19,438,31920 6,940,000 6,827,774 845,916 845,916 715,942 715,879 5,772,512 5,671,278 6,665,98521 6,665,98521 1,343,617 1,340,933 6,186,90122 6,186,90122 4,840,35923 4,838,36923 355,86124 355,86124 26,969,96225 26,969,96225 4,646,95626 4,624,37726 57,867,147 57,546,472 2,760,000 2,753,141 215,972,23327 215,958,07227 8,091,81428 8,067,89328 25-14 TABLE 25-A (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 28. Roseville, OH New Work Approp. - - - - 910,785 Cost - - - - 910,785 Maint. Approp. 5,000 7,000 10,000 20,000 148,968 Cost 4,999 7,003 9,998 19,961 148,966 29. Summersville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. - 7,183 -10,000 - 48,375,884 WV Cost 11,682 7,598 17,895 - 48,375,88429 Maint. Approp. 1,940,000 1,119,000 982,000 1,649,000 14,054,914 Cost 2,103,955 1,087,885 1,046,276 1,656,311 14,015,783 30. Sutton Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. - 185,000 10,000 -5,376 37,029,58531 WV Cost - 29,016 147,803 12,805 37,029,58531 Maint. Approp. 1,377,700 1,228,000 1,526,000 1,480,000 17,869,48732 Cost 1,272,293 1,360,473 1,496,687 1,567,279 17,824,55432 31. Tom Jenkins Dam, New Work OH Approp. - - - - 2,086,50333 Cost - - - - 2,086,5033" Maint. Approp. 243,000 225,000 268,000 371,000 3,637,475 Cost 243,648 228,745 258,014 378,150 3,626,126 32. Yatesville Lake, New Work KY Approp. 4,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 9,642,000 54,686,500 Cost 1,401,135 3,508,186 5,921,767 10,201,760 33,298,796 'Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 5Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 6Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 7Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 8Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,94 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 9Includes $82,900 special recreation use fee funds. 1�Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. l"Includes $209,918 special recreation use fee funds. 12Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. l3Includes $38,000 special recreation use fees. '4Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 15Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 16Includes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 17Includes $477,813 contributed funds. l8Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 9ncludes $131,900 Maintenance and Operations funds. 20lncludes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 2 1Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 22Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 23Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 24Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 25Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 26Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 27Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 28Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 29lncludes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 30 ncludes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds and $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983. 31Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 32Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $75,400 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 33Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 25-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1986 TABLE 25-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30,1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation CHILLICOTHE, OH Construction of Levees and Pump Stations. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd. Sess. H. Doc. 587, 8th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., lst Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-16 7. 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. TABLE 25-B (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 16. Jul. 14, 1960 17. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 18. Oct. 1,1980 19. Jun. 28, 1938 20. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 21. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13,1968 22. Oct. 23, 1962 23. Jul. 14, 1960 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1986 TABLE 25-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 25. Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28,1938 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 22, 1936 25-18 PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. 26. 27. 28. 29. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., lst Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 30. 31. 32. 33. HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tu Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 1In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. "Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1986 TABLE 25-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 - Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 - - Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 - East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 - Galax, VA 1953 480,536 - Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 - Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 - Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 - Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 - Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 - Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 - - Russell, KY 1953 552,493 - Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 - Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY - 11,577 - Burlington, OH - - - - Chesapeake, OH - - - - Coal Grove, OH - 3,389 Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 - - Dover, KY - - Fullerton, KY - Greenup, KY - 4,962 - Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV - 17,721 - Miller, OH - - - Normal, KY - Proctorville, OH - - - Ravenswood, WV - - South Point, OH - - - - South Portsmouth, KY - - Vanceburg, KY - - - Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 - - Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 - - Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA - 2,656 - - Leading Creek, WV 1974 272,880 - - Panther Creek, WV 1976 22,879 - Salt Creek, OH 1975 1,089,943 - Utica, OH 1975 757,550 - West Fork, WV 1974 663,192 - Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Birch, WV . Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 - Logan, OH . Moores Ferry, WV . Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 25-20 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH - May 1981 1,334 - Athalia, OH - Aug 1977 - - Belpre, OH - Nov 1977 - - Brooklyn, WV - Nov 1979 - - Buena Vista, OH - Aug 1977 - - Chambersburg, OH - Aug 1977 - - Cheshire, OH - Nov 1977 - - Chilo, OH - Aug 1977 - - Clifton, WV - Aug 1977 11,237 - Columbus, OH - Aug 1977 - - Friendly, WV - Aug 1977 - - Gallipolis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hanging Rock, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hartford, WV - Aug 1977 - - Henderson, WV - Aug 1977 - Higginsport, OH - Oct 1978 - - Hockingport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Letart, WV - Aug 1977 - - Letart Falls, OH - Aug 1977 - - Manchester, OH - May 1981 - - Mapleshade, OH - Oct 1978 - - Marietta, OH - Nov 1981 - - Mason, WV - Aug 1977 - - Middleport, OH - May 1981 9,783 Millwood, WV - Aug 1977 - - New Martinsville, WV - Nov 1979 - - New Matamoras, OH - Aug 1977 - - Newport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Pomeroy, OH - Aug 1977 - - Portland, OH - Aug 1977 - - Racine, OH - Aug 1977 - - Ripley, OH - Oct 1978 7,523 - Riverview, WV - Aug 1977 - - St. Mary's, WV - Aug 1977 - - Sardis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sciotoville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sistersville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Syracuse, OH - Aug 1977 - - Waverley, WV - Aug 1977 - - Williamstown, WV - Nov 1979 - - Zanesville, OH - May 1981 - - Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV - Aug 1977 -- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 - Frazeysburg, OH - May 1981 5,000 - Millersburg, OH - May 1981 - - Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 Mud River, WV - Nov 1979 - - Poca, WV - May 1981 - - Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 White Oak Creek, OH - Nov 1981 - - 25-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1986 TABLE 25-H INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS - See Section 33 of Text Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Nov 86 May 86 Athens, OH Aug 86 Bramwell, WV Aug 86 Cairo, WV Sep 86 Canton (Nimishillen), OH Nov 86 Cattletsburg, KY Apr 86 Oct 86 Ceredo-Kenova, WV Apr 86 Oct 86 Chillicothe, OH Dec 85 Aug 86 East Rainelle, WV Aug 86 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Sep 86 Fourpole Creek, WV Jul 85 Galax, VA Aug 86 Grahn, KY Oct 86 Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Dec 84 Hutchins, KY Oct 86 Huntington, WV Jan 86 Oct 86 Inez, KY Oct 85 Ironton, OH Apr 86 Oct 86 Jacksonsburg, Fishing Creek, WV Aug 85 Maysville, KY May 86 Nov 86 Montcalm, WV Aug 86 Newark, OH Aug 85 Sep 86 Olive Hill, KY Oct 86 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Oct 84 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Oct 86 Parkersburg, WV May 86 Nov 86 Pax, WV Aug 86 Point Pleasant, WV Apr 86 Oct 86 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Apr 85 Prestonsburg, KY Jan 86 Jun 86 Princeton, WV Aug 86 Richwood and Fenwick, WV Aug 86 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Jan 86 Ripley, WV Sep 86 Roseville, OH Jul 86 Russel, KY Apr 86 Oct 86 Smithfield, WV Sep 86 South Williamson, KY May 86 Nov 86 Utica, OH Sep 86 West Union, Middle Island, WV Sep 86 Williamson, WV May 86 Nov 86 25-22 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Allegheny River, PA ...................... 26-2 2. Construction of locks and dams, Ohio River .............................. 26-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV ............ 26-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River ............. 26-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV ....................... 26-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects ......... 26-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Allegheny River, Oil City, PA ............... 26-3 8. Chartiers Creek, PA ...................... 26-3 9. Elkins, WV ............................. 26-4 10. Girty's Run, Millvale, PA ................. 26-4 11. Johnstown, PA .......................... 26-4 12. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................. 26-5 13. Root Creek, Bolivar, NY ................... 26-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ............................. 26-5 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-6 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-6 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-6 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY .............. 26-7 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................. 26-7 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ..................... 26-7 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH ............. 26-8 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ......................... 26-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) .............................. 26-8 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ................... 26-9 Flood Control (Continued) Page 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, W V .............................. 26-9 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ......................... 26-10 27. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA ........................ 26-10 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................. 26-11 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD .................... 26-11 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects .............................. 26-11 31. Other authorized flood control projects ....... 26-11 32. Flood control work under special authorization .......................... 26-12 General Investigations 33. Surveys ............................... 26-12 34. Collection and study of basic data ........... 26-12 35. Research and development ................ 26-12 Tables Table 26-A Cost & Financial Statement .......... 26-13 Table 26-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 26-17 Table 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . 26-21 Table 26-D Not Applicable....................... Table 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 26-22 Table 26-F Not Applicable....................... Table 26-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 26-23 Table 26-H Allegheny River Statistics ........... 26-24 Table 26-I Monongahela River Statistics ........ 26-25 Table 26-J Monongahela River Total Costs ....... 26-26 Table 26-K Ohio River Basin Local Protection Projects ......................... 26-26 Table 26-L Ohio River Basin Reservoirs ......... 26-27 Table 26-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 26-28 Table 26-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... . 26-29 26-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. There are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Study for replacement of locks and dams for middle and lower reach of river is being conducted as part of the continuing study of the entire Monongahela River Basin. The Reconnaissance Report on the Monongahela River Navigation System, Stage I Studies was submitted in Jan. 1981. A Feasibility Study Interim Report on the Monongahela River Navigation System was submitted in Jan. 1984. A public meeting was held in Oct. 1983. A General Design Memorandum for the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 on the Monongahela River was completed in August 1986. A General Design Memorandum for Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) is scheduled for completion in February 1987. Operation and maintenance, general: Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 26-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were 8293,486,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1986 are $526,816,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 26-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. ALLEGHENY RIVER, OIL CITY, PA Location. Oil City is located in Venango County, PA at the junction of Oil Creek and the Allegheny River (Allegheny river mile 132.1). (See Geological Survey Chart for Oil City, PA.) Existing project. To alleviate the long-standing ice jam flooding problems in Oil City, a floating ice control structure has been located on the Allegheny River about one-half mile upstream from the mouth of Oil Creek. It consists of a series of 23 floating steel pontoons (each 20' x 3' x 1.25') and 24 steel cylindrical floats connected together by 2 1/4 inch diameter corrosion resistant steel cables. The cables are attached to a junction plate in the center of the Allegheny River and four anchors (two on each side) on the river banks. During non-winter months, one half of the structure is disengaged from its anchor to permit navigation. A Detailed Project Report Supplement addressing the ice formation problem on Oil Creek was submitted in September 1985. Estimated first cost for project is $1,143,000 of which $1,122.000 is Federal cost and $21,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The City of Oil City is responsible for the acquisition of required project land interests and the operation and maintenance of the ice control structures. By early Sep. 1982, the City had acquired all the necessary rights-of-way for the Allegheny River structure. River structure was removed, repaired, repainted and reinstalled beginning in August, 1986 by the city. Operations during fiscal year. Installation of Allegheny River structure with all new additional components included was completed in Oct. 1983. Cumulative flood damages prevented by the project were estimated to be $24,000 to end of fiscal year. 8. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was Completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit I was 26-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rightsof- way. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project through September 30, 1986, totaled $15,766,000. 9. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started May 1946 and completed May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Trash boom, destroyed in 1985 flood, will be replaced. Project was last inspected in June 1986. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1986, totaled $14,311,000. 10. GIRTY'S RUN, MILLVALE, PA Location. Girtys Run rises in the Fox Ridge area of the southern portion of McCandless Township, Allegheny County, and flows generally southeast through Ross and Shaler Townships and the Borough of Millvale to enter the Allegheny River from the right bank at River Mile 3.6 above the "Point" at Pittsburgh. (See U.S Geological Survey chart for Pittsburgh, PA, East.) Existing project. To decrease flooding conditions in the Borough of Millvale area, project consists of lowering the existing channel bottom within the limits of the existing walls. The lowering was accomplished by a 16-foot average bottom width of cut in rock or overburden averaging 4 feet in depth in the lower 2,750 feet of the project and 2 1/2 feet in depth for the remaining portion. Existing masonry walls of the channel were replaced and/or stabilized where required. Construction of project complete on June 26, 1980. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Federal cost is $2,000,000; estimated non-Federal cost of lands, easements and rights-of-way, utility adjustments, and amount in excess of $2 million limitation established by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, is estimated at $1,361,722. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and. the County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, have each agreed to provide to the Borough of Millvale 50% of all estimated non-Federal costs, currently estimated at $1,361,722. To date, nonfederal contributions have totaled $701,722; a formal request for the additional $660,000 has been presented to the Borough of Millvale. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the project started July 11, 1976 with a scheduled completion date of November 22, 1977; however, by that date the contract work had progressed to only about 50% of completion and it was found necessary to terminate that contract for default due to unsatisfactory and untimely performance. Subsequently, a new contract for completion of the remaining work was made on May 4, 1978 and work was completed July 26, 1980 at a cost of $2,091,522.95. Formal hearings were held on July 26, 1978 before the Division Engineer and July 8-15, 1980, inclusive, before the Engineer Board of Contract Appeals regarding the appeal of the defaulted contractor. In July 1982, an agreement was reached with the surety and default contractor regarding the liability resulting from the termination. Modification effecting settlement and release stipulation was finalized, resulting in payment to Government of $464,340.66. Cumulative flood damages prevented were estimated to be $140,000 to September 30, 1986. 11. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accom- 26-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT modate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations were made. Project was last inspected in April, 1986. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $417,926,000 to end of September 1986. 12. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government, have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations and inspections were made. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $28,738,000 to end of September 1986. 13. ROOT CREEK, BOLIVAR, NY Location. The problem area was located in the southwestern portion of the State of New York in the Village of Bolivar, Allegany County, about 17 road miles east of Olean, New York. (See Geological Survey Chart of Olean, NY.) Existing project. Flooding of the Village of Bolivar from Root Creek causes estimated annual damages in the amount of about $53,000. The project consists of 3,230 feet of Root Creek channel modification, including moderate widening, deepening and slope protection. The plan provides Bolivar with protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 100 years. Total first cost of the plan is estimated to be $1,250,000. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. Final EIS filed with CEQ on March 11, 1976. The Detailed Project Report was approved April 29, 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Assurances were executed by the State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation and accepted by the Department of the Army on March 23, 1977. All interests in real estate required for project construction are available. Utility adjustments were completed by NYDEC. Land acquired for project consists of 7.809 acres. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of Bolivar Flood Protection Project was awarded Sep 17, 1979 for $945,077.71. Construction was completed on July 6, 1982 and turned over to local interests on 22 February 1984. Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $778,000; total benefits through September 30, 1986, $217,695,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 26-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 15. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7,618.1 acres in fee and 518.5 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $20,134,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1986 are $560,914,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 16. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,563.6 acres in fee and 99.98 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of Water Supply and Waste Water Systems was awarded on 13 January 1986 for $399,700 and is scheduled for completion on 3 March 1987. Contract for construction of Maintenance Complex and Administration Building was awarded on 23 September 1986 for $896,149 and is scheduled for completion on 29 January 1988. Contract for construction of New Restrooms was awarded on 18 September 1985 for $283,590 and is scheduled for completion on 22 December 1986. Operation and maintenance, general: Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 2 is scheduled for completion in June 1987. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $3,726,000; total benefits through September 30, 1986 are $123,941,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. By letter dated Aug 14, 1981, the Commonwealth of PA relinquished their lease having jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area effective Oct 1, 1981. 17. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA, on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and lowwater regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gatecontrolled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $615,000; total benefits through September 30, 1986 are $32,026,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of publicuse facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 26-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 18. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA - NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaraugus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.4 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Stilling Basin Rehabilitation contract awarded Jul 6, 1983 for $1,278,600 was completed on Dec 10, 1983. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $6,824,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $329,633,000. Of 2,212 surface tracts authorized for acquisition, all have been acquired but are subject to a final audit. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,334.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $5,205,000; total benefits to September 30, 1986, $165,568,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, Pa, 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in February 1939 and completed in June 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first cost of initial wildlife development. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Each cooperating authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacement without cost 26-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost-sharing for Construction of Fishing Access Area awarded in Sep 1980 was completed in Jul 1981 for $335,405.75. Cost-sharing contract for Construction of Hunting Access Areas awarded Jul 30, 1980 was completed on Nov 25, 1981 at a final cost of $44,540. Costsharing contract for Construction of Milton Loop Recreation Area awarded Jul 29, 1981 was completed on Sep 17, 1982 for $467,842. $500,086 has been contributed by local interests towards cost-sharing developments. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $4,541,000; total to September 30, 1986, $155,577,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 21. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location: Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, lowwater regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolledearth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Construction of dam and access road was started in May 1963 and completed in November 1966. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres in fee and easements over 27.9 areas. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal cost of completed project was $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Local Cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $500,986.19 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,394,026.19 towards total of $5,200,000 non-Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 8 wis completed in Dec 1982 and approved by division in Jan 1983. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $983,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1986 are $76,422,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-water regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolledearthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.6 acres in fee and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $1,148,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1986 are $59,818,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. 26-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 26-B, 26-K and 26-L on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $30,558,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1986 are $700,801,000. 24. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA, and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,632.2 acres in fee and easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,223,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1986 are $18,901,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam would be of the concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works will consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway will be uncontrolled. Storage capacity will be 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1986) is $208,000,000 (includes $20,070,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Surface land acquired for project consists of 20,839 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,200,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $15,870,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $1,117,500, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the City of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation costsharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 vas contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Relocation of US Rt. 30, Section 2 contract, awarded Sep 12, 1984, progressed to 94% completion. Relocation of US Rt. 30, Section 3 contract, awarded Mar 26, 1985 for $5,926,755, 26-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 progressed to 78% completion. Contract for Relocation of WV Rt. 44 and Associated Routes, awarded Feb 18, 1986 for $4,605,724, progressed to 18% completion. Contract for construction of Dam, awarded Jul 29 1983 for $15,985,064, scheduled for completion by Sep 5, 1987, progressed to 93% completion. Construction of Equitable Gas Company Access Roads, Phase II, awarded May 31, 1985 for $1,267,138, progressed to 97% completion. Construction of Equitable Gas Company Access Roads, Phase III, awarded Mar 25, 1986 for $1,250,662 progressed to 22% completion. Costreimbursable contract with Equitable Gas Company for Phase II Piping Work was negotiated and awarded on March 8, 1985, for an estimated amount of $4,276,808, progressed to 56% completion. Contract for Relocation of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Track and Appurtenances, awarded Jun 18, 1985 for $3,496,215, progressed to 86% completion. Costreimbursable contract with Baltimore and Ohio Railroad for Track Raise and Communication Lines was negotiated and awarded on January 22, 1985 for an estimated amount of $405,000, progressed to 64% completion. Cost-reimbursable contract with Consolidated Gas Transmission Corporation for Relocation, Removal or Abandonment and Subordination of Gas Pipelines, Gas Production Wells and Access Roads was negotiated in July 1984, for an estimated amount of $2,725,000, is scheduled to be completed by September 1987. Roanoke Elementary School construction contract, awarded Aug 1, 1984 for $3,193,000 was completed on July 17, 1986. Contract for construction of Maintenance Complex, Roanoke Bay Recreation Area, awarded June 10, 1986 for $1,989,000 progressed to 2% completion. Contract for Reservoir Clearing was awarded on September 26, 1986 for $1,114,000. Surface land acquired for the project consists of 20,839 acres. Land acquisition, detailed engineering work and construction continued and all items of work were progressing on schedule. Estimated flood control benefits through September 30, 1986 were $28,555,000. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local Cooperation: None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $5,250,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1986 are $172,325,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled sidechannel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the costsharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,458.4 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 26-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $550,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1986 are $14,419,000. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolledearth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a tworeservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek Lake is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Construction of Sanitary Tie-In, Saegertown Authority, awarded Sep 14, 1984 for $549,549, was completed on May 22, 1986. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $185,000; total through September 30, 1986 is $1,607,000. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. A license was issued Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation and maintenance, general: Design Memorandum No. 1, Master Plan was completed in Aug 1981 and approved by division on Nov 15, 1982. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $19,929,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1986 are $151,905,000. Activities under reservoir management' program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 26-M for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $41,330. Total cost to September 30, 1986 was $970,547. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 26-E on other authorized flood control projects. 26-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 26-N. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 26-N. For Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 32, Public Law 251, 93rd Cong.) See Table 26-N. For Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974 (Sec. 54, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress) See Table 26-N. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Disaster Preparedness $134,215 Rehabilitation: Buckhannon, WV. 59,618 Elkins, Randolph County, WV. 6,567 Advance Measures: Parsons, WV 194,687 Total cost for fiscal year: $395,087 General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Flood control studies Review of authorized projects Coordination with other agencies Special investigations Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Continuation of Planning and Engineering: Grays Landing Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 7), Monongahela River, PA. Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8), Monongahela River, PA and WV Total cost for fiscal year: $1,826,013 4,956 18,143 105,376 53,522 963,898 380,678 $3,35 2,5 86 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $181,682 for flood plain management services and $6,116 for related hydrologic studies. 35. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 26-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 1986 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River New Work PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3. Monongahela New Work River, PA and Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 5. Tygart Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Allegheny River New Work Oil City, PA Approp. Cost 8. Chartiers New Work Creek, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 9. Elkins, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Girty's Run, New Work Millvale, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 11. Johnstown, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Punxsutawney, New Work Ohio River Approp. Basin, PA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 13. Root Creek, New Work Bolivar, NY Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3,270,300 3,248,945 3,788,000 3,762,006 80 - 7,665,440 8,496,900 7,260,530 8,375,983 - -120,000 66,402 44,567 103,046 710,000 642,587 -417,500 -195,337 689,500 700,570 349,000 98,000 620,143 244,784 -18,376 5,221 5,221 26,508 - 6,000 5,488 4,181 - -3,000 19 - 376,000 131,000 127,912 314,450 308,000 28,711 -5,000 102,047 -2,500 56 1,048,000 1,110,833 -6,000 263,795 18,426 3,971,500 4 4,037,823 4 39 8,960,000 9 9,613,100 10 1,698 12 642,000 705,320 69,000 1 68,648 41,764 8,000 9,619 -56,591 19,281 1,988 12,104 2,172 ,975,000 ,986,772 18,157,860' 18,157,860' 58,336,3622 58,312,4192 400,000 129,603,0853 209,436 129,412,5214 ,721,852 146,156,4065 ,063,705 146,044,0506 - 15,857,000 7 15,856,779 - 19,077,9327 - 19,077,9327 726,400 8,763,2396 741,774 8,738,293" 20,000 1,311,000 95,599 1,283,967 - 26,586,186 5,134 26,560,187 - 4,225,188 - 4,204,498 - 1,772,627 - 1,772,627 3,500 231,987 2,838 230,799 - 2,662,000 - 2,648,849 - 701,722 - 701,722 - 8,865,3889 - 8,865,3889 7,000 3,810,205 7,098 3,810,005 - 3,586,107 '" - 3,586,107"' 8,000 1,022,888" 8,346 1,022,780" -5,949 787 1,591,436 1,591,436 - - - 8,739,98712 - -- - 8,739,98712 1,259,000 1,425,500 1,366,700 14,888,983' 3 1,025,185 1,610,473 1,397,114 14,822,58413 26-13 TABLE 26-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 1986 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 23. Ohio River Basin, Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 190,398 476,000 529,107 33,500 1,041 1,125,000 1,217,561 -4,000 7,405 670,100 460,055 63,000 68,849 1,236,200 1,186,299 892,617 804,423 703,184 915,649 -5,162 1,129,000 1,120,473 1,050,000 948,001 -20,000 100,519 1,131,100 1,146,746 84,066 531,000 540,383 42 765,000 455,236 1,214 1,203,000 1,163,944 2,000,000 1,399,020 -5,000 411 826,577 1,001,587 -190,000 -95,443 584,000 546,449 659,100 808,210 742,091 717,000 768,355 880,435 26,610 1,726,000 1,713,527 452,500 586.993 8,286 1,065,500 1,138,420 5,000 229,472 940,705 919,272 30,160 30,160 780,500 803,900 580,807 768,377 46,012,411 '4 46,012,411' 4 7,265,904 7,235,107 43,001 4,474,524 '5 - 4,431,52315 2,619,000 12,380,92116 2,701,478 12,330,968'6 - 9,539,586' 7 - 9,539,58617 539,482 7,237,85718 514.479 7,198,07818 1,083,000 1,115,419 -100,000 230,032 953,700 999,266 650,200 656,660 655,500 652,378 536,000 523,000 514,500 683,000 513,256 531,555 538,675 672,132 72 1,357,000 1,391,237 - -10,500 1,239,000 2,089,000 1,270,706 2,117,222 2,019,000 2,068,686 109,309,07619 109,298,20519 14,495,278 14,472,946 3,140,000 2,911,351 5,727,53120 5,727,53120 10,272,25621 10,241,44021 7,144,97322 7,138,81423 7,378,516 7,337,928 47,033 47,033 17,376,09724 17,376,09724 6,985,29625 6,964,45025 4,253,02926 4,253,02926 6,444,864 6,405,116 985,19727 985,19727 40,227,20128 40,209,89428 16,640,6172 16,576,72829 26-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 1986 25. Stonewall Jack- New Work son Lake, Ohio Approp. 21,500,000 22,300,000 25,300,000 24,106,000 159,716,200 River Basin,WV Cost 20,229,662 21,414,527 26,553,633 25,450,413 159,155,299 26. Tionesta Lake, New Work Ohio River Approp. 278,000 17,000 -17,286 -32,403 7,792,37830 Basin, PA Cost 436,326 218,519 41,048 - 7,788,3793' Maint. Approp. 898,000 1,025,000 811,000 1,060,000 11,263,95332 Cost 785,005 895,102 1,049,901 1,074,808 11,226,83932 27. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 246,000 345,000 417,000 512,000 3,022,668 Cost 244,224 288,948 445,085 528,818 2,992,693 28. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. - 540,000 23,398 5,376 20,553,47433 River Basin, PA Cost 313,216 194,349 392,820 137,846 20,538,568"4 Maint. Approp. 538,500 582,900 592.000 749,000 5,178,271'" Cost 537,291 555,237 613,235 751,253 5,139,3173" 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake, Approp. 277,000 5,000 -6,112 -10,959 12,521,167 6 Ohio River Cost 27,096 279,125 7,397 2,334 12,521,167" Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,527,500 1,229,200 1,253,000 2,602,000 16,532,389 : Cost 1,119,522 1,561,741 1,312,586 2,409,684 16,275,948"' 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. 'Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects and $400,000 appropriated to Grays Landing, L/D 7, PA in FY 1986. 4. Includes $209,436 expended for Grays Landing, L/D 7, PA in FY 1986. 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $461,466 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $269,635 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $555,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,394,026.19 for new work contributed by local interest. 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,299,077 Code 711 funds, ($252,761 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 33. Includes $1,679,774 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,664,869 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26-16 TABLE 26-A (Continued) PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. June 26, 19342 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Mar 3, 1899 Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. June 13, 1902 Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Mar 3, 1905 Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Mar 3, 1905 Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Mar 2, 1907 Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 3. May 17, 1950 5. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruct dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15, inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservior for low water regulation and flood control ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) Aug 5, 1886 For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) June 3, 1896 For locks and dams 2 and 3. 26-17 July 25, 1912 For locks and dams 4 to 8. inclusive. July 3, 1930 For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 22, 70th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Aug 30, 1935' Aug 30, 1935' 3. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 28, 1938 11. Jun 28, 1938 12. Jun 28, 1938 14. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 15. Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun. 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 16. Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun. 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 17. 18. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenances of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act. of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 26-18 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water, regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee, of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other Flood Control Committee, purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. Ohio River Basin. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in 2d sess. tributary basins. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., plan including additional projects in tributary basins. 1st sess. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. Ohio River Basin. 1st Sess. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 88-253, plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. 88th Cong., 1st sess. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive H. Doc., 6755, 89th Cong., plan for Ohio River Basin. 1st sess. May 12. 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 90-17. plan for Ohio River Basin. 90th Cong., 1st sess. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive Public Law 90-483, plan for Ohio River Basin. 90th Cong., 2d sess. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 11. Doc. 15166. 91st Cong.. plan for Ohio River Basin. 2d sess. Mar 7. 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive 11. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong.. plan for Ohio River Basin. River Basin Monetary Oct 22. 1976 Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pla. 26-19 Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources I)evelopment Act of 1976; IPublic Law 94-587. Sec. 101(a). TABLE 26-B (Continued) H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 20. 21. 22. 23. e i e REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 24. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. regulation and recreation. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act as amended of 1944 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Nov 7, 1966 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. 2nd Sess. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Jun 22, 1936 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. amended by water regulation. 1st Sess. Jun 28, 1938 FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act as amended of 1944 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. and storage for water quality control. 2nd Sess. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act as amended of 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief Administration program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 26-20 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH' 6 Inactive 1938 - - Buckhannon River, WV 2 3 Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV2 3 Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD 6 Inactive 1971 47,195 ' 185,6685 1. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. No Commerce reported. 4. Previous project data. 5. Includes $1.700 expended under previous project. 6. Eligible for deauthorization. 26-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegany, NY, unit I (Allegheny River) Deferred - 4,100 - Allegany, NY, unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) Deferred 1975 64,851 - Amsterdam, OH' Completed 1964 183,072 - Benwood, WV2 Deferred 1954 81,028 - Big Run, PA' Completed 1965 364,208 - Black Fork at Hendricks, WV' Inactive 1972 6,800 - Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA Inactive - - - Bradford, PA Completed 1962 7,601,763 - Brookville, PA Completed 1963 964,976 - Buckhannon, WV Completed 1972 1,568,661 - Burgettstown, PA' Completed - 83,129 - Butler, PA Completed 1970 1,556,181 - DuBois, PA Completed 1979 4,465,200 - Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH 2 Inactive - 100,000 - Empire-Stratton, OH 2 Inactive - 33,031 - Friendsville, MD' Completed - 41,529 - Granville, PA' Completed - 75,908 - Johnsonburg, PA Completed 1958 674,664 - Kittanning, PA, part I Completed 1949 130,317 - Latrobe, PA Completed 1951 207,659 - Latrobe, PA Completed 1970 2,556,652 - Leetonia, OH' Completed - 89,299 - Leetsdale, PA Inactive - - - Martins Ferry, OH 2 Inactive 1941 25,164 - Moundsville, WV2 Inactive - - - Muddy Creek Dam, PA 2 4 Inactive 1977 402,459 - Neville Island, PA Inactive - - - New Kensington and Parnassus, PA Inactive - - - Oakdale, PA' Inactive - 14,127 - Oil City, PA' Completed - 43,595 - Olean, NY Completed 1954 3,217,531 - Portage, PA Completed 1965 150,386 - Portville, NY Completed 1954 2,070,484 - Powhatan Point, OH2 Inactive - - - Proctor, 1WV2 Inactive - - - Reynoldsville, PA Completed 1959 385,494 - Ridgway, PA (Elk Creek) Completed 1964 628,888 - Ridgway and vicinity, PA (on Clarion River)' 4 Active 1979 132,464 - Rochester, PA Inactive - - - Rouseville, PA' Inactive 1,642 - Rowlesburg Lake, WV3 Active 1977 2,857,575 - Salamanca, NY Completed 1972 2,880,535 - Slovan, PA' Completed - 57,811 - Sykesville, PA' Completed - 184,246 - Tarentum, PA' Completed 1964 136,591 - Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA' Completed 1981 1,554,428 - Turtle Creek, PA Completed 1972 15,350,552 - Uniontown, PA2 Inactive 1956 - - Wallace, WV' 3 Inactive - 11,035 - Warwood, WV2 Inactive - - Washington, PA Completed 1964 789,093 - Wellsville, OH, Sec. I Completed 1956 483,910 - Wellsville, OH, Sec. II Completed 1956 157,633 - Weston Mills, Olean, NY' 4 Active - 50,100 - Weston Mills, Portville, NY' Active - 52,100 - Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)2 Inactive - - - Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)2 Inactive - 21,700 - Wheeling, WV2 Inactive 1954 189,067 - Wilmore, PA' Completed - 96,853 - Woodlands, WV 2 Inactive - - - Youngstown, OH Completed 1976 3,621,134 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Lacks local support. 2. Eligible for deauthorization. 4. No longer economically justified. 26-22 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) - Aug 5, 1977 13,452 - Bellaire, OH - May 6, 1981 76,487 - Brilliant, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) - Aug 5, 1977 194 - Clarington, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - Coraopolis, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) - Aug 5, 1977 16,884 - Follansbee, WV - Aug 5, 1977 - - Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) - Aug 5, 1977 - - Industry, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) - Nov 6, 1977 - - Lake Chautauqua and Chadokoin River, NY2 1965 Mar 2, 1970 190,722 - Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA 1972 May 6, 1981 1,342,000 - McKees Rocks, PA - Oct 3, 1978 - - Mingo Junction, OH - Aug 5, 1977 - - New Cumberland, WV - Aug 5, 1977 - - Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) - Oct 3, 1978 - - Redbank Creek Lake, PA - Aug 5, 1977 156,377 - St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) - Aug 5, 1977 13,529 - Smith Ferry, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Wellsburg, WV - Aug 5, 1977 6,387 - West Bridgewater, PA - Aug 5, 1977 - - Wilcox, PA' - Mar 5, 1955 16,761 - 1. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Feb. 20, 1951. 2. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 26-23 TABLE 26-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level-- Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick. PA 56 360 13.5 734.5 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona. PA 56 360 10.5 745.0 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport. PA 56 360 11.8 756.8 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.2 769.0 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.1 782.1 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton. PA 56 360 17.9 800., 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer. PA 56 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $15,630,637 Abandoned lock and dam I 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 'Total $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. O 0OzE Cl TABLE 26-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above her Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $17,872,212 7 110 720 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 563 360 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19533 17,538,315' 8 720 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 563 360 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17,254,071' 6 720 - 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam. 843 720 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 30,110,889 Maxwell, PA - 82.2 Grays Landing lock 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete - - 1,012,436 and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA 56 360 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2,639,8045 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA 56 360 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19252 6,027,253' 102.0 Morgantown lock and 84 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1950 8,778,000' dam, Morgantown, WV - 108.0 Hildebrand lock and 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1959 12,506,829' dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV - 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam, 84 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 25,179,622' 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc. 250,000' Abandoned lock and dam 1 1,019,907' Abandoned lock and dam 4 780,816' Abandoned lock and dam 5 1,074,812' Abandoned lock and dam 6 770,449' Abandoned lock and dam 7 213,776' Abandoned lock and dam 8 245,900' Abandoned lock and dam 9 191,000' Abandoned lock and dam 10 210,445' Abandoned lock and dam 11 227,668' Abandoned lock and dam 12 200,550' Abandoned lock and dam 13 190,6916 Abandoned lock and dam 14 210,127' Abandoned lock and dam 15 175,8296 Dredging 587,8996 Total 145,269,3006 01 t 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8, inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of lock. 5. Actual cost; may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,856,779 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000). REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 26-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $139,848,75913 $125,121,5492 $264,970,308' 2 3 Maintenance and operation - 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $139,848,75913 $125,596,7212 $265,445,480' 2 3 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 3. Includes $15,856,779 for major rehabilitation of L/D3 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and $209,436 for replacement of L/D7. and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 26-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Costs Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Allegany, NY, unit I (Allegheny River)2 Allegany, NY, unit II (Five Mile Creek area)2 Benwood, W V ' 7 14 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA (Allegheny River)' Elkins, W V (Monongahela River Basin)4 5 Empire-Stratton, OH 2 14 Johnsonburg, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Johnstown, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Kittanning, PA, part I (Allegheny River)2 5 Latrobe, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Leetsdale, PA2 Martins Ferry, OH 2 6 14 Moundsville, WV2 14 Neville Island, PA2 New Kensington and Parnassus, PA (Allegheny River)2 Olean, NY (Allegheny River)2 5 Portville, NY (Allegheny River)2 5 Powhatan Point, OH2 1' Proctor, WV2 14 Punxsutawney, PA (Allegheny River Basin)' " Ridgway, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2' Rochester, PA2 Uniontown, PA (Monongahela River Basin)2 14 Warwood, WV2 14 Wellsville, OH, sec. 12 5 Wellsville, OH, sec. II2 5 Wheeling, WV 2 7 14 Levee Channel and levee Wall Wall Channel diversion Internal drainage facilities Wall Channel Wall Channel Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Levee Channel and levee Channel Wall Channel and wall Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee 697,000 980,000 8,500,000 11,800,000 1,772,6273 933,000 674,6643 8,865,3883 130,3173 207,6593 1,270,000 8,630,000 3,070,000 3,210,000 7,900,000 3,217,5313 2,070,4843 4,720,000 334,000 3,586,1073 628,8883 3,350,000 5,820,000 1,740,000 483,9103 157,6333 19,700,000 65,000 133,000 3,180,000 3,080,000 762,000 '0 1,113,000" 11,680,0009 14,880,000 40,000 1,812,627 28,000 961,000 '3 130,000 804,664 - 8,865,3883 2,000 132,317 44,400 252,059 141,000 1,411,000 836,000 9,466,000 605,000 3,675,000 1,830,000 5,040,000 148,000 8,048,000 597,000 3,814,531 353,000 2,423,484 397,000 5,117,000 121,000 455,000 180,4853 3,766,5923 72,000 700,888 622,000 3,972,000 980,000 6,800,00012 376,000 2,116,000 113,000 596,910 - 157,6333 3,460,000 23,160,0009 26-26 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-K (Continued) OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost Type of Location- Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)2 14 Wall 11,700,000 2,700,000 14,400,000 Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)2 14 Wall and levee 13,300,000 2,470,000 15,770,000 Woodlands, WV2 14 Levee 206,000 28,000 234,000 1. All projects are on the Ohio River unless otherwise 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. noted. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 9. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 3. Actual cost. 10. Latest cost estimate revision 1966. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 11. Latest cost estimate revision 1974. 5. Completed. 12. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 6. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1941. 13. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 7. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1954. 14. Eligible for deauthorization. TABLE 26-L OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 23 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA' Conemaugh River $ 46,012,411 '3 Crooked Creek, PA' Crooked Creek 4,431,523 ' 3 East Branch Clarion River, PA' Clarion River 9,539,586 ' 3 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY' Allegheny River 112,209,956 36 Loyalhanna, PA' Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 ' 3 Mahoning Creek, PA' Mahoning Creek 7,138,814 ' 3 Tionesta, PA' Tionesta Creek 7,788,379 ' 3 Union City, PA' French Creek 14,559,800 ' 3 Woodcock Creek, PA' Woodcock Creek 20,538,568 '3 Beaver: Berlin, OH' Mahoning River 8,739,987 ' 3 Eagle Creek, OH2 Eagle Creek 12,700,000 2 4 7 S Michael J. Kirwan, OH' Mahoning River 17,376,097 1 3 Mosquito Creek, OH' Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 ' 3 Shenango River, PA and OH' Shenango River 40,209,894 ' 3 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV' West Fork River 208,000,000 ' 5 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD' Youghiogheny River 12,521,168 ' 3 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 3. Actual cost. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5. Latest cost estimate revision in 1986. 6. Includes $2,911,351 actual cost for Dam Rehabilitation. 7. Inactive. 8. Eligible for deauthorization. 26-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 26-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH October 1985 Leetonia, OH May 1984 Big Run, PA October 1984 Marianna, PA June 1986 Bolivar, NY September 1986 Millvale, PA June 1986 Bradford, PA July 1986 Oil City, PA June 1986 Brookville, PA October 1985 Olean, NY September 1986 Buckhannon, WV September1986 Portage, PA August 1982 Burgettstown-Slovan, PA September 1986 Portvile, NY September 1986 Butler, PA September 1986 Reynoldsville, PA May 1985 Chartiers Creek, PA Ridgway, PA May 1984 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach September 1986 Salamanca, NY September 1986 James G. Fulton Reach May 1985 Stonewgod-Nutter Fort, WV July 1983 Colliers, WV October 1982 Sykesville, PA October 1985 Dubois, PA October 1985 Tarentum, PA November 1976 Eldred, PA June 1983 Turtle Creek, PA March 1986 Friendsville, MD October 1985 Washington, PA September 1986 Granville, PA September 1986 Wellsville, OH September 1986 Johnsonburg, PA May 1984 Weston, WV July 1985 Kittanning, PA August 1983 Wilmore, PA August 1982 Latrobe, PA July 1984 Youngstown, PA October 1985 26-28 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (construction) $ 95,599 Robinson Run, Oakdale, PA (detailed project report) 12,499 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (construction) 787 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (construction) 704 124 Total cost for current fiscal year: $813,009 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Beaver River, Bridgewater, PA (construction) $ 2,522 Brook County, Hooverson Heights (construction) 29,683 Chartiers Creek, Kennedy Township and McKees Rocks Borough, PA (construction) 8,396 Elks Creek, Clarksburg, WV (construction) 11,029 Greene County, Route 88, PA (initial appraisal report) 1,638 Mahoning River, Highway 139A, Trumbull Co., OH (construction) -66 Mahoning River, Warren Township, OH(construction) 11,881 Monongahela River, Granville, WV (construction) 22,781 Trout Run, Portage, PA (construction) 88 Total cost for current fiscal year: $87,942 Streambank Erosion Control, Evaluation and Demonstration - Section 32, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Evaluate Streambank Erosion, Nationwide No Ohio River Main Stem Demonstration Projects Expenditures Ohio River Off Main Stem Demonstration Project This Rehabilitation of Streambank Demonstration Projects, Fiscal Ohio River Year Total cost for current fiscal year: Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Section 54, of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 251, 93rd Congress Fiscal Year Costs Activity Architect/Engineer Contract for Preparation of Three Reports for the Purpose of Disseminating Information on the Section 54 Program. Three Guides to Low Cost Shore Protection for: 1. Engineers and Contractors 2. Local government officials 3. Property owners No Expenditures This Fiscal Year 26-29 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN ............................ 27-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ............................ 27-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN .......................... 27-2 4. St. Croix River, MN & WI ................... 27-2 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN ................ 27-3 6. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN ...................................... 27-3 Flood Control 7. Bassett Creek, MN .............................. 27-4 8. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ............................... 27-4 9. Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN .................... 27-5 10. Chaska, MN ........ ..................... . 27-5 11. Devils Lake, ND .................................. 27-5 12. Eau Galle River, WI .............................. 27-6 13. Enderlin, Maple River, ND .................... 27-6 14. Hanover, Hennepin County, MN............... 27-7 15. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ................. 27-7 16. Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI...........................27-7 17. Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI............... 27-7 18. Lac qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, MN .... 27-8 19. La Farge Lake and channel improvement, WI ............................... 27-8 20. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND .............................. 27-9 21. Lake Darling, .Souris River, ND ............. 27-9 22. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN .......... 27-9 23. Lake Traverse and Bois de Soiux River, SD and MN ............................. 27-10 24. Mankato and North Mankato, MN............ 27-10 25. Middle River at Argyle, MN ................. 27-11 26. Minnesota River at Le Sueur, MN............ 27-11 27. Prairie du Chien, WI ............................ 27-11 28. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN .............. ....... 27-11 29. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND.... 27-12 30. Red River of the North drainage basin, MN, SD & ND ......... ................... 27-12 31. Red River of the North at Halstad, MN ...... 27-13 32. Redwood River at Marshall, MN ............ 27-13 33. Rochester, MN .............. ............... 27-13 34. Roseau River, MN ................................ 27-14 35. Sheyenne River, ND ............................ 27-14 36. Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND ............. 27-14 37. Souris River, Velva, ND ...................... 27-15 38. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI.......... 27-15 39. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN ..... 27-16 40. Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, M N .................................... 27-16 41. Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN.... 27-17 42. Winona, MN ................................... 27-17 43. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................................. 27-18 Miscellaneous 44. Other work under special authority......... 27-18 General Investigations 45. Surveys ................ ......................... 27-18 46. Collection and study of basic data........... 27-18 47. Continuation of planning and engineering... 27-18 48. Advance engineering and design ............ 27-18 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 27-19 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 27-22 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 27-23 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 27-24 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 27-25 Table 27-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River.....................27-26 Table 27-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan ............................ 27-27 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 27-27 Table 27-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................ 27-28 27-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately-owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Snagging and clearing cost $5,337 by hired labor. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $2,248. Condition at end of fiscal year: Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1986, were $4,218,066, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,277,886 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See table 27-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $939,182. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $214,261. Physical security cost $2,816 by hired labor and $4,503 by contract. Periodic inspection, bridge and dike inspection, and dam safety costs were $113,552 by hired labor and $84,552 by contract. Cultural resource investigation cost $5,693 by hired labor and $11,490 by other Corps of Engineers districts. Discharge observation, gage reading and water control analysis cost $90,763 by hired labor. Cooperative stream gaging with U.S. Geological Survey cost $28,220 and by contract, $1,135. Revision of water regulation manuals by contract cost $168,713. Commercial activities studies cost $46,831. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $12,533. Real estate was managed by other Corps of Engineers districts at a cost of $48,278. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $267,686. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 27-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN & WI Location. From source in northwestern Wisconsin, flows southwesterly and then southerly about 164 miles to Mississippi River at Prescott, WI, about 41.7 miles below lower Burlington Northern railway bridge, Minneapolis, MN. For its greater part, forms boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. (See Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) 27-2 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for maintenance of a channel, 9 feet in depth and of suitable width from mouth to Stillwater, MN, 24.5 miles, created by improvement of upper Mississippi River; a channel 3 feet deep at mean low water between Stillwater and Taylors Falls (27.3 miles); improvement of harbor and waterfront at Stillwater; and a small-boat harbor at Hudson, WI, currently classified "inactive." Estimated (1981) Federal cost of new work is $820,400. Latest authorization (1954) for maintenance work on reach between Stillwater and Taylors Falls is limited to an expenditure not exceeding $5,000 per year. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation. ) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion. For Hudson Harbor, see the Annual Report of 1970 for requirements. Terminal facilities. At Stillwater there is a concrete paved levee and a piling-and-timber trestle wharf on right bank. At other points along river, landing may be made on banks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $100. Condition at end of fiscal year: All new work was completed in 1930, except subsequently authorized harbor at Hudson which was reclassified to "inactive" on April 20, 1982. The United States owns 2.75 acres of land in fee at Taylors Falls and has easements over 7.57 acres of land at Bayport, MN. Extension to provide a 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater was completed August 12, 1938, when full pool at dam 3 of Mississippi River canalization project was reached. Minimum draft from Stillwater to Taylors Falls is about 1 foot at extreme low water, and from mouth to Stillwater, 9 feet. Maintenance of the 3-foot channel is limited to requests by the National Park Service which manages this reach under the Wild and Scenic Waterways classification. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Location. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14999). Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $355,200. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for repair and revetment wall cost $8,730. Administrative costs were $870. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. A revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, has deteriorated and will require future maintenance. 6. ZIPPEL BAY LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY, MN Location. Zippel Bay is a natural harbor located in northwestern Minnesota on the south shore of Lake of the Woods near Williams, Minnesota. The navigation project will be located in Zippel Bay State Park. Existing Project. Boats based at a state park, resort, marina, and a number of private residences use Zippel Bay to provide access to the lake. However, the natural channel between the bay and Lake of the Woods varies in depth and width and restricts navigation. The plan of improvement would provide a small-boat access channel between Zippel Bay and Lake of the Woods. Jetties would be constructed on both sides of the channel to minimize the amount of maintenance dredging. The total cost of the project is currently estimated at $751,200, of which the Federal cost is $399,600. Included in this latter are costs to the Corps of Engineers and the Coast Guard. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1985 under the authority contained in Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the local sponsor, in December 1985. Local interests are required to contribute in cash 50 percent of that amount of the total first cost of construction of the general navigation facilities, except aids to navigation, which does not exceed $4,000,000 and all of such costs in excess of $4,000,000; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including the provision of sites, acceptable to the government, of sufficient capacity for the placement of dredged material together with necessary containment dikes or the cost thereof; accomplish all alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, rivers, utilities, and other structures and im- 27-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 provements made necessary by project construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas with depths commensurate with those in the Federal improvements, and necessary mooring facilities, utilities, and public landing with suitable supply and essential sanitary facilities, launching ramps, parking areas, and access roads open to all on equal terms; establish and enforce regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor area by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution protection; provide facilities for onshore disposal of untreated sewage, garbage, debris and other pollutants; comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $70,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration of the construction contract costs were $17,146. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for construction of the small boat navigation project was awarded May 1986. Flood Control 7. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $23,500,000 and $3,867,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, and rights-of-way are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A tunnel FDM by contract cost $77,007, by hired labor, $196,769. Work by the Waterways Experiment Station and North Central Division real estate cost $19,999 and $4,805, respectively. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $24,807. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is complete. 8. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. The project requires sponsorship from both the States of Minnesota and South Dakota. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District on June 10, 1969, and accepted by the District Engineer on November 3, 1969. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District for South Dakota on October 23, 1969, was furnished on November 18, 1969, and accepted by the District Engineer on November 19, 1969. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of Public Law 91-646 were provided by the Upper Minnesota Watershed District on August 13, 1974, and by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District on April 15, 1976. Rights-of way for construction on the Whetstone River and the entire cash contribution of $153,000 for the project were furnished by the local sponsors on December 21, 1981. 27-4 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minnesota River channel construction contract costs were $43,097. A Big Stone Lake outlet and silt barrier contract cost $56,000. Engineering and design, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $122,348. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $60,262 by hired labor and $90 by contract. Data collection, water control analysis and maintenance of stream gaging cost $8,797, $8,543 and $1,833, respectively. Data collection by other government agencies cost $39,029. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $5,852. Dam failure planning cost $33,030 by other districts. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $174 and $16,257, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the new dam above Highway 75 and roads are completed. Surveys for land lines are complete, and the land acquisition program is complete. The first land payment was made on November 28, 1969, and 128 tracts have been purchased. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. Construction on the Whetstone River portion of the upstream works is complete. The construction contract for the Minnesota River work is substantially complete. 9. BLACK BEAR AND MILLER LAKES, CROW WING COUNTY, MN Location. Black Bear and Miller Lakes are near the center of the State, 20 miles north of Brainerd, Minnesota. The two lakes lie adjacent to the left (east) bank of the Mississippi River. Miller Lake is linked to Black Bear Lake by a very short channel. In turn, Black Bear Lake is joined to the Mississippi River by a one-half mile creek. Existing project. Spring high water on the Mississippi River backs up the creek channel, flooding shoreline properties and causing damages to buildings and related facilities. Some flooding is experienced here every 3 to 5 years. The project consists of an embankment across the creek approximately 300 feet upstream of its juncture with the MississippiRiver. This structure will have a culvert extending through it which would be closed off during periods of high flow on the Mississippi River. Residences around the two lakes would be protected up to the 500-year flood elevation on the Mississippi River with 3 feet of freeboard. Total Federal cost for the project is estimated at $350,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Crow Wing County, the local sponsor, in July 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $204,575. Engineering and design cost $20,229 by hired labor and $13,120 by contract. Supervision and administration costs were $7,060. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of a flood protection project at Black Bear and Miller Lakes is currently underway. 10. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion and bypass channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.3 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 0.3 mile of flood bypass channel, and a 1,500-foot conduit on East Creek. Approximately 1.6 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $19,400,000 and $2,425,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required prior to the start of construction. By letter of August 19, 1982, the City of Chaska indicated its willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation. By letter of October 16, 1985, the City of Chaska indicated its intent to participate voluntarily in project financing as proposed in legislation being considered by Congress. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $52,066. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Plans and specifications for the first stage of construction are complete. 11. DEVILS LAKE, ND Location. In Ramsey County in north central North Dakota about 80 miles west of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Involves a system of levees and interior flood control facilities at the head of Creel Bay. The main embankment across Creel Bay is 1,810 feet 27-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 long and varies from 0 to 27 feet high. The south Creel Bay tieback embankment is 1,030 feet long and varies from 0 to 3 feet high. The north Creel Bay tieback embankment is 2,400 feet long and varies from 0 to 8.5 feet high. The south embankment is 3,100 feet long and varies from 0 to 9.5 feet high. The interior flood control system consists of temporary stormwater retention ponds immediately north and south of the city's sewage lagoons, a 16,000 gallon per minute pumping station and a system of ditches and culverts linking the ponds to the pumping station. Total Federal cost (1986) for the project is estimated at $2,570,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 15, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Devils Lake in August 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $880. Engineering and design cost $55,533 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $33,711. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction work on the project is substantially complete. 12. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $180,966 by hired labor and $16,023 by contract. Recreational maintenance contracts cost $53,626. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $9,850. Data collection cost $3,057 by hired labor and $7,254 by other government agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts cost $8,609 and $76,682, respectively. Maintenance of stream gaging cost $1,565. Commercial activities studies cost $8,994. Administrative and other miscellaneous engineering costs were $105,408. Condition at end of fiscal year: Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964: minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in April 1982. 13. ENDERLIN, MAPLE RIVER, ND Location. In Ransom County in southeastern North Dakota on the Maple River about 45 miles southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project at Enderlin involves a system of levees along the right bank of the main stem and the left bank of the South Branch of the Maple River. The total levee system would be about 1.2 miles long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Other features of the project include channel improvements on the south branch, replacement of the Soo Line railroad bridge, and interior drainage facilities consisting of three ponding areas with gated outlet conduits. To prevent failure of the channel and levee by erosion, rip-rapping would be provided in selected reaches. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1982, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See page 27-5 of Annual Report for 1982 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Enderlin in July 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A Phase III Highway 46 frontage road levee contract cost $11,498. A Phase IV contract on the south branch of the Maple River cost $284,476. A relocations contract with the Soo Line RR cost $61,446. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $1,649. North Central Division real estate costs were $816. Supervision and administration cost $1,784. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project is substantially complete. 27-6 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 14. HANOVER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Location. Hanover is in south-central Minnesota in northwest Hennepin County and eastern Wright County. The erosion project is located along the right bank of the Crow River adjacent to the Hanover Dam in the city of Hanover. Existing project. County State Aid Highway #19 is located on top of the bank of the Crow River and is in danger of being lost due to continuing erosion. The proposed project would consist of placement of fill to reconstruct the bank and riprap to protect this bank. The total Federal cost (1986) of the project is estimated at $222,100. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in May 1986 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Hennepin County, Minnesota, the local sponsor, in August 1986. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; accomplish all alterations and relocations of streets, highways, sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide all costs in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and administrative costs were $23,960. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for construction of the erosion protection project at Hanover was awarded in September 1986. 15. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, eand North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1285 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non- Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $83,257. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 16. IRVING TOWNSHIP AT NICOLS ROAD, JACKSON COUNTY, WI Location. In Jackson County in west central Wisconsin on the Black River, approxmately 6 miles south of Black River Falls. The project site is near Nicols Road. Existing project. Erosion was threatening Nicols Road in Irving Township, Wisconsin. The project protects the road and consisted of the placement of rockfill at the toe of the eroding bank and revegetation of the upper part of the river bank. The project was approved for construction in May 1985, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. Local cooperation agreements were adopted by Irving Township in July 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $27,217. A construction contract cost $116,993. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction was completed in July 1986. 17. KICKAPOO RIVER, GAYS MILLS, wI Location. Left bank of Kickapoo River, in Gays Mills, in southwestern Wisconsin. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion which threatens a sewage treatment digestion tank is authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial ap- 27-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 praisal report, dated September 1985, recommended protection with 150 cubic yards of gravel bedding and 300 yards of riprap along about 200 feet of eroding river bank. The project was approved for construction by the Office Chief of Engineers on June 18, 1986. Total Federal cost of the project is estimated at $33,000. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was adopted by the Village of Gays Mills, Wisconsin, in August 1986. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; accomplish all alterations and relocations of streets, highways, sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide all costs in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work; A construction contract cost $14,100. Engineering and design and other study costs were $8,545. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for slope protection was awarded in September 1986. Project was 50 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 18. LAC QUI PARLE LAKE MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1291 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $460,475. A gate operator equipment contract cost $60,656 and a bank stability contract for the Chippewa Diversion cost $410,662. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 19. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See page 1087 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $68,208 including a contract for the removal of five bridges deemed unsafe for $10,000. Condition at end of fiscal year: General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. Funds to complete the authorized project have been withheld and all further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was completed early FY 1985. On the basis of the study results, it was recommended that no further work be done to establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement project be deauthorized. 27-8 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 20. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1287 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See page 1288 of Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations, monitoring and evaluations were performed at a cost of $392,749 by hired labor and $-7,673 by contract. Dam instrumentation, stability and safety assurance cost $342,711. Real Estate Management by the North Central Division cost $24,432. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service coordination cost $680. Data collection cost $10,316 by hired labor and $42,524 by other government agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts and hired labor cost $21,749 and $6,124, respectively. Dam safety engineering and design cost $93,754 by contract and $44,181 by hired labor. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $111,170. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. 21. LAKE DARLING, SOURIS RIVER, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam, which is to be raised, is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The Lake Darling project provides for raising Lake Darling design pool by approximately 4 feet. The project also provides for other work on the Souris River such as levee improvements at Velva, Sawyer, and six subdivision areas between Burlington and Minot, floodproofing of rural residences, modification of refuge structures in the Upper Souris and J. Clark Salyer Refuges, and bridge stabilizations relocations in the reservoir. The work is a portion of the Burlington Dam project which required postauthorization approval prior to construction. However, Congress has directed the Corps not to take further actions to construct the Burlington Dam until expressly directed to do so. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $57,100,000. Project was authorized by 1982 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 97-88 approved December 4, 1981. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984 and another local cooperation agreement will be prepared for the remainder of the Lake Darling project after a decision has been made on cost sharing for the entire project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning for the Lake Darling unit was continued at a cost of $1,228,353. Construction costs for improvements at Velva were $2,607,835. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration, at the Velva Unit cost $21,109, and $137,047, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning for the Lake Darling unit and construction on the Velva unit are in progress. 22. LAKE PULASKI, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Location. Lake Pulaski is approximately 45 miles northwest of the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. It lies within three local political jurisdictions (City of Buffalo, Wright County and Buffalo Township). Existing project. Lake Pulaski has no natural outlet. The lake has been rising over the past several years, inundating a number of houses or summer residences. Over 50 more structures are still vulnerable to flooding. A combination of a pumped pipeline and gravity-flow storm sewers to convey excess water through the city of Buffalo from Lake Pulaski to Buffalo Lake is to be constructed to stabilize the lake. Included in this project is a storm sewer upgrade which is to be constructed by the city of Buffalo. The lake will be maintained at elevation 966.0 feet mean sea level. This is the lowest level permitted for an artificial outlet under State of Minnesota rules governing landlocked lakes. The total cost of the project is currently estimated at $1,384,500, of which the Federal cost is $1,038,400. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in 27-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the Lake Pulaski Improvement District, the local sponsor, in August 1986. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all real estate interests necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; accomplish all alterations and relocations of buildings, utilities, highways and highway bridges necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide all costs in excess of the $4 million Federal cost limitation; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide during the period of construction an amount not less than 25 percent of the total project costs of which in no case shall the cash payment be less than 5 percent of the total project costs; comply with the applicable provisions of the "Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and study costs were $106,728. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for flood protection at Lake Pulaski was awarded September 1986. 23. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and the two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1289 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $277,289. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure are open to public travel. 24. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $94,800,000. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. Resolutions agreeing to provide formal assurances of local cooperation, when requested, were passed by the city council of North Mankato, Mankato, and South Bend Township (Le Hillier), respectively, on November 12, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the T.H. 60/Main Street bridge relocation continued and Stage 3C-1 construction was completed. Construction of the C&NW railroad bridge relocation and Stage 2B-HP work in Le Hillier was initiated. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $9,556,950, at North Mankato were $-514,390 and at Le Hillier were $120,684. Engineering and design by contract cost $287,619 and by hired labor cost $302,668. North Central Division Real Estate cost $228,532. Supervision and administration cost $261,138 by hired labor, $41,167 by contract, and$-2,019 by other Corps. Other miscellaneous costs were $-6,244. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the pumping stations, interior drainage facilities and the diversion channel are complete. The flood barriers are essentially complete except for a short segment of 27-10 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT flood'wall at the Main Street bridge (Stage 3C-2), and the Stage 2B-HP levee work underway. 25. MIDDLE RIVER AT ARGYLE, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Middle River within the city limits of Argyle, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection includes a system of levees, road raises along with interior drainage facilities to provide main developed parts of the City of Argyle with one percent chance flood protection. Also included is the evacuation of 12 residences which are located outside of the line of flood barrier protection. Total Federal cost of the project is estimated at $1,013,000 (March 1985 Detailed Project Report). The project was approved for construction on August 1, 1985, by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Argyle in August 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction improvements cost $807 by hired labor and $297,705 by contract. Engineering and design cost $119,352 by hired labor and $13,743 by contract. North Central Division real estate and Fish and Wildlife Service cost $1,640 and $760, respectively. Supervision and administration costs were $41,218. Contributions in lieu of cash were $-27,170. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction contract for Stage I was about 98 percent complete. Work on plans and specifications was completed. 26. MINNESOTA RIVER AT LE SUEUR, MN Location. In Le Sueur County in south central Minnesota on the Minnesota River about 60 miles southwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul. Existing project. Provides for erosion control along the right bank of the Minnesota River near downtown Le Sueur immediately downstream of the State Highway 93 bridge recently replaced by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Beginning at the downstream terminals of the zone of protection for the bridge, the project involves the excavation of all unstable channel bank material and the placement of rock-fill along an approximate 300 foot reach of eroding bank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Location cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. Local cooperation agreements were adopted by Le Sueur County in July 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $176,008. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $11,515. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract for the recommended work was awarded in August 1985. Construction was completed in June 1986. 27. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the desired reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation was accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in lowest portions of the floodplain. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the City of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978, and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs for property acquisition and relocation activities were $-90,834. A contract for site restoration cost $5,721. Engineering and design cost $1,791 by hired labor and supervision and administration cost $196. Contributions in lieu of cash were $ -4,661. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is complete. 28. RED LAKE RIVER MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $142,367. 27-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River initiated in February and the Clearwater River initiated in October 1948 were completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 29. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT ARGUSVILLE, ND Location. In Cass County in eastern North Dakota near the confluence of the Red River of the North and the Sheyenne River about 15 miles northwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project involves a levee encircling the City of Argusville with associated interior flood control facilities. The total levee system would be about 1.9 miles long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Interior flood control facilities consist of interceptor ditches and pipes, two temporary ponding areas and a pumping station to periodically discharge impounded water. Total Federal cost (1986) of the project is estimated at $1,600,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction July 5, 1985, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the City of Argusville, the local sponsor, in July 1985. Operations at end of fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $167,858. North Central Division real estate cost $1,081. Engineering and design cost $3,619 by contract and $36,410 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $24,870. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for Stage 1 involving the west levee was completed in July 1986. A construction contract for Stage 2 involving the remainder of the project was awarded in August 1986 and was 10 percent complete at the end of fiscal year 1986. 30. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See page 1278 of Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the City of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See page 1039 of Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the City of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued for the East Grand Forks project at a cost of $365,679. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $68,821 by hired labor, and $67,495 by contract. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $5,544. Data collection and maintenance of stream gaging cost $11,116 by hired labor, $1,975 by contract and $13,650 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water quality and control cost $26,312 by hired labor and $26,500 by U.S. Geological Survey. Supervision and administration, engineering and design and other miscellaneous costs were $39,948, $108,751 and $ - 2,233, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. Preconstruction planning is underway at East 27-12 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Grand Forks. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 27-I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Costs to date for operation and maintenance of Orwell Lake and Dam are $3,307,769. Total costs for active portion of project are $11,260,190. In addition, $350,034 was expended from contributed funds for work done for local interests. 31. RED RIVER AT THE NORTH AT HALSTAD, MN Location. In Norman County in western Minnesota on the Red River of the North about 36 miles north of Moorhead, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey Map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a system of levees and interior flood control facilities along the right bank of the Red River of the North. The total levee system is about 2.4 miles long and varies from 0 to over 20 feet high. Most of the levee is 5 to 12 feet high. The levee rings the city except for about 0.6 mile of high ground. Other features include 4 ponding areas and a system of gatewells, pipes and ditches to provide interior flood control. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction April 5, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Total Federal cost of the project was $2,012,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Halstad in April 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $17,457. Engineering and design cost $39,313 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $6,811. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the flood control project at Halstad is complete. An operation and maintenance manual was prepared and responsibility for the project was officially transferred to the city in August 1986. 32. REDWOOD RIVER AT MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the City of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The plan contained in June 1979 feasibility report provides for improvements upstream and downstream of the existing channel project at Marshall which is affected by limited channel capacity in both reaches. The upstream measures would include 1.9 miles of levee, 0.7 mile of channel improvement, an overflow structure, and 71 acres of floodway acquisition. The downstream improvements would consist of 1.5 miles of levee, 0.3 mile of channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. Recreation facilities would include multi-use trails and limited picnic facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 114 years. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $3,260,000 and $870,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 1150 of Annual Report for 1963 for requirements. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. By resolution approved April 2, 1979, the City of Marshall agreed to assume non-Federal responsibilities for the proposed project. By letter dated July 8, 1982, the City of Marshall indicated its willingness to financially participate in construction of a project consistent with the current administration's proposed upfront financial and cost sharing policies. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $133,624. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. Preconstruction planning for the new work is in progress. 33. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmstead County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 0.5 mile of grass-sloped channels, 6.1 miles of riprapped or gabionlined channels, 0.9 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, six drop structures, 2.4 miles of levee, and hiking and biking trails. Estimated cost (1986) to the United States for new work is $46,600,000 and $6,458,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required prior to the start of construction. By letter dated October 18, 1985, the city of Rochester indicated its intent to participate voluntarily in project financing as proposed in legislation being considered by Congress. 27-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $229,894. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is essentially complete. 34. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County and northeastern Kittson County, in northwestern Minnesota, and in south-central Manitoba, Canada. (For general location of the works in the United States see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Roseau River for flood control consisting of 44.4 miles of channel improvement, two sections of earth levees with lengths of 1.9 and 5.9 miles, respectively, 76 side ditch inlet transitions; remedial works along 16.6 miles of channel in Canada or an acceptable alternative therefor; one new bridge; and alteration of the existing dam in Roseau Village. Remedial works will be constructed in Canada at the expense of the United States. Estimated cost (1986) to the United States for new work is $23,400,000 including $6,690,000 for cost of work in Canada to be accomplished with United States funds and $6,600,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 282, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. Local interests have formed a Roseau River Watershed District to provide local cooperation requirements and acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning activities were continued relative to coordination of the project plan with Canadian interests. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost, $9,748. Condition at end of fiscal year: Planning is in progress and coordination with Canadian interests is underway. The general design memorandum was submitted in October 1971 and approved in March 1972. Design memorandum supplements which contain dimensions of environmental features added to the project were submitted in October 1975 and June 1980 and approved in November 1975 and July 1980, respectively. An EIS supplement was filed with the EPA in October 1981. 35. SHEYENNE RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, ND (Formerly Kindred Lake) Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the City of West Fargo. The authorized Kindred Lake project is in Richland County, ND, on the Sheyenne River, about 70 miles above its mouth and 5 miles above Kindred, ND. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife purposes to control the runoff from 3,014 square miles. The improvements would be coupled with a revised operating plan for the existing Baldhill Dam and with appropriate flood plain management measures at communities along the river. See Annual Report for 1973 for details. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 330, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Due to local concerns, a changed set of planning criteria, and potential changed conditions, a complete reformulation and reevaluation of alternatives was undertaken during preconstruction planning. The reevaluation studies showed that another alternative plan is more favorable than the authorized project. The General Reevaluation Report, completed in 1982, recommends implementation of a plan other than the authorized plan. The plan recommended in the General Reevaluation Report includes levees and diversions at West Fargo/Riverside, a flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo, and a five foot raise of the flood control pool at Baldhill Dam. Other actions are also identified that could be taken by non-Federal interests to enhance the degree of flood damage reduction provided by the overall plan. This new plan represents a significant change from the authorized project and recommends deauthorization of the Kindred Lake project and reauthorization of the new plan. The estimated Federal cost (1986) of the plan is $22,400,000 and $4,105,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of the project as authorized. On July 7, 1982, and May 20, 1983, the North Dakota State Water Commission furnished a letter of support for the recommended plan for flood control in the lower Sheyenne River Basin and also expressed its willingness to act as a non-Federal sponsor. On August 2, 1982, and July 30, 1982, respectively, the City of West Fargo and the Southeast Cass Water Resource District furnished letters of support and indicated their willingness to cooperate with the North Dakota State Water Commission. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District reiterated its support of the project by letter dated March 30, 1984. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested after completion of the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $733,305. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 36. SHEYENNE RIVER, VALLEY CITY, ND Location. In central Barnes County in southeastern North Dakota on the Sheyenne River within the city limits of Valley City, North Dakota. 27-14 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Existing project. The plan of protection includes placement of pervious fill, riprap, and suitable bedding material for emergency bank erosion protection along a 400 foot reach of the left bank of the Sheyenne River. The purpose of the project is to control the erosion and subsequent sloughing threatening College Street and utilities under the roadway. The project would provide a stable bank and protect both the road and utilities. Total Federal cost of the project is estimated at $111,000. The project was approved for construction on July 25, 1986, by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, utilities, highways and highway bridges, sewers and other facilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit of $250,000; maintain the project after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements and rights of way for construction and maintenance of the project, and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies and procedures in connection with said Act; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction, maintenance and operation of the project. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the City of Valley City in August 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completion of the Initial Appraisal Report and plans and specifications was accomplished at total cost for the year of $26,344 by hired labor. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in September 1986. 37. SOURIS RIVER, VELVA, ND Location. In McHenry County in north central North Dakota on the Souris River about 24 miles Southeast of Minot, North Dakota. Existing project. Provides for erosion control along the north bank of the Souris River at the sewage lagoons serving the City of Velva. The proposed protection plan involves the excavation of unstable river bank material in two reaches totalling about 600 feet long and the placement of a pervious sand and gravel fill and rip-rap. Total Federal cost (1986) of the project is estimated at $125,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in July 1986 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was adopted by the City of Velva in July 1986. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; accomplish all alterations and relocations of streets, highways, sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide all costs in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and administrative costs were $17,937. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract for the recommended work was awarded in September 1986. 38. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for local protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of Pammel Creek and includes 10,200 feet of concrete-lined rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, a terminus structure, and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the remaining 6,200 feet of channel is designed for subcritical flow. When completed, the project will provide Standard Project Flood (SPF) protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 400 feet of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF protection. Estimated cost (1986) to the United States for new work, exclusive of 27-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $24,800,000 and $4,162,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. All three groups reaffirmed their support by letter in July 1981. On October 4, 1982, the City of La Crosse furnished a letter in further support for the project and acknowledged that it would serve as the local sponsor. The City sent a letter of intent again on December 13, 1984, and furnished letter of assurance September 17, 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $20,953. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is substantially completed. Plans and specifications for the first stage of construction are complete. Ebner Coulee has been recommended for reclassification to "inactive" due to lack of economic feasibility. 39. TWIN VALLEY LAKE, WILD RICE RIVER, MN Location. In Norman County in west-central Minnesota, northeast of the City of Moorhead, on the Wild Rice River about 2 miles east of Twin Valley, MN. The Wild Rice River is a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project authorization provides for reservoir development on the Wild Rice River near Twin Valley, Minnesota, for flood damage reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The principal features include an 84 foot high, 7,700 foot long, earthen dam, a gated concrete spillway with concrete chute and stilling basin, a 10 foot diameter gated circular conduit for low flow outlet works, and recreation development on the created 540 acre reservoir. Storage capacity would provide 7,500 acre-feet for recreation and sedimentation and 44,700 acre-feet for flood control. The proposed works include development of three recreation areas along the margin of the lake for public use. The Federal Government would acquire about 3,500 acres of land necessary for carrying out the purposes of the project. Approximately 2,200 additional acres will be acquired to offset fish and wildlife habitat losses associated with project construction. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $19,300,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 366, 90th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. The Norman County Board of Commissioners, by resolutions dated November 7, 1974, September 19, 1978, and August 26, 1981, has declared its intention to provide local cooperation for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. By letters dated August 17, 1982, and August 31, 1984, the Wild Rice Watershed Board expressed their support and intent to provide local cooperation requirements and participate in innovative financing for flood control. The Norman County Board of Commissioners has also indicated the capability to provide assurances of local cooperation relating to flood control improvments. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $61,707. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. Project requires further authorization for mitigation lands. 40. WARNER ROAD MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ST. PAUL, MN Location. Left bank of Mississippi River, adjacent to Warner Road at about River mile 839, St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion which threatens Warner Road was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report, dated August 1984 recommended protection with 7,660 cubic yards of graded rock fill along about 350 feet of eroding river bank. The project was approved for construction by the Office Chief of Engineers on July 2, 1985. Total Federal cost of the project is $250,000. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was adopted by the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, in August 1985. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; accomplish all alterations and relocations of streets, highways, sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; hold and save the United States free from damages caused by the construction, operation and maintenance of the project except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide all costs in excess of the $250,000 Federal cost limitation; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of 27-16 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: A bank protection contract cost $159,000. Engineering and design and other study costs were $23,419. Condition at end of fiscal year. A contract for slope protection was awarded in December 1985. Project was substantially complete at end of fiscal year. 41. WILD RICE RIVER, MAHNOMEN COUNTY, MN Location. In Mahnomen County, in west central Minnesota on the Wild Rice River about 1.4 miles southwest of the City of Mahnomen. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion which threatens County-State Aid Highway (CSAH) #5 is authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report, dated September 1984, recommended protection with 320 cubic yards of gravel bedding and 660 cubic yards of riprap along about 450 feet of eroding riverbank. The project was approved for construction by the Office Chief of Engineers on June 18, 1985. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the County of Mahnomen, Minnesota, in August 1985. Local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance to the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all required alterations and relocations in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain the project after completion; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit of $250,000; provide a cash contribution for project costs in proportion to any special benefits to non-public property; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies and procedures in connection with said Act; comply with the Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with the construction and subsequent maintenance and operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $5,519.Engineering and design and other study costs were $9,762. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project was completed in October 1985 and is scheduled to be turned over to the local sponsor in November 1986. 42. WINONA, MN Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of the Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for completed upstream improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17, 316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the area bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River backup flows from entering Lake Winona and inundating the area now only partially protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the existing levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averaging 10 feet in height total approximately 3.1 miles in length. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 feet in height, total about 2,025 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $30,429,000 and $572,000 was contributed by local interests. Resolutions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on July 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. For improvements authorized in 1971 see Annual Report of 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the City of Winona on October 6, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts for Reaches B, C, and E cost $8,454, $6,939 and $14,206, respectively. Miscellaneous minor construction contracts cost $31,163. Engineering and design cost $21,209 by contract and $55,591 by hired labor. Real estate management by NCD cost $5,827. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $42,748. 27-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Condition at end of fiscal year: The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. Work authorized in 1971 is substantially complete. Project was formally dedicated by the city on October 13, 1985. 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted (See table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $43,419. Total cost to September 30, 1986, is $809,429. Miscellaneous 44. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) coordination with the state of Minnesota cost $5,521, and the state of Wisconsin, $22,795. Other Corps of Engineer Wisconsin related costs were $5,846. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $3,719. General Investigations 45. SURVEYS Flood control studies continued at a cost of $1,546,751. Coordination studies with other agencies and miscellaneous activities cost $358,257. Review for deauthorization, Tongue River cost $4,107. Total cost of surveys for the period was $1,909,115. 46. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs during the period were $42,327 for International Water Studies and $179,416 for Flood Plain Management Services. Costs were $49,956 for stream flow data obtained by Corps gaging beyond cooperative stream-gaging program, and for hydraulic laboratory work in measurement and analysis of sediment load in streams. Costs were $96 for inspection of dams in conjunction with the national program of inspection of non-Federal dams. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $271,795. 47. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Cost during the period was $133,624 for Redwood River at Marshall, MN. For detail of the individual project see section 32 in text. 48. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $1,463,603 for advance engineering and design projects. For details of individual projects see sections 10, 30, 33, 35, 38, and 39 in text. 27-18 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. St. Croix River MN and WI 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN 6. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN 7. Bassett Creek, MN 8. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 9. Black Bear and Miller Lakes, MN 10. Chaska, MN 11. Devils Lake, ND 12. Eau Galle River, WI 13. Enderlin, Maple River, ND 14. Hanover, Hennepin County, MN ~ Total Cost to September 30 Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 1986 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 44,000 439,098 1,361,800 1,485,496 59,000 6,605 1,785,000 1,673,967 420,000 419,039 1,600,588 1,544,335 -97,000 -7,956 44,000 199,906 60,000 79,090 435,000 416,333 575,000 473,040 208,000 800,572 225,000 242,018 275,000 159,656 263,000 261,079 910,000 386,927 17,000 30,503 75,000 52,669 25,000 41,949 1,450,000 904,550 128,000 147,247 50,000 32,045 373,000 364,914 1,767,000 570,621 331,000 275,094 2,600,000 861,589 24,000 22,720 34,000 25,752 15,000 14,668 205,000 800,088 302,000 227,418 147,000 59,680 346,000 316,949 213,000 1,413,067 575,000 502,985 -72,000 1,898,355 -48,300 7,585 2,263,000 2,040,208 100 100 34,6004 38,9474 331,000 87,146 415,000 323,387 130,000 221,445 107,000 173,867 274,000 244,984 15,000 52,066 90,124 606,000 472,034 361,669 44,500 23,960 $ 2,057,7221 $ 2,057,7221 2,277,886 2,277,886 4,398,6282 4,398,6282 23,821,6463 23,438,8953 425,000 425,000 150,410 150,410 1,108,355 1,108,355 86,105 86,105 1,121,000 1,119,775 630,000 328,237 2,130,000 2,020,970 12,175,000 12,069,9545 2,111,200 2,098,110 471,000 336,709 1,843,000 1,841,149 2,470,000 2,424,147 9,039,250 9,039,250 4,902,105 4,247,869 4,000,0006 3,942,2246 44,500 23,960 27-19 - 161,000 7,385 161,546 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 27-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project 15. Homme Lake and Dam, ND 16. Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI 17. Kickapoo River Gay Mills, WI 18. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 19. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 20. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 21. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND 22. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN 23. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 24. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 25. Middle River at Argyle, MN 26. Minnesota River at Le Sueur, MN 27. Prairie du Chien, WI 28. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN 29. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 97,000 57,991 184,000 168,297 550,000 336,849 22,000 17,656 16,268 845,000 788,978 1,150,000 1,176,694 102,000 83,000 108,738 99,956 - 158,500 - 14,290 263,000 312,230 175,614 21,000 25,439 180 881,200 898,714 1,100,000 1,113,594 7,500 7,500 1,139,000 517,273 38,372 42,000 27,484 1,241,000 955,731 3,000,000 1,641,509 75,000 68,764 190,000 179,000 203,000 186,053 210,966 187,906 5,950,000 7,645,000 9,176,000 5,169,491 7,835,568 8,928,093 60,000 40,000 215,000 46,394 52,937 98,985 - - 250,000 - - 62,477 161,000 -140,000 -125,000 29,549 -171,891 103,876 54,000 34,383 60,000 55,178 26,000 52,072 45,000 44,994 123,000 72,031 259,000 108,758 68,000 83,257 144,210 33,000 22,645 384,500 931,793 78,000 68,208 934,000 1,082,717 3,434,000 3,994,344 325,000 106,728 265,000 277,289 10,875,000 10,276,105 345,000 448,055 187,523 -70,000 -87,787 100,500 142,367 535,000 233,838 27-20 FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 1986 1,396,0977 1,396,0977 2,203,421 2,201,449 158,500 158,500 33,000 22,645 964,873 964,873 4,994,663 4,909,368 18,642,000 18,642,000 181,000 154,651 3,325,6388 3,325,6386 12,908,152 12,654,131 9,484,000 8,586,517 407,500 182,992 1,339,727 1,339,727 3,112,619 3,095,960 76,845,500 75,241,937 725,000 708,051 250,0009 250,0009 3,685,000 3,543,813 3,120,07910 3,120,07910 941,302 930,311 1,014,000 557,226 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 1986 30. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN SD and ND 31. Red River of the North at Halstad, MN 32. Redwood River at Marshall, MN 33. Rochester, MN 34. Roseau River, MN 35. Sheyenne River, ND (formerly Kindred Lake) 36. Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND 37. Souris River, Velva, ND 38. State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI 39. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN 40. Warner Road, Mississippi River St. Paul, MN 41. Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN 42. Winona, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 175,000 255,000 174,255 250,178 152,000 200,000 152,388 183,822 296,000 1,273,000 156,373 890,478 - 150,000 - 149,998 316,000 100,000 259,351 149,589 - 250,000 114,116 53,911 - 165,000 34,565 152,862 275,000 241,385 481,000 445,057 200,500 690,372 235,000 118,804 400,000 402,047 331,000 365,679 385,000 367,879 22,500 63,581 75,000 133,624 244,000 229,894 19,271 9,748 265,000 711,000 245,105 733,305 - 39,000 - 26,344 202,000 350,000 315,000 178,742 344,756 323,466 - 30,000 20,000 - 1,680 45,983 15,400 - 25,000 8,173 7,027 23,049 - - 58,500 - - 43,219 6,850,000 2,210,000 2,772,000 6,470,128 2,354,380 2,770,665 42,500 17,937 15,000 20,953 82,000 61,707 209,600 182,419 7,959,98411 7,952,42111 3,384,534 3,307,769 2,012,000 2,012,000 2,262,86612 2,205,29212 3,124,000 3,082,838 2,128,000 1,910,338 3,416,000 3,404,852 39,000 26,344 42,500 17,937 1,787,000 1,772,866 2,043,700 2,021,070 250,000 220,668 - 58,500 15,281 58,500 - 32,576,131 186,137 32,496,98513 'Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 4Includes $25,000 appropriated and $29,347 expended in FY 1986 for condition surveys. 5Excludes $152,223 contributed funds. In addition, $420,464 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 6Excludes $93,099 contributed funds. 7Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. sExcludes $208,000 contributed funds. 9Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 10Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. "Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit, $11,239, which is classed as "inactive" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 12Includes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. 13Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 27-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sec. Date of in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 1. July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a Annual Report 1891. channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. p. 2209 July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess.' RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN 3. Mar. 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Mar. 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project 2d sess. abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., Gull Lake. 1st sess. 1 June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN AND WI 4. June 18, 1878 Dredging, etc., for a 3-foot channel between mouth and H. Ex. Doc. 75, pt. 6, 43rd Taylors Falls. Cong., 2d Sess;4 Annual Report 1875, p. 372. June 3, 1896 Harbor and waterfront at Stillwater. Jan. 21, 1927 A 6-foot channel to Stillwater. H. Doc. 378, 69th Cong., 1st sess.4 Aug. 30, 1935 The 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater. H. Doc. 184, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 4 May 17, 1950 Small-boat harbor at Hudson. H. Doc. 184, 81st Cong., 1st sess.4 WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Specified in Act. June 6, 1900 Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess.5 June 13, 19023 Mar. 3, 1905 Enlarging turning basin H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess.5 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Deepening to 8 feet. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3 Appropriation. 4See H. Doc. 462, 71st Congress, 2d sess., for latest published map. 5Latest published map is opposite p. 1984 in Annual Report for 1911. 27-22 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3,4 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN 5 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 Wisconsin River, WI 2,3 1888 - Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive5 1928 27,941 11,139 1Existing channel adequate for commerce (see table 27-G for deauthorized portion of project). 2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, E3th Cong., 1st sess.). 6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.). 27-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND5 Completed 1985 58,500 - Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Deferred 1983 5,568,5001 - Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 1,790,7592 - Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,7003 - Grafton, ND Active4 1983 - - Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915 - Irving Township, Jackson County, WI5 Completed 1984 189,600 - LaCrosse, WI Active6 1983 - - Lost River, MN Completed 1967 517,519 - Lower Branch Rush River, ND8 Completed 1974 1,000,0009 - Minneota, MN8 Completed 1963 161,545 - Minot, ND Completed 1983 21,479,50010 - Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835 - Pembina River, ND Active4 1983 - - Pembina River Lake, ND Inactive" 1950 50,000 - Red Lake River at Huot, MN5 Completed 1984 64,500 - Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN5 Completed 1984 131,000 - Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN5 Completed - 27,500 - Red River of the North at Oslo, MN8 Completed 1984 1,960,200 - Red River of the North at Pembina, ND8 Completed 1979 2,000,000 - Redwood River below Marshall, MN8 Completed 1960 202,400 - Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 - Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN Completed 1985 250,00012 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01213 - Tongue River Lake, ND Inactive" 1950 23,695 - Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 - Velva, ND8 Completed 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, MN8 Completed 1980 999,900 - Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 182,000 - Hastings, MN5 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, MN Inactive 14 1974 182,000 - Wild Rice River-South Branch and Felton Completed 1985 4,534,700 - Ditch, MN Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - 1Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 2Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 3In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 4Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 5Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 6 Preconstruction planning has not started. 7Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see table 27-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. sProject authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 9Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 1�Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 1'Further work deferred pending review of project document (inactive). 12Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 13Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 14 Preconstruction planning suspended. Local interests requested the project be reclassified to inactive due to a limitation of their funding capability. The project was classified inactive on April 5, 1974. 27-24 TABLE 27-G ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI 1 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Maple River, ND2 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 $1,241 - Moorhead, MN2 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 - Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND2 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 - Warroad Harbor and River, MN3 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - 1Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see table 27-C for costs for completed portion of project). 2Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 27 in text and table 27-J for costs for active units of the project). 3 Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see table 27-A for costs for completed portion of project). 27-25 TABLE 27-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Corn- Com- Total Reservoir (feet)' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) pleted Cost pleted Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173 250.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 22,370,841 22,471,698 Permanent indefinite appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 - - - - 967,197 967,197 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $27,479,861 $28,262,523 1Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. LTj C y O ITj 0c tTj 0 tTj z z Cw I) x i) 00 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 30 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit State Type September 30, 1986 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,000 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, pumping plants 1,511,637 22,000,000 Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, levees 1,639,924 1,639,9002 Total cost to date 7,874,2853 Total estimated cost 28,362,0004 'Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities, revised in 1955, was estimated to be $996,000. The Flood Control Act 2Includes $67,900 for lands. approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion 3Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge inactive unit of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperatotal $66,897. tion. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates 4The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as indicated in table 27-G. 'inactive' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 43 of Text) Project Date Inspected Arcadia, WI.................................. .......................... September 1986 Black River (North Bend), WI ............................................ September 1986 Breckenridge, MN......................................................... September 1986 Cochrane, WI ........................................................... September 1986 Fargo, ND ......................... ....................... August 1986 Grand Forks, ND ......................................................... August 1986 Huot, MN............................. .................................. August 1986 Irving Township, WI ...................................................... September 1986 Mahnomen, MN .......................................................... August 1986 Minot, ND ............................ ................................. September 1986 Oslo, M N ................................................... ............ August 1986 Pembina, ND......................... .......................... ....... August 1986 Red Lake Falls, MN ....................................................... August 1986 St. Paul, M N ............................................... ............. August 1986 Velva, ND .................................... ......................... September 1986 27-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 27-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Afton, MN ..................... .............................................. Beaver Lake, Stearns County, MN ............................................... Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN ................................................... English Coulee, Grand Forks, ND ............................................... Fridley, MN .................................................................. Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN ............ ........................................ Jordan, MN ................................................................. Lake Carnelian, Stearns County, MN............................................. Lake Charlotte, MN ............................................................. Minnesota River, Henderson, MN. .................................................. Mississippi River, Cochrane, WI ........................................ .......... Neche, ND .................................................................. Root River, Hokah, MN ................................................... Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI ..................................................... Snake River, Alvarado, MN........ ............................................. Trempealeau River, Arcadia, WI .................................................. Trempealeau River, Blair, WI ...................................................... Wild Rice River, Ada, MN ...................................... ................... $7,500 7,500 6,351 66,777 51,778 128,790 40,564 7,500 16,488 4,568 7,500 26,768 646 58,123 65,941 102,617 7,500 37,324 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Lac qui Parle River, MN $7,500 Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Chippewa River, Big Bend-Hagen, WI $7,500 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project Fiscal Year Costs Disaster preparedness $251,400 Rehabilitation 94,407 Total emergency flood control activities 345,807 27-28 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL ........... 28-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN .............. 28-2 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL .... 28-3 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ..................... 28-3 5. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI . 28-3 6. Other. Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 28-3 Flood Control 7. Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA .. 28-3 8. Bettendorf, IA ........................... 28-4 9. Coralville Lake, IA ....................... 28-4 10. Davenport, IA ........................... 28-4 10. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA ........................... 28-4 12. Farm Creek, IL ......................... 28-5 13. Milan, IL ............................... 28-5 14. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA ...... 28-5 15. Rockford, IL ............................ 28-5 16. Saylorville Lake, IA ...................... 28-5 17. W aterloo, IA ............................ 28-6 18. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 28-6 19. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..... 28-6 20. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................... 28-6 General Investigations Page 21. Surveys ................................. 28-6 22. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 28-6 23. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ... 28-6 24. Advance Engineering and Design ........... 28-7 Tables Table 28-A Cost and Financial Statement ....... 28-8 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 28-10 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ 28-13 Table 28-D Not Applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 28-14 Table 28-F Not Applicable Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 28-16 Table 28-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................. 28-16 Table 28-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 28-18 Table 28-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams ................. 28-20 Table 28-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost .... 28-20 Table 28-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost ........ 28-21 Table 28-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project ........................ 28-22 Table 28-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project .................. 28-22 28-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1982, a judgment of the Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, directed that a fund of $2,812,658 plus interest at 12 percent per annum computed from February 23, 1979, be established by the United States in the District Court from which payments are to be made to plaintiffs for required repairs to Illinois and Mississippi Canal bridges. Actual payment for the judgment award was $3,722,572, which included interest at 12 percent through November 4, 1981. Engineering and design work in connection with this matter cost $359,615 during FY 1986. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles); Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, IL, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near-entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 28-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work is $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, placed in the inactive category in June 1973, cost of $132,000,000 (July 1972) Federal and $16,300,000 (July 1972) non-Federal; Calumet- Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non-Federal; widen Pekin Bend, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the inactive category, cost of $1,360,700 (July 1972) Federal; and widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1972) Federal, are all excluded from present cost estimate. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. (See also tables 28-J through 28-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project, and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by the Dredge DUBUQUE was performed at various locations in LaGrange pool at a cost of $613,700 with a total of 115,534 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and approval were completed at a cost of $42,300. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $504,500. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility cost $6,300, and contractor earned $116,700 on a construction mitigation contract at this facility. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,640,300. Bank stabilization of the Chicago and ship canal was performed by hired labor at a cost of $38,300. Contractor earned $100,000 for replacing valve operating machinery at O'Brien Lock. Contractor earned $24,700 for modification of miter gate machinery at Marseilles Lock. Contractor earned $126,000 for construction of a combined maintenance building and central control station at Marseilles Lock and Dam. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at the locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $9,600. Permanent operating equipment costs were $35,100. Engineering and design work, including preparation of design memorandums cost $352,900, and supervision and administration for the maintenance features totaled $92,500. Total maintenance costs were $3,702,900. Net credits to the project were $11,700, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $5,118,400. Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $431,900. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $62,300. Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $200,600 with contract law en- 28-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT forcement provided at a cost of $3,700. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $401,100; natural resource activities cost $20,600; and water control management costs were $656,200; and the amount of $4,700 was expended on Master Plans. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $210,600. Total operation costs were $7,110,100. Total operation and maintenance costs were $10,797,875 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at La Grange, Peoria, Marseilles, Brandon Road, Starved Rock, and Lockport Lock Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at La Grange were $782,873; at Brandon Road, $4,720,696; at Starved Rock, $14,559; at Lockport, $7,244,703; and at Marseilles, $3,203,246; and at Peoria, $562,557; for a total of $16,528,634. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $116,256; water control management $65,375; and supervision and administration $31,147. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $317,984 for dredging and $13,495 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool was $567,785. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $10,797,875; Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $567,785; for a total operation and maintenance cost of $11,369,085. 3. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Location. Mill Creek and South Slough are small streams, tributary to the Rock River, at Milan, Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. The existing project provided for flood protection at the village of Milan necessitated by the construction of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal. The project consisted of diversion of Mill Creek into South Slough, floodgates in the walls of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal to carry Mill Creek flood waters across the canal right-ofway into Rock River, levees, and other works for flood protection. The project was constructed in 1931-1932. In 1962-1963, $73,366 was expended from Illinois and Mississippi Canal maintenance funds for restoration of the Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Minor channel maintenance was performed at a cost of $270. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is located in the Mississippi River Basin encompassing a 5-State area including IL, IA, MN, MO, and WI. Existing project. The project represents the initial implementation of the master plan prepared by the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association (report dated January 1982). Project features include long-term resources monitoring, habitat rehabilitation and enhancement, recreation improvement and studies, traffic monitoring, and computerized inventory and analysis. The project will be initiated in FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. The execution of the project will be closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, other Federal agencies, affected States, and local communities. See Table 28-B for authorization legislation. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements will be sought as required. Operations during fiscal year. Costs during the year totaled $442,751. Funds were used to initiate engineering and design on ten habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects and four recreation projects. Construction was initiated on one habitat project. Funds were also used to work on the long term resources monitoring program, recreation economics studies, traffic monitoring program, and the general plan. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-C. Flood Control 7. AMES DAM AND RESERVOIR, SKUNK RIVER, IA Location. The Ames Lake project is located on the Skunk River in Story County, IA, about 5 miles upstream from the city of Ames, IA. Existing project. Major project features would include a dam constructed of compacted impervious earth with gated outlet works and spillway; a subimpoundment forming a 30-acre lake by blocking a ravine with embankment for access road crossing the dam; relocations consisting of roads, telephone and power lines; and remedial protection for Story City by levee and street raises. The conservation pool would have a surface area of 2,100 acres and the full flood control pool would have a surface area of 5,000 acres. The project was authorized to store water for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Current study efforts concluded that a smaller scaled down project was the only feasible alternative. The scaled down project would have a surface area of 1,850 acres and the full flood control pool would have a surface area of 3,620 acres. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. By letter dated October 26, 1973, the Governor of IA advised "There is general agreement 28-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 that the project provides definite flood control benefits to the downstream landowner. However, the costs associated with it and the values to be foregone as a result of the project outweigh the benefits. Therefore, at this time, the State's position must be that of general opposition to the project." Due to the State's position in regard to the project, it was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category on June 20, 1974. Recently, there has been renewed congressional and local interest in this project. By letter dated March 6, 1984, the city of Ames, IA, provided a copy of a resolution that the City Council adopted February 28, 1984, requesting reactivitation of the project. The project was approved for reactivation on July 2, 1984. By letters dated August 27, 1986 and September 9, 1986, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and City of Ames, Iowa advised that they did not support the scaled down project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was continued on a General Reevaluation Report (GRR). Costs totaled $172,865. 8. BETTENDORF, IA Location. The city of Bettendorf is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local flood protection from the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of 3 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps. Construction was started in July 1982. Estimated project cost is $15,906,000 including $1,510,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table-28B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued. The project is 94 percent completed. Costs were $3,853,355. 9. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,494 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge, which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation performed at a cost of $507,889. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,045,865. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees: $70,000. 10. DAVENPORT, IA Location. The city of Davenport is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 482.4 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local protection to the city from floods on the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees, floodwall, interior drainage facilities and pump plants, closure structures, and recreational facilities. The project also provides for the enhancement and preservation of Nahant Marsh at the downstream edge of the city as a wetland area with important contribution to environmental quality. Estimated project cost is $40,900,000 including $11,700,000 non-federal costs. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. The city has withdrawn support for the project because of high costs and public opposition. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 11. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20 at Fort Dodge, IA. It includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) the operation and maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development and other activities as will enhance the natural environment for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project, the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to carry out such project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee will be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of eight counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. There is strong local support for the project by recreational and environmental interests. These interests were instrumental in developing and supporting the authorization for the project. However, since cost-sharing requirements have not been developed for elements of 28-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT the project or coordinated with respective sponsors, it is unknown how many of the potential 20 or more sponsors are willing or able to participate in the project under terms and conditions acceptable to the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. A plan for engineering and design was completed and General Design memorandum studies were initiated. Costs incurred were $163,997. 12. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $79,810. 13. MILAN, IL Location. The village of Milan is located on the south bank of the Rock River several miles upstream from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 479.1 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection against direct flooding from Rock River and Mill Creek and against backwater flooding from the Mississippi River to be provided the community by construction of levees, floodwalls, closure structure, bridges, pumping stations, drainage facilities, and street ramps. Construction was initiated in March 1981. The estimated project cost is $17,940,000, including $3,440,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project continued at a cost of $566,240. The principal work items were levee construction and utilities relocations. The project is about 92 percent completed. 14. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 47,611 acres in fee and 29,057 acres in flowage easement. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $2,638,830. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $70,000. 15. ROCKFORD, IL Location. The city of Rockford is located along both banks of the Rock River, in Winnebago County, IL. Kent Creek is a small stream, tributary to the Rock River, which flows through the right-bank portion of the city. Existing project. The project provides flood protection for the right-bank portion of the city from floods on Kent Creek. It consists of a rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek; raise of Levings Lake Dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Construction was initiated in October 1978. The estimated project cost is $16,610,000, including $6,440,000 for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $564,537. The principal work items were channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek and construction of the diversion channel on South Branch Kent Creek. The project is about 86 percent completed. 16. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an escavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modi- 28-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 fication includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of a diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 26,526 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements for 1,925 acres. The estimated project cost is $128,216,000, including $2,770,000 non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the construction of recreational facilities and improvements to Highway 415, and on engineering and design work for the downstream floodway corridor. New work costs were $3,631,688. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $3,032,005. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $70,000. The project is about 85 percent completed. 17. WATERLOO, IA Location. The city of Waterloo is located along both banks of the Cedar River in Black Hawk County, IA. Existing project. The project provides local protection to the city of Waterloo from floods on the Cedar River, Black Hawk Creek, Virden Creek, and Blowers Creek. It consists of 15.4 miles of earth levee, 2 miles of floodwall, 11,330 feet of channel improvement, an impounding dam on Virden Creek, and interior drainage facilities including 8 pumping plants. Extensive urban renewal, undertaken by the city, has been coordinated with the flood control project. Construction was initiated in August 1972. The estimated project cost is $63,760,100, including $15,000,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $42,652. The principal work items were continuation of construction of levees and floodwalls along the Cedar River. The project is 100 percent completed. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $165,784. (See Table 28-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 28-I. Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 28-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 28-I. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Flood control studies in progress included the Mississippi River, Coon Rapids to Ohio River; the Illinois River from Henry to Naples, IL; Quincy Bay, IL; and the Vermilion River Basin, IL. Total cost of flood control studies was $414,611. Special investigations, FERC review, SCS coordination, and planning assistance to States efforts totaled $40,574. Total cost of surveys was $505,185. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $183,851. Hydrologic studies, including general studies, sedimentation studies, streamflow studies, and rainfall studies cost $2,644. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $186,495. 23. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING The Loves Park, IL, project, part of an authorized study of the Rock River in the vicinity of Rockford, IL, lies in Winnebago County, IL, on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, 17 miles south of the IL-WI State line. The project would provide local flood protection (100-year level) for the city of Loves Park, IL, against flooding of Loves Park Creek (formerly called the Large Unnamed Creek). Protection measures would consist of 17,350 feet of channel improvements, a 75,000 GPM pump plant, and ponding. Congress has appropriated funds for preconstruction planning and engineering studies at Loves Park. A General Reevaluation Study was initiated on October 17, 1984. FY 1986 cost for continuation of work on the General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was $303,507. The South Quincy, IL, project is located in the South Quincy Drainage and Levee District in Adams County, IL. The existing project protects 5,800 acres of agricultural, 28-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT commercial, industrial, and residential lands from floods up to a 50-year chance of occurrence. The proposed plan would raise the level of protection to a 500-year chance of occurrence. The levee is about 8.8 miles long and starts in the vicinity of Curtis Creek and Highway 57 on the north, runs along the south bank of Curtis Creek, along the east bank of the Mississippi River, and along the north bank of Mill Creek, and ends in the area of Mill Creek and Highway 57. Fiscal 1986 work on the project was the completion of a General Design Memorandum (GDM) at a cost of $218,160. Total cost for continuation of planning and engineering was $521,666. 24. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN The Hannibal, MO, project area is on the right bank of the Mississippi River at the city of Hannibal, MO, 309 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River. The project would provide flood protection to the business and industrial area of the city of Hannibal by the construction of a system of levees and floodwalls. The plan also included a pumping plant, closure structures for railroads and streets, alteration of the existing sewage system, and a tainter gate closure at the mouth of Bear Creek. Advance planning on the project was begun in 1962; however, in 1965 further work was discontinued because of lack of local support. Local interest revived in 1979, and the project was reclassified from "inactive" to the "active" category. A study has been undertaken to reformulate the project to meet existing needs of the project area and to reflect current Federal and State criteria for water resources projects. No action toward fulfillment of local cooperation requirements has been taken. Detailed studies for reformulation of the project and evaluation of alternatives were continued at a cost of $117,693. The Moline, IL, project is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Local protection at Moline from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 4 miles of earth levee and floodwall, closure structures, aesthetic and recreational development, and interior drainage facilities consisting of gravity outlets, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. Construction has not yet been initiated due to gaps in Federal funding. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $12,715. Total cost for advance engineering and design was $130,408. 28-7 TABLE 28-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 September 1986 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL 5. Upper Mississippi River Environmenta Management Progra IL, IA, MN, MO, W 7. Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 8. Bettendorf, IA 9. Coralville Lake, IA 10. Davenport, IA 11. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 12. Farm Creek, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: l Approp. im, Cost TI New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,100,000 2,423 10,402,185 11,471,710 1,735,000 5,681,952 1,000 1,500 800,000 57,049 13,673,299 13,738,078 17,025,000 18,248,288 35,000 24,184 - - 7,605,1431 - - 7,605,1431 99,000 695,000 17,890,8102 330,888 359,615 17,544,1882 10,476,000 10,655,009 15,270,000 10,389,719 10,000 11,895 - 126,707,7513 - 126,706,4193 10,847,351 225,748,7474 10,797,875 222,312,8814 13,841,000 75,550,625 16,528,634 72,855,889 2,000 270 30,000 814,000 - 442,750 63,7196 63,7196 396,553 387,144 844,000 442,750 250,000 144,000 2,185,800 194,053 172,865 2,158,718 2,440,000 3,315,000 2,800,000 1,859,754 3,701,200 2,952,322 - - 289,121 3,491,700 199,040 2,715,000 2,420,201 200,000 100,458 1,965,000 2,086,884 2,101,000 2,329,008 95,717 2,037,000 3,656,994 2,453,500 2,524,087 2,240 3,741,000 13,622,980 3,853,355 13,587,539 270,052 507,889 2,290,600 2,045,866 15,000 238,000 - 163,997 107,000 109,008 142,000 70,314 52,000 98,920 289,121 270,052 29,969,488 29,578,309 23,411,105 20,997,317 1,689,717 1,687,833 178,997 - 9,859,020 - 9,859,020 60,000 2,685,232 79,811 2,578,125 28-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 September 1986 13. Milan, IL 14. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 15. Rockford, IL 16. Saylorville Lake, IA 22. Loves Park, IL South Quincy, IL 23. Hannibal, MO Moline, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 3,400,000 3,522,286 12,000 50,000 489,056 2,968,500 2,927,214 400,000 866,122 -84,262 40,448 1,960,000 491,088 3,953,837 2,703,132 1,532,500 395,229 3,530,000 2,875,000 962,000 13,686,640 3,263,505 2,464,332 566,240 12,186,235 213,950 - - 201,554 225,950 201,554 - - - 95,303,484 - - - 95,302,484 2,712,000 3,018,300 3,004,600 24,847,323 2,518,900 3,263,730 2,638,830 22,018,810 475,000 1,309,129 104,200 117,606 2,500,000 1,590,361 3,173,000 4,451,959 221,989 820,558 1,100,000 309,000 8,968,273 883,485 564,537 8,145,286 391 - 249,361 981 48 244,208 5,313,000 6,404,697 2,681,500 2,724,425 408,352 593,869 7,107,000 3,631,688 3,116,600 3,032,005 141,989 141,745 200,000 311,000 187,644 303,507 150,000 209,000 138,466 218,160 150,000 150,000 153,304 134,787 281,000 172,217 106,759 60,000 80,692 90,000 48,410 124,000 117,693 -25,000 12,715 109,826,887 104,692,066 22,362,043 19,162,810 2,304,830 1,951,401 511,000 491,151 359,000 356,626 644,993 638,626 1,415,000 1,407,615 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 5. Includes $85 for previous project. 6. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 7. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 28-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 28-10 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 3. July 3, 1930 August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Channel diversion, floodgates, and other work for flood protection. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 28-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 (P.L. 89-298) August 13, 1968 9. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 10. December 31, 1970 11. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) 12. 1944 Flood Control Act 13. August 13, 1968 14. June 28, 1938 15. October 23, 1962 16. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 17. October 27, 1965 AMES DAM AND RESERVOIR, SKUNK RIVER, IA Reservoir for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BETTENDORF, IA Levees, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps for flood control. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DAVENPORT, IA Levee, floodwall, and pumping plants. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. MILAN, IL Levee closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. ROCKFORD, IL Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and appurtenant works for flood control. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. WATERLOO, IA Levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure structures for flood control. 8. 28-12 H. Doc. 267, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 348, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc., 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 166, 89th Cong., 1st sess. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HANNIBAL, MO 24. October 23, 1962 Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and pumping H. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., plant for flood control. 2nd sess. MOLINE, IL October 27, 1965 Levee, closure structures, and interior drainage H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., (Section 201) facilities for flood control, and aesthetic and 1st sess. Approved by recreational development. Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate, June 14, 1972, and June 21, 1972, respectively. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration Program 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. Rivers. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag portion. TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,9791 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,4993 0 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 28-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 1943 274,822 - - Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 1962 1,679,056 - - Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 144,910 - - Canton, MO' 1964 1,496,555 - - Clinton, IA 1981 26,001,996 - 761,050 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,923,145 - - Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 68,898 - - Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 1969 1,492,016 - - Des Moines, IA 1972 4,993,224 - 23,323 Drury Drainage District, IL 1964 1,144,875 - - Dubuque, IA 1974 10,861,170 - 145,415 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 207,826 - - East Moline, IL 1984 9,683,300 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL1 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL1 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA1 1983 1,129,800 - - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN 1957 72,432 - - 28-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 18 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 -- Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - - Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - - South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 - - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 - - Authorized Projects Not Constructed Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL - - - - Freeport, IL 1979 286,000 - - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - - Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 - - South Beloit, IL 1979 270,000 - - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 28-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $ 76,664 - Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 - Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 - - Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 - Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks 1982 1981 - - Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 - - Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 - - William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - TABLE 28-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 17 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL October 1985 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 October 1985 January 1986 January 1986 October 1985 February 1986 January 1986 October 1985 October 1985 November 1985 October 1985 November 1985 October 1985 September 1985 April 1986 January 1986 January 1986 September 1985 28-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-H (Continued) Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 17 of Text) Date Inspected Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District, No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, ILl Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1, and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN October 1985 November 1985 January 1986 October 1985 October 1985 November 1985 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 October 1985 December 1985 December 1985 December 1985 November 1985 January 1986 October 1985 April 1986 January 1986 January 1984 April 1986 October 1985 November 1985 October 1985 January 1986 January 1986 October 1985 November 1985 September 1985 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 December 1985 January 1986 December 1985 October 1985 January 1986 January 1986 January 1986 September 1985 April 1986 December 1985 October 1985 1. Project partially completed. 28-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 19 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Cedar River, Waverly, IA Couler Valley, Dubuque County, IA Decatur, IL DeKalb, IL Illinois River, Liverpool, IL Iroquois River, Sugar Creek, Watseka, IL Lake Creek, Rockwell City, IA Morton, IL North River, Marion County, MO Oelwein, Fayette County, IA Ottawa, IL Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL Plainfield, IA Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Tama, IA Vermilion River, Pontiac, IL $28,310 1,787 19,585 34 27,481 45,761 2,500 27,917 18,010 30,311 33,682 3,048 34,855 17,205 12,778 67,196 TABLE 28-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Des Moines River, East Branch, Kossuth County, IA $ 3,481 Negro Creek, Bureau County, IL 5,858 TABLE 28-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 320 St. N. Rock River, Rock Island, IL $ 10,961 Des Moines River, Boone, IA 79 Des Moines River, Eldon, IA 34 Middle River, Adair County, IA 6,291 Mississippi River, Cassville, WI 7,500 North Fabius River, Lewis County, MO 144 North River, Marion County Road 152, MO 143,771 Turkey River, Elgin, IA 107,426 Turkey River, Jefferson Township, IA 9,919 Turkey River, Millville Township, IA 9,316 28-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-I (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and (See Section 19 of Text) AUTHORIZATION Flood Fighting, and Antecedent Legislation) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation Rehabilitation: Banner Levee, Fulton County, IL Below London Mills-Parker, IL Blackburn Levee, IL Blout-Lundry Levee, IL Cullinane-Zempel-Evans, IL Dobey Levee, IL Formhals Levee, IL Globe, IL Hager Slough, IL Hennepin Levee, Illinois River, IL Herman, IL Irvin-Blackburn Levee, IL LL WM & KV Drainage and Levee, IL Louisa County Levee District 8, Iowa River, IA Mississippi-Fox River Drainage District #2 Levee, MO Old Canal Levee-Des Moines River, Lee, IA St. Francisville Levee, MO Zempel-Mutual, IL 28-19 $ 224,056 3,136 83 25 83 - 45 124 83 39,354 325,371 183,715 2,642 49 241,844 13,797 18,933 40,864 164,908 36,694 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water1 Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with flat 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lockport pools. is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 28-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Tlln1; i - - - - - - 9 7 3 AQQ1 mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Peoria Starved Rock Marseilles Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Movable (wicket type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock 1939 1939 1933 1933 2,744,5921 3,381,0301 885,3151 1,853,7251 28-20 ,! ,'JfJ ~~ ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Dresden Island Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 $ 2,503,3761 (tainter and gates) structural steel Brandon Road Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 2,031,683' (tainter and gates) structural steel Lockport Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 133,6081 (Bear trap) and (Bear trap) structural steel T.J. O'Brien Concrete Piles in clay Fixed Concrete Piles in clay 1960 6,954,7001 and sheet and sheet piling piling Lock and dam - - - - - - 1,250,3041 equipment Total locks - - - - - - $ 24,471,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 28-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers $ 2,135,3581 Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places 813,4181 Starved Rock to Lockport 3,650,635 Starved Rock to Grafton 2,686,307 Calumet-Sag Channel 19,238,200 Peoria small boat harbor 24,9371 Protection piers at all locks 77,6131 Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design 5,141,474 Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration 5,466,804 Rebuild highway bridges 19,327,850 Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel 20,828,4351 Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 18,362,0411 Recreation Facilities, Code 711 445,000 Removal of Blue Island lock 288,6001 Grand Calumet River controlling works2 St. Louis District 1,081,6001 Total additional features $ 99,569,604 Total existing project $124,041,436 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. 28-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 28-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 1. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams - - IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL TABLE 28-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $118,317,646 $221,855,623 $72,855,889 $413,029,158 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $124,137,317 $221,855,623 $72,855,889 $418,848,829 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such the operation and care of the works of improvement under the purposes. 28-22 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri river (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge of 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 29-C, 29-D, 29-E and 29-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. Estimated cost for new work (1982) is $894,157,300 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. See House document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and main- Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). tain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA, Davenport (Lindsay Park); IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL, have been complied with. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) Operations during fiscal year. St. Paul District. New Work: Under Section 107 authority, an initial appraisal was completed at Lake Pepin, Wisconsin at a cost of $7,500. Studies were continued under Section 107 for the establishment of a small-boat harbor at Guttenberg, Iowa at a cost of $40,066. Total new work costs were $47,566. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM 29-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 A. THOMPSON removed 687,980 cubic yards of material at 11 locations at a cost of $1,222,046. Government derrick barge HAUSER removed 4,200 cubic yards of material at 2 locations for $66,924. Government pipeline dredge DUBUQUE removed 15,040 cubic yards at 2 locations at a cost of $223,669. Mechanical dredging contract costs were $941,998. Contracts for dredging, dredging at Weaver Bottoms, and Pool 1 site preparation cost $211,896, $532,901, and $690,858, respectively. Dredging surveys cost $468,231. Other dredging and snagging cost $244,784. Water quality testing for dredging cost $71,691. Painting at lock and dams cost $741,068. Scour repair contracts at Locks and Dams 2, 5A, and 10 cost $666,863, $145,898 and -$149,000, respectively. Contracts for spillway repair at Lock and Dam 9, spillway resurfacing and straightening at Lock and Dam 10, and general dam maintenance cost $9,160, $4,826, and $11,208, respectively. Contracts for construction of handicapped facilities at Lock and Dam 9, for loading dock and park at Lock and Dam 7 cost $40,000, $313,473, and $2,153, respectively. Road repair contracts at Locks and Dams 1 and 5 cost $39,068 and $13,983, respectively. Supply and equipment contracts for mechanical materials at Locks and Dams 2-10, for tow haulage units at Locks and Dams 2 and 4-10, for air compressors, for equipment replacement, for generator sets, for electrical equipment, for computer processing equipment and for processing and channel sweeping system cost $119,459, $608,800, $37,198, $8,992, $51,026, $70,983, $80,000 and $477,937, respectively. Contracts for construction of storage building at Lock and Dam 5A, the installation of security fencing at Lock and Dam 3, for revising the radio backbone system and for purchasing a portable sandblasting unit cost $200,000, $16,338, $87,389, and $10,727, respectively. Maintenance costs for small-boat harbors at Lake City, Minnesota and Winona, Minnesota were $27,196 and $13,000, respectively. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $1,329,726 and by contract for $334,245. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. The total cost of maintenance was $12,493,309. Total cost of operating and care was $11,585,502. Costs to St. Paul District were $47,566 for new work and $24,068,811 for operation and maintenance, for a total of $24,116,377. Rock Island District. New Work: A contractor earned $1,990,000 on Stage I, Rock Excavation contract, in Pool 15 with 27,600 cubic yards of rock and overburden being removed. Costs in connection with the commercial harbor at Dubuque, Iowa was $35,279. Total new work costs were $2,025,279. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline Dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, and 21 at a cost of $991,300 with 744,206 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $49,300. Snagging, clearing and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $19,100. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance activities cost $47,700. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $1,266,000. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $1,408,300. Contractor earned $17,700 for painting dam roller gates at Lock and Dam 15, and another contractor earned $142,100 for painting dam roller and tainter gates and service bridge at Lock and Dam 17. Contractor earned $154,700 for completion of upper bulkhead recesses at Lock and Dam 20. Lock and Dam access road and parking improvements were completed by contract at a cost of $17,000. Contractors earned $255,300 for road surfacing at three fee public use areas. Energy rehab of the central control station at Lock and Dam 21 was completed by contract at a cost of $210,000. Contractor installed culvert bulkheads and hoist at Lock and Dam 19 at a cost of $150,300. Contractor substantially completed installation of upper bulkhead recesses at Locks and Dams 21 and 22 at a cost of $590,900. Maintenance of roads and bridges was performed at a cost of $68,400 and maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities totalled $5,100. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $605,400 and maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $455,200. Maintenance of levees cost $471,100 and boundary monumentation was performed by contract at a cost of $94,900. Engineering and design work including preparation of design memorandums totalled $646,100. Supervision and administration for maintenance features cost $483,200. Total maintenance costs were $8,149,100. Net credits to the project were $19,200, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation o the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $7,339,700. Real estate management services were performed at a cost of $184,700. Natural resource activities cost $227,900. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitor Center were operated at a cost of $916,000, with contract law enforcement provided at a cost of $76,800. Surveys, various condition and operation studies and structural inspections cost $964,500. Water control management costs were $817,200; amount of $54,300 was expended on Master Plans; and $10,400 was expended on various investigations and reports. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $247,100. Total operation costs we're $10,838,600. Total operation and maintenance costs were $18,968,600. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation for Lock and Dam 20 29-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN was initiated at a cost of $1,185,900. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for new Lock and Dam 26 were $162,919 for real estate acquisition, $2,424,942 for relocations, $8,410,046 for the dam, $62,483,189 for the lock, $5,111 for levees and floodwalls, $3,285 for permanent operating equipment, $2,711,833 for engineering, and $4,429,136 for supervision and administration. Costs incurred for 2nd lock were $3,297,844 for engineering and $215,906 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $84,144,211. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $4,188,795. Costs to St. Louis District were $84,144,211 for new work and $9,371,882 for operation and maintenance for a total of $93,516,093. Condition at end of fiscal year: For information pertaining to locks, dams and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul district. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and Nos. 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City; Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totalling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Guidewall extension at Lock No. 3 (the uncompleted guidewall extensions at Lock Nos. 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category on April 13, 1973); realignment of channel at Wilds Bend; construction of small-boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN; and construction of additional recreational facilities. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Structures are in good condition. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: Construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hannibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pool 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock 15. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: construction of guidewall extension at 16, 18, and 21: mooring facilities at 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at 19 and 20; rock and/or congolmerate excavation in Pools 14, 15, 18, and 21; and construction of small-boat harbors at Keokuk, IA, and New Boston, IL. Planning for the small-boat harbor at Savanna, IL, is currently under way. Small-boat harbors at Bellevue, IA, Cassville, WI, Davenport (Credit Island), IA, and Fort Madison, IA are inactive or have been deauthorized. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive, consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year, was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams Nos. 24, 25, and 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam), except for guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall extensions at Locks Nos. 24 and 25. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 is under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools Nos. 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 1,742 acres have been acquired for Lock and Dam No. 26 replacement project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Locks and Dam, No. 26 and Missouri River. Total Federal costs of existing project to end of fiscal year for the three Districts was $139,808,449 of which $86,217,056 was for new work, $52,409,293 regular funds for operation and maintenance and $1,185,900 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 Mississippi River New Work 1 between Missouri River Approp.2 70,105,398 38,441,000 85,053,000 84,345,770 651,206,903 and Minneapolis, Cost3 67,081,730 42,157,597 84,591,964 86,217,056 651,686,562 Minnesota (Federal Maint. 4 Funds) Approp. 58,960,456 51,692,401 52,296,749 56,548,589 723,751,625 Cost 50,986,450 60,514,185 53,051,295 52,409,293 710,516 701 Rehab. Approp. 0 0 0 1,240,000 58,773,197 Cost. 1,214,556 99,623 1,797 1,185,900 58,719,097 (Contributed funds) New Work Approp. 400,000 512,160 -99,561 0 2,041,140 Cost 0 774,696 37,903 0 2,041,140 1. Includes $56,945,518 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes replacement Lock and Dam 26 funds $418,932,000. 3. Includes replacement Lock and Dam 26 funds $417,248,026. 4. Includes $8,504,026 for maintenance on previous project. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 29-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work1 $ 60,154,8132 $ 24,210,071 $ 9,071,214 $ 93,436,098 Maintenance3 288,667,373 - - 288,667,373 Rehabilitation 44,600,000 - - 44,600,000 Total 393,422,186 24,210,071 9,071,214 426,703,471 Rock New Work4 67,272,7455 17,403,322 11,338,865 96,014,932 Island Maintenance 6 253,279,233 - - 253,279,233 Rehabilitation 14,119,097 - - 14,119,097 Total 334,671,075 17,403,322 11,338,865 363,413,262 St. Louis New Work8 449,939,0497 10,282,566 2,440,266 462,665,681 Maintenance 167,753,794 - - 167,753,794 Total 617,692,843 10,282,566 2,440,266 630,415,675 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201.167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $417,248,026 for replacement of Lock and Dam 26. 29-4 LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion1 (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 - $ 18,203,000 Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam 5A Lock and Dam 6 Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock (Canal) Lock and dam 15 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville, WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556,7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton, IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire, IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire, IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island Rock Island, IL Lock and dam 457.2 1.8 above 16 Muscatine, IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.94 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. piles. 56 400 35.94 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 56 400 35.9 - 12.57 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 1106 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel, and and gravel. broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel. gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 64 100 100 57 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 95 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 12,382,0005 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 C t'I 8,706,000 4,865,000* 5,081,000* 8,009,000* Z 4,874,000 C) 0 5,574,000* 6,061,000* z 6,539,000* z 4,750,000* Z 7,428,000 0r 5,580,000 7,502,000 z 6,284,000 _10 10,525,000 98 1937 9,788,000 TABLE 29-C to m TABLE 29-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Chain- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 19.39 $ 5,843,000 17 Boston, IL and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,000 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock. 100 1913 19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,00012 Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and 97 1936 6,281,000 20 Canton, MO piles in sand and gravel. Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,000 21 Quincy, IL and gravel, and gravel. Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 99 1938 5,275,000 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 9914 1940 10,337,000 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 9914 1939 13,694,000 25 MO and gravel. and gravel. Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 100 1938 12,824,000 26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. Rainey Dam) New Lock and 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 56 - 747,480,000 dam 26 bedrock. bedrock. New Lock and 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 2 - 214,000,000 dam 26 (2nd bedrock. bedrock. Lock) Total, Locks and dams $ 1,189,921,000 1. Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment; pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Land ward lock. 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14: previous project cost $540,000. 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 13. Includes cash contribution of $3,950,000. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. * Excludes uncompleted guidewall extensions $10,339,000 (1972) reclassified from active to inactive on April 13, 1973. tT1 ~T1 tTl tTl CO T1 TABLE 29-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Miles above Location Type depth Percent Estimated Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Harriet Island Harbor, 840.2 In city of St. Paul, MN Small-boat 5 70 925 0 $ 283,0001 St. Paul, MN St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Cassville Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA New Boston Harbor, IL Fort Madison Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 In city of Pepin, WI 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN 751.3 Upper end of Alma, WI 726.0 In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, IA 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 606.6 At Cassville, WI 579.4 At Dubuque, IA 537.3 At Savanna, IL 519.0 At Clinton, IA 488.0 At Moline, IL 484.2 At Lindsay Park 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 433.1 383.7 At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA In Boston Bay At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial4 Small-boat 4 Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat Small-boat 9 400-1,000 2.7(mile) 100 300 400 100 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 400 400 5 12 5555 120 340 280 400 230 200 500 100 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 500 100 1,000 100 6,000 100 800 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 565 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 100 0 100 0 78 100 100 1,100 100 40 150 200 90-135 250 435 950 1,890 600 900 100 100 100 0 100 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,8002 8,700 39,5003 6 93,500 1,007,0005 205,5006 41,700 56,300 89,800 t1 84,700 95,300 C 85,000 0 93,100 z 178,000 55,200 310,000 101,912 Z 110,328 Z 262,100 31,000 0 21,000 353,000 Z 23,000 184,200 TABLE 29-D (Cont,d) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name OhioRive Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Keokuk Harbor, IA 363.5 At Keokuk, IA Small-boat 5 100-600 1,015 0 394,000 Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 7 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $5,077,240 1. In addition, local interests will contribute $283,000. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 3. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 4. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $812,559. 6. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 7. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. 0000 t!1 0 0 C) O ~T1 0 tTI tTl O j tTl z rr CD 00 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 29-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between lock and dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 5,304,900 8,152,800 545,000 193,600 1,312,9002 14,613,1003 $468,584,858 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 29-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1986 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1986 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 80,077 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 5,821,440 Total project (No. 362) $5,901,517 29-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 29-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN, channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite Hamburg, IL harbor.1 Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.2 None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Co. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong. 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. 29-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 29-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st districts caused by operation of navigation pools. sess. July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 3, 1909 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None adequate facilities for existing navigation. July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna,1 Moline, H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Andalusia, New Boston,1 Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue,' Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville,' WI. Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None Nov. 7, 1966 Commercial Harbor facilities at Fort Madison, IA.3 H. Doc. 507, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 1. Deferred. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 86. 29-11 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * This district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of DuPage and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and LaPorte County along Lake Michigan. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN ........... 30-2 2. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN ... 30-2 3. Chicago Harbor, IL ................... 30-3 4. Chicago River, IL ..................... 30-3 5. Indiana Harbor, IN .................. 30-4 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN ............... 30-5 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL ................... 30-5 8. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .. 30-6 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 30-6 Alteration of Bridges 10. Other Authorized Bridge Alteration ...... 30-6 Beach Erosion Control 11. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection Beverly Shores, IN .................. 30-6 TABLES 30-A 30-B 30-C 30-D 30-E 30-F 30-G Page 12. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................. 30-6 13. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization ......................... 30-6 Flood Control 14. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) ....... 30-6 15. Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL ........... 30-7 16. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . 30-7 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 30-7 General Investigations 18. Surveys .... .......................... 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 20. Research and Development .............. 21. National Emergency Preparedness ...... TITLE 30-8 30-8 30-8 30-8 PAGE Cost and Financial Statement ....................... 30-9-10 Authorizing Legislation ................................. 30-11-12-13 Existing Projects ..................................... 30-14 Other Authorized Bridge Alteration ........................ 30-15 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects ................. 30-15 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 30-15 Reconnaissance and Condition Survey .................... 30-15 30-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago harbor. (see NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Existing Project. Provides for (a) north breakwater 4,646 feet long; (b) an outer west bulkhead 1,176 feet long; (c) a west bulkhead shore connection 2,300 feet long; (d) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (f) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; (g) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 27 October 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army to reimburse The State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Seven berths and docks are available, three on the west harbor arm, one on the harbor basin, and three on the east harbor arm. One dock on the west harbor arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east harbor arm is used for receipt of iron ore pellets and limestone and shipment of steel products. Five facilities are administered by the Indiana Port Commission and are used for handling general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys performed by Detroit District were credited $6,393 for prior year work. A shore erosion study was completed by hired labor at a cost of $3,465. Plans and specifications were developed by hired labor for an emergency stone placement at the north breakwater at a cost of $13,361. The stone placement was performed by Detroit District at a cost of $154,007. Program management for these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $5,152. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $17,554,591 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 Federal and $15,900 non-Federal), and $3,954,691 for maintenance. 2. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within corporate limits of the city of Chicago, except for breakwaters, an approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stone filled double row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) a north pier 2,450 feet long; (d) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (f) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (g) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th street; (h) three turning basins designated as numbers 1,3 and 5; (i) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 30 August 1935, 14 July 1960, 23 October 1962, and 27 October 1965. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Chicago Regional Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ores and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Detroit District at a cost of $17,203. Plans and Specifications of the damaged southerly exterior breakwater were developed by hired labor at a cost of $17,795. Breakwater stone was purchased by contract at a cost of $257,080. Emergency placement by Detroit District (Cranebarge Manitowoc) of 5,600 tons of stone at the damaged breakwater was completed at a cost of $144,962. A major rehabilitation reconnaissance report was completed at a cost of $88,931. A previous year dredging contract was completed at a cost of $5,572. Water quality work was performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,397. A groundwater monitoring program was continued at the Chicago Area Confined Disposal Facility by hired labor at a cost of $78,008, and by contract at a cost of $282,194. Support by other Corps for groundwater monitoring amounted to $5,700. An O&M manual was continued for the CDF at a cost of $887. A boundary survey was performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,663. A demonstration dredging study was continued by St. Paul District (hydraulic Dredge Dubuque) at a cost of $340,178, by hired labor at a cost of $15,888, and by contract at a cost of $8,477. A CDF fence survey was performed by contract at a cost of $10,154 and by hired labor at a cost of $6,577. A previous year dredging contract was credited $6,000 for damages. Value engineering was debited $52,250. Supervision and contract administration were performed by hired labor at a cost of $33,968 and program management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $28,046. Under the dike disposal program, an O&M manual was completed at a cost of $63, and value engineering was debited $1,463. 30-2 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is 79% complete. Work remaining to be accomplished consists of widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street, and the inactive portion which consists of closing the gap between the breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $47,075,334, of which $21,722,594 was for new work ($18,685,991 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $23,827,072 regular runds for maintenance, $836,667 non-Federal funds for maintenance, and $689,001 regular funds for rehabilitation. 3. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928). Previous projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib shore arm extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubber-mound and stone filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of 582 foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304 foot shore return, and a 754 foot gap; (f) a stone filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and exterior breakwater southerly extension 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an inner basin 21 feet deep; (j) an entrance channel 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 11 July 1870, 14 June 1880, 3 March 1899, 25 July 1912, 2 March 1919 and 23 October 1962. See table 30-C. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. The deep draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep and uses a steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government, pursuant to Public Law 98-63, approved 30 July 1983, Section 107 of the Public Law 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and nonmetallic minerals. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys and breakwater surveys were performed by other Corps at a cost of $24,646. A boundary survey was performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,080, and by contract at a cost of $54,474. The breakwater planning appraisal study was continued by hired labor at a cost of $31,922. A lock operations contract was continued with International Research and Development, Inc. for $404,590. Other Corps support for operations of the lock amounted to $31,279. A geotechnical stability study of the lock was performed by hired labor at a cost of $14,978. Plans and specifications of the lock electrical system was performed by hired labor at a cost of$183,030. Periodic Inspections of the lock continued at a cost of $76,652. Lock supplies were purchased at a cost of $10,931. Replacement of the bubbler system was performed by contract at a cost of $16,751. Emergency gate repairs were performed by contract at a cost of $17,900. Investigation of the North Pier and Foundation Exploration were performed by contract at a cost of $93,362, and by hired labor at a cost of $8,642. Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $12,188, and by contract at a cost of $27,353. Engineering and design for a dredge project was performed by hired labor at a cost of $17,359. Dredging to remove 31,000 cubic yards of shoaling was performed by contract at a cost of $347,250. Value engineering was debited in the amount of $18,457. Contract administration and program management for these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $67,265 and $23,045, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $15,854,649, of which $4,342,822 was for new work, $10,185,227 for maintenance, and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the city of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928). Previous projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21 foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. All dredging to within 20 feet of existing docks. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 2 March 1907, and 24 July 1946. Portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 is in deferred- for-restudy category. See table 30-C. 30-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of 24 July 1946 which provided improvement of channel is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Detroit District at a cost of $7,548. Environmental Impact Statement was developed by hired labor at a cost of $97,918. Under the Lake Michigan Water Diversion monitoring program, data collection of water control and water quality activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $260,385, by other Corps at a cost of $38,009, by contract at a cost of $68,561 and by other Government at a cost of $54,974. Engineering and design for a dredging project was performed by hired labor at a cost of $21,634. Dredging to remove 31,000 cubic yards of shoaling was performed by contract at a cost of $347,250. Supply and maintenance costs were $6,044. Supervision and contract administration for these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $30,225, and project management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,968. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act. Head of navigation for deep draft vessels are North Avenue, 5.97 miles from Michigan Avenue Bridge. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $8,979,519 of which $544,679 was for new work and $8,434,840 was for maintenance. 5. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped concrete caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubble mound extention 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 4 March 1913, 2 March 1919, 20 March 1922, 3 July 1930, 30 August 1935, 26 August 1937, and 14 July 1960. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Act of 1937 provides enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal shall not be undertaken until local interests furnish a right-of-way 300 feet wide and construct substantial bulkheads along channel on established lines shown on map accompanying Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 13, 75th Congress, 1st session, provided that improvement on one side may proceed in any section on fulfillment of conditions for that side of section, and provided further, that south of turning basis at The Forks (beginning 450 feet south of intersection of present Calumet Branch and mainstem bulkhead lines), widening and deepening by the United States shall be done only as rights-of-way and bulkheads on at least one side of the channel are continuously provided southward from above limit of turning basin at The Forks. To provide for 300-foot channel, a parcel of land (of about 4.6 acres), generally 100 feet wide, lying on east side of Calumet River Branch, commencing at north side of 141st Street and extending northward toward The Forks for about 2,170 feet, has been conveyed to and accepted by the United States. Local interests constructed about 1,350 feet of bulkhead along east side of Calumet River Branch, and reconstructed bulkhead on west side from The Forks to 141st Street. Defense Plant Corp. built a bulkhead along east side of canal between Pennsylvania Railroad Co.'s bridge and Dickey Place Bridge; the United States widened and deepened east side of this portion of widening. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. constructed a bulkhead along west side of canal between Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. bridge and the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. bridge, and the United States widened and deepened west side of this portion of widening. All prior requirements fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks for handling iron ore and limestone. Six docks for handling petroleum products. Three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering services for an Environmental Impact Statement associated with a confined disposal facility were completed at a cost of $142,186. Engineering and design for a confined disposal facility were continued by hired labor at a cost of $259,906 and by other Corps and Government Agencies at a cost of $3,296. Architectural and mapping of a confined disposal facility were performed by contract at a cost of $42,628. A research and development program was continued with the Waterway Experiment Station at a cost of $235,687. Monitoring of this activity was performed by hired labor at a cost of $18,540. 15,000 tons of riprap stone was purchased at a cost of $507,803. Program management and contract administration for these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $14,347. 30-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $13,063,082, of which $11,432,541 was Regular Funds, $1,618,041 was Public Works Funds, and $12,500 was Contributed Funds. Of the total cost, $4,848,980 was for new work and $8,214,102 was for maintenance. 6. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in LaPorte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Previous projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (i) an outer basin 12 feet deep; (j) an outer basin 8 feet deep; (k) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1889, 3 March 1905, 21 January 1927, 30 August 1935, and Section 107 of 14 July 1960 approved on 30 September 1966. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Plans and specifications for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was initiated by hired labor at a cost of $19,746. Program management cost was $2,738. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $7,568,723 of which $1,287,057 was for new work ($1,256,257 Federal and $30,800 non-Federal funds), $4,662,996 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 7. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14904 and 14905). Previous projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone filled double row steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone filled timber crib south pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone filled double row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 13 June 1902, 3 July 1930, and 2 March 1945. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Detroit District at a cost of $10,170. Environment dredging studies and monitoring activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,839 and by contract at a cost of $2,563. Water quality activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $9,513. Inspection and reports were credited for $2,414. Engineering services for maintenance and repair of the North Pier were performed by hired labor at a cost of $13,446 and by contract at a cost of $351,952. Supervision and contract administration were performed by hired labor at a cost of $50,577. Plans and specifications for a dredging project were developed by hired labor at a cost of $25,003. FY 1985 dredging contract was completed at a cost of $150,248. Supervision and contract admiinistration for this project were $30,998. Engineering services for a south pier inspection report were completed by hired labor at a cost of $3,624. Program Management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $22,572. Under the dike disposal program: Engineering and design were developed by hired labor at a cost of $80,235. Program management of these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $676. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $6,346,915, of which $604,793 was for new work and $5,742,122 was for maintenance. 30-5 -REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 8. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Detroit District at a cost of $76,629 (see table 30-G for project cost). Project maps were printed by Government Printing Office at a cost of $20,623. Quarry testing was performed by other Corps at a cost of $4,401. Aerial photos were performed by contract at a cost of $32,516. Office supplies were purchased at a cost of $4,760. Engineering services for these activities were $17,034 and real estate services were $2,864. Water quality studies and analyses were performed by hired labor at a cost of $19,224 and by contract at a cost of $13,847. Inspection and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $32,788. Program management for these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $54,079. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1986 SBH Burns Waterway, IN $107,727 Lake Mich. No. Shore Channel, IL 7,500 Lake Mich. No. Chicago, IL 7,500 Lake Calumet SBH, IL 23,226 Michigan City Harbor, IN 9,514 Alteration of Bridges 10. OTHER AUTHORIZED ALTERATION BRIDGE See table 30-D. Beach Erosion Control 11. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Existing Project. Provides for 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of rip rap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Law 97-88 and Public Law 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. No work was performed in FY 86. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1986 were $660,000 for new work. 12. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-E. 13. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Project and Location Langdon Park, Wilmette, IL Lloyd Park, Winnetka, IL Fiscal Year Costs to September 30,1986 $1,869 6,941 Flood Control 14. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 31 December 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of 7 March 1974. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all cost in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. Assurance of local cooperation for this act was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non- Federal interests paying 25 per centum of the cost of maintenance. 30-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design for 1983 clean-up work was credited $15,451 due to final cost allocation. Federal funds in the amount of $15,962 were expended for the 1985 debris removal project for snagging and clearing. Supervision and contract administration were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,041. Contributed funds from the local sponsor, Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago were expended in the amount of $7,637 for the 1983 project and $18,821 for the 1985 project. For the 1984 project: Engineering and design were performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,270. Supervision and Inspection were performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,675. For the channel excavation and bank stabilization project, engineering and design were continued by hired labor at a cost of $5,546. Contractual services were performed at a cost of $89,340, and real estate services at a cost of $1,449. For the 1986 project, engineering and design were performed by hired labor at a cost of $25,339. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986 were $1,927,085 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds) and $1,695,201 was for maintenance ($1,306,212 Federal funds and $388,989 contributed funds). 15. LAKE MICHIGAN, EDGE WATER /ROGERS PARK COMMUNITIES, CHICAGO, IL Location. On the Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan in City of Chicago (Cook County) from Hollywood- Ardmore Beach to Chicago-Evanston border. Existing Project. Construction of offshore breakwaters at Thorndale Avenue, Hartigan Park and Beach, and in the Sherwin Avenue, Jarvis Avenue and Fargo Avenue area. Riprap revetments at Granville Avenue, Rosemont Avenue, and North Shore Avenue. Beach nourishment at Devon Avenue, Park and Beach. Seawall extension at Glenlake Avenue. Placement of Riprap revetment at Berger Park. The project was authorized by PL 99-190 section 123. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights of way, provide all required relocations, hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project, and contribute a minimum of twenty-five percent of the total project costs. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be executed prior to construction. Operation and results during period. New Work: Plans and specifications were initiated for a total cost of $113,972 at the following locations: Fiscal Year Cost Project and Location to September 30, 1986 Lake Michigan-Granville Ave., Chicago, IL $ 5,400 Lake Michigan-Glenlake Ave., Chicago, IL $ 1,000 Lake Michigan-Thorndale Ave., Chicago, IL $ 8,200 Lake Michigan-Rosemont Ave., Chicago, IL $ 5,400 Lake Michigan-North Shore Ave., Chicago, IL $ 5,000 Lake Michigan-Fargo Ave., Chicago, IL $44,590 Lake Michigan-Jarvis Ave., Chicago, IL $44,382 Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is under design. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1986 were $113,972. 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-F. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Rehabilitation Emergency Operations Advance Measures Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1986 $171,205 67,062 54,888 18,949 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526. 79th Cong.). Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1986 Lake Michigan, Sunrise Park, Lake Bluff, IL $16,632 Lake Michigan, Lake Forest, IL 34,091 Lake Michigan, Devon Ave. Beach, Chicago, IL 2,329 Lake Michigan, Berger Park, Cook County, IL 26,380 Lake Michigan, Beverly Shores Road, IN 190,800 Lake Mich. Long Beach, LaPorte County, IN 16,819 Rosewood Beach Bath House, Highland Park, IL 5,861 Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1945, as amended. Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1986 Fox River, McHenry County, IL $102,991 Salt Creek, IN 7,500 Libertyville Estates, IL 20,509 Valleyview, IL 23,320 Wilmington, IL 108,589 30-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $102,000 were for: Flood Plain Management Services $102,000 18. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,731,656 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Special Investigations Coordination Studies Supplemental Pre-authorization Review for Deauthorization Continuation of Planning and Engineering $ 0 156,805 97,175 0 26,000 28,871 551,323 5,000 866,482 20. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Cost for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year was $2,069. 21. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal year costs of $156,990 were for: Training and Exercises Management and Mobilization Planning $69,451 87,539 30-8 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Section September in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 30, 1986 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 4. Chicago River, IL 5. Indiana Harbor, IN 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Contributed Funds) 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL 11. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Beverly Shores, IN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -64,000 -44,353 4,431,000 3,340,642 1,499,000 1,080,124 0 4,732 639,000 2 2,478,072 2 842,500 1,446,975 1,994,000 530,000 1,486,071 1,225,815 510,000 304,630 -13,000 -7,573 90,000 182,567 0 571,486 90,000 70,306 150,000 169,592 13,584,000 13,584,000 3,954,793 3,954,691 15,900 15,900 22,578,567' 22,578,567' ,679,000 985,000 23,865,7742 ,330,158 1,399,456 23,828,5982 689,001': 689,001': 836,667 836,667 4,788,8274 4,788,8274 685,000 1,507,000 10,280,286 653,159 1,488,154 10,185,227 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,5655 1,500,5655 431,000 970,000 8,635,7376 385,246 941,516 8,544,3036 4,897,148 9 4,897,148 9 236,123 1,365,000 434,483 1,075,541 20,000 18,685 566,671 504,344 0 0 0 1,315 507,000 309,456 00 981,000 1,224,393 25,000 22,484 8,269,7788 8,216,611" 1,543,646' 1,543,646 1' 4,665,512 4,662,996 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 823,026" 823,026" 380,000 5,767,98012 753,002 5,757,83312 0 660,000 0 660,000 30-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 30-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Section September in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 30, 1986 14. Chicago River, IL New Work: North Branch Approp. 191,884 (Federal Funds) Cost 191,884 Maint.: Approp. 150,000 50,000 230,000 66,000 1,343,000 Cost 133,907 78,167 243,775 137,171 1,306,212 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. 40,000 Cost 40,000 Maint.: Approp. 0 60,000 60,000 111,600 531,600 Cost 63,367 5,956 74,415 26,458 388,989 15. Lake Michigan- New Work: Edgewater/ Approp. 121,000 121,000 Rogers Park Cost 113,972 113,972 Communities, Chicago, IL 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2. Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608] regarding removal of flue-dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3. In settlement pursuant to decree [No. 54-C-1608] regarding removal of flue-dust. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. Excludes $12,500 contributed funds. Includes $287,389 for previous projects. Includes $218,233 on previous projects. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 30-10 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935' 2 Aug. 30, 1935' 2 Mar. 2, 1945: July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths: North Breakwater, West Bulkhead, Approach Channel and Outer Harbor, East and West Harbor Arms. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 2 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide to 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor; and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J.&-E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J.&-E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge [Nickel Plate] to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 3 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 4 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896 Turning basins. Public Law, 89-298, H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896 pp. 2584 et seq. and H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 54th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 H. Doc. 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess.5 H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 1562- 1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790- 2791 H. Doc. 710, Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong. 2d sess. Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63 Specified in act. Specified in act. 30-11 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 19301' June 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 19351 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feel deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 5 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co. about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths to 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J.&-E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess. [Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report, 1909, p. 709]. H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess." H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess.8 Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report, 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report, 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, pp. 2264-2266. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 2903- 2904. Joint resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 30-12 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, Rivers and Harbors Committee dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. through east pier. Sept. 30, 1966 Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper Detailed Project Report June Sec. 107 turning basin to E Street bridge. 1965.8 July 14, 1960 WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 7 of Text) June 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. Annual Report, 1880, p. 1942 Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162. June 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st sess. inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. July 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of Rivers and Harbors Committee north pier, and enlarging inner basin. Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st sess. outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Dec. 17, 1970 Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d sess." Sec. 201 outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to the depth in Lake Oct. 27, 1965 Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone Public Law 97-88. revetment initially constructed in 1973. July 30, 1983 Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore Public Law 98-63. protection measures. LAKE MICHIGAN-EDGEWATER/ROGERS PARK COMMUNITIES, CHICAGO, IL Dec. 15, 1985 Provides for emergency bank stabilization, shore protection Public Law 99-190 and flood control work. 1 Tncluded in Public Works Administration Program 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch Sept. 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.] 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [breakwater closure.] 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen Lake George Branch] 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 [widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch.] 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 30-13 CHICAGO. IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-C EXISTING PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway North Breakwater 4.646 - - 2. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 3. Chicago Harbor, IL 4. Chicago River, IL 5. Indiana Harbor, IN 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL Harbor, IN Outer West Bulkhead Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Approach channel Outer Harbor River entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning basin No. 3 to turning basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension into Lake Calumet Turning basins 1, 3, and 5 Shore arm extension Exterior breakwater Exterior breakwater southerly ext. North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North pier Approach channel Channel and maneuver area Lock Inner basin Entrance channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Northerly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Canal Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch Detached breakwater West pier East pier East breakwater Entrance channel Main channel Outer basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North breakwater and Shore Connection North pier and North Revetment South pier Entrance Channel Channel to inner basin Inner basin Anchorage Area 3,476 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 6,714 5,007 2,450 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,100 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 1,304 835 2,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,896 2,074 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650-' 400 Varies 620 620 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 390 200 375-500 80 'Area of about 6 acres. 30-14 30 28 27 27 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 18 18 8-12 86 22 18 18 8 TABLE 30-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 - 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6[g] of the Act of October 15, 1966, P.L. 89-670. TABLE 30-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 12 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 - Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 - Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 - Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 - 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance KANKAKEE RIVER, IL AND IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IL AND IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN' 1968 53,136 - Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 'Classified inactive to November 1971. TABLE 30-G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 8 of Text) Date Reconnaissance or Condition Survey Project Conducted Cost Burns Waterway Harbor, IN May 1986 $ 4,748 Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN Apr., June, Aug. 1986 43,758 Chicago Harbor, IL Sept., Oct. 1986 -2,000' Indiana Harbor, IN Oct., Dec. 1985, Mar. 1986 17,144 Michigan City Harbor, IN Aug. 1986 166 Waukegan Harbor, IL July, Sept., Oct. 1986 -4051 Beveraly Shores, IN May, Sept. 1986 13,038 Burns Small Boat Harbor, IN Sept. 1986 180 'Cost reflects an adjustment as a result of condition surveys performed in 1985. 30-15 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum- 1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI............ ........... 31-2 2. Ashland Harbor WI................ ........... 31-2 3. Big Suamico, WI ............................ 31-2 4. Black River, (U.P.) MI........................31-3 5. Bolles Harbor, MI............................31-3 6. Charlevoix Harbor, MI........................31-3 7. Cheboygan Harbor, MI......................31-4 8. Clinton River, MI..............................31-4 9. Cornucopia Harbor, WI........................31-4 10. Detour Harbor, MI............................31-4 11. Detroit River, MI.............................31-5 12. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI............ 31-5 13. Fox River, WI...............................31-6 14. Frankfort Harbor, MI.........................31-6 15. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI....... 31-7 16. Grand Marais Harbor, MN.....................31-7 17. Green Bay Harbor, WI.......................31-7 18. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI....................31-8 19. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI......................31-8 20. Harrisville Harbor, MI.........................31-8 21. Holland Harbor, MI...........................31-9 22. The Inland Route, MI.........................31-9 23. Kenosha Harbor, WI ........................ 31-10 24. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ....................... 31-10 25. Keweenaw Waterway, MI .................... 31-10 26. Knife River Harbor, MN....................31-11 27. LaPointe Harbor, WI.......................31-11 28. Lake St. Clair, MI Channels ................... 31-11 29. Leland Harbor, MI............ ........... 31-12 30. Lexington Harbor, MI ....................... 31-12 31. Little Lake Harbor, MI ....................... 31-12 32. Ludington Harbor, MI......................31-12 33. Mackinac Island Harbor, MI ................... 31-13 34. Mackinaw City Harbor, MI .................... 31-13 35. Manistee Harbor, MI ......................... 31-13 Navigation (cont.) Page 36. Manitowoc Harbor, WI....................... 31-14 37. Marquette Harbor, MI ........................ 31-14 38. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI....... 31-15 39. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ....................... 31-15 40. Monroe Harbor, MI .......................... 31-16 41. Muskegon Harbor, MI ........................ 31-16 42. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ..................... 31-16 43. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ....................... 31-17 44. Pensaukee Harbor, WI ........................ 31-17 45. Pentwater Harbor, MI ........................ 31-17 46. Petoskey Harbor, MI ......................... 31-18 47. Point Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River) MI ...... 31-18 48. Port Austin Harbor, MI ....................... 31-18 49. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ..................... 31-18 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ..................... 31-19 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI..................31-19 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI................. ..... 31-19 53. Racine Harbor, WI ........................... 31-19 54. Rouge River, MI ............................ 31-20 55. Saginaw River, MI........................ 31-20 56. St. Clair River, MI.............. ............ 31-21 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI.......................31-21 58. St. Marys River, MI.........................31-22 59. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI..... 31-23 60. Saxon Harbor, WI ........................... 31-23 61. Sheboygan Harbor, WI.......................31-23 62. South Haven Harbor, MI ..................... 31-24 63. Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI.................31-24 64. Tawas Bay Harbor, MI....................31-24 65. Two Rivers Harbor, WI......................31-24 66. White Lake Harbor, MI.......................31-25 67. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .......... 31-25 68. Other Authorized Navigation Projects...........31-25 69. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization.... 31-25 31-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Beach Erosion Control Page 70. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects.......31-25 71. Emergency Shore Protection.................. 31-25 72. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ............................ 31-26 73. Mitigation of Shore Damages..................31-26 Flood Control 74. Kawkawlin River, MI....................... 31-26 75. Saginaw River, MI......................... 31-26 76. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI ............... 31-27 77. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...31-28 78. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.........31-28 79. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ....... 31-28 80. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters....... 31-29 General Investigations Page 81. Surveys .................................... 31-31 82. Continuation of Planning and Engineering....... .31-31 83. Collection and Study of Basic Data............. 31-31 Tables Table 31-A Cost & Financial Statement............. 31-33 Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation.................31-46 Table 31-C Features of Existing Project............. 31-58 Table 31-D St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ... .31-59 Table 31-E Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams.......... 31-60 Table 31-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys..... 31-61 Table 31-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 31-62 Table 31-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. .31-63 Table 31-I Deauthorized Projects.................. 31-63 1. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,086. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $27,744, removing approximately 7,102 cubic yards of shoal material by hydraulic dredge. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor using the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $80,902. Engineering and design for repair to north and south piers was performed at a cost of $1,765. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $19,121. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in good condition with some sections in need of major repair. Total cost at the end of FY for existing project was $1,254,817. 2. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $28,764. Breakwater repairs were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $84,305. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made in prior year costs for structure repairs. Supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $36,534. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $4,305,993, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $2,610,348 for maintenance. 3. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI Location. A small stream which flows easterly into Green Bay, an arm of Lake Michigan. Mouth of the river is about 8 miles north of Green Bay Harbor, and about 44 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14910.) Existing project. An entrance channel 8 feet deep which extends from that depth in Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth, with widths of 100 feet in bay and 60 feet in river, total length of channel is about 3,700 feet. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower 1.5 miles of river, used by local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,757. 31-2 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project was completed in 1938. Dredging channel was started in September 1938 and completed in November 1938. Total costs to end of FY were $195,605. 4. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,645. Project was completed in June 1958. A triangular-shaped rock shoal 50 feet wide at easterly end extends along southerly side of channel. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $960,363, of which $383,350 was for new work and $577,013 for maintenance. 5. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $33,586. Engineering and design for repair of Diked Disposal Facility was ompleted at a cost of $29,879. A contract for repair of Dike Disposal Facility was awarded this FY in the amount of $151,032. Approximately 53% of the contract was completed at a cost of $80,000. Engineering and design for dredging cost $5,916. Supervision and administration cost $4,034. The existing project was completed in 1970 (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for the upstream 800 feet). Total costs to the end of FY were $2,665,485, of which $426,413 was for new work ($255,000 contributed funds) and $2,239,072 for maintenance. 6. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $652,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake, Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks 31-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $29,072. Repairs to South Pier and Revetment were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $74,126. Engineering and design for repair of South Pier Section "A" was performed at a cost of $47,048. Engineering, design and supervision cost $4,322. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits. Total costs to end of FY were $6,324,259, of which $180,623 was for new work, $5,014,240 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352) and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 7. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock in Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Improvement is 12,000 feet long, on which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,663. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made in cost for structure repair previously performed. Total costs to end of FY were $1,364,477 of which $504,236 was for new work and $860,241 for maintenance. 8. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its source in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along the river below the City. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,662. Engineering and design for construction of confined disposal facility to be performed by contract next FY continued at a cost of $72,663. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total costs to end of FY were $2,027,958, of which $549,798 (including $289,752 contributed funds) was for new work, and $1,478,160 for maintenance. 9. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $10,734. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Total costs to end of FY were $1,293,778, of which $462,653 was for new work and $831,125 for maintenance. 10. DETOUR HARBOR, MI Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing an 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,305-foot breakwater. The total estimated (October 1981) project cost is $2,650,000; the Federal cost is $1,400,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,250,000 which is a cash contribution. 31-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities will be provided by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,118. Existing project is complete. Total cost to end of FY is $2,569,123, of which $9,776 was for maintenance and $2,559,347 for new work. 11. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long and flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 31-C. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum--1955.) (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost of new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968 is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of water control center, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,171,191. Studies continued under extended navigation season at a cost of $252,295. An adjustment of -$5,009 was made to prior year costs for maintenance dredging performed by U.S. Hopper Dredge HAINS. Maintenance of disposal areas by hired labor cost $179,322. Location and removal of obstructions cost $1,286,002. The final cost and cubic yards for the dredging contract for East Outer and Lower Livingston Channel completed last FY is $107,273 and 22,214 cubic yards of shoal material. The contract awarded last FY for repair of Pointe Mouillee Diked Disposal Facility was completed at a cost of $209,987. A contract for dredging Pointe Mouillee Access Channel was awarded and completed at a cost of $187,196, removing 18,116 cubic yards of material. A contract for dredging East Outer and Lower Livingston Channels was awarded for $1,229,824. No dredging was performed this FY, however, cost incurred for mobilization was $49,954. Engineering and design for repair to disposal area cost $11,202. Other engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $158,324. A contract was awarded for construction of Wetland Marsh under Section 150 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1967. Approximately 99% of the contract is complete at a cost of $680,135. Engineering during construction, supervision and administration cost $24,617. The State of Michigan contributed $203,000 of the above cost. Work under the dike disposal program continued at a cost of $1,383. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. All work in Trenton Channel is complete. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 31-C. Costs for existing project were $188,697,179, of which $74,780,103 was for new work ($72,969,197 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Work Funds) and $113,918,459 for maintenance. 12. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels, (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for active portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: The contract awarded last FY for rehabilitation of North and South Piers Sections O, N-1, N and M is 65% complete at a cost of $4,577,329. Engineering and design, supervision and inspection cost $196,452. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, cooperative stream gaging, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $214,962. Studies under extended navigation season cost $6,221. Engineering and design for major rehabilitation of N. Pier Secitons O, N-l, N and M, and S. Pier Sections O, N-l, N and M cost $9,143. Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces at a cost of $315,847. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and pier was performed at a cost of $71,843. Repairs to breakwater and seawalls and safety maintenance were 31-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 performed by the COLEMAN and MARKUS at a cost of $554,677. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made in structure repair costs previously performed. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,842. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed with 112,625 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $478,724. A contract for maintenance dredging of contaminated materials was awarded this FY in the amount of $766,215. The contract is aproximately 12% complete with 11,361 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $100,000. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $198,043. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of existing project was $59,976,604, of which $16,109,258 was for new work and $36,801,888 for maintenance, and $7,065,458 for rehabilitation. 13. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI, and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and othewise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 31-E on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, boundary monumentation, miscellaneous inspections and reports, safety training and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $36,677. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $161,945. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $470,918. Tainter gates and seals were reconditioned at Menasha Dam and Kaukauna Dam at a cost of $77,780. Fox River O.S.H.A. Program and major miscellaneous items of supply totaled $21,039. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $155,641. Engineering and design costs were $19,141. Supervision and administration costs were $121,702. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 31-E for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing locks and dams are generally in fair to good condition. Costs for existing project to end of FY were $3,753,334 for new work and $36,855,061 for operation and maintenance; a total of $40,608,395. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 14. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-6 I)ETROIT. ,I1 DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $49,296. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are in good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $9,710,451, of which $1,955,159 (including $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $7,480,516 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 15. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan. 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $115,653. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to the south pier sections I, J, J-l, and K at a cost of $93,799. A payment of $118,522 was made this FY for a claim on the contract completed in FY 85 for repair of North and South Revetments. An adjustment of -$15,272 was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging at a cost of $210,033, removing approximately 33,564 cubic yards of shoal material from the outer harbors. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $93,209. Condition surveys, environmental studies, temporary permits, miscellaneous inspections and reports in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $54,951. Contract awarded last FY for beach nourishment was completed at a cost of $51,860. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $108,199. Another contract for mitigation of shore damage was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $936,324. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost for Section 111 was $53,253. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $25,179,796, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $22,907,714 for maintenance, and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 16. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,268. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $667. The contract for repair of the East and West Breakwater awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $988,359. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $61,739. Existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $3,647,770. 17. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Natucial Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000, Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed 31-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1985) is $5,220,000 Federal and $114,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $189,997. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $34,791. An adjustment of -$14,891 was made on a dredging contract awarded and completed last FY. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed removing approximately 120,143 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,101,792. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging of the Bay Section in the amount of $832,000. The contract is 22% complete with approximately 13,537 cubic yards being removed at a cost of $200,000. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $93,175. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $310,913. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railways Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. The total cost of the existing project was $32,299,640, of which $18,005,884 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,946,395 for new work and $22,353,245 for maintenance. The new work costs do not include $100,000 contributed funds. 18. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,430. Condition surveys and environmental studies in connection with the Section 111 project were performed at a cost of $26,647. The existing project was completed in 1965. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,568,900, of which $1,092,366 was for new work and $476,534 for maintenance. 19. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,751. An adjustment of -$40,000 was made this FY in structure repairs performed in FY 81. A contract to dredge the new Harbor marina was awarded and completed at a cost of $242,281 removing approximately 26,231 cubic yards of material. Engineering and design for repair of main breakwater was performed at a cost of $49,705. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $24,957. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $7,665,223, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $6,270,121 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 20. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Financial closeout on the Section 107 project was accomplished at a cost of $12,281. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,770. Condition surveys and en- 31-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT vironmental studies in conjunction with the Section 111 project cost $24,812. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $745. Total costs of project to end of FY were $3,471,061, of which $2,679,158 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $791,903 for maintenance. 21. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is in an active category as a result of a reclassification recommendation approved by the Office of the Chief of Engineers on August 20, 1981. Estimated cost of this portion (1985) is $3,510,000, Federal and $102,000 non-Federal (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by Act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rightsof- way, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, temporary permits, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $106,182. Repairs to North and South breakwater connector were performed this FY by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $76,987. A contract for maintenance dredging of the outer harbor was completed at a cost of $210,363, removing approximately 35,099 yards of dredge material. This contract was also for beach nourishment. An adjustment of -$30,436 was made to the contract completed last FY for maintenance dredging. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $475. Engineering and design for repair of South Revetment, Sections I thru P, was performed at a cost of $66,893. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $54,412. Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $36,426. A contract for mitigation of shore damage was completed at a cost of $112,250. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $70,029. Another contract for mitigation of shore damage was awarded this FY and completed at a cost of $548,130. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $62,084. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,392,827 for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $15,498,960 regular funds for maintenance, and $502,452 regular funds for rehabilitation, for a total of $17,394,225. 22. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the Village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the Village of Alanson at a cost of $33,525. An adjustment of -$24 was made in the closeout cost for operation of the lock during previous fiscal years by the Village of Alanson. In 1986 the lock was operated only on weekends from April 21 through April 29 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; from May 5 through September 30 it was open from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Condition surveys, cooperative stream gaging, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,165. 31-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total costs to end of FY were $3,524,356, of which $770,222 was for new work and $2,606,134 for maintenance with $148,000 contributed by local interests. 23. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1985) Federal cost is $698,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $43,000 non-Federal which includes $3,000 local contribution. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: $8,077 was spent in FY 86 on the Section 107 DPR which was terminated due to lack of local interest. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $71,655. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made in structure repair costs previously performed. Repairs to S. Pier and breakwater were performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $64,013. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging and repair of Confined Disposal Facility contract was completed at a cost of $42,157. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging and repair of Confined Disposal Facility in the amount of $573,519. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $11,091. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally good condition. The total costs of the existing project to end of FY were $9,079,819, of which $7,907,899 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $529,432 being for new work, $7,277,112 for maintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work costs do not include $3,000 contributed funds. 24. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $65,196. Minor repairs to diked disposal area were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,813. Repairs to CDF and N. Breakwaters were performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $57,248. Engineering and design for repair to N. Stub Pier Section A to be performed by contract next FY cost $73,962. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $26,788. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outer end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $7,872,406, of which $758,333 was for new work ($183,021 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief funds) $6,496,773 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 25. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed cost for new work is $5,967,700. Portion of project providing for extension of lower entrance breakwater and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels is inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1957) of this portion was $3,315,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $42,880. Engineering and design for major repairs of the upper entry revetment was completed at a cost of $100,878. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,444. The Derrickbarge COLEMAN performed breakwater repair at a cost of $244,321. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made in prior year costs for structure repairs. A contract for repair of E. and W. Revetments was awarded this FY in the amount of $2,348,800. The contract is approximately 9% complete at a cost this FY of $250,000. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $47,916. A contract for Construction of a Confined Disposal Facility was awarded for $902,706. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $220,193. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance, and major storm damage repairs needed for stone-covered portions of breakwater at upper entrance. Mooring pier at Lily Pond requires repairs to halt movement and permit dredging to project depth adjacent thereto. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $17,962,034, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $11,987,893 for maintenance. 26. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN Location. Near mouth of Knife River on north shore of Lake Superior, 19 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN, and 7 miles southwest of Two Harbors, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel with a system of overlapping breakwaters, using the existing breakwater and a new breakwater constructed of 731 feet of rock rubblemound. The entrance channel is 9 feet deep and an inner straight channel is 8 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 600 feet long with a public marina and side channel at its inner end. For additional details see page 1110 of Annual Report for 1963. A modification to correct a design deficiency was authorized in 1974. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Total estimated approved Federal cost (1985) is $2,571,000 and $21,700 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are to furnish easements on 15.08 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Local interests have installed pile-andtimber docks on both sides of straight channel. Lake County has completed construction by contract of a marina along the east wing of the inner harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,973. Project was completed in June 1958. Breakwater and spending beach are in good condition. The existing breakwater does not effectively prevent waves caused by northeasterly winds from entering the entrance channel. This results in unsatisfactory and unsafe harbor entrance conditions during storms. Mooring conditions in the main channel and Y-branches of the inner harbor are also adversely affected. Plans and specifications for the construction of a breakwater to correct a design deficiency to reduce wave damage and improve navigation conditions were completed and approved by NCD in 1982. Total project costs to end of FY were $704,118, of which $412,944 was for new work and $291,174 for maintenance. 27. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Apostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (Public Law 645, 86th Cong., as amended.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the Federal project. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,400. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of existing project at end of FY was $219,258. 28. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connection channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Centers, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $63,291. Environmental studies in connection with 31-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 the extended navigation season cost $43,480. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $16,906. An adjustment of -$32,990 was made to prior year costs for maintenance dredging performed by the U.S. Hopper Dredge MARKHAM. Engineering and design for removal of the trestle at Dickinson Island disposal area was completed at a cost of $10,589. A contract for removal of the trestle at Dickinson Island was awarded and completed at a cost of $150,000. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $9,387. Total costs for existing project at the end of FY were $19,929,949, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,010,582 regular funds and $1,008,595 public work funds) and $12,254,592 for maintenance. 29. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,638. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed this FY by hired labor at a cost of $143. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging this FY removing approximately 24,811 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $71,399. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $18,555. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. The total costs to end of FY were $2,610,737, of which $1,027,089 was for new work, $1,512,970 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 30. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, monitoring, inspections and reports under Section 111 were performed by Government forces at a cost of $39,634. A contract for beach nourishment awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $143,818. A contract for beach nourishment was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $198,000. Engineering, design, supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $25,945. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total costs of existing project were $3,940,406, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $833,214 for maintenance. 31. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies wee performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,122. The design deficiency study continued at a cost of $50,141. An adjustment of -$1,767 was made in cost for maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY for $196,819 with approximately 15,961 cubic yards of shoal material removed. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $15,814. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. Total cost at end of FY is $3,360,493. 32. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) 31-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwater, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $67,794. Repair to the North Breakwater was performed this FY using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $139,694. Engineering and design for repair to the North Revetment and South Breakwater was completed at a cost of $113,681. A contract for repairs to North Revetment and South Breakwater was awarded in the amount of $2,133,337. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $16,529. Under the Section 111 program, an adjustment of -$54,105 was made to the contract for Beach Nourishment completed last FY. Surveys, monitoring, supervision and administration cost $7,174. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $17,928,307, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $9,038,192 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 33. MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On the southeast side of Mackinac Island which lies just east of the Straits of Mackinac, the connecting waterway between Lakes Michigan and Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for the construction of two breakwaters 910 and 950 feet long from Mission and Biddle Points, respectively. The breakwaters are of rubblemound construction. Estimated (1969) Federal cost for new work is $230,000, excluding $105,000 to be contributed by local interest. (See Table 30-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consists of private piers used by small commercial vessels and light-draft passenger ferry boats. Facilities for recreational craft are provided by the State dock which is open to all on equal terms. These facilities satisfy current traffic requirements, however, they are usually hard pressed during the annual Chicago to Mackinac-Port Huron to Mackinac sailboat races. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Governemnt forces at a cost o $10,816. Engineering and design for repair of the east and west breakwater was performed at a cost of $11,207. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total costs to end of FY were $427,582, of which $334,089 ($105,004 Contributed Funds) was for new work and $93,493 for maintenance. 34. MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of extreme northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, on southerly shore of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, about 430 feet long, perpendicular to existing railroad pier; wave absorbing slope protection for about 300 feet along harbor side of railroad pier; an entrance channel 10 feet deep with a minimum width of 100 feet, and a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3.3 acres in extent with depths varying from 6 to 8 feet; and maintenance of outer 200-foot portion of existing north breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Additional public facilities are being planned by State and local agencies in addition to existing facilities owned by the Village of Mackinaw City but leased to a private marina operator. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,057. An adjustment of -$438 was made to minor structure repairs performed by hired labor last FY. Existing project is completed. Total costs of existing project to end of FY are $348,633, of which $272,572 (includes $136,286 contributed funds) was for new work and $76,061 for maintenance. 35. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional 31-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and miscellaneous reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $47,157. Repairs to safety features were performed at a cost of $12,602. Engineering and design for repair of the North Revetment was completed at a cost of $65,239. A contract was awarded in the amount of $700,000 for repair of the North Revetment. Approximately 63% of the work was completed at a cost of $441,000. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed at a cost of $168,658 removing approximately 32,506 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $56,878. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project from regular funds to end of FY were $9,197,573, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $5,126,887 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 36. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution, see Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension reaffirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for complete modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault of negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the City should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $64,723. Repairs to N. and S. Breakwaters and N. Stub Pier were performed by hired labor at a cost of $13,925. Minor repairs to the disposal area cost $244. Engineering and design for repair of S. Breakwater to be performed by contract next FY was initiated at a cost of $3,782. Engineering and design for repairs to the confined disposal facility awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $183,780. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $33,362. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Cost of existing project to end of FY was $3,959,991 for new work (includes $1,911,076 contributed funds) and $7,983,044 for maintenance; a total of $11,943,035. 37. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. 31-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,299. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $193,025. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $3,554,979, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $1,806,329 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 38. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, and about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,747. Repairs to N. Breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $32,318. An adjustment of -$523 was made to a contract for repairs to South Pier, Section D. Supervision and administration and liquidated damages to financially close-out this contract cost -$1,282. Engineering and design for site selection of a disposal facility for dredged material cost $62,142. Close-out of site selection under the diked disposal program cost $2,288. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. The costs of the existing project were $570,238 for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,369,039 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation; a total of $4,291,129. 39. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by City of Milwaukee and City of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of Way, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: The contract for major rehabilitation of the North Pier and North Breakwater awarded last FY is approximately 84% complete at a cost of $2,859,644. Engineering and design during construction cost $60,793. Engineering and design for Phase II of the rehabilitation project cost $25,600. Supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $243,500. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support for the water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $170,535. The General Design Memorandum for major rehabilitation of the Inner North Revetment and the detached North Breakwater cost $348. Hired labor maintenance of the diked disposal facility cost $1,958. Repair to S. Pier was performed by the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $138,988. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,626. Engineering and design for breakwater and revetment repair cost $7,726. Engineering and design for a dredging and CDF repair contract was completed at a cost of $14,736. A contract for maintenance dredging and CDF repairs was awarded 31-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 this FY in the amount of $1,994,470. No work was peformed this FY. Other engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $63,535. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humbolt Avenue. In recent years, some repairs were completed on the north shore breakwater; however, additional repairs are required. South breakwater and shore connections are in generally good condition. Costs of existing project were $8,231,024 for new work, $30,933,450 for maintenance, and $7,022,099 for rehabilitation; a total of $46,186,573. 40. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to City of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated costs of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $48,010. Maintenance of the disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $54,246. An adjustment of -$27,101 was made on prior year cost for maintenance dredging performed by the Hopper Dredge HAINS. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $1,205,425 removing approximately 38,416 cubic yards of material this FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded. It is approximately 99% complete with 47,067 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $314,999. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $995,723. No work was performed this FY. Engineering and design for repair of dike disposal cost $6,489. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $98,871. An adjustment of-$59,472 was made on the contract for construction of a confined disposal facility completed last FY. Engineering during construction, supervision and administration cost $35,979. Total costs to end of FY were $52,389,360, of which $987,340 was for new work (including $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), and $51,402,020 for maintenance including $166,667 contributed funds. ($125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company.) 41. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: The contract awarded in FY 84 for major rehabilitation of the North and South Revetment was completed at a cost of $1,307,023. Engineering and design during construction cost $41,100. Supervision and administration cost $120,481. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $68,844. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made for hired labor structure repairs from previous fiscal years. Safety maintenance and repairs to navigation structures were performed at a cost of $7,610. Location of a possible hazard to navigation was performed by contract at a cost $18,131. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $15,341. Condition surveys and environmental monitoring were performed in conjunction with the authorized Section 111 project at a cost of $38,544. A contract for beach nourishment was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $1,489,535. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $74,763. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $24,081,848, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $7,333,160 for maintenance, and $13,731,578 for rehabilitation. 42. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from 31-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $21,618. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $839. An adjustment of -$1,604 was made this FY to the maintenance dredging contract awarded and completed last FY. The contract for beach nourishment awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $622,186. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $21,079. Existing project is complete. Total costs at end of FY were $4,258,039, of which $1,285,716 was for new work and $2,972,323 for maintenance. Contributed funds were in the amount of $1,186,467. 43. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. This portion of project is inactive. (Estimated cost (1965) of this work is $6,040,000. (See Table 31 -B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorization. See page 1020 of Annual Report for 1965 for requirements of 1962 Act, Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A total of $77,669 was spent in FY 86 on two studies: $64,377 for the Section 205 Detailed Project Report, and $13,292 for the Section 103 study which was suspended because recreational benefits were excluded and the project then lacked economic justification. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $31,208. Repairs to the East Pier were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $196,485. Engineering and design for major repairs to navigation structures was performed at a cost of $30,696. A Reconnaissance Report on the proposed Major Rehabilitation was transmitted to NCD on March 19, 1986, with subsequent transmission to OCE on May 5, 1986. An adjustment of -$2,195 and -20,532 cubic yards of shoal material was made on a dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $474,998 removing approximately 101,150 cubic yards of material. A contract for maintenance dredging Area 3 was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $144,900, removing approximately 35,037 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $43,066. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Work authorized under the 1962 Act is in an inactive status. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $8,563,916, of which $874,468 was for new work and $7,689,448 for maintenance. 44. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Green Bay, about 22 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, and about 33 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1899, page 2734, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1429. Existing project. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at low water datum from the depth in Green Bay about 4,300 feet to mouth of Pensaukee River. Fluctuations of water level are seasonal changes of about one-half foot above or below the annual mean stage, and extreme fluctuations of a temporary nature, due to wind and barometric pressure, of about 2 feet above or below mean lake level prevailing at the time. New work for completed project cost $24,851, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower half mile of river, used by the local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,847. Supervision and administration cost $346. The existing project was complete in 1938. Total costs at the end of FY were $240,542, of which $34,035 was for new work and $206,507 for maintenance. 45. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,815. Soil borings of navigation structures were performed at a cost of $9,231. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY removing approximately 23,098 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $78,391. Repairs to N & S Piers were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $70,726. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $21,304. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project at end of FY were $3,199,228, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $3,019,329 for maintenance. 46. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI Location. This harbor is on the east shore of Lake Michigan about 50 miles south of the Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Previous project. For details see page 1954 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1547 of Annual Report for 1931, and page 2024 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. Provides for a breakwater extending from shore 1,345 feet long of stone-filled timber crib, concrete capped, and rubblestone construction which protects the municipal pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is a municipal pier which is about 635 feet long plus several recreational craft piers. These installations satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations durng fiscal year. New Work: Funds in the amount of $5,600 were expended to complete an unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report for a Section 107 project. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,391. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by Hired Labor at a cost of $1,269. Existing project was completed in 1908. Total costs to end of FY were $667,650. 47. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,803. The contract awarded last FY for repair of East and West Breakwater is 92% complete at a cost this FY of $1,723,918. Engineering, design, value engineering, supervision and administration cost $134,575. Contributed Funds expended in the amount of $606 represents financial close-out for the dredging contract completed in FY 85. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total costs to end of FY were $5,706,961, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $3,064,377 for maintenance. 48. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of Au Sable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A letter report for an additional breakwater was prepared this FY, at a cost of $50,753. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,857. Contract awarded last FY for breakwater access was completed this FY at a cost of $466,864. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $52,647. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $2,957,054, of which $1,179,087 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,777,967 for maintenance. 49. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,285. Safety maintenance and repairs to North and South Piers and Revetments were performed by the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $99,997. Supervision and administration cost $5,205. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $1,806,536. 50. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions.' (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,676. Inspection and reports under Section 111 mitigation were performed at a cost of $6,444. A contract for beach nourishment awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $174,660. Supervision and inspection of this contract cost $4,748. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $4,231,981 (includes $2,120,593 contributed funds). 51. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,950. Minor repairs to navigation structures by hired labor were performed at a cost of $1,693. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made in prior year costs for structure repairs. Supervision and administration cost $709. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total costs to end of FY were $6,426,652, of which $4,017,709 was for new work, and $2,408,943 for maintenance. 52. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,060. An adjustment of -$48,944 was made on a contract awarded and completed last FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $263. Existing project is complete except channel between piers and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977 under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Piers are in good condition. At end of FY controlling depth was 12 feet in lake approach, 10 feet between piers in northerly portion of turning basin, and 8 feet in easterly inner channel. Lands owned by the United States total 7.80 acres. Total costs to end of FY are $855,663. 53. RACINE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Milwaukee, WI, and about 64 miles north of Chicago, IL, (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14925.) Previous project. See page 1389 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. 31-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 For detailed description see page 1235, Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $777,775, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and exclusive of inner 300 linear feet of pile pier and 450 linear feet of rubblemound originally part of south breakwater but no longer considered necessary. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Authorization for the unconstructed Section 107 small boat harbor within the existing harbor was withdrawn by the Office of the Chief of Engineers on Aug. 25, 1986, at the request of the local sponsor. In addition, the entire Federal commercial navigation project was deauthorized by Public Law 99-315, dated May 21, 1986, which authorized transfer of title, without consideration to any project facilities constructed by the United States, to Racine County, WI. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five wharves used for handling coal, limestone, petroleum products, and fish. City provided a public wharf. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,302. Supervision and administration cost $2,018. Engineering, design, supervision and administration for Section 111 were performed at a cost of $8,338. Existing project was substantially completed in 1946. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection was completed in November 1918. Removal of old north pier was completed in 1913. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection and removal of old south pier were commenced in June 1916 and completed in December 1924. Removal of outer shoals, widening and deepening channels through outer basin to existing project depth and width, and dredging of river channel began in July and was completed in November 1946. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $9,583,688, of which $1,332,315 was for new work and $6,997,728 for maintenance, and $1,253,645 for rehabilitation. 54. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of City of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation chanel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958 is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $98,835. An adjustment was made for the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY in the amount of -$158,863 and -270 cubic yards. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging and approximately 59,357 cubic yards of shoal material removed at a cost of $523,642. Maintenance of disposal area by hired labor cost $4,472. Engineering and design for repair of Grassy Island was completed at a cost of $33,158. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $48,512. A contract for repair to Confined Disposal Facility at Grassy Island was awarded late in the FY in the amount of $1,592,100. No work was performed this FY. A contract was awarded for construction of a Wetland Marsh under Section 150 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1967. The Rouge River portion of this contract is complete at a cost of $100,000. Supervision and administration for this contract cost $44,833. Supervision and administration for dike disposal program cost $329. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $30,908,173, of which $675,251 was for new work and $30,232,922 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 55. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 31-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $308,316. An adjustment of $942 was made to the contract for dredging completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging the Bay Section was awarded in the amount of $847,000. Approximately 37% is complete at a cost of $313,389, removing approximately 99,000 cubic yards of material. Maintenance of Disposal Area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,939. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $48,784. Engineering and design for construction of a diked disposal area for upper Saginaw was continued at a cost of $207,953. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $66,829,119, of which $14,930,727 was for new work and $51,898,392 for maintenance. 56. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Tables 31-B and 31-C for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946 provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel. Estimated cost (1985) is $860,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $168,101. Environmental studies in connection with the extended navigation season cost $150,562. Location and removal of obstructions cost $524,096. Real estate activities cost $20,999. Minor maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,320. An adjustment of -$3,927 was made to prior year cost for maintenance dredging peformed by the U.S. Hopper Dredge MARKHAM. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $2,807. Existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $34,019,134, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $14,805,888 for maintenance. 57. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88th Congress declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety and environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $66,594. Repairs to North Revetment and N. and S. Piers were performed using the cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $116,600. Hired labor cost for maintenance of disposal area was $3,137. An adjustment of -$4,495 was made to the contract for dredging completed last FY. A contract awarded last FY for dredging inner harbor areas was completed at a cost of $2,798. A contract was awarded and completed for dredging the outer harbor removing 17,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $118,149. A second contract was awarded for dredging the inner 31-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 harbor and maintenance and repair of the disposal facility, removing approximately 20,814 cubic yards of material at a cost of $83,259. Cost for repair and maintenance was $111,745. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $93,434. Engineering and design for a disposal facility for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $14,594. Under the Section 111 program, one contract for mitigation of shore damage was awarded and completed at a cost of $529,801. Another contract for beach nourishment was awarded in the amount of $298,450. No work was performed this FY. Monitoring, surveys, engineering, supervision and administration cost $103,194. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $14,234,079, of which $1,301,372 was for new work, $11,970,491 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 58. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 31-D. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 577.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1973) cost for new work is $164,630. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and Village of Detour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operation, maintenance and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, is out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 278 days from October 1, 1985 through September 30, 1986. During that period, a total of 8,051 vessels, aggregating 68,917,500 short tons of freight and 174,823 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe, and Davis Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks for this FY was $5,586,448 which included $92,180 for extended season operation and maintenance and $842,635 for the modernization of the Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained at a cost of $627,589 during the FY less a deduction of $32,128 for interdepartmental electricity sold. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were maintained, condition surveyings, operation studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $692,503 which included a custodial, snow removal, and grounds upkeep contract for $203,174. Environmental studies were made at a cost of $40,861. Security measures were performed at a cost of $491,865 which included a service contract for $467,658. Janitorial service of the facilities was done by contract at a cost of $41,187. A study on winter and extended navigation season, ice measurements, and weather monitoring was performed at a cost of $807,309. The Soo Harbor ice boom was installed and removed at a cost of $55,005. Work was done on the Compensating Gates at a cost of $5,407. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor with U.S. Derrickboats NICOLET and HARVEY at a cost of $1,218,614 including engineering and design. A total of $72,515 has been expended this year in the procurement of an electronic survey sweeping system. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms were maintained at a cost of $154,053 which included a janitorial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $20,917, and the purchase of Guide uniforms at the Information Center at a cost of $707. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Information Center numbered 663,000. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the 31-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT locks numbered 528,820. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park numbered 719,200. A grand total of 894,023 people visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 86 amounted to $9,761,728. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total costs to end of FY were $160,657,070 for new work and $176,024,657 for maintenance, for a grand total of $336,681,727. 59. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to Village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At Village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,170. Repairs to the North Pier were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $54,045. Minor safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,283. Engineering and design for repair to the North and South piers and revetments was continued at a cost of $22,495. Supervision and administration cost $2,153. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of FY were $3,366,657, of which $364,527 was for new work and $3,002,130 for maintenance. 60. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,511. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $9,587. The project was fully completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. A detailed project report is being prepared to develop an acceptable plan for mitigation measures. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $1,559,657. (Includes $50,193 Contributed Funds.) 61. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New Work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $49,528. Real estate activities cost $19,998. Repairs to S. Pier were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $114,650. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $94,060 removing 12,026 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $50,022. Engineering and design for revetment repair cost $1,343. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging clean material cost $5,797. Engineering and design for dike disposal site selection was performed at a cost of $28,104. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility was performed at a cost of $9,231. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Costs of existing project are $5,717,966 for maintenance, $609,028 for rehabilitation, and $1,136,088 for new work; a total of $7,463,082. 31-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 62. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,230. Minor structure repairs were performed at a cost of $7,990. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Piers were performed at a cost of $59,172. Supervision and administration cost $188. Condition surveys, environmental studies and monitoring in conjunction with Section 111 were performed at a cost of $43,838. The contract awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $600,210. Supervision and administration cost $25,268. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively, in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized, which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to the end of FY were $7,258,842, of which $797,193 was for new work, $4,642,340 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 63. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in City of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from City of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $67,046. Breakwater repairs were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $119,856. An adjustment of -$20,000 was made to prior year costs for structure repairs. A contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $129,161 removing approximately 18,036 cubic yards of material this FY. Engineering and design for site selection of a disposal facility for dredged material cost $29,805. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $21,063. Site selection of a disposal facility cost $11,953. Total cost of existing project is $1,059,722 for new work, $7,405,099 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation: a total of $9,349,720. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 64. TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northeasterly portion of Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, adjacent to Tawas, Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater with four interconnected sections with an aggregate length of 1,750 feet with provisions for recreational fishing. A defined entrance channel and anchorage area are provided for, even though no dredging is required. Depths to 12 feet in the entrance and 10 feet in the anchorage area are presently available. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Federal cost was $1,120,980, excluding $1,120,980 contributed by local interests for a total cost of $2,241,960. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army on May 18, 1976, and have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Local interest work activities were completed in a previous FY and financial close-out of the project was accomplished this FY at a cost of $3,611. Surplus non-Federal contributed funds were returned to the sponsor this FY in the amount of $10,323. Maintenance: Conditon surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,735. Construction of breakwaters was initiated on April 21, 1977, and was completed on November 6, 1977. 65. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. 31-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,657. Engineering and design for Revetment repairs, supervision and administration cost $3,360. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along east side of lakeward portion of entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total costs of existing project were $360,320 for new work, $6,561,381 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation, for a total of $6,979,758. 66. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across lake, at Village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental and safety studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,918. Repairs to the East and West Piers were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $70,387. Minor safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $684. Engineering and design for major structure repairs to the North and South Piers was continued at a cost of $16,368. Supervision and administration cost $1,891. Under the Section 111 program, the contract awarded last FY for mitigation of shore damage was completed at a cost of $32,300. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for Beach Nourishment at a cost of $361,000. Surveys, engineering, supervision and administration cost $35,811. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally good condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost to end of FY is $3,255,542, of which $457,563 was for new work and $2,797,979 for maintenance. 67. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 31-F. 68. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 31-G. 69. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Expanded reconnaissance studies were continued for Douglas County, WI ($8,090) and completed for Two Harbors, MN ($1,054). Detailed project studies were terminated for Bayfield, WI ($12,591) because the project had a B/C ratio less than unity without recreational benefits, and for Kenosha, WI ($8,077) due to lack of local interest. An unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed for Petoskey, MI ($5,600). Financial close-out was accomplished on Harrisville Harbor, MI ($12,281). Beach Erosion Control 70. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Beach erosion control projects are authorized at Berrien County Shore (St. Joseph) MI, and the Shore of Manitowoc County, WI. For last full report see Annual Report for 1963 (Berrien County). Both projects are in the inactive category. 71. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit public services. (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended.) Barkers Island, WI -A contract for erosion protection of Marina Drive and a high pressure gas line was completed at a cost of $12,512. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $11,504. Total FY 86 costs were $24,016. Bayshore Drive, N. Shoemaker Road, WI - Preparation of the O&M Manual was completed and financial close-out of the project was initiated. Costs for FY 86 were $5,537. Bridgeport Charter Township, MI - A contract for streambank 31-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 erosion protection of the Fayette Street bridge was awarded in late September 1986. No work was performed this FY. Preparation of plans and specifications and advertisement and award costs in FY 86 were $32,639. Charlevoix Harbor, MI - Financial close-out of the project was completed at a cost of $17 Federal and $3,461 non-Federal. Elkhart River, Elkhart, IN - Preparation of the O&M Manual was completed and financial close-out of the project was initiated. Costs for FY 86 were -$1,101. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Grand Haven, MI - A contract for shoreline erosion protection of Harbor Drive was awarded in August 1986 and initiated in September 1986. Approximately 22 percent of the work was completed at a cost of $60,000. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $38,713. Total FY 86 costs were $98,713. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Port Washington, WI - The contract for shoreline erosion protection of the Water Filtration Plant Intake System, which was awarded in FY 85, was initiated and completed at a cost of $194,000 Federal and $250,481 non-Federal. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $8,248 Federal and $29,119 non-Federal. Total FY 86 costs wee $202,248 Federal and $279,600 non-Federal. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Warren Dunes State Park, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed at a cost of $7,500. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Cudahy, WI - A contract for erosion protection for the City's electric sub-station and pump house was awarded in late September 1986. No work was performed this FY. Reimbursement of the Appraisal Report, preparation of plans and specifications, and advertisement and award costs in FY 86 were $26,961. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Cleveland, WI -A contract for erosion protection for the City's waste water treatment plant was awarded in late September 1986. No work was performed this FY. Reimbursement of the Appraisal Report, preparation of plans and specifications, and advertisement and award costs in FY 86 were $33,354. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Lake Shore Drive, Michiana, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed at a cost of $6,500. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Manitowoc-Two Rivers, WI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed at a cost of $7,500. Manistee, MI - The previously completed contract for shoreline erosion protection of Lakeshore Road was modified to provide an additional 20 feet of bank protection work to prevent possible undermining and failure of the completed protection work and all work was completed at a cost of $25,997. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $5,250. Total FY 86 costs were $31,247. Zoological Gardens, Racine, WI - Financial close-out of the project was completed. Costs for FY 86 were $2,267 Federal and $3,885 non-Federal. 72. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. All work was suspended on the Escanaba and Ontonagon, MI projects because the projects lacked economic justification when recreation benefits were excluded. FY 86 costs were $1,528 for Escanaba, MI and $13,292 for Ontonagon, MI. 73. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Expanded Reconnaissance Report efforts were continued on Algoma, WI ($6,898), Marinette, WI ($15,489) and Sturgeon Bay, WI ($16,719). Detailed project study efforts were terminated at Saxon, WI when the project lacked economic justification when recreational benefits were excluded ($476). Coordination efforts continued on Presque Isle Harbor, MI (-$290). Flood Control 74. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI Location. River drains an irregularly shaped area of about 220 square miles in Bay, Gladwin, Midland, and Saginaw Counties in east-central Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay 2 miles northwest of Saginaw River. (See Geological Survey Bay City quadrangle and NOAA Nautical Charts 14867 and 14863.) Existing project. Provides for deepening about 1.8 miles of river channel between the river mouth and Euclid Street Bridge; altering Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge by addition of two 45.9-foot spans; protecting by riprapping the channel bottom through Euclid Street Bridge, existing piers at Henry Street Bridge and Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge; and a number of utility relocations. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, supervision and administration cost $287. An adjustment of -$747 was made to close-out a contract. 75. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel. (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867) Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) for construction of $1,448,000 for Middle and South Branches; provided local interests contribute in cash 31-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 42 percent of first cost of major drainage project on Middle Branch, and 38 percent of first cost of major drainage project on South Branch, exclusive of cost of rights-of-way and other work required as local cooperation, and give assurances satisfactory to Secretary of the Army they will construct and maintain local drainage work required to fully and effectively utilize improvements to be provided under the Federal projects; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction, floodwalls, modification of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimatd U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-of-ways (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $48,000 for construction; provided local interests modify spillway of mill dam at Corunna at their own expense, substantially in accordance with plan of District Engineer and subject to approval of Chief of Engineers, or in lieu thereof, contribute to the United States actual cost of modification to be performed by the United States; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1961) of $425,000 for construction; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on December 15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal, and a non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineeers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-ofway, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by City of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982 declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Shiawassee: Work on preparing a General Design Memorandum, initiated in FY 83, continued in FY 86. Total cost for Shiawassee this FY is $2,937. Flint: Investigation of claims for contract completed in FY 80 was continued at a cost of $50,941. Vasser: Work on preparing a General Design Memorandum, initiated in FY 83, continued in FY 86. Total cost for Vassar this FY is $3,459. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. Total costs for this project in FY 86 were $57,336. 76. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through Village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for Village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,224. 77. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The listed projects were inspected during this period. Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI; Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, MI; Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI; Flint, Flint River, MI; Frankenmuth, Cass River, MI; Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, MI; Red Run, Clinton River, MI; Estral Beach, Lake Erie, MI; Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, IN; Rouge River, MI; Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI. Fiscal year costs were $136,008. Total costs to end of FY year were $1,158,677. 78. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 31-H. 79. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and P.L. 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). 1. In late 1985 and throughout 1986 the potential for flooding along the Great Lakes shorelines, particulary on Lake Superior, Lakes Michigan-Huron, Lake Erie and the Connecting Channels of the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, and the Detroit River continued and even increased as water levels set new record highs month after month for the past year. The conditions for sustaining these perilous water levels worsened in September 1986 as extremely heavy rainfall on the Great Lakes Basin caused extensive flooding on rivers tributary to these lakes. Throughout this period NCE staff provided technical assistance, flood fighting equipment, and materials (787,000 sandbags and 25 pumps) to state and local entities to mitigate local storm events. a. October 1, 1985 - September 30, 1986: Implementation of PL 84-99 Advance Measures flood protection program continued for Great Lakes shoreline communities in response to record lake levels. Six flood protection projects have been completed at a cost of $5,403,450. A seventh has been approved pending completion of local cooperation agreements. Eighteen other communities were evaluated or reevaluated during this period for eligibility under Advance Measures. Costs incurred for Advance Measures letter reports: $98,029. b. (1) The Rehabilitation Levee Project under PL 84-99 at Fort Wayne, Indiana, started in September 1985, was completed in April 1986 at a cost of approximately $290,000. (2) Damage surveys and a Rehabilitation Letter Report were completed for the Corps-constructed, locally operated Saginaw River Basin Flood Control Project at Flint, Michigan. Damages to this project were sustained from the flash floods of Sep. 6-9. 1985. The Letter Report was approved by higher authority and the District initiated plans and specs for the rehab work. However, further work on the project was terminated because of a lack of response from the City of Flint to execute an Assurance Agreement with the U.S. Government. Study and design costs to date: $24,164. (3) A final determination was made that damaged agricultural levees (private) along the lower Flint River did not qualify for assistance through Corps authorities. These levees had been washed out in many places as a result of the Sep. 6-9, 85 floods. c. The Detroit District experienced the following significant flood events during the period October 1, 1985 through September 30, 1986: (1) December 28, 1985 - April 18, 1986: During this period almost continuous record-high water levels from the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, Detroit River and Lake Erie surged onto shoreline community developments as a result of ice jamming or high winds. Major flooding occurred in St. Clair County, Michigan, with minor but frequent events in Monroe, Wayne, and Macomb Counties. Evacuations were necessary at various times, particularly along the lower reaches of the St. Clair River. U.S. Coast Guard assistance was rendered on numerous occasions to break-up the ice pack and relieve water retardation. Damages were largely confined to basement and first floor of residential homes, flooded roads, gas and water main ruptures, and interrupted telephone service. No disaster declaration was issued. Incurred costs for Corps flood-fight actions: $61,077. (2) August 6, 1986: A severe rain storm hit the Milwaukee, Wisonsin metropolitan area, breaking previous rainfall records for a 24-hour period. A maximum 6.8 inches of rain occurred in a period from 12 a.m. to 8:45 p.m. Flash flooding occurred as streets became rivers and water rapidly collected several feet deep in low areas causing streets and highways, including 1-94, to become impassable. Sanitary sewer backup caused many basements to flood. The City of Milwaukee reported 10,000 basements affected, causing damages from collapsed foundation walls to content damage. Two deaths were reported as a result of flooding. The Milwaukee Airport suffered $2 million in damage and was forced to close because of electrical damage to operational equipment. Overall damage is estimated at $5.9 million. A Presidential Disaster was declared. Local rivers and creeks reached flood frequencies rated as great as 500-year. Corps aid was not requested due to the flash-flood nature of this event and the District EOC was not activated. Division emergency staff represented the District on the Hazard Mitigation Team. An Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team Report was issued on August 29. (3) September 11-30, 1986: Flooding in Central Michigan and Eastern Wisconsin caused by record rainfalls of 8 to 13 inches in 24 hours inundated a wide area (160 miles long x 60 miles wide) across central Michigan from Lake Michigan to Lake Huron. Lesser amounts of rainfall from the same storm system caused flooding in several eastern counties in Wisconsin between Milwaukee and Green Bay. Precipitation occurred for 26 straight days in the Michigan flood area, reaching September totals as much as 19 inches. Record flood stages were experienced in the following Michigan rivers: Cass, Pine, Tittabawassee, Chippewa, Rogue, Flat, Muskegon, Pere Marquette, and Little Muskegon. Because of the widespread nature of the storms, numerous smaller ungaged streams also experienced flooding which were likely record stages. Some areas, i.e., the Cities of Midland and Vassar, Michigan, experienced flood stages which were above what had 31-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT been considered to be the 500-year event. Eleven dams failed and nineteen others were threatened with failure. Overall, ten deaths were attributed to actual drownings or flood related conditions. A Presidential Disaster was declared for both Michigan (28 Counties) and Wisconsin (5 Counties), to provide Federal assistance to alleviate flood damage which approached $400 million in Michigan and $7 million in Wisconsin. The Detroit District mobilized a total of 56 persons for this event. The District EOC was activated during this period, and although Corps contracting assistance for flood-fighting efforts was not required, the District was active furnishing flood-fight materials: 493,400 sandbags, 199 poly rolls and 16 pumps. Corps personnel were not requested to assist FEMA in PL 93-288 actions except for service on the Hazard Mitigation Team. Incurred costs for Corps flood-fight support actions during this event: $320,662. d. Minor flood problems were experienced during the winter months of 1986 as a result of ice jamming on the Fox River, Outagamie County, and Oconto River, Oconto County, Wisconsin; Sturgeon River, Cheboygan County and River Raisin, Monroe County, Michigan. 2. A report was prepared for Congress, in response to an amendment to the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1986, directing the Secretary of the Army to develop emergency contingency plans in consultation with the states involved to prevent near-term flooding along the Great Lakes. The Detroit District was tasked as the lead in preparation of this "Contingency Plan Report" which was completed in August 1986. Costs incurred for preparation and coordination of this report: $41,040. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. The contract for flood damage reduction at Paw Paw Lake, MI, which was awarded in FY 85, was initiated in October 1985. Approximately 96 percent of the work was completed at a cost of $2,777,125. The Detailed Project Report was continued on the Ontonagon, MI project ($64,377), and a Reconnaissance Report was completed and the appraisal report reimbursement was received for Judy Creek, IN ($67,457). A negative appraisal report was completed and funds reimbursed for Rouge River, Farmington Hills, MI ($7,500). Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Reimbursement was received for the favorable appraisal report for LaGrange County, IN ($7,495). Preparation of the O&M Manual was continued and reimbursement was received for the appraisal report for Maple River, MI ($10,904). Aquatic Plant Control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). An aquatic plant control reconnaissance study was completed for Houghton Lake and Lake St. Helen within Roscommon County, MI. Funds in the amount of $979 were expended in FY 1986. 80. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field Operations. The following field operations, which were complemented by office activities in support of basic missions, were conducted during the current period: In support of the development and calibration of Detroit District mathematical models of the Connecting Channels, soundings and discharge measurements were conducted on the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers. Discharge measurements were made in the Welland Canal and analyzed by the Water Survey of Canada supported by District personnel. Additional field measurements are scheduled on the St. Lawrence, Niagara, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers and on the Ogoki Diversion during FY 87. During the winter months, the District monitors the presence of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. Water levels are monitored at key gages in these rivers for continuous updating of hydrographs for detection of possible ice jams and associated potential for flooding. This provides advance warning to area residents and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plans). This monitoring activity utilizes satellite data relay technology which provides water level data in the District Office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the spring and fall semi-annual appearances of the International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Washington, D.C. and Quebec City, Quebec, respectively. As a result of the record high lake levels, changed economic conditions and improved analytical techniques, the Governments of the United States and Canada issued the IJC a Reference, on August 1, 1986, requesting a new Great Lakes level regulation study. The IJC will investigate appropriate methods to alleviate problems associated with fluctuating water levels and to assess the viability of further lake level regulation. Once the studies are complete, the governments should be in a better position to make a determination regarding control of lake levels over the long term. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under Plan 1977, the currently approved operating rule. On April 25, 1985, the International Joint Commission directed the Board to deviate from Plan 1977 and to implement a flow reduction from Lake Superior beginning in May. This action was intended to alleviate high water conditions on Lakes Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and Erie, each of which experienced record high water levels during the spring. In response to this directive, the Board authorized flow reductions from May through August, amounting to an accumulation of 118,000 cfs-months. From September through November 1985, due to above normal precipitation causing a continuing rise in the water level of Lake Superior, several increases in the Lake Superior outflow were 31-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 made, with an all-time record high outflow of 132,000 cfs being discharged during part of October and all of November. The outflow was reduced to approximately 85,000 cfs beginning in mid-December, the winter maximum according to Plan 1977. On March 19, 1986, the UIC directed the Board to reduce the outflow from Lake Superior to that specified by Plan 1977, 82,000 cfs. By letter of April 23, 1986, the IJC informed the Board that, until further notice, the monthly outflows from Lake Superior be determined by Plan 1977 and that the amount of water remaining in storage as a result of the Commission's emergency actions (30,000 cfs-months), be retained on Lake Superior. On several occasions between late July and late September 1986, it was necessary to reduce the Lake Superior outflow for short periods to offset potential flooding in the Sault Ste. Marie Harbor. In order to permit a much quicker response time in effecting flow changes during such conditions, a portion of the outflow which normally would have been discharged through the Compensating Works was discharged through the U.S. navigation locks. The Board continues to closely monitor lake levels and will advise the Commission if and when additional flow changes are warranted. b. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The Chief of the Lake Hydrology Section of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Under the auspices of the International Niagara Committee, the Detroit District computes, coordinates and publishes, with Canada, the monthly flows in the Niagara River. The District also provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to the Board and Committee. The District is involved with the verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. As part of the on-going program to periodically verify the stage-discharge relationship for these gages, discharge measurements are scheduled in the Cableway Section in early FY 87. In FY 88, a further series of measurements are scheduled at the Cableway Section for verification of the Ashland Avenue Rating Curve. Also during FY 88, measurements are planned at the American Falls Channel Section to check the amount of flow over the American Falls. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District supported the Buffalo District in its activities. In early FY 87, the Detroit District plans to conduct an intensive flow measurement program in various reaches of the St. Lawrence River to be used as input to existing mathematical models of the river and also for proposed physical models. This effort is required to assist the Board in making various regulatory decisions during periods of high flow in the St. Lawrence River. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The IJC submitted its recommendations, based on the Board's report and subsequent public hearings, to the governments of the United States and Canada, in a report dated January 1985. A former Detroit District Engineer was Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Until such time as the Board is either dissolved or continued, certain personnel within the District continue to hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. e. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. The former Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch was U.S. Chairman of this Board. The Chief of the Lake Hydrology Section remains the Secretary to the U.S. Section of this Board, as well as a member on the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board completed its study and provided a report of its findings and recommendations to the Commission in December 1984. In January 1985, the IJC informed the governments of the United States and Canada of the findings of the Board. Furthermore, the Commission recommended that a committee be established to provide an international mechanism for institutional coordination between the operational Boards of the UC and agencies making studies, gathering and providing data on the Great Lakes System. This Board would assume the functions of the "Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data." Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrology Data. The Chief of the Lake Hydrology Section of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hyrdology Branch is the U.S. Secretary to this committee, as well as a member of its subcommittees. Operations continued pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. Coordinating Committee reports being worked on in the District include one which documents the discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1900-1978. Another report being worked on documents the flow in the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers, 1900-1985. Through the auspices of the Coordinating Committee, the Corps of Engineers by 1983, had provided funds to Canada, in the amount of $215,000, to aid in completion of precise leveling in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. This survey, as well as similar surveys conducted in the U.S. by NOAA, are part of a program to update the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). The new IGLD will evolve around the epic year 1980 and is expected to be published in FY 87-88. The Committee is scheduled to meet in Detroit in early FY 87. NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System. In FY 86, the District began implementation of the Great Lakes Water Control Data System, based upon a Harris-800 minicomputer and automated gaging stations. The Computer collects data from the District's data collection platforms (DCP's), from dedicated lines to the National Weather Service's telecommunication network, and from NOAA/NOS and Canadian water level computer systems. The District has 19 DCP's active and plans to install as many as 18 additional DCP's in FY 87. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has developed an automated computer mapping center based upon a stand-alone image processing system capable of processing satellite and aircraft derived data. Besides processing remotely sensed data, the system provides capabilities for generating multiparameter data bases for basin-wide hydrologic models, and for generating high-resolution graphics and drafting products. The computer mapping center is supporting the District's water control minicomputer in the monitoring of snowpack and ice conditions over the District's territory. 31-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, precipitation over water, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Several conceptual hydrologic models have been studied and are being calibrated for eventual use in future forecasts of lake levels and outflows. District personnel participated, for the fourth year, in a five-year program to assess water supplies on the Lake Superior basin through use of automated hydromet stations, airborne snow and soil moisture surveys, and satellite imagery. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding lake levels and long range still water forecasts to many interested parties, such as Congressmen, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, and concerned property owners. Explanation of the water levels was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with news media. The publication of an international (U.S. and Canada) forecast of Great Lakes water levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. In support of these forecasts and to assist in lake regulation, funds have been provided to the Department of Commerce for maintenance of eleven telemetric water level gages at selected sites throughout the Great Lakes to obtain near real-time data. Total costs under Surveillance and Northern Boundary Waters for FY 86 are $1,308,778. General Investigations 81. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $55,555 for the navigation study on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and Harbors, and $6,262 for the review of the authorized Fox River, WI project. Flood Damage Prevention studies cost $966,312. A feasibility study at Fort Wayne, IN was continued with preparation of a Draft Feasibility Report and DEIS, at a cost of $435,669 Federal funds and $60,730 non-Federal contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $284,125 were spent on the continuation of the Ecorse Creek Basin, Wayne County Flood Protection Study. In addition, $24,881 were expended in support of work efforts on a Summary Report dealing with the overall study authority for the Great Lakes, Particularly Lake Ontario and Lake Erie, of which Ecorse Creek Basin is an Interim study. Continuation of planning on the Saginaw River, MI Basin Study was accomplished at a cost of $221,637. 82. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING FY 86 costs for the continuation of planning and engineering for Monroe Harbor, MI, were $109,654. A Final Survey Report recommending structural modifications was completed in February 1980. The report recommendations are: to deepen the River Raisin portion of the project to 27 feet; to widen to 500 feet and deepen to 28 feet the entrance channel from Lake Erie; to provide a new turning basin able to accommodate 1,000 foot vessels; and to construct a confined disposal facility that would create a 700 acre marsh and provide shoreline protection behind the disposal facility. The Monroe Harbor Study was included in the FY 1984, 1985, and 1986 budgets under the category "Continuation of Planning and Engineering" for the purpose of collecting updated and detailed project data, reevaluating project channel dimensions and dredged material disposal requirements, reaffirming project economic and environmental feasibility, and preparing preliminary project design. Although no major change in the scope of the recommended plan is anticipated at this time, a reduction in recommended channel width and alternative dredge material disposal options were considered. Work in FY 86 consisted of the reevaluation of project economic and environmental feasibility conducted in FY 85 using updated benefits and cost data. The work consisted of the reevaluation of several alternative channel designs, detailed dredge and quantity estimates, and cost estimates for dredging and alternative disposal options. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of project users was also accomplished. A preliminary benefit-cost analysis was completed to update the economic evaluation of the project. 83. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA a. Coordination Studies with Other Agencies. These studies include Special Investigations, $34,000 (includes $15,000 for engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of the high lake levels of the Great Lakes); F.E.R.C., $2,000; Soil Conservation Service, $2,000; Planning Assistance to States (Section 22), $52,003; International Water Studies, $24,000; and Flood Plain Management Services, $154,211. A special hydrologic study to develop a regional flood frequency study for the Saginaw River Basin was initiated in FY 80, and the preparation of a final report was continued in FY 86. Costs for this project in FY 86 were $2,000. b. Flood Insurance Studies. Five Michigan Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 86. They were: Blissfield Village, Lenawee County; Hamlin Township, Mason County; Memphis City, Macomb County; Sault Ste. Marie City, Chippewa County; and Summit Township, Mason County. The studies were completed at a total cost of $109,446. The FY 86 costs were $6,495, $6,686, $8,319, $8,205, and $2,201, respectively. Flood Insurance Studies for Allen County, IN, and in Michigan for Bangor City, Van Buren County; Allegan City, Allegan County; AuGres City and AuGres Township, Arenac County; Clare City, Clare County; Manistee Township, Manistee County; Mayfield Township, Lapeer County; and Scio Township, Washtenaw County, will be completed in FY 87. The FY 86 costs associated with these studies were $27,815, $25,980, $11,054, $7,472, $10,642, $10,253, $6,103, $8,007, and $5,785, respectively. Work was initiated on Flood Insurance Studies for Novi City, Oakland County ($7,614); Three Rivers City, St. Joseph County ($18,276); and Lapeer Township, Lapeer County ($8,362) at a total FY 86 cost of $34,252. 31-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 In addition, costs thru FY 86, in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program, were $18,969. 31-32 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI 2. Ashland Harbor, WI 3. Big Suamico Harbor, WI 4. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) 5. Bolles Harbor, MI 6. Charlevoix Harbor, MI 7. Cheboygan Harbor, MI 8. Clinton River, MI 9. Cornucopia Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 0 153,800 62,514 291,000 117,000 155,998 67,248 263,563 144,618 88,000 238,000 27,552 115,000 77,490 246,921 15,687 129,603 - - - 8,757 - - - 8,757 11,000 11,000 81,000 11,000 10,912 65,033 -6,000 8,645 - 26,412 167,964 - 18,642 153,415 314,000 272,000 63,000 182,000 310,454 288,220 52,979 154,568 15,000 10,000 2,396 -16,528 12,608 10,585 2,798 -15,337 12,660 16,001 6,539 12,660 16,001 6,539 8,662 8,662 33,000 115,000 40,000 71,000 33,412 88,419 62,567 72,663 - - 118,086 - - 112,517 5,165 10,734 31-33 TABLE 31-A 00 1,255,362 1,254,817 1,695,645 1,695,645 2,610,348 2,610,348 20,243 20,243 175,362 175,362 383,350 383,350 578,423 577,013 426,413' 426,413' 1,070,841 1,048,522 1,190,550 1,190,550 180,623 180,623 5,053,900 5,014,240 1,129,396 1,129,396 504,236 504,236 860,730 860,241 549,7982 549,7982 1,023,459 1,023,459 461,200 454,701 462,653 462,653 831,125 831,125 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,19 86 10. Detour Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 11. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 12. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI 13. Fox River, WI 14. Frankfort Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost -864 -45,564 -30,626 280 280 -34,600 1,455 -975 5,975 1,478 4,266 1,478 3,900 8,675,000 3,894,546 9,438,900 8,530,302 4,546,281 8,932,080 3,752 4,118 3,446,800 4,109,489 - -14,000 25,000 0 3,610 5,459 22,256 1,383 - - - 242,280 - - - 203,000 1,354,910 1,354,910 1,204,436 1,204,436 9,776 9,776 76,877,3573 76,877,3573 72,593,824 72,520,849 41,400,694 41,397,610 242,280 203,000 - - - - 16,109,2584 - - - - 16,109,2584 2,348,000 2,431,000 3,377,400 1,973,700 35,382,270 1,886,071 2,687,668 3,493,775 1,945,302 35,245,639 - 2,410,000 4,830,000 - 2,291,677 4,773,781 1,556,249 1,556,249 7,240,000 7,065,458 - - - - 3,753,3345 - - - - 3,753,3345 1,780,000 1,782,000 1,018,000 1,063,000 36,895,6736 1,752,331 1,603,620 1,247,075 1,064,843 36,855,0616 - - - - 1,955,1597 - - - - 1,955,1597 -476,000 372,500 72,000 45,000 6,278,897 994,733 367,153 75,243 49,296 6,276,016 - - - - 274,776 - - - - 274,776 35,000 82,950 1,204,500 23 - 1,204,500 31-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project 15. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section III Section III Contributed Funds 16. Grand Marias Harbor, MN 17. Green Bay Harbor, WI 18. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Section III Section III 19. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 - - - - 1,283,4698 - - - - 1,283,4698 - - - - 175,000 - - - - 175,000 3,747,000 887,546 1,442,616 615,700 20,384,1559 1,024,174 3,551,803 1,497,972 615,944 20,380,6589 -- - - 813,613 - - - - 813,613 125,000 203,184 1,181,500 70,860 236,764 1,204,587 15,334 50,000 44,199 251 292,000 273,423 1,079,000 1,071,033 780,400 780,400 1,733,684 1,731,071 27,200 15,585 450,972 450,972 2,014,879 1,966,798 1,230,000 1,230,000 - - - 9,946,39510o,t - - - 9,946,39510,11 917,350 1,035,672 1,761,000 15,963,23512 961,792 1,069,546 1,604,864 15,774,48212 6,583,807 6,578,763 1,015,366 1,015,366 77,000 77,000 428,835 428,016 50,000 48,518 1,200,598 1,200,598 6,039,339 6,027,021 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 145,000 139,860 27,200 34,910 19,174 8,163 1,605,000 1,904,126 104,000 230,000 395,000 290,000 101,122 211,613 390,568 310,913 -10,000 10,243 -9,180 51,191 3,244 4,000 3,683 25,000 19,202 130,000 60,000 73,791 113,766 68,875 2,898 58,841 12,430 - 25,000 2,669 26,647 532,200 313,949 525,580 310,694 31-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,19 8 6 20. Harrisville Harbor. New Work MI Contributed Funds Section III Section III 21. Holland Harbor, MI Section III Section III 22. Inland Route, MI 23. Kenosha Harbor, WI 24. Kewaunee Harbor, WI Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 340,000 17,633 250,000 3,794 430,000 152,128 136,097 131,724 3,021,100 2,320,232 39,000 36,665 333,000 349,018 -44,000 5,330 100,000 90,467 100,000 79,795 -90,000 232,368 70,000 259,445 22,000 320,813 4,000 8,239 1,422,760 1,758,195 35,000 33,713 -15,000 -63,981 -32,516 24,215 6,401 3,376 13,000 11,137 571,720 934,563 558,000 421,857 -36,700 12,281 1,603 3,770 24,000 25,557 1,849,938 1,849,938 287,454 287,454 502,000 502,000 756,201 755,209 37,000 36,694 - 771,82713,14 - 771,827'13,14 - 621,000 - 621,000 507,000 12,406,712 484,876 12,380,306 694,000 1,460,200 828,919 1,455,354 - 502,452 - 502,452. 2,400 90,000 86,000 12,934 90,723 60,666 30,000 38,658 368,000 380,004 12,000 3,726 94,491 107,405 - - 6,000 - - 6,000 625,400 406,250 189,000 607,019 400,880 218,132 8,077 208,000 168,916 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,222'5 918,222's 2,231,888 2,201,833 404,300 404,300 988,96916,17 987,89716,17 2,960,86818 2,920,330'18 1,270,275 1,270,275 - 4,378,600 - 4,378,600 - 758,33319 - 758,33319 243,000 3,553,59120 225,007 3,535,31220 - 617,300 - 617,300 31-36 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 25. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 26. Knife River Harbor, MN 27. La Pointe Harbor, WI 28. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 29. Leland Harbor, MI 30. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section III Section 111 Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,961,461 747 2,961,461 - - - - 5,974,141 - - - - 5,974,141 410,000 309,000 410,000 681,000 11,551,68421 345,687 329,088 438,285 668,439 11,521,15921 101,000 70,000 72,000 241,000 78,172 90,863 70,506 220,193 1 24,638 23,808 824 37,432 1,654 32,110 - 9,974 - 9,669 13,551 11,572 3,651 8,973 296 2,400 491,000 466,734 412,945 412,945 291,174 291,174 130,874 130,874 88,385 88,385 - - - - 7,675,35722 - - - - 7,675,35722 346,000 745,400 297,000 262,600 7,155,08423 323,961 767,954 299,095 260,663 7,134,79223 - - - - 5,119,800 - - - - 5,119,800 189,000 236,466 66,600 100,000 177,087 251,778 62,264 104,735 - - 25,000 12,000 24,973 11,033 - 20,000 44,575 19,789 3,131 4,125 254,000 101,984 260,000 407,397 1,027,08924 1,027,08924 1,513,511 1,512,970 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 124,044 124,044 714,000 709,170 31-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 31. Little Lake Harbor, MI 32. Ludington Harbor, MI Section III Section III 33. Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 34. Mackinaw City Harbor, MI 35. Manistee Harbor, MI 36. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 129,000 165,283 229,458 263,000 106,875 135,253 256,986 279,129 549,500 726,766 564,366 544,182 427,900 420,772 - 710,540 - 692,796 600,47825 600,47825 2,768,515 2,760,015 - 7,912,20226 - 7,912,20226 - 620,000 - 620,000 329,000 8,406,56627 337,698 8,377,32727 - 357,913 - 357,913 -64,000 661,540 -46,931 660,865 - 22,274 - 22,023 - 27,525 - 16,852 4,946 15,619 229,085 229,085 105,004 105,004 93,744 93,493 136,28628 136,28628 76,061 76,061 - - - - 2,696,52229 - - - - 2,696,52229 190,000 474,300 29,000 816,000 5,154,73330 195,904 466,666 36,254 791,534 5,126,88730 - - - - 1,374,164 - - - - 1,374,164 250,000 342,112 381,800 799,140 753,000 297,937 10,000 22,154 9,206 1,883 309,690 763,277 -141,950 -137,174 -74,718 114,139 124,000 125,891 - 2,048,91431' - 2,048,91431 9,206 1,948,494 - 1,911,076 296,000 4,927,51532 300,389 4,901,28832 3,081,756 3,081,756 31-38 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 37. Marquette Harbor, New Work MI 38. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI Contributed Funds 39. Milwaukee Harbor, WI 40. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 41. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section III Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 477 987 73,192 73,577 22,448 21,556 204,384 204,324 1,282,893 1,282,893 1,807,281 1,806,329 465,757 465,757 - - - - 533,476"3 - - - - 533,47633 33,000 113,000 55,000 104,000 1,784,45434 33,898 35,520 123,282 109,403 1,778,02534 - --- 1,351,852 - - - - 1,351,852 46,000 47,000 110,000 -10,000 24,427 64,434 101,568 2,288 410,000 1,106,700 74,000 412,327 1,027,490 168,317 - - 2,010,000 - - 1,940,752 593,660 591,014 36,762 36,762 - 8,231,02435 - 8,231,02435 440,000 24,596,27436 399,452 24,552,52536 3,205,000 7,106,810 3,189,537 7,022,099 6,380,925 6,380,925 - - - - 987,34037 - - - - 987,34037 398,000 777,450 1,873,000 1,640,900 12,778,12037 380,264 656,686 1,936,061 1,700,939 12,743,69237 22,268,000 2,850,000 995,000 -17,000 38,621,900 19,021,218 6,152,561 1,024,457 -23,493 38,580,588 85,000 77,130 85,000 610 77,740 - - - - 2,912,11038 - - - - 2,912,11038 - - - - 105,000 - - - - 105,000 207,000 579,000 81,000 86,000 5,444,11539 209,364 574,185 90,592 89,926 5,442,55039 31-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 Section III 42. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 43. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 44. Pensaukee Harbor, WI 45. Pentwater Harbor, MI 46. Petoskey Harbor, MI 47. Point Lookout Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 40,000 33,785 3,800,000 74,251 20,000 16,028 -350,000 3,315,594 48,000 34,955 5,100,000 4,996,129 1,593,000 1,602,842 1,337,300 1,468,604 204,870 112,000 311,600 526,000 204,085 105,922 173,015 664,118 100,000 91,417 215,000 211,013 157,000 162,633 359,300 353,444 150,000 145,546 544,000 541,664 83,000 77,669 916,000 919,158 - - 13,193 - - 13,193 82,000 97,533 174,004 194,666 81,223 99,697 169,340 194,467 - - 5,600 - - 5,600 - 218,074 2,391 - 213,805 6,660 419,721 124,734 441,522 1,701,100 244,539 263,875 291,697 1,882,296 12,000 8,651 - -2,743 - 606 31-40 1,904,000 1,890,610 13,764,300 13,731,578 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 2,798,153 2,790,823 181,500 181,500 886,90340 874,46840 7,680,55341 7,668,44841' 21,000 21,000 34,035 34,035 206,507 206,507 179,899 179,899 3,025,255 3,019,329 123,839 123,839 543,811 543,811 2,642,584 2,642,584 2,938,190 2,933,520 121,600 121,600 9,257 9,257 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 48. Port Austin Harbor, MI 49. Portage Lake, MI 50. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section III Contributed Funds Section III 51. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 52. Port Wing Harbor, WI 53. Racine Harbor, WI Section III New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. 15,658 15,658 4,185 5,102 3,738 6,476 17,272 9,795 531,472 48,528 52,000 50,753 60,613 544,368 1,340 13,336 120,385 1,584 8,554 125,487 16,522 16,000 16,065 9,552 1,772 8,676 15,000 230,000 249,000 - 41,228 222,335 71,321 185,852 806 10,000 12,147 9,000 8,999 157,000 24,313 157,000 21,027 1,180,33442 1,179,08742 1,625,633 1,618,966 159,000 159,000 256,129 256,129 1,551,217 1,550,407 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 1,575,184 1,575,183 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 802,000 799,569 - 2,582,20443 - 2,582,20443 -12,936 2,413,44544 -9,650 2,413,44544 4,000 245,717 -47,476 4,001 236,862 -38,621 10,621 10,621 1,624,000 1,624,000 63,393 63,393 792,270 792,270 - 1,297,31545 - 1,297,31545 - 35,000 31-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30, 1 986 t - - - 35.000 Section III 54. Rouge River, MI. 55. Saginaw River, MI. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 56. St. Clair River, MI. 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI. Section III Section III Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 16,636 1166,,663366 95,011 22,083 93,011 24,083 35,000 20,000 51,000 26,698 28,178 43,920 12,362 2,944,88246 9,320 2,941,84046 - 1,253,645 - 1,253,645 2,000 8,338 3,948,754 3,948,754 108,000 107,134 - - - 675,25147 - - - - 675,25147 394,000 859,615 776,500 711,700 15,747,60348 675,053 835,802 836,762 694,589 15,715,89248 - - 10,000 - 14,523,823 -1,210 24,085 4,885 329 14,517,030 - - - - 14,917,12749 - - - - 14,917,12749 - - - - 13,600 - - - - 13,600 2,333,400 5,531,140 2,781,675 626,200 32,749,295 2,030,316 5,729,604 2,829,598 680,370 32,738,458 90,000 223,000 260,000 182,500 19,185,9000 89,284 184,873 256,689 207,953 19,159,93450 - - - - 19,213,246 - - - - 19,213,246 1,781,000 1,224,256 1,510,000 816,100 14,820,913 1,792,998 1,259,444 1,462,529 863,958 14,805,888 448,000 413,616 511,900 611,000 434,728 423,156 506,647 591,221 58,000 19,428 361,000 323,946 21,000 51,533 333,000 258,348 135,000 127,783 114,000 152,156 14,595 730,000 632,995 976,4855' 976,4855' 828,000 828,000 8,184,465 8,152,841 962,216 962,216 643,776 642,908 3,345,300 3,174,743 31-42 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 58. St. Marvs River, New Work 59. Saugatuck Harbor, MI and Kalamazoo River, MI 60. Saxon Harbor, WI Section III 61. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 62. South Haven Harbor, MI Section III Section III 63. Sturgeon Bay, WI & Lake MI Ship Canal, WI MI -m 8,818,256 8,329,035 10,006,700 9,221,000 10,323,209 8,973,402 - 160,657,07152 - 160,657,07052 9,704,800 176,567,108 9,761,729 176,011,557 13,100 13,100 Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - 364,52753 - - - 364,52753 -15,000 265,100 78,559 3,002,28654 19,969 249,974 95,146 3,002,13054 41,500 39,200 6,649 6,649 3,000 4,685 56,259 36,398 2,237 25,098 426,50755 426,50755 669,000 667,393 415,602 415,602 - - - - 1,136,08856 - - - - 1,136,08856 843,000 775,000 157,000 327,000 4,811,39257 167,298 1,449,627 124,641 363,502 4,810,23857 - - - - 609,028 - - - - 609,028 66,000 203,000 82,000 -15,000 907,792 71,290 200,475 68,476 9,231 907,728 121,881 100,849 - - - 452,42658 - - - 452,42658 - - - 532,000 - - - 532,000 -10,000 148,868 87,000 3,484,46659 15,372 133,324 84,580 3,466,30259 - - - 1,632,076 - - - 1,632,076 - 25,000 483,000 312,000 - 14,741 125,600 669,316 42,381 42,381 1,144,000 1,133,657 - 1,059,72260 - 1,059,72260 31-43 182,000 151,739 45,000 44,008 7,767 7,767 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,19 86 64. Tawas Bay Harbor, MI (Contributed Funds) 65. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 66. White Lake Harbor, MI Section III Section III 74. Kawkawlin River, MI 75. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 93,000 72,000 406,000 176,000 7,098,61561 105,873 68,069 234,819 346,931 7,093,98161 28,000 10,823 -9,000 37,000 - 9,057 25,485 11,953 - - - 3,700 831 - - 3,611 - - - -10,323 - - - -3,611 - - - 1,735 - - - 1,735 311,119 311,118 884,899 884,899 1,154,068 1,153,979 989,677 989,677 20,925 20,925 - - - - 360,32062 - - - - 360,32062 10,987 27,000 131,000 21,978 5,386,06663 10,987 26,890 119,914 21,017 5,373,90963 - - - - 1,187,472 - - - - 1,187,472 - - - - 58,057 - - - - 58,057 45,000 39,731 96,000 63,364 -5,300 - 1,678 - -20,000 193,000 13,691 189,917 - 262,000 - 214,040 - 250,000 - 234,889 7,271 1,855,000 658,400 180,000 1,523,178 957,427 108,667 98,000 98,248 389,000 429,111 -8,300 -460 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 2,158,463 2,154,828 651,000 643,151 241,700 241,700 - 24,553,359 57,336 24,502,236 - 173,000 - 172,997 31-44 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 Sept.30,1986 76. Sebewaing River, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 365,64264 Cost - - - 365,64264 Maint. Approp. 32,000 -10,500 17,000 9,000 391,644 Cost 9,533 11,411 7,332 16,224 388,644 80. Surveillance of New Work North Boundary Approp. - - - - 0 Waters Cost - - - 0 Maint. Approp. 1,165,000 1,234,000 1,596,000 1,330,000 40,224,33465 Cost 1,092,046 1,281,669 1,587,312 1,308,778 40,142,19465 'Includes $255,000 contributed funds. 2Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 contributed funds for existing projects. 3Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 4Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 5Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. 6Includes $89,309 for previous projects. 7Includes $31,709 contributed funds. 8Includes $311,329 for previous projects. 9Includes $13,437 for previous projects. '0 Includes $396,974 for previous projects. "Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 12Includes $8,918 for previous projects. "Includes $176,620 for new work, $127,598 for maintenance. 14Includes $35,705 contributed funds. 'SIncludes $148,000 contributed funds for existing project. '6Includes $453,839 for previous projects. "'Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. ' Includes $21,818 for previous projects. '9Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 20Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 21Includes $402,242 for previous projects 22Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 23Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 24Includes $354,139 contributed funds. 25Includes $57,670 contributed funds. 26lncludes $491,416 for previous projects. 27Includes $126,451 for previous projects. 28Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 29Includes $354,999 for previous projects. 30lncludes $150,910 for previous projects. 3Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 32Includes $54,288 for previous projects. 33Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "Includes $36,194 for previous projects. "Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 3Includes $459,305 for previous projects. "Includes contributed funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co., $125,000 and River Raisin Co., $41,667. 3Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 39Includes $446,183 for previous projects. 40Includes $284,802 for previous projects. 41Includes $113,326 for previous projects. 42Includes $172,100 contributed funds. 43Includes $188,495 for previous projects. 44Includes $15,123 for previous projects. 45Includes $427,240 for previous projects. 46Includes $79,537 for previous projects. 47Inlcudes $50,084 for previous projects. 48Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 49Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 50lncludes $1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419 emergency relief funds. "Includes $503,113 for previous projects. "2Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. 5Includes $90,232 for previous projects. "Includes $117,554 for previous projects. "Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. '6Includes $487,817 for previous projects. "Includes $87,131 for previous projects. "Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 59Includes $131,239 for previous projects. 60Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 6'Includes $219,730 for previous projects. 62Includes $212,857 for previous projects. 63Includes $33,113 for previous projects. 64Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 65Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 31-45 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISTLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 6, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 29, 1977 Jun. 2, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI. (See Section 2 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project.' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI (See Section 3 of Text) Channel from Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 4 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel sheet pile revetment. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 6 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) 181/2 foot channel. 81/2 foot channel. Turning Basin. 21-foot channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin, deepen to 21 feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 498, 74th, Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, p. 219 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Committe, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-46 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 3, 1969 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 maximum width of 180 feet, with 150 and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of east and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. DETOUR HARBOR, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10-foot channel, 8-foot deep access channel protected by 1,000-foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse lie shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works. Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower, (29-foot depth) Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 12 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess.. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess, and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 28, 19085 Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Jul. 16, 19526 Jul. 14, 19607 Oct. 4, 1961 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 19258 Jun.26, 19349 Jul. 3, 195810 Jun. 23, 1866" Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug.26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jun. 23, 1866 Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 13 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 14 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance Channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 15 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor Channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 16 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. GREEN BAY HARBOR WI (See Section 17 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands.' 2 H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong.,1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong.,3d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 184. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. 31-48 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 13, 1892 Inner channel. 12 Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21,1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19352 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters. 10-foot depth in harbor basin 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters. 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.' 2 Piers and Revetments.' 2 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 22 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 23 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater' 2. Extending breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1873, p. 292 H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committe Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19352, 14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1936's Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 7, 1974 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 24 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN (See Section 26 of Text) Dredging. Breakwater and modified channels. Construction of measures to correct the design deficiencies which results in unsatisfactory entrance and mooring conditions. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 28 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Point. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082 H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 686, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report for 1949. H. Doc. 463, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th. Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-50 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 17, 1966 Jan. 15, 1965 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 193517 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 30 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner Piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening between Breakwaters. MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Original Breakwater.30 500-foot extension to East Breakwater. MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Breakwater 430 feet long; slope protection for about 300 feet; entrance channel 10 feet deep with minimum width of 100 feet; protected anchorage and maneuver area 3.3 acres with depth 6 to 8 feet. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension.) Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present Project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 36 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream Construct 765-Foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemount bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' IH Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 11416 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951 H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.' 6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 646, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report 1867, p. 115 Annual Report 1891, p. 2678 H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun 1967 Detailed Project Report; Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act 31-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194518 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 183519 Jul. 3, 1920 Jul. 14, 193221 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 38 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 39 of Text) North pier.' 2 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.' 2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 40 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and Turning Basin. 20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act. of Jul. 3, 1930 MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. pts. 1 and,2, and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, P. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.) H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report 1872, p. 237 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbor Comm. Doc. 12, .72d Cong., 1st Sess. 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong. 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbor Comm. Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-52 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 2, 1882 1883 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul.13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Aug. 18, 1894 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 193523 Jul. 3, 195824 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 44 of Text) Construction of slab pier 2,500 feet long on the north side of the channel and dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep. Extending pier to 10-foot contour (2,700 feet) and dredging to 10 feet below datum. (Datum elevation 580.69 feet) Dredging entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) Breakwaters according to larger of two projects. Removal of north breakwater and extension of west breakwater if cost did not exceed $170,000 POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 47 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 feet deep portected by Piers and Revetments. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 51 of Text) North pier and south basin.' 2 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 52 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. No. 153, 42d Cong., 3d Sess. R & H Act Aug. 2, 1882 Modified H. Doc. No. 478, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1890, p. 2673 Annual Report 1895, p. 2819 Annual Report 1896, p. 2722 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106. Annual Report 1879, p. 163422 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. X3 79 H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83d Cong. 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 5, 1977 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352,26,27 Jul. 3, 19582 Oct. 23, 19622 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. RACINE HARBOR, WI (See Section 53 of Text) Breakwaters. Remove shoals lakeward of harbor entrance, enlarge 19-foot channel through outer basin and 19-foot channel in river. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin and in river. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 54 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter, and 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet.at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination' of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot Project above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada of Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. ST. JOSPEH HARBOR, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Interior Revetments. 28 Benton Harbor Canal. 28 Present Project dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1909, p. 1973. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 816, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 255, 78th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 25 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cng. 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162 Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. 31-54 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Present project dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of Channel above West Line of 9th St. Turning Basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel. 28 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. David Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Co. provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below Locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lake Superior and Huron are at their respective low-water datum. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Comm. Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, p. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. 31-55 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Apr. 7, 1966 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 60 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 61 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 62 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.' 2 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 63 of Text) Breakwaters. 12 Acquisition of the canal. TAWAS BAY, MI (See Section 64 of Text) 1,750 foot breakwater, 12 foot deep entrance Channel, 10-foot deep anchorage area. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 65 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.' 12 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 66 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present Project Depth of Channel. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI (See Section 74 of Text) Deepening River Channel, altering Railway Bridge, Riprapping portions of Channel bottom, and utility relocations. SAGINAW RIVER, MI FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 75 of Text) Floor Control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 76 of Text) Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 189, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate. 29 Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., Ist Sess.' 31-56 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935, 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5Administrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 'Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. '�Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. '2Completed under previous project. '3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 4Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 'SLatest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p. 2974. 16Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. "'Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. 'Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). 19Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 21War Department Appropriations Act. 22Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 23Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 24Deauthorized in 1977. 25Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 26Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 27This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 28 Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 29Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 30Project complete except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-57 TABLE 31-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Length Miles Used by Above Mean of from Upbound Water Level Channel Mouth or Down- Project Project at Father of bound Width Depth Point,Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 11 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle 1,2 Channel at Head of Detroit River Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstburg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal .30 38,800 32 44,500 25 Both Both Both 24,800 17 Both 12,200 12 Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down Both Both - - Both - - Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 14 Up. Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 200 800 800 600 21.0 571.3 28.5 571.5-570.9 28.5 570.9-570.3 28.5 28.5 569.8 569.8 450 27.7 569.8-568.6 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 29.0 29.0 28.5 568.6 568.6 568.6 - 28.5-29.53 568.6 - 29.5 568.6 600 600 6000 800 300 300 250-300 27.5 21.27.54 21.28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.9-569.7 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 ST. CLAIR RIVER MI (SEE SECTION 56 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russel Island Russel Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 Both 4,100 39 Both 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 5 Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 800 800 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 576.8-576.5 30.0 576.4-576.1 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 573.1-572.0 572.1-571.7 571.7 'This is a Side Channel. 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 Feet. 3Project Depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 27.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width 'Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 28.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. 6Project Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-58 1964 1964 1964 1962 1963 1964 1961 1961 1964 1962 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 TABLE 31-D DETROIT, MI DISTRICT ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 58 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064, 7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -9 $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,2248 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes Cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662, 919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. SExcludes cost of North Canal, $2,572, 611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 8Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separable from cost of locks. 31-59 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Com- Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete C DePere lock 2 DePere dam2 Little Kaukauna lock 2 Little Kaukauna dam2 Rapide Croche lock 2 Rapide Croche Dam 2 Kaukauna fifth lock 2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna third lock 2 Kaukauna second lock 2 Kaukauna first lock2 w Kaukauna Dam2 - Kaukauna guard lock Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock2 Little Chute first (guard) lock' Little Chute Dam2 Cedars lock 2 Cedars Dam 2 Appleton fourth lock 2 Appleton lower dam2 Appleton third lock 2 Appleton second lock2 Appleton first lock 2 Appleton upper dam Menasha lock 2 Menasha Dam2 7.1 DePere 7.2 DePere 13.0 DePere 13.1 DePere 19.2 Wrightstown 19.3 Wrightstown 22.8 Kaukauna 23.1 Kaukauna 23.3 Kaukauna 23.4 Kaukauna 23.6 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.4 Little Chute 25.4 Little Chute 26.4 Little Chute 26.5 Little Chute 26.6 Little Chute 27.3 Little Chute 27.4 Little Chute 30.7 Appleton 30.9 Appleton 31.3 Appleton 31.6 Appleton 31.9 Appleton 32.2 Appleton 37.0 Menasha 37.8 Menasha 6622 1 1 1 I 1 Actual :ost 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 $229,308 - - - - - Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1929 209,536 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay - Concrete 1938 362,427 S - - - - Clay and gravel Fixed3 4 Piers and concrete 1926 179,398 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock - Concrete 1934 228,738 - - - - - Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1930 118,975 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock - Composite 1898 13,3105 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 37,536 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 39,948 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1903 24,313 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 38,704 - - - - - Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1931 123,763 40.0 - - 9.4 - Rock - Stone masonry 1891 12,630 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock 35.4 - - 6.6 - Rock - - - - - Rock 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock - - - - - Rock 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock - - - - - Rock 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock - - - - - Rock 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay - - - - - Hardpan - Stone masonry - Stone masonry - Stone masonry - Stone masonry Fixed 3 4 Concrete - Stone masonry Fixed3 4 Concrete - Stone masonry Fixed3 4 Concrete - Stone masonry - Stone masonry - Stone masonry Fixed3 Concrete - Composite Fixed3 Concrete 1879 102,304 1879 1881 48,555 1904 7,8175 1932 82,554 1888 34,972 1933 84,973 1907 40,893 1934 73,903 1900 32,238 1901 22,940 1884 36,004 1940 151,558 1899 19,3265 1937 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 3Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. sPartially rebuilt. TABLE 31-E TABLE 31-F DETROIT, MI DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Algoma Harbor, WI Alpena Harbor, MI Au Sable Harbor, MI Bayfield Harbor, MI Bayport Harbor, MI Belle River, MI Big Bay Harbor, MI Black River (P.H.) MI Caseville Harbor, MI Grand Marais, MI Greilickville Harbor, MI (formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Grays Reef, MI Lac LaBelle Harbor, MI Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Manistique Harbor, MI Pine River, MI Presque Isle Harbor, MI Sebewaing River, MI St. James Harbor, MI Two Harbors, MN Whitefish Point, MI July 1986 June 1986 July 1986 June 1986 February 1986 April 1986 June 1986 July 1986 June 1986 April 1986 October 1985 June 1986 October 1985 September 1986 May 1986 April 1986 June 1986 June 1986 July 1986 October 1985 May 1986 31-61 TABLE 31-G REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report for Construction Maintenance Alpena Harbor, MI Algoma Harbor, WI Au Sable Harbor, MI Bayfield Harbor, WI Bayport Harbor, MI Belle River, MI Beaver Bay, MN Big Bay Harbor, MI Black River (Alcona Co), MI Black River (P.H.), MI Caseville Harbor, MI Cedar River Harbor, MI Chnls. in the Straits of Mackinac, MI Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Eagle Harbor, MI Forestville, MI Grand Marais Harbor, MI Grand Traverse Harbor, MI Grays Reef Passage, MI Greilickville Harbor, MI (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Lac La Belle Harbor, MI Les Cheneaux Islands Channels, MI Little Bay DeNoc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Lutsen Harbor, MN Manistique Harbor, MI Northport Harbor, MI Oconto Harbor, WI Pine River, MI Presque Isle Harbor, MI St. James, Beaver Island, MI St. Joseph River, MI Sebewaing River, MI Two Harbors, MN Washington Island, WI Whitefish Point, MI 'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 2Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 3Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 4Excludes $56,500 contributed funds. 5Includes $85,849 for previous projects and $349,921 contributed funds. 6Includes $12,008 for maintenance previous projects. 7Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. "Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 9Includes $84,569 for previous projects. '0Includes $8,161 for previous projects. "Excludes contributed funds of $7,500. '2Includes $48,404 National Industrial Recovery Act for new work funds. 31-62 1985 1981 1985 1979 1975 1980 1982 1984 1907 1985 1981 1982 1984 1959 1985 1969 1980 1985 1970 1976 1985 1980 1966 1982 1985 1985 1980 1985 1957 1975 1982 1984 1950 1981 337,394' 205,0102 209,7763 183,855 93,597 24,301 293,000 390,4334 830,1655 587,314 215,000 2,832,629 125,629 205,1647 1,055,871 266,037 190,521 366,579 269,270 399,478 332,832 357,000 1,299,3558 130,7549 13,649 1,252,192 49,17111 54,555 35,573 4,170,71012 62,838 771,639 920,222 913,660 2,474,814 75,759 54,417 73,503 2,818 1,014,671 509,4106 109,194 145,318 8.871 77,862 1,687,290 1,574,653 657,856 122,782 474,761 293,778 64,869 2,183,185 1,103,94110 32,675 804,838 55,388 19,185 2,289,433 1,905,193 67,084 224,659 TABLE 31-H DETROIT, MI DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Grand River, Grandville, MI' 1966 -- Grand River, Lansing, MI 1971 7,300 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI2 1975 4,471,235 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) MI 1975 421,466 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI3 1953 1,136,0084 Upper River Rouge, MIs 1968 7,935 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 3,823,000 River Rouge, MI 1981 31,960,332 'Awaiting Appropriation of Funds. 4Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 2Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. SPlanning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local 'Completed. cooperation. TABLE 31-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) Lansing, (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun. 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug. 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 22,000 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 O (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 O (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug. 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard 1977 Oct. 1978 0 0 Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) 31-63 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT * The district comprises northern Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of' western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary basins drainage from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of' Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio ............... 32-2 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. .............. 32-2 3. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y.................... 32-3 4. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y................. 32-3 5. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-3 6. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-4 7. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y .................. 32-5 8. Erie Harbor, Pa. .................... 32-5 9. Fairport Harbor, Ohio ................ 32-5 10. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio ................ 32-6 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y............ 32-6 12. Huron Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-6 13. Irondequoit Bay, N.Y ..... ............. 32-7 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y............ 32-7 15. Lorain Harbor, Ohio ..................... 32-7 16. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y............... 32-8 17. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y................. 32-9 18. Olcott Harbor, N.Y .................... 32-9 19. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y................ 32-9 20. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. .................. 32-10 21. Rocky River Harbor, Ohio .............. 32-10 22. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-10 23. Toledo Harbor, Ohio ..................... 32-10 24. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio .................. 32-11 25. Wilson Harbor, N.Y. ..................... 32-11 26. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .. .32-11 27. Other authorized navigation projects ..... 32-11 28. Navigation work under special authorization . .................. 32-11 Beach Erosion Control 29. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio ............ 32-12 30. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio .......... 32-12 31. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa..........32-13 32. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .......................... 32-14 33. Beach erosion work under special authorization ................... 32-14 Flood Control 34. Ellicott Creek, N.Y ...................... 32-14 35. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River .......................... 32-15 36. Ottawa, Ohio ..... ................. 32-15 37. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio ................ 32-15 38. Reno Beach- Howard Farms Area, Ohio...............32-15 39. Inspection of completed flood control projects ..................... 32-16 40. National Emergency Preparedness ....... 32-16 41. Other authorized flood control projects ........................ 32-16 42. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 32-16 Deauthorized projects 43. Deauthorized Projects .................... 32-17 General Investigations 44. Surveys .................................. 32-17 45. Collection and study of basic data ....... 32-17 46. Advance Engineering & Design..........32-17 47. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ........................ 32-17 32-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1297- 99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by city of Ashtabula and one is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $32,834. Contract for analysis of and dewatering sediments cost $37,265. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $4,500. Repairs to 50 l.f. of the west breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Tonawanda cost $167,050. Snagging and clearing to remove logs in lower river by government plant and hired labor cost $3,038. Engineering effort, to include economics study and continued environmental and water quality analyses, cost $80,805. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N.Y., to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N.Y., Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N.Y., and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see item 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging'of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interests for relocation of utilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY, on April 16, 1985, and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N.Y., and several marine service and supply, docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is priyate. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of an elevated concrete walkway with railing and three refuge platforms on Bird Island Pier, under cost-shared recreation development at completed projects, was initiated in June 1985 and cost $310,000 Federal funds and $159,998 non-Federal funds. Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 251 days and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs from January 4, .1986 through April 28, 1986. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $2,718,745 were distributed as follows: Operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $439,478; maintenance of grounds $32,504; miscellaneous inspection and condition sediment surveys, project supervision, real estate, and support of Water Control Center $81,690. Rehabilitation of the upper guard gates by U.S. derrickboats McCauley and Simonsen cost $45,002 and $365,901, respectively. Painting of upper guard gates, by contract, cost $54,131. Rehabilitation of the butterfly valves of gates, by contract, cost $31,102. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $74,910. Dredging in channel, by contract, cost $124,605 and removed an estimated 32-2 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 20,000 cy material. Repairs to Bird Island Pier (within project channel) by contract, initiated in June 1985, cost $1,343,284. Construction will repair approximately 6800 1.f. of existing pier and provide a concrete walkway and three refuge platforms (Code 713 work). Engineering effort in association with rehabilitation of gates and operation of locks cost $126,138. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on 15 December 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 are along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $288,994. Repairs to about 200 l.f. of south breakwater and 450 l.f. of confined disposal area by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $690,746. Removal of an estimated 130,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $651,196. Environmental testing at Times Beach, by contract, cost $75,025. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $6,540. Snagging and clearing in Buffalo River by Government plant and hired labor cost $35,897. Engineering costs for plans and specifications for dredging cost $16,235. 4. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Federal cost for new work was $4,797,821 (Oct. 1981). Non- Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529 (Oct. 1981). Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Expenditure of $157 was attributed to inhouse engineering effort. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys were conducted at a cost of $22,742. Removal of weather-beaten permanent markers within the channel, by contract, cost $16,298. Stream gage maintenance cost $10,000. 5. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99- 88). The commercial navigation portion of the overall project consists of: (a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted dredged material resulting from the project. This portion of the project is currently on hold due to the inability of the local sponsor to finance their share of the project costs. The recreational navigation portion of the overall project consists of bulkheading and other necessary repairs to Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $34,565,100 (Oct. 1985) exclusive of inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $5,250,000 is for 32-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $13,433,000 (Oct. 1985) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,230,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) is $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.&O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Items of local cooperation for the commercial navigation portion of the overall project authorized by PL 99-88 consist of: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance of the harbor improvements, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for the initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of transportation systems, storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities, and other relocations and alterations made necessary by the project; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels; (e) Provide, during the period of construction, a cost contribution equal to 25 percent of the estimated total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation; and (f) Repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of the project, an additional 0- 10 percent of the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation depending on the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas provided by local interests for the general navigation features of the project. Items of local cooperation have not been established for the recreational portion of the overall project. Terminal facilities. There are 65 piers and wharves. Fourteen are located in the outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River and 40 along the deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-one terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1981, Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of an Affirmation Report and Plans and Specifications for the commercial navigation portion of the overall project authorized by PL 99-88 and initiation of the Formulation Report for the recreational navigation portion of the project was conducted under the General Investigation Appropriation at a cost of $193,000. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, letter report on new confined disposal facility and economics report by Government plant and hired labor cost $468,591. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $70,820. Repairs to 125 1.f. of dolos structure at east end of east breakwater, 120 l.f. of east arrowhead and east breakwater, and 50 l.f. of west arrowhead by U.S. derrickboat Tonawanda cost $383,278. Repairs to approximately 50 l.f. of breached portion of east breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $122,960. Dike repairs by Government plant and hired labor cost $10,611. Removal of shoaled material: 221,758 cubic yards from Cuyahoga River, 85,899 cubic yards from the harbor and 35,898 cubic yards from upper Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $1,992,751. In-house engineering costs for preparation of plans and specifications on contract dredging were $30,376. Engineering during construction of major rehabilitation cost $45,456. Major Rehabilitation: Repairs to 3,300 1.f. of the east breakwater, by contract, initiated in July 1985, is 96% complete, and cost $3,597,237. Finalization of FY 85 aerial photography of shoreline contract cost $12,410. 6. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing projects. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non- Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non- Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for construction of service facilities for the 1966 project 32-4 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT modification. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanicalhandling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor at a cost of $36,584. Repairs to 175 l.f. of east and west breakwaters by U.S. derriclboat Tonawanda cost $369,318. Dredging for removal of 68,287 cubic yards of material, by contract, cost $213,284. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $4,261. Engineering effort toward plans and specifications for dredging cost $10,400. 7. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $13,549. Environmental testing of harbor sediments, by contract, cost $20,857. 8. ERIE HARBOR, PA. Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion as authorized by 1899 act was deauthorized in November 1981. Estimated cost (1955) of this portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Estimated cost (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys and economic study by Government plant and hired labor cost $47,517. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $20,907. Dredging, by contract, to remove approx. 75,004 cubic yards of material cost $216,755. Engineering effort cost $11,656. 9. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act which is deferred. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and 32-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $21,876. U.S. derrickboat Simonsen repaired 50 l.f. of west breakwater at a cost of $241,856. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $25,844. Finalization of FY85 dredging contract resulted in a net credit of $26,399. 10. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,350 feet in length; (b) entrance channel about 730 feet long, 100 feet in width, 9 feet deep; (c) inner channels, 100 feet wide totaling 1,500 feet in length and 6 feet deep; (d) a mooring area 0.5 acres in area with a depth of 6 feet; (e) development of recreational facilities and (f) development of wetland mitigation features. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $4,610,000 (Oct. 1985). Non-Federal cost estimate is $4,610,000 (Oct. 1985). Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. (H.D. 409, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. The State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) the responsible agency, signed a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on June 24, 1986. The LCA was executed on the part of the Federal Government on June 26, 1986. Bids for the construction contract were opened on September 16, 1986. The contract was awarded on September 25, 1986 and the construction started on October 9, 1986 is scheduled for completion by May 3, 1989. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial or recreational facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In FY 86, Plans and Specifications were completed and a construction contract was awarded. Federal funds expended for in-house engineering effort were $6,943 to conclude the Advance Engineering and Design and $92,221 for Plans and Specifications under the Construction General Appropriation. Non-Federal expenditure was $64,036. 11. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $7,398. 12. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual 32-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $18,316. Repairs to 800 1.f. of the west pier, by contract, cost $469,334. Economic study, by contract, cost $9,138. Repairs to 200 l.f. of confined disposal area fence and 50 l.f. of east breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $79,685. Finalization of FY85 dredging contract resulted in a net credit of $31,082. In-house engineering effort for plans and specifications cost $53,457. 13. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N.Y. at month of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels a distance of about 1,300 feet; (b) inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet; (c) access channel, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; (d) two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in length at the natural entrance; and (e) recreational facilities of parking area, two comfort stations, concrete walkways and hand railings on the breakwater and jetty and a boat launching ramp. The local sponsor (New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) requested that the boat launching ramp, parking areas and other recreational features be constructed under a separate contract from that for the navigation features. Construction of the breakwaters, jetty, navigation channel and highway bridge removal was completed in May 1986. Total estimated project cost is $14,390,000 (Oct. 1984) including $2,903,000 Federal (which includes the CoE $2,852,000 and the USCG $51,000) and 11,478,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,367,000, lands and damages $290,000, and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the breakwaters, jetties, navigation channel, bridge removal and certain recreational facilities were completed. A net contract credit of $236,690 (Federal funds) was attributable to an adjustment between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. Non-Federal contract cost was $1,520,293. In-house engineering effort cost $69,764 Federal and $68,931 non-Federal. A contract to complete construction of the recreational facilities was awarded on Sept. 25 1986 for $524,600. The work is scheduled for completion in July 1987. 14. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Inspection for structure evaluation cost $2,803. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 28 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319- 22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as 32-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west breakwater shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non-Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing dock and bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by 1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated at $45,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. On March 12, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small-boat harbor. The project consists of constructing a 325-foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Estimated costs for this work are $1,913,000 Federal and $1,831,000 non-Federal (Oct 1985). Local cooperation. For coripleted work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. On March 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the local cooperation agreement, for the Section 107 project, to: (a) Prior to construction, provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project, and for aids to navigation, upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material, including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments or the cost of such retaining works, (b) Provide and maintain a marina with adequate public access facilities, including launching ramps and a public dock, landing or berthing areas for transient vessels, all with sanitary facilities, parking space, with provisions for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water, available to all on equal terms, (c) Provide and maintain depths in berthing and mooring areas commensurate with those provided in the Federal project, (d) Establish and enforce regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor area by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution protection. Provide facilities for onshore disposal of untreated sewage, garbage, debris and other pollutants, (e) Maintain and replace recreational fishing facilities, (f) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its Contractors, (g) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, sewers, utilities, and other structures and improvements required for the construction of the project, (h) Contribute in cash 50 percent of that amount of the total first cost of construction of the project, except aids to navigation, which does not exceed $4,000,000 and all of such costs in excess of $4,000,000; such contribution to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in annual installments as provided under the authority of Section 404 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251), subject to final adjustment based on actual costs, (i) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and right-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act, (j) Comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 (PL 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations in connection with the maintenance and operation of the project. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for Section 107 work was awarded August 8, 1986. Contract costs were $207,283 Federal and $31 non-Federal. In-house engineering cost $56,173 Federal and $14,167 non-Federal. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $40,552. Economic study, by contract, cost $9,071. Repairs to 100 l.f. of the west breakwater and 150 l.f. of the west breakwater extension by the U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $302,289. Removal of an estimated 175,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Black River Channel and upper turning basin, by contract, cost $726,762. Confined disposal facility fencing required repair at a cost of $2,796. In-house engineering costs were $12,485. 16. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) 32-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Con., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition sediment surveys cost $1,283. Maintenance dredging, by contract, removed an estimated 7,500 cubic yards of shoaled material at a cost of $84,014. 17. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River, 62 miles by water from Lake Ontario. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14764.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1635 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1568 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $375,086. Removal of hard material shoals from lower basin portion of project as authorized by 1935 act, at an estimated cost of $183,000 (1954) is classified inactive. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. On April 20, 1983, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized an extension of Lower East Entrance Channel, 600 feet west of the existing pier to a depth of 27 feet below LWD. This was completed in FY 1985. Actual contract cost for this work including supervision and administration was $974,903 Federal and $50,596 non-Federal. In addition to the above described dredging, the local cooperator is required to provide $4,000,000 for upland improvements. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Finalization of in-house engineering effort cost $5,406 Federal funds and $210 non-Federal funds. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys were completed at a cost of $17,691. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $4,202. 18. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $1,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,936. Finalization of FY85 dredging contract resulted in a net credit of $6,615. 19. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N.Y., and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. As modified by Phase I and II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,350 feet and north breakwater about 350 feet long; (b) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8-foot depth contour in lake; (c) river channel 85 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $1,940,000 (Oct 1985). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $1,535,000 (Oct 1985) including cash contribution of $1,225,000. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances have been received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 1986. Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Term- 32-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 inal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In-house engineering effort was continued at a cost of $59,808. 20. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $21,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $46,957. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $22,313. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $4,475. Removal of 410,812 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $1,098,099. Repairs to 400 l.f. of east pier, by contract, cost $531,384. In-house engineering effort toward plans and specifications cost $31,615. 21. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $16,966. Finalization of FY85 dredging contract resulted in net credit of $2,379. Repairs to 440 l.f. of east pier, by contract initiated late in FY85, were completed at a cost of $230,035. Engineering effort cost $958. 22. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511- 12 of. Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000 including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $35,377. Maintenance dredging, by contract, removed 223,345 cubic yards of shoaled material and cost $763,228. Engineering effort cost $14,444. 23. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing 32-10 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deepdraft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition sediment surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $106,985. Removal of 1,237,612 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Bay Channel and the Maumee River Channel, by contract, cost $2,688,035. Repairs to diked disposal facility by hired labor cost $89,675. Biological and environmental study, by contract, cost $81,344. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $16,774. Design of new confined disposal facility, by A/E contract, cost $204,779. Inhouse engineering effort cost $179,637. 24. VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non- Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $97. Finalization of FY85 maintenance dredging contract cost $17,542. 25. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806). Previous project. For details see page 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description see page 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R&H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $1,695. Finalization of FY85 structure repair contract cost $3,299. 26. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Barcelona Harbor, NY Oswego Harbor, NY Pt. Clinton Harbor, OH West Harbor, OH Date of Survey June 1986 May 1986 July 1986 May 1986 FY Cost $ 4,608 17,703 7,357 48,744 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 32-C. 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-D. Navigation work pursuant to Section 302, Public Law 89-298. Lake Neatahwanta, Fulton, NY-Costs of $8,459 were incurred for preparation of Detailed Project Study by contract. In-house engineering effort cost $20,662. Investigation and removal of sunken vessels and other obstructions to navigation under authority of Section 19 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. Removal of sunken Barge No. 45, pinned against the upstream face of Peace Bridge pier 4, on the Niagara River was begun at a cost of $834,000. 32-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Beach Erosion Control 29. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO Location. In the city of Lorain, Lorain County, Ohio, on south shore of Lake Erie between 1,500 and 3,000 feet west of Lorain Harbor west breakwater. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. The Federal cost of the completed project was $1,360,986 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) was $50,000 for relocation. In addition, local interests contributed $583,280. Five-year monitoring program was completed in 1982. Cooperative beach nourishment was conducted in FY 80 and FY 81, during which time a total of 9,000 cubic yards of sand was placed within the project limits. Annual cost of 5- year program for beach replenishment and monitoring was approximately $75,000. In FY 84 an agreement was made between city of Lorain and the Federal government to continue cost sharing, 70% Federal and 30% local, the costs associated with annual beach nourishment until September 30, 1992, as provided by Section 156, P.L. 94-587. A beach nourishment contract was awarded and completed in FY 85, at a cost of $31,704 ($22,465 Federal funds, $9,239 non-Federal funds). Existing project authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 224, 83rd Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In-house engineering effort cost $22 Federal funds and $1,412 non-Federal funds. The Federal cost for nourishment has totalled approximately $98,000 and costs to local interests have totalled approximately $40,000. 30. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of Toledo. The 1,855 acre park has 11,000 feet of shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay (Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Oregon, OH). Existing project. The study for Maumee Bay was conducted under the Western Lake Erie Shore Study authorized by the Committee on Public Works of the House of Representatives on April 11, 1974. The recommended plan as described in the General Affirmation Report (Feb 1986) consists of a protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties along the west half (5,300 ft.) of park shoreline and a rubblemound revetment 7,200 feet long at the east end of the park. Estimated cost of the project is $15,745,000 (Oct 1985) of which $8,407,000 is Federal cost (Corps of Engineers and U.S. Coast Guard) and $7,338,000 is non-Federal cost including Lands, Utilities and other recreation facilities. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, will, prior to construction enter into a binding agreement which addresses project construction and satisfies the requirements of Section 221 of Public Law 91-611. The items of local cooperation listed in the Final Feasibility Report (Dec 83) are: (a) Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; (b) Contribute in cash 30 percent of the project construction cost, including periodic beach nourishment, to be paid in a lump sum prior to initiation of such work. In the event such work is scheduled over more than one Federal Fiscal Year, said contribution may be made in annual installments over the period of construction at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled apportionment of Federal funds to the project with the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual completion of construction and determination of actual costs; (c) Provide appurtenant facilities shown on the State's Master Plan, for which recreational benefits have been taken; (d) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damage due to construction, operation and maintenance of project, except for damage due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its Contractors; (e) Provide without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations to existing improvements including highways, buildings, utilities, sewers, and other facilities which may be required in connection with the construction of the project; (f) Construct permanent park structures and park roads above the 100-year water surface elevation of 577.3 IGLD and consider such elevation when constructing other facilities, which would be significantly affected by high waters; (g) Maintain and repair the protective structures and improvement measures during the useful life thereof as may be required to serve their intended purposes; (h) Control water pollution from within the park to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of the bathers; (i) Maintain continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the Federal participation is based during the economic life of the project; (j) Provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas, and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms; and, (k) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In-house engineering effort cost $175,258. 32-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 31. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N.Y. and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, Ohio, (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835). Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. The Water Resources Development (WRD) Act of March 7, 1974, reinstated and extended authorization for beach erosion control project, as provided in 1960 R&H Act, for a period of five years from date of enactment of 1974 WRD Act, or if the review study of such project is not completed prior to end of such period, until such study is completed and a report thereon submitted to Congress. Work authorized by the 1974 WRD Act was completed in 1979. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act provides for continued annual nourishment by stating: "At expiration of authorization provided in Section 57 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may provide periodic beach nourishment in accordance with cost sharing provisions of Section 103 (a)(2) of Act of October 23, 1962." The act also authorized preparation of a Phase I General Design Memorandum. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum (GDM) was completed in June 1980 and the recommended plan provides for construction of 58 offshore rubblemound breakwater segments, beach restoration by placement of sand fill, and annual beach replenishment for shore protection. A draft reformulation report was prepared in June 1985 to reassess the Presque Isle project and analyze additional plans for controlling beach erosion. The report concluded that the plan selected in the Phase I GDM could be modified to reduce the number of offshore breakwater segments from 58 to 38 and to construct 10,000 feet of bank run gravel beaches along the neck of the peninsula. The project would be constructed by a 12-year staged construction program. On September 20, 1985, the Office, Chief of Engineers recommended to the Assistant Secretary of the Army that the Corps proceed with the ongoing 58-breakwater plan with staged construction. Detailed engineering and design studies (CP&E) conducted in FY 1986 concluded that construction of the 58- breakwater plan by a 12-year staged construction program is the most efficient and practicable plan for reducing the net combined Presque Isle Beach and Erie Harbor annual costs. Estimated Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications (Oct 1985) is $16,291,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $6,872,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications (Oct. 1985) is $8,550,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $2,952,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. The estimated Federal cost (Oct 1985) for the 58 breakwater project is $22,400,000 of which $7,600,000 is for continuation of the present annual nourishment project while the permanent features are being built. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1985) for the breakwater project is $12,000,000 of which $4,100,000 is for continuation of the present annual nourishment project while the permanent features are being built. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources, was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The 58 breakwater project is contingent upon local sponsor, namely the Department of Environmental Resources of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, agreeing in writing to provide without cost to United States all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers and necessary for implementation and for periodic nourishment of the project; provide a cash contribution based on the appropriate percentage of final construction cost, exclusive of lands, easements, and rights-of-way, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law based on shore ownership and use existing at time of construction, which contribution is presently estimated at $12,000,000 or 35 percent ($7,900,000) for permanent project features and 30 percent ($4,100,000) for continuation of the present annual nourishment project while the permanent features are being built; pay 30 percent of the cost for annual beach redistribution and replenishment work for the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works, except for damages due to fault or negligence of Government or its Contractors; maintain and operate all the works, including breakwaters and periodic sand nourishment and redistribution as needed, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and assure continued public ownership and continued public use without cost to the United States of appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain beach for continued public use during life of project. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested and executed prior to initiation of construction of improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRD Act was continued. One contract for 32-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 providing beach nourishment was awarded and completed. A total of 258,000 tons of course sand were placed on the beaches. The contract also included placement of a 12-inch top dressing layer of wave washed sand over the course sand that was used to construct the protective berms. About 37,000 tons of sand that were washed onto the haul roads as a result of the December 2, 1985 storm were removed and used for the dressing layer. Investigations were initiated to locate sources of better quality sand that could be used for the dressing layer in future nourishment. During the year a total of $1,631,374 ($1,101,511 Federal and $529,863 non- Federal) was expended for beach nourishment operations. Of this total, contract costs were $1,030,134 Federal and $484,104 non-Federal. In-house engineering effort cost $71,377 Federal and $45,759 non- Federal. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, contributed $497,143 for their share of the FY 86 nourishment operations. The cumulative non-Federal total project share through FY 86 is $6,903,111. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was submitted to the Secretary of the Army in October 1981 for his review and transmittal to Congress. In FY 86, a total of $181,831 was expended to complete all engineering and design for the permanent project. The Phase II General Design Memorandum which presents the detailed final design of the project recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum was prepared. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 33. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION LAKESHORE PARK ASHTABULA, OHIO Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio, about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Ashtabula North, OH). Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: FY 86 Federal cost was $10,937 for beach nourishment contract and $2,803 for in-house engineering effort. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Century Park, Lorain, OH-Costs of $3,918 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Lake Erie, Timberlake, OH-Costs of $7,500 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Mentor Beach Park, Mentor, OH-Costs of $69,635 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Simms Park, Euclid, OH-Costs of $49,050 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Flood Control 34. ELLICOTT CREEK, N.Y. Location. The proposed channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N.Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.5 miles of existing creek channel including the existing by-pass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 3 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and (h) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $13,500,000 (Sept. 1985). The estimated non-Federal cost is $9,500,000 (Sept. 1985). Completion of preconstruction planning and construction was authorized Dec. 29, 1981, under Section 5, P.L. 97-128. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. On June 22, 1983, a formal Local Cooperation Agreement was requested from N.Y. State. On January 20, 1984 this agreement was fully executed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The FY 85 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88) provided funds to initiate construction of the Federal project. In August 1986 a contract for the Stage 1 portion of the flood control project was awarded. Completion of Stage 1 work is scheduled for August 1987. Stage 2 Plans and Specifications 32-14 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT are being prepared and are 75% completed. Costs for FY 86 were $251,543 contract and $253,740 for inhouse engineering effort. 35. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y. GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N.Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N.Y. (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New Work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir, and service facilities, condition and operation studies and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor for $365,042. Contract for debris removal cost $221,369. Co-Operative Stream Gaging program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic network cost $103,158. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $157,264. Bank erosion study, by contract, was completed at a cost of $11,215. Stability analysis, by contract, cost $3,158. Engineering and design costs of $143,614 were incurred for the preparation of specifications for debris removal, annual facility inspection, dam safety study, seismic study by Waterways Experiment Station, and borings project. 36. OTTAWA, OHIO Location. Ottawa is located on the Blanchard River, approximately 22 miles upstream from its confluence with the Auglaize River. The Blanchard River drains about 765 square miles of the extreme southeastern corner of the Maumee River Basin which covers about 6,586 square miles in northwestern Ohio, northeastern Indiana, and southeastern Michigan. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Ottawa, OH). Existing project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Act of November 7, 1966. The existing project, as recommended in the Preliminary Assessment Report dated July 1985, provides for: earth levees on both banks of the Blanchard River near the west side of the Village totalling 5,300 feet in length; about 2,500 feet of channel improvement work downstream of the Main Street bridge; snagging and clearing betwen the Grand Trunk Western bridge and Main Street bridge, and the installation of storm sewer check valves at about 190 homes. Estimated Federal cost of the project (Oct 85) is $952,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $330,000 (Oct 85) including a cash contribution of $318,000. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, Maumee Watershed Conservancy District, will, prior to construction, enter into a binding written agreement, which addresses project construction and satisfies the requirements of Section 221 of Public Law 91- 611. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-15 of Annual Report for FY 85. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The Draft Reevaluation Report was completed and sent to Division in August for their review and comment at a cost of $142,821. 37. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. The project provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 5,700 linear feet of steel sheet pile wall and 18,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations; and (c) 5,500 linear feet of new storm sewer facilities, including 2,400 linear feet of gravity outfalls. Estimated costs (Oct. 1984) are $9,620,000 Federal and $4,120,000 non-Federal including a cash contribution of $1,180,000. Existing project was authorized by 1972 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed by city of Toledo on January 27, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction to complete 520 linear feet of concrete-faced sheetpile wall protection along the Ottawa River under the Stage 2c contract was completed in Nov. 1985. The entire project was completed in June 1986. Total Federal costs for FY 86 were $56,909 for contract costs, and $52,513 for in-house engineering efforts. Non-Federal funds expended were $34,397 for contract costs and $22,623 for in-house engineering effort. 38. RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH). Existing project. The project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end 32-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike parelleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost of new work consisting of reconstructing to a permanent project the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $6,290,000 (Oct. 1985). Non- Federal cost estimate of $2,095,000 (Oct. 1985) is a cash contribution toward first cost of construction plus all lands, easements, and rights-of-way. Project was authorized under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. (H.D. 554, 80th Congress, 2nd Sess). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of 1982 Annual Report for full requirements of local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be requested upon approval of the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In FY 86 the General Design Memorandum and the Plans and Specifications were completed at the cost of $17,702, thereby completing the inhouse engineering effort. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $132,563. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1986 was $673,442. 40. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY 86 costs were $211,247. 41. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-F. 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-G. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, N.Y. Location. Conesus Lake is situated in western New York State about 25 miles south of the city of Rochester. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Livonia, NY). Existing project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended on July 22, 1985. Project provides for a steel sheet piling and concrete control structure with sluice gates, just upstream of the Route 20A bridge. The outlet channel would be aligned immediately west of the trailer park. The channel is designed with a bottom width of 60 feet and 1V on 3H sideslopes. Downstream of the Route 20A bridge, the creek will be channelized with a 35-foot bottom width and 1V on 3H sideslopes. Downstream of the Route 20A bridge, the creek will be channelized with a 35- foot bottom width and 1V on 3H sideslopes. The channel will continue downstream for about one mile. Approximately 14 acres of land would be needed for acquisition and easements. The non-Federal sponsor would be required to enact and enforce flood plain management regulations. A 1.2 acre parking lot will be provided at the north end of Conesus Lake. A small-boat launching platform and an icefishing access trail will be constructed. The "Ames Parcel" wetland located at the southern end of Conesus Lake is used by northern pike during spring high water levels as a spawning area. Under the mitigation plan, approximately 10 acres of this wetland will be shallowly scalped, graded, and revegetated, to prevent entrapment of fry and eggs, by receding water levels. This plan would provide 25- year flood protection and prevent 96 percent of flood damages. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $867,800 (Oct. 1983). Estimated non-Federal cost is $288,630 (Oct. 1983). Local cooperation. On September 25, 1985, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation agreed to (a) Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its Contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States all necessary changes to buildings, bridges, including approaches, streets, sewers, and utilities, as may be required for the construction of the project; (d) Maintain and operate without cost to the United States the completed works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (e) Enact and enforce flood plain management regulations, meeting the standards established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency for the National Flood Insurance Program under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Act of 1973; (f) Prevent encroachment of any project required flood channels and ponding areas, which would decrease the effectiveness of the project; (g) At least annually, publicize and notify all interested parties that the project does not provide protection against floods greater than the 25-year flood elevation; (h) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; (i) Assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory expenditure limitation of $4,000,000; (j) Comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pur- 32-16 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT suant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations in connection with the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; (k) Contribute 50 percent of the first cost of recreational facilities; including the value of lands, easements, and rights-of-way needed for access, parking, safety and health purposes, presently estimated at $70,000 total Federal and non-Federal costs; (1) Maintain, operate, and replace, without cost to the United States the recreational facilities, at a cost presently estimated at $2,400 annually; and (m) Establish rules to control the use, growth and development of the recreational facilities, with the understanding that public facilities will be open to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract costs were $73,402 Federal. Inhouse engineering effort cost $60,853. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OH Location. Euclid Creek has a drainage area of approximately 25 square miles and is located east of Cleveland in Cuyahoga County and a small portion in Lake County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, East Cleveland, OH). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-14 of the Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1984. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of project is 99% complete, with minor finishing details to be done. Contract cost in FY 86 amounted to $98,461. In-house engineering effort cost $10,330. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY 86 costs for Disaster Preparedness were $187,680. Cost for Emergency Operations were $19,242. Federal costs for Advance Measures were $380,564 and non-Federal costs were $38,033. Two Advance Measures projects went to construction in FY 86. The project at Eastlake, Lake County, Ohio provided for repair to an existing 1,000 foot rubblemound dike. Federal costs for the contract were $107,312 and non-Federal costs were $38,033. The project at Bayview, Erie County, Ohio, provides for placement of a 1,400 foot impervious dike along Sandusky Bay. Federal costs for the contract were $94,085. 43. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 32-H. General Investigations 44. SURVEYS During FY 1986, costs of $1,244,186 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies ..................... $451,491 Flood Damage Prevention Studies ......... 415,192 Shoreline Protection Studies ..................... 0 Special Studies ............... ............... 0 Miscellaneous Investigations ............. 47,851 Coordination Studies ....... .............. 138,757 Phase I GDM Studies ........................... Comprehensive Studies ................ 185,895 Review of Authorized Projects ................ 5,000 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $18,010 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $383,260 incurred under the Operation and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $401,250. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $226,403. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were completed for the West Branch of Silver Creek in the Village of South Russell, Geauga County, OH and Flat Rock Creek in the Village of Paulding, Paulding County, OH. A flood damage study of the Tonawanda Channel of the Upper Niagara River was also completed. The study will assist the New York Power Authority in developing a better understanding of the threshold water levels at which flood damages' may occur. The information will enable the NYPA to provide early warning of impending floods. Hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, banks, insurance agents and other agencies. Costs for general hydrologic studies were $2,132. 46. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $167,467 for advance engineering and design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 10, 36 and 38 in text. 47. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $357,089 for continuation of planning and engineering. For details of individual projects, see sections 30 and 31 in text. 32-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to Text Project Sept. 30, 1986 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. 4. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio 6. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost - - - - 12,805,3391 - - - - 12,805,3391 770,000 253,762 732,518 304,500 9,855,446 673,834 435,196 757,638 325,492 9,835,471 -100,000 55,760 - 6,077,000 5 - 6,077,000 - - 310,000 310,000 11,135,1202 - - 310,000 310,000 11,135,1202 1,065,000 1,502,215 2,423,821 2,869,826 33,735,2103 820,815 1,688,268 2,463,803 2,718,745 33,541,8983 - 620,000 - 250,000 159,998 620,000 409,998 - - - - 23,115,1874 - - - - 23,115,1874 470,000 980,715 2,222,000 1,610,000 51,099,5156 1,033,360 947,421 2,043,936 1,764,633 51,002,8746 - - - - 295,457 - - - - 295,457 951,560 -197,000 954,186 -192,556 - 956 - 956 192,500 50,029 - 242,593 422 1,425 1,425 - 4,804,060 157 4,804,060 93,141 49,039 95,522 51,420 - 2,566,529 - 2,566,529 - - 15,000 178,000 31,846,2996 - - - 193,000 31,846,2996 6,169,500 4,472,125 2,942,000 3,050,000 139,346,4857 4,477,275 6,057,166 3,265,105 3,088,149 139,277,6857 9,492 - 2,915,000 2,895,000 16,104,903 - 2,109,110 3,646,340 16,050,353 - 8,346,6418 - 8,346,6418 1,165,000 901,700 1,074,711 979,729 54,000 651,000 9,124,1029 97,511 633,847 9,106,7369 - 651,850 - 651,850 32-18 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to Text Project Sept. 30, 1986 7. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 8. Erie Harbor, Pa. 9. Fairport Harbor, OH 10. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 12. Huron Harbor Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Irondequoit Bay N.Y. (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 229,335 216,150 2,588,000 332,770 11,161 20,124 72,944 2,020,193 9,338 13,523 - 3,010,02410 - 3,010,02410 35,095 1,712,870 34,406 1,712,144 - 1,950,00011 - 1,950,00011 - 3,597,87312 - 3,597,87312 -12,685 353,185 14,846,75513 301,108 296,835 14,790,40513 - - - - 1,154 - - - - 1,154 - - - - 2,959,61114 - - - - 2,959,61114 675,500 692,469 760,500 267,000 13,037,672 595,053 783,369 764,300 263,177 13,031,840 - 15,000 215,000 - - 92,221 - - 750,000 - - 64,036 - 10,925 - 7,500 706 4,131 892,000 754,221 750,000 64,036 - 610,9591s - 610,95915 7,500 2,374,403 7,398 2,374,301 - - - - 713,544 - - - - 713,544 - - - - 5,103,79516 - - - - 5,103,79516 447,000 1,047,523 465,000 600,000 14,826,926 444,078 996,446 530,980 598,849 14,808,825 - - - - 247,030 - - - - 247,030 - - - - 63,079 - - - - 63,079 135,800 1,060,000 1,450,000 25,000 3,535,800 65,534 838,951 1,747,319 -166,925 3,337,011 32-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to Text Project Sept. 30, 1986 (Contrib. Funds) 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 15. Lorain Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. 17. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Olcott Harbor N.Y. 19. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 1,200,000 - 7,637 - 12,289 - 1,308 - 11,000 - 9,560 - 1,389,500 2,589,500 788,368 1,589,224 2,385,229 62 11,043 - 301,39417 - 301,39417 3,000 3,042,569 2,803 3,047,372 - 742,822 - 742,822 70,000 575,000 21,395,55818 43,839 263,456 21,056,41318 1,397,000 1,421,000 906,000 1,124,000 23,236,429 1,377,008 1,271,705 1,064,095 1,093,955 23,192,013 - 660,000 - 14,198 660,000 14,198 - 1,586,99619 - 1,586,99619 - 1,436 - 1,436 924,000 47,211 788 1,017 35,000 135,076 24,062 - 150,000 317,647 703,736 - 3,801 - 3,801 22,000 50,585 6,205 -25,717 85,297 191,518 191,518 - 1,720,46620 5,406 1,720,46620 26,823 1,357,00721 21,893 1,352,07721 210 57,000 57,000 - 140,21022 - 140,21022 - 76,804 - 69,019 -12,464 -4,679 526,24823 526,24823 - 14,47724 - 14,47724 - 10,000 160,000 - - 59,808 - - 270,000 980,00025 869,80825 270,000 - 2,439,30826 - 2,439,30826 32-20 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to Text Project Sept. 30, 1986 21. Rocky River, Ohio 22. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio 23. Toledo Harbor, Ohio 24. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio 25. Wilson Harbor N.Y. 29. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,721,000 1,795,000 1,106,232 2,069,140 98,000 1,828,000 16,642,81627 422,623 1,734,843 16,528,01627 - 343,494 - 343,494 6,298 7,237 25,004 628,768 14,432 397,652 3,951 2,231,036 245,580 2,230,977 - - - - 6,727,27028 - - - - 6,727,27028 919,000 716,240 909,000 813,000 13,685,439 916,506 683,523 956,276 813,049 13,685,333 - - - - 675,606 - - - - 675,606 - - - - 17,191,84229 - - - - 17,191,84229 3,482,500 4,586,188 3,999,000 3,320,000 73,807,05330 3,540,127 4,037,727 4,632,667 3,367,229 73,771,93930 - - - - 1,156,11831 - - - - 1,156,11831 -- 17,839 543,670 - 17,839 502,128 - 265,885 - 264,586 22,737 25,000 7,108 24,927 - 10,700 - 9,239 -23,903 1,928,219 17,639 1,928,219 - 139,775 - 139,775 - 535,24632 - 535,24632 3,695 4,994 489,25133 489,25133 - 1,741,125 22 1,741,074 1,412 739,700 739,651 740,000 990,000 1,160,000 1,085,000 12,670,562 741,242 426,294 1,708,859 1,101,511 12,667,932 - 1,092 - 1,092 44 44 4,978 4,978 368,175 373,254 497,143 497,143 5,805,712 307,785 1,656 870,230 529,863 5,779,529 32-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total Cost to Text Project Sept. 30, 1986 33. Lakeshore Park Ashtabula, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Ellicott Creek, N.Y. 35. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. Genesee River 37. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Conesus Lake, Livonia, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Euclid Creek, OH New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 195,000 199,957 81,438 61,000 73,709 939 -2,808 85,000 13,739 - -12,293 3,187 14,745 21,494 871,844 797,775 - 249,707 - 249,707 15,000 865,000 2,760,000 -239 505,283 2,384,130 - - - - 23,365,55934 - - - - 23,365,55934 1,035,000 965,000 856,000 990,000 10,891,309 784,649 1,042,141 999,826 1,004,820 10,854,469 2,300,000 2,000,000 3,500,000 117,000 9,916,000 1,348,602 3,149,683 3,512,573 109,421 9,905,490 300,000 690,000 740,000 15,150 290,895 1,408,243 55,000 25,462 32,000 59,834 45,320 1,775,320 57,021 1,771,309 35,000 448,000 24,443 134,255 - 35,000 2,220,000 78,324 - 390,000 1,541,480 992,579 990,000 663,993 35,000 90,000 3,252,000 108,791 3,222,085 32-22 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 15. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 16. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 17. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 18. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 19. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. 21. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 22. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 23. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 25. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 26. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 27. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 28. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 29. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 30. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 31. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 32. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 33. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 34. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 32-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater; pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outerharbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater; thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River; 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging channel through Horseshoe Reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor, to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132. H. Doc. 654,61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900 p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 3d sess. 32-24 Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 19345 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194511 July 14, 1960 Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier; improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.7 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868) 9 Construction of old breakwater. 9 Extension of old breakwater. 9 Stony Point and south breakwater. 9 North breakwater. 9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater. 9 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.9 Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 423, 83d Cong., 2nd sess.4, 8 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232-236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 32-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 15, 1980 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 194514 July 24, 1946 Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth area to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan Avenue bridge. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 5 of Text) West breakwater Part of east breakwater. 9 Extension of east breakwater. 9 Reconstruction of piers. 9 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater; removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater; elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier; and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit.15, 1 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 H. Doc., 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1876, p. 558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc, 189, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No Printed report H. Doc. 891, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 32-26 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 6, 1966 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 175) Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower 2,000 feet of river.3 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin. 25 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater: construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 6 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. Removal of a portion of west breakwater; extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions; construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters; deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. 32-27 H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2d sess. June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 17 Aug. 30, 193511 Oct. 23, 1962 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 7, 19668 Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192220 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long: access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of west pier. 9,' 8 Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet." Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Construction of small boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA. (See Section 8 of Text) Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula. 9 Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and.emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300- foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin. 27 H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 4 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1866 pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871 p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p. 3237.19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 32-28 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 196028 May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier; and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier; and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in the outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. Construction of small boat harbor. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of piers and breakwater. 9 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153 H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1876, pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. 32-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193522 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150-foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 12 of Text) Extension of west pier; construction of east breakwater; removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier; construction of new spur pier; enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin, a detached breakwater, 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and, abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. 29 LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 14 of Text) West entrance pier 9 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.9 East pier and east breakwater. 9 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 15 of Text) Breakwaters and extensions of pies to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock. 12 H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess.4 Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874 p. 256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234 Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718 H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 32-30 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct. 2, 1965 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193511 Apr. 20, 1983 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.3o Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge.8 OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 17 of Text) Deepening the several channels to 19 feet. Widening upper entrance channel to 400 feet, and city front to 350 feet. Enlarging and deepening lower basin to 21 feet, and removal of elevator wharf. Extend Lower East Entrance Channel, 600 feet west of existing pier to a depth of 27 feet below LWD. Dredged material to be disposed of in dredged disposal area site 5, owned by Ogdensburg Bridge and Port Authority. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep betwen parallel piers. 9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Construction of piers.9 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers. 9 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of the existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 PL 89-298. H. Doc. 920, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 663, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 266, 72d Cong., 1st sess. 4 ,24 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess. 4 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437 Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383 H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 32-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193526 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier; a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 21 of Text) East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 22 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of straight and dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of dock channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of bay channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight Channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 23 of Text) A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 Annual Report, 1871, p. 211 H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708 H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693 H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. 32-32 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 4, 1836 Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper End 18 feet deep. Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Deepen Bay Channel including widenings to 28 feet, deepen River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge.3 ' VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 24 of Text) Parellel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WILSON HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 25 of Text) Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. (See Section 31 of Text) Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced off-shore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 Annual Report, 1880 Annual Report, 1874, p. 219 H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d sess. 32-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-B (Continued) 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriation Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 81. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944, approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Removal of remaining hard-material shoals in lower basin is classified inactive. 25. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 26. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 27. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 82. 28. Modification classified inactive. 29. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. 30. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 classified deferred. 31. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 32-34 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1986 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Barcelona -Harbor, N.Y. 1985 1,185,85318 1,921,187 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' _2 19,7633 Black River Harbor, N.Y.4 -2 42,401 - Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. 1962 275,082 1,562,244 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y.5 .2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. 1978 101,500 - Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. 4, 7 1891 9,0003 - Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. 6 1973 72,052 - Kelleys Island, Ohio 197415 129,874 - Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y.9 1969 46,8048 42,393 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. 9 1949 6,221 9,69412 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. 9,'0 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N.Y. 9,' 6 1964 559,45711 141,059 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. 1985 8,430,01619 5,969,81520 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio14 197715 99,000 - Port Bay, N.Y. - - - Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio 1985 71,950 909,869 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y.'3 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio 195115 51,609 12,720 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. 1982 25,010 24,023 Sandusky River, Ohio4 1894 58,0003 557 West Harbor, Ohio9 1985 7,098,89817 35,103 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project classified deferred. 7. Channel improved by local interests. 8. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 9. Completed. 10. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 13. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 14. Project classified inactive. 15. Annual Report for Detroit District. 16. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 17. Includes local interests contribution of $3,795,000. 18. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 19. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 20. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. Excludes $307,590 for rehab. 32-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-D NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 28 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Beaver Creek, OH $ 7,500 Chimney Bluffs State Park, Huron, NY 2,500 Edgewater Marina, Cleveland, OH 12,525 Huron Harbor, OH 5,796 Lake Erie, Harbor Creek, PA 7,500 Lake Erie, North East, PA 7,500 Lake Erie, Sheffield, OH 5,653 Lake Erie, Sturgeon Point, NY 96,898 Little River, Niagara Falls, NY 42,064 Long Point State Park, NY 2,500 NFTA-Sm Boat Hbr. Buffalo, NY 449 Seneca Lake, Watkins Glen, NY 6,246 Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp, OH 30,939 Wards Canal, Jerusalem Twp, OH 7,500 TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 32 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' White City Park' Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y. 2 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. 3 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y.5 1976 $1,769,600 - Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.4 1963 58,978 $2,946 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954 is classified as deferred. 2. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1958 is classified as deferred. 3. Project authorized under provisions of Section 201, 1965 Flood Control Act has been reclassified to active. 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from onethird to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. Uncompleted portion of project is classified as deferred. 5. Project completed. 32-36 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N.Y. Owasco Outlet1 1962 371,9856 Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N.Y.1 1957 335,385 - Caledonia, Genesee River, N.Y. 1950 - - Camp Perry, Ohio' 1967" 275,00010 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y.' 1984 1,404,500 - Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N.Y.2,3 1948 12,464 - Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio 1985 1,117,000 - Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. 1985 490,300 - Eastlake, Ohio, Chagrin River3 1976 506,344 - Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' 1976 8,589,8249 - Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet, N.Y.' 1978 3,929,33012 Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek' 1971 3,542,0687 - Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N.Y.' 1954 797,300 - Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y.5 - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 1,681,785 - Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y.',5 1964 330,231 - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y.4 1950 281,559 - Red Creek, N.Y.3 1975 361,241 - Scajaquada Creek, N.Y.' 1985 4,944,852 - Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' 1954 3,349,248 - Warsaw, N.Y., Oatka Creek',5 1969 558,3178 - Wellsville, N.Y., Genesee River' 1978 3,145,30313 1. Completed. 2. Local interests required to contribute $25,000. 3. Project not considered economically justified and is inactive. 4. Inactive portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interests and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 5. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 8. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes costs of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $125,000. 11. Annual Report for Detroit District. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 13. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 32-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 32-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Butternut Creek, Dewitt, NY Canadaigua Lake, NY Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY Chagrin River, Willoughby Hills, OH Chittenango Creek, Sullivan, NY Keuka Lake Outlet, NY Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY Maumee River, Defiance, OH Oneida Creek, Oneida, NY Plum Creek, Columbia Station, OH Sandusky River, Fremont, OH Swan Creek, Toledo, OH W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY Fiscal Year Cost $103,183 48,615 28,120 239 22,487 91,902 194 27,136 55,841 36,502 1,000 69,340 12,935 Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control. (Sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, PL 780, 83rd Cong.) Project and location Fiscal Year Cost Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH $3,231 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost Baker Creek, Bridge No. 2-7, Allen, NY $ 700 Black Creek, County Home, Angelica, NY 1,500 Blanchard River, Ottawa, OH 1,383 Chagrin River, East Branch, Baldwin Rd., OH 17,438 Chagrin River, East Branch, SR 615, OH 3,737 Chagrin River, Gates Mills, OH 298 Cold Creek, Bridge No. 13-4, Hume, NY 700 Cuyahoga River, Akron, OH (Bridge) 476 Cuyahoga River, Akron, OH (Sewer) 202,5001 Geneva, SR 531, OH 134,061 Lake Erie, Beachview Dr., OH 7,500 Rogers Cemetery, Amity, NY 408 Rush Creek, Bridge No. 20-14, Angelica, NY 1,500 Rush Creek, Bridge No. 2-1, Allen, NY 3,100 Seneca Lake, Watkins Glen, NY 9,352 Seneca River, Seneca Falls, NY 9,957 Wendt Beach Pk, Evans, NY 276 1. Does not include $315,886 in contributed funds. 32-38 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-H DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 43 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1962 Aug 1977 - Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 - Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act 19683 Nov 1979 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981 - - Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 - - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 $ 1,524 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000 Ithaca, NY-Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159 Ithaca, NY-Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19713 Nov 1977 12,000 Niagara River, Compensating Works, NY 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 - - Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act2 1963 May 1981 - - Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - - Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 - 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 32-39 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area, about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ), which is in southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA ...................... 33-2 2. Morro Bay Harbor, CA .............. 33-2 3. Oceanside Harbor, CA ............ . 33-2 4. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA ........... 33-2 5. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA ........................ 33-3 6. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ............................. 33-3 Beach Erosion Control 7. Imperial Beach, San Diego County, CA ......................... 33-3 Flood Control 8. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ .......................... 33-3 9. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA .................... 33-3 10. Gila River Basin, AZ: ............... 33-4 10A. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ .......................... 33-4 10B. Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity (including New River) ............... 33-4 10C. Tucson diversion channel, AZ ................................... 33-5 10D. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ .......................... 33-5 11. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA ............................ 33-5 12. Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA ......................... 33-6 13. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ................ 33-6 14. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA .................... 33-6 15. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV ............ 33-7 16. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA ................ 33-7 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 17. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA ...................... 33-7 18. West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, CA ................. 33-7 19. Inspection of completed flood control projects ...................... 33-7 20. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ........................... 33-7 21. Flood control work under special authorization ................ 33-8 General Investigations 22. Surveys ............................. 33-8 23: Collection and study of basic data ................................. 33-8 24. Research and development ............ 33-8 25. Continuation of planning and engineering ...................... 33-8 25A. Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ ....... 33-8 25B. Santa Ana River main stemincluding Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ............................ 33-8 26. Advance engineering and design ................................ 33-8 Goleta, CA, and vicinity, Santa Barbara County .............. 33-8 Tables Table 33-A Table 33-B Table 33-C Table 33-D Cost and financial statement .................... 33-10 Authorizing legislation .................. 33-14 Other authorized navigation projects .......... 33-18 Other authorized beach erosion control projects .............. 33-18 33-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Tables (Cont'd) Page Table 33-E Other authorized flood control projects ............... 33-19 Table 33-F Not applicable Table 33-G Deauthorized projects ........ 33-21 Table 33-H Reconnaissance and condition surveys ............ 33-22 Table 33-I Los Angeles County drainage area, CA: Latest approved estimated first costs for all units of improvement under existing project .............. 33-22 Table 33-J Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Latest approved estimated Federal first cost for all units ......................... 33-24 Table 33-K Inspection of completed flood control projects ......... 33-24 Table 33-L Flood control work under special authorization ......... 33-25 1. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro Bay about 25 miles south of City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1984. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Terminal facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 81,673 feet of wharves, of which 74,849 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, of which 51,775 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy mole, exclusive of finger piers. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance repair (phase 3) of San Pedro breakwater in September 1986 at a cost of $1,128,600 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $54,849. 2. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. None required under rehabilitation plan. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers constructed by Navy; 550 feet of piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department of Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by City of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance repair of north breakwater (phase 2) in November 1985 at a cost of -$6,835 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $89,893. 3. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for maintenance to date. Terminal facilities. Berthing for 915 boats (750 single-tie slips, 46 double-tie slips, and 119 side-ties, of which 47 are visitors slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars, with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for and initiated maintenance dredging, which is about 73 percent complete, at cost of $813,739 regular funds and $610,779 Navy funds. Continued construction of second contract for experimental sand bypass system, pump facilities and power system, which is about 62 percent complete. Cost for construction was $3,134,943 regular funds. 4. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1983. 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging in September 1986 at a cost of $486,627 regular funds. 5. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1981.. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two fuel docks; guest berthing docks; 3 boat-repair facilities, 1 full service with a 60- ton travelift, 1 full service with a 150-ton marine elevator, and 1 do-it-yourself boatyard with a 20-ton travelift Fisherman's Pier, with 3 50-ton jib cranes for off-loading commercial fishing vessels; flake ice manufacturing and distribution system; 3 wholesale fish buying stations; a retail fish market and seafood restaurant; offshore oil industry crew transportation; 1,800 boat slips; a mast up dry storage area for 112 trailerable boats; a 6-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; restaurants; cocktail lounges; sport-fishing facilities; harbor and offshore islands excursion boats; 3 yacht sales; marine communications sales and services; 3 marine chandleries; 2 public restroom buildings; a harbor administration building/harbor master's office; a headquarters/visitors center for Channel Islands National Park; marine related ancillary businesses, including a convenience grocery store, a marine bookstore, a dive shop, gift shops, and a jewelry store; and a 230-room resort and time-share hotel. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap in March 1986 at a cost of $1,578,000 regular funds and $10,000 other contributed funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $35,920. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 33-H. Beach Erosion Control 7. IMPERIAL BEACH, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Imperial Beach in San Diego County. Existing project. Plan as modified by Chief of Engineers in August 1979 provides for a submerged offshore breakwater about 5,000 feet long, extending southward from northern groin; extension of northern groin about 100 feet to connect with breakwater; and a groin about 600 feet long from shoreline to southern end of breakwater. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project as modified is $5,880,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $3,340,000 Federal and $2,540,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 4, General Design Memorandum, Imperial Beach Erosion Control Project, San Diego County, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in September 1978. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-6 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. First construction contract, breakwater (phase 1), was terminated as a result of a U.S. Federal Court preliminary injunction in January 1986. Flood Control 8. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ, in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill Williams River, AZ, a tributary of Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Initiated preparation of water control manual. 9. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In and near the Cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a debris basin on Cucamonga Creek and a concrete channel along Cucamonga Creek from the debris basin to Prado Dam; an improved San Antonio Heights diversion system that would include 6 debris basins and a concrete diversion channel to divert West Cucamonga Creek headwaters into Cucamonga Creek; a collection levee and a debris basin downstream from Demens, 33-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Thorpe, and Angalls Canyons and a concrete outlet channel from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; a debris basin in Deer Canyon and a channel along Deer Creek from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; the Hillside debris basin in a canyon just west of Deer Canyon with an outlet channel to Deer Creek channel; improvement of an existing levee system along the west bank of Day Creek to assure that flows from Day Canyon do not enter Deer Creek channel; turnouts to mitigate ground water basin recharge losses; landscaping appropriate for esthetic treatment; and recreational facilities in the project area. Subdrainage would be provided along specific reaches of the channels. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for modified project is $117,856,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $93,900,000 Federal and $23,956,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Flood Control and Recreation, Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in June 1973. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of thirteenth contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Demens Creeks channels (part 2), in April 1986. Continued construction of fourteenth contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Deer Creeks, which is about 99 percent complete. Awarded contract for; initiated; and completed construction of fifteenth contract, recreational facilities (part 1), in May 1986. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for sixteenth contract, recreational facilities (part 2); awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 91 percent complete. Administered rights-of-way acquisition completed by local interests. Cost for construction of channels was $154,053 regular funds; and for recreational facilities, $329,669 regular funds and $301,644 required contributed funds. 10. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 10A. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, AZ, in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 10B. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements with some floodproofing along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Latest approved estimated (1985) first cost for modified project is $443,512,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $255,009,000 Federal and $188,503,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum- Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated construction of Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 1, Skunk Creek to Cactus Road, which is about 95 percent complete. Costs for construction of channels were $11,868,854 regular funds, $266,859 required contributed funds, and $740,144 other contributed funds. Costs for construction of dam were $206,532 regular funds and $4,863 required contributed funds; for roads, railroads, and bridges, $18,221 regular funds and $429 required contributed funds; and for buildings, grounds, and utilities, -$1,597 regular funds and -$39 required contributed funds. Completed preparation of part 4 of project plan, phase II, Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers, and initiated preparation of plans and specifications. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 2A, Cactus Road to 47th Drive. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for recreational facilities (phase 2) at Dreamy Draw Dam. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 2B, 47th Drive to Cave Creek. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for recreational facilities, Arizona Canal diversion channel, City of Glendale. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 10C. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, AZ Location. In Pima County in drainage areas of Tucson Arroyo and Julian Wash, tributaries of Santa Cruz River near Tucson, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of recreational facilities (phase 1) in December 1985 at a cost of $109,960 regular funds and $109,961 required contributed funds. 10D. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. On Queen Creek, AZ, a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; completed acquisition of rights-of-way; and administered real estate. 11. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Plan provides for flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, CA, as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Provides for protection of about 325,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, and other cities. Plan provides for construction of 5 flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda, and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 193.69 miles of tributary channels. All units of improvement are physically completed in those four stream basins, except the one listed below, and are described in Annual Report for 1962. A rehabilitation plan was approved in May 1984. The rehabilitation plan provides for restoring deteriorated portions of the Los Angeles River channel along a 23.5- mile reach from Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road, and for repairing and improving the Los Angeles River channel along a 1-mile reach upstream from Sepulveda Dam in the vicinity of Balboa Boulevard. Latest approved estimated (1985) Federal first cost for rehabilitation is $29,700,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period). A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Unit of improvement not physically completed in Rio Hondo Basin is Sierra Madre Wash. Plan provides for the construction of about 0.8 mile of concrete channel on Sierra Madre Wash extending from inlet to existing Santa Anita Wash channel. (See table 33-I for latest approved estimated (1976) first costs for all units of improvement under existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Lopez Dam: Completed preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Administered real estate. Completed construction of fourth rehabilitation contract, channel invert (Sepulveda Dam basin), in November 1985. Completed construction of fifth rehabilitation contract, low flow channel (Dayton Ave. to Stewart and Gray Rd.), in December 1985. Completed construction of sixth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert (Burbank-Western confluence), in October 1985. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for seventh rehabilitation contract, sideslope (Olympic Blvd. to Washington Blvd.) and main channel invert (4th St. to Washington Blvd.); awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 26 percent complete. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for eighth rehabilitation contract, subdrain flapgates (Dayton Ave. to Stewart and Gray Rd.); awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 56 percent complete. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for ninth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay under 4 bridges (Golden State Fwy to Fletcher Dr). Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for tenth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay (Dayton Ave. to Atlantic Blvd.); and awarded contract. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for eleventh rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay (Niagara St. to Burbank-Western channel confluence). Initiated preparation of plans and specifica- 33-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 tions for twelfth rehabilitation contract, joint repair (Dayton Ave. to Stewart and Gray Rd.). Cost for construction of channels was $2,899,361 regular funds. (f) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Initiated construction of phase 2A construction of recreational facilities, which is about 87 percent complete, at a cost of $382,354 regular funds, $352,572 required contributed funds, and $221,716 other contributed funds. (g) Sepulveda Dam: Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Completed contract payment for construction of phase 5 recreational facilities at a cost of $2,000 other contributed funds. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Alhambra Wash: Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulevard in good operating condition. (b) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Initiated construction of phase 2A construction of recreational facilities, which is about 87 percent complete, at a cost of $382,354 regular funds, $352,572 required contributed funds, and $221,716 other contributed funds. OpetLLIUII U IILl 111 DUlona Cl LG s.iL ni11. Creek channel and jetties: Maintained channel downstream from Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue and downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to ocean; jetties; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operating condition. 12. LOS COCHES CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Location. In the community of Lakeside, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for a 1.8-mile-long rectangular concrete channel; an inlet structure just downstream from the Los Coches Creek bridge and adjacent to Los Coches and Ha-Hana Roads; and an outlet structure at the confluence of the San Diego River. Plan also provides for 5 double box culverts and 1 triple box culvert. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project is $6,197,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $2,197,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1985. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded first contract and initiated construction, which is about 67 percent complete, at a cost of $1,823,430 regular funds and $3,915,870 required contributed funds. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for mitigation measures. 13. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Near San Bernardino and Colton, San Bernardino County, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for a rectangular concrete channel extending for 3.5 miles along East Branch of Lytle Creek from existing Foothill Boulevard inlet structure to confluence with Warm Creek; a concrete trapezoidal channel on Warm Creek for 1.5 miles from confluence with East Branch of Lytle Creek to confluence with Santa Ana River; a leveed channel extending about 1.8 miles along Santa Ana River from mouth of existing East Twin and Warm Creeks concrete channel to Mount Vernon Avenue crossing; replacement of 4 railroad bridges and 12 highway bridges; 3 new highway bridges; inlets for side drainage; and relocation and protection of utilities. Design capacities of improvements would be: East Branch of Lytle Creek, 58,000 cubic feet per second; Warm Creek, 60,000 to 90,000 cubic feet per second; and Santa Ana River, 167,000 to 234,000 cubic feet per second. Latest approved estimated (1984) first cost of modified project is $44,410,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $37,600,000 Federal and $6,810,000 non-Federal. AuthorizI ed proj;+e ct .. as m;;odified by iDeign Memorandum No. 1, approved in May 1972, which contains a map of modified project plan. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of plans and specifications to correct project deficiency; awarded contract; and initiated construction, which is about 44 perent complete, at a cost of $946,437 regular funds. 14. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 15. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. 16. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. For details, see page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing project. For details on active units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see table 33-E, "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects," and table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." (See table 33-J for latest approved estimated Federal first cost for all units.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in existing project: (a) Brea Dam: Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Initiated and completed construction of fourth contract for recreational facilities (phase 3) in February 1986 at a cost of $55,547 regular funds and $57,049 required contributed funds. Maintained project in good operating condition; administered real estate; and completed acquisition of rights-of-way. (c) Fullerton Dam: Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. 17. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for about 3.2 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Approved estimated (1986) first cost for project is $49,000,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $25,200,000 Federal and $23,800,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "General Design Memorandum No. 1 for Sweetwater River Flood Control Channel, San Diego County, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1982 and revised in May 1984. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-16 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Continued stage 2 construction, which is about 50 percent complete. California State Department of Transportation awarded contract for and initiated stage 3 construction, which is about 30 percent complete. Cost for construction of channels was $5,635,391 regular funds. Cost for roads, railroads, and bridges was $185,475 regular funds. 18. WEST MAGNESIA CANYON CHANNEL, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Location. In the City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for a debris basin at mouth of Magnesia Spring Canyon; a 1.4-mile-long rectangular concrete channel; and an energy dissipator at the confluence of the Whitewater River. Plan also provides for preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat values on 20 acres of alluvial cone. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project is $8,279,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $4,279,000 non- Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1985. Operations during fiscal year. Continued construction of first contract, which is about 99 percent complete, at a cost of $2,959,088 regular funds and $1,600,467 required contributed funds. Initiated and completed preparation of plans and specifications for mitigation measures, and awarded second contract. 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $307,158. (See table 33-K on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 20. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Hoover Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $60,328. 33-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-L on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $199,763 for Rillito River, Pima County, AZ; $49,095 for Nazlini Wash, Chinle, AZ; and $15,208 for Santa Ana River, Colton, CA. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $166,774, all of which was for advance preparation. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $69,137 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 22. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $5,010,712 regular funds, of which $557,626 were for navigation studies; $75,254 were for beach erosion control studies; $2,990,848 were for flood control studies; $1,113,995 were for surveys; $107,127 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $65,765 were for review of authorized projects; $95,963 were for miscellaneous activities; and $4,134 were for supplemental preauthorization studies, phase I. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $159,661 for technical services; and $90,512 for flood plain management. 24. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year cost was $13,605 for hydrologic studies. 25. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 25A. HOLBROOK LEVEE, LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, AZ Holbrook levee is on Little Colorado River at Holbrook, Navajo County, AZ, in northeastern Arizona, about 200 miles northeast of Phoenix. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for raising existing north bank levee and adding a new south bank levee, a low flow channel, recreational facilities, and mitigation features. Existing levee (north) would be raised to a height ranging from 23 feet high upstream from Apache Railroad bridge to about 12 feet high downstream from bridge, and would be about 18,000 feet long. South side levee would be about 5,000 feet long and would have a maximum height of 23 feet. Continued preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $970,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $3,997. 25B. SANTA ANA RIVER MAIN STEM -INCLUDING SANTIAGO CREEK AND OAK STREET DRAIN, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Santa Ana River main stem-including Santiago Creek and Oak Street Drain, Santa Ana River Basin, CA, is on Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, dated October 22, 1976. Plan of improvement provides for construction of Mentone Dam near community of Mentone, San Bernardino County; management of flood plain between Mentone Dam and Prado Reservoir; improvement of Oak Street Drain in Corona, Riverside County; enlargement of existing Prado Dam and reservoir, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties; improvement of lower Santa Ana River channel from Prado Dam to Pacific Ocean; and improvement of lower reach of Santiago Creek channel in Orange County; recreational development along project length; purchase of 8 acres of salt marsh for mitigation of project effects; purchase of 84 acres of tidal lands at mouth of Santa Ana River for preservation of endangered least tern habitat; landscaping; and recreational features. Continued preparation of project plan, phase II, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $21,000,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $3,622,203. 26. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN GOLETA, CA, AND VICINITY, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY Goleta, CA, and vicinity is in Goleta Valley along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT CA. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising about 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,650,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $7,539. 33-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 1. Los Angeles and New Work: Long Beach Harbors, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 2. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 3. Oceanside Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 4. Santa Barbara Harbor CA 5. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA 7. Imperial Beach, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds 8. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ 9. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost $ 458,000 57,000 - 491,644 600,512 563,908 33-10 ------- p5,323,000 -$340,000 -$69,000 - $64,710,7191 5,721,814 -268,794 17,627 18,467 64,317,6311 2,768,600 704,000 1,102,904 1,821,249 11,770,2122 358,760 3,062,364 1,065,667 1,889,994 11,742,6152 214,180 - - - 1,203,180 175,655 80,057 - - 1,169,426 3,807,130 - - - 37,961,7053 4,641,542 515,690 - - 37,510,2813 - - - - 2,612,0934 - - - - 2,612,0934 1,573,052 165,000 3,021,874 149,093 9,814,9065 60,846 1,676,263 2,920,156 251,252 9,864,0415 - - - - 2,128,411 - - - - 2,128,411 5,081,782 -1,970,133 1,162,500 5,019,575 14,247,6146 642,862 2,411,303 1,001,590 5,192,340 14,092,6516 - - - - 491,2867 -- - - 491,2867 -- - - 1,200,000 7,500 - - - 1,187,500 - - - - 172,0008 - - - - 172,0008 945,543 341,000 328,000 720,700 9,308,8199 555,992 729,914 324,420 686,790 9,270,5609 - - - - 1,711,53910 - - - - 1,711,53910 2,488,000 653,000 1,635,000 1,823,920 15,752,35711 2,329,024 818,882 1,635,618 1,836,388 15,749,15611 - 2,000,000 493,000 - 3,342,75712 74,623 103,226 31,271 721,296 1,554,66412 - - 2,710,000 - 2,735,601 - - - 518,753 544,337 - - - - 16,934,060's13 - - -525 -56 16,933,47913 487,000 494,000 546,000 697,000 5,125,799 372,021 580,299 579,462 684,264 5,086,192 3,950,000 100,000 1,553,000 160,600 93,360,500 4,057,329 1,041,150 2,686,070 370,430 93,265,270 -- LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project (Other Contrib. Funds) 10A. Gila River Basin, AZ, Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) 10B. Gila River Basin, AZ, Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity including New River) Regular Funds) Required Contrib.) unds) Other Contrib. Funds) 10C. Gila River Basin, AZ, Tucson diversion channel (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) 10D. Gila River Basin, AZ, Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 11. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. unds) 12. Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. unds) Funding New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Total Cost to FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 -270,893 400,965 594,000 551,293 4,680,000 5,621,403 -39,526 6,823 472,000 479,419 12,860,000 11,998,004 346,000 500,000 621,000 81,743 624,923 149,008 - - 1,775,000 - - 10,169 80,000 600,000 150,000 6,638 88,109 561,122 - - 750,000 - - 567,634 64,521 -57,000 9,390,853 47,380 27,728 9,332,278 - - 19,980,56414 - - 19,980,56414 752,000 651,000 8,185,148 751,204 616,553 8,109,859 5,600,000 16,539,000 84,894,297 6,526,194 15,556,495 83,140,766 333,500 2,668,714 275,076 1,802,685 - 2,234,700 740,297 1,147,028 - 6,927,62515 16 165,457 6,917,76715 17 178,217 145,000 143,000 135,000 42,000 84,911 206,863 134,559 39,914 967,700 -23,800 367,925 858,698 9,107,000 3,084,000 5,723,627 6,864,570 - 5,000,000 - 1,800,240 286,818 378,256 50,000 154,571 166,382 207,361 4,264,000 3,474,626 6,520,000 9,475,162 6,028 516,000 308,007 200,000 228,946 51,373 - 245,000 10,054 240,846 - 100,000 750,000 745,851 1,867,96318 1,867,96318 943,413 940,305 - 377,026,88519 20 -1,199 377,018,68119 21 3,444,000 55,624,02019 22 4,423,901 55,343,99719 23 6,869,000 18,389,000 3,929,743 15,204,905 - 13,933,34124 659 13,890,86625 - 516,00026 352,572 352,57227 - 36,644,86528 - 36,639,88828 161,186 669,19329 241,091 521,41030 2,070,399 2,600,399 1,994,218 2,512,246 4,700,000 4,800,000 3,915,870 3,915,870 33-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 13. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 14. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 15. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV 16. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 17. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA 18. West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost -21,026 - 200,000 2,583,000 37,828,83131' -6,210 202,993 1,150,453 36,369,51431 - - - 17,838,198 - - - - 17,838,198 653,000 342,000 275,000 116,000 3,144,548 244,816 588,335 391,117 180,500 3,143,894 - - - - 286,300 - - - - 284,501 - - - - 1,401,248 - - - - 1,401,248 63,000 43,070 819,300 83,204 2,266,000 1,686,767 21,149 240,000 261,434 23,800 770,398 1,377,000 1,775,951 143,000 105,000 1,104,356 139,766 108,416 1,101,925 17,747 2,039,000 2,202,404 -17,394 -432 75,000 145,000 1,500,000 136,413 467,244 20,000 80,000 16,223 84,040 4,000,000 4,964,685 705,000 322,836 - 47,994,73832 33 34 -436 47,992,52732 33 35 1,886,600 1,982,194 24,157,41036 38 24,075,50337 38 - 3,122,76239 4,132 3,103,32240 67,555 6,242,000 6,295,436 2,765,000 3,146,924 75,00041 67,55542 13,366,503 13,343,279 4,000,000 3,999,725 350,000 1,974,206 2,324,206 266,137 1,715,919 1,982,056 1. Includes $2,187,047 for new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer of land at Reservation Point; and $996,792 emergency relief funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy for new work on middle breakwater, and Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previous project and $177,076 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 3. Includes $1,672,575 for new work betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. Excludes $87,120 for maintenance betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 4. Navy funds. 5. Includes $354,791 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. Excludes $124,578 other contributed funds. 6. Includes $69,804 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $5,170,266 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 7. For jetty and groin extensions desired by local interests. 8. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 9. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000 working funds for work performed in addition to existing project; and $19,741 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $462,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interests. 10. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 11. Includes $89,819 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 12. Excludes $66,124 other contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 13. Includes $57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 14. Includes $357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 15. Excludes $394,364 other contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,163,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 17. Includes $1,153,142 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 18. Includes $3,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 19. Includes $11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new work. Excludes $16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 20. Includes $23,763,900 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,226,100 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,422,100 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 21. Includes $23,755,695 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 (1,223,226 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,416,769 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 22. Includes $925,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($460,000 for Sepulveda Dam and $465,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 23. Includes $870,613 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($441,680 for Sepulveda Dam and $428,933 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 24. Includes $13,933,341 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,797,556 for Whittier Narrows am; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 25. Includes $13,890,866 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,755,401 for Whittier Narrows am; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,180 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 26. Includes $516,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($516,000 for Los Angeles and Rio Hondo channels). 27. Includes $352,572 for recreational facilities since FY 1986 ($352,572 for Los Angeles and Rio Hondo channels). 28. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1986, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 29. Includes $669,193 for recreational facilities since FY 1984 ($299,193 for Santa Fe Dam and $370,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 30. Includes $521,410 for recreational facilities since FY 1984 ($299,193 for Santa Fe Dam and $222,217 for Los Angeles and Rio Hondo channels). 31. Excludes $5,499,193 other contributed funds. 32. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antonio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel (active units). 33. Includes $5,000 working funds for San Antonio Dam; $67,361 for San Juan Dam (inactive unit) (also reported under "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects"); and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps, as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; $8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and $601,762 for required items of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 34. Includes $5,920,831 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,264,300 or Fullerton Dam; and $3,597,800 for Prado Dam). 35. Includes $5,918,620 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,262,882 or Fullerton Dam; and $3,597,007 for Prado Dam). 36. Includes $75,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($75,000 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 37. Includes $71,421 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($71,421 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 38. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. 39. Includes $3,122,762 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,426,973 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,269,789 or Fullerton Dam; and $426,000 for Prado Dam). 40. Includes $3,103,322 Code 710 funds since FY 1975 ($1,426,973 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,250,349 or Fullerton Dam; and $426,000 for Prado Dam). 41. Includes $75,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($75,000 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 42. Includes $67,555 for recreational facilities since FY 1986 ($67,555 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 33-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 3, 1954 LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). S. Doc. 18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1013, 66th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles S. Doc. 130, 71st Cong., inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 650 2d sess. feet wide in East Basin from turning basin to U.S. station 406; dredge 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; a turning basin 35 feet deep at Long Beach; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot-wide entrance channel to Los Angeles S. Committee print, outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 74th Cong., 1st sess. feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet areas A and B adjacent to H. Doc. 843, 76th Cong., 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a 3d sess. rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward direction from northeast end of existing detached breakwater; dredge about 4 million cubic yards initially for a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, and deposit material on beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of areas A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modifi- H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., cation of existing project. This act provides that the Secre- 1st sess. tary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. 33-14 s LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 2. Mar. 2, 1945 3. Oct. 27, 1965 4. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 5. Aug. 13, 1968 7. July 3, 1958 8. Dec. 22, 1944 9. Aug. 13, 1968 10A. May 17, 1950 Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a H. Doc. 401, 86th Cong., modification of existing project. 2d sess. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet H. Doc 94-594, 94th deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Cong., 2d sess.' Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to H. Doc, 283, 77th Cong., bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro 1st sess. Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar H. Doc. 76, 89th Cong., Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. 1st sess. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed S. Committee Print, 73d by breakwater constructed by local interests. Cong., 2d sess. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercept- H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., ing plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of 1st sess. local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' Dredging and maintenance by United States. None VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction 2d sess. of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. IMPERIAL BEACH, CA Federal participation by contribution of Federal funds H . Doc. 399, 84th Cong., toward cost of five groins. 2d sess. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and H. Doc. 323, 90th Cong., a diversion system. 2d sess. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. H. Doc. 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 33-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10B. Oct. 27, 1965 10C. June 30, 1948 10OD. July 24, 1946 11. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep., 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 12. Feb. 7, 19852 PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed 70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. LOS COCHES CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Channel improvements. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 274, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. None None None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None None None None 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Oct. 27, 1965 14. July 14, 1960 15. May 17, 1950 16. June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 17. Aug. 13, 1968 18. Feb. 7, 19852 Channels and levees. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000.) Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. WEST MAGNESIA CANYON CHANNEL, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Debris basin, channel improvements, energy dissipator, and preservation and enhancement of wildlife values. S. Doc. 53, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess.' None H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. None 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 33-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Channel Islands Harbor, CA Completed 1985 $5,123,3451 $21,484,2892 Dana Point Harbor, CA Completed 1984 4,737,5503 555,1474 Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA Completed 1981 4,238,7525 1,382,6136 Newport Bay Harbor, CA Inactive 1982 796,8977 609,5698 Port Hueneme, CA Completed (part) 1984 1,496,4009 1,258,90410 & Deferred (part) Port San Luis, CA Completed & 1984 1,322,01911 952,22212 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA Completed 1984 4,766,89813 1,472,08514 San Diego Harbor, CA Completed 1985 28,092,19915 2,386,52616 San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA Completed 1985 11,972,23217 4,789,65818 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; 12. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to and $210,748 other contributed funds. modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $18,958 for 2. Includes $26,593 for reconnaissance and condition reconnaissance and condition surveys. Includes $105,608 surveys. Excludes $4,889,313 for maintenance accomplished expended in FY 1986. with Navy funds. 13. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 3. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and 14. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition Coast Guard costs. survey costs since FY 1958. Includes $184,273 expended in 4. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition FY 1986. surveys. Includes $5,191 expended in FY 1986. 15. Includes $154,704 for new work for previous projects; 5. Excludes $4,238,752 required contributed funds; $86,352 public works funds; and $1,226,793 emergency relief $1,843,146 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance 6. Includes $88,153 for reconnaissance and condition channel in FY 1961 to depth of-42 feet mean lower low water surveys. Excludes $114,000 required contributed funds. (or 2 feet below project depth); $715,215 required contributed Includes $47,705 expended in FY 1986. funds; $1,900,063 other contributed funds, including $4,441 7. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 for betterments desired by local interests prior to modification required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. by 1968 River and Harbor Act; and Coast Guard costs. 8. Includes $125,646 for reconnaissance and condition 16. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous projets survey costs since FY 1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed and $200,972 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since funds. FY 1958. In addition, includes $144 for retroactive pay 9. Excludes $57,609 other contributed funds. Includes increase shown in "cost" figure only, as reported in 1958 $65,934 expended in FY 1986. Annual Report, page 1430. Excludes $270,696 for maintenance 10. Includes $61,068 for reconnaissance and condition accomplished with Navy funds. surveys.Includes $16,191 expended in FY 1986. 17. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes 11. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification $2,910,000 required contributed funds, both for new work on by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. flood control project, "San Diego River Basin, Calif." Excludes Includes $100,171 expended in FY 1986. $557,832 other contributed funds. 18. Includes $103,116 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, CA' Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA2 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, CA Completed Completed Completed 1967 1967 1972 $89,119 25,881 . 1,253,5944 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-D (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA Completed 1968 578,7175 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA 6 Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,4427 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,0008 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Active 1985 9,722,1009 Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,81910 & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of 6. Plant in service. part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered 7. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. Includes under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset $2,287 expended in FY 1986. and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 8. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 9. Excludes $4,615,866 for required contributed funds. section 103, Public Law 87-874. 10. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for beach- 3. Excludes $75,614 required contributed funds. nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. funds. TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville 7.1 C lt 1QQ 8 $nn 02- City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and 'Lake St. Clair) Completed Deferred Active (part) & Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed 400,0003 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 73,2014 31,778,2235 2,413,051 402,867 121,5094 10,218,9006 33-19 I ll L V 11G~ , vvmpieieu 17O * eu, vvV,vvv REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-E (Cont') OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Goleta, CA, and vicinity Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Needles, San Bernardino County, CA' Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA' Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA' South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA' Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA' Tijuana River Basin, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel Ventura River levee Whitewater River Basin, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County1' Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs' Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Active Completed Active Active Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed 1982 1950 1973 1970 1973 1972 1978 1982 1962 1961 1959 1985 1950 1961 1984 1983 1984 1985 1985 1979 1975 1964 1950 1966 1973 500,000 335,000 1,000,0007 1,000,0008 212,745 195,194 982,4329 1,708,437 1,438,27510 7,753,93711 617,89012 2,104,478 9,258,20713 67,361 2,126,672 10,079,85314 4,769,52115 3,999,99516 632,15817 840,88618 1,703,031'19 213,313 939,90820 1,349,63821 97,868 819,87822 33-20 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E (Cont') OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements Completed 1967 1,420,55223 Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 - Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 & Deferred (part) 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 13. Excludes $711,994 other contributed funds. Includes 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. $318 expended in FY 1986. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes 4. Advance planning only. $978 expended in FY 1986. 5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and 15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooper- $3,121,769 other contributed funds. Includes $174,336 ation items not required and $49,458 other contributed funds. expended in FY 1986. Includes $58,849 expended in FY 1986. 6. Includes $515 expended in FY 1986. 16. Excludes $559,516 required contributed funds. 7. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and 17. Includes $25,718 expended in FY 1986. $91,160 other contributed funds. 18. Includes $64,073 expended in FY 1986. 8. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and 19. International Boundary and Water Commission funds. $176,295 other contributed funds. 20. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and 21. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludes $154,733 other contributed funds. $17,006 other contributed funds. 10. Includes $301 expended in FY 1986. 22. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds and $53,470 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and other contributed funds. $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 23. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA 1958 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV 1964 1977 $295,191 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Villa Park Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 33-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 6 of Text) Project Date Channel Islands Harbor, CA August 1986 Dana Point Harbor, CA July 1986 Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA June 1986 San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA March 1986 TABLE 33-I LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 11 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 19761 Project Units Federal Local2 Total UNITS IN $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Compton Creek, Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain $2,510,500 - $2,510,500 Haines Canyon 524,000 - 524,000 Hansen Dam 11,343,000 - 11,343,000 Los Angeles River channel: Lankershim Blvd. to Steward and Gray Rd. 40,807,300 - 40,807,300 Los Angeles River channel, Long Beach Blvd. 34,200 - 34,200 Sepulveda Dam 6,657,000 - 6,657,000 Sycamore Wash 24,000 - 24,000 Verdugo Wash, Concord St. to upper Canada bridge 1,087,000 - 1,087,000 San Gabriel River Basin: San Gabriel River channel: San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam 810,800 - 810,800 Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work) 951,900 - 951,900 Santa Fe Dam to Walnut Creek 32,300 - 32,300 Santa Fe Dam 12,647,000 - 12,647,000 Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash 1,109,000 - 1,109,000 Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties 1,280,000 - 1,280,000 Subtotal 79,818,000 - 79,818,000 UNITS OUTSIDE $70 MILLION PROJECT Los Angeles River Basin: Blanchard Canyon 682,000 $476,000 1,158,000 Blue Gum Canyon 533,000 233,000 766,000 Burbank-Eastern system 7,149,000 1,850,000 8,999,000 Burbank-Western system (lower) 1,279,000 268,000 1,547,000 Burbank-Western system (upper) 4,930,000 2,959,000 7,889,000 Caballero Creek 1,484,200 493,000 1,977,200 Compton Creek: Los Angeles River to Hooper Ave. storm drain 149,000 - 149,000 Hooper Ave. storm drain to Main St. 1,052,000 457,000 1,509,000 Dead Horse Canyon and.Royal Blvd. channel 664,000 316,000 980,000 Lopez Canyon diversion. 743,500 665,000 1,408,500 Lopez Dam 729,000 - 729,000 Los Angeles River channel: Owensmouth Ave. to Lankershim Blvd. 8,135,800 4,247,000 12,382,800 Lankershim Blvd. to Stewart and Gray Rd. 9,202,100 - 9,202,100 Steward and Gray Rd. to Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge 5,860,900 81,000 5,941,900 Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean 32,612,000 9,173,000 41,785,000 Pacoima Wash channel 3,178,100 1,306,000 4,484,100 Tujunga Wash channel 7,322,900 2,557,000 9,879,900 33-22 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-I (Cont'd) LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FIRST COSTS FOR ALL UNITS OF IMPROVEMENT UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 11 of Text) Latest Approved Estimated Cost 1976' Project Units Federal Local2 Total Verdugo Wash, upper Canada bridge to debris basin 635,000 363,000 998,000 Wilson Canyon and Mansfield St. channel 3,917,500 857,000 4,774,500 Winery Canyon 413,000 265,000 678,000 San Gabriel River Basin: Coyote Creek (including North Fork) 18,802,300 8,426,000 27,228,300 Emerald Wash and Live Oak Wash 1,658,600 1,182,000 2,840,600 Marshall Creek 2,577,900 968,000 3,545,900 San Gabriel River channel: Santa Fe Dam to Whittier Narrows Dam 5,748,800 1,797,000 7,545,800 Whittier Narrows Dam to Pacific Ocean 20,887,200 3,108,000 23,995,200 Thompson Creek and San Jose Wash (including San Jose Creek) 21,274,600 6,095,000 27,369,600 Walnut Creek inlet channel 2,879,000 1,091,000 3,970,000 Walnut Creek system 17,232,600 8,715,000 25,947,600 Whittier Narrows Dam , 32,254,000 38,000 32,292,000 Rio Hondo Basin: Arcadia Wash system 5,236,800 1,893,000 7,129,800 Eaton Wash 4,225,100 1,194,000 5,419,100 Rio Hondo channel: Peck Rd. to Rosemead Blvd. (upper) 4,412,000 550,000 4,962,000 Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower) 8,165,000 2,565,000 10,730,000 Rubio Canyon diversion 1,066,400 254,000 1,320,400 Santa Anita Wash 3,045,700 434,000 3,479,700 Sawpit Wash 2,348,600 745,000 3,093,600 Sierra Madre Villa channel 781,400 366,000 1,147,400 Sierra Madre Wash 1,732,000 248,000 1,980,000 Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel 746,600 - 746,600 Benedict Canyon system 15,284,900 3,785,000 19,069,900 Centinela Creek 4,083,800 4,788,000 8,871,800 Sawtelle-Westwood system (including Sepulveda channel) 9,620,700 1,492,000 11,112,700 Subtotal 274,736,000 76,300,000 351,036,000 Grand total for comprehensive plan 354,554,000 76,300,000 430,854,000 1. Excludes estimated cost for Code 710 funds and estimated cost for minor rehabilitation. 2. Approved by Los Angeles County Flood Control District as of September 30, 1976, except for Walnut Creek system channel estimate, which was increased by $42,000 to permit rounding of overall non-Federal estimate to three significant figures. 33-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 33-J SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA: LATEST APPROVED ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST FOR ALL UNITS (See Section 16 of Text) Estimated Cost Project Total Latest Revision Date ACTIVE UNIT' Completed: Brea Dam $1,189,0682 3 Fullerton Dam 411,0762 3 Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements 7,612,000 3 Prado Dam 9,473,2732 3 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel 10,924,170 3 San Antonio Dam 7,001,1764 3 Completed Except for Minor Completion Items: Carbon Canyon Dam and channel 5,150,0002 1961 INACTIVE UNITS5 Aliso Creek Dam 340,000 1954 San Juan Dam 5,960,000 1954 Trabuco Dam 2,190,000 1954 DEAUTHORIZED UNIT Villa Park Dam 2,270,000 1954 1. For details, see section 16 of text. 2. Not including estimated cost of Code 710 funds. 3. Plant in service. 4. Includes $5,000 working funds. 5. For additional information, see "Other Authorized Flood Control Projects." TABLE 33-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Project Date Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Whitewater River Basin, CA September 1986 Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs, Whitewater River Basin, CA September 1986 Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, CA September 1986 Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA July 1986 San Diego River channel and levees, San Diego River Basin, CA July 1986 San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, CA September 1986 33-24 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 33-L (See Section 21 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Ephriam Canyon Wash, Nogales, AZ $13,659 Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, CA 84,573 Mission Zanja Creek, CA 86,468 Newhall Creek, Newhall, CA 4,672 Rialto Channel, Rialto, CA 81,940 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, CA 69,485 33-25 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation PagE 1. Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, CA ............... 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ...... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)......................... 34-2 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA ....................... 34-2 5. Santa Cruz Harbor, CA .............. 34-3 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................... 34-3 7. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ............................ 34-3 Flood Control 8. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........................ 34-3 9. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ......................... 34-3 e General Investigations 10. Surveys ............................... 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 12. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ........................ 13. Advance Engineering and Design....... Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table 34-D Table 34-E Table 34-F Table 34-G Cost and Financial Statement ................... Authorizing Legislation ........ Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........ Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ........ Page 34-4 34-4 34-4 34-4 34-5 34-8 34-8 34-9 34-9 Navigation 1. FISHERMAN'S WHARF AREA, SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA Location. Fisherman's Wharf is located on San Francisco Bay on the northern waterfront of the City of San Francisco, approximately 2-1/2 miles east of the Golden Gate Bridge. (See USGS Quad Sheet San Francisco North, Calif. N3745-W12222.5/7.5) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete sheet pile breakwater starting 150 feet to the west of Hyde Street Pier; curving around the end of Hyde Street Pier and extending in an easterly direction to an extension of the east fender line of Pier 45. The entrance is a 165-foot channel between the breakwater and the end of Pier 45. The total length of this sheet pile breakwater is 1,509 feet. In addition there are two segmented breakwaters (28-foot solid walls with 6-foot openings), one 150 feet long extending in a northerly direction in the abandoned slip at the end of Pier 45, and the second is a 250-foot section 250 feet from the bayward end of, and on the west side of Pier 45. Also included are two 10-foot wide caps which may be used as walkways for the purpose of recreational pier fishing. Access is constructed to the 150-foot segmented breakwater, and the second, included in Phase II construction, will be access to the 1,509-foot solid breakwater. The estimated total cost for the project is $9,600,000 of which $8,900,000 is Federal cost and $700,000 is non- Federal cost. Final Federal and non-Federal costs are now being determined. Construction contract was awarded in February 1985 to Riedel International, Inc. of Portland, OR. Total contract award was $7,887,000. Construction will be completed by October 1986. Local cooperation. The Agreement of Local Cooperation, along with estimated costs, has been negotiated 34-1 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT with, and accepted by, the local sponsor. The 221 Agreement was signed by the local sponsor on 13 November 1984. Terminal facilities. Project protects existing commercial and recreational waterfront structures: commercial fishing fleet and fish handling structures; recreational small craft harbor; and Hyde Street Pier used for historic ship berthing. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Complete construction. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County near the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay to the Port of Richmond. The channel is maintained at a depth of -35 feet MLLW, except at its terminus in the upper Santa Fe Channel where the depth decreases to -30 feet MLLW. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its depth. At Point Potrero, however, the channel flares into a turn and then continues at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe channel. A rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. Proposed improvements consists of a two-phased construction plan. Phase I would deepen the channel to -38 feet for bulk carriers, increase the minimum width to 600 feet and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 1,700,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to an ocean disposal site 30 miles from the Golden Gate. In addition, 2,600 cubic yards of rock are to be excavated and disposed of at the former Kaiser Shipyard site. Phase II would deepen the channel to -41 feet, provide a minimum width of 600 feet and enlarge the turning basin to 1,425 feet diameter. Approximately 3,900,000 cubic yards of sediment and 3,690 cubic yards of rock are to be excavated. The estimated cost of the project is $26,900,000. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Subsequent projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the City of Richmond which would share 25% of the project cost during construction and repay 10% over 30 years. The local sponsor would also provide a disposal area for rock. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses ten privately-owned terminals and six terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. Complete preconstruction planning and engineering. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to vicinity of Concord through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Concord to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Concord; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route; and widening the Suisun Bay Channel. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. For the approved cost estimate (1986) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doec. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, No. 31, revised 1982, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction and continued planning activities. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CA Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, California, Study authorized by the River 34-2 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81-516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1986, was $12,702,538, of which $5,351,442 was for the regional visitor center, $888,372 for exhibits, and $6,462,724 for maintenance. 5. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CA Location. Santa Cruz Harbor is located on the northernmost part of Monterey Bay, near the southeastern boundary of the City of Santa Cruz. Existing project. Adopted by Act of July 3, 1958. Provided for construction of jetties, 850 feet (south jetty) and 1,125 feet long. The entrance channel is 100 feet wide, 20 feet deep, and.900 feet long, with an additional 370 feet at a depth of 15 feet. The inner harbor channel is 15 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 800 feet long, with an additional 600 feet, 10 feet deep. The turning basin is 300 feet wide, 207 feet long and 10 feet in depth. Project authorization also provided for a sand bypassing plant, if required. A cooperative agreement finalized in April 1986, provides the Santa Cruz Port District with a bypass system to be used in Santa Cruz HarboF. The primary component of the system is a 16 inch hydraulic dredge. The federal government shared in the cost of the dredge system in return for the Port District assuming full responsibility for channel maintenance for the remaining life of the authorized project. The Port District will assume responsibility of maintenance dredging upon delivery of the dredge system in October-November 1986. Local cooperation. See above concerning the Cooperative Agreement for the dredge system. Terminal facilities. N/A Operations during fiscal year. Procurement of dredge system. The Port District will assume responsibility for maintenance of the harbor during FY 87. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than FY 86 were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Crescent City Harbor; Moss Landing Harbor; Napa River; Petaluma River; Redwood City Harbor; Richardson Bay Channel; San Leandro Marina; San Rafael Creek; Suisun Bay Channel; and Suisun Channel, all in California. Fiscal year cost was $267,932. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $30,335 for Larkspur Ferry, Marin County, CA. 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $214,809. Total cost to September 30, 1986 was $1,184,203. Projects inspected included Alameda Creek, March 1986; Butte Creek, August 1986; Canyon Creek, August 1986; Coffee Creek, August 1986; Colma Creek, May 1986; Corte Madera Creek, April 1986; Coyote Creek, April 1986; East Weaver Creek, August 1986; Eel River at Sandy Prairie, May 1986; Klamath River, April 1986; Mad River at Blue Lake, April 1986; Mark West Creek, July 1986; Meiss Lake, August 1986; Pajaro River, April 1986; Pinole Creek, March 1986; Redwood Creek, May 1986; Rheem Creek, March 1986; Rodeo Creek, March 1986; Russian River, August 1986; Salinas River, June 1986; San Leandro Creek, March 1986; San Lorenzo Creek, March 1986; San Lorenzo River, January 1986; Santa Rosa Creek, July 1986; Smith River, April 1986; Sonoma Creek, July 1986; Van Duzen River, June 1986 and Wildcat Creek, July 1986. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $137,402 for preauthorization studies of which $1,708 was for Papermill Creek, Point Reyes, CA; $37,488 for Pescadero and Butano Creeks, 34-3 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT CA; $62,300 for Rohner Creek, Fortuna, CA; $19,037 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; and $16,869 for Soquel Creek, Santa Cruz County, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $103,477 were incurred for emergency flood control activities, of which $185,641 was for disaster preparedness; $14,151 for emergency operations; and -$96,315 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $38,077 for emergency bank protection of which $3,085 was for Emeryville and Frontage Road, CA; $444 for Emeryville, Alameda, CA; $17,153 for Marina County WWTP, CA; $120 for Richardson Bay, Belvedere, CA; $42 for River Road, Monterey County, CA; -$2,851 for San Francisquito Creek, Site 74, CA; $20,084 for Willow County, Water District Wells, Mendocino, CA. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,058,716, of which $184,824 was for navigation; $815,150 for flood damage prevention; $53,427 for inventory of dams; and $5,315 for coordination with other agencies. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $37,500 were incurred, of which $35,459 was for flood plain management service program and $2,041 was for hydrologic studies. 12. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Fiscal year total costs were $731,243 of which $298 was for Fisherman's Wharf, CA, $176,839 for Oakland Inner Harbor, CA; $138,609 for Oakland Outer Harbor (Deepening), CA, and $415,597 for Richmond Harbor, (Deepening), CA. 13. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources'Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide'protection. The 1976 WRDA authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences iri the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plans df improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA, provide for one or two breakwaters immediately west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,560,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $12,353 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 65 percent complete. Model studies, using a physical model to test alternative plans, were initiated in FY 84 and completed in FY 86. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA, provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $71 with General Investigation funds. 34-4 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 34-A See Section in Text Project Bodega Bay, CA Crescent City Harbor, CA 1. Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, CA Halfmoon Bay, CA Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA Oakland Harbor, CA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 -- - - 1,226,765' 2 99,249 4,314 - - 1,226,7651 3 - 16,270 204,651 67,210 1,082,5254 - 16,270 179,999 82,427 1,073,0904 -- - - 397,7795 - - - 397,7796 802,000 - -44,000 - 9,454,9726 419,303 850,808 11,409 1,993 9,454,9726 2,875,300 230,000 1,093,278 5.110,486 18,487,7387 645,408 2,333,215 1,657,383 5,004,776 18,371,0037 -- - - 525,0008 -- - - 525,0008 - 350,000 3,000,000 5,265,000 8,615,00041 - 180,543 1,138,269 7,151,055 8,289,86741 - - - 6,697,39643 44 -- - - 6,697,39643 44 - - 271,000 10,000 2,088,06743 44 - - 241,765 36,818 2,085,61144 ' - - - 9,847,2994�0 -- - - 9,847,2999 40 8,562,200 1,475,009 6,107,060 4,236,000 53,933,94110 40 2,683,029 6,304,195 6,983,429 4,414,387 53,894,2261o 40 -- - - 338,21511 40 - - - 338,21511 40 59,000 448,000 161,583 36,570 3,966,78412 40 47,971 427,295 164,383 52,051 3,951,36512 40 - - - 1,021,274'3 40 -- - - 1,021,27413 40 72,000 38,254 -426 26,583 1,840,22013 14 40 240,156 43,816 -426 26,583 1,840,22013 14 40 79,000 275,000 - - 1,521,482's 16 181,133 156,999 115,747 12,423 1,520,654's 17 826,900 530,000 405,000 598,000 6,253,65418 19 314,635 991,649 470,898 534,352 6,183,59418 19 - - - 222,81020 40 - - - 222,81020 40 ... 9,646,98421 40 ... 9,646,98421 40 1,796,000 1,294,000 1,325,973 1,075,000 28,717,24622 40 1,771,880 1,251,503 1,414,766 1,060,589 28,689,11022 40 34-5 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 Petaluma River, CA Redwood City Harbor, CA 2. Richmond Harbor, CA 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA San Francisco Harbor, CA San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Removal of Drift) San Leandro Marina, CA San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA San Rafael, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 297,14623 40 297,14623 40 670,000 1,025,407 912,547 1,797,546 26,272 -168,185 7,813,65324 40 446,628 -115,226 7,811,95424 40 - - 1,672,72225 40 - - 1,672,72225 40 44,000 3,079,000 -588,465 14,674 61,044 2,868,440 -374,925 14,674 -- 15,000 370,000 - - 345,184 1,650,000 2,047,000 601,226 1,074,000 493,783 2,663,006 1,136,050 1,097,818 7,340,62826 40 7,340,628 40 3,271,69527 28 3,231,87927 28 16,572,342" 16,561,69129 - - - 164,689 - - - 164,689 432,000 1,200,000 10,580,000 5,166,000 24,288,200 467,014 628,744 10,246,428 5,877,031 23,794,281 1,782,000 1,141,000 1,159,000 1,100,000 1,530,770 1,400,852 1,089,231 1,067,138 12,882,700 12,702,540 -.- - - 2,689,35628 30 - - - 2,689,3562 30 1,401,000 424,860 2,087,500 1,566,340 22,489,24531 1,409,397 478,865 2,042,272 1,726,548 22,465,29031 -- - - - 40 -- - - - 40 1,073,000 1,143,000 1,018,000 930,000 20,976,18240 1,075,404 1,040,828 1,010,551 1,047,460 20,835,71440 - 410,176 147,205 44,171 1,245,90332 45 274,097 261,171 66,284 1,245,90332 - - - 1,369,3722 33 - - - 1,369,3722 33 1,465,000 3,696,143 1,725,125 1,939,000 1,841,748 3,615,383 1,996,024 1,978,259 32,311,70134 32,309,7123 32,35940 47 32.35940 47 26,924 26,924 8,545 970,994 2,988,36440 46 8,545 932,781 2,950,15140 46 34-6 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 34-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 5. Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - - 120,000 2,134,000 4,106,340 (Federal Funds) Cost - - 94,699 1,960,377 3,907,416 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 160,000 Cost - - - - 160,000O Maint. Approp. 742,000 659,000 834,000 994,500 9,474,659 Cost 566,161 769,335 935,374 1,035,571 9,465,027 Suisun Bay Channel, New Work CA Approp. - - - - - Cost - - - - - Maint. Approp. 594,000 312,000 204,725 1,797 2,761,860 37 Cost 782,935 305,091 204,887 8,568 2,758,974 s7 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677w Cost - - - - 217,677" Maint. Approp. -32,000 15,130 651 51,594 1,403,332" Cost 94,431 15,130 651 51,594 1,403,332" 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $584,563 Preconstruction Planning costs ($455,563 Construction, General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $147,975 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 5. Excludes contributed funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $75,795 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956- 1986. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royaltyfree rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,710 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $67,265 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $268,096 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $1,223,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($773,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $273,000 under General Investigations); ($450,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $285,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $1,222,172 Preconstruction cost ($772,172 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $272,172 under General Investigations); ($450,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 under Construction, General and $285,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $15,436 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $774 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $122,402 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. Excludes contributed funds of $178,308. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $106,368 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,364 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes 134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes 193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $23,659 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $101,103 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1986. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $746,947. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $2,272 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 34-7 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for details. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco DistrictJanuary 1,1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $11,610 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1986. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $95,823 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1986. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $443,953. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $17,567 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1986. 46. Includes $138,417 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1986. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. FISHERMAN'S WHARF AREA-SAN FRANCISCO CA Nov. 14, 1983 Breakwater. Cont. Res. (H.J. Res. 413) of 1984, Public Law 98-151, 98th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA' Completed 1966 155,5502 - Berkeley Marina, CA' Completed 1979 505,2013 - Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Inactive 1935 - - Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,1824 85,880b San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA' Completed 1974 180,4726 - San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CAx Completed 1976 848,2277 - San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA' Completed 1976 210,3908 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645). 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive 1974. 5. Includes $8,041 for reconnaissance and condition surveys for FY 1956-1986. 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and excludes contributed funds $153,618. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and excludes contributed funds $138,189. 34-8 TABLE 34-D REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Project Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Operation and Construction Maintenance Humboldt Bay, CA Inactive 1958 2,000 Santa Cruz County, CA Inactive 1966 245,639 TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - 34-9 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ................... 35-1 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ........................ 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) .......................... 35-2 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................... 35-3 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA .................. 35-4 6. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ............................... 35-4 7. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............... 35-5 8. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........... 9. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA .......... ,.................. 35-6 10. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ............ 35-7 11. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA ..... 35-8 12. Little Dell Lake, UT ................... 13. Lower San Joaquin River, CA ......... 35-9 14. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ............................. 35-9 15. Merced County Streams, CA.............. 16. Merced County Stream Group, CA ......... 35-10 17. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ...................................... 35-10 18. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA ........................... 35-11 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 19. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ...... 35-12 20. Walnut Creek, CA ........................ 35-14 21. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ...... 35-15 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 35-15 23. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization........................... 35-16 24. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations............................... 35-16 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 25. New Melones Lake, CA ................... 35-16 General Investigations 26. Surveys ................................. 35-18 27. Collection and Study of'Basic Data ........ 35-18 28. Research and Development ............... 35-18 29. Advance Engineering and Design........ 35-19 30. Other Work under Special Authority ...... 35-20 Tables Table 35-A Cost and Financial Table 35-B Table 35-C Table 35-D Table 35-E Table 35-F Table 35-G Statement ................... 35-21 Authorizing Legislation ..................... 35-26 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........... 35-28 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. 35-29 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects .......... 35-31 35-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provides for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and:Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973) of new work for shallow-draft river channel is $1,360,000 (includes $1,163,000 for deferred portion between Colusa and Chico Landing). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallowdraft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Minor maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items consisted of: Maintenance dredging on Sacramento River, vicinity of Rio Vista by suction dredge initiated by contract, $1,448,128. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallowdraft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallowdraft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel 250 to 350 feet as necessary. Selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, authority to construct a submerged sill, 45 acres of land for establishment of wetland habitat, and 156 acres of land for upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1986) is $74,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $40,100,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $600,000; and non-Federal cost of $34,000,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($13,600,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $13,600,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. General Design Memorandum combined with Environmental Impact Statement was submitted in April 1986, final comments incorporated and General Design Memorandum resubmitted. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) -Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or lowlying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetmenton waterside of levees bordering channels. Project estimate (October 1986) is $172,657,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $132,000,000, including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,100,000; and non-Federal cost of $39,557,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($1,007,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local i.nterests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoildisposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and, embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must-also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $1,007,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon- Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise im- 35-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 proving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreation development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter ofOctober 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. Channel improvement--dredging of various reaches between McDonald Tract and Avon was initiated by Contract No. 4 at fiscal year contract cost of $5,413,916. Dredging Jersey Island to New York Slough was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $122,200. San Francisco District: Continued planning activities. Channel improvement: A dredging contract for Richmond Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, Contra Costa County, (awarded in August 1985) was initiated and completed at fiscal year cost of $4,351,230. A second dredging contract for Richmond Long Wharf Maneuvering Area was awarded September 17, 1986. No fiscal year costs. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 32 percent complete. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne accessto city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassified and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (Johi F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Stone protection maintenance on Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $60,000. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H. V. EASTMAN LAKE; CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205- foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irriga- 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT tion service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H. V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 131,200 acre-feet occurred May 17, 1986. Maximum inflow to reservoir was 15,000 cubic feet per second on February 18,1986. Maximum release of 450 cubic feet per second on April 4, 1986, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 30,400 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $6,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances were combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothillsg, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non- Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $2,737,252 through December 31, 1985. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During the rainflood season, maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 3,000 cubic feet per second February 19, 1986. This flow was all local, gates were closed at Farmington Dam. Maximum storage in reservoir was 48,200 acre-feet on February 19, 1986, and maximum 35-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 inflow to reservoir was 24,000 cubic feet per second on February 19, 1986. Project prevented an estimated $15,000,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Construction of a boathouse was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $42,679. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 254,200 acre-feet occurred February 20, 1986. Maximum inflow to reservoir was 35,000 cubic feet per second on February 19, 1986. Maximum release of 7,130 cubic feet per second on February 22, 1986, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 178,800 acre-feet was released for flood control and 85,800 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $14,000,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 7. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and discharge into west side of San Francisco Bay at a point about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provides for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Approved estimated cost for new work (October 1986) is $21,400,000, of which $12,700,000 is Federal cost and $8,700,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $650,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $650,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8,1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Acquisition of rights-of-way and dredge material disposal areas, relocations and construction for remaining work is being held in abeyance as a result of a request from Congress for a review of alternatives other than completing the project as an open concrete channel. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 on August 21, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Redredging Lower Corte Madera Creek channel was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $1,321,429. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 75 percent complete cotsidering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Frances Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design and construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. 8. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be construction. Estimated cost (October 1986) for existing project is $21,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $10,500,000 is Federal and $10,500,000 is non- Federal. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985. (HD 91- 159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project, pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $320,000, of which $120,000 is for lands and $200,000 is cash contribution; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and. replacement of recreation facilities and flood control facilities. Ultimate non-Federal cost for flood control will be reduced by a Federal reimbursement of one-half of the non-Federal costs in excess of the Federal construction costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15, 1977, due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of $6,800,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non- Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction contract for McCoy Creek and Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was awarded in September 1986. Historical summary. Construction contract for enlarging McCoy Creek and constructing Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was awarded on September 30, 1986. 9. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163- foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake 35-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Erosion repair on downstream face of the dam was completed. Runoff of Fresno River above Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 67,100 acre-feet occurred May 18, 1986. Maximum inflow to reservoir was 9,800 cubic feet per second on February 18, 1986. Maximum release of 3,230 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1986, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 77,100 acre-feet was released for flood control and 57,300 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $41,800,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 10. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Californiaofficially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, -based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co.'($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982 the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1986, amounted to $1,709,168. 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Fiscal year contract costs for major items of work included: Initiation of Eastside recreation area renovation, $299,000; completion of Paradise Cove recreation area renovation; and completion of road paving at miscellaneous recreation areas, Phase II, $85,157. Dam safety assurance studies at Isabella Dam were continued at a fiscal year cost of $51,898. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Lake was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 562,100 acre-feet occurred June 16, 1986. Maximum daily inflow to the reservoir was 14,000 cubic feet per second on February 19,1986, and maximum outflow of 4,550 cubic feet per second occurred June 3, 1986. During the year, 215,900 acrefeet was released for flood control and 970,700 acre-feet was released for irrigation. Project prevented an estimated $6,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods and May-July 1986 snowmelt. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 11. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 197&. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and waterright holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1985: Terminus, $1,611,455 and Success, $749,402. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10,1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game 35-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council, developing a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds, None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $141,516. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 142,700 acre-feet occurred on June 18, 1986. Maximum inflow to the reservoir on February 13,1986, was about 20,000 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 3,290 cubic feet per second occurred March 14, 1986. Water released for flood control amounted to 273,900 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases totaled 534,000 acrefeet. Project prevented an estimated $8,000,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods and May-July 1986 snowmelt runoff. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $143,604. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above the reservoir was above normal during the year. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 7,000 cubic feet per second on February 19, 1986, and maximum outflow of 1,760 cubic feet per second occurred on March 14, 1986, Maximum storage of 82,300 acre-feet occurred on July 9, 1986. Water released for flood control amounted to 110,700 acre-feet and irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 121,300 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $2,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods and May-July 1986 snowmelt runoff. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968 except for final settlement for one tract of land upon decision of pending court case. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 12. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22,1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project will include an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acrefoot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (October 1986) is $49,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $28,300,000 is Federal and $20,900,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $15,220,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88), August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $15,220,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1896. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities included initiation of studies for Outlet Works Design Memorandum, initiation of studies for Embankment and Spillway Design Memorandum, and initiation and essential completion of embankment and foundation exploration program. Plans and specifications for redesign of Highway 65 realignment and relocation were completed by the Utah Department of Transportation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1986 making this project eligible for a new construction start. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. 13. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from city of Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of Fresno). Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to provide clearing and snagging on the San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam. Estimated first cost (October 1986) is $6,000,000, of which $5,000,000 is Federal and $1,000,000 is non- Federal for lands and damages (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). Existing project was included in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that the project for flood protection on the Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1984, as amended, is hereby further modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on the San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a written agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coordination with local interests and pertinent agencies and redraft of a combined Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement were continued at a fiscal year cost of $415,547. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984, has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract, dredging Eastside Bypass, was awarded October 12, 1984 and completed in May 1985. 14. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Drainage control system modification at Martis Creek Dam was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $150,042. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 6,800 acrefeet occurred on June 3, 1986. Maximum inflow to the reservoir on February 17, 1986, was about 1,260 cubic feet per second and maximum outflow of 664 cubic feet per second occurred February 28, 1986. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 15. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 16, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs 35-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 - Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs - Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control oinly; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated project cost (October 1986) is $92,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $62,000,000 is Federal and $30,200,000 is non-Federal Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $215,000, of which $175,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $2,880,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. 16. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was below normal for the year. (See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for projects.) Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Project prevented an estimated $8,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1984, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1984. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and streamgaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 17. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $12,686,828 for irrigation services through December 31, 1985. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22,1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires-one each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85- acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to date of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoortype powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 1,002,500 acre-feet occurred on June 27, 1986. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 35,000 cubic feet per second on February 18, 1986, and maximum outflow of 12,060 cubic feet per second occurred on June 4, 1986. During the year, 1,592,000 acre-feet was released for 35-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 flood control and 1,197,100 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Project prevented an estimated $29,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods and May-July 1986 snowmelt runoff. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $105,587. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 18. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Actof 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $99,400,000) and the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $358,400. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $74,900. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization. of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities included initiating plans and specifications for the Yorty Creek Beach area; and essentially completing plans and specifications for upgrading Rockpile Road. Major items of contract work included: Functional completion of boundary fencing, Phase I, $387,213; functional completion of boat launching facilities, Phase II, $1,327,074; initiation of administration building modifications, $1,095,281; and initiation of Buzzard Rock camping area, $2,978,502. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Spillway restoration was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $799,000. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork at Russian River was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 114,300 acre-feet occurred on February 18, 1986. Maximum inflow to reservoir was 12,000 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1986. Maximum release of 6,400 cubic feet per second occurred on February 18, 1986. During the year, 179,100 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 131,000 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $500,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $85,455. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 264,300 acre-feet occurred March 11, 1986. Maximum inflow to reservoir was 23,000 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1986. Maximum release of 2,600 cubic feet per second occurred March 15, 1986. During the year, 71,300 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 53,700 acre-feet was released for irrigation 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT and other purposes. Project prevented an estimated $13,200,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 94 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, and boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Major items of work remaining include upgrading Rockpile Road, minimal recreation facilities, boat ramp and administration facilities, and vegetation management program with remaining boundary fencing. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 19. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1986), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1986) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,800,000, of which $30,000,000 is Federal cost and $1,800,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1986) first cost for project is $132,600,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $92,300,000 is Federal (including $2,845,000 for recreation facilities) and $40,300,000 non-Federal comprising for lands and damages including relocations and $20,300,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also 35-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1986) at $20,300,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries - Engineering activities continued. Contract No. 10 for bypass levee revetment on Yolo Bypass was awarded August 12, 1986, and construction was initiated at fiscal year cost of $69,999. Project prevented an estimated $3,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) Project prevented an estimated $800,000,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. California State Reclamation Board in cooperation with the Corps, constructed a demonstration project of the Palisades bank protection system at Woodson Bridge State Park within the project reach. Construction was completed in August 1986 at a fiscal year Corps cost of $250,000 and hopefully will have less environmental impact than the conventional placement of riprap. Project prevented an estimated $1,800,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $34,324. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was well above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 168,900 acre-feet occurred February 18, 1986. Spillway flow occurred on February 17, 1986, and continued through February 20, 1986, with maximum depth of 5.4 feet and 3,900 cubic-feet per second. Maximum daily inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 47,000 cubic feet per second on February 17, 1986, and maximum outflow of 24,940 cubic feet per second occurred on February 18,1986. Releases of water for irrigation totaled 134,800 acre-feet and flood control releases totaled 615,800 acre-feet. Project prevented an estimated $5,500,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 80 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County-one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 20. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (1986) is $88,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $63,700,000 is Federal cost and $25,100,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,000,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,100,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1986) at $5,100,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. To date, $3,338,247 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and upper Pine Creek is continuing. Construction on San Ramon Bypass Channel has been split into three contracts. Contract No. 1 was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $2,126,445 and Contract No. 2 was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $399,999. Project prevented an estimated $12,500,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 82 percent complete. Total of 16.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Planning and design continued on remaining reaches. Work remaining consists of channel improvement on Walnut Creek and San Ramon bypass (Ygnacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road along SPRR alignment) and upper Pine Creek. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 21. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of 15,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 9,600 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Plan would also create a linear park environment with picnic facilities, comfort stations, full environment treatment, and a two-mile segment of trail to connect with other regional park trails in the vicinity. Approved estimated cost of new work (1986) is $33,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $19,200,000 is Federal cost, and $14,000,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,700,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). 35-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and operation of the project, including disposal areas, and adhere to requirements of sec. 210 of the 1970 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, Public Law 91-646; (b) modify or relocate all utilities and bridges (except railroad) necessary for construction and maintenance of the project with such modifications and replacements being in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, and replace vehicular traffic facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, curbs, gutters, and signs affected by the project; (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the project after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment of the flood channels that may result in decreasing the effectiveness of the project; (d) maintain, operate, and replace recreation facilities; (e) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; (f) adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; (g) make a cash contribution prior to start of construction for that portion of the cost of recreation lands and recreational facilities; (h) assure access to all persons on equal terms for approved recreational use; (i) at least annually inform affected interests regarding the limitations of protection afforded by the project; and (j) publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain, and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73- 466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of project costs for a modified plan of improvement. Prior to construction, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County will be required to furnish assurances to comply with sec. 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and sec. 77 of the 1974 Flood Control Act and to furnish assurance that in the acquisition of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way they will comply with requirements of sec. 210 of the 1970 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Estate Acquisition Policy Act, Public Law 91-646. A letter of intent to sign sec. 221 agreement was furnished by local sponsor on April 23, 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. In October 1983, work was resumed by Sacramento District on the project. A general design memorandum and an environmental impact statement were completed. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1986. Historical summary. Project has been inactive since 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. In October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a general design memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and aftecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24,1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $572,070 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($390,327). 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were as follows: $45,105 for Fourteenmile Slough, CA; $5,069 for Papermill Creek, CA; and $18,304 for Bear River, Smith Fork, Cokeville, WY. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $4,462,397, of which $199,477 was for disaster preparedness, $2,906,501 for flood emergency operations, $1,333,291 for repair and restoration, and $23,128 for advance measures. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). No emergency bank protection activities this fiscal year. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, three flood insurance studies were initiated and two flood insurance studies were completed in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-E-1153 and EMW-E- 2226 at a fiscal year cost of $218,665 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 24. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, and Vallecito, CO; and Navajo, NM reservoirs were prepared. Work was continued on the Blue Mesa water control manual. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $285,755. Total cost to September 30, 1986, $2,952,911. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 25. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1986) Federal cost is $385,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91- 282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially 35-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued including continuation of plans and specifications for the Lower Stanislaus recreation areas, minimal recreation facilities only. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $427,195; completion of Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities, Phase II contract, $106,050; final completion of Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities; $27,951; initiation of McHenry recreation area contract, $500,000, and completion of Lower Stanislaus Phase II minimal recreation facilities (including Knights Ferry and Horseshoe Bar recreation areas), $155,567, Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Project prevented an estimated $102,500,000 in damages from the February-March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. A boundary fencing contract, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities contract, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard contract, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contract have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. McHenry recreation area contract has been initiated. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements with local interests. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits are being attained. Project is about 98 percent complete. General Investigations 26. Surveys Fiscal year costs were $2,103,028, of which $1,948,128 was for flood damage prevention studies; $5,000 for coordination with Soil Conservation Service; $14,000 for coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984); $82,000 for special investigations; $30,000 review of FERC licenses; and $23,900 for planning assistance to states ($19,900, CA; and $4,000, CO). MORRISON CREEK STREAM GROUP, CA (PHASE I, STUDY) Phase I studies (estimated cost $3,000,000) were authorized by sec. 101(a), Water Resources Development Act, of 1976, in accordance with Report of Chief of Engineers, March 2, 1976. Proposed plan of improvement would be located on streams in Morrison Creek Stream Group Basin in the central part of Sacramento County and would provide for construction of a dam with an 11,000 acre-foot reservoir at the Vineyard site on Elder and Laguna Creeks, diversion of Morrison Creek flows into this reservoir, construction of 26 miles of levee and 66 miles of channel work along streams in the basin, and purchase of lands and related construction for a 7,800-acre flood retardation basin in the Beach- Stone Lakes area. Draft of Phase I General Design Memorandum was completed September 30; 1986, at a fiscal year cost of $120,249. City and County of Sacramento intend to construct channel portion of plan. Corps will pursue the flood control alternatives in 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Beach-Stone Lakes area under the Small Flood Control Project authority. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake-widening and/or deepening 3.3 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, constructing a 1.1 mile long bypass channel around the highly developed area adjacent to existing channel, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek--enlarging existing perimeter levees of Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, purchasing in fee 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishing a wildlife refuge and nonstructural measures. Preconstruction planning estimate is $3,000,000. Continuation of planning and engineering, including a sedimentation study for Upper Basin and separate General Design Memorandums for the Clear Lake Outlet Channel (Upper Basin) and Cache Creek Settling Basin (Lower Basin) without wildlife refuge was continued at a fiscal year cost of $375,436. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Project is located in the downtown area of San Jose in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement includes widening and deepening of one or both sides of Guadalupe River for 3.5 miles and the construction of an underground concrete channel bypass conduit 2,900 feet long to provide flood protection to downtown San Jose, including approximately 550 commercial businesses, 2,400 private residences, 4 major traffic arteries, and the San Jose International Airport. Plan also includes fish and wildlife mitigation measures, would preserve to the greatest degree possible the existing riparian vegetation along Guadalupe River, and would also enhance the redevelopment potential of the downtown San Jose area. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,000,000. Feasibility Report passed the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors June 29, 1986 and is currently under consideration by the Chief of Engineers. Continuation of planning and engineering was initiated at fiscal year cost of $16,822. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Project is located northeast of Fresno-Clovis metropolitan area in Fresno County, CA. Plan of improvement includes flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a flood control reservoir on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreation opportunities. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,545,000. General Design Memorandum was completed (approved June 11, 1986); Concrete Materials Design Memorandum was completed (approved July 17, 1986); three Site Geology Design Memorandums on Big Dry Creek, Fancher Creek, as well as on three detention basins (Pup Creek, Alluvial Drain and Redbank Creek) were completed (all approved August 20, 1986); and draft of Detention Basins Feature Design Memorandum was completed in August 1986 at a fiscal year cost of $813,805. 27. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year cost of $368,059. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $8,000. 28. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10,1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,186,567, of which $152,995 was for planning methodologies, $622,960 was for analytical techniques, $133,537 for Water Conservation and Supply, $194,214 for risk assessment for Corps dams and $82,861 for earth resources satellites, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 29. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA Project will be located on main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek on eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of Trinity Range between cities of Redding and Red Bluff, CA, and was authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Plan of improvement provides for two multiplepurpose reservoirs, one at Dutch Gulch (capacity 900,000 35-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 acre-feet) and one at Tehama (capacity 700,000 acrefeet), and includes base facilities for future installation of hydropower generating equipment. General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement were completed in FY 1984. Advance Engineering and Design activities were essentially discontinued in FY 1985 as by letter of June 25, 1985, the State of California indicated they could not financially participate in the project at this time. Final documentation of record of the Advance Engineering and Design studies was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $17,510. PAJARO RIVER BASIN, CA Pajaro River and tributaries drain an area of 1,300 square miles in the Coast Range and empty into Monterey Bay about 75 miles south of San Francisco. Pajaro Valley sub-basin in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties includes 112 square miles in lower 13 miles of Pajaro River. Plan of improvement consists of construction of a variable setback levee beginning approximately 1,000 feet upstream of Miller Avenue and ending 2,000 feet below Thomas Road Bridge on north side of Uvas Creek. Phase I General Design Memorandum with Environmental Impact Statement was completed by San Francisco District in FY 1982. A Post Authorization Change was approved by the Office of Chief of Engineers on August 4, 1982. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications and construction was transferred to the Sacramento District in April 1982. Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved as basis for continued preconstruction planning as a combined General Design Memorandum. Combined General Design Memorandum was completed in November 1984 and approved on June 17, 1985. Record of Decision was signed on June 20, 1985. Plans and specifications for levee improvement and construction of recreation trails were approved in September 1985. Draft of a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was sent to the Santa Clara Valley Water District and reviewed by them in May 1986. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. 30. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY Under the Aquatic Plant Control Program (River and Harbor Act of 1965, sec. 302, Public Law 289, 89th Congress) a State Design Memorandum and an environmental assessment regarding the waterhyacinth problem in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA, were completed by the Corps in FY 1985. The Calif Department of Boating and Waterways had requested assistance from the Corps on September 28, 1981, to find a solution to the waterhyacinth problems in the Delta. In a meeting on May 28, 1985, the Department of Boating and Waterways notified the Corps that the State control program had reduced the problem to a maintenance problem, that State funding is adequate to operate the current waterhyacinth maintenance program, and that Federal assistance is not needed at this time. State control program included chemicals to eliminate the immediate problem and biological control agents to provide long term control. Cost sharing agreement (70 percent Federal-30 percent State) was not applicable to preparation of State Design Memorandum nor the environmental assessment. Waterways Experiment Station (WES) has initiated a research study at an estimated cost of $60,000 to identify extent of waterhyacinth infestation in the Delta and Central Valley of California and to identify pathogens to control such infestation. Research report is to assist Sacramento District with its waterhyacinth problem and is scheduled for completion by mid FY 1987. Total Federal cost as of September 30, 1986, was $93,301. 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 1. Sacramento River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Sacramento River New Work Deep Water Ship Approp. Channel, CA Cost 3. San Francisco Bay New Work to Stockton, CA Approp. (John F. Baldwin and Cost Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Joaquin River, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. New Work Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 6. Calaveras River and New Work Littlejohn Creek and Approp. Tributaries including Cost ew Hogan Lake and Maint. Farminton Dam, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 7. Corte Madera Creek, CA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Required Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 8. Fairfield Vicinity New Work Streams, CA Approp. Cost 9. Hidden Dam-Hensley New Work Lake, Fresno Approp. River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 1,514,000 618,949 600,000 599,416 6,700,000 3,890,097 943,000 892,679 33 830,000 766,878 945,000 923,280 10,000 2,248 35,000 34,868 - - - 40,331,1921 - - - 40,331,1921 856,000 1,835,000 1,807,800 38,923,6312 2,025,601 1,892,496 1,841,271 38,907,030 s 650,000 65,000 800,000 2,340,000 295,317 372,326 649,054 2,130,522 3,680,000 13,580,000 12,513,000 47,456,0004 4,314,658 14,903,051 12,140,776 45,804,7035 850,000 898,753 804,000 889,621 - - 5,833,1176 - - 5,833,1176 625,000 20,000 11,947,4767 565,138 80,224 11,944,8067 - - 27,369,597 - - 27,369,597 819,000 853,000 6,726,500 861,266 870,983 6,669,885 - - 111,1878 - - 111,1878 - - 23,723,1449 - - 23,723,1449 1,074,000 1,563,000 1,124,000 13,142,16910 1,093,472 1,551,672 1,132,703 13,013,47410 30,000 40,000 20,000 1,394,25111 12 13 24,440 43,920 26,468 1,391,32711 12 14 325,000 525,000 2,374,000 10,258,725 xs 281,271 390,052 1,602,532 9,308,44915 - 110,000 -50,000 166,09516 17 - 5,156 41,977 148,45717 - - 270,000 806,92118 - - 121,420 658,341'19 320,000 155,000 905,000 2,067,000 282,442 176,886 285,206 1,431,535 - - - 30,555,426 - - - 30,555,426 510,000 773,000 969,000 874,000 7,858,500 742,736 855,484 940,029 897,340 7,803,550 - - - 165,11220 - - - 165,11220 35-23 1 1 l REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 10. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 11 Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Contributed Funds, her) 12. Little Dell Lake, UT 13. Lower San Joaquin River, CA 14. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 15. Merced County Streams, CA 16. Merced County Stream Group, CA 17. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, her) 18. Russian River Basin, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - - 24,450,53721 22 - - - - 24,450,53721 22 2,227,400 1,773,000 3,450,000 2,426,000 23,439,99823 24 1,924,520 1,920,956 3,633,385 2,519,690 23,322,71822 24 - - - - 438,00025 - - - - 438,00026 - - - - 34,997,230w - - - - 34,997,230w 1,850,000 1,524,000 1,652,000 1,893,000 20,973,52527 1,660,695 1,758,899 1,623,969 1,918,526 20,839,1262 - - 20,000 135,000 197,4202 29 31 - - 3,364 80,405 126,18922 30 32 50,000 515,000 90,000 1,335,000 4,144,900 12,430 143,472 358,810 1,274,320 3,931,502 - 350,000 2,300,000 448,000 3,098,000 - 311,799 2,259,644 415,547 2,986,990 - - - - 8,504,9893 - - - - 8,504,9893 243,000 242,000 1,069,000 252,000 3,698,350 165,188 300,768 947,669 359,725 3,654,454 500,000 - 20,000 180,000 6,550,000 522,953 6,141 100 121,269 6,471,269 - - - - 2,751,25934 - - - - 2,751,2593 120,000 47,000 130,000 81,000 1,440,506 100,652 97,228 81,967 109,537 1,416,027 - - - - 43,356,2656 3 37 - - - - 43,356,26526 36 37 1,498,000 1,481,000 1,448,000 1,492,000 18,248,285 8 39 1,381,523 1,401,043 1,632,427 1,464,946 18,134,184 8 3 - - - - 110,00040 - - - - 110,00040 -- - - 14,435,86941 - - - ' - 14,435,86941 1,518,000 1,707,000 1,500,000 2,542,000 22,689,07542 43 1,196,832 2,036,905 1,565,404 2,518,357 22,574,50842 43 20,000 50,000 85,000 78,411 233,411" 12,795 56,295 81,218 66,758 217,06746 23,548,000 12,000,000 5,500,000 8,615,000 293,449,64546 22,397,207 16,490,897 5,301,011 8,878,305 292,219,90946 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 19. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from CollinSville to (dera nds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 20. Walnut Creek CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 21. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, her 25. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA including Tuolumne and Stanslaus Rivers, CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost N.ew Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,330,000 1,141,392 2,150,000 1,925,392 1,154,000 1,554,463 752,000 97,482 10,000 4,428 4,050,000 4,119,569 928,624 800,233 781,026 877,114 6,849,000 5,825,274 410,000 368,700 1, 1, 44 1; 1 1 2 ,213,000 1,508,000 ,316,176 1,524,472 30,000 30,000 - 40,400 ,365,000 4,102,000 ,360,826 5,216,643 ;330,000 969,000 ,382,425 906,080 495,000 1,723,000 484,650 2,363,965 34,000 75,000 3,143 96,121 ,335,000 1,280,000 ,848,189 994,554 47,165 -483,000 239,037 -476,657 220,000 622,000 - 783,015 320,000 500,000 313,561 359,187 - - 5,700,000 6,251,283 411,000 433,032 80,000 4,486 4,700,000 5,500,387 437,000 462,832 1,772,000 1,758,290 3,381 4,042,500 3,921,536 941,000 1,011,304 1,600,000 923,511 90,000 101,299 4,591,000 3,667,875 710,000 641,386 -210,000 -232,098 526,000 404,415 160,000 150,000 5,719,000 2,855,897 550,200 529,709 7,201,000<7 48 7,045,62247 48 60,00049 43,781" 92,643,00851 52 92,282,24751 2 12,877,334b 12,808,773" 18,555,538 17,783,858 2,651,362" 6 2,647,353" 556 43,447,43067 42,149,585b" 3,338,2476 3,24 6,111� 2,875,07161 2,789,22961 2,456,000 2,187,163 160,000 150,00062 347,156,996" 64 343,682,9246 64 2,910,200 2,859,078 80,000" 4,486" 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,463,707 for shallow-draft and $22,836,204 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,404,005 for shallow-draft and $22,879,305 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $23,167,800 funds for Sacramento District and $24,288,200 for San Francisco District. 5. Includes $22,010,415 costs for Sacramento District and $23,794,287 for San Francisco District. 6. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 7. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds. 8. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 9. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: Total to date $897,742. 35-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 10. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake. 11. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 12. Includes $393 195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 13. Includes $100,000 contributed funds, other, from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 14. Includes $97,076 contributed funds, other, costs for New Hogan hydropower studies. 15. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs. 16. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. 17. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 18. Contributed funds, other, from Marin County including ;536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and 270,000 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 19. Contributed funds, other, costs including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $121,420 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 20. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 21. Includes total Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: Total to date $2,199,085. 22. Includes $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 23. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 24. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 25. Funds from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula. 26. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date $700,004. 27. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 28. Contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 29. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from the Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, CA, for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 30. Includes $53,812 contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 31. Includes $70,000 contributed funds, other, from DITT Inc., Paris, France, for hydropower studies at Success Lake. 32. Includes $29,957 contributed funds, other, costs for Success Lake hydropower studies. 33. Includes $1,200, initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 34. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed fundsother, for miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for project. 35. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date $1,595,100. 36. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities. 37. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 38. Includes $158,300 special recreation use fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake. 39. Includes $75,000 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 40. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 41. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711. 42. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 43. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 and FY 1986. 44. Includes $233,411 contributed funds, other, from city of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 45. Includes $217,067 contributed fund, other costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 46. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 47. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 48. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 49. Includes $60,000 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies. 50. Includes $43,781 contributed fund, other costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies. 51. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 52. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 53. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 54. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, 789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 55. Includes $41,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $25,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; and $175,000 contributed funds, other, from the 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT city of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake. 56. Includes $170,991 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies. 57. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds. 58. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs. 59. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required contributed funds. 60. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required contributed coSts. 61. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed fund costs. 62. Includes $150,000, contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District TABLE 35-A COST AND FINAN ADVANCE ENGINE for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 63. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries and Tuolumne River Basin, Calif.) (See Table 35-E). 64. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 65. Contributed funds, other, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 66. Contributed fund costs for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 'CIAL STATEMENT ERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 ' Cottonwood Creek, New Work CA Approp. 3,375,000 2,885,000 1,055,000 -50,000 15,765,000 Cost 2,667,898 3,472,949 1,019,478 17,510 15,745,469 Pajaro River New Work Basin, CA Approp. 190,000 50,000 60,000 20,000 2,269,9682 Cost 95,129 132,984 71,498 10,396 2,259,9762 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and 2. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds Design programs are funded under General Investigations and costs and $240,000 Sacramento General Investigation Appropriations. funds and costs. 35-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 19. Dec. 22, 1944 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet Rivers and Harbors between Colusa and Chico Landing, at a cost of $390,000 Committee Doc. 35, provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 73d Cong., 2d sess. 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Rivers and Harbors Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., CA, to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 2d sess. feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified by Chief of 2d sess. Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 Sec. 204, 1966 Flood percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. Control Act. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct lowlevel Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 404, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 35-28 18. SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Improvement for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., full monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 July 3, 1958 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and 2d sess.2 modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). July 3, 1958 Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. July 14, 1960 Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Project by construction of initial 10-year phase of 2d sess. 2 bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. May 12, 1967 Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection PL 90-17 approved in act of July 14, 1960. Mar. 7, 1974 Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion PL 93-251 control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose.3 June 19, 1975 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir4 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 8,354s 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,1325 6 - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185' 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 1o 11 3,316,62212 is Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,4891s 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728s16 - 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages, and public landings. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous projects. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal years 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For' Last Cost to Sep 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Alhambra Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA Bear River, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA East Weaver Creek, CA Eel River, CA Folsom Lake, American River, CA Gleason Creek, NV Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lakeport Lake, CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Mad River Basin, CA Marysville Lake, CA Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Reese River, Battle Mountain, N.V Rheem Creek, CA Rodeo Creek, CA Salinas River, CA Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT San Leandro Creek, CA San Lorenzo Creek, CA San Lorenzo River, CA Sevier River near Redmond, UT Sonoma Creek, CA Truckee River and tributaries, CA and NV Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Active/no FY 86 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Active/no FY 86 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Active/no FY 86 expenditure 1978 1981 1959 1967 1980 1955 1961 1964 1981 1968 1967 1965 1971 1967 1977 1963 1982 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1973 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 26,995,350 300,0001 s 2,125,8184 1,000 _b 1,369,9316 217,8797 8 26,0497 3,570,0009 705,6221 7 664,8257 10 220,6361 711 1,272,8161 12 63,014,810's 215,8261' 136,0267 's 1,532,93216 407,9897 17 1,503,0737 18 4,838,0001 10,252,95019 70,425,47020 2,353,00321 27,835,2632 4,243,7501 23 _24 10,918,79626 2,643,49926 2,965,40227 2,639,9551 12,890,62528 904,2787 29 30 885,7501 7 4,620,0701 31 133,3397 32 400,0001 7 33 974,1001 7 94,2131 34 1,227,57035 1,000,0001 36 5,130,8211 37 4,314,4061 38 919,00039 781,5001 40 1,038,960 35-31 54,7781 2 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Project classified as "inactive" January 19, 1982. 4. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Due to infeasibility, Bear River Phase I study was suspended and project classified as "inactive" on November 6, 1981. 6. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205 Public Law 80-858, as amended. 8. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 9. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 10. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 11. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 12. Excludes $194,821 contributed funds and placed inactive 1973. 13. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. Project prevented an estimated $4,700,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. 14. Due to lack of local support, Gleason Creek project was reclassified as "deferred" on November 3, 1977. Fiscal year 1978 carryover funds of $27,984 were revoked. 15. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 16. Vista and Devils Gate reservoirs and channel improvements were classified "inactive" on January 12, 1982, and Hylton reservoir was classified "inactive" on March 21, 1983, due to lack of economic feasibility. 17. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 18. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non- Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds).. 19. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $24,876,842. 20. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,015) for flood control reservation. Project prevented an estimated $262,800,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. 21. Preconstruction planning complete. Necessary reaffirmation of local cooperation assurances by Lake County Flood Control and Water Conservation District not received. Project was reclassified as "deferred" on September 15, 1977. Includes $298,500 costs for advance acquisition of land, Public Law 91-439. 22. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (non-project) at local interests expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-ofway for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 23. Placed inactive 1974. Excludes $225,000 applicable to Public Works Acceleration Program and $162,761 previous project Blue Lake levee. 24. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 25. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District. Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 26. Estimated cost's (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and' damages including relocations. 27. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 28. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759 127) for flood control reservation. 29. includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 30. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 31. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 32. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 33. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 34. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and 1963 to determine if project'classification to an active category was justified. 35. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $2,300,000 in damages from May-July 1986 snowmelt runoff. 36. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 38. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 40. Placed inactive 1974. 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 (Morgan County) TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Miles from Range in Feet Mouth of Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Place River Tidal' Tidal Floods Flood' Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.02 3 20 28 Veropa (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 2. Tide at low water season only. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT1 (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal2 Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,179 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. 35-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel2 7,882,0009 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement* 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index, of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento 3. For lands and construction. District, Improvement No. 3. TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (bihourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 2,100 440 1,350 Bear 3,600 1,840 1,430 Owens 1,200 1,220 145 Mariposa 6,500 12,260 1,070 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendoc o); Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,0001 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements below Dam 246,600,000 100,290,0002 346,890,000 Total $261,036,000 $105,888,000 $366,924,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 18 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet-Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,0001 Mendocino) of Russian River Channel Improvement (East Fork Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork below Coyote Valley Dam and Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian lower 98 miles of Russian River) River Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet-Earthfil! 381,000 340,600,000 Channel Improvement (Dry Creek) Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 5,400,000 below Dry Creek (Warm Springs Creek Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 19 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal' Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomes Creek2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees' Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 19 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 37 completion (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River and Sloughs, downstream from Sacramento) $585,139 $284,219 $869,358 Contract 38A completion (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 80.0-193.0) 260,293 403,353 663,646 Contract 38B initiation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 62.6-117.7) 657,925 657,925 Contract 39 continuation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 178.0-189.0) 601,420 1,233,882 1,835,302 Contract 40A initiation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 132.4-179.5) 250,000 250,000 35-36 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION This division comprises the State of Hawaii. The division also performs such actions pertaining to preservation and protection of navigable waters on and about the island of Guam and Amercian Samoa as provided for under River and Harbor Act of 1899, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands as provided for under Public Law 94-241 (H.J. Res 549) (March 24, 1976). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Agat Harbor, Territory of Guam.......... . 2. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii....... 3. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ........................ 4. Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii .......................... 5. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii.......... 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Beach Erosion Control 8. Aquatic Plant Control ................... 9. Asquiroga Bay, Territory of Guam......... 10. Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa............ 11. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Flood Control 12. Asan Village, Territory of Guam........... 13. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii............ 14. Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii............. 15. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................... Page 36-1 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-4 36-4 36-4 36-4 Flood Control (Cont.) 16. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 17. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works ...... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 18. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands ....... General Investigations 19. Surveys.......... .................... 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data........ Tables Table 36-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... Table 36-B Authorizing Legislation ........... Table 36-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects...................... Table 36-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .......... Table 36-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. Table 36-F Not Applicable Table 36-G Deauthorized Projects ............ Navigation 1. AGAT HARBOR, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. On the southwestern coast of the island of Guam, about 3,318 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408.) Existing project. Project provides for dredging an entrance channel 14 feet deep and 1,000 feet long, an 11 foot deep turning basin, an access channel 9 feet deep and 500 feet long, and constructing a 300-foot revetted mole and two breakwaters, a total of 1,100 feet long. The project also pro- 36-1 vides berthing space for 150 boats, a two-lane launch ramp and parking, and a shoreside facilities area. Estimated total project cost is $4,113,000 for which Federal cost is $2,026,000 (including $26,000 in U.S. Coast Guard cost) and non-Federal cost of $2,087,000. Project authority is Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Project was authorized for construction in June 1986. Local cooperation. Local interests have agreed to: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction of the project. Page 36-4 36-5 36-5 36-5 36-5 36-6 36-7 36-8 36-10 36-11 36-12 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 (b) Provide without cost to the United States an area suitable to the Chief of Engineers for the disposal of spoils and, if necessary, retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments or the cost of such work, currently estimated to be $398,000. (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States the necessary pier and docking facilities, as well as all appropriate onshore structures, access roadways, utilities, parking areas, restrooms, and launching facilities to insure a complete and adequate project. These facilities must be open to all on equal terms. (d) Accomplish without cost to the United States the necessary alterations and relocations of all utilities as necessary for project purposes. (e) Hold and save the United States free from claims for damages due to the construction work and subsequent maintenance of the project, excluding damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its Contractor. (f) Provide a cash contribution based on a percentage to be determined by final benefit and cost allocation analysis of the total Corps of Engineers first cost of project before apportionment. In addition, local interest must provide all cost in excess of the two million dollar statutory Federal limitation under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. The cash contribution is currently estimated to be $1,295,000. (g) In addition to the cash contribution for the project referenced in f. (above), Guam will provide to the Corps prior to commencement of project construction sufficient funds to cover the costs of the dredging of the berthing area. Costs for dredging the berthing area are currently estimated to be $426,000. (h) Create and construct at least 150 berths (boat slips), determined necessary in the Detailed Project Report, within 3 years from completion of the Corps' project. (i) Fulfill the requirements of non-Federal cooperation as may be required by the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), as amended. (j) Comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352), as amended. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed in May 1986. A construction contract is scheduled for award in October 1986. 2. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Goedetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 36-1 of FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost estimate is $63,600,000 of which Federal cost is $55,300,000 (including $372,500 in U.S. Coast Guard cost) and non- Federal cost is $8,300,000 including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution of $2,500,000. (See Thble 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of FY85 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See page 36-2 of FY84 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract awarded in March 1982 was completed in August 1985. The contract cost, including claim payment made in January 1985 to the contractor, was $56,833,154 of which Federal cost is $52,104,660 (including $320,000 in U.S. Coast Guard cost) and non-Federal cost is $4,728,494. Work remaining to be completed includes project beautification and stockpile plantings estimated at $1,348,000. Remaining work is scheduled for completion in April 1989. Maintenance: Annual operational cost for the Regional Visitor Center located at Fort DeRussy was $53,921. 3. KAULANA BAY BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the southern tip of the island of Hawaii in the Ka'u Judicial District about 80 road miles southwest of the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320.) Existing project. See page 36-2 of FY84 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of FY82 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There is an existing boat launching ramp owned by the State of Hawaii and open to all on equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Favorable constructions bids were received in September 1983 and a lawsuit filed in October 1983 for permanent injunction to enjoin construction contract award and negate lease agreement. A settlement agreement was signed by plaintiffs on May 30, 1984 removing the Corps from the suit. The project real estate is the subject of a State suit. The construction contract has been cancelled and further action on the project deferred. 4. MANELE BAY SMALL BOAT HARBOR, LANAI, HAWAII Location. On the southern coast of the island of Lanai about 6 miles south of Lanai City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4130.) Existing project. Project provides for extension of an existing 100-foot long stub breakwater with a 470-foot rubblemound breakwater with crest elevation of 14 feet at the head and 6 feet at the root; an entrance channel 12 feet deep, and main access channel and maneuvering areas 8 feet deep. The tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.8 feet. Total project cost for maintenance dredging is $240,000 in Federal cost. Project authority is Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Shoreside facilities provided by the State of Hawaii include berths, sanitary facilities, launch ramp and parking areas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract awarded in September 1985 was completed in December 1985 for $204,827. 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION 5. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the southwest coast of the island of Kauai and about 100 nautical miles northwest of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 19383.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 36-3 of FY84 Annual Report. Estimated total project cost for breakwater repair is $3,967,400 in Federal cost. (See Thble 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 36-3 of FY84 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Plans and specifications were completed in February 1986. A construction contract for repair of the breakwater was awarded in May 1986 for $3,303,000 with completion scheduled in August 1987. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted on Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, in September 1986 for $24,732; Kahului Harbor, Maui, in September 1986 for $17,335; Nawiliwili Deep Draft Harbor, Kauai, in August 1986 for $16,112 and Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, in August 1986 for $8,675. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Preauthorization studies were continued on Merizo Harbor, Guam, $4,722; East Molokai, Molokai, $48,720; and Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, $40,011; completed on Pala Lagoon, American Samoa, $10,000; and terminated on Kahana Bay, Oahu, $24,999. Plans and specifications were initiated on Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, $76,793. Beach Erosion Control 8. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program was conducted in streams, drainage channels, aquatic recreation areas, and other waters in the Hawaiian Islands. Existing project. The purpose of the program was to conduct reconnaissance investigations to evaluate aquatic plant control to determine whether Federal involvement was justified for the control of the water hyacinth and other aquatic plants. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in September 1985 and completed in April 1986 for $4,400. The report concluded that the aquatic plant control problems were not of a Federal interest. 9. ASQUIROGA BAY, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. On the southeastern shore of the island of Guam, about 3,318 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408.) Existing project. Project provides for a 275 foot rock revetment with a crest elevation + 14.0 feet MLLW with a slope of 1V on 1.5H. Total project cost is $227,181 in Federal cost. Project authority is Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Project was approved for construction in August 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of FY83 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract awarded in February 1985 was completed in December 1985 for $180,569. 10. OFU AIRSTRIP, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the southern end of the island of Ofu, about 2,300 miles southwest of Honolulu, Hawaii. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190, Manu Islands.) Existing project. Project provides for a 380 foot long rock revetment using two layers of 1,300 to 2,100 pound stones on a 2 foot thick underlayer/filter cloth. Estimated total project cost is $220,000 in Federal cost. Project authority is Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. Project was approved for construction in May 1986. Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for Project construction. (b) Hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance of the Project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (c) Assure continued condition of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the economic life of the Project. (d) Assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the Project as required to serve the intended purposes. (e) Comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). (f) Comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352). (g) Assume full responsibility for all Project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in August 1986 for $149,000 with completion scheduled in November 1986. Construction has not been initiated as of September 30, 1986. 11. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Preauthorization study was terminated on Waiehu Beach Park, Maui, $15,000. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874. Preauthorization studies were continued on Masefau Bay, American Samoa, $2,500; completed on Lepua Area, American Samoa, $23,067; Poipu Beach Park, Kauai, $7,500, and 36-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 terminated on Makaha Beach Park, Oahu, $42,833. Plans and specifications were terminated on Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, $6,062. Flood Control 12. ASAN VILLAGE, TERRITORY OF GUAM Location. On the west central coastal area of the island of Guam and about 2.5 miles east of Agana, the capital of Guam. The island of Guam is approximately 3,318 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii, and 1,300 miles south of Tokyo, Japan. (See NOAA Chart 81048.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 36-4 of FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost is $1,901,134 of which Federal cost is $1,275,500 and non- Federal cost is $625,634. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract awarded in September 1983 was completed in December 1985 for $1,401,247. A construction deficiency reported in August 1984 was settled in November 1985 for $29,500. 13. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See NOAA Chart 19348.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 36-5 of FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost estimate (October 1986) is $17,200,000 of which Federal cost is $10,840,000 and non-Federal cost is $5,500,000 for lands, damages, relocations, and cash contributions ($860,000). (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (a) The County shall provide, during the period of construction, not less than 25 percent of total project costs, such percentage to include the value of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility and facility alterations and relocations required for construction of the project, as well as a cash payment of not less than 5 percent of total project costs. (b) The Government, using funds provided by the County and appropriated by the Congress, shall expeditiously construct the Project, applying those procedures usually followed or applied in Federal projects, pursuant to Federal laws, regulations, and policies. Award of Federal contracts and the work thereunder shall be exclusively within the control of the Government. (c) Upon completion of project construction, the Government shall turn the project over to the County who shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, and rehabilitating the project. (d) No less than once each year the County shall inform affected interests regarding the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. (e) The County shall publicize floodplain information in the area concerned and shall provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the floodplain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to prevent unwise development in the floodplain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to ensure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. (f) The County shall, to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1986. A construction contract was awarded in September 1986 for $12,180,000 with completion scheduled in July 1989. 14. WAIMEA RIVER, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the west-central portion of the island of Kauai which is about 103 statute miles northwest of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 19381.) Existing project. Project provides for 3,320 feet of concrete rubble masonry floodwall on existing levee, 4,600 feet of rock toe protection, 500 feet of road raise 1,030 feet of levee extension, 335 feet of concrete wall, new floodgates and a flood warning system. Estimated total project cost is $3,272,400 of which Federal cost is $3,212,400 and non-Federal cost is $60,000 for the flood warning system. Project authority is Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Project was authorized for construction in May 1983. Construction funds were alloted under the Jobs Bill Program. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-8 of FY82 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract awarded in September 1983 was completed in December 1984 for $2,467,005. Flood warning system, estimated at $300,000, remains to be completed upon receipt of non-Federal funds. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Preauthorization studies were continued on Garapan Area, Northern Marianas, $16,492; completed on Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, $9,033; Lake Susupe, Northern Marianas, $6,223; and terminated on Honaunau Area, Hawaii, $10,447. Plans and specifications were initiated on Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, $110,486. Federal cost during fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $169,099 for disaster preparedness. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were conducted on Asan River, Guam, in November 1985 and June 1986; Hanapepe River, Kauai, in November 1985; Iao Stream, Maui, in December 1985; 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Kaneohe-Kailua Dam in October 1985; Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, and Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, in December 1985; Namo River, Guam, in November 1985 and June 1986; Paauau Stream, Hawaii, in December 1985; Wailoa Stream, Hawaii, in December 1985; and Waimea River, Kauai, in November 1985 for a total cost of $8,831. 17. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Inspections were conducted at Hahaione Stream, Kapakahi Stream, Kapalama Stream, Moanalua Stream, Niu Stream, Omao Stream, Pearl City Channel, Waialae-Iki Stream and Waialae-Nui Stream, all on the Island of Oahu, during July 1986 for a total cost of $2,478. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, TRUST TERRITORY OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map.) Existing project. See page 36-4 of FY85 Annual Report. (See 'Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Page 36-5 of FY85 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for $5,622,000 was awarded in October 1985 with completion scheduled in December 1987. A contract to operate and maintain the project for a one-year period to October 1988 is incorporated in the work to be done. Construction is approximately 31% complete as of September 30, 1986. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $679,090 of which $323,936 was for navigation studies, $120,129 for flood damage prevention studies, $14,995 for review of authorized projects, $57,012 for miscellaneous activities, and $163,018 for coordination with other agencies. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Federal and nonfederal agencies and the Private sector are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, flood-water velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 648. Of this total, 73 were from other federal agencies, 283 from non-federal agencies, and 292 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Of the 648 requests, assistance resulted in 2,560 site specific responses. A hurricane vulnerability study initiated in September 1983 for the State of Hawaii was completed in January 1986 at a total cost of $140,000 non-Federal funds. A hurricane wind strength study was initiated in February 1986 and completed in September 1986 for the State of Hawaii at a total cost of $30,000. Costs for Providing Flood Plain Management services during fiscal year were $221,738. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $5,002. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $226,740. 36-5 TABLE 36-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATMENT Project Agat Harbor Territory of Guam (Federal Funds) 2. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 4. Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Asquiroga Bay, Territory of Guam (Federal Funds) 10. Ofu Airstrip American Samoa (Federal Funds) 12. Asan Village, Territory of Guam (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 14. Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 18. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, TTPI (Federal Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Tobtal Cost lb FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sept. 30, 1986 - 35,000 18,800 52,000 14,443 9,771 41,838 52,808 17,690,000 16,500,000 11,827,000 -4,155,000 21,659,777 14,346,100 8,348,616 1,485,293 875,801 567,464 374,434 - 943,309 673,952 376,920 58,485 481,000 -406,000 - -35,600 38,336 13,221 16 1,208 86,000 154,000 20,823 219,157 1,489,400 -25,000 85,000 480,000 1,474,014 34,328 537,875 511,030 5,381 5,381 - 220,000 -22,800 - 48,001 149,199 - 32,000 160,000 - 7,000 25,461 908,400 119,600 115,838 610,486 630,000 15,000 - 409,803 246,330 55,643 -19,366 210,465 5,366 20,000 10,000 20,000 87,000 19,854 10,315 10,009 82,959 2,564,000 -69,600 405,000 -130,000 109,505 2,180,214 462,599 14,251 - 60,000 114,000 6,000,000 - 9,188 145,350 1,786,232 36-6 See Section In Text 1. 394,300 392,917 53,745,500 53,326,007 4,249,670 2,273,281 159,400 159,400 372,000 372,000 423,622 423,602 370,845 370,845 2,127,724 2,127,724 6,290,220 6,290,019 233,261 233,261 227,181 227,181 192,000 32,461 1,275,500 1,275,500 625,634 625,634 856,000 841,942 2,917,400 2,914,569 6,174,000 1,940,770 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Oct. 27, 1965 An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a 1st sess.. breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a small-boat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. 5. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Mar. 2, 1919 An entrance channel 35 feet deep; a harbor basin 1,100 feet H. Doc. 609, 62nd Cong., wide, 35 feet deep, and.about 1,950 feet long; and a rubble- 2nd sess., as modified mound breakwater, by the Chief of Engineers. Sep. 3, 1954 Deepening entrance channel to 40 feet; enlarging harbor H. Doc. 453, 83 Cong., basin; and constructing a revetted-fill area. (Modified by the 2nd sess. (Contains Chief of Engineers.) lastest published maps.) Dec. 31, 1970 Modification of General Navigation features. River and Harbor Act. 13. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Oct. 22, 1976 A debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a capacity H. Doc. 94-488, 94th of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80 Cong., 2nd sess. feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. 18. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, TTPI Mar. 20, 1980 Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Sec. 101, PL 96-205 Dec. 8, 1983 Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction Sec. 2, PL 98-213 of a hydroelectric project. 36-7 TABLE 36-C REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Completed 1978 $ 937,798' $ 11,196 'ITerritory of Guam Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island Welles Harbor, Midway Island Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Deferred Active Completed Active Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Active Completed Completed Inactive Completed 1976 1982 1982 1978 1972 1982 1971 1985 1976 1984 1967 1968 1966 1981 1956 1981 1977 1981 1972 1976 1976 1979 1984 1967 1985 1982 1985 1979 1950 1950 40,117 1,033,0152 1,783,1293 527,0474 1,481 5,423,440 781,0365 16,044,0956 751,8677 7,203,2218 157,9979 138,188 5,983,50110 3,348,00011 193,000 186,937 195,000 30,378 584,51312 980,01813 432,52314 752,41515 _ 16 2,000,000'" 194,000 1,991,56918 1,940,011'9 2,448,05620 65,000 71,897 14,493 2,111 36-8 5,883 208,902 3,680,856 63,693 2,038,271 6,738,020 3,127 292,441 61,800 41,857 30,707 668,354 884,833 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1982. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1982. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 6Completed in March 1970. In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 6In addition Contriubted Funds of $201,282 for Construction. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1976. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1967. '�In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. "Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 12Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in August 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. "4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1979. 'SIn addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. '6Reclassified from deferred to active category on May 16, 1983. '7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in March 1985. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. '8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1985. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 19In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 20Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,0151 $ - Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,1482 - Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii Deferred 1965 - - Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,4883 - Kapaa Tbwn, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,9164 - Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,9965 - Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,3136 - Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,4727 - Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,0008 - Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,9419 - Pago Pago, to Nuuuli, American Samoa Active 1978 394,18710 - Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,0401 - Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,87912 - Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,30913 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Active 1979 729,08714 - Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Deferred 15 85,043 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Completed in April 1965. In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1975. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1976. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in June 1984. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in June 1984. 10Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1978. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. Z2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1981. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds $132,075 in Contributed Funds. 14In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 15No previous full report; project authorized by R & H Act of 1958. 36-10 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 $ 784,8671 $ Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,0002 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,4003 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,4784 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,5675 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,0006 Namo River, Territory of Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 - Paauau Stream, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,5148 - Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Completed 1966 1,044,8889 - Hawaii, Hawaii 'Completed in November 1966. In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 2Completed in November 1983. 3Completed in October 1984. Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of reacreation construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1950. 5Completed in August 1966. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1970. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1982. sCompleted in September 1985. 9Completed in August 1965. 36-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Hana Small Boat Harbor, 1967 November 1977 $ - Maui, Hawaii HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, 1967 November 1981 Kauai, Hawaii HD #97-59 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, 1975 July 1981 86,235 Hawaii, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control 1979 July 1981 221,500 Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Talofofo Bay Bay Shore Protection - August 1981 80,764 Territory of Guam Director of Civil Works 36-12 PORTLAND, OR, DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA .......... 2. Chetco River, OR ...................... 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR .. 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ....... 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island ............... 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR ................... 8. Columbia River, Ilwaco, WA.............. 9. Coos Bay, OR ......................... 10. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR........... 11. Coquille River, OR ................... . 12. Depoe Bay, OR . ..................... 13. Kalama Turning Basin, WA ............. 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 15. Nehalem Bay, OR .................... 16. Port Orford, OR ...................... 17. Project Condition Surveys .............. 18. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR... 19. Siuslaw River, OR ..................... 20. Skamokawa Creek, WA................. 21. Skipanon Channel, OR................. 22. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR............ 23. Umpqua River, OR .................... 24. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR. 25. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ........... Page 37-2 37-2 37-2 37-4 37-4 37-4 37-4 37-5 37-5 37-6 37-6 37-7 37-7 37-7 37-7 37-7 37-8 37-8 37-8 37-9 37-9 37-9 37-9 37-10 37-10 Flood Control 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .. Blue River Lake, OR................. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................ Dorena Lake, OR ..................... Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .. Fall Creek Lake, OR ................... Fern Ridge Lake, OR .................. 37-11 37-11 37-12 37-12 37-12 37-13 37-13 Page 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 37-13 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 37-14 35. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works .... 37-14 36. John Day River (West), OR ............. 37-14 37. Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA. 37-15 38. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA ...................... 37-15 39. Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA ............ 37-15 40. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA ............................ 37.16 41. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................... 37-16 42. West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR .. 37-16 43. Willamette River Basin, OR ............ 37-16 44. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, O R ................... :....................37-17 45. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR..........37-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 46. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ................ 37-17 47. Cougar Lake, OR...................... 37-18 48. Detroit Lake, OR ..................... 37-19 49. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ........... 37-19 50. Hills Creek Lake, OR ........................ 37-20 51. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ................. 37-20 52. Lookout Point Lake, OR ................ 37-21 53. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR . 37-21 54. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR .......................... 37-22 General Investigations 55. Surveys .............................. 37-22 56. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 37-23 57. Continuation of Planning and Engineering 37-23 37-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Tables Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 37-24 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 37-31 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 37-39 Table 37-D Not Applicable Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 37-40 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power .. 37-44 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 37-44 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ................. 37-45 Table 37-I Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Pub ic Law 86-645 ...................... 37-45 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR and WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88 August 15, 1985. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost from construction of the new navigation lock is $203,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of relocation portion of the new navigation lock was initiated in May 1986 with award of a horizontal drain contract for stabilization of a potential slide area. A contract for relocation of a section of the main line of the Union Pacific Railroad and for modification of the I-84 off ramp was awarded in July 1986. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing projects. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification in 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys ...... 37-45 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ...... 37-45 Table 37-L Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ...................... 37-46 Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 37-47 Table 37-N Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA, Levees and Improvements to Existing Works .. 37-48 Table 37-0 Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan .............. 37-49 Table 37-P Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam and Powerpiant ............... 37-51 basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 40,267 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, & 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington). Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended at its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a smallboat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet-pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth to Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver about 3 feet at low stages of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver they average about 12 feet, while highest known reached a stage of 33 feet above low water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift on-lift off and roll on-roll off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll on-roll off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 6,642,617 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2,172,200 cubic yards, and contract hopper dredge Stuyvesant removed 256,774 cubic yards. In addition, the pipeline dredge Oregon 37-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 removed 3,706,648 cubic yards, and the contract pipeline dredge Lofgren removed 506,995 cubic yards. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A U.S. hopper dredge removed 58,921 cubic yards of material. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook: a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract Clamshell dredge Mukiltco removed 124,081 cubic yards of material. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 7,832,392 cubic yards was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 3,106,500 cubic yards of material and the contract dredge Stuyvesant removed 4,725,892 cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4, "Columbia 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas- Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for developrrnient to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is one one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 305,799 cubic yards of material and the sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, ILWACO, WA Location. West channel of Baker Bay, starting at Columbia River Mile 3 and extending northward 3 miles to the entrance of the mooring basin at Ilwaco, Pacific County, Washington. Existing project. The present channel is 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2,000 feet, then 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin. Work was authorized under the special continuing authority contained in Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The plan of improvement provides for deepening the channel to 16 feet along the existing alinement and the width to remain the same. This plan will reduce delays, minimize damages to commercial boats, and allow larger boats access to the processing facilities at Ilwaco, WA. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, Port of Ilwaco, has agreed to provide necessary easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations. The Port also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and to provide and maintain mooring and public use facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: All scheduled dredging work was completed by August 1985. Seeding of disposal area completed 1986. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 37-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance to Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1970. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oilreceiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300, 576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. -Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Total of 951,584 cubic yards removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 192,083 cubic yards; Essayons removed 75,500 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Stuyvesant removed 684,001 cubic yards of material. 10. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: a channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Dellwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966 construction of project as modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Major log processing yards are located at the head of navigation on both rivers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract pipeline dredge Marathon removed 32,747 cubic yards of material. 11. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 61,339 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 12. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; and inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modification, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed. 13. KALAMA TURNING BASIN, WA Location. Columbia River between miles 73+10 and 73+50 at Kalama, Washington. Existing Project. The present channel is 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide and 4,000 feet long. The improvement provides for a turning basin 40 feet deep, averaging width of 1,100 feet and 4,000 feet long. Local Cooperation. The Port of Kalama agreed to provide necessary easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations. The Port also agreed to hold the United States free from damages and to provide and maintain mooring and public use facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work. Contract pipeline dredge Oregon removed approximately 145,000 cubic yards of material. All scheduled work completed February 1986. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 37-I. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Sampling and identification of aquatic plant infestation in Columbia River and Willamette River Basins were accomplished. Total costs for fiscal year were $15,707. 15. NEHALEM BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast, 40 miles from Columbia River mouth and 10 miles north of the entrance to Tillamook Bay. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 3,850 feet long on the north side of entrance and a jetty 4,950 feet long on the south side. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 15 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1918. Rehabilitation work was initiated in May 1981 and completed November 1982. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities for pleasure craft only: Dart's Marina, Brighton Moorage, Jetty Fishery, Port of Nehalem and city of Nehalem Dock. All areas have approximately 50-60 slips. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Inspection performed. 16. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR.) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 550-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet ia 90% complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. 37-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months, the sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. A contract submersible pump dredge removed 2,509 cubic yards of material which would provide users with adequate depths to utilize cranes during the winter months. 17. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during FY 1986 at a cost of $105,344; cumulative costs, $593,000 (See Table 37-J). 18. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon, flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1984, three pile dikes, south side of channel, oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced isolated shoals on the entrance. 19. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 18583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Suislaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 85. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions will terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Estimated cost of jetty work is $30,727,000; $30,500,000 Corps of Engineers, $183,000 non-Federal, and $44,000 U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contractual work on extension of the north and south jetties completed in FY 86. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 218,836 cubic yards of material. 20. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA. Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about 10 miles, and empties into Columbia River about 34 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6.5 feet deep at low water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 7 feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is reached in creek at Skamokawa, WA. Project as authorized was completed in 1920. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats, commercial fishing vessels, and pleasure craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Inspection performed. 21. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 6 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to public on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use of a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 19,785 cubic yards of material. 22. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alinement extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished September 1965. Construction of south jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports. 23. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) 37-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1954 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. The 12-foot channel in Scholfield River is currently classified inactive. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also, there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final fiscal requirements were completed. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 263,028 cubic yards of material. Repairs to breakwater near the inshore end of the training jetty initiated. 24. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Provides for construction of a new single-lift main lock and a guard lock each with clear dimensions of 56 by 400 feet and a minimum depth over sills of 9.5 feet, to replace existing facilities which were provided for by purchase, rehabilitation, and deepening to 6 feet at low water of existing canal and locks and separation of canal from waterpower intake by construction of a concrete division wall. Construction of a new lock has been deauthorized. The existing locks are on the National Register for historic sites. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Canal and locks originally constructed by private interests in 1873 were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. Replacement of gates Nos. 6 and 7 was completed August 1967 under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in fair condition and in continuous operation except when flooded out by high water or undergoing repair. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Normal operation and maintenance performed. Traffic through lock totaled 802,937 tons during calendar year 1985. 25. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage for 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 27,131 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Atchafalaya removed 210,232 cubic yards of material. 26. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 27. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in 37-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application in April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 28. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity nonoverflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at four sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 29. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been inforce with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement.. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 30. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work continues to provide for a 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam. Reservoir 6.2 miles long will provide 95,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles. Reservoir will be operated to provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of a bypass road to route traffic away from the damsite and stockpiling of gravels to be used in the main dam and relocated roads. All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Final environmental statement was filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated Federal cost of project is $120,000,000. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT willing to cost share in recreation development and assume all operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Relocated county roadwork has essentially been completed. Main dam contract was awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. in January 1986 in the amount of $63.7 million. The contractor has completed dam site clearing, excavation of foundation and is currently placing concrete in the regulating outlet of the dam. A reservoir clearing contract is scheduled to be awarded Spring 1987. 31. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contracts with Lane County and Bethel School District. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-M. 32. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane County, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam, 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a nonoverflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing areeement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing argreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory water fowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-M. 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 37-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Pudding River, Anderson Road, OR, $186. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were: $270,740, disaster preparedness; $-10,250, emergency operations; $177,666, rehabilitation; $222,670, advance measures. Contributed funds for levee raising were $120. Mt. St. Helens Emergency Measures. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Volcanic debris substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a 37-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 short time after the eruption and was essentially completed during FY 1982. Total cost of Mt. St. Helens emergency measures, from initiation through FY 1986, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, is $275,727,000. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. Spirit Lake, WA. Portland District was directed on August 24, 1982 to respond to the Presidential declaration of a State of Emergency for the Spirit Lake area. This declaration was precipitated by the release of a U.S. Forest Service Spirit Lake Interagency Task Force report assessing the flood hazard posed by that body of water, which has been without a natural outlet since the May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The report concluded that Spirit Lake would fill to an extremely dangerous level by as early as Spring 1983 and also mentioned concern over the structural stability of the debris plug holding back the lake due to the development of an extensive system of deep erosion gullies on its surface, some as deep as 40 feet. To contain the threat of a possible devastating flood caused by a failure of the Spirit Lake debris plug, and in response to a tasking from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Portland District initiated a program aimed at meeting two objectives: (a) undertake interim measures to assure that the lake is not allowed to continue rising unchecked so that the threat of a possible flood during 1983 is averted, and, (b) perform field investigations and preliminary design work necessary to make a recommendation to FEMA for a permanent solution to the threat of flooding from Spirit Lake. An interim solution was implemented to maintain the lake at a safe level through pumping water from the lake from October to July each year. A comprehensive plan for long-term flood control and navigation maintenance, as a result of the Mt. St. Helens eruption, was completed in 1983. This document included alternative methods of eliminating the threat of catastrophic flooding due to the unstable avalanche debris dam at Spirit Lake. A decision document selecting the final plan for responding to this threat was completed in February 1984. This plan called for the construction of an 8,500-foot-long tunnel through Harry's Ridge to permanently maintain Spirit Lake at a safe level. Until the tunnel was completed in April 1985, the lake elevation was maintained through pumping from a bargemounted pumping plant at Spirit Lake. Pumping was discontinued on April 1, 1985. A contract was initiated in August 1985 to restore the pumping area to a natural condition. The total cost for pumping and pump site restoration through FY 86 is $11,630,000. Construction of the tunnel began in June 1984. The tunnel began operating on May 6, 1985, and the lake was lowered by 20 feet to the design elevation of 3,400 by September 1985. The cost for tunnel construction through FY 86 is $13,716,000. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 57 leveed areas and 264 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Of this total, 10 leveed areas in Oregon and 42 leveed areas in Washington were inspected during FY 1986. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin was supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Periodic contact was maintained with uncooperative areas reported in FY 1985 and 1986 to ascertain any change in attitude and to provide technical assistance, if requested. Of the 81 sponsors for some 125 local flood protection projects inspected in Portland District, 15 were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $96,311 and total costs to September 30, 1986 were $1,247,288. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Annual inspections are made of levees, flood control structures, and communities that have received previous assistance under the various features of Public Law 84-99 (flood fights, levee rehabilitation, advance measures). Inspections involve determining physical condition of levees and other structures, riprap displacement and vegetation control. Inspections also serve a valuable disaster preparedness function in terms of explaining to local interests their preparedness responsibilities and criteria for qualifying for future emergency assistance under PL 84-99. Local sponsors are advised of results of inspections. Approximately 52 locations throughout the Portland District were inspected under this feature during FY 1986, at a cost of $78,653. 36. JOHN DAY RIVER (WEST), OR Location. Left bank of John Day River Road location, on the left bank of John Day River (West) mile 2.3, approximately 4 miles east of Astoria, OR. Work would be accomplished under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Existing Project: Plan of improvement provides protection for 776 linear feet of bankline from erosion at John Day River Road location with quarry stone embankment. A layer of filter fabric will be placed on the damaged bank to provide support for the stone. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final fiscal requirements were completed. 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 37. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, channels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, OR, about 15 miles east of Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,000 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $25,600,000 and non-Federal cost is $269,000; (b) See Table 37-N on Levees and Improvements to Existing Works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oregon and Washington, provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, WA, about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non- Federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, WA, about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, WA, has been reclassified "deferred". Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Federal cost for all work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, OR, and WA, is $67,458,776. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, OR, was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, OR, June 1962; Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR, October 1962; Woodson Drainage District, OR, December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, OR, June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District, No. 15, WA, December 1965; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, Nos. 2 and 13, WA, June 1965; Midland Drainage District, OR, April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No. 2, WA, June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, OR, June 1978; Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District #1, WA, October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, OR, September 1980. Washougal Area, WA, (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction has been completed at numerous locations. (See Section 44 for additional information). Local cooperation. Flood Control act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Total non-Federal cost for all work is $4,567,000. For details of status or requirements of local cooperation see individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. See individual projects. 38. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,600,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $267,000. Operations during fiscal year. Tansy Railroad location near the cities of Hammond and Warrenton, OR was completed (3,840 linear feet). Protective work as Lerch location (700 linear feet) on Sauvie Island Drainage District, and 128th Avenue location (250 linear feet) at Multnomah County Drainage District No. 1 was initiated. 39. MOUNT ST. HELENS & VICINITY, WA Location. Along the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers from Spirit Lake at the base of Mt. St. Helens to the confluence of the Cowlitz with the Columbia River (River Mile 68) approximately 55 miles downstream from Portland, OR. Existing project. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valley. Mudflows triggered by the eruption carried large volumes of sediment from the debris avalanche into these river valleys, reducing the hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected with even normal runoff. Storm runoff and surface drainage continue to deliver sediment from the debris avalanche into the rivers. Funds allocated under Public Law 84-99 were used for major recovery work on the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers. In late FY 1983, interim flood control measures were implemented under the authority of Public Law 98-63 to assure 100-year flood protection to developed areas along the Cowlitz River. Measures implemented are primarily dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers and a monitoring program. Local cooperation. Local sponsors are responsible for obtaining any additional lands easements and rights-ofway. The State of Washington has agreed to act as the local sponsor. State funds have been appropriated for 37-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 acquisition of lands and related expenses for Mt. St. Helens recovery operations. The State of Washington has spent over $2,500,000 to procure disposal sites for dredged material. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to remove 4.0 million cubic yards of sediment from the LT-3 site on the Toutle River was awarded in late September 1985. A total of 3.3 million cubic yards was removed at LT-3 through March 1986, at a cost of $4,323,000. Two additional contracts to remove sediment from LT-1, and LT-3 are underway at this time. 40. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the proplems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing Project. The proejct was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "...to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green Rivers, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision Document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests are responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests are also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites will be the responsibility of local interests. Non-federal cash contribution is $3,500,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year: Work on the Sediment Retention Structure site clearing contract was initiated in FY 86. Advanced Engineering and Design was completed during FY 86 and construction was authorized in July 1986. 41. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins) and (Mossyrock) a municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light. The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. Under licensing agreement, the Tacoma City Light utility is required to provide 360,000 acre-feet of flood storage by December of each year. The Bureau of Reclamation sponsored projects were operated satisfactorily during FY 1986 for flood control. At Mossyrock there were two high water periods in 1986. During the last week of October to the 10th of November 1985, reservoir regulation stored approximately 224,000 acre-feet at Mossyrock. Peak discharges at Castle Rock were below the regulation goal of 70,000 cubic feet per second during the flood season. Unregulated flows would have also been 82,000 cubic feet. The spring snowmelt runoff was much below normal with very little precipitation during October through December period. Preparation of Reservoir Regulation Manuals for Scoggins and Mossyrock Projects is scheduled. Total cost of monitoring the five projects during FY 1985 was $3,602. 42. WEST MAKINSTER ROAD, WILSON RIVER, OR Location. West Makinster location, on the left bank of Wilson River, mile 1, about 2 miles north-northwest of Tillamook, Tillamook County, OR. Work would be accomplished under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Existing project. Plan of improvement called for approximately 8,400 cubic yards of quarry stone to be placed over a total of 960 linear feet of bankline to correct the erosion problem. A ground stabilizing fabric was placed on the damaged bank to provide support for the stone. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final fiscal requirements were completed. 43. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle Forks which join a few miles above Eugene, OR, flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. The basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter the main stream from the west, are Long Tom River, Marys River, and Rickreall Creek. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized funds for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development: the 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. Following projects were completed as authorized and are in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, April 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961; Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Under the memoranda of agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, recreation facilities also have been constructed at Detroit, Lookout Point, Cougar, Blue River, and Hills Creek Lakes. Recreational facilities were constructed at Green Peter-Foster Lakes with initial construction funds. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs. Uses which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, fisheries, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every purpose, water released from reservoirs during the low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. (See Table 37-0 on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports. 44. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR "" Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,300,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $377,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A total of 3,650 linear feet of riprap revetment bank protection was completed at Minto-Brown location. No further construction was conducted during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual inspection of revetments was made by helicopter in July 1986. 45. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs, (cubic feet per second) an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acrefeet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provision of the Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(bX1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. None required. Development of recreation facilities will require cost sharing with a nonfederal local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New work: (See Walla Walla, WA District Annual Report.) Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 46. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. SExisting project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade Island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates, 10 with remote 37-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of two units of 43,200 kilowatts and eight units of 54,000 kilowatts each, totaling 518,400 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests upon solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 15 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-P. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest - Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provides for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,076.6 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1953. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 projectwide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Contracts for relocation of the highway, railroad and town of North Bonneville are 99 percent complete. Construction of the main powerhouse and supply contracts for associated powerhouse equipment are 99 percent complete and Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. Estimated cost for construction of second powerhouse is $663,000,000. A cost sharing agreement between The Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities is now under way at Home Valley and is expected to be completed in 1987. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 190.3 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $258,085,302 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non- Federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued on restoration of areas disturbed by powerhouse construction. Final stages of the juvenile bypass system and monitoring facilities were under construction. Correction of deficiencies in fish guidance efficiency at the Second Powerhouse will reduce fingerling mortality incurred during annual downstream migration. Maintenance: The modernization program continued to be implemented. Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 5,097,795,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,080,217,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of rafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 7,679,778 tons during calendar year 1985. 4'f. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 3.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $15,591,461 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $102,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continuation of negotiations for the innovative financing of Strube Lake and Couger Additional Unit. Maintenance: Installation of a new alarm reporting system is increasing the ability to monitor the project for safety from the Foster Powerhouse. Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 155,266,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 154,392,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 48. DETROIT LAKE, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 45 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1985 power generation totaled 16.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $53,942,534 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Installation of a new alarm reporting system is increasing the ability to remotely monitor the project from the Foster Powerhouse. Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 493,484 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 460,309 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 49. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general 37-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 foundation and a concrete gravity gate-controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with a capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 6.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $36,238,043 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 3 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. These parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn County under lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair of the powerhouse roof was completed. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 353,475,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 350,668,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 50. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 3.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $15,868,213 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 172,172,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated, of which 171,602,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 51. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-P. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 is essentially complete. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent complete. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 190.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $230,860,730 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $512,043,000, consisting of $511,710,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 4 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT agreement with the Corps. Irrigon Park was expanded under cost sharing agreement and is managed by the Irrigon Park and Recreation Commission. Any future recreation developlment will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contracts were awarded for the second of two phases of construction to complete work on a juvenile by-pass system in September 1985. The contract for the first phase of construction was physically completed in October 1985. The by-pass facility consists of a collection system of submersible traveling screens, a conduit mined above the intakes to each turbine-generator unit and across the length of the powerhouse, a conduit extending from the powerhouse to an outfall structure downstream, and an intake gantry crane to handle fish facilities equipment. The juvenile by-pass system work is anticipated to be completed by September 1987. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 10,257,924,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 10,239,724,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 6,177,268 tons during calendar year 1985. Rehabilitation: Refurbishment of two generator windings and rebuilding (to strengthen) two turbines were completed. A multi-unit generator refurbishment contract awarded will enable completion of 75% of all turbine generator work included in the rehab program. The contract for upgrading the powerhouse control system was awarded in 1985, which when complete should increase the reliability and ease of operation of the powerhouse. 52. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of main stem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acrefeet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Use of Dexter Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Lookout Point units was effected in December 1954. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 13.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $55,562,601 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 411,607,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 409,791,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 53. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility with provisions for temperature 37-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 2.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $13,614,364 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Rogue River hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During fiscal year 277,700,000 kilowatthours of electrical power energy were generated at project bf which 275,182,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue Rivet are shown in Table 37-M. 54. THE DALLES LOCK AND D M-LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially and substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fishwater units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts, the 22 unit total is 1,808,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-P. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water Supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1986 power generation totaled 203.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $250,560,540 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operative and maintenace by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 8,158,506 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 8,139,778 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo amounted to 6,252,068 tons during calendar year 1985. General Investigations 55. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $4,923,245 of which $385,766 was for navigation studies, $3,852,316 for flood damage prevention studies, $458,173 for comprehensive studies, $4,912 for reviews of authorized projects, $179,953 for 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT miscellaneous activities, and $42,125 for coordination with other agencies. 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International water studies. The Columbia River Treaty between Canada and the United States of America relating to cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin was signed at Washington, D.C., on January 17, 1961, and the exchange of ratifications took place on September 16, 1964. Implementation of the Treaty by the United States and Canada entities under the guidance of the Permanent Engineering Board has continued. The two permanent committees established by the entities, the Operating Committee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, continue to function. Costs for support of both committee activities were $15,760 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 821. Of this total, 74 were from other Federal agencies; 265 from non-Federal agencies; and 482 from private sector realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during FY 1986 totaled $116,528. Hydrologic studies. Environmental and ecological aspects are being considered on all hydrologic studies. Improvements in procedures to determine reservoir temperatures, nitrogen supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, suspended sediment, turbidity, design floods, flood forecasting and flood regulation are a continuing program. Costs for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year were $3,848. Total costs for collection and study of basic data for fiscal year 1986 were $177,044. 57. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Cowlitz River and Tributaries, WA The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Feasibility Report completed in December 1984 recommended construction of a single retention structure and associated downstream actions. The preferred plan in that report consisted of a 177-foot-high retention structure on the North Fork Toutle River upstream of its confluence with the Green River. Continuation of planning and engineering was initiated in December 1984. It included a comparative analysis of risks, benefits and costs, and design, at an equal level of detail, of a single stage sediment retention structure (SRS), a staged SRS, and dredging program. A Decision Document, submitted to ASA (CW) in October 1985, recommended construction of a single stage.Sediment Retention Structure with a 125-foot spillway. This document affirmed earlier Department of the Army conclusions. The plan also includes a levee modification at Kelso, and dredging in the Cowlitz River. Continuation of Planning and Engineering was completed in FY 86 at a total cost of $4,644,200. A General Design Memorandum and a Feature Design Memorandum (Hydrology and Meteorology) were completed in FY 1985. Other Feature Design Memoranda initiated in FY 1985 and completed in FY 86 were Real Estate, Geology and Foundations, Concrete Materials and Construction Techniques, Embankment and Foundation Excavation. Feature Design Memoranda scheduled to be completed this fiscal year (with percentages complete) are Sedimentation (99%); Reservoir Clearing and Project Roads (96%); Spillway and Outlet Works (50%); Fish Facilities (30%); Sediment Ranges (99%); Dam Instrumentation and Inspection (95%); Initial Filling, Surveillance and Monitoring (10%); and Kelso Levee Improvement (20%). Authorizing legislation was contained in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Federal Government and the sponsors was signed on April 26, 1986. Initial construction funding was authorized on July 2, 1986, in the FY 86 Urgent Supplemental Appropriations Bill. A Sediment Retention Structure site clearing contract was awarded in September 1986 to initiate construction. 37-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 1. Bonneville Navigation New Work Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles OR 8. Columbia River, Ilwaco, WA 9. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost 130,000 6,451,000 6,581,000 - 6,396,070 6,396,070 - - - - 2,043,7131 - - - - 2.043,7131 535,500 361,300 475,000 552,000 4,819,426 537,204 361,560 472,802 554,702 4,818,735 - - - - 28,349,3042 - - - - 28,349,3042 15,812,000 20,815,100 15,213,000 11,459,400 236,147,5263 17,042,261 20,716,288 15,306,888 11,430,195 236,088,191 - - - - 665,9544 - - - - 665,9544 150,400 137,965 53,150 663,437 - - - 941,252 - - - 941,252 16,500 312,000 438,000 3,035,185 29,861 312,160 438,112 3,035,182 - - - 220,2835 - - - 220,2835 34,500 338,000 594,000 3,643,813 51,058 321,474 605,577 3,638,133 - 7,008,000 -187,772 7,003,593 2,131,100 5,744,000 2,191,396 5,771,078 177,000 191,730 938 347,900 352,944 7,250,000 7,243,987 - 24,913,6616 - 24,913,6616 8,911,415 84,291,0997 8,818,651 84,179,419' - 7,322,878 - - 7,322,878 - - - - 5,989,5098 - - - - 5,989,5098 189,000 188,400 663,000 429,000 11,266,9489 187,748 190,017 652,345 438,416 11,265,6609 - 22,500 1,384,500 38,000 1,590,000 26,614 20,374 1,362,243 60,683 1,589,231 - - - - 29,750,09210 - - - - 29,750,09210 2,263,000 2,971,940 5,042,000 3,041,000 59,224,65211 3,269,372 2,992,359 4,974,845 3,085,466 59,200,46311 - - - - 2,335,966 - - - - 2,335,966 37-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Contributed Funds) New Work 10. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR 11. Coquille River, OR 13. Depoe Bay, OR 13. Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama WA 15. Nehalem Bay, OR 16. Port Orford, OR 18. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 19. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 136,400 121,900 122,851 135,609 486,680 486,680 - - 350,23812 - - 350,23812 49,000 170,000 1,694,010 43,230 175,970 1,693,095 - - - - 693,36613 - - - - 693,36613 167,600 191,400 426,000 333,000 5,043,94414 172,074 193,508 418,273 341,125 5,043,55014 2,000 2,464 89,700 89,446 45,000 41,976 55,000 52,512 27,000 29,397 18,000 239,000 14,878 245,146 367,364 367,364 747,876 747,318 302,000 302,000 302,00615 302,00615 55,195 55,195 550,000 126,000 - - 12,088,000 922,899 134,975 5,724 15,777 12,086,751 - - - - 758,69216 - - - - 758,69216 191,000 365,900 392,000 208,000 2,404,329 198,364 365,818 389,311 210,184 2,403,635 - - - - 4,156,25217 - - - - 4,156,25217 1,044,500 387,700 1,000,000 354,000 8,328,72018 796,151 677,713 985,538 368,738 8,326,97418 4,999,813 287,947 504,000 503,248 8,000,000 12,713,495 719,900 723,964 12,900,000 12,915,368 646,000 641,001 2,081,000 1,821,733 581,000 584,714 635,783 635,783 29,465,21219 29,201,59219 10,484,09920 10,482,49720 879,285 879,285 37-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Contributed Funds) 20. Skamokawa Creek, WA 21. Skipanon Channel, OR 22. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 23. Umpqua River, OR 24. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 25. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 26. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 45,000 -1,500 534,100 214,238 68,800 74,903 -50,000 13,654 413,000 503,589 45,000 90,000 - 100,000 143 98,845 1,394 412,532 412,532 2,400 2,400 383,782 383,782 - - - 280,854 - - - 280,854 80,500 336,000 292,000 2,829,014 403,165 334,934 291,905 2,827,820 31,000 217,000 32,593 205,228 9,851 827,700 829,517 - 22,434,82721 - 22,434,82721 59,000 2,917,79022 68,044 2,914,87022 - - 2,839,799 - - 2,839,799 - 47,500 17,766,37723 161 10,902 17,729,77923 604,000 956,000 21,407,989 580,834 965,341 21,393,940 - - - - 2,500,677 - - - - 2,500,677 - - - - 520,00525 - - - - 520,00525 720,000 528,000 501,000 496,000 13,958,82325 537,797 710,319 480,860 510,761 13,945,98625 - - - - 234,794 - - - - 234,794 - - - - 19,242,04626 - - - - 19,242,04626 1,085,100 1,493,400 1,131,000 493,000 18,675,30227 1,089,700 1,494,202 1,094,881 523,138 18,667,81127 - - - - 12,005 - - - - 12,005 291,000 971,353 30,000 189,499 31,300 111,836 9,300 91,642,489 47,546 91,623,488 37-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 27. Blue River Lake, OR 28. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 29. Dorena Lake, OR 30. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 31. Fall Creek Lake, OR 32. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 36. John Day River (West), OR 38. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR & WA 39. Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA 40. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control Castle Rock, WA 42. West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR 44. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work 623,500 512,000 580,000 550,000 2,756,700 474,474 650,948 590,699 556,380 2,754,301 - - - - 32,038,22528 - - - - 32,038,22528 221,600 180,000 151,000 213,000 1,913,991 246,991 184,659 147,919 219,165 1,912,534 - - - - 4,013,12329 - - - - 4,013,12329 537,698 673,000 623,000 708,000 7,978,67830 607,162 655,509 605,928 730,380 7,961,75430 354,286 307,200 342,935 1,350,000 1,389,366 1,200 1,600 342,000 342,563 - - 14,568,26231 - - 14,568,26231 352,000 382,000 4,420,174 328,889 405,563 4,417,534 3,500 10,000,000 32,226,000 54,092,579 -8,100 4,773,965 20,345,020 36,948,495 - - - - 22,118,26432 - - - - 22,118,26432 241,000 270,000 235,000 255,000 4,046,415 296,904 269,304 232,116 258,853 4,045,259 - - - - 8,526,93533 16,958 77 - - 8,526,93533 905,000 937,000 742,000 847,000 10,164,63434 961,183 958,097 745,135 856,543 10,160,15834 122,300 122,291 5,500 5,509 127,800 127,800 1,700,000 2,600,000 1,000,000 2,850,000 20,574,745 1,710,021 2,458,996 1,149,563 2,840,161 20,561,949 Approp. 15,730,000 10,345,000 6,133,000 6,280,000 38,488,000 Cost 7,557,368 18,267,493 6,232,116 6,347,141 38,404,118 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 1,400,000 1,400,000 - 1,365,665 1,365,665 178,000 175,012 2,988 178,000 178,000 1,050,000 624,500 744,000 343,000 24,308,81635 1,086,098 636,359 760,094 300,794 24,231,36935 37-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 45. Willow Creek Lake, OR 46. Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, OR and WA 47. Cougar Lake, OR 48. Detroit Lake, OR 49. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 50. Hills Creek Lake, OR 51. John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 52. 'Lookout Point Lake, OR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 160,000 165,055 56,600 178,000 62,436 179,056 96,000 3,541,544 95,917 3,540,987 (See Walla Walla, WA District) 86,000 498,000 382,000 83,904 467,009 405,626 21,456,000 12,200,000 21,390,863 12,032,268 7,350,600 8,820,000 8,369,863 8,478,177 15,000 8,233 682,000 716,706 6,241 860,000 861,133 17,530,000 17,905,137 10,468,000 10,848,327 492 966,000 956,539 14,826,000 753,296,60436 14,958,973 753,209,71936 12,994,000 130,270,10137 12,979,585 130,001,69237 - 58,636,39338 34 58,636,39338 731,000 1,141,000 9,530,816 733,379 1,153,266 9,529,297 - - - - 62,729,698 - - - - 62,729,698 1,232,000 1,789.000 1,411,000 1,456,000 23,860,77249 1,312,198 1,757,050 1,426,060 1,435,467 23,820,11949 - - - - 363,086 - - - - 363,086 - - - - 84,005,78839 - - - - 84,005,78839 1,423,000 1,694,000 1,550,143 1,679,567 1,810,000 1,688,000 20,053,13240 1,825,339 1,667,370 20,024,91740 - - - - 45,700,619 - - - - 45,700,619 693,900 591,000 457,000 446,000 7,019,26741 747,486 641,968 442,717 457,531 7,015,87241 1,298,000 1,597,688 9,506,100 10,647,483 -45,000 53,108 10,624,000 9,103,019 9,746,000 9,956,705 6,483,000 8,046,653 10,633,000 10,663,086 8,685,000 8,665,982 6,125,000 6,257,535 509,936,24642 509,839,43242 90,374,15943 90,225,77343 - 138,000 4,450,000 11,743,000 18,669 167,842 4,418,339 11,707,633 - 88,238,39544 - 88,238,39544 37-28 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 53. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 54. The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, WA and OR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,092,100 2,348,000 2,119,000 2,194,000 33,914,60545 2,356,652 2,332,882 2,138,429 2.156,310 33,834,65145 250,000 537,648 'Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. gIncludes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 'Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. "Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393 Entrance to Oregon Slough; $161,897, Camas- Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 'Includes $2,033,408 under Code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 1�Includes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. "Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 1 Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, OR; includes $8,000 for previous project. 3Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. Includes $36,000 under Code 711. "Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 5SExcludes $304,826 contributed funds. '6Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. "Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. "gIncludes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. egIncludes $1,159,357 for previous project. "0Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. - 290,000 235,687 271,310 4,700 136,408,150 7,270 136,391,678 ,300 2,105,000 2,600,000 2,420,000 16,863,80046 ,181 2,100,169 2,522,379 2,466,125 16,809.55046 - - - 301,064,28847 - - - - 301,064,28847 ,000 6,201,000 7,606,000 8,927,000 82,970,00848 ,701 5,840,781 7,851,423 9,027,285 82,875,45148 21Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592, 622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 22Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 23Includes $39,242 for previous project and $58,824 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Winchester Bay and Schofield River, OR. Excludes $267,500 contributed funds. 24Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 25Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 26Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 27Includes $6,026 for previous project. 28Inlcudes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 29Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30lncludes $167,878 special recreation use fees. 31Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 2Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 33Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds constributed). 34Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. 35Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 36Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recovery Act funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $436,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,332,504 expended second powerhouse funds; $6,000 alloted $6,000 expended, power units funds. 37Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 37-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 38Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 39Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Sweet Home Lake. 40Includes $131,900 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 41 Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 42Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. "Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 allotted under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 4Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 45Includes $131,900 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 46Includes $131,900 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 47Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15-22 funds. 48Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 37-30 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 15, 1985 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 4, 1981 3. Feb. 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 4, 19232 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1927 July 3, 1930 Sep. 6, 19333 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 1. 2. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Construction of a new navigation lock just south of existing lock. CHETCO RIVER, OR 'Topbro vide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35-foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. 37-31 P.L. 99-88 H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess? H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.1 No Prior Report. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess?. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6 73d Cong., 1st Sess? H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess? H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.? REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 11, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1905 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Sep. 3, 1954 July 30, 1983 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East channel Main channel. West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.? Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide by 800 feet long. H. Doc. 630, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess? H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 98-63 H. Committee Doc. 94, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. 37-32 5. 7. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 Dec. 31, 1970 June 3, 1896 June 30, 1948 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, ILWACO, WA. Deepening of the channel a distance of 3 miles to provide improved access to the Ilwaco small boat basin. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft. depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft. will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. 37-33 TABLE 37-B (Continued) Section 107, P.L. 86-645, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Oct. 22, 1984. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess? S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess? S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 237, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. S. Doc 124, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess? H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 10. 11. 12. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. KALAMA TURNING BASIN, KALAMA, WA 15. 16. July 14, 1960 Provides a turning basin 40 feet deep. July 25, 1912 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 31, 1970 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct. 1, 1980 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 26, 1912 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 NEHALEM BAY, OR Two rubble-stone jetties. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot South Jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of North Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, at low water between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep,.200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. 37-34 TABLE 37-B (Continued) Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 7, 1986 H. Doc. 623, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367 H. Doc. 3, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess ? H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess,. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.? 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 23. Oct. 27, 1965 Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 June 26, 19346 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty. A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.5 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks.8 YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. 37-35 TABLE 37-B (Continued) S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess? Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess' S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3d Sess' S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess' H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess? Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 24. 25. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct. 7, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 July 24, 1946 37. May 17, 1950 38. May 17, 1950 APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. 27. 28. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorizes construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. JOHN DAY RIVER (WEST), OR Construction of riprap bank protection. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. 37-36 TABLE 37-B (Continued) 26. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Section 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 25, 1985 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 29. 30. 31. 32. 36. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 30, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 July 24, 1946 June 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 20, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Aug. 22, 1984 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 39. P.L. 98-63 P.L. 99-88 40. 42. 43. 37-37 TABLE 37-B (Continued) MT. ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, WA Implement and maintain flood control measures on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers to assure flood protection for developed areas in the vicinity of such rivers against a one-hundred-year flood and to reduce sedimentation flow and the chance of blockage on the Columbia River. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. WEST MAKINSTER ROAD, WILSON RIVER, OR Construction of riprap protection. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. General improvements. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-BONNEVILLE LAKE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville Project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power. Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 3, 1985 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 21, 1933) Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 98-396 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 P.L. 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 49. 54. May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 24, 1965 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 Sep. 21, 1962 Oct 15, 1966 Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green-Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green-Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. John Day waterfowl management area. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 'Contains latest published maps. 2Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3Public Works Administration 4Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5Inactive. 6Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 7Flood Control Act. 8Classified deferred. 9Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-38 TABLE 37-B (Continued) P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 S. Doc 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 50. 51. 52. 53. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR Astoria Turning Basin, OR' Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR Clatskanie River, OR2 Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA2 Depoe Bay, OR1 Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR1 Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR2 Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), OR2 Salmon River, OR 2 Smith River, OR2 South Channel, Government Island, OR South Slough (Charleston), OR1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR10 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA 11 Umatilla Harbor, OR12 Westport Slough, OR2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR' Yaquina River, OR1 Yaquina River, OR Youngs and Klaskanine River, OR Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 1Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 2Channel adequate for present commerce. 3Includes $15,537 for previous project. 4Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. gExcludes $86,586 contributed funds. 7Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1985 1975 1963 1971 1971 1941 1977 1961 1963 1983 1985 1982 1963 1949 1974 1985 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1984 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 277,436 329,423 15,384 145,5885 18,6416 2,500 519,0907 1,154,1628 15,281 2,700 58,132 4,000 25,000 437,6699 6,000 16,881 2,145 143,120 221,80016 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,69513 195,31314 28,800 2,000 26,237 - - - 194,8934 1,474,036 32,768 16,648 35,670 58,127 685,677 90,514 205,130 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 749,69415 1979 9,348 34,449 1�Project abandoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 11Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 12Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 13Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. "4Excludes $50,565 contributed funds. "SExcludes $3,000 contributed funds. 1"Includes $102,000 contributed funds. 37-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 43,150 Diking Dist 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 - Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 - Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1962 181,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,7743 - Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,0344 - Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 211,160 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 - Port of Kalama, WA1 Completed - 99,844 - Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 - Scappoose Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,991,558 - Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 - Wahkiakum County Consolidated Completed 1985 5,289,833 - Diking District No. 1, WA Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 - Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 - State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA Completed 1985 504,64213 37-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 117,143 Warrenton Diking District 3, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 - Total Columbia River Basin 16,399,775 - LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 2, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 121,165 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 - Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA Completed 1985 250,000 - Total Cowlitz River Basin 442,735 - LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 - Columbia Drainage District 1, OR Inactive - - - Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 - Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA' Completed - 236,860 - Deer Island Drainage District, OR Inactive - - - Hayden Island, OR Inactive 1950 - - Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 - Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499,186 - Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 - Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 - Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,0125 - Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 - Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 - Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 37-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, WA Woodson Drainage District, OR Total Lower Columbia River Basin WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Cascadia Lake, OR Gate Creek Lake, OR Holley Lake, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR1 Shelton Ditch, OR Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Total Willamette River Basin ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR9 Bear Creek, Medford, OR1 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR1 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR2 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR 11 (a)Riverside Area Units (b)State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c)State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR' 0 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Rogue River, OR1 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR1 Completed Completed Completed Deferred Deferred Deferred Completed Inactive 1973 1964 1960 1976 1972 1963 1967 Inactive 1,803,488 162,500 11,928,364 1,214,3006 1,066,114' 840,0008 241,992 276,700 39,624 3,678,731 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,84510 1,307,216 22,963 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,71612 86,230 288,447 435,00014 215,939 176,351 92,500 Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1981 1985 1967 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1961 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Tualatin, OR Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR1 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR1 Total All Other Flood Control 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act funds. 4Excludes $25,000 contributed funds. SPrevious completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 'Includes $112,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Sweet Home. 8Includes $95,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 9Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887. '�Excludes $2,520 contributed funds. "Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974. 12Excludes $230,070 constributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 37-43 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 30,000 7,965,985 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Contri- Full Report Date Federal buted See Annual Deauth- Funds Funds Project Report For orized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR - 1977 Bachelor Island, WA - 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 Clatsop County, Diking District 4, OR - 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement Dist. 1, OR - 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR - 1977 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 Lake River Delta Area, WA - 1977 Lewis River Area, WA - 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR - 1977 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA - 1977 Turner Prarie, Mill Creek, OR - 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR - 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR - 1960 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR - 1961 37-44 - 4,559 11,595 268 18,543 4,472 258 8,824 21,352 908 - 11,095 6,819 6,465 23,754 210,220 55,594 774 43,292 4,558 125 11,318 5,000 24,145 4,056 112,000 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1986 (See Section 3 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 26,235,146 234,760,144 260,995,290 Public Works 446,296 14,515 460,811 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 26,819,891 234,873,327 261,693,218 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 - 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 27,485,845 234,897,647 262,383,492 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1986) Astoria Deep Draft Anc, OR $29,190 Columbia River, Kalama, WA 32,400 Columbia River, Longview, WA 38,423 Columbia River, Reed Island, OR and WA 7,500 Columbia River (DDA), Vancouver WA 15,577 Columbia River, Willow Bar, OR and WA 7,500 Coquille River, Bandon, OR 24,954 SKamokawa Creek, WA 500 TOTAL $156,044 TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Depoe Bay, OR April 1986 Tillamook, OR September 1986 Willamette River, OR February/Sept. 1986 Youngs Bay, OR January 1986 TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 24 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet1 Lift of Each Lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22.5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of Foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. 3The dam is owned by private parties. 37-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1986) Clatskanie River, OR $ 7,500 Clatsop County Drainage District Nos. 2 and 5, OR 587 Deschutes River, Bend, OR 25,848 Libby Dike, Coos County, OR 56,320 Salmon Creek Levee, Oakridge, OR 32,319 Tucker and Battle Creeks Dike, OR 413 Umatilla at Riverside, OR 7,266 Warrenton Diking Dist. I, OR 154,117 Youngs River Dike No. 22, OR 15,865 TOTAL $ 300,235 37-46 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section in Text 26. 27. 28. 47. 48. 29. 31. 32. 49. 49. Hills Creek Lake, OR Lookout Point Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR Project Applegate Lake, OR Blue River Lake, OR Cottage Grove Lake, OR Cougar Lake, OR Detroit Lake, OR Dorena Lake, OR .Fall Creek Lake, OR Fern Ridge Lake, OR Foster Lake, OR Green Peter Lake, OR 37-47 50. 52. 53. Date of Peak Inflow February 18, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 October 23, 1985 November 7, 1985 November 15, 1985 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 23, 1986 February 18, 1986 Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. 7,550 11,470 6,030 15,060 54,480 16,480 13,660 10,020 24,700 8,580 10,360 9,210 40,010 21,290 33,560 15,650 Storage Used Acre/Feet 19,130 34,000 18,070 59,190 127,850 45,360 43,180 34,960 23,010 23,890 13,600 9,860 127,780 71,910 130,100 41,500 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-N LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 37 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1986 Beaver Drainage District, OR Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA Midland Drainage District, OR Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Scappoose Drainage District, OR Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, WA Woodson Drainage District, OR Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds Estimated Non-Federal Cost Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatskanie River Area, OR (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, OR (Inactive) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, OR (Inactive) Hayden Island, OR (Inactive) John Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, WA (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Lewis River Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (Inactive) 1Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-48 $ 2,857,366 363,000 65,345 304,794 1,661,367 304,511 1,499,186 3,197,000 593,945 15,0561 674,137 3,567,248 5,289,833 162,500 20,555,288 3,300,000 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 43 in Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost (1986) Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin ' * Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River 4 s Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries6 Channel Improvements for Flood Control Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River' ' Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork' Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie' 3 Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River' Dorena Lake, Row River' Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River,' Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin 3 5 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam' 4 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Holley Lake, Calapooya Rivers Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, OR Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork' Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzieXModification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork, Willamette River May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. and July 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104 86th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. $ 32,038,2252 104,000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3003 4,013,1232 9 56,750,4052 10 62,729,6982 14,568,2622 9 22,118,2642 9 8,526,9352 9 127,000,000 (1980) 84,005,7882 45,700,6192 13,300,000 (1960) 5,670,000 88,238,3952 9 102,000,000 37-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-0 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN (Continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 43 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorizing Act Cost (1986) Willamette River Bank Protection1 June 22, 1936, Special Report 31,300,000 Division Engr., June 28, (1985) 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 1See individual reports for details of the project. 7Does not include Reclassified Locations. 2Actual cost. sAuthorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 3For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz 85-820. Creek Lake. 9Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 4For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet (710). Home Lake. 10Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection 5Project classified deferred. costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar 6Project classified inactive. Additional Units. 37-50 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-P PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam, OR and WA-Lake Bonneville (See Section 46 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA-Lake Umatilla (See Section 51 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height Above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Pool Elevation (NormalXAbove Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length Length (Second Powerhouse) Width Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) Height (Roof to BedrockXSecond Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 Cubic Feet Per Second 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 190 Feet 235 190 Feet 200 Feet 1-4,000 kw 2 @ 43,200 kw each 8 @ 54,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,076,600 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 Feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Tainter 50 Ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 37-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 37-P PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION (Continued) LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project The Dalles Lock and Dam, WA and OR-Lake Celilo (See Section 54 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net Clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened to navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 276 500,000 Ac.-Ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 Miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 Feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each Additional 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-52 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA.................. 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ............... 3. Ediz Hook, WA ....................... 4. Edmonds Harbor, WA ................. 5. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, W A ........................... 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ........................... 7. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA ...... 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ....... 9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ......................... 10. Olympia Harbor, WA .................. 11. Project Condition Surveys .............. 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA ................. 13. Quillayute River, WA ................. 14. Seattle Harbor, WA ................... 15. Swinomish Channel, WA ............... 16. Tacoma Harbor, WA ................... 17. Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA ..................... 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA .................... Beach Erosion Control 19. Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization ......................... Flood Control 20. Dungeness River, Sequim, WA .......... 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ........... 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... 23. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works .... 24. Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, WA 25. Mud Mountain Dam, WA.............. . 26. Placer Creek, ID ................... ... 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. Page 38-2 38-2 38-2 38-2 28. Stillaguamish River, WA........ 29. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA .... 30. Wynoochee Lake, WA........... Multiple-Purpose Projects, 38-3 Including Power 31. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ........... 38-3 32. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods 38-4 Lake, WA ..................... 38-4 33. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT 38-4 General Investigations 38-5 34. Surveys................. 38-5 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 38-5 36. Continuation of Planning 38-5 and Engineering ......... 38-6 38-6 Tables Qc) -- Page ....... 38-9 ....... 38-10 ....... 38-10 ....... 38-10 ....... 38-10 ....... 38-11 ............. 38-11 ............. 38-12 ............. 38-12 7O-I Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 38-14 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 38-19 38-7 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 38-25 38-8 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 38-26 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple 38-8 Purpose Projects, Including Power ...................... 38-30 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 38-30 38-8 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 38-8 Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam ............... 38-31 38-8 Table 38-I Project Condition Surveys ...... 38-31 38-9 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public 38-9 Law 80-858 .................. 38-32 38-9 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control 38-9 Activities - Public Law 99, 84th Congress .................... 38-32 38-9 38-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; and mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in July 1957, excluding the inactive portion and inner portion of boat basin. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1958.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, WA, revised 1976). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel conditions surveys. Channel sediments were analyzed to determine suitability of dredged material for open-water disposal. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $120,000. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. Project was completed in February 1961. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, WA, revised 1976.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 lineal feet of rock revetment and 3,100 lineal feet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 17 docks, wharves, and piers in Port Angeles protected by Ediz Hook, of which nine are public. Four of the private docks are operated by timber mills for transfer of logs, pulp and fuel. There are five general cargo/log docks, a ferry dock, three moorage docks (including docks for the Coast Guard and pilots), a fish unloading dock, and three log dump piers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Annual inspection and coordination with local sponsor. 4. EDMONDS HARBOR, WA Location. On easterly shore of Puget Sound in northwestern Washington, about 9 miles north of Seattle and immediately north of Edward's Point. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6445.) Existing Project. Maintenance of breakwaters and entrance channel of small-boat harbor, at estimated cost of 38-2 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT $5,000 annually. Project consists of mooring basin about 600 feet wide and 1,100 feet long, varying from 8 to 13 feet deep; a rubblemound breakwater about 1,850 feet long and with a top elevation of 18.5 feet, extending along southerly and westerly sides of basin; a rock-reinforced treated pile and plank breakwater about 250 feet long, extending from shore along northerly side of basin; an entrance channel 13 feet deep and about 610 feet long, with a minimum width of 65 feet between deep water in the Sound and the basin; and the necessary navigation lights. Project was constructed by local interests and completed in April 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that the Port of Edmonds was not in compliance with "open to all on equal terms" provision, requiring termination of a breakwater repair contract in FY 1985. Compliance to this provision was reinstated in FY 1986. Requirements are described in full on page 1601 of FY 1966 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Two wharves and 4 pleasure craft handling facilities at Edmonds Harbor. One wharf is publicly owned and operated as a ferry terminal, the other, privately owned, is a gravel-unloading facility. There is also a Port-operated and-owned small-boat basin. These facilities, with exception of the small-boat basin, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded in September for repair of the Federally-maintained south rubblestone breakwater, providing for approximately 11,500 tons of armor rock with scheduled completion in November 1986. 5. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. Project was completed in April 1963, excluding the deleted and deferred portions. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. The rest are at Bayside and the Snohomish River. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $155,600. Maintenance, contract: A dredging contract to maintain the Upper Snohomish River channel and settling basin was awarded in August 1986. Contract provides for dredging approximately 205,000 cubic yards and disposal at three upland sites. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range 38-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in March 1965 excluding deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring companyowned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. Refer to Port Series No. 35, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina accomplished dredging in South Reach in October 1985, removing 67,625 cubic yards of material at a cost of $287,042. The Corps hopper dredge Essayons accomplished dredging in Crossover Channel in October and November 1985, removing 95,711 cubic yards of material at a cost of $237,120. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner and outer harbors was completed in June 1986 at a cost of $2,704,716 with 1,752,624 cubic yards of material being removed. 7. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area, King County, WA, involves a 15-foot-deep channel which would consist of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800- foot-long transition channnel with a 24 � 30-foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nesting area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests during construction. Project was completed in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Performed maintenance on the Canadian goose nesting area (project migitation) in February 1986. A maintenance dredging contract was advertised with bid opening for dredging approximately 32,000 cubic yards. of shoal material in FY 87. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $30,000. 8. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. Refer to Port Series No. 36, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 20,000 commercial and 65,000 pleasure vessels, and 2,200,000 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed 500,000 fish and there were more than 860,000 project visitors. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $30,000. Major Rehabilitation. New work: Contract for construction of a new Emergency Closure System and rehabilitation of the downstream guard gate continues and is scheduled for completion in May 1987. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 38-4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Gooseberry Point Small Boat Harbor, Hale Passage, WA, $17,297; Oak Harbor Marina, WA, $152,604; Sandy Point Harbor, Whatcom County, WA, -$164. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 91 acres, maintaining 5 acres of fiberglass bottom screens, and adding 0.43 acres of fiberglass bottom screen at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; rototilling 10 acres of lake bottom to dislodge milfoil roots at Osoyoos Lake, WA; rototilling 5 acres of river bottom to dislodge milfoil roots in preparation for planting the beneficial aquatic plant, dwarf spikerush, at Pend Oreille River, WA. The FY 1986 work also included treatment effectiveness and carry-over studies, cooperation with the University of Washington on a Grass Carp study, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for fiscal year were $465,775. 10. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA. Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6462.) Existing project. Provides a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend, and a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide. Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1939. Entrance channel and turning basin authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act have been deferred. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report of 1938.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, requires that local interests furnish suitably bulkheaded areas for retention of dredged materials, when and as required. The Port of Olympia advised on January 25, 1949, that it could not comply with requirements at that time, but would do so on earliest possible date. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. Refer to Port Series No. 35, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $100,000. 11. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels, and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Channel centerline markers are inspected for visibility and proper operation in applicable areas frequented by boating traffic consisting mostly of recreationalists. In addition, all subject areas are inspected to insure that they are clean of snags and obstructions. Total costs for fiscal year were $283,237. 12. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441 and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris, considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters. The patrol boat Walton removed floating debris in the greater Seattle vicinity. Together they removed approximately 2,000 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. A brochure describing the PS&TW program and the debris vessel Puget was prepared and distributed during FY 1986. Maintenance, contract: 1,307 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $33,086. Current contractor is recycling some of the debris and placing the remainder in a landfill. 13. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) 38-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Existing project. Provides for: (a) Jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit was nourished in conjunction with channel dredging contracts completed in 1973 and in 1977. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960; however, the channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that the requirement to provide a public landing open to all on equal terms in the boat basin was not complied with between May and July 1981, due to the closure of the Quileute Indian Reservation to the landing of salmon by sport and charter fishermen. Terminal facilities. There are 6 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel during the year. 14. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south of First Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yardscapacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding the settling basin at upstream end which is classified inactive and East Waterway above the 750-foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except for inactive portion of project. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/outfitting/drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. Refer to Port Series No. 36, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $300,800. Maintenance contract: In March 1986, 33,637 cubic yards of contaminated sediment were dredged from the Duwamish Waterway at a cost of $191,249. The material was deposited in a confined water disposal site provided by the Port of Seattle. The annual maintenance dredging of the Duwamish Waterway was completed in July 1986, with the removal of 103,598 cubic yards at a cost of $253,815. 15. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the-Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are 38-6 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading, and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $100,000. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract for clamshell dredging with open-water disposal was awarded in September 1986, with work to commence in November 1986. 16. TACOMA HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14th Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 11th Street, 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. Project was completed in December 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway, and page 1702 of Annual Report of 1944 and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 81 terminal facilities, exclusive of those available to recreational craft, located in Tacoma Harbor which is comprised of Commencement Bay and its many waterways. These facilities serve a variety of purposes which includes cargo handling, fueling small vessels, ferry traffic, marine repair, conversion/ outfitting, dry-docking, mooring, bunkering, ship-building, and shipbreaking. Refer to Port Series No. 35, revised 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were conducted during the year. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $50,000. 17. WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY, WA Location. Canal connects two bays which are arms of Admiralty Inlet on west side of Puget Sound, in northwestern part of Washington, about 40 miles north of Seattle. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 6405.) Existing project. Provides for a canal 15 feet deep, 75 feet wide on the bottom, and about 4,800 feet long, and for construction of jetties to protect channel at southern or Oak Bay end, and a bulkhead for retention of dredged material. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.3 feet in Port Townsend Bay and 9.4 feet in Oak Bay. Extreme tidal range is 16 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None directly served by the canal. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. 18. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram lumber mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. 38-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The local sponsor has now obtained funding to dredge Tokeland Boat Basin moorage area which will permit maintenance dredging of the boat basin access channel. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; one of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Conducted ocean disposal study. Beach Erosion 19. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 84-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA, were $24,422. Flood Control 20. DUNGENESS RIVER, SEQUIM, WA Location. The project is located in Clallam County on the right bank of the Dungeness River, 4.5 miles southwest of Sequim, WA, in Carlsborg Lake Quadrangle SW1/4 sec. 1,T. 29 N., R. 4 W. Existing project. Protection of the access road (210 feet), near the intake structure for the water system, consists of a riprap blanket 36 inches thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 10-foot-wide, 4-foot-thick weighted riprap toe with gravel fill to reconstruct the required 1:2 embankment slope. A concrete block wall, back filled with quarry spalls, protects the waterline and access road (150 feet). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Project fiscally completed. Construction was physically complete in September 1985. 21. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Wash.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works stilling basin was inspected. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. Maintenance, contract: Settlement of the fill for the relocated Burlington Northern Railway between stations 10989 and 10991 was under continued surveillance. The deferred construction period has been extended to cover this area to observe effect of remedial work. (Improvements to the drainage system have apparently stabilized the railroad fill.) Contracts awarded during the fiscal year: generator set replacement in the amount of $38,500 and exploratory drilling in the amount of $84,600. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests; and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Dungeness River at Sequim, Sammamish River, Shelton Creek, Stillaguamish River and Yakima River, all in Washington State; Coeur d'Alene, and St. Maries projects in Idaho. Streambank vegetation evaluations were made at Omak and Oroville and on the Green River in Washington. 51 Section 14 bank protection projects in WA, ID and MT were inspected in conjunction with flood control projects. Fiscal year costs were $76,297. Costs to date have been $673,111. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Inspections are made of levees that have been rehabilitated under Public Law 84-99. Inspections involve determining condition of levees, riprap displacement and vegetative control. Local sponsors are advised of results and recommendations. Inspections made this fiscal year were on the Olympic Peninsula, the Nooksack, Cedar- Green, Puyallup, Spokane, and Yakima Rivers in 38-8 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Washington State, the St. Joe, Coeur d'Alene, and Pend Oreille Rivers in Idaho, and the Clark Fork, Flathead, and Kootenai Rivers in Montana. Fiscal year costs were $42,666. Total costs to date have been $165,613. 24. MIDDLE FORK NOOKSACK RIVER, DEMING, WA Location. The project is to protect Rutsatz Road, a Whatcom County roadway which is adjacent to the Middle Fork Nooksack River, 2 miles southeast of Deming, WA, in Deming Lake Quadrangle SW1/4 sec. 5, T. 38 N., R. 5 E. Existing Project. A 400-lineal-foot bank protection project consisting of riprap 42 inches thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 12-foot-wide, 5-foot-thick weighted riprap toe. A minimum of 12 inches filter material is required between the natural bank and the riprap blanket. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. New work hired labor: Work includes initial appraisal, plans and specifications, and construction. Construction by equipment rental began on 21 May 1986 and was physically complete on 2 July 1986, at a cost of $79,000, Federal funds. 25. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Approximately 1,000 fish are transported annually from the fish collection facility. Engineering work continued on investigation and evaluation of a seepage problem in dam core. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Completed General Design Memorandum in July 1986. Prepared plans and specifications and awarded contract for construction of resident engineer's facility. New work, contract: Contract for resident engineer's facility was awarded in July 1986 in the amount of $311,000 and 60% complete. Contract for exploratory drilling in the amount of $159,169 was awarded and completed during the FY. Total expenditures were $1,326,358. A Feature Design Memorandum for correcting earthquake and debris blockage deficiences in the intake tower will be prepared in FY 1987. 26. PLACER CREEK, ID Location. Placer Creek rises in the St. Joe Mountains of northern Idaho, flows northerly about 7.8 miles, and discharges into the South Fork of Coeur d'Alene River at the city of Wallace. Existing project. Provides for flood control by construction of a 3,700-foot-long concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace. A debris basin capable of storing 17,000 cubic yards of debris is located upstream from the channel to prevent plugging of the channel. Project was physically complete in September 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-10 of Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: A flood warning system contract was completed. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee Project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $180,960. 28. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places 38-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to remove brush on 9,000 linear feet of 4 segments. Repaired 3 segments with gravel and riprap. 29. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 lineal feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project will be provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to remove brush and trees on approximately 20,000 lineal feet. Rental equipment was used to redress and crown the levee road on the left bank. 30. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. The project tank truck hauled upstream migrant fish past the dam. Maintenance, contract: Contract for spillway gate repainting in the amount of $96,188 is 99% complete. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 31. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravitystructure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acrefeet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: A $50,000 debris facility rehabilitation contract was awarded in September 1986 to repair damage from a June 1986 storm. The shop-storage building contract was completed. Work continued on the station service circuit breaker contract and boundary monumentation. 32. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at river mile 545, just upstream from mouth 38-10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 64,000 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,069,000 kilowatts. Pool raising to elevation 956 was completed in 1981 which increased the powerplant capability to 2,482,000 kilowatts. Project providing initial 16 power units was completed in FY 1961. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Generator units 17 through 27 are producing power; however, additional work will be required to bring turbine efficiency up to design standards. Construction of structural modifications to dam and powerhouse, installation of additional units, uprating and plant modernization of units 1-16, and other miscellaneous project work is approximately 93 percent complete. Estimated cost of current construction project is $387,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts were awarded for Bridgeport State Park, Phase II, and relocation of public access in powerhouse. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included generator stator rewind, installation and fire protection, transformers, governor system, station service system, 15 kV circuit breakers, turbine cavitation, main unit excitation system, powerhouse shops, mobile sealing inspection unit, and wildlife mitigation: mule deer study and mitigation evaluation. Contracts completed during the fiscal year included warehouse addition and sandblast building ($1,154,400), O&M maintenance building and dock ($252,530), and spillway gate deficiencies ($3,635,825). Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Contracts awarded during the fiscal year included: stator laminations in the amount of $76,230, and miscellaneous replacement parts orders. 33. LIBBY DAM-LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai with Columbia River. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River Basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units with provision for four additional units, one of which is currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River Basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Payment for damage claims was made in the amount of $64,000 for Libby downstream effects in Kootenai Flats, ID. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Contract in the amount of $23,942 was awarded to fabricate a lifting beam for the dam gantry crane. Contract in the amount of $24,180 was awarded for the treaty tower floor repair. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam Powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is complete; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment is limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is 99% complete. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Contracts for turbines and generators continued. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 82, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $203,635 for navigation studies, $166,936 for flood damage prevention studies, $349,809 for comprehensive studies, $4,538 for review of authorized projects, $66,731 for miscellaneous activities and $36,590 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $828,239. 38-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Board of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $2,945 for international water studies, $108,942 for flood plain management services, and $4,260 for hydrologic studies, a total of $116,147. 36. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Tacoma Harbor, Pierce County, is located in southern Puget Sound at Tacoma, WA, about 30 miles south of Seattle. The proposed plan of improvement provides for (a) modification of the existing Federal project for Blair Waterway to provide for the construction and maintenance of a 45-foot and a 41-foot channel including replacement of the East 11th Street Bridge and (b) Federal maintenance of the locally constructed Sitcum Waterway to depths of 40 and 35 feet. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included environmental coordination on contaminated sediments and contracting with the Washington State Department of Transportation for bridge replacement evaluations. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,640,000. Fiscal year costs were $194,893. Total costs to date have been $855,481, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County, west central Washington. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. The proposed plan of improvement would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include: an earthen levee 22,500 feet long roughly following the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis; 2,200 feet of concrete floodwall in two industrial areas; five pumping stations and tide gates; and 10 smaller gravity drain culverts with flap gates. The levee would protect 1,318 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included hydrologic, hydraulic, and economic studies, preparation of preliminary design and cost estimates, and Fish and Wildlife coordination. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,097,000. Fiscal year costs were $276,930. Total costs to date have been $760,764. East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Seattle Harbor, WA, an authorized project, includes East, West and Duwamish Waterways within its city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. The proposed plan of improvement includes: Deepening and narrowing East and West Waterways (from 34 x 750 feet to 39 x 500 feet); deepening and widening Duwamish Waterway (from 34 x 200 feet to 39 x 250 feet); replacement of the constrictive Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge with one having 250 feet horizontal clearance; deepening one turning basin to 39 feet; deauthorizing an unneeded turning basin; mitigation for loss of 4 acres shallow-water and 27 acres deep-water fish habitat; creation of 2 acres of shallow-water habitat for fish enhancement; and construction of a public boat ramp for recreation access. Continuation of planning and engineering studies were initiated in October 1984. During the fiscal year the testing for contamination of sediments to be dredged was completed and environmental studies and Fish and Wildlife coordination continued. At the request of the local sponsor, further studies at this time are deferred. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,910,000. Fiscal year costs were $292,320. Total costs to date have been $653,737. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Grays Harbor is a large tidal estuary in southwestern Washington. The entrance is 45 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River and 110 miles south of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The estuary lies entirely within Grays Harbor County, State of Washington. The proposed plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing Federal project for Grays Harbor. The existing 30-foot channel would be deepened to a depth of 46 feet through the Outer Bar and widened in this reach from the existing 600 feet to a 1,000-foot-wide channel; thence, the entrance reach would be widened and deepened from the existing designated 350 feet wide by 30 feet deep channel to a channel tapering landward from 1,000 to 600 feet wide and 46 to 38 feet deep; thence, the existing channel to Cow Point would be widened and deepened from 350 feet wide and 30 feet deep to 400 feet wide by 38 feet deep for the South reach and Crossover reach and to 350 feet wide by 38 feet deep for the Moon Island, Hoquiam, and Cow Point reaches; and thence, the Aberdeen and South Aberdeen reaches would be widened and deepened from the existing designated 200 feet wide by 30 feet deep channels to channels 250 feet wide by 36 feet deep. Two turning basins located at Aberdeen would be constructed and the existing railroad bridge would be replaced with a new bridge having horizontal clearance of 250 feet. During the fiscal year major progress was made on environmental and engineering studies leading to a General 38-12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Design Memorandum (GDM). Based on preliminary results, it appears some project dimensions can be reduced without affecting the project benefits. The final project design will be presented in the GDM which is scheduled for completion in September 1987. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,860,000. Fiscal year costs were $1,100,604. Total costs to date have been $2,964,762. Yakima River at Union Gap, WA The flood plain under study is located between the confluence of the Yakima and Naches Rivers and the community of Union Gap, within Yakima County, in southeastern Washington State. The proposed plan of improvement consists of: Constructing two levees downstream of the Moxee Bridge on the Yakima River (1.1 miles of levee on the west bank and 2.5 miles on the east bank); improving sections of existing 7 miles of levee by raising and providing additional riprap; installation of drainage control gates on existing culverts and flood plain management for unprotected areas. Continuation of Planning and Engineering studies were initiated in October 1984. During the fiscal year detailed hydraulic and economic analyses were completed. These analyses showed that the project is not economically feasible. Study was deferred. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $566,000. Fiscal year costs were $279,388. Total costs to date have been $496,368. No work is scheduled for FY 87. 38-13 TABLE 38-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1984 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Bellingham Harbor WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Edmonds Harbor, WA6 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 279 3,025 3,270 15,000 11,813 - 222,345 - 222,3451 185,000 729,239 175,612 719,851 - 59,523 - 59,523 - 5,000 - 5,000 - 1,566,840 - 1,566,8402 - 1,064,067 3,147 1,064,0273 29,421 29,4214 9,103 9,103 15,000 8,925 855 2,165 - 1,860 - 1,860 80,000 950,000 81,492 947,282 - 122,375 1 111,793 - 160,000 - 5,878,740 - 5,878,7405 -3,140 1,124,860 6,679 1,123,360 12,652 20,000 28,836 396,000 396,000 130,585 129,895 180,000 28,836 - - - - 1,775,744 - - - - 1,775,7447 363,617 792,000 155,000 291,000 7,062,079 363,615 689,169 253,987 294,189 7,061,4238 - - - - 116,618 - - - - 116,618 - - - - 584,090 - - - - 584,090 35,000 35,010 3,289,000 3,289,402 - -9,635 4,347,000 4,252,725 4,339,277 4,243,299 -9,600 5,155,796 36 5,155,7969 3,927,140 78,237,329 3,944,749 78,234,51910 38-14 2. 3. 4. 6. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Contrib. Funds) Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 10. Olympia Harbor, WA 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 13. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 120,592 - 120,592 - 4,606,145 - 4,606,145 - 35,834 - 35,834 - 47,889 -- 47,889 134,000 112,775 946,000 946,00011 134,000 112,775 - - - - 4,803,952 - - - - 4,803,95212 2,851,000 2,999,240 3,595,440 3,755,000 61,123,910 2,856,510 2,936,228 3,560,062 3,778,291 61,018,78013 2,275,000 2,970,000 1,120,230 2,275,220 2,951,805 994,066 - 7,465,230 133,987 7,454,857 100,000 100,000 359,315 359,31514 625,377 625,37715 - - - - 43,337 - - - - 43,337 600,000 593,000 542,500 617,000 16,414,802 601,269 552,674 575,607 612,490 16,403,07316 -310,000 454,000 536,261 501,062 452,875 530,793 - 521,850 - 521,85017 17,000 9,136,022 19,410 9,130,338 - - - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 - - - - 170,335 - - - - 170,335 428,358 405,000 274,000 1,001,000 7,192,746 428,995 398,225 273,308 940,157 7,124,434 38-15 7. 8. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Contrib. Funds) 15. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Tacoma Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA 18. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Dungeness River, WA 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. . Middle Fork Nooksack River, WA 25. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 69,333 69,333 20,000 20,000 70,000 347,760 65,360 352,506 - - 808,332 - - 808,33218 20,000 353,000 5,867,940 19,797 149,813 5,664,323 32,000 32,000 20,000 21,289 - 2,383,891 - 2,383,89119 50,000 1,364,745 50,000 1,364,74520 - 1,144,416 - 1,144,416 - 222,500 - 222,500 - 73,322 - 73,322 - 90,000 - 89,712 60,000 578,000 59,914 573,690 16,500 16,169 84,000 80,542 66,500 43,934 619 326,378 326,378 - 1,579,269 - 1,579,2692' - 13,240,978 4,953 13,238,07722 - 98,372 - 98,372 -19,000 47,500 3,566 47,500 - 37,048,061 - 37,048,061 528,000 515,000 693,049 727,000 9,558,300 527,245 496,871 681,307 616,769 9,417,160 - - - - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000 - - - 79,000 79,000 - - - 79,000 79,000 - - - 1,439,000 14,734,848 - - - 1,326,358 14,622,20623 38-16 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Contrib. Funds) 26. Placer Creek, ID 28. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA 30. Wynoochee Lake, WA 31. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 32. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA 33. Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,136,162 1,138,000 2,967,944 1,230,000 18,190,476 1,110,512 1,118,723 2,937,358 1,272,504 18,145,76924 - - - - 285,908 - - - - 285,908 845,000 390,000 722,954 497,172 20,329 - 3,928 - 3,928 - 5,865,000 1,699 5,865,000 - - - - 220,594 - - - - 220,59425 150,000 155,000 100,000 110,000 1,574,845 142,972 162,671 100,163 110,406 1,574,824 S- - - 21,000 - - - - 21,000 - - - - 3,947,853 - - - - 3,947,85326 40,000 39,947 40,000 39,829 50,000 48,911 40,000 40,851 496,597 496,134 - - - - 23,494,445 - - - - 23,494,44527 908,000 994,500 1,047,877 1,032,000 10,909,446 934,637 963,671 1,027,462 1,020,809 10,844,844 - - - - 31,878,297 - - - - 31,878,29728 1,923,231 2,018,000 2,580,000 2,974,000 28,473,831 1,843,759 2,062,473 2,555,530 2,971,854 28,368,60929 11,900,000 18,200,000 13,990,000 11,023,000 506,091,235 12,088,050 18,292,811 14,012,821 10,091,596 505,110,41630 5,198,000 5,890,000 5,968,576 6,608,000 72,870,511 5,194,095 5,811,108 5,966,340 6,525,685 72,667,89831 - - - - 297,630 - - - - 297,630 6,250,000 1,915,000 830,000 630,000 543,726,14032 6,365,210 1,844,303 853,369 715,232 543,705,99633 2,590,900 2,860,500 2,877,000 3,653,000 25,460,479 2,583,965 2,824,490 2,852,195 3,654,719 25,362,23234 - - - - 1,458,252 - - - - 1,458,252 38-17 TABLE 38-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. 3Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 4Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended and $2,159,633 expended by Port of Bellingham in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 5Includes $1,157,570 preauthorization cost. 6Constructed by local interests. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 7Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 8Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous projects . 9Includes $124,945 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $162,000 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 1"Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $798,135 Emergency Relief Funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. "Includes $148,765 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended. '2Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous projects, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. '3Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. '4Includes $183,257 for previous projects, and $18,000 expended for restudy Fiscal Years 1968-1973. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration Funds expended. 15Includes $14,418 expended for previous projects. "Includes $67,496 appropriated and expended for previous project. 17Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 18Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended and $9,000 expended by Skagit County in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 19Includes $159,584 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration Funds expended. Excludes $62,697, value of work contributed by Port of Tacoma in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 20Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 21Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,557 Emergency Relief Funds expended. 22Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration Funds expended. 23Includes $87,785 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief Funds expended. "Includes $5,000 Advance Procurement Funds expended and $131,900 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 25Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration Funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief Funds expended. "sIncludes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 27Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 28Includes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 29Includes $174,776 Special Recreation Use Fees and $10,000 Advance Procurement Funds, appropriated and expended. Includes $131,900 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 3"Includes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. "Includes $774,561 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 32Includes $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 33Includes $42,201,602 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 34Includes $299,546 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 38-18 TABLE 38-B SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EDMONDS HARBOR, WA Maintenance of rubblemound breakwater, 1,850 feet long, and entrance channel, 13 feet deep, 610 feet long and 65 feet wide. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin.4 GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.2 S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.3 H. Doc. 93-101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 147, 88th Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 89-298 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 38-19 3. 4. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19348 Aug. 30, 19359 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano6 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal, which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel.' Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Construction of navigation channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot long transition channel with 24 o 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 315, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Oct. 7, 1980 H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 38-20 7. 8. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193510 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Channels of 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. Entrance channel 500 feet wide to and including a turning basin 3,350 feet long and generally 960 feet wide, all at a depth of 30 feet at mean lower low water.' PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike with groins, on westerly side, to stabilize entrance." Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin.12 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway.13 Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WA City Waterway. Hylebos Waterway H. Doc 244, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Commmittee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 699, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.5 Annual Report for 1893, page 342510 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.5 S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. and H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.5 H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 76, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 38-21 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 4, 191314 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19359 Aug. 30, 193515 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 July 24, 1946 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 July 24, 1946 as amended June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Dec. 15, 1970 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 17. Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previously authorized by Public Works Administration Sep. 6, 1933) Blair Waterway extension. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extensioh. WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY, WA Canal 15 feet deep, 75 feet wide on the bottom, and about 4,800 feet long; construct jetties to protect channel at southern or Oak Bay end, and a bulkhead for retention of dredging material. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. DUNGENESS RIVER, SEQUIM, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam MIDDLE FORK NOOKSACK RIVER, DEMING, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. PLACER CREEK, ID Construction of 3,700-foot concrete channel to confine Placer Creek flows through Wallace, Idaho. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. 38-22 See Section in Text Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 55, 72nd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 171, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.5 S. Doc. 101, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 625, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.5 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 21, 1985 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.5 P.L. 85-592 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 7, 1986 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 357, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess.5 P.L. 75-761 Documents 18. 20. 21. 24. 25. 26. 28. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 29. 30. 38-23 TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.5 P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.5 P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-23915 P.L. 90-48317 P.L. 91-28218 P.L. 91-625 31. 32. 33. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering longterm economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land not to exceed $2,000,000 for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation, not to exceed $1,500,000, to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands, in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. P.L. 91-611 S. Doc. 93-29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 1 Contains latest published map of Squalicum Creek Waterway. 2Contains latest published map of small-boat basin. 3Contains latest published map of Whatcom Creek Waterway. 4Deferred. 5Contains latest published map. "Inactive. 'A portion deferred. 8Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 9Included in Public Works Administration Program. '�Annual Report for 1913 contains latest published map (page 3127). 11A portion inactive. 12Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. '3Includes settling basin of 100,000 cubic yards capacity which has been classified as inactive. 14Annual Report of 1915 contains latest published map (page 3441). 15Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. 16 Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. "Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 18River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 38-24 See Section in Text Documents SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA' Completed 1977 825,2634 Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)' Completed 1966 125,634 Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, WA' Completed 1981 1,744,0255 - Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 - Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,3906 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Completed 1985 1,619,956 - Olympia, WA' Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, WA' Completed 1985 1,461,590 - Friday Harbor Marina, WA1 Completed 1985 1,618,5378 - Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 51,294 5,316 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,570' 5,00010 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Lake Crockett, WA Completed 1983 377,99011 512,940 Mats Mats Bay, WA 1 Completed 1970 137,67912 - Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,05813 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,880 7,634 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA2 Completed 1960 470,873 - Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,91114 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA3 Completed 1928 42,804 - Port Townsend, WA Completed 1974 480,89915 26,787 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,09116 Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 102,33017 36,258 Stillaguamish River, WA Inactive 1946 4,23418 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA 1 Completed 1981 2,000,00019 1Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 'No maintenance required. 4Includes $87,963 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 5Includes $132,349 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended and excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. Includes $40,790 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. 'Includes $8,005 expended for previous project. Excludes $50,000 expended by State of Washington in fulfilling terms of local cooperation. 'Includes $330,517 appropriated and expended for preauthorization cost and excludes $2,186,612 contributed funds expended. *Includes $43,037 for previous project and $235,341 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended. Excludes $1,267,881 contributed funds expended. 'Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 10Mitigation shore damages study expended. 11Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 12Excludes $28,288 contributed funds expended. 1 Includes $34,352 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. 14Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. "Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 1"Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 17Includes $2,500 expended for previous project. "sFor economic study only. 18Includes $178,371 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended, and excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. 38-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT2 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT 2 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Clark Fork River, Superior, MT 2 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID 2 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Entiat River, WA Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Methow River, WA Okanogan River, WA Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Tumwater, WA2 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA' Dungeness River, Sequim, WA 2 Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Flathead River, MT2 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Status Report For Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1957 1971 1964 1981 1981 1949 1966 1965 1977 1977 1981 1978 1983 1978 1971 1950 1968 1950 1941 1950 1958 1959 1958 1958 1980 1965 1967 1950 1950 1964 1981 1961 1951 1978 1972 1955 1948 59,5825 1,424 17,836 156,000 57,000 32,264 35,454 47,916 140,080 48,698 43,500 18,660 385,0106 31,548 28,356 27,947 50,0007 49,165 152,872 25,452 42,726 1,1008 30,0009 26,292 22,956 2,155 2,895 52,04010 99,000 14,09311 17,303 38,000 20,940 26,265 33,347 38-26 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Hoh River, County Road 16, WA 2 Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA 2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Hoquiam River, WA2 Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID 2 La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Methow River, Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Naches River, Naches, WA2 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA 2 Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 North Fork Skykomish River, WA2 Deferred 1981 300,0008 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1964 1962 1972 1976 1977 1980 1980 1956 1961 1964 1983 1977 1977 1977 1950 1965 1979 1974 1974 1974 1976 1949 1951 1951 1972 1977 1982 1972 1948 1960 1952 1985 1950 1960 1981 13,438 50,000 24,605 27,001 37,359 143,000 194,000 22,08212 11,916 41,622 173,00013 21,083 59,812 52,600 42,325 14,885 40,525 15,700 11,200 13,450 19,810 31,783 33,200 11,726 11,836 17,608 59,000 24,792 37,636 26,790 19,445 77,300 6,075 10,807 222,500 38-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) Project Okanogan River, WA2 Okanogan River, Omak, WA' Okanogan River, Oroville, WA Pilchuck River, WA Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Rock Creek Road, MT2 Rye Creek, MT 2 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Sammamish River, WA Sauk River, WA 2 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, MT 2 Shelton Creek, WA' Skagit Creek, WA (Avon Bypass) Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA 2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Snohomish River, Lowell- Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Spokane, Spokane River, WA Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA' Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed CONTROL PROJECTS 38-28 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1974 1981 1982 1985 1971 1980 1971 1964 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 1973 1942 1967 1974 1965 1979 1968 1982 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1939 1970 Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Operation and Construction Maintenance 10,100 2,231,03014 1,787,630's 81,000 10,713 54,000 30,973 11,291 86,160 125,000 39,300 208,000 15,92816 49,657 31,565 50,000 22,819 357,698 2,582,53617 20,860 50,00018 872,02119 54,4687 1,934,79220 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,00021 44,227 60,90022 15,565 16,43623 11,433 2,9448 271,713 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Completed 1964 50,00024 - Stillwater River, MT2 Completed 1973 17,457 - Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Completed 1977 34,513 - Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Completed 1970 8,442 - Tahola, WA2 Completed 1979 223,893 - Upper Puyallup River, WA3 Completed 1938 71,49525 - Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, WA4 Active 1977 544,331 - West Fork Foster Creek, WA2 Completed 1958 19,513 - Willapa River at Raymond, WA Deferred 1982 508,13026 - Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Completed 1976 111,072 - Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Completed 1969 50,00027 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Completed 1972 50,000 - Yakima, Yakima River, WA Completed 1948 381,961 - Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1949 8,047 - Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1947 48,272 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Completed 1977 36,768 - Yakima River, Yakima, WA2 Completed 1983 125,500 - 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 4Authorized by Secretary of Army under authority of Section 201, Public Law 298, 89th Congress, H. Doc. 91-370. 5Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. I6ncludes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $13,500 contributed funds expended. 7Excludes $24,728 contributed funds expended. 8Preconstruction planning only. 9Excludes $14,300 for restudy. 10Excludes Public Works Acceleration Act funds of $340,066. "Excludes $3,314 contributed funds expended. '2Excludes $21,807 contributed funds expended. '3Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 14Includes $125,000 preauthorization cost. Includes $1,030 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. "Includes $160,700 preauthorization cost. Includes $8,130 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. 1"Excludes $4,843 contributed funds expended. 17Excludes $696,923 contributed funds expended. Includes $117,420 preconstruction planning cost. "1Excludes $5,340 contributed funds expended. 19Includes $100,221 preauthorization cost. 20Includes $1,806,792 preauthorization planning cost. 2'Excludes $24,488 contributed funds expended. 22Excludes $14,307 contributed funds expended. 23Excludes $1,960 contributed funds expended. 24Excludes $46,182 contributed funds expended. "Emergency Relief Funds, Works Progress Administration. Excludes $13,704 contributed funds expended. 26Includes $32,630 preconstruction planning cost. 27Excludes $21,311 contributed funds expended. 38-29 TABLE 38-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Construction Operation and Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 1For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Utility District. Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report Deauthorized Expended Expended Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA 1958 1964 $9,1001 St. Regis River, MT 1958 1978 4,4002 Wenatchee River, WA 1958 1978 2,0003 Hammersley Inlet, WA 1950 1978 -- (Uncompleted Portion) Port Angeles Harbor, WA 1960 1977 (Uncompleted Portion) Port Gamble Harbor, WA 1953 1977 (Uncompleted Portion) Skagit River, WA 1950 1978 (Uncompleted Portion) 1Includes $100 for preauthorization studies and $9,000 for preconstruction planning. 2Includes $3,000 for preauthorization studies and $1,400 for preconstruction planning. 3Preauthorization studies only. 38-30 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (See Section 8) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1Y4 1/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill1 Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1Low water in upper pool. 3Cost of double lock and dam was $2,224,712 and the 2Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. emergency gates, completed in 1923, $174,693. TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 11) Name of Project Washington: Anacortes Harbor Bellingham Harbor Blaine Harbor Kenmore Navigation Channel Lake Crockett Mats Mats Bay Port Gamble Port Townsend Tacoma Harbor Waterway Connecting Port Towsend and Oak Bay Date Survey Conducted March 1986 April-May 1986 May 1986 July 1986 April 1986 June 1986 July 1986 May 1986 January 1986 June 1986 38-31 TABLE 38-4 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1986) Bowman Hilton Mobile Home Park, WA $ -134 Clear & Clarks Creeks, Pierce County, WA 15,000 Cottonwood Creek, Deer Lodge, MT1 35 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA 70,712 Flood Warning System, Snohomish Valley, WA2 7,500 Satus Creek, Yakima Indian Reservation, WA2 7,500 Sauk River, Darrington, WA2 7,500 Toppenish/Simcoe Creek, Yakima Indian Nation, WA 7,500 TOTAL $ 115,613 1Study terminated. 2Unfavorable appraisal TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs (1986) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation $ 272,346 7,129 154,318 TOTAL $ 433,793 38-32 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ............... 3. Catherine Creek OR ................... 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR ............... 5. Colfax, Palouse River, WA .............. 6 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 7. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... 8. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works .... 9. Lucky Peak Lake, ID .................. 10. Mill Creek Lake, WA ................. 11. Owyhee River, OR ..................... 12. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ........ 14. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam- Lake Sacajawea, WA ................... 15. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA ........................... 16. Little Goose Lock and Dam- Lake Bryan, WA ...................... 17. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA ....... 18. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam-Lake Herbert G. West, WA ........ 19. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, ID......... Page 20. McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula, 39-2 OR and WA .......................... 21. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ........... 39-2 39-2 39-2 39-2 39-2 39-2 39-3 39-3 39-3 39-3 39-4 39-4 39-4 39-5 39-5 39-5 39-6 39-6 General Investigations 22. Surveys .............................. 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 24. Continuation of Planning and Engineering 25. Advance Engineering and Design ........ Page 39-7 39-7 39-8 39-8 39-8 39-8 Tables Table 39-A Cost & Financial Statement.... 39-9 Table 39-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 39-11 Table 39-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 39-14 Table 39-D Not Applicable .............. Table 39-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 39-14 Table 39-F Not Applicable.............. Table 39-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 39-16 Table 39-H Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ......... 39-16 Table 39-I Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............. 39-17 Table 39-J Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment .. 39-18 Table 39-K Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ...................... 39-22 39-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $364 for Port of Clarkston, WA reconnaissance report and $134,715 for Clearwater River, Lewiston, ID draft detail project report. Flood Control 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization should be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during the fiscal year. 3. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Location. Catherine Creek is a tributary to the Grande Ronde River located 8 miles east of the City of La Grande, Union County, OR. Existing project. Organic debris such as fallen trees, brush, and a select number of large cottonwood trees were removed from the creek to increase its capacity to convey future floods. The work was funded under authority of Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954. Local cooperation. The Catherine Creek Corridor Improvement District sponsored the project and complied with requirements as set forth in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 plus additional requirements set forth in the project document. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Removal of debris was completed in FY 1986. 4. CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Location. At the City of Huntington waste water lagoon, Malheur County, Oregon. Existing project. Place 800 feet of rip rap along three cells of the lagoon system under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 flood control act. Local Cooperation. City of Huntington sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New work: work was completed in FY 1986. 5. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Location. On the main stem North and South Forks of the Palouse River and includes a portion of Spring Flat Creek, a tributary stream, all within the city of Colfax, WA. Existing project. Project consists of 3740 feet of concrete lined channel, 4910 feet of revetted channel, and 2330 feet of unrevetted channel and drainage structures. Authorizing legislation was provided under PL 78-534, Section 10, Flood Control Act of 1944. Local cooperation. The city of Colfax has provided the necessary right of way and other sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A study was completed on the adequateness of the channel dewatering pump, and indicated excessive surface water from behind the retaining wall was entering the pumping system. Subsequently, the surface water has been diverted away from the pump and its capacity now appears to be adequate. 6. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $66,741 for preauthorization studies: $28,604, Oakley Westside Channel, ID; $32,138, Salmon River, Vicinity of Salmon, ID; $6,000, Squaw Creek, Bancroft, ID. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $95,692 for disaster preparedness, $3,700 for emergency operations, $394,666 for rehabilitation. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Fiscal year costs were $23,086 for preauthorization studies: $4,000, Big Wood River, Blane County, ID; $19,086 Pocatello Creek, Bannock County, ID. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Congress). Fiscal year costs were $15,500 for preauthorization studies: $7,500 Big Lost River, Butte County, ID; $3,000, Henry's Fork River, Freemont County, ID; $5,000, South Fork Teton River, Madison County, ID. 7. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and 39-2 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. A contract to investigate the geological and seismological conditions at Ririe Dam, ID continued through the fiscal year. See Table 39-I for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $307,426. Total costs to September 30, 1986 have been $1,759,366. 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Inspections are pursuant to Public Law 84-99 which directs the Corps to establish through inspection whether non-federal flood control works will continue to provide the intended degree of flood protection and to determine if the maintenance program is adequate. FY 1986 costs for this program were $59,822. 9. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. (For further details see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. A feasible method of achieving better flood control through diversion into New York Canal, through Lake Lowell, and into the Snake River has been developed but rejected by local interests due to the infrequent use of this diversion method. Since 1961, $118,443,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. Final Environmental Impact Statement on the initial project was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 29, 1976. A revised draft Environmental Impact Statement for the modification work was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on September 18, 1978. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976 but to date it has not been funded. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. No further action has been taken. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of a power plant and new auxiliary outlet tunnel began in May 1984. The new auxiliary outlet tunnel modification to the existing outlet tunnel and new power plant were awarded in Fiscal Year 1986. Power on the line is scheduled for May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Installation of the steel liner on the flip lip section immediately downstream from the outlet control valve was completed in July of 1986. A contract to repair the discharge gate guides was initiated in FY 86. 10. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. Off-stream earthfill storage dam about 145 feet high and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Federal cost of original project was $2,162,155. Adding recreation facilities has thus far increased project costs by $96,340 to $2,258,495. Not included in that cost is $80,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of the channel through Walla Walla. (For further details see page 2005 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of channel through city of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Park and recreation facilities were opened to the public July 1, 1964. Since 1942, $5,424,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on December 12, 1975. The rehabilitation of the existing project is designed to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir requiring limited flood control use of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: continued on Phase I & II of the channel rehabilitation, which is the segment of channel from 9th Street to Gose Street and the Diversion Dam to Tausick Way. A contract for Phase III of the channel rehabilitation which extends from Tausick Way to Roosevelt street bridge was also awarded in FY 1986. Maintenance: Routine maintenance by Government forces continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 11. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Location. The lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River from the junction with the Snake River, upstream 23 miles to the Owyhee River diversion dam, Malheur County, OR. Existing project. Remove organic debris and gravels from the lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. The Owyhee River Water Control District sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Work was completed in FY 1986. 39-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 12. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR public opposition. Units 4, 5, and 6 are now classified OPERATIONS "inactive". Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulations of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $252,987. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. A straight concrete gravity dam about 717 feet in maximum structural height above foundation and 3,300 feet long at crest Elevation 1613. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acrefeet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control, and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into a Iagged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The project also provides substantial recreation benefits. Powerhouse includes two 90,000 and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units, with provisions for three additional 220,000 kilowatt units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Fish passage at Dworshak Dam is not feasible due to the height of the dam and a hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. The reservoir area has been habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Project plans include acquisition of land outside reservoir limits to mitigate losses of big game winter browse areas inundated by reservoir. Construction of the project started April 1963 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June of 1972 it has prevented about $737,000 of potential flood damage. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 220,000-kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to Power generating Unit No. 1, 90,000-kilowatt capacity, was put in service March 1, 1973; Unit No. 2, also 90,000-kilowatt capacity, began producing April 6, 1973; Unit No. 3, 220,000-kilowatt capacity, went on the line April 20, 1973. Power generation through September 1986 has been 24.37 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping at each site. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife habitat browse development continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Contracts for the Energy Recovery Contract at the Dworshak Hatchery, Three Meadows Group Camp, Freeman Creek Road slide repair, electrical service to Three Meadows Group Camp were completed. Contracts for paving of the parking lot at the hatchery and Merry Bay road repair were also completed. Maintenance: Normal operations and maintenance continued. Hatchery operations continue to be impaired by IHN virus. Steelhead eggs have been transfered to Kooskia National Fish Hatchery for incubation and early rearing of fry to a point past their normal period of susceptability. In spring of 1986, 2,900,000 steelhead smolts weighing approximately 400,000 pounds were released. A return of 8,000 to 10,000 adults is expected in 1986. In addition to steelhead, the hatchery also released 800,000 spring chinook smolts (40,000 pounds) and 160,000 rainbow trout (10,000 pounds). Rainbow trout production is also hindered by the IHN virus and fish were acquired from Hagerman Hatchery. 14. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 437 mean sea level, and extends upstream about 31.9 miles, providing slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Beginning at south end, project consists of a concrete nonoverflow section, concrete powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and an earth and rockfill embankment at north abutment. Fish passing facilities, including two 39-4 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 90,000-kilowatt units and three 111,000-kilowatt units in operation. Spillway dam is 610 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 391 mean sea level is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide by 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 mean sea level and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started December 1955 and the project was placed in useful operation January 1962. The project is complete. An Environmental Impact Statement concerning power units 4 through 6 was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality August 1971. Power generation through September 1986 has been 56.02 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Work was completed for the painting of spillway gates and gate seal heaters, fish viewing window cleaner, installation of guide wall anchor cables and piling installation. 2.66 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 2,708,866 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1985. 15. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. Existing project. The project consists of a new fixed high-level four lane highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000". In December 1981 Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2,200,000 for construction of Lewiston's North Ramp. An approach roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, WA was authorized in July 1983 at an additional expenditure of $800,000. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 16, 1979. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for land and relocation are $755,193. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Completion of as built drawings. 16. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Lower Monumental Lake, about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Improvements provide navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 mean sea level. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed and consists of a powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and necessary nonoverflow sections. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt generating units for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam can pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Relocations along the lake include 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 5.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on January 8, 1975. Power generation through September 1986 has been 43.24 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. A total of 3.37 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Work continued on reconditioning of spillway gates and fish viewing window washers were installed. Work is continuing on the design memorandum for a permanent juvenile fish facility. A total of 2,224,584 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1985. 17. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities, and requires about 8 miles of backwater levees along Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Benefits afforded by project include slack-water navigation, power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Water surface at the dam varies between Elevations 738 and 724 to maintain a normal operating range 39-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 between Elevations 738 and 733 in the Lewiston, IDClarkston, WA area. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt units. Spillway has a capacity for a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is a single-lift type (105 feet maximum) with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started July 1965 and is complete. Acquisition of lands is also complete. Lake was filled February 15, 1975 and the first power generating unit went on the line April 15, 1975. Approximately $4,119,300 in potential flood damage has been prevented since the levees became functional. An Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality November 1971. A revised statement to include the additional units was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 23, 1975. Power generation through September 1986 has been 34.16 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts completed were fish viewing window cleaner, Lewiston Levee improvements, paving parking lot at Chief Timothy Park, modifications to Hell;s Gate Park, miscellaneous piling installation and Dredging at the Confluence of Snake & Clearwater Rivers. As the first juvenile fish collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite is a primary component in the District's fish collection and transport program. This program was begun because construction of eight dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers has had a significant impact on the survival during downstream migration of juvenile anadromous fish such as salmon and steelhead trout. Since the early 1960's, efforts to mitigate the adverse impacts have included extensive research, structural modifications of the dams, installation of turbine screening systems, and implementation of a system for collecting and transporting juvenile fish. The Walla Walla District operates the fish collection and transportation program for the Columbia-Snake system. Three primary collection points have been established at Lower Granite, Little Goose and McNary dams, with fish sorting and handling facilities. Fingerlings collected at these facilities are taken by specially designed barges and trucks to an area downstream of Bonneville Dam and released to make the rest of their journey to the sea. In 1986 a total of 13,563,000 juvenile fish were transported and 14,787,592 fingerlings were transported. Increased hatchery production has resulted in increased numbers of fish to be transported. A total of 3.38 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 1,557,299 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1985. 18. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAMLAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea, about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, fish ladders, navigation lock, appurtenant facilities, and relocated railroads and highways. The project functions include navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation and irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537. The lake extends about 28.7 miles upstream to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam is concrete gravity type with earthfill and rockfill abutments. It is 3,800 feet long including abutments, spillway, navigation lock, and powerhouse, and is about 135 feet high above streambed. There are two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000-kilowatt units for a total capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway is 508 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 483 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 8 radial gates, each 50 feet wide and 61 feet high. Deck is at Elevation 553 feet and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type, with lock chamber 86 by 675 feet and minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction began June 1961, and the project was opened to navigation April 1969. The project is complete. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on May 21, 1976. Power generation through September 1986 has been 47.00 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts completed were: Installation of guide wall anchor cables, repair of heat pump, generator thrust bearing repair, fish viewing window cleaner, miscellaneous piling installation and vertical barrier screen guide installation. A total of 2.77 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy was delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Cargoes totaling 2,350,789 tons passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1985. 19. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The project will consist of a series of fish hatcheries and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). In 1980 the first release from the McCall, ID summer chinook hatchery was made, and the adult trapping facility 39-6 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT which provides the fish egg supply for the McCall Hatchery became operational. The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Dworshak Hatchery Expansion, Irrigon Hatchery, Magic Valley Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery, East Fork Salmon River Satellite Facility, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, the Irrigon and Wallow Sattelite Hatcheries, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery are in operation. The compensation plan is 67 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $177,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts were awarded for: Magic Valley Hatchery and Spring Water Collection system, Big Canyon Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery completions, Lyons Ferry Hatchery completions, Tucannon Hatchery completion, Red River Sattelite Hatchery, Dayton Hatchery Ponds and Irrigon landscaping. The final hatchery site has been selected at Ahsahka, Idaho, for the Clearwater River basin. This hatchery will rear both spring chinook and steelhead. Red River-Crooked River & Powell hatcheries have been identified as satellite sites for the Clearwater Hatchery. 20. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. Includes a concrete dam 7,300 feet long overall and 183 feet high above streambed, powerplant with 14 power generating units, navigation lock, fishways, levees and pumping plants, incidental irrigation, and modification and relocation of railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and is complete. Project placed on permanent operating basis and lake raised to Elevation 340 in November 1953. Except for maintenance interruptions, all 14 power units have been in commercial operation since February 1957. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1976. Power generation through September 1986 has been 197.39 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. The modernization program is basically completed. Contracts initiated were roof repairs for the powerhouse, repair to excitation equipment, stator replacement for unit 14 and purchase of fish pump transformer. Contracts completed were fish viewing window cleaners, realignment of beach entrance road, painting of intake crane, paving of public use areas, and dredging below Ice Harbor Dam. Approximately 6.96 billion kilowatt hours of electric energy were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. A total of 5,338,751 tons of commodities passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1985. 21. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230. Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slackwater navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for that portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam-Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Tables 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite locks and dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance 39-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. General Investigations 22. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal ongoing survey. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. The potential for supplemental water storage, power generation, and streamflow augmentation to enhance fisheries, continues to be the primary focus. A survey study of the Mill Creek Basin continued in FY 1986. Mill Creek originates in the Blue Mountains in northern Oregon and southern Washington, and is tributary to the Walla Walla River. Water resource problems and needs being investigated include municipal and industrial water supply, power generation, fish enhancement, flood control, and irrigation. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. A major activity of the CR&T study in FY 1986 was the Regional Hydropower Assessment being performed in coordination with the Northwest Power Planning Council. Other work on the CR&T study involved preparation of basin summary reports, development of flood control operational information, and continued work on the John Day and Clearwater River Basin interim study. A survey study is underway that is investigating the flooding problems associated with the rising water levels of Malheur Lake in Harney County, Oregon. Five consecutive years of above normal runoff from the basin have raised the level of this closed basin lake above any historical record and caused great economic and social impacts on Harney County. Alternatives being investigated include a canal from Malheur Lake that would discharge lake water into the South Fork of the Malheur River, relocations of transportation facilities and land exchange and/or buy out of private lands. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $1,349,627. That sum was expended for: flood control studies, $1,201,692; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, Cooperation with States, $35,285; and Special Investigations and FERC Licensing Activities, $112,650. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $112,940 which was expended for flood plain management services, $59,398; and technical services, $53,542. 24. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse), OR and WA McNary Second Powerhouse is a proposed addition on the south shore of McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River near Umatilla, OR. The project will increase the present 1127 megawatt generating capacity by an additional 742 megawatts. Provisions are included for compensation of negative impacts on fish and wildlife. The project is estimated to cost $660,000,000 at October 1, 1985 price levels. The General Design Memorandum Phase I was prepared under the Water Resource Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, and submitted to the Secretary of the Army on July 1, 1981. Studies were initiated in FY 1982 and continued through FY 1984 on the General Design Memorandum Phase II and the Powerhouse Preliminary Design Report. 1986 expenditures were $19,506 spent on hydraulic model study by Waterway Experiment Station in Vicksburg, MS. 25. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Zintel Canyon Dam, WA The proposed project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 102 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed maximum release outlet works that would create a detention reservoir of 2,500 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 2,100 acre-feet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a channel with a capacity of 400 cfs. The plan of improvement would provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Estimated Federal project cost is $4,800,000. Reevaluation of the project was initiated to review economic feasibility with fiscal year costs of $385. 39-8 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 3. Catherine Creek, OR New Work 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR 5. Colfax, Palouse River, ID 9. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 10. Mill Creek Lake, WA 11. Owyhee River, OR 13. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID 14. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA 15. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID & WA 16. Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA 17. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA 18. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 185,000 - 107,968 - 71,400 698,800 839,000 740,442 654,651 299,044 298,254 1,596,734 1,594,699 27,894 27,894 317,200 302,422 1,775,000 1,710,362 38,000 15,603 68,000 131,581 12,932 88,500 63,974 38,000 28,535 88,500 63,974 - 5,810,240 11,215 5,808,004 71,400 - 19,652-0811 - - 19,652,0811 1,211,650 1,101,999 10,205,853 1,358,698 1,136,570 10,197,214 302,500 309,107 2,281,043 2,346,813 7,500 7,500 1,630,000 1,634,122 3,750,922 4,515,463 -2,299 -3,290 4,800,141 4,869,452 3,081,100 3,052,306 4,527,800 4,478,567 200,106 200,106 4,004,900 3,969,635 692,664 640,000 693,216 486,402 - 2,258,4952 - 2,258,4952 616,000 6,517,893 613,230 6,503,285 2,517,000 17,795,607 2,517,177 17,794,485 68,000 35,014 3,983,000 3,487,491 5,481,000 5,369,881 49,004 50,004 4,168,629 3,875,053 80,000 227,516 - 1,000,500 55,995 11 1,000,036 4,904,122 5,436,056 4,338,143 4,868,523 5,292,141 3,998,368 2,052,181 2,047,995 5,896,535 5,776,641 -906 394,800 396,804 5,249,400 5,263,880 -2,600 -1,706 50,000 559,901 5,446,000 5,499,554 75,500 42,514 329,523,2963 329,507,9583 48,587,7874 48,442,0054 - 167,240,7575 - 167,240,7575 4,868,671 50,242,7746 5,183,795 50,205,2706 - 22,957,664 6,210 22,957,664 56,460 3,921,401 4,442,150 221,355,0227 221,355 022' 39,430,7958 39,331,1688 74,689 - 367,780,3159 84,600 - 367,780,3128 5,706,000 8,890,205 45,084,50210 5,594,704 9,053,763 44,939,03810 18,121 18,141 - 236,373,73211 - 236,373,73211 39-9 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 Maint. Approp. 3,677,483 4,300,500 3,220,629 4,037,830 34,785,23212 Cost 3,691,797 3,390,678 3,819,029 4,322,908 34,717,30412 19. Lower Snake Fish & New Work Wildlife Compensa- Approp. 19,656,180 25,225,000 13,235,129 14,971,000 119,136,909 tion, ID, OR & WA Cost 19,706,580 25,024,768 12,989,270 15,096,848 118,806,292 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. - - 223,965 - 223,965 Cost - - 223,965 - 223,965 20. McNary Lock & New Work Dam-Lake Wallula, Approp. 439,000 202,600 19,019 - 322,515,105 '3 OR & WA Cost 479,320 203,380 19,242 - 322,515,105 '3 Maint. Approp. 10,317,455 14,767,500 13,147,025 9,977,999 127,341,03514 Cost 11,024,478 12,505,395 13,859,268 11,305,733 127,071,07614 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. - - 43,707 - 43,707 Cost - - - 43,707 43,707 21. Snake River Down- New Work stream from John- Approp. 2,049,882 1,592,806 197,809 - 993,184,58915 son Bar Landing, Cost 2,043,810 1,595,240 209,206 - 993,184,58715 OR, WA & ID Maint. Approp. 19,311,281 18,990,856 17,455,401 21,725,107 170,112,82616 Cost 19,254,422 17,916,334 17,305,877 23,008,630 169,757,65716 'Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 3Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 4Includes $14,337,680 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to the project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $59,996 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Includes $75,400 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 6Includes $71,507 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 'Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. 8Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 9Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 'oIncludes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. "Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. "Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. '3Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. '4Includes $125,258 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $1,035,860 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 1"Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $82,500 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. i"Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $375,953 appropriated and $372,293 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 39-10 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 24, 1954 as amended July 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 2. May 17, 1950 39-11 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening, and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at City of Huntington waste water lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete lined channel. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 3, 1985 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 10, 1986 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L. 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. 4. 5. WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 24, 1954 as amended July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 15, 1963 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 29, 1981 July 30, 1983 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 10. 12. 39-12 OWYHEE RIVER, OR Gravel, brush and small tree removal from lower 12 miles of Owyhee River (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project, Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four lane highway bridge and approaches. Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAMLAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAMLAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA AND ID Open-river navigation. Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 11, 1985. S. Doc. 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 88-96 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 97-140 P.L. 98-63 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 91-638 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 95-285 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. 39-13 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries Completed 1968 1,851,195 above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA1 'Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary projects TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID' Completed 1951 12,019 - Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Completed 1970 133,518 - Big Wood River, ID5 Completed 1985 170,000 - Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1958 42,796 - Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Deferred 1980 267,626 - Blackfoot River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1965 391,143 Boise Valley, Ada County Unit, Columbia River Basin, ID Deferred 1967 46,084 - Boise, River, ID5 Completed 1985 236,500 - Catherine Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1978 1,552,000 - Connell, WA1 Completed 1967 60,000 - Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac ID2 Completed 1984 23,400 - Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 - Dry Creek, WA' Completed 1961 384,426 - Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA Completed 1967 232,792 - Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA1 Completed 1969 2,665 - Gooding Area, ID' Completed 1954 59,167 - Grande Ronde Lake, OR Deferred 1966 - - Grande Ronde Valley, Columbia River Basin, OR Deferred 1958 102,458 - Graves Creek, ID' Completed 1953 75,469 - Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,575,838 Heise-Roberts Extension, Columbia River Basin, ID 1968 (a)Henrys Fork Unit Deferred 27,800 - (b) Snake River Unit Completed 3,375,158 - Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,388,270 - Kendrick, Potlatch River, Columbia River Basin, ID Completed 1960 59,942 - Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID1 Completed 1972 176,833 - Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID1 Completed 1973 113,296 - Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA1 Completed 1972 17,592 - Lower Walla Walla River, Columbia River Basin, WA Inactive 1953 4,000 - Lyman Creek, ID1 Completed 1971 230,315 - Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Completed 1957 55,894 Malheur River, Vale Unit, Columbia River Basin, Or Completed 1961 325,581 - Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 1,786,753 - 39-14 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1985 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID1 Mud Lake, Columbia River Basin, ID Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Rapid Creek, ID 5 Palouse River, Columbia River Basin WA Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID 2 Portneuf River & Marsh Creek Pocatello Unit, Columbia River Basin, ID Pullman, Palouse, WA Riverside Area, Pasco, WA 1 Ririe Lake, ID Sewage Lagoons, Vale, OR 2 Shelley Area, Snake River, Columbia River Basin, ID Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR1 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID 1 South Firk, Boise River, ID 5 South Fork Clearwater River, Coluumbia River Basin, ID South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID' Teton River, Columbia River Basin, ID Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA1 Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Umatilla River, OR1 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge OR2 Weiser River, Columbia River Basin, ID Weiser River, ID 5 Whitebird Creek, Columbia River Basin, ID Willow Creek, ID 1 Willow Creek Lake, OR Yakima River, West Richland, WA' 4 Completed 1965 54,538 Inactive Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed 1957 1949 1985 1977 1967 1969 1964 1972 1983 1985 1958 1970 1980 1952 1968 1985 1973 1973 1955 1955 1973 1971 1961 1960 1960 1985 1956 1963 1985 1964 5,996 23,050 19,500 110,815 39,172 6,456,032 99,540 28,839 39,677,448 75,000 32,335 5,000 131,700 8,501 32,425 44,400 3,899 61,055 10,387 128,635 72,140 73,932 161,540 16,118 37,757 106,900 1,896 976 37,168,114 238,890 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 80-858. 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526 3Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 4Includes $9,000 contributed funds. 5Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 83-780 39-15 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Asotin Dam, Snake R. ID & WA 1964 1975 - - Boise Valley, Canyon County Unit, ID - 1967 10,600 - Camas Creek, ID - 1965 9,080 - Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID - 1984 183,100 - Little Wood River, ID - 1965 21,334 - Malheur River, Willow Creek Unit, OR - 1969 13,000 - Mill Creek, WA - 1977 3,537 - Payette Valley, ID - 1978 23,178 - Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID - 1969 - - Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 - Touchet River, WA - 1977 11,198 - Weiser River, Cambridge- Midvale, ID - - 75,000 - TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Status Cost Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 42,796 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit Deferred 1,060,000 46,084 Canyon County Unit Deauthorized - 10,600 Camas Creek, ID Deauthorized - 9,080 Grande Ronde Valley, OR Deferred 8,639,000 102,458 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Deferred 165,000 27,800 Snake River Unit Completed - 3.375.158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 59,942 Little Wood River, ID Deauthorized - 21,334 Lower Walla Walla River, WA Inactive 372,000 4,000 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 325.581 Willow Creek Unit Deauthorized - 13,000 Mill Creek, WA Deauthorized - 3,537 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Palouse River, WA Deferred 914,000 - Payette Valley, ID Deauthorized - 23,178 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,0321 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,335 South Fork Clearwater River, ID Inactive - 3,899 Teton River, ID Inactive - 10,387 Touchet River, WA Deauthorized - 11,198 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deauthorized - 75,000 Whitebird Creek, ID Inactive - 1,896 Total 11,090,191 'Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. 39-16 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) Big Canyon Creek, Peck, ID April 1986 Big Lost River, Arco, ID August 1986 Big Wood River, ID July 1986 Boise River, South Fork, ID August 1986 Buffalo Fork, Ferry Location, WY August 1986 Catherine Creek, Union, OR April 1986 ClearWater River, Middle Fork, Kooskia, ID April 1986 Clearwater River, Kooskia & Stites, ID April 1986 Cottonwood River, Culdesac, ID April 1986 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA April 1986 Gros Ventre River, WY August 1986 Hoback River, WY August 1986 Lawyers Creek, Kamiah, ID April 1986 Malheur River, OR April 1986 Salmon River, ID July 1986 Snake River, Annex Location, OR April 1986 Snake River, ID August 1986 Snake River, ID August 1986 Weiser River, ID April 1986 Yakima River, West Richland, WA April 1986 39-17 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 394 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 13 of Text) Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 14 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 Cubic Feet Per Second 1613 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 55 Ft. 2 428 Feet 3 3 2 @ 90,000 kw; 4 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 Feet March 1973 1600-1445 Feet 1605 Feet 2,000,000 Ac.-Ft. 53 Miles 17,090 Acres 175 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 100 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 10 39-18 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 16 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 638 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 671 Feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw; 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 Feet December 1961 440-437 Feet 446 Feet 31.9 Miles 9,200 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 80 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 93 Feet 98 Feet 101 Feet 15 Feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 60 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 244 Feet March 1970 638-633 Feet 646.5 Feet 37.2 Miles 10,025 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 92 Miles 39-19 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 17 of Text) Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type: Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Contruction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 86 Feet 675 Feet 95 Feet 100 Feet 105 Feet 15 Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Thainter 50 Ft. by 60.5 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 Feet April 1975 738-733 Feet 746.5 Feet 38 Miles 8,900 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 91 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 98 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 61 Ft. 8 39-20 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 39-J4 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 20 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 Feet May 1969 540-537 Feet 548 Feet 28.7 Miles 6,590 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 78 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 67 Feet 75 Feet 83 Feet 15 Feet November 1983 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 Feet Vertical Life 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 22 1,348 Feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 Feet November 1953 340-335 Feet 356.5 Feet 64 Miles 38,800 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 242 Miles 39-21 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 21 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30, 1986 to Sep. 30, 1986 Com- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing Open River Pasco to Lewiston Totals Existing Project Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 221,355,022 321,503,981 63,800 46,212,534 367,780,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 236,373,732 34,613 129,578,480 129,578,490 50,242,774 50,205,270 914,256 36,748,021 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 221,355,022 914,256 36,748,021 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 221,355,022 50,242,774 39,430,795 39,430,795 50,205,270 39,331,168 39,331,168 321,503,981 321,503,979 45,084,502 44,939,038 63,800 46,212,534 367,780,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 236,373,732 63,800 46,212,534 367,780,313 184,712,361 51,661,371 236,373,732 45,084,502 34,785,232 34,785,232 44,939,038 34,717,304 34,717,304 100 FY 57 100 100 100 100 100 100 FY 57 FY 71 FY 63 FY 74 100 FY 65 100 100 100 100 100 100 FY 84 FY 74 FY 61 FY 75 34,6131 34,6131 378,603 373,9572 - - - 4,350 4,350 992,784,439 992,784,439 992,784,437 169,926,256 169,571,087 100 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 993,184,589 993,184,589 993,184,587 170,112,826 169,757,657 1New Work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2Includes $6,014 FY 1986 project condition survey cost. 39-22 ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ................. 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK .......... 3. Cordova Small Boat Harbor, AK.......... 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK ............... 5. Homer Harbor, AK .................... 6. Kake Harbor, AK ..................... 7. King Cove Harbor, AK ................. 8. Mekoryuk, AK ........................ 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ................ 10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK .................. 11. Nome Harbor, AK ..................... 12. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK ....... 13. Project Condition Surveys .............. Flood Control 14. Bethel, Mission Road, Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK ..................... 15. Chena River Lakes, AK ................ 16. Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK ..................... 17. Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK 18. Kuskokwim River, Bethel, AK ........... 19. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... Page 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 21. Snettisham, AK ...................... General Investigations 22. Surveys ............................. 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........................... 24. Continuation of Planning and Engineering Page 40-6 40-6 40-7 40-7 40-4 Tables 40-5 Table 40-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 40-8 40-5 Table 40-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 40-11 Table 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 40-13 Table 40-D Not Applicable.............. 40-5 Table 40-E Other Authorized Flood Control 40-5 Projects ..................... 40-14 Table 40-F Not Applicable.............. 40-5 Table 40-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 40-14 40-6 Table 40-H Navigation Work Under Special 40-6 Authorization ................ 40-15 Table 40-I Project Condition Surveys ...... 40-15 40-6 40-6 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The dredging was performed by U.S Hopper dredge Essayons with 800,000 cubic yards of silt removed during July and August 1986. Dredging has been accomplished across the entire project during FY 1986. Controlling depth at the harbor was -31 feet mean lower low water, with a majority of the 40-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 harbor at project depth of -36. Because of the lack of maneuverability by the dredge within the tight confines of Anchorage Harbor, deposuts of sediments at both ends of the dock could not be reached by the dredge. A separate cleanup contract was advertised in September 1986 and scheduled to be awarded in October 1986. 2. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Bethel is 65 miles upriver on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River, which flows through southwestern Alaska. Bethel is about 400 miles west of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 9302 and USGS Map Bethel D8.) Existing project. Project (Section 107) includes provision of a 12-acre small boat harbor and 1,270 foot entrance channel by deepening, widening, and straightening a portion of the Lousetown Slough which is 0.3 miles east of Bethel. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.0 feet and extreme tidal range is 10.0 feet, during low summer water flow in Kuskokwim River. Water level also depends on river state; tidal effects decrease with higher river flows, disappearing only at the 20-year-frequency flood stage. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bethel serves as a regional transportation center for approximately 50 villages. A medium-draft port facility was built along the city's riverfront in 1975. Goods, including gas, oil, food, clothing, and construction material are all brought into Bethel for redistribution to outlying villages. Generally, river shipments of bulk goods are transported by medium-draft barges. Personal supplies are often moved in individually owned riverboats which also are used for fishing activities. The riverboat fleet in Bethel is estimated to number between 1,000 and 1,100 boats, of which 400 are transient boats from other villages along the Kuskokwim River. There are also eight river barges varying in size to as large as 30 by 100 feet. The barges are powered by five locally-based tug boats with lengths ranging from 25 to 40 feet. No protected berthing areas exist at Bethel for any water craft. The riverboats are beached on the sandbars and banks for temporary storage. Brown's Slough is particularly popular as a berthing area, resulting in overcrowding and congestion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction was physically completed in FY 1983 and fiscally complete in FY 1986. 3. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Cordova is on Orca Inlet, a strait near the eastern entrance of Prince William Sound, about 150 air miles south-southeast of Anchorage. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 8520, 8525, and 8551.) Existing project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction of a harbor expansion from 8.26 acres to 20 acres by removal of the existing 1400-foot breakwater and construction of a new 2000-foot long breakwater. The entrance channel is dredged to -16 feet mean lower low water and the turning basin is dredged from -10 to -12 mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 12.4 feet with an extreme range of 21.7 feet. The dredged material is disposed of in two diked upper tidal areas which will be used as staging facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two municipal docks accommodate general cargo and passengers, including automobile ferry traffic. One privately owned wharf, reduced by fire, provides oil handling and bunkering facilities. Three privately owned wharves are used for industrial purposes. A small boat float system for public use is in original basin. State ferry dock in basin has been superseded by municipal dock and is inactive. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project is physically complete. Contractor claim is pending for attorneys' fees. 4. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project: A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sheet pile sill across the basin outlet with a top elevation of 7 feet above mean lower low water. During design stage the project was revised to include a rock sill with adjacent scour-protection blankets and the embankment was relocated to include a berm between the basin and the embankment. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned one owned by the city of Dillingham, and four publicly owned small-boat floats in the project basin. Two docks are used for salmon-cannery operations; the third is an oil handling and bunkering terminal; the fourth dock is used by the city to unload barges which come into Dillingham. New floats for the harbor were installed in June 1982 and removed before fall freezeup. They are replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are inadequate for number of boats using small boat harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Government plant and hired labor performed dredging from the end of May to the middle of June and from the middle of August to the first of September 1986. A total of 100,000 cubic yards of material were removed. A major breakdown in the middle of June caused the dredge to be shutdown until the middle of August 1986. An impeller for the dredge pump had to be manufactured and shipped to Dillingham. 40-2 ALASKA DISTRICT 5. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the most western segment of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the most eastern segment of the harbor; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small-boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging operations were initiated in February 1986 but were suspended when the U.S. dredge Warren George sank in the boat harbor. Hydrographic surveys were performed and operations will be resumed in October, 1986. 6. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake, on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, AK, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, WA. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 900-foot long south breakwater, enclosing a 7-acre berthing area. Poor foundation conditions found during preconstruction investigations have forced modification of the project to include a 1,760-foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750-foot-long south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. Estimated project cost is $12,537,000 (October 1985), including $12,500,000 Corps of Engineers funds $21,000 Coast Guard funds, and $16,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float equipped airplanes and shallow-draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deepdraft piers: one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including a float for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, there is one publicly-owned smallboat float. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in smallboat facilities: the complete lack of protection in the directions of the most severe storms; shallow water at Portage Cove float and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causes major boat damage and limits the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between city and present small-boat float at Portage Cove. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A biological study was completed which investigated the aquatic habitats and organisms of the project area through the use of a joint United States Fish and Wildlife Service - Corps of Engineers dive effort. The data gathered is being used to understand temporal changes in these natural systems, pre- and post-project conditions, as well as provide background information for a recolonization study of man-made rubble structures in Alaska. Analysis of the data was completed and the report was prepared in FY 1986. A temporary automatic meteorburst wind monitoring station was maintained to gather wind velocity and directional data more closely associated with the location of the project for comparison with data used in preparing the plans and specifications. 7. KING COVE HARBOR, AK Location. The city of King Cove, Alaska, is located near the southwesterly tip of the Alaska Peninsula in southwestern Alaska, 630 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16549.) Existing project. Provides for an 11-acre small-boat basin having an anchorage basin 900 feet long by 550 feet wide and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and about 400 feet long, both at a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water, a 1,400-foot long training dike, top elevation 10 feet above mean lower low water; and a 200-foot long rock sea groin, top elevation 14 feet above mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.8 feet, with an extreme range of 14.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consists of twin wharves with a small basin between them; marine rail and slipways flanked by catwalks and oil terminal facilities; and mooring buoys, dolphins, and piling for small boats. All are privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for present oceangoing commerce but inadequate for the commercial fishing vessels operating in the area. A study for a new dock to be built by the State has been completed and engineering specifications for the new dock are now in the process of being written. The new dock will be leased to the city after construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project is fiscally complete. 8. MEKORYUK, AK Location. Mekoryuk, is on the northeast shore of Nanivak Island in the Bering Sea approximately 23 miles 40-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 from mainland Alaska in the region of the Yukon- Kuskokwim Delta. Existing project: Construction of a rock breakwater is to provide both boat protection and beach erosion protection. The breakwater is constructed adjacent to the existing boat beaching area; this location would offer erosion protection against waves generated within Shoal Bay; side slopes are 1 on 2 and crest elevation is 17.5 feet above mean lower low water. The top width is six feet. Length is 510 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Contract was awarded in May 1986 and physically completed in September 1986. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small-boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general-cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small-boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project is physically complete; however, various contractor claims are still pending. Maintenance: In October 1984 erosion problems at the beach adjacent to the east breakwater of the Metlakatla Small Boat Harbor were first reported. A site investigation was made on October 30, 1984. Beach erosion in this area has accelerated since construction of the harbor. A letter report describing the erosion and two recommended alternatives was completed in January 1985, and forwarded to higher authority for review and funding. Funding was obtained and a contract for placing a 4-foot thick riprap blanket (approximately 3,300 cubic yards of quarry spalls) on the beach and placing riprap on the landward connection of the east breakwater was awarded on September 30, 1985. The work was completed in November 1985. 10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK, about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small-boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep-draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished with 8,200 cubic yards removed in 1986. A survey of the basin during May 1986 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. Due to storm action, littoral drift beach material shoaled the entrance channel three times necessitating removal by bulldozer. Approximately 1,800 cubic yards of material was removed during these operations. 11. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing water-front improvements on easterly beach by means of rock-mound seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels 40-4 ALASKA DISTRICT are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravelfilled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction is scheduled to be completed in the first quarter of FY 1987. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the ice-free season. 7,200 cubic yards were removed in FY 1986. Seriously damaged conditions of the entrance channel sheetpile wall necessitated immediate interim repairs. A Letter Report for interim repairs was prepared and approved. Construction was initiated in September 1986 with a scheduled completion date of November 1986. A new DM for Entrance Channel Permanent Repairs and Modifications will be initiated in FY 1987. 12. PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Port Lions is located on the north end of Kodiak Island, approximately 19 air miles west of the city of Kodiak. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16594.) Existing Project. The Office of the Chief of Engineers approved construction for a small boat harbor at Port Lions on April 9, 1979. Construction consisted of a 600-foot-long breakwater, a 170-foot-long stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 9.6 feet with an extreme range of 18 feet. A severe storm in November 1981 badly damaged the project. The repair work included replacing material of the existing main breakwater, extending the main breakwater 125 feet, changing the seaward breakwater slope to a 2.OH:1.OV adding a layer of armor rock and raising the design crest elevation from +18.5 mean lower low water to + 22.0 mean lower low water. Minor dredging in the entrance channel to -15.0 mean lower low water was also included. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A municipal timber pile dock at Port Wakefield serves as both a shallow-draft and deepdraft facility for Port Lions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project is complete. Contractor claim for differing site conditions for dredging is pending. 13. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels, and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $512,796 (See Table 40-I). 14. BETHEL, MISSION ROAD EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Mission road at Bethel, AK. Existing project: Construct protection stone layer in front of bulkead piling along Mission Road. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Contract was awarded in August 1986 and is scheduled for completion in October 1986. Flood Control 15. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22-mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana River to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $209,000,000, (excluding Little Chena Dam, presently deferred) and estimated non-Federal cost is $12,548,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Constructtion of the Tanana River Levee System Repair was completed in August 1986 and the new Office and Warehouse contract is under construction. A construction contract for the Tanana River Levee Protection Phase II, Groins 9 and 10 was awarded in August 1986 and a construction contract for 30 Relief Wells was awarded in September 1986. Maintenance: High water events occured in June, July and August 1986 necessitating lowering the flood gates. Although no direct flooding was caused by the highwater events, Salmon and Grayling Fry were killed in Ox-Bow Lakes within the floodway area. Corrective action will be reviewed in FY 1987. 16. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. City of Dillingham is located at the confluence of the Wood and Nushagak Rivers in the Bristol Bay area of southwestern Alaska. Existing project: Relocate water and sewer lines. Local cooperaiton. Will be required prior to construction. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Initial contact with local sponsor. 40-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 17. GALENA EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Galena is located on the north bank of the Yukon River approximately 270 miles west of Fairbanks, AK and 325 miles north-northwest of Anchorage, AK. Existing project: The project will provide approximately 1200 feet of riverbank protection when contributed funds are included. The protection will be in front of "New Town" Galena or the Alexander Lake area, thus extending the bank stabilization project the State started in 1985. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement is being developed. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Initiated plans and specifications. 18. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, BETHEL, AK Location. Kuskokwim River bank at Bethel, AK. Existing project. Work was authorized under the continuing authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. This authority allowed construction of emergency bank protection to prevent loss of the city's multipurpose bulkhead and petroleum dock. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, city of Bethel, provided construction easements and rights-of-way, and agreed to hold the United States free from damages and maintain and operate the completed bank protection works. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract was awarded in September 1985 and work was completed. Approximately 1,650 cubic yards of rock toe was constructed prior to the fall river freeze-up. 19. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $134,454 for disaster preparedness and emergency operations. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization study was: Aniak, $84,481. Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14, 526, 79th Cong. (preauthorization) Fiscal year cost for preauthorization study was: Anchor River, $7,500. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Gold Creek, Skagway River, Salmon River, Talkeetna River, and Klutina River during September 1986. Repairs at each project were recommended to the local authority. Total costs for the fiscal year: $7,807. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 21. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 28 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage of the initial phase which was completed in 1977 tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage which is under construction, will provide a tunnel to Crater Lake and add a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13-foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the undergound powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction provides for tapping Crater Lake (elevation 1,022 feet) to drive a third turbine to be installed in the existing underground powerhouse to provide an additional nameplate-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts. Estimated cost of initial phase construction is $139,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design is complete on the Crater Lake Phase including the feature design memorandum for power tunnel, penstock, lake tap, gate structure and surge tank; 100 percent completion of plans and specifications for completing the initial development including gate structure, penstock surge tank, machine shop powerhouse completion and lake tap; and 100 percent completion of plans and specifications for generator, powerhouse completion and electrical contracts. A study to determine the economic viability of proceeding with the development of the Long Lake Dam was undertaken. The initial construction contract of the Crater Lake Phase II was awarded August 1986. Work performed under the contract includes completion of the power tunnel, excavation of a surge shaft a gate shaft with access adit, performing a lake tap; installation of a penstock, turbine an sperical valve, governor, switchgear, and transformer; and completion of the powerhouse. General Investigations 22. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs of $1,752,771 for surveys include $275,822 for navigation studies, $1,323,638 for flood 40-6 ALASKA DISTRICT control studies, $32,000 for coordination studies and the Kuskokwim River. The recommended plan calls for $111,311 for miscellaneous activities, rock riprap protection for 8,500 feet of river bank with the rock extending from above the active wave zone to the 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA thalweg of the river. Technical assistance, information, flood plain manage- A Plan of Study was prepared for the General Design ment guidance and other flood plain management serv- Memorandum in FY 1984. ices have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, Ar- Work on the General Design Memorandum initiated chitectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions and in FY 1984 is 75% complete and scheduled for completion private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $135,124. in FY 1987. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $11,550. $614,000. Fiscal year costs were $259,183. 24. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK The proposed project would provide streambank protection to the city of Bethel, located in western Alaska on 40-7 TABLE 40-A REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1985 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 1. Anchorage Harbor, New Work AK Approp. - - Cost - - 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 946,000 1,225,405 307,000 915,017 -1,284,600 -633 113,000 301,525 266,000 295,862 30,000 78,817 294,000 316,897 Cordova Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 5. 6. 7. Homer Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Kake Harbor, AK King Cove Harbor AK 8. 9. Mekoryuk, AK Metlakatla Harbor AK 1,679,000 754,434 2,090 -106,290 1,1 2,0 52,800 53,677 350,000 325,219 1,723,000 1,729,421 70,000 72,435 - 8,057,500 - 8,010,237 30,000 70,000 )1,298 85,533 - 491,494 - 436,119 35,000 45,000 36,257 858 - - 533,235 - - 533,235 .81,725 1,102,000 16,512,172 )86,585 1,250,458 16,509,474 - -5,899 1,514,373 406 -77 1,514,373 - . 609,110 - - 609,110 i62,000 80,000 9,642,0001 i61,366 76,656 9,636,9951 - - 4,813,000 98,731 - 4,811,891 - - 548,790 - - 548,790 372,000 400,000 5,338,821 L21,969 393,395 5,321,772 - - 1,700 - - 1,700 - - 3,512,3502 - - 3,512,3502 50,000 65,000 2,463,711 49,655 63,991 2,462,288 - - 67,974 - - 67,974 358,960 - 8,316,4603 375,719 2,059 8,288,0153 25,000 15,000 870,700 34,887 4,507 856,944 - - 2,264,948 - - 2,264,948 76,000 -1,000 566,494 L31,314 -939 566,494 40,000 1,065,000 1,420,000 65,372 1,035,909 1,372,139 75,000 17,134 99,000 13,839 67,698 -1,000 84,161 4,922,470 4,912,300 148,520 148,520 12 9 2 2 -25,000 -229,000 28,597 -204,702 40-8 - 7,5 - 7,5 34 2 2 1 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 (Contrib. Funds) New Work 10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 11. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 12. Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 14. Bethel, Mission Road, Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK 15. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 16. Dillingham, Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK 17. Galena, Emergency Bank Stabilization. AK 18. Kuskokwim River, Bethel, AK (Contrib. Funds) Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - - - - 830,644 - - -206,827 150,923 772,096 - - - - 428,720 - - - - 428,720 237,000 300,000 156,000 200,000 3,320,476 244,916 302,425 155,806 197,723 3,317,991 - - - - 1,348,240 - - - - 1,348,240 291,000 273,000 561,000 1,195,045 8,149,952 532,403 367,979 407,142 1,245,955 8,024,785 - - - - 125 - - - - 125 2,500 510 -83,423 9,215 56,378 5,000 5,000 35,171 2,500 2,500 160,000 160,000 - 1,825,311 1,825,311 - 1,596,577 - 1,596,577 - 1,061,137 3,008 1,040,121 580,000 538,942 199,995,7654 199,964,5144 3,839,8245 3,782,7965 2,500 1,600,000 1,555,354 904,018 - 580,000 - 538,942 13,900,000 13,522,702 538,000 536,356 4,656,300 5,349,609 718,000 685,741 2,031,700 150,600 1,616,440 522,722 7,103,000 7,114,257 859,000 938,688 6,767 3,478,000 3,590,751 913,500 871,881 - 2,182,300 - 2,145,929 20,000 5,419 50,000 45,420 132,500 114,000 15,028 231,472 115,000 -85,000 30,000 20,000 5,419 50,000 45,420 246,500 246,500 30,000 30,000 40-9 TABLE 40-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1985 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section :Total to In Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 21. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. 570,000 1,499,700 7,997,000 3,505,000 96,954,556 Cost 1,157,838 1,258,244 8,226,946 3,561,846 96,934,479 1Includes judgment and associated cost. "Includes $2,672 of Code 710 Rec. Funds and $1,509,678 for previous project. 3Includes only actual Funds retained and cost incurred. 4Includes $310,000 for previous project (Fairbanks). 5Includes $1,624 for previous project (Fairbanks). 40-10 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 Aug. 15, 1985 July 3, 1958 July 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 2. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep water harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.1 Extension of project limits. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construct 7,700-foot-long small boat harbor and entrance channel by deepening, widening, and straightening the upper 6,800 feet of Brown's Slough. CORDOVA SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of 2,000-foot breakwater. Payment of judgment and associated interest. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. KING COVE HARBOR, AK Anchorage basin of 11 acres, 15 feet deep, an entrance channel 125 feet wide and 15 feet deep; an earth fill training dike; and a rockfill groin. MEKORYUK, AK Construction of 510-foot breakwater METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acres in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. 40-11 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 29, 1978 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineeers, April 23, 1981 P.L. 98-88 H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st, Sess.2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 S. Doc. 13, 90th Cong., 1st Sess.2 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 7, 1986 H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 3. 5. 6. 8. 9. REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1985 TABLE 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK July 3, 1958 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 July 14, 1960 Dec. 19, 1985 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 19, 1985 Dec. 19, 1985 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 11. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.3 Seawall PORT LIONS SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construction of a 600-foot breakwater and a 170-foot stub breakwater inclosing a 12-acre harbor. BETHEL, MISSION ROAD EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Construct protection stone layer'in front of bulkhead piling along Mission Road. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River.4 DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Relocate Water and Sewer Lines GALENA EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Provide approximately 1200 feet of riverbank protection in front of the Alexander Lake area. KUSKOKWIM RIVER, BETHEL, AK Construct rock and riprap mat in front of pile structures. SNETTISHAM, AK Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. 1Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2Contains latest published map. 3Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4Little Chena Dam classified "deferred". 40-12 H. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 9, 1979 Section 116 of P.L. 99-190 (H.J.Res. 465) S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 Section 116 of P.L. 99-190 (H.J.Res. 465) Section 116 of P.L. 99-190 (H.J.Res. 465) Section 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 13, 1985 H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.2 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 21. ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK 1 Completed 1920 $ 128,896 $ 2,154 Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Completed 1983 2,000,000 - Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Completed 1977 1,220,000 5,000 Cordova Harbor, AK Completed 1978 843,534 488,156 Craig Harbor, AK Completed 1983 1,033,5004 72,500 Douglas Harbor, AK Completed 1963 282,019 - Dry Pass, AK Completed 1983 943,351 23,466 Egegik River, AK Completed 1972 4,441 3,107 Elfin Cove, AK Completed 1959 154,191 - Gastineau Channel, AK Completed 1964 789,461 102,701 Haines Harbor, AK2 Completed 1977 1,000,0005 - Hoonah Harbor, AK Completed 1983 4,255,0006 - Humboldt Harbor, AK Completed 1977 3,679,683 - Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Completed 1941 66,037 - Juneau Harbor, AK Completed 1974 1,381,150 260,991 Kasilof Harbor, AK 2 Completed 1975 109,848 - Ketchikan Harbor, AK Completed 1979 1,602,417 331,256 Kodiak Harbor, AK Completed 1973 1,891,2128 37,946 Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Inactive 1970 9,700 - Naknek River, AK Completed 1961 20,789 - Neva and Olga Straits, AK Completed 1960 155,009 - Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Completed 1972 370,415 132,946 Pelican Harbor, AK Completed 1964 369,683 18,973 Petersburg Harbor, AK Completed 1972 252,932 26,800 Port Alexander, AK Completed 1949 17,000 - Rocky Pass, AK Completed 1960 337,668 - St. Michael Canal, AK Completed 1916 377,062 560 Seldovia Harbor, AK Completed 1974 1,051,8839 5,518 Sergius Whitestone, AK Completed 1973 1,798,010 1,934 Seward Harbor, AK Completed 1973 712,36910 219,789 Sitka Harbor, AK Completed 1973 1,611,009 15,490 Skagway Harbor, AK Completed 1972 133,180 32,665 Stikine River, AK Completed 1985 - 181,549 Valdez Harbor, AK Completed 1968 649,74011 221,498 Wrangell Harbor, AK Completed 1969 537,020 331,352 Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed 1979 3,562,343 309,260 1Adandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 7In addition, $857,000 of State funds. 8Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. o1 Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 11Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 40-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1985 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1986 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 - Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0061 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK2 Completed 1973 260,681 - Lowell Creek, AK Completed 1945 416,3823 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,770 4 5 162,9256 Skagway River, AK Deferred' 1966 26,385 - Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 - 11n addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 5In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 6In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 3In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 'Project eligible for deauthorization. 4Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Project Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) Bradley Lake, AK Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) For Last Full Report See Annual Report 1967 1983 1979 1949 1931 Date Deauthorized 1977 1982 1979 1977 1977 Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended $6,701,000 40-14 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public (Preauthorization) Study Identification Chignik, AK Dillingham Small Boat Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Larson Bay Small Boat Harbor, AK Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, AK Sand Point, AK Saxman, AK Seward, AK Togiak Harbor, AK Whittier, AK TOTAL Law 86-645 Fiscal Year Costs $ 95,558 27,915 105,854 160,913 37,647 22,956 58,840 14,583 10,598 70,626 $605,490 TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted ALASKA: Bethel Harbor October 1985 Iliuliuk Harbor October 1985 Kodiak Channel November 1985 Craig Harbor January 1986 Wrangell Harbor January 1986 Wrangell Narrows February 1986 Sitka Harbor March 1986 Hoonah Harbor March 1986 Skagway Harbor March 1986 Haines Harbor March 1986 Dry Pass Channel August 1986 Port Alexander Channel August 1986 Port Lions Harbor September 1986 40-15 BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and consists of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as chairman. Five members are division engineers with membership rotated among divisions having civil works missions. The seventh member, assigned full time to the board as Resident Member, also directs the staff in carrying out the responsibilities of the board. The board meets quarterly or on call of the chairman. The board has several statutory duties. It conducts independent reviews of Corps survey reports covering water resources projects and reports its conclusions and recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers then forwards the reports with his conclusions and recommendations to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) for transmission to the Congress. The board also conducts independent reviews of special reports ordered by the Congress. It considers and approves general plans for major modification and reconstruction of any lock, canal, canalized river or other work for the use or benefit of navigation. In addition to its statutory duties, the Chief of Engineers has assigned further duties to the board. It reviews corps policies and procedures as directed, additional special reports for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, reports of other Federal agencies pertaining to water resources development as directed, and conducts a 10-month program of in-service training for approximately 15 Corps planners annually - generally at GS 12 and 13 levels - in all aspects of Federal water resources development. The training program helps meet Corps needs for increased numbers of qualified people in the planning field. The board also has administrative responsibility for processing proposed reports of the Chief of Engineers, along with Final Environmental Impact Statements, to states and Federal agencies for their 90-day review. In addition to other duties, the resident member of the board has served as second alternate for the Secretary of the Army on the Foreign Trade Zones Board. The Secretary of the Army has also appointed the resident member to serve as his representative on the Committee of Alternates of the Foreign Trade Zones Board and authorized him to act directly on the secretary's behalf on all nondiscretionary matters involving foreign trade zones. This appointment relieves the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works of routine duties in this regard; however, discretionary matters concerning the Foreign Trade Zones Board remain under previous delegations of authority. Total membership of the board is fixed by law at seven. In December 1982, the Chief of Engineers instituted a mechanism for predesignating future members, based on their time of service as division engineers, geographical factors, and other criteria. This procedure achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the board. Members Designate attend and participate in meetings of the board, but are not permitted to vote on board actions. The membership of the board as of September 1, 1986 was as follows: Members: Major General Norman G. Delbridge, Jr., Chairman, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Casimir Pulaski Building, Washington, DC Major General Jerome B. Hilmes, Division Engineer, Southwestern, Dallas, TX Major General George R. Robertson, Division Engineer, North Pacific, Portland, OR Major General Thomas A. Sands, Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS Brigadier General Ernest Edgar III, Division Engineer, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA Brigadier General Charles E. Dominy, Division Engineer, Missouri River, Omaha, NE Colonel Robert B. Wilson, Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Fort Belvoir, VA Members Designate: Brigadier General Joseph Pratt, Division Engineer, North Central, Chicago, IL Brigadier General Charles E. Williams, Division Engineer, North Atlantic, New York, NY Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the board completed 28 official report reviews during Fiscal Year (FY) 1986. The favorable reports category includes favorable recommended projects for Federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the Federal government. Reports Recommending Favorable for Federal Construction- The board recommended 18 projects at an estimated total first cost of $1,358,048,000, of which $1,307,875,000 is the first cost to the United States. A listing of the projects follows: Lower Ohio River Navigation, IL and KY Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE Pearl River Basin, MS* Guadalupe River and Adjacent Streams, CA Slidell-Pearlington, LA and MS Fort Pierce Harbor, FL Pine Bluff Harbor Expansion, AR *Report was too late to be included in FY 85 Report 41-1 Upper Santa Ana River, CA - Flood Storage Alternatives Study Martin County, FL Twin Valley Lake, MN - Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan Guadalupe River, Channel to Victoria, TX Wolf and Jordan Rivers and Bayou Portage, MS Galveston County Shore, TX Arthur Kill Channel, NY and NJ Hazard, KY - Local Protection Project St. Marys Falls Canal Lock Facilities, MI Upper Alameda Creek Urban Study, CA Tucson Urban Study, AZ Reports Recommending Unfavorably for Federal Construction. During FY 1986, the board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for Federal construction on 9 projects: Dredged Material Containment, Long Island Sound, Drainage Control, CT and NY San Diego County Streams, CA Raritan River Basin, NJ Kissimmee River, FL Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Corridor Study Susquehanna River Basin, NY, PA, and MD Six Mile Cypress Slough, FL South Yadkin River, NC Escambia River, Escambia County, FL General Design Memoranda: The board reviewed and submitted favorable recommendations on one General Design Memorandum during the reporting period: Wears Creek, Jefferson City, Missouri. During Fiscal Year 1986, the board held five meetings: October 30, 1985, March 5 and 6, 1986, April 17, 1986, June 4, 1986, and October 7, 1986. Since 1902, the board has acted on 8,752 reports, recommending favorably on 3,908 and unfavorably on 4,844. 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: BG Thomas A. Sands, U.S. Army, President, appointed May 10, 1985; Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sept. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; BG Jerome B. Hilmes, U.S. Army, appointed Nov. 21, 1983; RA John D. Bossler, NOAA, appointed Mar. 14, 1984; BG Robert J. Dacey, appointed May 10, 1985; COL Dennis B. Bulger served as Secretary of the Commission. There is one civilian/engineer vacancy due to the death of Mr. Roy T. Sessums on Mar. 10, 1984. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of four salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a streambank erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portion east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds- Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Field operations of the Commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $9,902,820,000 (Cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep.30, 1986, of $4,143,861,589, the entire project is about 78.4 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928. 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See volume 1 of two-volume Port Series No. 21, 1979, "Ports on the Gulf Coast of the United States," for Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1981, for New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (53rd edition), 1985. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, including maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1986, was $4,166,358,837. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 326th session was held on Sept. 23-27, 1985, on board the Motor Vessel Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees and channel conditions were observed en route. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and Morgan City, LA, with approximately 170 people in attendance. This session adjourned at Morgan City, LA, at 10:45 a.m., Sept. 27, 1985. The 327th session was held on Apr. 21-25, 1986 on board the U.S. MV Mississippi en route on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed en route. On Apr. 21, 1986, the Commission members and staff made a tour of the Reelfoot Lake and Tiptonville, TN area. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 175 people in attendance at these meetings. This session adjourned at 10:10 a.m., Apr. 25, 1986. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap- type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1985 (53rd) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. The 1986 folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Atchafalaya River was revised and will be printed. Approximately 684 flight-line miles of infra-red color; 7,587 flight-line miles of black-and-white aerial photography (various scales); 100 flight-line miles of color photography; and about 206.75 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District-Revisions of Chef Menteur, and Spanish Fort, LA, 1:62,500-scale quadrangles and New Orleans Area Map, 1:250,000-scale are completed. Revision of Breton Sound Map, 1:250,000-scale is nearing completion. Memphis District-Series conversion of USGS 1:24,000 scale to 1:62,500 scale quads of Piggott, Marmaduke, Kennett, Leachville, Manila, Marked Tree, Horseshoe Lake and Tilton are complete. Vicksburg District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quadrangles Crowder, MS; Oakland, MS; Grenada, MS; Sledge, MS; Horn Lake, MS; Crenshaw, MS; Camden, AR; Princeton, AR; and Warren, AR, is in progress. Hernando, MS was completed. 1:250,000 scale maps of Helena, Greenwood, Jackson, and Natchez were printed. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 45.8 feet at Cairo gage on Dec. 5, 1985, and maximum discharge of 1,028,000 cubic feet per second, occurred on March 5, 1985, at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 28.9 feet at Memphis on Dec. 8-9, 1985, with maximum discharge of 1,110,000 cubic feet per second on Dec. 9, 1985. Vicksburg District-No significant flooding occurred in the Vicksburg District during FY 86. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City - 32.5 feet on Dec. 4, 1985, and maximum discharge of 1,308,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg - 38.7 feet on Dec. 16, 1985, and maximum discharge of 1,312,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez - 46.3 feet on Dec. 16, 1985, and maximum discharge of 1,303,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District-On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 50.51 feet NGVD on Dec. 17, 1985, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 14.40 feet NGVD on Dec. 17, 1985. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 33.0 feet NGVD on Dec. 19, 1985. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public 42-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. Actions taken on various requests for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D), follow: West Memphis, AR Feasibility Report-The MRC Report dated May 5, 1983, contained recommendations for 23.86 miles of channel improvement on Ten and Fifteen Mile Bayous, restrictive easements and a limited revegetation program and to provide a 10-year degree of protection in urban and rural areas. The total estimated cost of this recommended improvement is $21,300,000 (Oct. 86). Helena, AR and Vicinity Feasibility Report--The MRC Report dated Dec. 16, 1982, contained recommendations for a 225 cfs pumping station, 1.85 miles of channel enlargement to contain a 10 year storm and 7' x 7' gated culvert at Long Lake. The total estimated cost of this improvement is $14,100,000 (Oct. 86). Yazoo Backwater Project, Mississippi, Mitigation Report. The Chief of Engineers Report dated July 12, 1984, recommended the acquisition of perpetual landuse easements on 11,300 acres of woodlands, or any combination of easements and fee title that would provide the same level of mitigation for fish and wildlife losses associated with the Yazoo Area Pump Project. The total estimated cost of this acquisition is $4,993,000 (Oct. 85). Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, Louisiana and Mississippi Feasibility Report-The Chief of Engineers Report, dated May 19, 1986, contained recommendations for a diversion structure through the mainline Mississippi River levee adjacent to the Bonnet Carre Spillway; inflow and outflow channels; a sediment trap; and levee modifications necessary to accommodate the diversion structure. Total estimated cost of the recommended improvement is $57,000,000. Southwest Mississippi Tributaries Basin, MS Feasibility Report-The Chief of Engineers Report dated June 12, 1986, concurred in the recommendation of the President, MRC. No further investigations of flooding, bank stabilization erosion, and sedimentation, in the Southwest Mississippi are warranted. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major cause-and-effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and manmade modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 17.7 miles of levees and surfaced 10.3 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 11.8 mile of berms, and enlarged 2.4 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Constructed 5.9 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42- M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.3 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.5 are in place with 1,183.6 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.1 miles, of which 2,195.3 are in place with 1,608.9 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place with 280.8 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 723.4 miles of berms, 510.5 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,800.5 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,608.2 miles of authorized levees off the main stem, of which 1,117.2 are in place with 876.6 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 800.7 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, pages 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G). Work included dredging 29,781,300 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp) was maintained by Unit Price dredge DAVE BLACKBURN. Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin and leased cutterhead dredge George D. Williams. The MR&T Harbors, in the Vicksburg District, maintained were Greenville and Vicksburg by leased cutterhead, George D. Williams. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by Government-owned 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION dustpan dredge, Burgess, leased cutterhead dredge, Natchez, and leased dustpan dredge, Lenel Bean. The MR&T Harbor maintained was Memphis Harbor (MCKeller Lake). Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 13.78 miles of new bank revetment and 105,432 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 4.26 miles of new dikes were constructed and 4.76 miles required for maintenance. In addition, work on tributaries consisted of 1.10 miles of new bank revetment and 15,599 squares of concrete mattress for maintenance. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 865.49 miles of operative bank revetment and 215.39 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9- by 300-feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 65.03 miles of revetment and 5.2 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued on the east and west protection levees. One contract on the west protection levee was completed over a distance of 2.3 miles with placement of 144,124 cubic yards; and on the east protection levee, one contract was completed over a distance of 3.6 miles with placement of 359,600 cubic yards during this period. An additional 11.9 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction on the west protection levee with placement of 1,462,364 cubic yards during this period. A contract for 5.2 miles of steel sheet piling in the east protection levee was completed. Construction of the new Morgan City floodwall, north of Brashear Avenue, is 98 percent complete. On the east protection levee, two floodwall contracts, a total of 4.6 miles, were completed, and one contract for 1.1 miles of floodwall is under construction. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrell Locks, Morganza Control Structure, and numerous drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. Maintenance by contract: Contract for a culvert replacement at Melville was initiated Dec. 17, 1985, and completed Feb. 15, 1986. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 1,309,356 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between Jul. 7 and Sep. 7, 1986. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 72 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $1,423,000,000 and non- Federal cost of $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 280.8 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works in the lower basin, control of distribution of flows through Wax Lake Outlet, and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Drainage improvements in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area have not been initiated. Approximately 36.7 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by contract: Dredging for the removal of shoal from the entrance channel was performed, resulting in the removal of 94,676 cubic yards between Aug. 27 and 31, 1986. 42-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $26,500,000 and non- Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies and placement of revetment (articulated concrete mattress) in the auxiliary structure inflow channel. New work by contract: Old River Control Auxiliary Structure, Phase II construction was completed Sep. 5, 1986. Stone bank paving in the auxiliary structure outflow channel was completed Mar. 24, 1986, with 270,815 tons of stone placed. Bank stabilization in the inflow channel is 52 percent complete with 175,190 tons of stone placed during this period. Dredging of shoal material from the auxiliary structure inflow and outflow channels resulted in the removal of 1,438,089 cubic yards between Jul. 1 and Sep. 15, 1986. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channel to the low-sill control structure during high river stages, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: From Sep. 8 to 13, 1986, 170,000 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay, and 22,000 cubic yards of shoal from the lock tailbay. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is 96 percent complete based on the current estimated Federal cost of $306,000,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low sill structure, February 1961; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 6.2 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Principal item remaining to complete the project consists of bank stabilization of the inflow channel. Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, ARK AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design were continued on project features. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation, except for the Rowdy Bend recreational facility; scheduled for award in FY 87, and two future recreational sites. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure is complete and the pumping plant is scheduled for completion in FY 87. Structural mitigation features for this project are scheduled to be constructed in FY 87 and FY 88. Design and right-ofway acquisition are continuing for the remainder of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee enlargement. An 8A contract has been completed for construction of the 1.5-mile connecting channel and drainage structure at 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION the Six Mile Bayou Project. A contract for Sicily Island Item 1A is complete. Item 1A includes 1.0 mile of levee and a water control structure (two 60" pipes). An 8A contract for construction of Item 1B which included 2.8 miles of levee, has also been completed. Preparation of the Fool River Bayou Pumping Plant design document is being initiated. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM is under way. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. A Reevaluation report for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61.0, and the Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal project has been completed and work on the Phase II GDM is under way. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 19.0 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 68.6 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Hired labor forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. (c) Main stem. Construction is complete on the Wasp Lake Drainage Structure and levee closure. A contract was awarded on Sep. 29, 1986, at a contract amount of $1,662,543 for Bee Lake Drainage Structure. Planning is underway to provide levee closure at Bee Lake. A contract was awarded on Aug. 22, 1986 for $457,512, for bank stabilization at Site 3 Greenwood Bendway. Channel maintenance. No clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control were exercised in the Yazoo Basin Main Stem in FY 85. (d) Big Sunflower River, etc. A contract is scheduled for award on Item 66A, Steele Bayou Channel Improvement, Miles 63.0 to 68.7. Plans and specifications are being prepared for the next item which is scheduled foraward in March 1988. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is proceding with approximately 80% complete. Panola-Quitman Levee Item C(r) was awarded in FY 83 and is substantially complete. Levee work associated with Item 1, Pelucia Creek is substantially completed. Pelucia Creek, Item 1A was awarded September 29, 1986. (2) Channels. Removal of a portion of the plug on Alligator-Catfish Bayou channel at the site of bridge relocations was accomplished. The Alligator-Catfish channel enlargement project is now complete except for removal of the remaining portion of the plug. Controls in Alligator-Catfish channel may be necessary prior to removal of the plug. A study is under way to evaluate these needs. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is under way. (3) Bank Stabilization. A construction contract for Tillatoba Creek Phase II was completed in Dec. 84. The planning of the Pelucia Creek Levee Project, printed as Supplement B to the Greenwood Protection Works (GDM #1), is complete. Pelucia Creek, Item 1 contract was awarded Jun. 24, 1985, and is still under construction. Pelucia Creek, Item 1A was awarded Sep. 30, 1986 at a cost of $897,655. Channel maintenance was continued for Yalobusha, Little Tallahatchie, and Yocona Rivers; Cassidy, David, Burrell, and Bobo Bayous; and Ascalmore Creek, by random clearing and snagging and herbicide willow control. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 248.76 feet NGVD on July 4, 1986, when storage in the flood control pool was 250,500 acre-feet. Peak 24-hr. inflow was 9,100 cubic feet per second on Jun. 6,1986. On Sep. 30, 1986, pool elevation was 241.81 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 158,800 acrefeet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects 42-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 211.92 feet NGVD on July 4, 1986, when storage in the flood control pool was 446,100 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 21,800 cubic feet per second on Jun. 7, 1986. On Sep. 30, 1986, the pool elevation was 206.79 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 305,200 acre-feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages was begun in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee; portable pumps; area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Construction of the levee and two of the drainage structures was completed in FY 82. The remaining feature of the Coffeeville project was completed in early FY 84. (h) Sardis Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 258.36 feet NGVD on July 2, 1986, when storage in the flood control pool was 560,400 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 15,000 cubic feet per second on June 9, 1986. On Sep. 30, 1986, the pool elevation was 241.89 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 184,500 acrefeet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 was clogged with sediment restricting releases from the lake. This reach has been dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging was completed in August 1982. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 227.39 feet NGVD on Jun. 14, 1986, and storage in flood control pool was 239,900 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 20,500 cubic feet per second on Jun. 6, 1986. On Sep. 30,. 1986, the pool elevation was 216.51 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 83,600 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo Area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed in FY 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. A GDM for a pumping station of 17,500 cfs to reduce this ponding was approved Jul. 12, 1985. Later budgetary guidance reduced the pumping plant capacity to 10,000 CFS. A contract for portions of the inlet and outlet channel excavation for the pumping plant was awarded in March 1986. Although design on remaining features has continued, construction of the pumping plant is pending approval of the Assistant Secretary of the Army and there is no scheduled expenditure of funds beyond FY 86. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Item 1A was awarded in March 1985. Plans and specifications are being prepared for levee Item 1B with award scheduled for March 1986. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs are now complete. Two of the three remaining reservoirs will be constructed when funds are appropriated. One reservoir has been indefinitely delayed because of right-of-way problems. Pumping stations for Greentrees 8 and 3 are under construction and will be completed in FY 87. Pumping stations for Greentrees 1 & 7 are scheduled for award in FY 87. (k) Upper Yazoo projects. The first seven items of work, approximately 54 miles of channel improvement has been completed. This work extends from Yazoo city to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, MS. About 1.6 miles of channel enlargement along the Belzoni Front was skipped until bank stabilization problems at this location were resolved. The next item of work, Item 2-B, consisting of the 1.6 miles of channel improvement and bank stabilization along the Belzoni Front that was previously skipped is now under construction. Planning is continuing on upstream channel and levee work. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek 1A; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations and continued in the same manner in FY 86. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to six demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin Hill area. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION is about 35 percent complete. A total of 50.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. The ongoing Yazoo Basin Comprehensive Study will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. During FY 86, considerable progress was made in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. The district completed construction of two major grade control structures and 41,900 linear feet of bank stabilization. Construction of five major grade control structures and 28,700 linear feet of bank stabilization was initiated during the year. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY29 and is 90 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $42,000,000. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized, are complete to approved grade and section. (See Table 42-L for status of levees and Table 42-I for status of revetments. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River Drainage. Channel Improvement, Castor River, Item No. 2, Transition Reach awarded Oct. 31, 1985, completed Jan. 24, 1986. (b) Upper St. Francis River. Ditch 251 channel cleanout awarded Jul. 9, 1985, completed Dec. 18, 1985. Upper Ditch 1 channel cleanout awarded Jun. 26, 1985, completed Mar. 18, 1986. Ditch 81 channel cleanout awarded Jun. 28, 1985, completed Dec. 24, 1986. Stateline Ditch channel cleanout awarded May 17, 1985, 68 percent complete. Drainage Ditch 17 Storage Building awarded May 6, 1985, completed Feb. 24, 1986. Highway 181, Ditch 29, bridge alterations awarded Jul. 12, 1985. Highway 18 alterations awarded Dec. 12, 1984, completed Jul. 22, 1986. Upper Buffalo Creek Bridges 30.70 and 33.04 awarded Jul. 31, 1985, completed Apr. 25, 1986. Upper Buffalo Creek Bridges 29.65 and 34.10 awarded Jul. 29, 1985, completed Apr. 9, 1986. Belle Fountain Ditch, alteration of Missouri State Highway NN bridge awarded Jul. 16, 1986, 1 percent complete. State Line Ditch 29 alteration of Arkansas State Highway 181 bridge awarded Jul. 12, 1985, 70 percent complete. Upper Buffalo Creek alteration of Missouri State Highway 164 and N awarded Jun. 27, 1985, 60 percent complete. State Line Outlet Ditch alteration of Arkansas Highway 18 awarded Jan. 3, 1984, completed Jul. 22, 1986. Upper Buffalo Creek channel enlargement awarded Sep. 23, 1986, 1 percent complete. Alternation of railroad bridge, Item No. 2, Blackfish Bayou awarded Aug. 10, 1984, completed Aug. 27, 1986. Alteration of Arkansas State Highway 119, Upper Buffalo Creek, awarded Aug. 29, 1983, 78 percent complete. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Upper Buffalo Creek Alterations of Highways 77 and 119 awarded Aug. 29, 1983, 90 percent complete. Huxtable Access Road awarded Sept. 17, 1985. Helena Floodwall awarded Aug. 23, 1985. Blackfish Bayou Item 2 awarded Jun. 28, 1985, completed Jul. 2, 1986. Ditches 9 and 10 awarded Jun. 13, 1985, completed Jul. 3, 1986. Blackfish Bayou Item 2 Railroad Bridge awarded Aug. 10, 1984, completed Aug. 2, 1986. Asphalt surfacing, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant, awarded Sep. 22, 1986, 1 percent complete. Repair oil and water leakage, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Station, awarded Oct. 25, 1985, completed Apr. 20, 1986. Outlet channel scour repair, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant, awarded Oct. 11, 1985, 31 percent complete. Reconstruction of access road, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Station, awarded Sep. 17, 1985, completed Dec. 21, 1985. Big Lake Floodway, ditch bank repair, awarded Sep. 23, 1986, 1 percent complete. Bank repair, Ditch No. 81, Big Lake area, awarded Sep. 23, 1986, 1 percent complete. Castor River bank repair, Missouri flood control, awarded Aug. 22, 1986, 75 percent complete. Riprap stone protection at Arkansas State Highway 139, Big Slough Drainage Ditch, awarded Jan. 22, 1985, 95 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 76 percent complete. (b) Upper and Lower St. Francis River and Tributaries. Project was initiated during 1937 and is 78 percent complete. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Graham Burke cleaning and painting awarded Sep. 26, 1984, completed Mar. 28, 1986. Water service to Graham Burke Pumping Station, awarded Aug. 20, 1986, 1 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Graham Burke Pumping Plant, metallizing impellers and exhaust system, awarded Sep. 17, 1982, was completed Sep. 29, 1983. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no 42-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, TN. South Fork-Forked Deer River awarded Aug. 22, 1985. Obion River Channel Improvement awarded Aug. 29, 1984, was completed Aug. 9, 1986. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 59 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Fowlkes Channel Item 1-1 on the South Fork was awarded Aug. 22, 1985. Forked Deer River channel improvement was completed Apr. 17, 1986. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 41 percent complete. Work resumed in Sep. 1985 after having a court injunction lifted in May 1985. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) L-10 AC Cairo awarded Sep. 27, 1985. Birds Point-New Mardid awarded Aug. 21, 1985, completed Oct. 13, 1986. Seepage control-Parcel 3 Cairo Mound City Jun. 25, 1985, completed Sep. 12, 1986. Seepage control R05AC Parcel I Cairo, Mound City awarded Aug. 27, 1984, completed Jul. 18, 1986. Caruthersville floodwall repairs awarded Mar. 27, 1984, completed Dec. 6, 1984. L-628 Rena Lara Coahoma awarded Sep. 30, 1985. Levee roadway resurfacing, Point Pleasant, MO, awarded Sep. 26, 1986, 1 percent complete. Levee roadway resurfacing, Concord, MO, awarded Sep. 22, 1986, 25 percent complete. Levee roadway resurfacing, Cottonwood Point, MO, awarded Sep. 23, 1986, 5 percent complete. Wave wash repairs, Parcel I, below Hickman, KY, awarded Nov. 12, 1985, completed Sep. 16, 1986. Floodwall alterations, Hickman Floodway, awarded Oct. 24, 1985, 80 percent complete. Levee work, Item No. L-101, Parcel 2, above Cairo, awarded Sep. 27, 1985, 51 percent complete. Levee work, seepage control, Parcel 3, Cairo Mound City, awarded Jun. 25, 1985, completed Sep. 12, 1986. Levee work, seepage control, Parcel I, Cairo-Mound City, awarded Aug. 27, 1984, completed Aug. 25, 1986. Nash Relief Wells, Parcel I, Cape Girardeau, MO, awarded Mar. 30, 1984, 92 percent complete. Levee work, Item R-678, Walnut Bend, AR, awarded Jul. 16, 1986, 96 percent complete. Construction of a chemical storage facility, Ensley Engineering Yard, Memphis, awarded Dec. 11, 1985, completed Aug. 28, 1986. Excavation of drainage ditches, Rena Lara, MS, awarded Sep. 20, 1985, completed May 31, 1986. Helena Floodwall repairs, Helena, AR, awarded Aug. 23, 1985, completed Dec. 9, 1985. Levee work, Lambethville, awarded May 31, 1984, completed Sep. 30, 1985. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL Dredging, revetment, and 10-81 11-25 38 45 59 75 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 101-234 127-129 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 306-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 contraction work Main line levee, right bank Main line setback, left bank The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Myrtle Grove, LA Caernarvon (Scarsdale), LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre Floodway, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. 42-11 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. TABLE 42-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 803-873 Tiptonville-Obion River Main line levee, left bank, levee Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, extension, and diversion Obion 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. River 857 Near Mud Lake, TN Pumping station and adjacent Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, channel improvements 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. 890 St. Johns Bayou, MO Drainage floodgate and levee Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 closure Act. 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO Drainage floodgate and levee Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 closure Act. 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Floodway, right bank 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Main line levee, left bank 922 Hickman, KY Floodwall, left bank 946 Peafield, MO Drainage floodgate Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Floodwalls and levees 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Floodwalls, levees, and pumping Mounds, Mound City, and plant vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on miles above mouth of Ohio RivE Upper Mississippi River, 39 42-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 29 40 40 40 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA' Atchafalaya Basin. Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel' Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Flood ways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. 42-13 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 41 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Bouef diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Enlargement, realinement, clearing and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure 42-14 Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee. Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Boeuf River, AR, and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou LaFourche Boeuf River, AR, and LA above Bayou LaFourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing (2, 3) Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvements Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977. MR&T authority. 2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526. 2, 3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 42-15 87 82-145 3-56 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 TABLE 42-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-160 0-16 0-0.2 Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Tributaries of Boeuf River- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank (5) Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. 42-16 Clearing 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 Locality Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee 42-17 Improvement Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Remarks See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. TABLE 42-B (Continued) Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Locality Improvement 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR, AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station 42-18 Remarks (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970, See Table 42-D. _ I MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 0-47 Obion Creek, KY Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 89-298. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO Levees Mile 49 above Cairo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, MO Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). ILLINOIS RIVER, IL 0-120 Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, Floodwall, levee, revetment, and IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans district. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526. 3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, NGVD 193 230 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231 268 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 52 50 132 89 229 Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 42-20 TABLE 42-D MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carr6 Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River; construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie, LA Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' 42-21 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351, 72d Cong. Public 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 42-D (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA Bank protection, Amite River, LA Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN Improve Greenville Harbor, MS 42-22 ~ Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS 42-23 H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report Approved-Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively.4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel imorovements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from ashington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 42-24 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1- Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. 42-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Unpublished Vicksburg Ind. on VXD Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel District report dated May May 31, 1977, works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Letter Report.2 Six Mile Bayous, LA Jun. 28, 1980 The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, for the preservation and development of environmental 1980. resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. Energy and For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, Water projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of 1980. Development flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, Appropriation $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available Act, 1981 for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc. for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Supplemental Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, Appropriations Bill (PL Bill for FY engineering and construction of 41 water resources projects, 99-88) Ending Sep. including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. The bill 30, 1985 (PL provides that the funds appropriated shall lapse on Jun. 30, 1986 99-88) unless formal cost-sharing agreements have been reached with the local sponsor. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing will be as recommended in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, Feb. 28, 1983. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 42-26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on 1946, p. 1053 north bank of Arkansas River (portion belbw Plum Bayou). Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De 1946, p. 1083 Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA 1945, p. 982 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA 1948, p.1059 (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p.773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 42-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1986 Completed features 2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River- South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake, TN & KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Eight Mile Creek, AR Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) TOTAL $ 199,238,000 1,218,000,000 4,480,0003 4,000,0003 3,008,000,000 1,423,000,000 20,300,000 301,300,000 28,400,0003 50,000,000 53,000,000 442,000,000 35,000,0003 130,900,0003 1,276,000,000 16,802,0003 37,100,0003 157,000,000 371,000,000 10,200,000 99,000,000 17,900,0003 (10,400,000)3 440,000 9,960,000 21,000,0003 40,000,0003 105,000,000 6,700,000 7,100,000 $ 9,092,820,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche- Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period.) 42-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1986 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 - 94.7 94.7 Main stem channel 234-320 - 0.0 0.0 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 - 2,710.7 2,710.7 Vicksburg Harbor 437 140.2 140.2 Greenville Harbor 537 213.9 213.9 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 25,480.9 25,480.9 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 1,140.9 1,140.9 TOTAL 29,781.3 29,781.3 42-29 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .................. 12 Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ............. 22 Buras, LA .................. 25 Tropical Bend, LA ............ 30 Bayou Lamoque, LA .......... 33 Port Sulphur, LA ............. 39 Point Michel, LA ............. 44 Bohemia, LA................. 46 Diamond, LA ................ 49 Gravolet, LA................. 51 Junior, LA .................. 54 Harlem, LA ................. 56 Myrtle Grove, LA ............. 59 Monsecour, LA ............... 61 Alliance, LA................. 62 Belair, LA .................. 65 Jesuit Bend, LA .............. 68 Linwood, LA................. 71 Oak Point, LA ............... 72 Scarsdale, LA................ 75 English Turn, LA ............ 78 Poydras, LA ................ 82 Cutoff, LA .................. 88 Third district reach, LA ....... 93 Algiers Point, LA ............. 95 Gouldsboro Bend, LA ......... 96 Gretna Bend, LA ............. 97 Greenville Bend, LA .......... 100 Carrollton Bend, LA .......... 104 Avondale Bend, LA ........... 109 Kenner, LA................. 114 Luling,LA ................. 119 Good Hope, LA............... 126 Waterford, LA............... 128 Montz, LA .................. 132 Lucy, LA ................. 136 Reserve, LA ................ 138 Willow Bend, LA ............. 141 Angelina, LA................ 145 Vacherie, LA................. 148 Belmont, LA ................. 152 R RRRLRRLRL RLRLRLRLRLRLRLRRRR LRL R L R L R L R L R L - 4,325 4,763 790 185 20,921 - 28,306 80 8,559 - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 8,559 1,952 3,475 2,175 - 8,740 12,321 5,961 16,210 0 15,430 17,283 25,012 7,264 36,995 21,932 n 12,380 8,750 17,435 19,345 15,148 15,925 10,020 Z 9,750 22,841 2 22,860 10,638 12,377 11,575 m 16,408 45,864 21,256 27,167 7,728 4,960 9,662 - 22,045 o 15,015 26,696 37,167 28,908 16,298 12,295 17,502 17,826 20,947 7,618 19,000 13,295 25,575 14,500 03 0 Rich Bend, LA .............. 157 Romeville, LA ............... 161 St. Alice, LA................. 165 Burnside, LA................ 170 Aben, LA ................... 172 St. Elmo, LA................. 174 Smoke Bend, LA ............. 177 Marchand, LA............... 180 Philadelphia Point, LA ........ 183 New River Bend, LA .......... 185 White Castle, LA ............. 193 St. Gabriel, LA .............. 201 Plaquemine Bend, LA ......... 209 Manchac, LA................. 215 Missouri Bend, LA ........... 222 Arlington, LA................ 227 Port Allen, LA .............. 231 Allendale, LA................ 238 Springfield Bend, LA ......... 244 Arboth, LA ................. 250 Faulkner Lake, LA ........... 253 Grand Bay, LA .............. 258 Bayou Sara, LA ............. 265 Red Store, LA ............... 269 Arrow Bend, LA ............. 272 Boies Point, LA .............. 275 Morganza, LA .............. 279 Iowa Point, LA .............. 282 Brunette Point, LA ........... 285 Greenwood Bend, LA ......... 289 Hog Point, LA .............. 296 Carr Point, LA .............. 304 Above Old River, LA .......... 305 Fort Adams, MS ............. 308 Point Breeze, LA ............. 313 Coochie, LA ................ 317 Palmetto, MS ............... 322 Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ....... RLRLRL RL RL RLRL RL RRLRLRLRLRRLRLRRRLRRL - 1,866 3,394 2,203 7,562 4,732 29,635 (5.61 Miles) 50 6,949 50 13,893 200 16,794 - - 400 39,666 26,946 965 162,034 1,725 10,177 734 5,374 1,512 8,059 826 3,267 1,107 5,291 392 543 2,156 2,312 - 14,441 63,658 (2.74 Miles) 1,580 1,674 7,128 3,286 11,185 1,402,108 (265.55 Miles) 27,408 21,625 27,052 22,145 10,063 10,240 17,075 10,144 5,379 33,414 35,536 26,809 36,137 35,480 22,632 12,244 14,073 25,502 25,690 13,190 4,732 7,090 16,958 11,315 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 8,038 14,987 13,368 8,600 4,800 17,219 11,165 17,150 30.864 39,353 Dikes: None OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel .............. 315 Inflow channel ............... 315 Outflow channel .............. 315 Total standard revetment, Old River .............. L RR 5,790 2,415 4,365 48,081 25,681 5,790 48,081 32,461 5,790 - 48,081 (1.10 Miles) I 32,461 (6.15 Miles) TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Below Confluence ATCHAFALAYA RIVER of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ................ 1 Coville, Bayou, LA ............ 3 Legonier, LA ............. 4 Simmesport, LA ............. 6 Kuhlman Bayou, LA .......... 7 Odenburg, LA ............... 9 Cason, LA .................... 12 McCrea, LA ................ 13 Woodside, LA ................ 14 Provosty, LA ................ 17 Crooked Bayou, LA ........... 18 Mercier, LA ................. 22 Barberton, LA .............. 23 Evans Point, LA .............. 24 Goudeau, LA ................ 26 Morris Bayou, LA ............. 27 Goodwood, LA ............... 28 Red Cross, LA ............... 29 Melville, LA ................ 30 Cross Bayou, LA .............. 31 Melville South, LA............ 33 Toles, LA ................... 35 Petite Prairie, LA ............ 36 Holloway Lake, LA .......... 37 Bayou Sherman, LA .......... 38 Krotz Springs, LA ............ 40 Sherburne, LA ............... 43 Bayou Big Graw, LA .......... 46 Morgan City ................ 115 Total standard revetment ... L RL RL RRLRLRLRL R LRLRL R L R LL RRR L 930 - 930 (0.18 Mile) -30 -M01i e 3,431 3,431 4,150 6,550 8,940 10,636 5,565 5,375 10,798 5,027 13,002 7,768 9,600 10,478 3,592 4,898 3,938 3,800 8,505 8,065 4,870 3,815 4,070 6,355 8,381 7,085 5,200 4,625 7,035 8,394 3,410 193,927 (36.73 Miles) 1,893 1,361 1,886 1,968 1,105 910 3,846 2,630 15,599 Dikes: None LOWER RED RIVER Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA .............. Naples, LA ................. Turnbull Island, LA .......... Total standard revetment Below Confluence of Old River Outflow Channel and Red River 10 79 RRL - - - - - - - 6,652 - - - - - - - 6,190 - - - - - - 11,038 - - - - - - - 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Operaerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........... 329 Dead Mans Bend, MS ......... 335 Railroad Landing, MS ......... 346 St. Catherine Bend, LA ........ 350 Morville, LA ................ 356 Natchez Island, MS ........... 357 Carthage, MS................ 361 Natchez Front, MS ........... 364 Gibson, LA ................. 371 Ashland, LA-MS ............. 374 Kempe Bend, LA ............ 383 Browns Field, LA ............ 389 Goldbottom, MS.............. 392 Hardscrabble, LA ............ 398 Grand Gulf, MS .............. 403 Point Pleasant, MS-LA ........ 413 Togo Island, LA .............. 415 Lake Karnac, LA-MS ......... 419 Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... 423 Reid-Bedford, LA ............ 429 Racetrack, MS............... 433 Barge Line Terminal, MS ..... 437 Vicksburg Harbor, MS ........ 437 Delta Point, LA .............. 437 King's Point-Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ......... 439 False Point, LA .............. 443 Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS .................... 446 Milliken Bend, LA ............ 453 Belle Island, LA-MS .......... 460 Goodrich, LA................. 467 Cottonwood Bar, MS, TF ...... 470 Fitler-Cottonwood, MS ........ 474 Hagaman, LA ............... 481 Ben Lomond, MS ............. 486 Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS . ........... 488 Lake Providence, LA .......... 489 Mayersville, MS ............. 497 Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS .................... 503 RLL RRRLL RL RRL RLRRL RRL LL R LR LRLRR LRL R RL 865 1,600 990 3,275 115 4,168 5161 4,882 11,262 7,770 1,915 130 1,210 530 900 50 1,030 530 780 855 703 5,080 2186 200 1,783 391 8,311 3,818 2,467 - 3,192 4,437 20,805 0 19,145 y 11,595 28,093 11,815 2,180 14,700 6,510 23,725 22,137 28,285 9,280 30,250 22,530 53,948 Z 32,345 5,670 2 19,260 M 12,125 M 18,392 13,935 m 3,040 0 7,350 c 7,650 19,330 12,860 4 19,580 00 44,650 24,160 37,220 15,270 28,427 37,756 10,235 52,1242 11,600 34,992 2,494 R 5940 - 20,981 530 2,068 23,825 Carolina, MS ................. Cracraft, AR ............... Worthington, MS-AR ......... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ................ American Cutoff, MS-AR ..... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ...... Vancluse, AR .............. Island 84, AR, MS ........... Warfield Point, MS ......... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .... Spanish Moss, AR ............ Tarpley Island, MS .......... Miller Bend, MS ............ Island 82, AR ............... Ashbrook Island, MS ........ Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR ............... Huntington Point, MS ........ Pair O'Dice, AR ........... Eutaw-Mounds, MS ........ Cypress Bend, AR .......... Catfish Point, MS ........... Ozark, AR-MS ............... Prentiss, AR-MS ............. Rosedale Bend, AR ........... Riverton, MS ................ Klondike, AR ............... Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS ... Big Island, AR ............. Smith Point, MS ............. Dennis, MS .................. Cessions, MS ............... Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ............ Opposite Warnicott Ldg, MS Natchez Island, LA-MS ....... Waterproof Bar, LA .......... Spithead Towhead, MS ....... Browns Field, LA .......... Cottage Bend, LA-MS ....... Bondurant Towhead, LA ...... Coffee Point, LA ........... Yucatan, MS ............... Togo Island, LA .............. Below Racetrack, MS ......... Racetrack Towhead, MS ...... Marshall Cutoff, LA .......... Forest Home Towhead, LA .... Willow Cutoff, LA ............ Arcadia Point, MS ........... Point Lookout, LA .......... 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 598 601 611 615 L R R LLRRLLLRRLRR RLRL RL RLLLRLRLLL 20,440 (3.87 Miles) 330 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 448 449 462 470 478 LLRRLRLRRRLL R RL RL R 115 46,454 1,440 - 1,294 11,080 22,210 8,350 45,653 2,980 33,685 4,300 13,475 4,320 14,150 4,580 2,000 29,360 3,080 3,455 40,560 10,045 9,095 40,188 26,585 20,075 22,015 20,315 4,820 12,500 23,400 29,245 16,515 18,185 25,195 10,910 4,182 9,900 13,705 28,901 0 1,329,120 (251.73 Miles) (3) 4,306 5,351 7,695 11,372 3,6614 4,8354 14,049 4,421 3,260 9,010 8,256 14,7294 1,752 5,1664 4,5744 4,2754 12,4854 2,751 2,960 7,075 - TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction Constrerative Nonop- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Dikes: Ajax Bar, MS ............... Ben Lomond, MS .......... Balshed Ldg., MS ........... Wilson Point, LA ........... Corregidor, MS ............... Carolina, AR ................. Cracraft Lower, AR .......... Cracraft, AR ................ Leota, MS .................... Island, 86, AR .............. Seven Oaks, AR ............ Walnut Point, MS ............ Refuge, MS ................ Island 84, AR ................ Leland Bar, AR-MS .......... Leland Neck, AR-MS ....... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR ....... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-M S ................... Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS .................... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ....... Chicot Ldg., AR .............. Catfish Point, MS ........... Below Prentiss, MS ........... Malone Field, AR ............ Terrene, MS ................. White River Landing, AR ..... Montgomery Towhead, AR .... Victoria Bend, AR .......... Smith Point, MS .............. Island 70, MS ................ Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ........ 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 528 532 538 540 540 544 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 600 608 LLL RLLR RL R R LLLRL R 740 O 24,319 24,6674 8,238 3,592 6,730 2,897 9,614 3,809 7,571 6,592 5,754 O 4,725 5,278 4,580 16,668 4,315 Z 10,318 13,646 13,015 8,728 17,451 5,290 7,813 7,549 - 7,921 2,201 6,071 5,0334 7,617 14,949 R&L L&R LRL R RL R RRLL 10,775 (2.04 Miles) 388,899 (73.66 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER5 Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, AR ............ 31 Como, AR .................. 34 Morgan Bend, AR ............ 36 Yancopin, AR ................ 24 Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ........... Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR .......... 30 Morgan Bend, AR ............. 36 Fletcher Bend, AR ............ 39 Total dikes, Arkansas River.... RED RIVER6 Standard revetment:8 Dupre, LA .................. 69 Bringol, LA ................. 73 Egg Bend, LA ................ 75 Cologne Bend, LA ............ 77 Roxana, LA ................ 83 Ryland, LA .............. 88 Whittington, LA .............. 89 Smith, LA ................... 91 Latanier, LA ................ 93 Hudson, LA ................ 99 Robert, LA .................. 102 Alexandria Front, LA ......... 105 Callahan, LA ................ 110 Cotton, LA ................. 116 Rapides, LA ............... 119 Boyce, LA ............. .... 125 Total standard revetment, Red River ............... Dikes: Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA ...... 71 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ..... 73 Egg Bend, LA ............... 75 Cologne Bend, LA ............ 77 Echo, LA .................. 78 Richardson, LA .............. 79 RL R RRRRRR R R RRRRRRRR - - - 1,848 i - - - - - - 3,658 - - - - - - - 2,187 r 7,693 (1.46 Miles) - - - - - - - 2,690 - - - - - - - 4,000 0 -- - - - - - 2,400 - - - - - - - 650 - - - - - - - 3,325 - - - - - - - - 3,925 m - - - - - - - 2,900 8 - - - - - - - 2,700 z - - - - - - - 2,460 - - - - - - - 1,458 - - - - - - - 5,500 - - - - - - - 5,280 -- - - - - - 4,000 - - - - - - - 14,700 - - - - - - - 1,030 - - - - - - - 4,548 - - - - - - - 61,566 (11.66 Miles) RRRRRR 2,000 2,477 900 1,850 1,900 2,700 L RL R 11,770 11,720 5,250 2,800 31,540 (5.97 Miles) TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) RED RIVER' continued Dikes': Alexandria, LA .............. 105 R - - - - - - (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA................ 122 R - - - - - - 7,630 Total dikes, Red River ....... - - - - - 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 6. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 7. Includes all types of dikes and retards. TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR .............. 598 R - - - - - - - 3,905 Scrubgrass Bend, AR ......... 600 R - - - - - - 7,315 Henrico, AR................. 606 R - - - - - - - 25,040 Cessions Towhead, AR ........ 615 L - - - - - 2,683 - 10,615 Knowlton, AR................ 620 R - - - - - - - 16,900 Island 67, MS ............... 621 L - - - - - - - 7,625 Island 68 Bar, AR ............ 622 R - - - - - - - 6,445 Ludlow, AR ................. 626 R - - - - - - - 10,390 Rescue Landing, AR-MS ...... 629 L - - - - - - - 27,020 Fair Landing, AR ............ 632 R 25,690 Burke Landing, MS ........... 637 L - - - - - 4,701 - 19,070 Island 62, AR ............... 638 R - - - - - - - 9,030 Island 63, MS ............... 639 L - - - - - - - 11,454 Island 63 Bar, MS ............ 639 L - - - - - - - 3,795 Oldtown Bend, AR ............ 644 R - - - - - 4,985 - 26,860 Horseshoe, MS............... 647 L - - - - - - - 16,385 Westover, AR................ 650 R - - - - - - - 12,730 Delta-Friars Point, MS ........ 655 L - - - - - 2,550 - 30,090 Helena, AR .................. 660 R - - - - - 1,417 - 36,460 Trotters Landing, MS ......... 665 L - - - - - - - 32,905 Flower Lake, MS ............. 667 L - - - - - - - 16,385 St. Francis, AR............... 672 R - - - - - - - 24,663 Harbert Point, MS ............ 675 L - - - - - - - 9,065 Walnut Bend, AR ............ 680 R - - - - - - - 27,220 Mhoon Bend, MS ............ 685 L - - - - - 10,826 - 35,828 Peters, AR ................. 692 R - - - - - - - 23,675 Commerce, MS .............. 695 L 5,3608 - - - - - - 23,575 Porter Lake, AR ... :.......... 700 R - - - - - - - 34,155 Pickett, MS-AR .............. 703 R - - - - - - - 12,575 Norfolk-Star, MS ............ 709 L - - - - - - - 35,582 Cow Island Bend, AR ......... 714 R - - - - - - - 22,274 Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN ..................... 716 R - - - - - - 6,853 Coahoma, TN ............... 717 L 9,270 Ensley, TN ................. 723 L 41,766 Dismal Point, AR ............ 724 R - - - - - - - 7,200 Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... 730 R - - - - - 8,195 - 24,530 Presidents Island, TN ......... 733 L 12,755 Hopefield Point, AR, TN ....... 736 R - - - - - - - 5,390 Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .... 737 L - - - - - - - 31,293 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ......... 740 R - - - - - - - 2,070 St. Clair, AR ................. 742 R - - - - - - - 2,9302 Island 40, TN-AR ............ 744 R - - - - - - - 30,750 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction Constrerative Nonop- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: Brandywine, AR-TN ......... Shelby Forest, TN ......... Dean Island, AR .............. Cedar Point-Densford, TN ..... Chute of Island 35, TN ........ Lookout Bar, TN .......... Lookout, TN ................ Sunrise Towhead, TN ......... Lower Bullerton, AR .......... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ............. Osceola, AR................ Osceola, AR .................. Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ...... Kate Aubrey, TN ............ Island 26, TN .............. Bend of Island 25, TN ......... Barfield, AR ................. Obion-Tamm, TN ............ Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN .... Heloise, TN ................ Island 18, MO ................ Linwood Bend, TN ......... Blaker Towhead, TN ....... Bells Point, MO .............. Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .... Island 15, TN ............. Hathaway Landing, TN ....... Robinson Bayou, MO .......... Fritz Landing, TN ........... Lee Towhead, MO ............ Bend of Island 14, TN ......... Above Lee Towhead, TN ....... Little Cypress, MO .... .... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .... Linda, MO .......... ......... Below Toney's Towhead, TN ... Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ..... New Madrid Bend, MO ........ Kentucky Point, KY .......... New Madrid Bar, KY ......... 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 869 876 879 882 886 887 888 RL RLRRRRR RRRLRRLRLRLRLL RR LLRLLL L RL RLL RL R (7) (7) 7,900 20,859 3,430 1,450(9) 1,821 7,382 18,010 9,550 7,555 20,190 29,190 2,9902 5,005 14,615 28,350 (7) 30,808 - 1,3503 - 5,823 44,232 (7) 2,500 - 15,690 - 30,630 - 46,070 - 51,321 - 26,984 - 12,935 - 22,170 - 14,850 - 17,087 - 5,420 - 25,600 - 3,630 - 1,000 - 22,630 - 15,670 - 8,470 - 12,050 - 4,943 - 34,090 - 41,058 - 11,950 - 20,895 - 3,430 - 30,348 - 7,960 16,825 0 0 0 C2 O y x n x 0 MW W New Madrid, MO ............. La Forge, MO .............. Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY .................... Winchester Towhead, MO ..... Island 9, KY-TN ........... Milton Bell, MO ............ Chute of Island 8, KY ......... Bend of Island 8, MO ........ Island 8, KY ............... Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ....... Beckwith Bend, MO .......... Williams, KY ............... Wolf Island, KY ............. Columbus, KY .............. Belmont, MO ................. Island 3 and 4, KY ......... Campbell, KY ............... Pritchard, MO.............. Mayfield Creek, KY ........... Wickliffe, KY ........ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) ... Total revetment, Memphis District Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Henrico, AR ................. Below Knowlton, AR ........ Island 67, MS ............... Below Ludlow, AR .......... Sunflower, AR .............. Island 64, AR ................ Island 62, AR ............... Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Island 63, MS ............... Kangaroo Point, AR .......... Friars Point, MS ............. Montezuma Bar, MS ........ Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR ............ Flower Lake, MS ............ St. Francis Towhead, MS ...... Below Walnut Bend, AR ....... Bordeaux Point, MS ......... Peters, AR ................... Commerce, MS .............. Basket Bar, AR ............. Buck Island, MS ............. Porter Lake, AR ........... Pickett, MS ................. Seyppel, AR .................. Cat Island, AR .............. Coahoma, TN ............... Armstrong, AR-TN ........... 889 892 899 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 958 RR LRLRLRRLRL RL RRLRLLR 4,580 -_ (7) (7) 22,720 (4.30 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 681 693 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 RRL RL RRLL RLL RRLL RL RL RL RL RRL R 28,241 5,559 20,680 37,5207 5,540 33,5854 14,375 12,620 9,800 13,175 43,359 14,588 10,015 19,205 3,825 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 8,935 8,455 26,152 37,178 (5) 400 - (7) (7) 1,000 - - - - - - - 6,98010 7,830 1,350 350 700 200 440 1,838,545 (348.21 Miles) (6) 6,310 10,233 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 12,430 3,450 10,391 11,060 3,380 6,420 4,920 7,830 5,700 5,060 4,705 17,480 7,180 12,250 15,590 4,640 18,690 TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Operations This FY Construction eNroantiovpe- Otpiveera Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Dikes: Dismal Point, AR............. 724 R 25,510 Hopefield Point, AR .......... 736 R 1,330 Robinson Crusoe, TN .......... 738 R 21,9391 Loosahatchie Bar, TN ......... 739 R - - - - - - - 3,950 Above Loosahatchie, TN ....... 742 L - - - - - - - 8,990 Redman Point, AR ............ 743 R - - - - - - - 7,750 Randolph Point, TN ......... 747 L - - - 910 - - - 16,740 Poker Point, AR .............. 748 R - - - 550 - - - 8,050 Corona Bar, TN-AR ......... 755 R 8,430 Densford, TN .............. 757 L - - - 500 - - - 7,780 Cedar Point, TN .............. 759 L 2,890 Below Richardson Landing, TN ........ ....... 767 L - - - - - - - 5,950 Lookout, TN-AR ........... 771 R - - - - - - - 5,538 Plum Point, TN .............. 784 L 1,785 - - - - - - 9,695 Lake Neark, AR ............ 786 R - - - - - - - 2,5459 Kate Aubrey, TN ........... 791 R - - - - - - - 11,270 Keyes Point, TN .............. 791 L 19,775 Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ...... 795 R 17,330 Forked Deer, TN ............. 798 L 8,550 Island 25, AR .............. 804 R - - - - - - - 5,450 Nebraska Point, TN ......... 808 L - - - - - - - 12,149 Below Tamm Bend, TN ....... 813 L - - - - - - -8,300 Wrights Point, AR ............ 820 R 2,130 - - - - - 32,635 Island 21, Chute, TN .......... 824 L - - - - - - 3,170 Head of Island 21, TN ......... 828 L - - - - - - - 5,460 Island 20, MO-TN ........... 831 R - - - 4,600 - - - 18,139 Island 18, TN .............. 837 L - - - - - - 8,670 Tennemo, TN................ 842 L - - - 800 - - - 4,390 Blaker Towhead, TN .......... 843 L - - - 4,000 - - - 4,070 Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ................ 844 R - - - - - - - 25,877 Sandy Hook, TN .............. 850 R 2,350 Island 15, TN................ 851 L - - - - - -7,510 Robinson Bayou, MO ........ 853 R - - - 6,550 - - - 9,890 Hathaway, TN............... 854 L - - - 500 - - - 26,750 Island 15 Neck, TN ........... 854 L - - - - - - - 21,100 Above Lee Towhead, TN ....... 859 L - - - - - - - 1,300 Below Cherokee, TN .......... 866 L - - - - - - - 6,230 Stewart Towhead, MO ........ 871 R - - - - - - - 18,290 Ruddles Point, MO ........... 874 R - - - 900 - - - 8,130 Island 11, MO ................ Kentucky Point, KY .......... Morrison Towhead, MO ....... Hotchkiss Bend, MO .......... Below Island 9, TN ........... Donaldson Point, MO ........ Island 9, KY ............... Moore Island, KY-MO ........ Above Williams, KY .......... Campbell, KY................ Pritchard, MO............... Island 1, KY ................. Total dikes, Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... 882 887 890 895 901 905 906 929 930 942 944 948 RLRRLRLRLLRL 700 (7 ) (7) 4,039 11,550 1,070 6,583 18,859 8,320 7,0106 4,685 1,1508 2,610 9,390 15.260 - 180 500 11,745 (22.2 Miles) 6,980 25,130 - 748,347 (141.73 Miles) 1. Gross squares-articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Lumber mattress revetment 3. Rock groins. 4. Stone in pile dike. 5. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 6. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 7. Changed to correct previous errors. 8. No ACM, riprap paving only, unattached trench fill. 9. No ACM, riprap paving only. 10. Raised the height of the dike. H Ct2 c C, 0 C,, Cn O 0z TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roadson Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Corn- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Fifth Louisiana Levee District .......... Levees ............................ Floodwalls ..... ............... Old River structures and levees ....... Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ...... . Levees ........................... Floodwalls ..... ............... Morganza structure and levee ...... Morganza forebay levee .............. Port Allen lock ..................... Lafourche Basin Levee District ......... Levees ............................. Plaquemines West Levee District ....... Levees ..... ....................... Floodwalls ..................... Buras Levee District ................... Levees ............................. Floodwalls ...................... Empire lock ....................... Baton Rouge front levees ........... .... Pontchartrain Levee District ........... Levees .............................. Floodwalls ...................... Bonnet Carre guide levees ......... Bonnet Carre forebay levee ........ Bonnet Carre structure .............. East Jefferson Levee District ........... Levees ........................... Floodwalls .................... West Jefferson Levee District ........... Levees ... ....................... Floodwalls .......................... Harvey Canal Lock ............... Orleans Levee District ................. Left descending, east bank Levees ........................... Floodwalls .......................... IHNC lock .................... (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 (61.7) 61.7 (37.9) 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 (2.1) (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (11.6) 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 (27.2) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 (61.7) 61.7 (37.9) 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 (2.1) (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 (11.6) 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 (27.2) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) - (-) (-) (5.0) 5.0 (0.1) 0.1 (1.8) 1.6 (10.7) 9.4 1.3 (85.4) 77.8 0.8 6.7 0.1 (24.1) 24.1 (28.5) 28.5 (19.7) 19.7 (0.9) (91.1) 77.0 11.3 1.3 1.5 (10.8) 10.8 (4.6) 4.4 0.1 0.1 (19.5) (-) (5.3) 5.3 (0.1) 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (4.7) 4.7 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (1.1) 1.1 (-) - (0.1) 0.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) 0.6 6.8 0.1 (15.5) 15.5 (118.7) 118.7 (61.7) 61.7 (37.9) 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 (11.6) 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 (18.4) - 4.6 (-) (15.5) - 15.5 (-) (118.7) - 118.7 (-) (61.7) - 61.7 (-) (37.9) - 37.9 (-) (34.0) - 34.0 (-) (2.1) (-) (110.8) - 110.8 (-) (11.6) - 11.6 (-) (19.9) - 19.8 - 0.1 (-) (18.4) - 4.6 Right descending, west bank Levees .............................. Floodwalls .................... Algiers Canal lock ................. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District ....... Levees ........................... Floodwalls ...................... Grand Prairie Levee District ........... Levees ........................... Floodwalls ..... ............... Total Mississippi River ........... ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ................ East bank Atchafalaya River ....... Bayou des Glaises .................... West bank Atchafalaya River ......... Simmesport Ring .................. Melville Ring .................. Krotz Springs Ring ................ Mansura Hills to Hamburg .......... West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet ....... Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal ..... Morganza upper guide levee ............ East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee .... .............. Total Atchafalaya Basin and Floodway ................... Total-Main Stem System ...... LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, LA ............... Item A levees ........................ Item B levees ........................ Item C levees ........................ Total ........................... C? 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 511.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 13.8 0.1 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 511.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (128.7) (128.7) (56.5) (56.5) (8.9) (8.9) (106.7) (106.7) 0.2 (-) (0.5) 0.5 7.4 (-) 11.9 0.1 (11.5) 11.5 (19.7) 19.7 326.5 (143.9) 52.5 7.9 55.6 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (2.3) (69.6) (-) (-) (9.6) (8.9) (8.0) (48.8) (-) - (-) 10.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) - (-) (-) 1.2 (-) - - (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) - 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 479.6 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 (-) (-) (-) 13.8 (11.6) 11.6 (37.4) 37.4 479.6 (43.9) 20.2 12.0 - 1.ti - - - 4.1 - - - 1.7 - - - 20.5 - 11.7 (-) (127.7) (2.3) (68.6) y (-) (56.5) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) (-) (8.9) C (-) (105.0) (8.0) (47.2) 449.2 449.2 10.3 280.8 - - - 446.5 10.3 168.6 960.8 960.8 17.7 607.3 10.1 1.2 926.1 10.3 648.2 (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 - - - 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 D CI) CI) zz 1. Figures indicate !andside seepage berms only. - TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In Com- In Com- In Total System System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Comrn- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY2 pleted3 FY4 FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER East bank in Mississippi .............. 178.35 178.3 - 109.1 158.9 6.8 114.9 168.4 - 168.4 Greenville Harbor dikes ................ 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 - - - - West bank in Arkansas ................ 75.6 75.6 2.4 47.6 51.7 12.9 49.3 75.4 - 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .................. .. 198.7 198.7 - 67.1 88.7 2.1 69.4 197.8 197.8 Total Mississippi River ............. 460.4 460.4 2.4 231.6 299.3 11.8 233.6 442.5 - 442.5 YAZOO RIVER BASIN Headwater .......................... 624.76 305.6 6.1 136.7 - - - 620.7 (-) 281.5 Backwater .......................... 96.6 44.6 - 0.0 - - - 96.6 39.0 Total Yazoo River Basin ............ 721.3 350.2 6.1 136.7 - - - 717.3 (-) 320.5 ARKANSAS RIVER, ARKANSAS North bank .......................... 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 South bank .......................... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Arkansas River .............. 146.9 141.6 - 141.6 33.0 - 33.0 131.5 - 128.5 RED RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Total Red River backwater ......... 263.6 157.7 - 138.78 - - - 249.0 - 141.9 LOWER RED RIVER- SOUTH BANK RED RIVER Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees .................... (59.2) (59.2) (.1) (59.2) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (-) (33.6) Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees ........ 59.2 59.2 .1 59.29 - - - 59.2 33.6 Floodwalls.........................- - - - - - - Total Lower Red River ............. 59.2 59.2 - 59.2 - - - 59.2 33.6 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 5. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 6. Includes 36.9 miles of local protection works; 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel; 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects; 156.1 miles along main stem; and 160.4 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Reflects results of 1985 flowline reanalysis. TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSection In Com- In Com- In Total System System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER Mounds, IL ............................ Mound City, IL ........................ Cairo Drainage District ............ City of Cairo ........................... Little River Drainage District .......... Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO ................... Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ............... St. Johns Leveee and Drainage District ................... St. Francis Levee District of MO ........ City of Hickman, KY ................. Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton County, KY ................... Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ................. Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN ......................... Lake County Levee and Drainage District ................... Dyer County Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ............... Tipton-Obion levee extension ........... St. Francis Levee District of AR ......... Helena Improvement District No. 1 ...... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ......... Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ................ Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Desha County, AR ................... Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, AR ........... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District .............................. Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY ....................... 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 13.8 13.8 26.0 26.0 59.0 58.7 55.7 55.7 1.4 1.4 16.7 16.7 4.5 4.5 5.2 5.2 15.9 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 0.5 2.5 4.6 4.4 4.9 4.2 12.9 .0 .5 .1 1.7 0.9 3.3 4.9 4.9 26.0 - 46.9 12.0 55.1 - 0.5 58.2 43.0 55.7 23.0 1.4 - 16.74 15.5 4.54 5.2 4 15.9 21.3 153.24 5.3 23.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 20.5 18.1 18.1 6.6 6.6 93.6 93.6 20.5 0.6 9.1 1.3 94.6 2.4 18.8 11.5 18.14 12.9 6.64 93.6 87.3 11.4 0.3 4.5 5.2 4.5 15.9 0.4 80.3 2.4 18.8 11.5 9.2 16.5 87.3 4.4 4.4 - 4.44 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 16.3 3.6 1.1 8.5 3.5 19.3 13.8 26.0 46.1 55.1 - C 16.3 C 4.3 5.2 15.9 21.3 156.7 4.2 23.9 20.5 16.5 93.6 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 20.5 93.6 4.4 -4.4 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In Com- In Com- In Total System System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVER-continued Birds Point-New Madrid setbacklevee ......................... 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 35.3 - - 35.3 - 35.3 Total Mississippi River ............. 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 389.3 3.4 251.0 604.1 - 595.1 ST. FRANCIS RIVER East bank ............................. 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 - 81.7 West bank ........................... 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Total St. Francis River ............. 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 LITTLE RIVER East bank (left) ....................... 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 - - - 40.7 - 13.1 West bank ................. ......... 35.1 35.1 -35. 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute ............................. 39.9 39.9 - 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ........... 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Total Little River .................. 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 LOWER WHITE RIVER White River backwater levee ........... 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon .................. 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee ....................... 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 - - - - Total Lower White River ........... 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 MEMPHIS HARBOR Memphis Harbor ...................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 10.5 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Shown complete. Authority MSRC-ED-TL (MD 19 Mar. 80) 1st Ind. 21 Apr. 80. TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In Com- In Com- In Total System System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Comrn- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MISSISSIPPI RIVERMAIN STEM New Orleans District, Table 42-K ....... 511.6 511.6 7.4 326.5 10.1 (-) 1.2 479.6 - 479.6 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L .......... 460.4 460.4 2.4 231.6 299.3 11.8 231.3 442.5 - 442.5 MemphisDistrict, Table 42-M .......... 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 389.3 5.9 251.0 604.1 - 595.1 Subtotal-Main Stem ............... 1,608.3 1,601.5 9.8 1,183.6 698.7 17.7 483.5 1,526.2 - 1,517.2 TRIBUTARIES (OFF MAIN STEM) INCLUDED IN MR&T SYSTEM Atchafalaya Basin Floodway--NOD .................... 449.2 449.2 10.3 280.8 - - - 446.5 10.3 168.6 Lower Red River- South Bank-VXD .................. 59.2 59.2 .1 59.2 - - - 59.2 - 33.6 Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD...... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Subtotal-Tribs. in MR&T System .... 593.8 593.8 10.4 425.4 24.7 - 24.7 589.8 10.3 283.3 Total in MR&T System ............. 2,202.1 2,195.3 20.2 1,609.0 723.4 17.7 510.5 2,116.0 10.3 1,800.5 OTHER TRIBUTARIES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,-NOD ........ 17.4 17.4 - 17.417.4 - 17.4 Yazoo River Basin-VXD .............. 721.3 356.5 6.1 136.7 - - - 717.3 - 320.5 Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD....... 61.5 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 Red River Backwater-VXD ........... 263.6 157.7 - 138.7 - - - 249.0 - 141.9 St. Francis River-MD ................ 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 - 120.5 Little River-MD ...................... 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 Lower White River-MD ............... 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 Memphis Harbor-MD ................ 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 Subtotal-Other Tribs. in MR&T Project .................... 1,608.2 1,117.2 6.1 814.3 15.3 - 9.8 1,559.5 - 800.7 Grand Total in Project ............. 3,810.3 3,312.5 26.3 2,485.6 738.7 17.7 520.3 3,675.5 10.3 2,601.2 Cl) C12 C,, 0 zO7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Location Year Initiated In System When Completed Built This FY (Miles) Total Complete Thru This FY Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ................. 1938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie ............... 1946 92.6 - 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ........... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet .................................. 1938 15.7 - 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ...................... 1933 244.2 - 186.4 76 Morganza Floodway ............... ............... 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ........................ 1956 8.3 - 8.3 100 Old River inflow channel .......................... 1960 2.3 1.9 2.3 100 Old River lock approach channels ................. 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ............... 1958 2.5 - 2.5 100 Eastern Rapides-S.C. Avoyelles ..................... - 83.5 - - - Teche-Vermillion Water Supply .................... - 6.3 - 6.3 100 42-50 Percent Complete MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Corn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River .............. ............... 1947 199.1 - 199.1 100 Quiver River ..................................... 1947 69.6 - 69.6 100 Deer Creek ............................ ...... .... 1947 7.0 - 7.0 100 Steele Bayou ...................................... 1947 54.9 - 54.9 100 Steele Bayou' ................ .... ............... 1965 71.2 - 63.0 70 Main Canal ............... ....................... 1959 21.1 - 21.1 100 M ain Canal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 22.2 - - Black Bayou ..................................... - 36.5 - - Big Sunflower River tributaries ................... 1957 227.2 - 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries ........................... 1960 35.4 - 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ................................. 1960 39.9 - 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project .............................. 1976 179.0 1.6 54.1 30 Coldwater River .................................. 1941 54.6 - 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal ............................... 1948 0.4 - 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal ................................ 1940 74.8 - 73.5 85 little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway .................... 1939 48.0 - 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ....................... 1971 2.9 - 2.9 100 Yacona River ..................................... 1952 1.8 - 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou ....................................... 1944 16.1 - 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou .................................... 1934 69.0 - 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 26.0 - - Bear Creek Diversion ....................... .......... - 4.8 - - Lake Cormorant ................................. . - 20.9 - - Hurricane Bayou ................................. - 2.5 - - Opossum Bayou ..................... ............ - 20.8 - - Abaica Creek ................................... - 7.7 - - Chicopa Creek ................................. - 7.0 - - Bear Creek ....................................... - 23.3 - - Rocky Bayou ......... .... ..... ... ............... - 7.8 - - Whiteoak Bayou ................................. - 55.9 - - Miscellaneous ditches ........................... .. - 12.3 - - Yalobusha River .................................. 1939 46.0 - 46.0 100 Yazoo River ...................................... 1940 160.2 - 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Channel .................... 1956 30.8 - 30.8 100 Tchula Lake ................................... 1964 26.4 - 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou ............................ 1957 40.4 - 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou ................................. 1960 3.5 - 3.5 100 Hillside Floodway .............................. 1964 11.0 - 11.0 100 Yazoo City protection works ...................... 1953 1.6 - 1.6 100 Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ......................... 1975 30.2 - 15.1 50 Alligator-Catfish Bayou ........................... 1973 8.3 - 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek ................................. 1975 6.4 - 2.9 25 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ............ ... ........... 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche4 ,7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ........................... 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 42-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1986) Location BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR- continued Big & Colewa Creeks 5,7 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .... Tensas River ..................................... Tensas River 6 ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boeuf River, AR and LA .......................... Fleschmans Bayou, AR ............................ Caney Bayou, AR ............. ............. Canal 18, AR .................................... Big Bayou, AR ................................... Black Pond Slough, AR ........................... Bayou Macon, AR and LA Rush Bayou, AR ................................. Canal 19, AR .................................... Canal 43, AR .................................... Canal 81, AR .................................... Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal ........................... Kirsch Lake Canal ................................ Canal 19 Extension ............................... Lake Chicot Pumping Plant .................... RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ............ .... Six Mile Bayou, LA ............................ GRAND PRAIRIE, AR .......................... BAYOU METO, AR ............................. 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 42-52 Year Initiated In System When Completed Built This FY (Miles) Total Complete Thru This FY 1965 1947 1968 1953 1963 1964 1963 1952 1962 1959 1964 1957 1956 1957 1964 1976 51.5 96.5 61.0 103.9 6.6 7.4 10.3 33.3 14.3 150.8 6.7 50.2 34.5 32.7 9.4 2.5 86.8 96.5 165.0 103.9 6.6 7.4 10.3 33.3 14.3 150.8 6.7 50.2 34.5 32.7 14.8 9.3 9.4 2.5 6.9 1.5 338.1 164.9 Percent Complete 60 100 37 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 94 100 6.5 1.5 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1986) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ........... 1952 9.6 - 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO. ........................ 1963 291.3 7.3 247.0 85 St. Francis River, MO and AR ..................... 1953 602.7 7.0 378.0 63 West Memphis Drainage, AR ..................... 1951 19.8 - 19.8 100 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR .................... 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, AR ............................. 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, AR ............................. (1) 112.0 - - LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ......................... 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, AR ...................... (1) 103.8 - - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ................................ (1) 41.7 WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ................... 1952 34.3 - 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) ................................. (1) 9.3 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ....................................... 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ...................... 1955 19.7 - 19.7 100 MS River Below Cape Girardeau; West TN tributaries. (1948 Act) ...................... 1961 225.0 5.0 89.8 40 Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-53 TABLE 42-R REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design St. Francis Basin-WappapelloLake Subtotal Memphis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin Lower White River Cache Basin, Ark. Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-KY Mud Lake, TN Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Lower Red River-South Bank Red River Levee Dam Safety Assurances 6,525,196 9,288,482 14,834 12,035,502 2,746,236 100,003 35,308 7,043 423,426 31,176,030 7,258,721 9,608,172 19,878,153 12,789,569 60,287 44,699 10,034 3,368,034 3,368,034 2,826,774 4,380,119 340,007 23,081,609 660,782 108,731 31,398,022 852,303 537,605 2,548,627 16,737,727 12,898,743 200,836 136,716 119,718 -- 2,711,043 -- _-- -- -- -- -- 2,711,043 1,508,761 Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System Channel improvement Teche-Vermilion Basin water supply Inspection of completed works Mapping Subtotal Total Federal Funds 49,649,635 34,032,275 1,508,761 -- -- 1,735,728 13,948,537 8,365,246 -- 34,408,774 5,413,810 -- 165,217 113,831 -- 26,560,637 8,599,948 -- 160,779 -- -- 40,462,157 11,265,100 -- 3,959 -- -- -- 203,502 -- -- 198,577 -- 115,710,060 34,160,014 1,735,728 196,535,725 102,958,345 5,999,532 42-54 TABLE 42-R (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Item Construction Maintenance Other CONTRIBUTED FUNDS New Orleans District: Old River -- 120,039 -- Atchafalaya Basin 20,758 -- -- Mississippi River Levees 331,991 6,756 -- Channel Improvement -- 12,826 Total Contributed Funds 352,749 139,621 -- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 196,888,474 103,097,966 5,955,532 42-55 TABLE 42-S REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1986 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1986 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carrb Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal Total completed works $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 169,352 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,030 17,384,030 699,185 699,185 -- 3,375,492 3,375,492 -- 14,212,198 14,212,198 -- 1,258,916 1,258,916 -- 1,112,967 1,112,967 -- 540,838 540,838 -- 2,701,566 2,701,566 -- 10,098,817 10,098,817 -- 35,992,117 35,992,117 -- 5,513,110 5,513,110 -- 387,917 387,917 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 42-56 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1986 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1986 UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg Distict: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, etc. Red River Backwater: Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 163,284,354 98,000 320,796,307 57,249,400 111,945,000 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 189,911,282 965,429 47,505,992 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 34,607,900 7,930,000 1,344,000 107,000 424,000 966,532,720 194,311,990 7,049,414 15,676,286 88,756,800 40,333,200 52,344,646 49,509,300 438,400 39,800,000 350,833,065 23,549,260 78,017,040 958,175 26,537,600 21,325,400 16,017,700 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 163,257,429 98,000 320,763,622 57,249,400 111,913,145 439,434 7,871,650 9,019,908 189,752,603 965,429 47,487,535 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 34,550,304 7,929,834 1,093,946 80,169 423,426 965,905,551 193,712,453 7,049,414 15,676,286 88,388,085 40,176,135 52,166,032 48,612,805 231,325 39,787,700 349,687,941 23,549,260 77,035,635 958,175 26,503,676 21,292,057 16,000,700 33,924 33,343 42-57 26,925 -- 32,685 31,855 -- 23,350 -- 158,679 -- 18,457 -- -- -- 57,596 166 250,054 26,831 574 627,169 599,537 368,715 157,065 178,613 896,495 207,075 12,300 1,145,124 981,405 TABLE 42-S (Continued) REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1986 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1986 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin-Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater (Except Muddy Bayou) Muddy Bayou Steambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Atachafalaya Basin: Atachafalaya Basin Floodway Atachafalaya River Navigation Atachafalaya Basin Floodway System Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal 45,375,900 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 35,075,300 30,405,000 50,4.40,006 63,234,310 612,484 24,082,200 64,067,200 5,145,200 14,767,000 12,877,000 387,000 1,376,926,110 33,806,000 4,918,008 35,945,266 529,183,117 18,056,600 200,680 206,936,000 529,552,537 303,463 270,000 281,068,000 1,640,239,671 45,354,193 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 34,012,070 27,891,401 49,174,440 62,225,154 612,484 23,434,559 60,905,768 5,145,200 14,767,000 7,323,412 10,034 1,356,699,627 33,806,000 4,898,700 35,945,266 528,712,999 18,056,600 200,680 206,689,374 528,916,184 303,463 160,778 280,906,441 1,638,596,485 21,707 -- -- 1,063,230 2,513,599 1,265,566 1,009,156 -- 647,641 3,161,432 -- 5,553,588 376,966 20,226,483 19,308 470,118 -- 246,626 636,353 109,222 161,559 1,643,186 3,986,175,942 3,963,679,105 22,496,838 150,000 150,000 -- 30,000 30,000 -- 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 364,339 -- 65,000 65,000 -- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 540,000 540,000 -- 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 42-58 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1986 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1986 New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region 69,753 69,753 -- Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes 965,247 965,247 -- Subtotal 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,156,077,142 4,133,580,304 22,496,838 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO 2,405,300 2,404,890 410 Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing 203,286 203,286 -- Subtotal 2,608,586 2,608,176 410 Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- Enid Lake 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- Arkabutla Lake 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- Grenada Lake 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- Subtotal 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- Total Eight-Year Program Funds 10,281,695 10,281,285 410 Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies 4,166,358,837 4,143,861,589 22,497,248 Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 1,587,427,855 1,584,352,178 3,075,677 Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 60,341,881 58,229,130 2,112,752 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 5,860,141,873 5,832,456,197 27,685,677 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1985 5,892,210,782 5,864,525,105 27,685,677 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been exluded from this report. 42-59 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-T STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1985 Engineer District Expenditures St. Louis $ 79,372,809 Memphis 257,043,764 Vicksburg 125,192,794 New Orleans 548,153,561 Total $1,009,762,928 42-60 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 Total Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep. 30, 1986 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Alloted 4,271,000 6,805,000 4,510,000 6,809,000 60,341,8812 (Regular Funds)1 Cost 4,583,214 5,722,645 5,499,308 5,955,532 58,229,129 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Alloted 289,370,000 199,330,000 216,083,000 194,438,000 3,986,175,942 Cost 204,211,601 265,108,622 224,369,411 196,535,725 3,963,679,105 Maintenance Alloted 109,548,000 94,345,000 102,554,000 100,480,000 1,637,806,406 Cost 90,732,587 111,777,503 104,920,222 102,958,345 1,424,890,280 Rehabilitations Alloted 137,000 -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost 18,385 -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Alloted -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 393,600 46,311 315,294 20,000 9,580,771 Cost 296,065 56,321 63,875 352,749 9,558,878 Maintenance Contributed 125,424 128,923 279,972 169,279 2,335,014 Cost 51,592 161,616 242,576 139,621 2,170,324 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1986): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: $4,155,657,370 Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: 10,281,695 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Impounded savings: 1,593,097 $4,197,471,837 Flood control emergencies: Net total alloted: 14,885,922 Impounded savings: 14,378 14,900,300 Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: 60,341,881 Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1986 1,587,427,855 1,647,769,736 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): 32,068,909 Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: 5,892,210,782 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1986 5,860,663,632 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1986: 5,892,210,782 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 82: $262,798,000; FY 83: $403,052,000; FY 84: $300,480,000; FY 85: $323,297,000; FY 86: $301,727,000. 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. 42-61 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 42-V MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 86 Categories ($) ($) SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res - 12026 173,345 Subtotal 173,345 Vicksburg District Boeuf-Tensas Basin, AR & LA - 81273 614,351 Larto Lake-Saline Lake, LA - 12065 288,745 Southwest Mississippi Tributaries Basin, MS - 12351 3,089 Yazoo River Basin, MS - 12074 354,557 Subtotal 1,260,742 Memphis District Bayou du Chien - 33008 239,283 Eastern AR Reg-Comprehensive Study - 81266 428,756 Helena & Vicinity- 12165 2,906 Mayfield Creek- 10850 54,437 Reelfoot Lake, TN -00086 299,593 St. Francis River Below Wappapello - 22000 306,220 Tiptonville, TN- 12246 189,968 West Memphis, AR- 12164 1,185 Subtotal 1,552,348 TOTAL (Category 110) 2,956,435 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District 167,264 MemphisDistrict 67,575 TOTAL (Category 120) 234,839 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTH STUDIES (Category 130) Flood Damage Prevention 132) Vicksburg District MS River East Bank Natchez - 76022 25,599 Memphis District Nonconnah Creek, TN (Phase I)- 77007 26 TOTAL (Category 130) 25,625 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (142) New Orleans District MS-LA Estuarine Area ADVCPE - 12193 964,516 Vicksburg District Bushley Bayou Area, LA- 75226 55,157 Memphis District St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy - 77005 378,753 Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS- 12417 302,653 TOTAL (Category 140) 681,406 1,701,079 42-62 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 86 Categories ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) New Orleans District Eastern Rapides & S.C. Avoyelles Parishes - 75031 124,960 Mississippi Delta Region - 23270 472,907 Subtotal 597,867 Memphis District Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY - 77009 5,403 L'Anguille River Basin - 00082 434,284 Subtotal 439,687 TOTAL (Category 160) 1,037,553 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 5,955,531 42-63 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Authority. Public Law 84-99, as amended, (Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies) provides authority for the Chief of Engineers to undertake disaster preparedness activities, flood fighting and rescue work, rehabilitation of flood control works damaged or destroyed by flood, protection or repair of Federally authorized shore protective works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, provision of emergency drinking water, and drought assistance. Activities. FY 1986 disaster preparedness activities included the review and update of existing emergency response plans; development of required new plans; training of response personnel exercises to test plans, personnel and training procurement and maintenance of critical supplies and requirements not readily available during initial response phase; maintenance and required upgrade of emergency operations centers; coordination with Federal, State and local response agencies and other public entities; and overall management of the preparedness program. The Corps responded to major flood problems on the Island of Puerto Rico in October 1985 and again in May 1986. In October, a tropical wave (became Tropical Storm Isabel) caused major flooding and extensive landslides. Deaths were estimated at 180 people, over 5,000 people were forced from their homes, and damage estimates reached $125 million. The Corps of Engineers responded by sending geotechnical people to assist in the search for survivors in landslide areas, in addition to damage assessment teams. During FY 86, the record high water levels in the Great Lakes continued to cause flood problems. The excess precipitation has continued averaging six percent above normal during the first seven months of the year. The Corps of Engineers have provided $7 million in temporary flood protective works and flood fighting assistance in those areas which were beyond State and local capabilities. Technical assistance and investigations continue. As the year progressed flooding throughout the United States was extensive. The Midwest from the Lower Great Lakes, across the Ohio River Valley and into the Mid-Atlantic states experienced severe flooding in November 1985 and May to June 1986. The Great Lakes Region was to be hit with flooding once more, in September 1986. In February 1986, it was the Coastal and Central Valley of California to Western Nevada to experience disastrous flooding. After suffering the effects of one of the severest droughts in the history of the South, heavy rains brought flooding to North and South Carolina in August 1986. The Corps provided technical assistance, flood fighting equipment and materials to Federal, State, and local entities. After the flood waters receded, the Corps undertook necessary investigations and appropriate rehabilitation of damaged flood control projects. In the South and East, the Corps responded to several hurricanes and tropical storms from October 1985 to August 1986. Four hurricanes struck the United States in FY 86, killing at least 21 people and doing more than $1,03 billion in damages. The Hurricane Juan system brought flooding through the South and East. Hurricane Kate hit Mexico Beach, Florida on November 21, 1985, and was downgraded to a tropical storm ten hours later but, not before it had left four dead, over $1 million in damages and caused the evacuation of 100,000 people in thirteen counties. On June 26, 1986, Hurricane Bonnie hit land between Galveston and Port Arthur, Texas with 85 mph winds. Four people died and damage was well in excess of $1 million. Hurricane Charlie traveled up the East Coast, crossing the Outer Banks, North Carolina on August 17, 1986 leaving six dead and over $1 million in damages. Corps assistance as a result of these major storms included flood fight assistance and rehabilitation activities under the Corps PL 84-99 emergency authority, and work in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under its PL 93-288 assistance authority. STATUS OF THE PL 84-99 EMERGENCY FUND Unallocated Balance as of 30 Sep 85 .... FY 1986 Appropriation .............. FY 1986 Supplement Appropriation ... FY 1986 Cut (Graham-Rudman) ....... Revocation FY 1986 ................. Total Funds Available ............... Allocations Disaster Preparedness ............ Emergency Operations ............ Rehabilitation..................... Advance Measures................ Hazard Mitigation . ............... Unallocated Balance as of 30 Sep 86 .... $ 24,559,307 25,000,000 25,000,000 (1,075,000) 6,432,035 $79,916,338 $ 9,642,999 3,850,932 20,212,874 4,611,413 20,868 $ 41,577,252 43-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ..................... 44-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) ........................... 44-2 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 44-2 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated by California Debris Commission and permits to operate Flood Control Page 4. Sacramento River, CA .................. 44-3 Tables Table 44-A Cost and Financial Table 44-B Statement .................... 44-5 Authorizing Legislation .................... 44-6 are issued to those who provide satisfactory debrisrestraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 44-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACWO5-4-79-527 was renewed for another 5 years and will be effective until February 28, 1989. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105- eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1986, amounts to $1,182,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1986, amounts to $1,573,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $644,522, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Englebright Dam at a fiscal year cost of $192,168. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debriscontrol structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATIONRESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required 44-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations included condition and operation studies by hired labor; and bank protection, Yuba River, various locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $40,926. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 44-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1986) cost for existing project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $169,600,000 of which $74,600,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non- Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Local interest costs from required contributed, funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Engineering continued. Project prevented an estimated $7,300,000,000 in damages from the February- March 1986 rainfloods. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses 44-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by.1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947,1948,1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough. (See table 44-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) 44-4 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 83 FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Sep 30, 1986 1. RHeygrualuatliiocn Mofining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) Contributed Funds, ther) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. SAcramento River, (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Costp New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. (ontrib. Cost Rehab. Contrib. ost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost M int. ontrib. ost 821,325 821,325 713,000 554,000 605,227 653,198 16,564 20,000 19,026 2,257 25,000 22,435 15,000 19,436 702,000 69 695,102 69 24,000 2 10,066 4 14,000 2 11,282 4 300,000 20 274,092 16 - 5,093,9991 2 - 5,093,9991 s 5,000 7,162,043' )0,522 7,109,9886 - 12,4206 - 12,4206 361,482 361,482 4,000 1,670,6567 4,177 1,663,0477 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 361,777 - 361,777 6,500 1,660,723 1,476 1,656,899 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 34,0008 - 34,0008 1,500 68,127,8359 5,245 68,065,6739 - 1,979,104 - 1,979,104 - 10,724,08510 - 10,724,0851o - 9,68611 - 9,68611 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations. 3. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 costs. 4. Includes $6,035,961 from regular funds and $1,126,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 5. Includes $5,983,906 from regular costs and $1,126,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 6. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 44-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 TABLE 44-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 and May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without 47th Cong., 1st sess.' injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit (Amendment of sec. 13, hydraulic mining without construction of impounding Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)' works, provided there is no injury to navighbility of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Additional levee construction and reconstruction, including H. Docs. 649, 78th Cong., levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and multipurpose 2d sess., and 367, 81st reservoirs.2 Cong., 1st sess. Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Sacramento River from Chico Landing toRed Bluff, and 2d sess. local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing.2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., River.2 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 19. 44-6 4. CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-C SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $65,899,204 $1,979,104 $67,878,308 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. $67,385,673 $1,979,104 $69,364,777 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $77,429,758 $1,988,790 $79,418,548 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 44-7 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COL Dwayne G. Lee, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. Dr. Robert W. Whalin, PE, is Technical Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of six technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, Environmental, Coastal Engineering Research Center, and Information Technology Laboratory. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, river and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and nonnuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental Laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Natural Resources Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. The Coastal Engineering Research Center conceives, plans, and conducts research and data collection in coastal/ocean engineering and nearshore oceanography to: provide a better understanding of waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents; provide scientific and engineering data and design criteria; and determine the effects of the coastal activities of the Corps of Engineers which are important to environmental considerations in the coastal zone. The Information Technology Laboratory was formed on 1 July 1986 by combining all information functions in one organization. This organization is cognizant of all communication, computer, graphic presentation, and printed media at the station. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state-of-the-art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest; operates DoD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, Soils Mechanics, and Coastal Engineering; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1986, 237 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 15 information reports, 35 information exchange bulletins, 9 video reports, 10 technical manuals, and 18 various special,'purpose technical documents (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices Were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1986 was $121,745,478 which included $34,988,000 performed by contract. Of the total program $58,515,442 was oriented toward the civil sector and $63,230,036 to military. The plant replacement and improvement program was $4,920,990 for this period. 45-1 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESSES (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearing house where engineers and port operators of the nations of the world exchange views and experiences on problems relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements. Its objective is broadly stated "to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation". In 1902, the United States began an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of Congresses of Navigation and for payment of the actual expenses of properly accredited national delegates of the United States to meetings of the Congresses and Commissions. As a member nation to the Association, the U.S. Section pays an annual subvention of about $6,900 to the International Secretariat in Brussels, Belgium. The objective of the Association - to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation - is met by holding International Congresses and publishing technical bulletins and other documents. The Congresses are held in various member countries, usually at four-year intervals. The Association is supported principally by member governments, but membership also extends to corporations and to individuals. Member governments are represented at the Congresses and at meetings of the Permanent International Commission by delegates, the number of official delegates to be determined by the amount of the annual subvention paid by the government, but not to exceed ten in number. Corporate members may send one official representative to the Congresses. Currently, the Permanent International Commission has 41 countries represented. Individual membership is of two classes - Annual and Life - depending on the method of payment of dues. There are 1,495 annual international members, 552 life members, and 692 corporate members, for a total of 2,739 members. Membership of the U.S. section on July 31, 1986, totaled 648, consisting of 106 life members, 442 individual members, and 100 corporate members. The affairs of the Association are managed by the Permanent International Commission composed of delegates from the supporting governments. The National Commission constitutes the governing body of the U.S. Section and the U.S. Members of the Permanent International Commission. The Director of Civil Works, Office of the Chief of Engineers, US Army, and the Commander and Director, Water Resources Support Center, are the ex-officio Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the National Commission. The Secretary handles all administrative matters of the U.S. Section. During Fiscal Year 1986, National Commissioners were: Major General Henry J. Hatch, Director of Civil Works, USACE, ex-officio Chairman; Colonel George R. Kleb, Commander and Director, Water Resources Support Center, ex-officio Secretary; Rear Admiral John Paul Jones, USN; Mr. John Pisani, MARAD; Mr. Jack E. Ravan, EPA; Mr. J. Ron Brinson, Port of New Orleans; Mr. John A. Downs, National Association of Dredging Contractors; Mr. James M. Goldston, Goldston Corporation; and Mr. Charles R. Roberts, Port of Oakland. One position on the U.S. Section National Commission was vacant. Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret) is an honorary Vice President of PIANC, having served two terms as a Vice President. Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), Secretary-General, XXth International Navigation Congress, 1961, is ex-officio member of the Permanent International Commission. The annual meeting of the Permanent International Commission (PIC) was hosted by the U.S. Section and was held in Portland, Oregon, on May 27, 1986, and was attended by all National Commissioners, except Mr. Brinson. The Honorable Robert K. Dawson, Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, welcomed the delegates to the meeting and to the United States. Mr. Harry N. Cook, Commissioner Emeritus, filled the vacant position on the Commission. Lieutenant General E. R. Heiberg III, Chief of Engineers and PIANC International Vice-President, and Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret) also attended the PIC meeting. American representatives attended meetings of the International Study Commissions, two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Working Groups of PTCs. U.S. representation on these groups during this fiscal year was as follows: International Commission for Study of Locks, Ship Lifts, and River Weirs - Dr. Michael Yachnis, USN. The Commission has published the portion of the study dealing with locks and continues working on the sections devoted to ship lifts. Dr. Yachnis replaces Mr. John Davis, who resigned after having served as the U.S. Representative to the Locks Commission for 13 years. Permanent Committee for Developing Countries - Major General Bates Burnell, USA (Ret) Permanent Technical Committee I - Major General Robert Seedlock, USA (Ret) Working Group 1, Economic Implications of Inland Waterways - Mr. Howard E. Olson Working Group 2, Disposal and Land Dumping of Dredged Materials: Impact on the Environment - Mr. Paul Sorensen Working Group 3, Consideration of Risk in Determining Bank Protection - Mr. Alan D. Crowhurst Working Group 4, Use of Geotextiles for Inland Waterways Bank Protection - Mr. Max Lamb Working Group 5, Container Transport with Inland Vessels - Mr. Morris A. Clyde Working Group 6, Problems Created by Salt Water Intrusion in Inland Navigation Canals and Rivers - Ms. Christina Correale 46-1 Working Group 7, Economic and Statutory Aspects of Management of Materials Dredged from Inland Waterways - Mr. Charles Hummer Permanent Technical Committee II - Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Working Group 1, Navigation in Muddy Areas - Dr. John Herbich Working Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters in Deeper Water - Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Working Group 3, Ice Navigation - Mr. C. Allen Workley Working Group 4, Handling of Dangerous Goods in Ports - Captain William R. Reidel Working Group 5, Underkeel Clearance, Hard Bottoms/ Sea Conditions - Mr. Ronald Uhlin Working Group 6, Classification of Soils and Rocks to be Dredged - Mr. James W. Bean Working Group 7, Dimensions and Lay-out of Chan- -nels, Including two-way Channels - Mr. Leonard Van Houten Working Group 8, Damage Inflicted by Ships With Bulbous Bows on Underwater Structures - Mr. Wesley Allen Working Group 9, Development of Modern Marine Terminals - Mr. Charles Roberts Working Group 10, Disposal of Dredged Materials Into the Sea - Colonel Herbert Haar, USA (Ret.) Working Group 11, Consequences of New Developments of Car/Passenger Ferries - U.S. not participating Working Group 12, The Performance and Design Parameters of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Mr. Robert Whalin Working Group 13, Floating Breakwaters - Mr. John Oliver Working Group 14, Economical Channel Maintenance Methods - Mr. James W. Bean Working Group 15, Graving Docks - Dr. Michael Yachnis Working Group 16, Specifications of Loading, Transportation and High Temperature Destruction of Toxic and Chemical Wastes at Sea - Mr. Patrick Tobin Working Group 17, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Maritime Structures in Salt Waters Exposed to Material Degradation Joint Subcommittee on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. John M. Nichol Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. Neil Ross Working Group 2, Waves in Yacht Harbors & Marinas - Mr. Orson Smith Working Group 3, Provision of Navigation Aids for Sport & Pleasure Craft - Mr. Austin E. Brant, Jr. Working Group 4, Chartering Services - Their Growth and Impact on Sport & Pleasure Navigation - Vacant Working Group 5, Standards for Construction, Equipment and Operation of Yacht Harbors and Marinas - Vacant U.S. Section regional meetings were held on 25-26 June 1986 in St. Louis, Missouri, by the Central Region and on 4-5 September 1986 in Seattle, Washington, by the Western Region. During 1986, the U.S. Section also held concurrent meetings and the PIANC exhibit was displayed at meetings with the Western Dredging Association, American Association of Port Authorities, National Waterways Conference. 46-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to that Act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on October 1, 1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Sec. 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on 5 September 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: 819 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, and structural safety, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC. Of the total 819 applications, 93 applications were specifically for hydropower development at the existing Corps projects. Recommendations were furnished to the Commission concerning the impact of hydroelectric power development on the existing and proposed Federal water resources projects. Recommendations also were provided to the Commission on the environmental impacts of constructing power plant(s) at either proposed or existing projects. To date, there are 34 constructed non-Federal power plants at Corps projects with a total capacity of 1227 MW. Non-Federal entities had 14 power plants under construction at Corps projects during the fiscal year, and had 35 licensed power plants in various design stages. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps in approving final design, plans and construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY 1986, the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $761,589. Review of license applications is funded by the Corps as a line item in the General Investigation Account. In FY 86, the cost for this pre-licensing activity was $639,585, which was reported to FERC for the Commission's assessment of annual charges to licensees. 47-1 REGULATORY, SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various waterrelated construction activities: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in an alteration of waterways, e.g. boat docks); Section 103 of the Marine Protection Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (ocean dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged and fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1986, the Corps received approximately 14,000 applications for permits and issued 7,800 permits and 2,500 letters of permission. In addition about 20,000 activities were authorized by regional or statewide permits which did not require individual applications from the public. Many thousands of other minor activities were authorized by the Corps' nationwide permits. In FY 1986 the Corps continued its efforts toward regulatory reform based on a May 7, 1982, directive from the President's Task Force on Regulatory Relief. By the end of FY 1985, actions to streamline the Corps' procedures had reduced average permit application processing time to 75 days compared with 119 days at the end of FY 1982. TABLE 48-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance--30 Sep 85 ....... $ 619,363 Allotments ........................... 56,708,570 Total Funds Available .................. 57,327,933 Obligations ........................... 56,687,534 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 86 ........ $ 613,501 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 85 .......... 2,309,338 Allotments .......................... 56,708,570 Total Funds Available .................. 59,017,908 Expenditures ......................... 57,261,152 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 86 ........ $ 1,756,756 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligations expenditures, see Table 48-B. 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 11490, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies to undertake national emergency planning and preparedness to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national security emergencies. Status: During FY 1985, the Corps of Engineers continued its efforts to improve its readiness posture and ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis was placed on the initiation of program activities that require a long-term commitment of resources. These activities included regional macroanalysis of mobilization requirements and resources; maintenance of, planning for and development of emergency facilities to support continuity of operations: and, planning to meet the nation's water resources requirements during a national emergency. In the latter case, Executive Order 11490 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the Executive Agency responsible for emergency water planning. Significant strides were made in the development of preparedness guidance and execution plans at all levels. While the efforts undertaken identified additional shortfalls or problems to be addressed, the Corps program continues to move towards the goal of ensuring a national engineering and construction capability that can respond to any national emergency. For fiscal year obligations and expenditures see Table 48-C. TABLE 48-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 85 ........ $ 5,398 Allotments ............... ............ 2,319,391 Total Funds Available ................. 2,324,789 Obligations ............................ 2,322,270 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 86 ........ $ 2,519 Expenditures Unexpended Balance--30 Sep 86 ............ 5,398 Allotments ............................ 2,319,391 Total Funds Available .................. 2,324,789 Expenditures..... ...... ........... 2,246,270 Unexpended Balance--30 Sep 86 ........ $ 78,519 48-1 TABLE 48-C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 85 ......... $ 1,083,339 Allotments ........................... 10,307,804 Total Funds Available ................... 11,391,143 Obligations ........................... 10,534,374 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 86 ......... $ 856,769 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 85 .......... 1,710,220 Allotments ........................... 10,307,804 Total Funds Available .............. .. 12,018,024 Expenditures ........................ 10,404,139 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 86 ......... $ 1,613,885 48-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and Districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerous international boards and committees. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the. United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering or technical boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other informal arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. TABLE 49-1 IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS YEAR ESTABLISHED 1. Int. Lakes Superior 2. Int. St. Croix River 3. Int. Lake of the Woods 4. Int. Lake Champlain 5. Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Massena, NY 3. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 49-1 BOARD NAME REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 IJC ENGINEERING OR STUDY BOARDS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board YEAR ESTABLISHED 1948 1975 1977 1979 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Envir. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Envir. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept.of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. NCEED-L, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. YEAR ESTABLISHED 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. OCE, DAEN-ECZ, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. 49-2 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the supervision of the Chief, Directorate of Research and Development. CERL, which is located in Champaign, IL, was officially dedicated on July 25, 1969, and is one of the Corps' four major laboratories. The laboratory is closely affiliated with the University of Illinois, sharing laboratory, library, computer, and personnel resources with the University. Colonel Norman C. Hintz, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. CERL research programs are oriented toward the support of the total Army, the Army in garrison, the military installation, the Department of Defense, and the nation as a whole. The laboratory, which has base support, combat support, and civil works missions, is engaged in a construction research program designed to improve planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a variety of Army and civil works facilities. The ultimate goal of the overall research effort is to create products that will save the Army resources. Research findings are transmitted directly to the field, as well as to private industry and the academic community. Within the Corps, research supports both military and civil works projects in the general areas of environmental quality, energy, materials, engineering management, and military engineering. In the area of environmental quality, CERL has developed a broad-based program designed to maintain military readiness standards, while still conforming to environmental quality regulations. These programs have included development of methods to predict noise impacts, water and air pollution control techniques, adaptations of currently used technologies to more stringent fluid and solid waste control, and computerized methods to cut the time and costs involved in environmental impact assessment. Energy research is oriented toward helping the Army meet its energy conservation goals. These projects include development of computer simulation technology for selection of more fuel-efficient energy systems and design methods and exploration of alternative fuel sources like solar energy and biomass. CERL's materials program is designed to lower the Army's costs for construction, modification, operation, and maintenance of its facilities. These projects include investigations on protective coatings, polymer technology, seismic criteria, quality monitoring systems, and materials syntheses and selection programs. CERL supports the Army decision-maker through its engineering management programs that are designed to increase facility efficiency and productivity. The development of automated data processing systems for management information, cost estimating, profit determination, architecture and design, corrosion mitigation, pavement management, housing contract maintenance, and habitability information have helped reduce costs throughout the military. During Fiscal Year 1986, CERL produced 160 publications, of which 63 were technical reports, 15 were Army-level publications, and 82 were publications presented in the public domain. In addition, CERL presonnel presented 51 papers at scientific meetings. CERL personnel prepared and presented 17 training programs in areas such as corrosion, automated specification editing and energy conservation. Operations and results during the period. Work performed during Fiscal Year 1986 was funded both directly and through reimbursable programs. CERL's total program was $39.2 million, of which $12.2 million was direct RDT&E funding and $14.3 million was reimbursable funding from the Office of the Chief of Engineers and Corps Divisions and Districts. Other Federal agencies, such as the Air Force, Navy, Federal Aviation Administration, and Environmental Protection Agency accounted for $12.7 million. About $2.5 million or 6.3% of the FY86 funding was in support of civil works activities. Several CERL technologies were developed or implemented for use by the Corps in support of civil works projects during FY86. The automated budget system (ABS) was installed at the Office of the Chief of Engineers and over 40 districts. The ABS assists managers of operations and maintenance activities on civil works structures in preparing budget information. The civil works energy data system (CWEDS) was field tested at the Detroit and Albuquerque Districts in FY86. The system assists Corps managers in maintaining data in support of energy management programs for civil works projects. Cathodic protection systems using the CERL-developed ceramic anode were installed on the Cape Canaveral Lock (Jacksonville District) and tainter gates on the Cordell Hull Dam (Nashville District). The anode can be manufactured and installed for half the cost of the previously used silicon-iron anode. The anode is being manufactured and marketed by an Ohio firm under an exclusive licensing agreement with the Army. 50-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (USAETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment formed to test aerial photographic mapping. Since that time, USAETL has grown into a sophisticated, modern research and development laboratory, applying the latest advances in electronics, computer data processing, space sciences, and related technologies to military and, civil problems in mapping, surveying, land navigation and geodesy. USAETL is now a field operating activity of the Corps of Engineers commanded by Colonel Alan L. Laubscher. USAETL is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of developments in the topographic sciences, from basic research to a final product. Support is provided to both the Military and Civil Works elements of the Corps and to the Army Materiel Command, Army Space Program Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Defense Mapping Agency. To provide this support, USAETL is organized into five operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Systems Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data for the Army in the field. The Topographic Developments Laboratory supports technological developments in surveying and mapmaking. The Space Programs Laboratory conducts research and development relating to the Army Space Program, and acts as the Corps' executive agent for space. The Research Institute performs most of the Laboratories' basic and applied research, and the Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by the Army elements in the field, as directed by the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence. During FY 86, copies of 38 USAETL reports on individual studies conducted at or for USAETL were distributed to Corps' offices and interested outside agencies. In recent years, the emphasis of USAETL's research and development program has shifted from conventional mapmaking and surveying equipment and related techniques to new topographic data systems, which are required to support the coming generation of complex weapon systems and military geographic information systems required by field commanders for improved command, control, communications and intelligence. The new systems frequently use data acquired by remote sensing, and much of the work done at USAETL involves this technology. USAETL researchers are investigating the types of data derived from sensors and the means for exploiting that data. Studies showing the possibility of automating image interpretation are an important aspect of this work. The knowledge gained in these areas will be applicable not only to the mapping and terrain analysis missions of USAETL, but also to the Army thrust of teleoperated and autonomous vehicles. Other work is to investigate the digital processing of remotely sensed data and to define remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. In addition, USAETL conducts short courses on remote sensing for Corps of Engineers and other government personnel. Operations and results during FY 86. The USAETL's total program for FY 86 was $85,393,000 (including $19,079,000 DARPA Direct Cite funds). This included work done for other agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. Of this total program, $33,699,000 supported work performed by contract. Work in FY 86 included $225,000 charged to civil works fund'. Civil works efforts in FY 86 focused on developing and demonstrating new survey techniques and equipment for use by districts and divisions. Scientists evaluated a complete survey system which uses signals transmitted by satellites of the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) to calculate extremely precise three-dimensional coordinates. Also using GPS, USAETL researchers began the development of an automatic dam deformation monitoring system. Other projects include work on a new technique for computing dredge volumes, and the investigation of the use of low-cost digital image analysis equipment in areas under the Corps' protection. 51-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY Background. The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (USACRREL), located in Hanover, New Hampshire, was created in January 1961. It merged the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment (created in 1949) and the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (created in 1953), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland and Greenland. The Laboratory's mission is to conduct and coordinate research and technology applicable to the Army's needs in those geographic areas of the world where cold presents a problem. The total authorized strength of USACRREL is 297 (279 civilian and 18 military), with a budget for FY86 of $25 million. USACRREL has six main buildings in Hanover (which total 284,000 square feet on 31 acres of land), including the main laboratory, the ice engineering facility, the logistics and supply building, the plant and equipment building, the equipment storage building and the frost effects research facility. CRREL's new Frost Effects Research Facility (FERF) is now operational and will aid in the study of frost heave. This unique 29,000-square-foot facility will allow research into the freeze-thaw phenomena of soil at an accelerated rate. The FERF's test program places emphasis on research into better ways of installing and maintaining paved surfaces, on frost heave problems, and on improving the performance of buried utilities in cold regions. USACRREL maintains a presence in Alaska at facilities located at Ft. Wainwright in Fairbanks. Cold regions research, appropriate to the Alaska location, is carried out by CRREL researchers. Facilities available include six buildings (totaling 30,000 square feet) and a permafrost tunnel (360-ft shaft drilled into frozen ground). USACRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice and frozen giound. Basic research supports applied research in the major cold regions mission areas of Fire Support, Combat Support, Combat Service Support, Base Support, Flood Control and Navigation, Surveying and Remote Sensing, Civil Works Environmental Quality and Civil Works Construction, and Operation and Maintenance. Major Civil Works cold regions research topics include Ice Engineering, River Ice Management, Cold Regions Hydrology, Remote Sensing, and Environmental Impact. As the only Federal laboratory dedicated to cold regions research, USACRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with Federal and State agencies where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the center of cold regions scientific and engineering expertise for the Corps of Engineers, USACRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, and by making field visits to consult on engineering problems. In recognition of USACRREL's arctic expertise, this summer the Navy relocated NORDA's polar oceanographic research group to Hanover. Operations and Results During FY86. During FY 86, USACRREL published and distributed 288 scientific and engineering reports (CRREL Reports; Monographs; Special Reports; Technical Notes; Technical Digests and information bulletins; journal articles; conference papers and abstracts; Corps, DA and other government publications; and books and nongovernment publications), contributed to 20 U.S. Army publications and presented 33 technical seminars and meetings. A total of 411 Installation Support or One-Stop Consulting Services were provided. One of USACRREL's major civil works research efforts is the five-year, $12-million River Ice Management (RIM) program. The goal of RIM is to develop and demonstrate techniques to improve navigation on inland waterways, particularly at Corps facilities. The work is focused on the Ohio and Upper Mississippi Rivers and the Illinois Waterway. USACRREL researchers received the Army Research and Development Award for development and demonstration of effective ice control measures at Corps locks and dams. High-efficiency bubbler systems were developed to force ice out of critical lock components. CRREL is directly supporting the basing of light infantry divisions at Ft. Drum, N.Y., and Ft. Wainwright, Alaska. An assistance group has been established to provide technical points of contact to assure 52-1 that the most up-to-date cold regions facilities technology is made available to Army construction agencies for these new facilities. CRREL is maintaining close contact with the Ft. Wainwright and Ft. Drum DEHs, the New York and Alaska Districts, and participating architect-engineer firms. Consultations have been provided on design of roofing systems, including roofing type and snow load criteria, and paving system, including roller compacted concrete. USACRREL is the Corps manager for remote sensing research. This Civil Works program assures that Divisions and Districts are provided with the latest remote sensing technology. In 1986-87 the French SPOT satellite is being evaluated for application to Corps requirements. In FY86 CRREL was asked to provide engineering services and cold weather testing for the U.S. Navy Fleet Hospital Project. A Navy fleet hospital and an Army field kitchen have been erected and the winter test is underway. Support in combat engineering, facility design and training area use was also provided to General Corns, 6th ID, Ft. Wainwright. Technical support is also provided to other DOD customers such as the Navy and the Air Force. This past winter extensive field and laboratory studies in support of the Navy's arctic submarine warfare efforts were conducted. For the Air Force, USACRREL continued to support planning and design efforts for the North Warning radar system. 52-2 WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC), under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, is commanded by Colonel George R. Kleb. The Center is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. Its divisions are the Institute for Water Resources, Dredging Division, Data Collection and Management Division, Publications and Training Division, and Office of Budget and Management Support. Elements managed by the Center in other locations include the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; the Marine Design Branch of the Dredging Division at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center of the Data Collection and Management Division at New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of WRSC during 1986 are given by division. DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT Video Disc: WRSC-C is the program manager for the interagency emergency operation video disc prototype system which was tested and evaluated in FY86. The system performed well but the telecommunication requires improvements which should be completed by mid FY87. This cooperative program involves Chief of Engineers Civil Works Operations and Readiness Division (DAEN-CWO), Southwestern Division (SWD), Lower Mississippi Valley Division (LMVD), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and United States Coast Guard. The objective is to provide the capabilities to transfer geographically related emergency operation data in near-real-time between Corps elements and other Federal, state, and local organizations for improved emergency management coordination. The system integrates "off the shelf," low cost video disc, microcomputers, graphics, and telecommunications technologies. Other applications for storage and retrieval of map products, training and briefing systems, as a subsystem for information network, are being explored. Remote Sensing Research Program: WRSC has begun the planning for the Corps 6th Remote Sensing Symposium to be held in Galveston, TX November 2-4, 1987. It will be hosted by the Southwestern Division, Galveston District with an expected attendance of 300 people. The Defense Mapping Agency has been designated as the DOD focal point for acquisition of space acquired imagery. WRSC is working with DMA to develop standard procedures for acquiring this imagery. Water Control Data Systems: The Corps use of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) data collection system (DCS) continues to increase but at a slower pace than in recent years. This slow down is the result primarily of two factors. One is that the Corps has already installed its most critical stations. Therefore, future increases can be expected to be less. The other major reason is the impending saturation of the NESDIS Ground System which is expected to be corrected in FY89. The Corps had 1992 Data Collections Planforms (DCP) in the system at end of FY86. This is more than any other agency and represents about 33 percent of the DCP's in the DCS. Following the acquisition in FY85 of computers dedicated to water control, field water control activities in FY86 concentrated on the development and enhancement of computer software to better utilize the computers and to further advance the automation of real time control of Corps projects. The automated cooperative stream gaging program with the U.S. Geological Survey was enhanced with additional programs written to help evaluate and manage the program. Such things as the various types of gages being used, their average costs by locale as well as maximum and minimum costs can now be readily derived. Telecommunications Planning: Telecommunications is one of the most important resources in support of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers operational functions. Today, the technological opportunities and the effects of deregulation together with increasing costs and dependencies has created a need for a centralized planning function within USACE to formulate a more coherent and integrated plan for utilization of the resource. WRSC-C is establishing a telecommunications planning organization responsible for developing and recommending a clear direction for management control and for formulation of guidelines to ensure a more integrated and cost effective approach to implementation and management of telecommunications systems and networks within the agency. Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center: The Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) has made several significant accomplishments in FY86: Completion of A-76 Management Study: The A-76 Management Study concluded that in order for WCSC to implement a most efficient organization (MEO), the computer software must be upgraded to the state of the art. Therefore, the schedule calls for a total redesign of WCSC's computer software with implemen- 53-1 tation in mid FY89. WCSC will reorganize into the MEO in FY90. Installation of the Harris 1000 Computer System: WCSC has installed a new Harris-1000 computer system and is in the process of converting software from the old computer system in time to process the CY87 Waterborne Commerce data. WCSC has already built a 1984 and 1985 data base using the ORACLE Data Base Management System on the Harris which allows for prompt querying of the data to respond to special data requests. A preliminary CY86 data base will be available in June 1987. Public Domain Data Base: In order to provide origin-destination waterborne commodity flow data to the public, WCSC has developed a public domain data base. Before making it available to the public, however, WCSC will show it to the 15 companies that have objected to the creation of such a data base and hope to convice them that their company-specific data is sufficiently immersed in the aggregated data such that no competitive harm will result from making this data public. A description of the public domain data base is as follows: a. The origins/destinations are the 26 National Waterways Study reaches. b. The commodities are the following 2-digit classifications: 01 Farm Products 09 Fish 10 Metallic Ores 11 Coal 13 Crude Oil 14 Non-Metallic Minerals 20 Food & Kindred Products 24 Lumber 26 Paper 28 Chemicals 29 Petroleum Products 32 Stone, Clay, & Glass 33 Primary Metal Products 40 Waste & Scrap Materials 41 Other Future Plans: WCSC will be improving its communications capability to provide remote data access at faster baud rates. This will be coupled with a set of standard queries for Corps offices to use to extract data from the WCSC data base.directly. Preliminary data bases will be created to allow for earlier, more timely estimates of waterborne tonnage. Radio Systems: WRSC-C is the technical coordinator for radio communications within the USACE. Major activities during FY86 include: High Frequency/Single Side Band Base Station: Has been awarded to ITT Mackey. The first system is scheduled for delivery in September 1987 and the last (47th) approximately 12 months later. This is a Civil Works program. The primary use of these radios is in coping with natural disasters. The design objectives are for divisions to communicate with neighboring divisions and subordinate districts. Districts will have the capability to communicate with neighboring districts and within their district boundaries. The system is designed to have a 90 percent reliability, 24-hours a day throughout the 11-year solar cycle. Cost of the system is 6 million dollars. High Frequency/Single Side Band Reconstitution Radio Program: This is an Army (ISC) - funded program in which USACE is scheduled for 48 systems at a value of more than 1.2 million dollars. The primary use of this radio is for natural emergencies, and for national mobilizations. Delivery is scheduled to commence in the first quarter of FY88. Transportable Communications System (TCS): A request for bids for a prototype Emergency Communications Shelter was announced in June 1986. Technical proposals were received November 1986 and evaluated. Further negotiations are scheduled for February 1987 with award in April 1987. The TCS is a self-contained transportable radio communications system capable of accommodating 2 communicators, as well as the equipment to communicate with ground personnel, mobile units, watercraft, aircraft, police, fire, and other emergency type vehicles. The shelter's basic use is similar to that of a permanent fixed station. In an emergency or major disaster the shelter can be moved into remote areas that lack commercial power or telephone lines. The shelter can also be used prior to, or during construction of a permanent communication network. The shelter will be deployable by means of a standard 2 1/2 ton military truck, helicopter, or a C-130 type cargo aircraft. HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING CENTER The mission of the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water resources management responsibilities through research, training and technical assistance in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis. The HEC makes every effort to be aware of the present needs and emerging problems of the water resources community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue with universities, private industry, other Federal agencies and state and 53-2 local governments to keep abreast of the latest developments through the profession. The Center provided substantial technical assistance to 25 Corps offices during FY86, including the Office of the Chief of Engineers, the Waterways Experiment Station and the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Technical assistance was also provided to other Federal agencies: the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. About one-fourth of HEC's resources were devoted to direct field assistance projects during FY86. Nine formal training courses involving 11 weeks of training were conducted at HEC. Two workshops, totaling one and one-half weeks, were also held. A Fulbright Fellow from Australia worked with the HEC for three months. Research funding was a relatively high (about one-half) proportion of HEC's budget this year. Planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of today's multiple-purpose water projects require complex interdisciplinary analyses. These complex problems present major methodological and computational tasks to water resources professionals. The HEC seeks solutions to these problems through development of systematic methods and application of the computational power of computers. Research activities were carried out in 14 work units. These work units represent specific technical areas that have been identified in the Corps R&D program. The HEC's primary research area is entitled "Analytical Techniques in Water Resources Planning Studies." The HEC also participates in the Corps research program in water conservation and supply, planning methodologies, remote sensing, and dam safety. New work units addressing flood warning systems and water quality procedures for water control management began this year. HEC's R&D work units for FY87 are shown below: Improvements in Methods of Evaluating Hydrologic Phenomena Computer Methods for Water Resources Planning Real-Time Reservoir Regulation Modernization of Computer Programs Water Resource Data Storage System Flood Forecasting for Use During Flood Emergencies Analytical Techniques for Evaluating Reservoir Systems Water Quality Procedures for Water Control Management Spatial Data Management and Analysis System Flood Warning Systems Groundwater Recharge and Storage Remote Sensing and Spatial Data Applications Hydrologic/Hydraulic Risk Assessment of Dams Hydrologic Methods for Determining Water Supply Potential Focus continues on the development of practical computer programs and companion user materials for use by field office professional staff. Areas that received particular emphasis this past year include: dam safety risk-cost studies; water control and flood forecasting;, flood damage computations and data management; and water surface profile accuracy. Extensive analyses of risk-cost methods for dam safety applications were made. The research investigated the feasibility of determining the probability of rare floods like the probable maximum flood used for spillway design. Two case studies were used to evaluate the trade-offs between the cost of increasing spillway capacity versus the benefits expected from fewer dam failures. The use of microcomputers to assist in flood control planning continued to receive increased attention. Several important HEC hydrologic engineering and flood damage analysis computer programs were integrated into a package for analysis of flood control/ damage mitigation benefits. An in-depth assessment of the importance of the accuracy of land surveys and hydraulic parameter estimates on the accuracy of computer water surface profiles in the vicinity of highway bridge crossings was made for the Federal Highway Administration. The primary objective of the study was to develop the methodology to enable sound decisions regarding field surveys and data collection that would be needed to obtain a desired water surface profile accuracy. Several commercially available survey technologies were studied. Significant advances were made in improving HEC's library of computer programs during FY86. Ten programs were developed or revised this year, mostly in the reservoir system simulation area. HEC programs were upgraded to FORTRAN77 standards to make them more transportable to other computers. Eleven HEC programs were added to the 16 microcomputer versions already available in FY85 from HEC. These 27 microcomputer programs cover technical areas of rainfall-runoff, river hydraulics, flood flow frequency, flood damage computations, groundwater analysis, small-scale hydropower cost, and spatial data management. Also available are utility programs for printing summary output reports, editing files, and assisting in preparing data input for channel hydraulics analysis. Several others will be available next year. During FY86 HEC distributed about 2300 computer programs to other Federal, state, local governments, universities, and private industry, both domestic and foreign. HEC actively provides assistance to all its program users. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES Policy Studies Division The Policy Studies Division develops analysis, background, and decision support on critical water issues for the Civil Works Directorate, coordinated through the Office of Policy. The work of the Division includes investigations in policy development, program management, evaluation methodologies, new missions, and strategic planning. In fiscal year 1986, important water issue areas addressed were water project development and implementation partnerships, private sector access to Corps lockage statistics, institutional impacts of cost sharing requirements, effectiveness of flood warning systems, and financial analysis on the Oregon Inlet project. 53-3 The Policy Studies Division also provided a wide range of other support activities for OCE in FY86. Some of these activities included such items as preparation of materials for the National Council on Public Works Improvement (NCPWI), assistance to high school debate activities on national water policy, data development customer care and dispute resolution activities, and coordination for an engineering pamphlet on partnership in planning and Corps strategic planning policies. Other topics and support developed by the Policy Studies Division consisted of the following: slackwater port development, hydrology workshops, and professionalism in engineering and participation in policy. development task force. Research Division The Research Division work in FY86 included development of a comprehensive microcomputer-based water demand forecasting model for use in water supply studies, testing of a contingent valuation methodology for recreation assessment, and Deep Draft Evaluation procedures. Work continues in the areas of economic and demographic forecasting, economic effects of lock congestion, port analysis and flood damage assessment and evaluation techniques. Research into microcomputer applications for planning analysis and research to develop techniques for risk assessment related to the safety of Corps dams is continuing. The Institute's training program provides a means for transferring research results and state-of-the-art planning techniques to various Corps users. Courses on topics ranging in scope from Conflict Management to Economic Analysis for Water Resources Planning were conducted during the year. During FY86 approximately 380 persons attended 15 sessions of 10 training courses. Navigation Division The Navigation Division was formed in 1983 by combining the Navigation Analysis Center and the National Waterways Study staff. The Navigation Division supports Corps planners by development and maintenance of transportation planning data bases on waterway carriers, other transportation modes, and commodity movements; development of analytical capabilities; and dissemination of technical information and advice with regard to use of navigation data and analytical techniques. The division also conducts studies and performs reimbursable and research studies for HQUSACE and field offices. One of the important data bases is the lock Performance Monitoring System (PMS), which contains information of Corps lock operations 'on the inland waterways. This data base enables Corps personnel to study lock operation and performance; to determine methods, benefits, and costs of improving the waterway system; to monitor traffic and commodities moving on the inland waterways; and monitor conditions that could affect traffic flow. The Navigation Division lead Corps efforts to develop and test methodologies for multiport analysis. These methods help local ports to design workable cost recovery strategies and help identify the traffic which can shift easily between ports as relative port and ocean leg costs shift. A draft manual combining significant economic and engineering attributes of non-deepening alternatives which facilitate loading and unloading of deep draft vessels has been developed. Vessel operating costs (ocean and inland), waterway and tow characteristics, and commodity and other economic projections are maintained to support various navigation systems studies. The Navigation Division has developed computer models to estimate economic development which would occur due to water resource and navigation projects, and maintains the navigation user charge data base, which is used to estimate impacts of various cost recovery policies and strategies. DREDGING DIVISION National Dredging Program In FY86, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers spent $350 million for maintenance and improvements to dredge rivers, channels, and harbors to remove 300 million cubic yards of material. There was little change in the amount of material removed in recent years; however, there was a significant decrease in the annual expenditure because of the increased pricing competition in the dredging industry during this period. Environmental Studies During FY86, the Dredging Division of the Water Resources Support Center continued to place a high priority on completing required designation studies for the 124 historically used ocean disposal sites which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated on an interim basis in 1977. To date, EPA has provided final designation for 17 of these sites. The EPA is continuing to place emphasis on completing the supporting environmental documentation required by their policies for final designation of these sites. The Corpsestablished goal for completing all remaining studies to support EPA final designation for these sites is by the end of FY88. Based on guidance from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the Dredging Division revised 33 CFR 209.145, the Corps regulation specifying environmental compliance requirements for Corps O&M dredging projects. This proposed regulation revision, which will be moved to 33 CFR Parts 335-338 to follow the Corps permit regulation, was published as a proposed rule on 30 May 1986 in the Federal Register. The public comment period on this regulation ended on 15 August 1986. Since a large number of comments were received and are being evaluated, the final regulation is scheduled for publication in the spring or summer of 1987. 53-4 The Dredging Division continued technical discussions with EPA on the development of consistent and technically appropriate testing procedures and disposal alternative evaluations for projects requiring the removal of highly contaminated bottom sediments. A technical protocol developed by the Corps in FY85 is being applied by EPA at two of its major Superfund projects, Commencement Bay, Washington; and New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts. Dredging is being evaluated at these two projects as a remedial action alternative for cleaning up highly contaminated bottom sediment "hot spots" within the waterways. The Corps is continuing to refine this testing protocol based on the experience gained at these Superfund sites as well as through other project applications within the Corps, one such project being a dredging and disposal demonstration project at Indiana Harbor within the North Central Division. Under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and a broad agreeement for cooperation in the field of environmental protection between the United States and Japan, the 11th annual meeting of experts on the management of bottom sediments containing toxic sediments was held in Seattle, WA. Papers of particular importance were delivered on dewatering of dredged sediments, long-term management of dredged material disposal and containment activities, rehabilitation of contaminated water bodies, eutrophication, control of dredge-induced turbidity, and effects of contaminated sediments on the water column and the biological community. Developments in recent technology for stabilizing soft, highly organic sediments such as found at Superfund projects have proven particularly useful in ongoing efforts. In support of proposed deep-draft navigation projects included under P.L. 99-662 and the anticipated large volumes of new work dredged material which would be generated, the Dredging Division sponsored two national workshops during FY86. The first of these, on the subject of long-term management strategies for dredged material, was held in Jackson, Mississippi, and was well attended by FOAs. The recommendations derived from that workshop will provide major input in the development of national Corps policy and guidance on this subject. The second workshop, on "Beneficial Uses of Dredged Materials", was an interagency workshop held in Pensacola, Florida, co-sponsored by EPA, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The results of that workshop are scheduled for publication as a bound proceedings in March 1987. The Dredging Division also provided support to the Office of Policy, Civil Works Directorate, on the planning of the deepenings of Baltimore and Norfolk Harbors. In addition, the planning for a feeder beach concept using dredged material to improve the badly eroded shore line caused by hurricanes at Dauphin Island was coordinated with the South Atlantic Division and the Mobile District. Plans for a stable berm in this area created from dredged material from the Mobile Harbor deepening project will be underway in FY87 in conjunction with the South Atlantic Division and the Mobile District. These initiatives are being closely coordinated with NMFS headquarters personnel. Revolving Fund The Dredging Division allocated $93 million from the Plant Replacement and Improvement Program (PRIP) Fund to divisions, districts, and field operating activities for FY86. These allocations were for replacements and improvements to structures, dredges, floating plants, mobile and fixed land plant, as well as tools, office furniture and equipment necessary to support Corps-wide missions and activities. During the year, the Director of Civil Works reviewed the use and status of PRIP and implemented procedures for its more effective management. Marine Design Center In FY86, the Marine Design Center (MDC) managed 44 floating plant projects on a fully reimbursable basis. The work included both design and construction contract management. The design work was carried out by the regular staff of naval architects and marine engineers together with architect engineer contract support. Approximately 32 percent of the engineering and design program, which consisted of 34 projects for 20 Corps districts, was performed by contract. The design projects included the preliminary design of a new minimum fleet dustpan dredge, the conceptual design of a SWATH surveyboat to provide improved performance in exposed waters and a design and contract package of a river ice plow for the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Construction contract management was carried out on nine projects for eight districts at a total contract value of $7,622,222. New plant delivered to the operators in FY86 consisted of six deck cargo barges, a 60-foot surveyboat/towboat, and a power service barge. Two major design projects came to fruition in FY86 in the form of completed shipyard conversions of vintage Corps of Engineers plant from steam to diesel power. One of these was the dustpan dredge JADWIN, completed in July so that the dredge would be available for the full dredging season. The total project cost was $8.5 million and resulted in a vessel with 10 percent greater production and a fuel savings of 50 percent. The other was the gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN, completed in June Sat a total project cost of $1.4 million. The vessel, as converted, is more fuel efficient and can operate with a reduced crew. Both projects included conversion and repair work designed to extend the life of each vessel by a minimum of 15 years with little loss of productive dredging time due to the rehabilitations. 53-5 Support to Others The Dredging Division prepared a cost-estimate, construction methodology, geotechnical assessment and environmental review of the Gaillard Cut Widening Project for the Panama Canal Commission at their request. The final report on this effort was provided to the Commission during the last quarter of 1986. 53-6 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Yukon-Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Blakely Mountain Dam Ouachita Blue Mountain Arkansas DeGray Ouachita DeQueen Red Dierks Red Gillham Red Millwood Red Narrows Dam Ouachita Nimrod Arkansas CALIFORNIA Black Butte Sacramento Brea Santa Ana Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake San Joaquin Carbon Canyon Santa Ana Coyote Valley Russian Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Russian Farmington San Joaquin Fullerton Santa Ana Hansen Los Angeles Harry L. Englebright Sacramento Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake San Joaquin Isabella San Joaquin Lopez Los Angeles Martis Creek Sacramento Merced County Stream Group: Bear San Joaquin Burns San Joaquin Mariposa San Joaquin Owens San Joaquin Mojave River Mojave New Hogan San Joaquin North Fork Sacramento Pine Flat San Joaquin Prado Santa Ana San Antonio Santa Ana Santa Fe San Gabriel Sepulveda Los Angeles Success San Joaquin Terminus San Joaquin Whittier Narrows San Gabriel COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson IDAHO Lucky Peak Missouri Missouri Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Columbia Chena River Fairbanks Skunk Creek Phoenix Bill Williams River Wenden Cave Creek Phoenix Dreamy Draw Phoenix New River Phoenix Gila River Gila Bend Santa Rosa Wash Casa Grande Queen Creek Superior Ouachita Hot Springs Petit Jean River Paris Caddo Arkadelphia Rolling Fork River DeQueen Saline River Dierks Cossatot River Gillham Little River Ashdown Little Missouri Murfreesboro Fourche La Fave River Plainview Stony Creek Orland Brea Creek Fullerton Chowchilla River Chowchilla Carbon Canyon River Brea East Fork Russian River Ukiah Dry Creek Healdsburg Littlejohn Creek Farmington East Fullerton Creek Fullerton Big Tujunga Wash Los Angeles Yuba River Marysville Fresno River Madera Kern River Bakersfield Pacoima Wash San Fernando Martis Creek Reno Bear Creek Merced Burns Creek Merced Mariposa Creek Merced Owens Creek Merced Mojave Victorville Calaveras Valley Springs American River Auburn Kings River Piedra Santa Ana River Corona San Antonio Creek Upland San Gabriel River Duarte Los Angeles River Van Nuys Tule River Porterville Kaweah River Visalia San Gabriel River and Rio Hondo El Monte Bear Creek Denver South Platte River Denver Cherry Creek Denver Arkansas River Lamar Purgatoire River Trinidad Branch Brook Thomaston West Branch, Farmington River Riverton Hancock Brook Plymouth Hop Brook Middlebury Natchaug River Willimantic Northfield Brook Thomaston Naugatuck River Thomaston Quinebaug Thompson Boise River Boise 1981 2,000 NPP FR Earth 1982 18,350 1968 1,046,310 1979 46,600 1973 320 1985 43,520 1959 2,491,700 1974 198,550 1960 35,500 1955 2,768,500 1947 257,900 1971 881,900 1977 136,100 1975 96,800 1975 221,800 1966 1,854,930 1949 407,900 1942 336,010 1963 160,000 1942 4,010 1975 150,000 1961 6,610 1959 122,500 1983 381,000 1952 52,000 1941 760 1940 25,450 1941 69,000 1975 90,000 1953 570,000 1954 440 1971 20,400 1954 7,700 1950 7,000 1948 15,000 1949 3,600 1971 89,670 1963 325,000 1939 14,700 1954 1,000,000 1941 196,240 1956 7,700 1948 32,110 1941 17,430 1960 85,000 1961 150,000 1957 35,150 1978 30,810 1974 231,429 1950 93,920 1943 615,500 1977 123,500 1970 8,700 1969 97,700 1960 4,030 1968 6,970 1952 52,000 1965 2,430 1960 42,000 1965 26,800 1956 306,000 NPP FR Earth 560 FRWX Earth NPP FRX Earth NPP FRX Earth NPP F Earth NPP FRWX Earth NPP FWX Earth NPP FX Earth 50 40,200 109 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 50 448 104 2,320 181 4,780 75.5 12,500 149 837 20,900 FP Earth 235 1,100 2,910 FRWX Earth 115 2,800 6,400 FPQRS Earth 243 3,400 1,680 FSQRW Earth 160 2,360 1,360 FSRAW Earth & Rock 153 2,500 1,370 FSQW Earth & Rock 160 1,750 29,200 FSW Earth 88 17,554 2,500 FP Concrete 175 941 3,550 FSWX Concrete 97 1,012 770 FIRX Earth 156 2,970 NPP FRX Earth 87 1,765 470 FIRW Earth & Rock 205.5 1,800 NPP FRX Earth 99 2,610 1,700 FRX Earth 160 3,500 500 FRSW Earth 319 3,000 NPP F Earth 60 7,800 NPP FRX Earth 46 575 120 FRWX Earth 97 10,475 400 DR Concrete 280 1,142 5,000 FIRW Earth 163 5,730 1,850 FIRW Earth 185 4,952 NPP FX Earth 50 1,300 71 FSR Earth 113 2,670 NPP F Earth 92 1,830 NPP F Earth 55 4,075 NPP F Earth 88 1,330 NPP F Earth 75 790 NPP FRWX Earth 200 2,200 715 FIRX Earth & Rock 210 1,960 280 DR Concrete 155 620 NPP FIRX Concrete 429 1,820 NPP FRX Earth 106 2,280 NPP FX Earth 160 3,850 NPP FRX Earth 92 23,800 NPP FRX Earth 57 15,444 400 FIRX Earth 142 3,490 345 FIRX Earth 250 2,375 NPP FRWX Earth 56 16,960 109 FRX Earth 180 5,300 1,412 FRX Earth 148 12,500 852 FRX Earth 141 14,300 1,844 FIR Concrete & Earth 106 13,274 280 FIRX Earth 200 6,610 20 FR Earth 760 FRSX Earth 40 FRW Earth 21 FR Earth 450 FRW Earth 8 FRW Earth NPP F Earth 200 FRW Earth 2,850 FIR Earth 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 250 1,700 A-1 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie IOWA Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Coralville Upper Mississippi Rathbun Missouri Red Rock Upper Mississippi Saylorville Upper Mississippi KANSAS Clinton Missouri Council Grove Arkansas El Dorado Arkansas Elk City Arkansas Fall River Arkansas Hillsdale Missouri John Redmond Arkansas Kanopolis Missouri Marion Arkansas Melvern Missouri Milford Missouri Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Arkansas Perry Missouri Pomona Missouri Toronto Arkansas Tuttle Creek Missouri Wilson Missouri KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville LOUISIANA Bayou Bodcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Jennings Randolph Lake Potomac MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Connecticut Birch Hill Connecticut Buffumville Thames Charles River Natural Charles Valley Storage Conant Brook Connecticut East Brimfield Connecticut Hodges Village Connecticut Knightville Connecticut Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Iowa River Chariton River Des Moines River Des Moines River Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marias Des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill Creek Delaware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River Little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Terre Haute Rockville. Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Centerville Des Moines Des Moines Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Kansas City Burlington Salina Marion Melvern Junction City Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsille Pikeville Grayson Campbellsville Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Royalston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington 1967 983,000 1951 15,500 1951 3,780 1970 684,000 1970 294,000 1974 359,600 1952 228,120 1960 132,800 1969 153,100 1967 368,400 1964 441,000 1978 301,600 1966 263,600 1958 492,000 1969 552,000 1969 1,830,000 1975 602,000 1977 397,200 1964 112,265 1981 236,200 1966 284,300 1949. 256,400 1981 160,000 1964 630,250 1948 450,000 1968 143,850 1972 363,000 1965 1,160,000 1981 40,600 1969 770,000 1963 230,000 1960 200,800 1962 2,346,000 1964 776,000 1964 815,200 1960 168,000 1976 47,700 1974 614,100 1949 93,000 1968 164,360 1967 118,990 1969 723,200 1978 21,000 1983 73,500 1963 609,400 1958 334,400 1983 291,670 1949 357,300 1971 175,000 1946 88,300 1981 130,900 1958 24,000 1941 49,900 1958 12,700 1983 35,000 1966 3,740 1960 30,000 1959 12,800 1941 49,000 26,000 FSNRWA Earth NPP F Earth NPP F Earth 11,100 FSNRW Earth 18,900 FQRSW Earth 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 2,250 FRSW Earth & Rock 182 3,000 1,400 FRX Earth 150 950 1,100 FRX Earth 117 1,790 500 FRW Earth 91 5,332 1,100 FRW Earth 137 8,100 3,280 FARS Earth 93 1,400 2,010 FRSQW Earth & Rock 84 1,550 976 FRW Earth 133 6,100 1,820 FARW Earth 11,000 FNRWXQ Earth 8,950 FARWQ Earth 74,000 FARWQ Earth 100 1,400 86 10,600 110 5,676 125 6,750 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 114 9,250 3,235 FSQR Earth 96 6,500 8,000 FSQR Earth 99 20,930 4,450 FSQ Earth 107 4,840 2,350 FSX Earth 94 6,015 4,580 FSQR Earth 75 11,600 9,280 FSQR Earth 86.5 21,790 3,815 FRWX Earth 131 15,360 6,200 FRQS Earth 67 8,375 6,930 FRQWX Earth 98 9,700 15,600 FRSXWQ Earth & Rock 126 6,300 1,240 FSR Earth 83 3,870 12,200 FRSXW Earth & Rock 95 . 7,750 4,000 FRSWXQ Earth & Rock 85 7,750 2,660 FX Earth 90 4,712 15,800 FRWXQAN Earth & Rock 157 7,500 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth 160 5,600 4,340 FARS Earth 146 3,970 550 FR Earth 162 1,020 530 FQRW Earth & Rock 130 720 6,790 FQRW Earth & Rock 148 2,740 1,100 FARW Earth 118 913 569 FARW Rock 195 1,100 1,050 FQRW Earth & Rock 120 1,460 5,070 FRSQW Earth & Rock 142 2,350 578 FQ Concrete 97 574 261 FQRW Earth & Rock 160 1,600 2,890 FAR Earth & Rock 174 990 2,180 FRX Earth & Rock 124 1,530 1,625 FQRW Earth & Rock 164 1,280 NPP FRW Earth 32,700 NFRS Concrete & Earth 2,300 FR Earth 76 12,850 3,600 48 4,934 952 FQRS Earth & Rock 296 2,130 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 62 885 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 56 1,400 200 FRW Earth & Rock 66 3,255 NPP F Nonstructural - - NPP F Earth & Rock 85 1,050 360 FRW Earth & Rock 55 520 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 55 2,140 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 160 1,200 A-2 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MASSACHUSEITTS (Continued) Littleville Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River Lac Qui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch Longview Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Papillion Creek and Tributaries: Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Salt Creek & Tributaries: Olive Creek (Site 2) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach (Site 9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Conestoga (Site 12) Twin Lake (Site 13) Pawnee (Site 14) Holmes Park Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Cochiti Conchas Connecticut Connecticut Blackstone Thames Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Red River of the North Red River of the North Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi White Grande Chariton Missouri Missouri Missouri Lower Mississippi Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Colorado Colorado Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Middle Branch, Westfield River Tully River West River Quinebaug River Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Minnesota River Otter Tail River Red Lake River Coldwater River Yocona River Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie River Black River Little Chariton Little Blue River Pomme de Terre River Little Platte River St. Francis River Chester Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Kansas City Hermitage Smithville Wappapello 1965 1949 1960 1961 1973 1950 1950 1950 1953 1951 1943 1951 1954 1969 1940 1948 1980 1986 1961 1982 1941 32,400 22,000 12,350 11,100 45,000 (2) 122,800 35,000 14,100 2,680,000 525,300 660,000 1,337,400 142,400 1,570,000 413,700 65,000 46,900 650,000 246,500 613,200 275 FRWS 300 FRW NPP FRW 23 FRW 12,700 NPP 6,500 5,100 210 279,000 FRW FRWX FRWX FRWX FARS FARSX 5,100 F Earth & Rock 6,100 F Earth & Rock 9,800 F Earth & Rock 1,280 FQSR Earth 10,700 F Earth & Rock 1,630 2,430 930 7,820 7,190 4,100 FRWX FRSQW FRWQ FRWX FSQRW FR Republican River Republican City 1952 850,000 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 107 11,827 Knight Creek Trib. of Big Papillion Creek S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek N. Trib. Olive Br. Creek N. Trib. Hickman Creek S. Trib. Hickman Creek Cardwell Creek Holmes Creek Middle Creek N. Middle Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset River Contoocook River Piscataquog River Otter Brook Ashuelot River Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman Denton Denton Pleasantdale Emerald Lincoln Raymond Webster West Peterborough Franklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Mathews Canyon Caliente Pine Canyon Caliente Rio Chama Rio Grande Canadian River Abiquiu Pena Blanca Tucumcari 1975 1973 1964 1963 1963 1964 1966 1964 1966 1965 1963 1968 1941 1950 1943 1962 1962 1958 1941 17,910 392 FQRX Earth 5,220 137 FRX Earth 5,470 10,260 9,280 6,640 7,560 10,640 8,080 29,520 6,510 97,560 46,000 12,800 154,000 71,500 87,500 18,300 32,500 174 315 303 196 208 230 255 728 100 1,780 NPP NPP NPP 200 120 85 265 FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW 1957 6,270 NPP FX Earth 1957 7,750 NPP FX Earth 1963 1975 1939 1,212,000 596,300 529,000 NPP FXS Earth 1,200 FRWX Earth 3,000 FI Concrete & Earth A-3 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock 1,164 62 51 78 25 23.3 21 19.5 47 15.5 81 99 102 67 117 154 71 120 155 95 109 1,360 1,570 2,400 560 13,700 17,975 4,100 11,800 1,355 36,500 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 4,225 3,800 1,900 4,630 4,200 2,700 Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock 67 70 45 57 52 48 52 63 58 65 55 70 75 67 140 76 115 133 86 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1,940 1,460 3,020 2,760 1,650 2,250 3,100 3,000 2,075 5,000 7,700 5,200 1,150 1,030 1,740 790 2,000 1,288 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 251 200 1,540 28,300 19,400 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEW MEXICO (Continued) Galisteo Rio Grande Jemez Canyon Rio Grande Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rio Grande Rocky Dam Rio Grande Santa Rosa Dam & Pecos Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Bowman-Haley Homme Pipestem OHIO Alum Creek Ohio Berlin Ohio Caesar Creek Ohio Clarence J. Brown Ohio Deer Creek Ohio Delaware Ohio Dillon Ohio Michael J. Kirwan Ohio Mosquito Creek Ohio Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Ohio Beach City Ohio Bolivar Ohio Charles Mill Ohio Clendening Ohio Dover Ohio Leesville Ohio Mohawk Ohio Mohicanville Ohio Piedmont Ohio Pleasant Hill Ohio Senecaville Ohio Tappan Ohio Wills Creek Ohio North Branch, Ohio Kokosing River Lake Paint Creek Ohio Tom Jenkins Ohio West Fork Mill Creek Ohio William H. Harsha Ohio OKLAHOMA Birch Arkar Canton Arkar Copan Arkar Fort Supply Arkar Greak Salt Plains Arkar Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaiw Oologah Optima Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin-Pee Dee Galisteo Creek Jemez River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyo Pecos Canacadea Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otselic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Albuquerque Bernalillo Roswell Santa Rosa Hornell Arkport Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Red River of the North Sheyenne River Valley City Missouri North Fork, Grand River Haley Red River of the North South Branch of Park River Park River James River Pipestem Creek Jamestown Alum Creek Mahoning River Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Olentangy River Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Delaware Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland Indian Fork New Cumberland Sugar Creek Beach City Sandy Creek Bolivar Black Fork Mufflin Brushy Fork Tippecanoe Tuscarawas River Dover McGuire Creek Leesville Walhonding River Nellie Lake Fork Mohicanville Stillwater Creek Piedmont Clear Fork Perrysville Seneca Fork Senecaville Little Stillwater Creek Tappan Wills Creek Conesville North Branch of Fredericktown Kokosing River Paint Creek New Petersburg East Branch, Gloucester Sunday Creek Mill Creek Mount Healthy Little Miami River Williamsburg Birch Creek Barnsdall North Canadian River Canton Little Caney River Copan Wolf Creek Fort Supply Salt Fork, Cherokee Arkansas River Polecat Creek Sapulpa Kiamichi River Hugo Caney River Caney Arkansas River Ponca City Verdigris River Oologah North Canadian River Hardesty Little River Wright City Jackfork Creek Clayton Hominy Creek Skiatook Beaver Creek Waurika Poteau River Wister A-4 Isas nsas nsas nsas nsas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas 1970 89,000 1953 102,700 1963 168,000 1979 447,000 1949 14,600 1940 7,900 1950 33,550 1952 337,000 1942 86,440 1982 753,500 1983 335,600 1963 153,000 1950 70,000 1967 92,980 1951 3,650 1974 146,880 1975 134,800 1943 91,200 1978 242,200 1974 63,700 1968 102,500 1951 132,000 1961 273,000 1966 78,700 1944 104,100 1937 49,700 1937 71,700 1938 149,600 1936 88,000 1937 54,000 1938 203,000 1937 37,400 1937 285,000 1936 102,000 1937 65,000 1938 87,700 1937 88,500 1936 61,600 1937 196,000 1973 14,900 1972 145,000 1951 26,900 1952 11,380 1978 284,500 1977 58,200 1948 377,100 1983 227,700 1942 100,700 1941 271,400 1950 55,030 1974 966,700 1951 289,000 1976 1,348,000 1963 1,519,000 1978 229,500 1969 465,780 1983 429,600 1985 500,700 1977 343,500 1949 427,900 NPP FX NPP FX NPP FX NPP FIX Earth Earth Earth Earth 124 FRW Earth NPP F Earth 210 FRW Concrete & Earth 170 FR Concrete 1,200 FRW Earth 14,300 FQRSWX Earth 11.300 FQRSWX Earth 1,470 FARSX Earth 325 FARS Earth 1,750 FSRWX Earth 51 FARS Earth 885 FRWX Earth 158 2,820 135 780 98 4,885 118 2,940 212 1,950 90 1,260 113 1,200 130 2,010 210 1,028 95 4,900 112 1,330 92 1,915 148 1,740 61 1,650 79 5,730 67 865 108 4,000 348 FRSW Concrete 93 10,000 & Earth 240 FARSWQ Concrete 96 5,750 & Earth 13,300 FRSQW Earth & Rock 165 2,750 1,010 FQRW Earth & Rock 72 6,620 727 FRW Earth 93 3,880 950 FARWX Earth 92 18,600 1,325 FRWX Earth 118 1,400 580 FAQRSW Earth 83 9,900 700 FARSWQ Earth 47 5,650 1,540 FRX Earth 65 3,700 420 FRX Earth 64 5,600 NPP FR Earth 87 6,300 1,350 FRX Earth 48 1,390 1,800 FRX Earth 64 950 350 FRX Concrete 83 824 1,000 FRX Earth 74 1,694 NPP FR Earth 111 2,330 NPP FR Earth 46 1,220 2,270 FRX Earth 56 1,750 850 FRX Earth 113 775 3,550 FRSX Earth 45 2,350 2,350 FRX Earth 52 1,550 900 FRX Earth 87 1,950 98 FRW Earth 71 1,400 710 FRSQW Earth & Rock 118 700 394 FRSWX Concrete 84 944 200 FRX Earth 100 1,100 18,760 FRSQW Earth 200 1,450 1,137 FSQRW Earth 7,910 FSI Earth 4,850 FSQRW Earth 1,820 FSX Earth 8,690 FRWX Earth 880 FRWXS Earth 13,250 FSQRW Earth 3,570 FSAX Earth 17,040 FSQRW Earth 29,460 FSN Earth 5,340 FSRW Earth 3,750 FSQW Earth 14,360 FSRW Earth 10,190 FSQRW Earth 10,100 FISQWR Earth 5,360 FSAX Earth 97 3,193 73 15,140 70 7,730 85 12,225 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 7,712 81 14,138 143 3,590 106 16,600 99 5,700 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinsua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenango Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes -Hammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam White Rock TEXAS Rogue River Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna River Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Applegate River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Willow Creek Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Eugene Eugene Heppner Kettle Creek Renovo Aylesworth Creek Archbald Pohopoco Lehighton Tulephocken Blue Marsh Conemaugh River Saltsburg Cowanesque River Lawrenceville Crooked Creek Ford City West Branch, Curwensville Susquehanna River East Branch, Wilcox Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Blanchard Lehigh River White Haven Dyberry Creek Honesdale Codorus Creek York Allegheny River Warren Loyalhanna Creek Saltsburg Mahoning Creek New Bethlehem Lackawaxen River Honesdale Raystown Branch, Huntingdon Juniata River Shenanago River Sharpsville Lackawanna River Uniondale Tioga River Tioga Crooked Creek Tioga Tionesta Creek Tionesta French Creek Union City French Creek Meadville Youghiogheny River Confluence Missouri Cold Brook Missouri Cottonwood Springs Creek Red River of the North Bois de Sioux River Red River of the North Bois de Sioux River Addicks San Jacinto Aquilla Brazos Bardwell Trinity Barker San Jacinto Belton Brazos Benbrook Trinity Canyon Guadalupe Ferrells Bridge Dam- Red Lake O' the Pines Granger Dam and Lake Brazos Grapevine Trinity Hords Creek Colorado Lake Kemp Red Lavon Trinity Lewisville Trinity Navarro Mills Trinity North San Gabriel Dam, Brazos Lake Georgetown Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton South Mayde Creek Addicks Aquilla Creek Hillsboro Waxahachie Creek Ennis Buffalo Bayou Barker Leon River Belton Clear Fork, Trinity River Fort Worth Guadalupe New Braunfels Cypress Creek Jefferson San Gabriel River Granger Denton Creek Grapevine Hords Creek Coleman Wichita River Wichita Falls East Fork, Trinity River Fort Worth Elm Fork, Trinity River Lewisville Richland Creek Corsicana North Fork, Georgetown San Gabriel River 1981 82,000 1968 85,000 1942 30,060 1949 70,500 1965 115,000 1941 110,000 1983 13,250 1962 75,000 1970 1,700 1971 68,250 1978 22,900 1952 274,000 1980 89,000 1940 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 1961 110,000 1960 24,500 1942 28,000 1965 1,180,000 1942 95,300 1941 74,200 1960 52,000 1973 762,000 1966 191,400 1960 12,000 1978 62,000 1978 63,000 1940 133,400 1970 47,640 1973 20,000 1943 254,000 1953 7,200 1970 8,385 1941 164,500 1941 85,000 1948 204,500 1983 146,000 1965 140,000 1945 207,000 1954 1,097,600 1952 258,600 1964 740,900 1959 842,100 1980 244,200 1952 425,500 1948 25,310 1972 502,900 1953 748,200 1954 989,700 1962 212,200 1980 130,800 988 AFIQRSW Gravel Em- 242 1,300 bankment 975 FINR Earth 319 1,329 1,155 FINR Concrete 114 2,110 & Earth 1,885 FINR Concrete 145 3,352 & Earth 1,865 FINR Rockfill 193 5,100 & Concrete 10,305 FINR Rockfill 49 6,624 & Concrete 96 FRN Roller 160 1,780 Compacted Concrete 160 FRW Earth & Rock 165 1,350 NPP F Earth & Rock 90 1,270 947 FQRSW Earth & Rock 170 4,300 963 FAQRS Earth & Rock 98 1,775 300 FW Concrete 137 1,265 & Earth 410 FR Earth & Rock 151 3,100 350 FRW Earth 143 1,480 790 FR Earth 131 2,850 90 FARQW Earth 184 1,725 1,730 FRW Earth 100 6,835 90 FNRW Earth & Rock 234 3,000 NPP F Earth 109 1,225 NPP FRW Earth 83 1,000 1,900 PFAQRW Concrete 177 1,877 & Earth 210 FRW Concrete 114 960 & Earth 170 FRW Concrete 162 926 290 FNRW Earth 140 1,230 8,300 FRW Earth & Rock 225 1,700 1,910 FAQRW Concrete 68 720 85 FS Earth 77 1,700 470 FR Earth & Rock 140 2,710 680 FR Earth & Rock 122 6,450 480 FRW Earth 154 1,050 NPP F Earth 88 1,420 118 FQRA Earth 90 4,650 450 FARWQ Earth 184 1,610 36 FRWX Earth 41 FRWX Earth 10,925 FRX Earth 6,500 FRX Earth 127 925 123 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 NPP FX Earth 49 61,166 3,280 FSX Earth 104.5 11,890 3,570 FRSX Earth 82 15,400 NPP FX Earth 37 72,844 12,300 FIRSX Earth 192 5,524 3,770 FNRXA Earth 130 9,130 8,240 FRSX Earth 224 6,830 18,700 FRS Earth 97 ].0,600 4,400 FRSWX Earth 115 16,320 7,280 FNRSXA Earth 137 12,850 510 FARSX Earth 91 6,800 15,590 FX Earth & Rock 115 8,890 21,400 FRSX Earth 81 19,483 23,280 FRSX Earth 125 32,888 5,070 FRSX Earth 82 7,570 1,310 FRSWX Rock 164 6,700 A-5 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS (Continued) O. C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Wynoochee WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River WISCONSIN Eau Galle Colorado Red Brazos Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio James Ohio Green Columbia Puyallup Chehalis Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Chippewa North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Ompompanoosuc River Pound River Jackson North Fork, Pound River Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee River Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek Guynabdot River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Eau Galle San Angelo Paris Comanche Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village Haysi Alleghany Pound Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Montesano Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Summersville Sutton Grafton Spring Valley 1952 1967 1963 1967 1968 1965 1957 1961 1960 1960 1961 1950 1963 1979 1966 1961 1942 1953 1972 1977 1952 1977 1970 1979 1965 1960 1938 396,400 189,100 374,200 507,500 630,400 726,400 2,654,300 54,600 71,420 51,067 33,700 38,000 145,700 123,739 11,293 106,000 8,300 106,000 70,000 37,540 631,000 65,400 82,500 203,700 413,800 265,300 287,700 5,440 5,993 4,610 11,460 6,430 7,270 20,300 75 220 290 100 NPP FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth 310 FAQR Concrete & Earth 2,532 FQR Earth & Rock 106 FR Rock 1,600 FAS 225 FR NPP FR 1,150 FSARI 450 1,800 550 823 440 407 270 620 FRW FRWX FQRW FQRW FQRW FANR FARWX FNAR Rock Earth Rock Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Rock Concrete Concrete 1969 43,600 150 FR Earth A-6 128 40,885 96 7,080 86 13,460 80 26,175 200 15,624 140 24,618 100 18,500 265 915 185 1,520 120 2,940 133 1,700 170 1,100 250 960 257 1,172 122 600 235 675 145 3,200 425 700 177 1,700 86 1,080 180 2,048 89 1,400 122 650 310 1,397 390 2,280 220 1,178 230 1,921 122 1,600 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage)' Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Camanche 2 Cherry Valley' Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar 2 New Don Pedro' New Exchequer Oroville' Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook HAWAII Kaneohe Dam IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onondaga OKLAHOMA Altus' Lake Hudson s Grand Lake O' the Cherokees UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville San Joaquin San Joaquin Tuolumne Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Colorado Housatonic Housatonic Connecticut Connecticut Kaneohe Upper Snake Potomac Upper Mississippi Oswego Red Arkansas Arkansas Beaver Winooski Winooski Winooski Big Dry Creek Mokelumne River Cherry Creek Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Yuba River Tuolumne River Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek Pinon Canyon Arroyo East Branch, Naugatuck River Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook Fresno Clements Sonora Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torrington Torrington Winchester Winchester Kaneohe Stream Kaneohe Willow Creek Savage Bear Creek Idaho Falls Western Port Hannibal Onondaga Creek Syracuse North Fork, Red Grand (Neosho) River Grand (Neosho) River Big Wash Jail Branch Waterbury North Branch, Winooski River Altus Locust Grove Disney Milford East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1948 1963 1956 1968 1937 1968 1970 1966 1964 1965 16,250 431,500 268,000 77,000 960 960,000 2,030,000 1,026,000 3,539,000 960 NPP F NPP FRS 475 FS 200 FRS NPP F 1,910 FIRPW 3,520 FISP 1,900 FIR 5,838 FIRSW NPP F Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Concrete Earth & Rock Rock Earth Earth 1964 4,350 NPP FRW Earth 1964 1962 1963 1970 4,350 NPP FR 8,620 NPP F 9,700 10 FR 1,480 NPP F Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth 1981 3,800 26 FR Earth 1979 100,500 364 FIR Earth 1952 20,000 360 FRS Earth & Rock 184 1962 8,700 NPP F 1949 18,200 NPP F 1948 1964 1941 152,429 444,500 2,197,000 6,260 FISR 10,900' FRP 46,500 " FRP 1961 1,200 NPP F 1938 1938 1938 Earth Earth Concrete Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth 12,050 NPP F Earth 37,000 890 FRH Earth 20,300 570 FR Earth NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS: A-Low Flow Augmentation D-Debris Control F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N- Navigation P -Power Q-Water Quality Control R--Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X-Water Conservation and Sedimentation ' Acres of water surface at top of permanent pool. 'Federal Government contributed for flood control storage. ' Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on interim basis. Second and final phase, New Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Francisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 'Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 'Top of power pool. A-7 40 171 315 223 82 645 565 480 770 42 20,038 2,450 2,500 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 1,200 6,850 3,610 92 700 92 73 178 68 100 1,200 940 1,160 76 2,200 184 840 1,050 65 1,450 67 1,782 98 90 147 1,112 4,494 6,565 34 2,814 65 158 115 1,460 1,800 1,525 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Adams Co., Overy Bridge, Little Blue River, NE (Sec 14) ............. Alamosa, CO (Sec 14) .. ................................ Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (Sec 205)............................. Allegheny River, Tionesta, PA (Sec 14) ............................. Alpena, M I (Sec 14).................................... Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO ........... Alum Creek Lake, OH. ................................. Andrew Co., Road T, Nodaway River, MO (Sec 14) ................... Andrew-Holt Co's Bridge, Nodaway River, MO (Sec 14) .............. Ararat River, Mt. Airy, NC (Sec 205) ............................... A rcadia Lake, OK ....................................... ........ Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII), OK, TX, and K S (Stage I) ................................................... Ascalmore-Tippo Items, M S ................ ...................... Asquiroga Bay Shoreline (Guam) (Sec 14) ............................ B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC .............................. Barkers Island, W I (Sec 14) ................ ....................... Bayshore, W I (Sec 14)................. ........................... Beaver Brook, Keene, NH (Sec 205) ................................ Beaver River, Bridgewater, PA (Sec 14) ............................ Beech Fork Lake, WV. ............ ..................... Bettendorf, IA ....................................... Big Brown Creek & Tributary, Prentiss Co., MS ................ Big Sioux River, Harrisburg, SD (Sec 14)........................... Big Sioux River, Plymouth Co., IA (Sec 14) ......................... Big Sioux River, Sec. 32, Plymouth Co., IA (Sec 14) .................. Big Sioux River, Well House, SD (Sec 14) ........................... Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN ........ Big Stone Lake & Whetstone River, MN and SD ..................... Big W ood River, ID (Sec 208)...................................... Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, WI (Sec 205) ........ Blackbird Creek, Burt Co., NE (Sec 14) ............................. Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14) ................... Blackstone River, Millbury, MA (Sec 14).. . ................. Bloomington Lake, MD and WV ................................... Blue River Channel, M O ................ .......................... Boise River, ID (Sec 208) ................. ......................... Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL ................. ....................... Bradford, TN (Sec 208) ................ ........................... Bridgeport, MI (Sec 14) ........................................... Brookville Lake, IN ................. ............................. Brush Bayou, LA ............... ...................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ................................ Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Safety Assurance ................ ......................... Burnsville Lake, WV............. ......... Caesar Creek Lake, OH ........................................... Calloway Branch, TX .. ...... ........................... Candy Lake, OK ................. ................................ Canton Bridge, Trigg Co., KY ................ ..................... Catherine Creek, OR (Sec 208) ................. .................... Cave Run Lake, KY ................. ............................. Central and Southern, FL ................. ........................ Charlevoix, M I (Sec 14) ................... ...................... Chartiers Creek, McKees Rocks & Kennedy TWP, PA (Sec 14) ........ Chatfield Lake, CO .................. ............................. Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL ................................. Chena River Lakes, AK .................. ......................... Chillicothe, OH ...................................... Clear River, Burrillville, RI (Sec 14) ................ ................ Colfax, Palouse River, WA . ........ ...................... Columbus, NE (Sec 205)............ ..................... Conesus Lake, Livonia, NY (Sec 205)............. ........... Cooper Lake and Channels, TX ............. .................... Copan Lake, OK................ ..................... Corte Madera Creek, CA ..... ............. .................. Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (Sec 14).......... 1985 1983 1982 1983 1982 1983 1970 1985 1986 1985 1980 1976 1984 1985 1967 1985 1985 1985 1986 1970 1982 1986 1985 1984 1984 1985 1979 1971 1984 1984 1985 1985 1985 1971 1984 1984 1986 1983 1986 1966 1977 1956 1986 1972 1971 1985 1976 1986 1985 1965 1950 1984 1986 1967 1986 1973 1971 1986 1962 1982 1986 1958 1973 1966 1986 1986 1984 1983 1984 1983 1975 1986 1986 1987 1986 1982 1985 1985 1986 1978 1986 1975 1985 1986 1981 1986 1984 1987 1974 1978 1986 1982 1985 1974 1981 1966 1986 1983 1986 1984 1984 1984 1983 1984 1986 1986 1986 1987 1987 19853 1987 1986 1989 1986 1986 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1986 1987 1987 1988 1986 1985 1987 1987 1986 1986 1984 1994 1985 1986 1984 1987 1984 1980 Indefinite ID Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Chloride Control Local protection Emergency protection Reservoir Shoreline protection Shoreline protection Local protection Streambank protection Reservoir Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection National Recreation Area Local protection Snagging and Clearing Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Reservoir Local protection Snagging and Clearing Snagging and Clearing Local protection Streambank protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection 1989 Dam Safety 1986 Reservoir 1986 Reservoir 1986 Local protection )eferred Reservoir 1987 Streambank protection 1986 Snagging and Clearing 1987 Reservoir 1997 Local protection 1986 Shoreline protection 1987 Streambank protection 1989 Reservoir and Channel Improvement 1987 Shoreline protection 1994 Reservoirs and levee 1986 Local protection 1987 Streambank protection 1984 Local protection 1987 Local protection 1987 Local protection 1992 Reservoir, channel improvement and levees 1985 Reservoir 1989 Local protection 1987 Streambank protection B-1 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Creek Road Bridge, MS ............... .................. Cucamonga Creek, CA....... ................ ........... Cuyahoga River, Akron, OH (Sewerline) (Sec 14) ..................... Cuyahoga Street Bridge, Akron, OH (Sec 14) ........................ D ade County, FL ................. ............................... Darby Creek, PA ........ .............................. Dayton, KY.......... ........................... .... Demonstration Erosion Control, MS ............... ......... .. Devils Lake, ND (Sec 205) .. ............. ................. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel, CA ..................... Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14) ...................... .East Branch, Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel near Huger, SC (Sec 14) .................................... East Bridge, Chagrin River, Baldwin Rd, Kirtland, OH (Sec 14) ....... East Bridge, Chagrin River, SR 615, Kirtland, OH (Sec 14)............ East Lynn Lake, W V ................................... East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet & Jamaica Bay, NY, Part I......................................... ............... East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL ................... ........... El Dorado Lake, KS . ................................... E l Paso, T X .................. ................................... Elizabeth, NJ ................... .................... Elk Creek, Clarksburg, WV (Sec 14) ................................ Elk Creek, Jackson, NE (Sec 14) .............. .................... Elk Creek, Lake, OR.............. ...................... Elk Creek, W illis, NE (Sec 14) ............... ..................... Elkhart, IN (Sec 14) .................. ............................ Ellicott Creek, N Y .................. ............................. Elm Creek, Burt Co., NE (Sec 14) ............... ................... Enderlin, Maple River, ND (Sec 205) ............................... Euclid Creek, OH (Sec 205) .................. ...................... Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ................ .................... Falls Lake, NC........ ................................ Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY ................. ......... (Remainder)... ................ .................... Four Rivers Basin, FL .............. ................... Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS ........ ................ Grays Creek Canal, Shelby Co., TN ................................ Grays Creek, Memphis, TN (Sec 14) .. ........................... Great Falls, MT................. ...................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS .................................. Gulf Street and Trumbull Avenue, Milford, CT (Sec 14) ............... Hanover, Hannapin County, MN (Sec 14) ........................... Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS .............. ................... Holt Co. Bridge, Kimsey Creek, MO (Sec 14) ......................... Hooverson Heights, WV (Sec 14) .......... ................. Humboldt, TN.. .......... ......... ............ Hwy 90, St. Francis River, AR (Sec 14) ..: ..................... Indian Creek, Emerson, IA (Sec 205) ............................... Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI (Sec 14) ........ Joe Pool Lake, TX ............... . .................... John Day River (West), OR (Sec 14) ................................ Johnson Co., Tecum Bridge, Yankee Creek, NE (Sec 14) .............. Johnson Co., Vesta Bridge, Yankee Creek, NE (Sec 14) ............... Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI ................................. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee Dist, IL ........................ Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI (Sec 14) ......................... Kuskokwim River, Bethel, AK (Sec 14) ............................. Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR ................ ........... Lake Darling, Souris River, ND ... .......... ............. Lake Erie, SR 531, Geneva, OH (Sec 14) ............................ Lake Michigan, Cleveland, WI ............. ................... Lake Michigan, Grand Haven, WI (Sec 14) ........................ Lake Michigan, Pt. Washington, WI (Sec 14) ..... ................. Lake Michigan, Waterworks Facility, Cudahy, WI.............. Lake Pontchartrain, LA ..................................... Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (Sec 205)...................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA .............. ................... 1985 1976 1985 1984 1975 1986 1978 1985 1983 1967 1986 1986 1986 1986 1965 1975 1974 1974 1971 1972 1986 1984 1971 1985 1984 1986 1985 1982 1983 1986 1973 1963 1963 1966 1986 1985 1984 1982 1986 1986 1986 1985 1985 1986 1986 1984 1983 1985 1975 1985 1985 1985 1986 1980 1986 1985 1981 1985 1986 1986 1986 1984 1986 1967 1986 1972 1985 1982 1986 1985 1982 1986 1983 1987 1970 1977 1981 1973 1986 1985 1986 1986 1983 1985 1986 1986 1987 1985 1986 1986 1986 1987 1986 1985 1987 1985 1988 1986 1986 1992 1987 1986 Indefinite 1987 1988 1987 1987 1987 1987 1982 1988 1986 1986 Indefinite 1986 1987 1986 1990 1987 1986 1989 1987 1986 1986 1989 1990 Indefinite Indefinite 1990 1987 1986 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1986 1986 1987 1988 1985 1986 1986 1990 1986 1986 1986 1989 1986 1987 1986 1985 1991 1987 1987 1986 1986 1987 Indefinite 1987 1992 Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Shore protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Reservoir Beach nourishment Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Reservoir Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Bridge protection Bank protection Streambank protection Local protection Riverbank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Flood control Streambank protection Streambank protection Flood control Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Reservoir Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection Shoreline protection Shoreline protection Shoreline protection Shoreline protection Local protection Local protection Local protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ..................................... . Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205) ...................................... Leaf & Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS ...................... ... Levee Unit 5, W abash River, IN ................................. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA ........................................... Lewis Branch (Mile 2.0 to 4.0) County Rd, Houston Co., TN ........... Little Blue River Channel, MO .................................... Little Blue River Lakes, MO ................ ................... Little Dell Lake, UT ..................................... Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14) .................. Little MassardCreek, Ft. Smith, AR (Sec 205) . ................. .. Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Sec 205) ................ ......... Long Branch Lake, MO ....................................... Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA (Sec 205) .................. Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA ................ Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging & Clearing) ................. Lytle & Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ................... Mahoning River, Highway 139 A, OH (Sec 14) ....................... Mahoning River, Warren, TWP, OH (Sec 14) ...................... Manistee, MI (Sec 14) ................ ................... ...... Mankato and N. Mankato, MN ................ ................. Maple River, MI (Sec 208) ......................................... Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME (Sec 14) ................ .......... Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS ................ ................. Martins Fork Lake, KY .......................... .......... Mauvaise Terre, IL............. ... .................... McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL ......................... Medicine Bow River, Elk, MT, WY (Sec 14) .......................... M erced County Streams, CA ....................... ............... Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, WA (Sec 14) .................. Middle River at Argyle, MN (Sec 205) ................. .......... Milan, IL ............................................ Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (Sec 14) .............. .............. Mill Creek, OH... ..................................... Miller Co. Roadway, Osage River, MO (Sec 14) ................. .... Minnesota River at Le Sueur, MN (Sec 14) . ....................... Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO .................. Miss. River Levees....................................... Monongahela River, Granville, WV (Sec 14) ......................... Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ................... ......... Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA ................ ................. Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE (Sec 14)............... ............. . Mudline to Pineville, MS ................ ... ................ .... Murder & Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL ...................... Muskingham River Lakes, OH ................ ................. Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance) .................. ......... ........ New London, CT ............................................... New Orleans to Venice, LA ................... .. ................. Newark, OH......................................... Nonconnah Creek at Lamar Ave., Memphis, TN ................... Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT (Sec 14) ................ ....... Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS ...................... Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (Sec 14) ............................. Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14) ................ ............. Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) .............. ........ Owyhee River, OR (Sec 208) ................................. .. . Paintsville Lake, KY .......................................... Panola-Quitman Item C, MS ................................... Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE ........................ Patoka Lake, IN ................ ............................ Paw Paw, MI (Sec 205) ................... ..................... Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (Sec 205) ................ .......... Pearl River, MS ............ ........ .. .... .......... Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS ..................................... Perkiomen Creek, PA ......................................... 1970 1982 1986 1964 1981 1986 1975 1978 1986 1986 1983 1985 1973 1986 1961 1985 1973 1985 1986 1984 1971 1984 1986 1986 1973 1985 1979 1986 1986 1986 1985 1980 1986 1981 1985 1985 1948 1928 1986 1986 1983 1984 1984 1986 1976 1982 1978 1969 1976 1986 1984 1986 1986 1983 1984 1986 1973 1984 1972 1972 1985 1982 1984 1985 1986 1976 1985 (mod.) 1985 1987 1969 1986 Indefinite 1987 1987 1989 1990 1987 1984 1984 1987 1980 Indefinite 1987 Indefinite 1988 1987 1985 1985 1987 1985 1986 1990 1985 1985 1987 1987 1978 1982 1987 1985 1986 1986 Indefinite 1986 1988 1987 1987 1998 1986 1986 1986 1986 Indefinite (4) 2008 1987 Indefinite 1987 1987 1985 1985 1988 1988 1985 1987 1984 1984 1983 1974 1978 1987 1995 1986 Indefinite 1989 1987 1984 1987 1987 1984 1986 1986 1990 1986 1989 1985 1987 1987 1985 1987 1987 Reservoir and channel improvement Local protection Bridge protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoirs Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Snagging and Clearing Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Shoreline protection Local protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank protection Streambank protection Reservior Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Reservoirs Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Main Line Levees Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Major rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local protection (hurricane) Local protection Local protection Bank protection Local protection Streambank protection Shoreline protection Local protection Local protection Snagging and Clearing Reservoir Local protection Reservoirs Reservoir Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO ............................... Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) .................... Platte River, Ashland, NE (Sec 14) ................ .............. Platte River, Brady, NE (Sec 14) ................................... Platte River, Hanson Lake, NE (Sec 14) ............................ Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (Sec 14) ................ .............. Plum Creek, Penn Hills, PA (Sec 14) ................ ............. Point Place, OH ................ . .................. ........... Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205) ................ .................... Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ................ .............. Prairie Du Chien, WI .......................................... Presque Isle Peninsula, PA ....................................... Pt. Leflore, M S ................ ................... ............ R. D. Bailey Lake, W V........... ................................ Rapidan River, Orange, VA (Sec 14) ........................... Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections ................ . . . ................. .......... Ray Roberts Lake, TX ......................................... Redbird Creek, Holt Co., NE (Sec 14) ................................ Red River below Denison Dam, TX ................ ............. Red River Emergency Bank Protection ......................... Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (Sec 205) .................. Red River of the North at Halstad, MN (Sec 205) .... ................ Roberto Clemente Park, Pittsburgh, PA (Sec 14) .................... Rockford, IL (Kent Creek) ................ ..................... Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (Sec 205).................. ............... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA .......................... Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA .................. Sacramento River Flood Control, CA ................ ............ Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA ................ Saginaw River, M I ................. .............................. Saline Co. Tuxedo Bridge, Big Blue River, NE (Sec 14) ............... Salt Creek, Lincoln, NE (Sec 14) ................ ................ San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ......................... San Gabriel River, TX ...................................... ..... San Jacinto River Levee & Bautista Creek Channel, CA .............. Sandy Creek, Jackson, TN (Sec 14) ................ . ............. Sardis Lake, OK ...................................... Saxis Island, Accomack Cnty, VA . . ................. ............ Saylorville Lake, IA ............... ............... .............. Scotts Creek, Newberry, SC (Sec 205) ................ ........... Scottsville, VA ..................... .. ........................ Seneca River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Seneca Falls, NY (Sec 14) ..... Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND (Sec 14) ................... ....... Sicily Island, LA, Levee ................ . ...................... Siena Center, Racine, WI (Sec 14) ................ ............... Skiatook Lake, OK .............................................. Smithville Lake, MO ............................................ Sope Creek, Marietta, GA ................... ...................... Souris River, Velva, ND (Sec 14) ................ ................ South Creek, Martinsburg, NE (Sec 14) ................ .......... South Fork, Big Nemaha River, Dubois Bridge, NE (Sec 14) .......... South Fork, Boise River, ID (Sec 208) ............................. South Platte River, Goodrich, CO (Sec 14) .......................... South Platte River, Kersey, CO (Sec 14) ............................ South Platte River, Merino, CO (Sec 14) .................. ... ..... South Platte River, Morgan Co., CO (Sec 14) ........................ South Platte River, Weldona, CO (Sec 14) ............. ............. South River, Conway, MA (Sec 14) ................................. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY .............................. Steele Bayou, MS ............................................. St. Francis Basin ................................... ......... Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV ..................... .............. Stratmoor Hills, Colorado Springs, CO (Sec 14) ..................... Stuart, Patrick Co., VA (Sec 205) ................. .............. 1977 1973 1986 1985 1984 1986 1983 1982 1982 1975 1979 1975 1985 1967 1983 1965 1975 1984 1948 1971 1985 1983 1983 1979 1979 1963 1963 1918 1949 1965 1986 1985 1957 1973 1960 1983 1976 1986 1965 1986 1986 1986 1986 1983 1981 1974 1974 1986 1986 1985 1985 1984 1985 1984 1985 1985 1984 1986 1974 1966 1938 1977 1983 1986 1985 1985 1986 1984 1986 1975 1986 1986 1985 1984 1984 1979 1986 1985 19801 1985 1983 1977 1982 1985, 1982 1985 1986 1985 1983 (4) 1984 1985 1991 1987 1986 1986 1987 1984 1987 1985 1993 1986 1989 1986 1986 1987 Indefinite 1991 1986 1986 1987 1987 1986 1984 1988 1984 1991 Indefinite 1989 1988 1992 1986 1986 1991 19842 1985 1984 1986 1987 Indefinite 1987 1988 1987 1987 2010 1982 1986 1986 1987 1987 1987 1985 1985 1987 1986 1986 1987 1987 1987 1989 1995 1999 1988 1984 1987 Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Non-structural local protection Beach replenishment Streambank protection Reservoir Streambank Erosion Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Streambank protection Reservoir Streambank protection Reservoir Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Reservoir Reservoir Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Tributary levees & channels Reservoir Streambank protection Local protection B-4 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14) ................ ......... Sweetwater River, CA ................. . .................. ...... Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS ............................. Taylors Bayou, TX ................... ........................... Taylorsville Lake, KY ............................................ Tennessee River (Mile 254) City Duck, Sheffield, AL ................. Tennessee River (Mile 67.0) Paris Landing State Park, TN ............ Tennessee River (Mile 650) Downtown Is. Airport, TN ............... Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA 11 ... ....................... Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) .................... Tombigbee River, Hwy. 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL ................. Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS .......................... Trout Run, Portage Borough, PA (Sec 14) ........................ Truchas Creek, Ft Summer, NM (Sec 14) ......................... Turner Creek, Corinth, MS ..................................... Twenty-mile Creek, Airport Rd., Prentiss County, MS (Sec 14) ........ Tynes Branch, Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS ...... Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205) ................... Upper Yazoo Projects, MS ................ ..................... U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (Sec 14) ....................... U.S. Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (Sec 14) ..................... U.S. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (Sec 14) .................... Valley Creek, AL (Sec 14) ..................................... Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD (Sec 14) ..................... Vermillion River, WWTP, SD (Sec 14) ................ ........... Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ................................. Walnut Creek, CA ............... .................. Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (Sec 14) ............... W aterloo, IA ...................................... ........... Webster Co. Bridge 14710, Beaver Creek, NE (Sec 14) ................ Webster Co. Bridge 23015, Elm Creek, NE (Sec 14) .................. Webster Co. Bridge 23025, Beaver Creek, NE (Sec 14) ................ Webster Co. Bridge 33425, Elm Creek, NE (Sec 14) .............. Webster Co. Bridge 43430, Beaver Creek, NE (Sec 14) ................ West Magnesia Canyon Channel, CA (Sec 205) .................... West Makinster Road, Wilson River, OR (Sec 14) .................... West Papillion Creek, Douglas Co., NE (Sec 14) ................... West Tennessee Tributaries .................................... Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205) ................... ....... White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) ................................ White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205) ........................... Wigle Creek, Homer, NE (Sec 14). . .......... ......... ......... Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA .......... ...................... Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN (Sec 14) .................. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR .................. William H. Harsha Lake, OH ................ ................... Winona, MN....... ............... ................... Wolf Cr., Hwy 45, Prentiss Co, MS (Sec 14) . ........................ Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ........................ Wyoming Valley, PA ............................................. Yatesville Lake, KY .............................................. Yonkers, NY ................ ... ................. .............. Zoological Gardens, Racine, WI .................... ............. 1984 1984 1986 1982 1974 1986 1986 1986 1983 1962 1986 1965 1984 1983 1986 1984 1986 1986 1976 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1968 1964 1986 1973 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1985 1985 1985 1960 1983 1984 1984 1985 1986 1985 1938 1970 1979 1984 1953 1983 1964 1975 1983 1986 1983 1984 1984 1987 1985 1985 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 (4) 1984 1986 1986 1986 1986 1978 1985 1962 1976 1984 1986 1988 1987 1992 1989 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1988 Indefinite 1984 1984 1987 1985 1987 1987 2013 1986 1985 1986 1986 1986 1986 1988 1990 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1986 1987 1986 1986 2003 1984 1986 1986 1986 1990 1986 Indefinite 1987 1987 1985 1986 1986 Not scheduled 1985 1984 Streambank protection Local protection Bridge protection Local protection Reservoir Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Riverbank protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Bank protection Streambank protection Bridge protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Sewerline protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Streambank protection Tributary channels Local protection Local protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Reservoir Local protection Streambank protection Local protection Rehabilitation of levee system Reservoir Local protection Shoreline protection 1 Granger Dam & Lake Georgetown - complete FY 83 2 South Fork - Construction deferred indefinitely, work on Reevaluation Report only 3 Completion of Stage I (Truscott facilities) only. Stage II (Ross facilities) indefinite 4 Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primarily of improvements to existing local interest channel and levees. B-5 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne Lock and Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 - Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Armistead I. Selden Lock and Dam Wm. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam (new lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 William O. Huske Lock and Dam Central and Southern Florida S561 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock S-308B S-310 Chicago Harbor, IL Chicago Lock Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Cross-Florida Barge Canal Inglis Lock, Dam and Spillway Eureka Lock and Dam Harry H. Buckman Lock 81.82 Claiborne, AL 142.32 Camden, AL 254.42 Benton, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA 107.6' Chattahoochee, FL 154.3' Columbia, GA 182.86 Fort Gaines, GA 11.5' Great Bridge, VA 10.6* Deep Creek, VA 33.2' South Mills, NC 1.5' Berwick, LA 72.5' New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.61� Coffeeville, AL 213.2 '0 Demopolis, AL 261.1 '0 Eutaw, AL 338.1'0 Tuscaloosa, AL 347.0 '0 Holt, AL 365.1'� Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 99.0 Browns Landing, NC 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Frostproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 32.0 Sebring, FL 25.0 Sebring, FL 16.0 Okeechobee, FL 12.0 Okeechobee, FL 38.7 Port Mayaca, FL 0.0 Clewston, FL 0.0 Chicago, IL 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 292.0 Umatilla, OR 168.6" Inglis, FL 20.0 Sparr, FL 90.4 Palatka, FL 84 84 84 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 82 82 82 600 600 600 360 - 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 450 450 450 30 45 45 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 33 25 88 16 16 16 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 14 19 18 13 13 13 12 11 10 11 11 10 10 11 14 13 13 Movable Movable Movable Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Movable Movable Movable 3,160' 9,900' 14,9623 1,393 1,436 876 780 1,140 916 984 950 5,924 620 13,371 72 530 3 167 16' None 52 300 12 12' 12' None 52 300 12 12' 12' None 45 307 75 97 36 162 9 9 9' None 8 Fixed 1973 60.5 1969 103.1 1974 88.0 193420 193420 1927 1927 1928 1930 1931 1938 1957 1963 1963 1932 1940 1941 1950 175 1913 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None 110 110 110 95 110 110 600 600 600 460 600 600 33 40 22 28 64 68 13 13 13 12 19 13 13 13 13 12 13 13 Movable Fixed Movable Fixed Movable Fixed 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 100 100 100 7.8 9.7 6.2 5.9 9.4 6.9 9.6 9.8 46.7 28.5 85.0 12 90 6 50 6 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 1914 7.1 21 200 1,185 1,485 1,832 700 1,138 1,170 90 600 3 14 14 None 40 40 40 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 56 50 200 200 300 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 400 60 11 9 9 2 666 7 65 14 5 9 12 9 66 666 66 14 13 80 600 4 23 76 86 86 86 84 84 84 500 675 675 675 600 600 600 C-1 65 88 110 75 28 20 20 32 15 15 15 18 14 14 9 12 9 6 6666 66 14 13 Fixed Fixed Fixed 275 229 220 None None None None None None None Movable Movable 23 None 24 15 15 20 15 15 Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable None 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 1975 1965 1915 1917 1935 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 1964 1964 1977 1980 96.6 47.9 77.0 8.9 18.1 42.7 32.0 24.0 20.0 28.0 10.0 14.0 7.0 9.0 4.0 5.0 .5 200 200 200 200 200 200 12 125 100 100 100 20 30 30 30 30 30 30 100 50 1939 .15 21 470 2,680 1938 8,735 1957 5,900 1968 7,365 1953 5,100 1968 3,830 1971 1972 47.5 27 25.0 14 76.0 14 64.0 14 11.0 12 12 21.2 12 300 250 250 250 150 150 150 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam 30.6 Kuttawa, KY Cheatham Lock and Dam 148.7 Ashland City, TN Old Hickory Lock and Dam 216.2 Old Hickory, TN Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir 313.5 Carthage, TN Fox River, WI DePere Lock 7.1 DePere, WI DePere Dam 7.2 DePere, WI Little Kaukauna Lock 13.0 DePere, WI Little Kaukauna Dam 13.1 DePere, WI Rapide Croche Lock 19.2 Wrightstown, WI Rapide Croche Dam 19.3 Wrightstown, WI Kaukauna Fifth Lock 22.8 Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna Fourth Lock 23.1 Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna Third Lock 23.3 Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna Second Lock 23.4 Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna First Lock 23.6 Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna Dam 24.0 Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna Guard Lock 24.0 Kaukauna, WI Little Chute combined Lock Lower 25.4 Little Chute, WI Upper 25.4 Little Chute, WI Little Chute Second Lock 26.4 Little Chute, WI Little Chute First (Guard) Lock 26.5 Little Chute, WI Little Chute Dam 26.6 Little Chute, WI Cedars Lock 27.3 Little Chute, WI Cedars Dam 27.4 Little Chute, WI Appleton Fourth Lock 30.7 Appleton, WI Appleton Lower Dam 30.9 Appleton, WI Appleton Third Lock 31.3 Appleton, WI Appleton Second Lock 31.6 Appleton, WI Appleton First Lock 31.9 Appleton, WI Appleton Upper Dam 32.2 Appleton, WI Menasha Lock 37.8 Menasha, WI Menasha Dam 37.8 Menasha, WI Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock 19.08 Intracoastal City, LA Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River: Lock and Dam No. 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY Lock and Dam No. 2 63.1 Calhoun, KY Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock 92.612 New Orleans, LA Harvey Lock 98.312 Harvey, LA Algiers Lock 88.012 Algiers, LA Bayou Boeuf Lock 93.3 Morgan City, LA Bayou Sorrel Lock 131.013 Plaquemine, LA Port Allen Lock 228.512 Port Allen, LA Vermilion Lock 162.713 Abbeville, LA Calcasieu Lock 238.513 Lake Charles, LA Brazos River Floodgates 404.1'13 Freeport, TX Colorado River East Lock 444.8 Matagorda, TX West Lock 444.8 Matagorda, TX Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam 153.8 Troy, NY Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam 80.2 Beardstown, IL Peoria Lock and Dam 157.7 Peoria, IL Starved Rock Lock and Dam 231.0 -Utica, IL Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL Marseilles Dam 247.0 Marseilles, IL Dresden Island Lock and Dam 271.5 Morris, IL Brandon Road Lock and Dam 286.0 Joliet, I1 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam 326.5 Chicago, IL Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir 30.0 Alanson, MI 110 110 84 84 36 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 34 800 800 400 400 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 57 26 60 59 9 7 8 9 10 10 10 11 9 11 11 14 7 10 8 9 10 10 8 84 600 11 14 14 14 10 8 9 77767 688 7 8 677 7 13 Movable 12 Movable 10 Movable 13 Movable 12 10 10 96 666 9 66 7 8 966 8 16 16 None 84 600 12 12 11 Fixed 84 600 14 15 12 Fixed 75 75 75 75 56 84 56 75 75 640 425 797 1,158 800 1,198 1,200 1,205 9' 10' 10' 6' 10' 45 3' 6' 75 1,200 75 1,200 317 12' 137 13' 14' 137 11' 13' 15' 31' None 12' None 13' None 137 None 14' None 14' None 11' None 13' None 15' None 5' 15' 157 None 5' 15' 15' None 9,959 1964 801 1959 3,605 1957 1,138 1973 1936 Movable 986 1929 1938 Movable 588 1926 1934 Movable 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 Movable 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 Movable 562 1932 1888 Movable 654 1933 1907 Movable 549 1934 1900 1901 1884 Movable 691 1940 1899 Movable 401 1937 118.1 9 67.5 9 97.3 9 71.9 9 5.9 6.2 3.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.0 0.7 3.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 5.1 28.3 401 1968 482 1956 54.0 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 200 1923 1935 1956 1956 1952 1961 1934 1950 1943 1954 1954 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1,495 1917 2.2 14 200 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 1,000 10 11 19 24 22 34 40 2 16 16 17 19 17 18 12 14 13 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 12 Movable 14 Movable 15 None 14 Movable 1,066 1939 536 1939 1,280 1933 1933 819 1933 1,616 1933 2,373 1933 1933 257 1960 77.5 9 73.3 9 13.6 9 26.9 9 24.6 14.5 9 5.1 99 6.9 9 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 4.0 5 30 C-2 150 150 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 12 125 12 12 16 16 12 12 16 16 12 150 125 150 150 125 125 200 200 125 12 125 12 125 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1985 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marmet Lock and Dam London Lock and Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 524 Lock and Dam No. 624 Lock and Dam No. 724 Lock and Dam No. 824 Lock and Dam No. 924 Lock and Dam No. 1024 Lock and Dam No. 1124 Lock and'Dam No. 1224 Lock and Dam No. 1324 Lock and Dam No. 1424 Lake Washington Ship Canal Hiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norrell Lock and Dam Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murray Lock and Dam Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-Jetta Taylor Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 13 W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webbers Falls Lock and Dam Chouteau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No. 26 Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and bam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 Lock and Dam No. 15 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 31.1 Winfield, WV 67.8 Marmet, WV 82.8 London, WV .8 Ellis Grove, IL 4.0 Carrolton, KY 31.0 Lockport, KY 42.0 Gest, KY 65.0 Frankfort, KY 82.2 Tyrone, KY 96.2 High Bridge, KY 117.0 High Bridge, KY 139.9 Camp Nelson, KY 157.5 Valley View, KY 176.4 Ford, KY 201.0 Irvine, KY 220.9 Ravenna, KY 239.9 Willow, KY' 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 10.3 Arkansas Post, AR 13.3 Arkansas Post, AR 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 Grady, AR 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 86.3 Redfield, AR 108.1 Little Rock, AR 125.4 Little Rock, AR 155.9 Conway, AR 176.9 Morrilton, AR 205.5 Russellville, AR 256.8 Ozark, AR 292.8 Fort Smith, AR 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 336.2 Sallisaw, OK 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK 401.2 Muskogee, OK 421.4 Inola, OK 185.1"4 Granite City, IL 202.91' Alton, IL 241.4' Cap Au Gris, MO 273.4'" Clarksville, MO 301.21' Saverton, MO 324.9" Quincy, IL 343.216 Canton, MO 364.2" Keokuk, IA 410.51' Burlington, IA 437.11' New Boston, IL 457.21" Muscatine, IA 482.916 Rock Island, IL 493.116 LeClaire, IA 493.31' LeClaire, IA 522.5'" Clinton, IA 556.7'5 Bellevue, IA 583.0'" Dubuque, IA 615.1'" Guttenberg, IA 647.9'" Lynxville, IA 679.2" Genoa, WI 702.5'" Dresbach, MN 56 56 56 360 360 360 28 24 24 18 18 18 12 Movable 834 1937 36.7 9 300 12 Movable 707 1934 15.0 9 300 12 Movable 707 1934 7.8 9 300 84 600 32 18 11 Movable 130 1973 35.0 9 225 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 889 6 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 15 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 7 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 6 Fixed 80 760 26 33.5 29 Movable 28 123 26 16 16 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 30 20 20 14 17 18 18 16 19 54 34 20 20 48 30 21 21 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 14 18 19 15 15 15 Fixed 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 14 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 15 Movable 14 Movable 16 Movable 14 Movable 424 400 465 543 556 413 350 257 362 472 208 240 248 248 1839 1939 1844 1844 1844 1891 1897 1900 1907 1907 1906 1910 1915 1917 235 i916 4,677 42,073 6,110 5,745 7,455 8,890 3,930 1,580 1,505 1,815 2,480 4,725 7,400 7,230 4,370 11,490 14 Movable 1,629 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 27.0 11.0 23.0 17.2 14.0 20.8 22.9 17.6 18.9 24.6 19.9 19.0 9.1 9.6 17.0 34 150 3.0 36.9 15.8 20.3 21.8 17.3 30.5 21.0 28.6 51.3 36.0 26.8 16.6 30.4 34.8 20.2 23.7 110 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 100 110 110 110 80 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 600 600 600 600 600 1,200 600 600 600 600 360 320 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 24 24 15 15 10 10 10 38 10 89 16 16 11 11 11 9 11 89 11 8 19 16 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 10 Movable 1,725 10 12 Movable 1,296 12 Movable 4,280 14 Movable 1,024 12 Movable 1,066 12 Movable 2,144 13 Fixed 4,434 14 Movable 1,350 13 Movable 921 12 Movable 1,099 11 Movable 1,203 11 11 14 Movable 1,343 13 Movable 1,066 13 Movable 849 13 Movable 1,278 12 Movable 763 13 Movable 811 14 Movable 935 12 Movable 940 1938 1939 1940 1938 1938 1936 1913 1i37 1939 1937 1934 1922 1939 1939 1938 1937 1937 1937 1937 1937 38.5 32.0 27.8 23.7 18.3 21.0 46.3 26.6 20.1 25.7 10.4 29.2 34.2 26.3 32.1 32.8 31.3 23.3 11.8 C-3 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 150 150 200 200 200 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Mississippi River (Continued) Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No. 6 714.315 Trempealeau, WI Lock and Dam No. 5A 728.515 Winona, MN Lock and Dam No. 5 738.115 Minneiska, MN Lock and Dam No. 4 752.815 Alma, WI Lock and Dam No. 3 796.91 ' Red Wing, MN Lock and Dam No. 2 815.216 Hastings, MN Lock and Dam No. 1 847.6 ' Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam 853.3'" Minneapolis, MN Upper Lock and Dam 853.9'" Minneapolis, MN Monongahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 11.2 Braddock, PA Locks and Dam No. 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA Locks and Dam No. 4 41.5 Monessen, PA Maxwell Locks and Dam 61.2 Maxwell, PA Locks and Dam No. 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA Locks and Dam No. 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA Morgantown Lock and Dam 102.0 Morgantown, WV Hildebrand Lock and Dam 108.0 Morgantown, WV Opekiska Lock and Dam 115.4 Morgantown, WV Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 18.4 Mound City, IL Locks and Dam No. 52 42.1 Brookport, IL Smithland Locks and Dam 35.3 Smithland, KY Uniontown Locks and Dam 135.0 Uniontown, KY Newburgh Locks and Dam 204.9 Newburgh, IN Cannelton Locks and Dam 260.3 Cannelton, IN McAlpine Locks and Dam 374.2 Louisville, KY Markland Locks and Dam 449.5 Markland, IN Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam 544.8 Chilo, OH Greenup Locks and Dam 640.0 Greenup, KY Gallipolis Locks and Dam 701.8 Hogsett, WV Racine Locks and Dam 743.5 Letart Falls, OH Belleville Locks and Dam 777.1 Reedsville, OH Willow Island Locks and Dam 819.3 Waverly, WV Hannibal Locks and Dam 854.6 New Martinsville, WV Pike Island Locks and Dam 896.7 Warwood, WV New Cumberland Locks and Dam 926.6 Stratton, OH Montgomery Island Locks and Dam 949.3 Industry, PA Dashields Locks and Dam 967.7 Glenwillard, PA Emsworth" Locks and Dam 974.8 Emsworth, PA Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W. P. Franklin Lock and Control Structure 15.1 Stuart, FL 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 93.6 LaBelle, FL 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 56 600 600 600 600 600 600 500 400 400 7 17 13 Movable 6 18 13 Movable 9 18 12 Movable 7 17 13 Movable 8 17 14 Movable 12 22 13 Movable 12 16 15 38 13 8 Fixed 38 13 10 56 400 25 14 10 Movable 56 400 49 16 14 Fixed 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 56 110 56 50 50 50 56 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 720 360 360 600 600 600 600 1,200 600 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 600 360 600 360 600 360 9 16 16 Fixed 9 16 16 8 12 12 Fixed 8 12 12 17 20 11 Movable 17 20 11 20 21 15 Movable 20 21 15 15 11 10 Fixed 19 15 10 Movable 17 18 15 Movable 21 14 15 Movable 22 18 14 Movable 12 15 10 Movable 12 15 10 Temporary Lock 12 15 11 Movable 12 15 11 Temporary Lock 22 34 12 Movable 22 34 12 22 34 12 Movable 22 34 12 16 32 16 Movable 16 32 16 25 38 13 Movable 25 38 13 37 49 12 Movable 37 19 11 37 19 11 35 50 15 Movable 35 50 15 30 45 15 Movable 30 45 15 30 45 15 Movable 30 45 15 23 18 15 Movable 23 18 15 22 37 15 Movable 22 37 15 22 37 15 Movable 22 37 15 20 35 15 Movable 20 35 15 21 38 17 Movable 21 38 17 21 17 18 Movable 21 17 18 21 17 15 Movable 21 17 15 18 16 15 Movable 18 16 15 10 13 18 Fixed 10 13 18 18 17 13 Movable 18 16 13 250 13 14 12 Movable 250 2 10 11 None 250 11 12 11 Movable 400 3 13 - Movable 893 1936 14.2 9 NS 682 1936 9.6 9 NS 1,619 1935 14.7 9 NS 1,367 1935 44.1 9 NS 365 1938 18.3 9 NS 822 1931 32.4 9 NS 1948 574 1932 5.7 9 NS 1917 188 1956 0.6 9 100 3,584 1963 3.8 9 100 748 1951 12.6 9 300 195321 670 1907 17.7 9 300 190721 535 1932 19.7 9 300 193221 460 1964 23.8 9 300 1964 610 19252' 5.8 9 300 560 19252122 11.2 9 300 410 1950 6.0 9 300 530 1959 7.4 9 300 366 1964 7.0 9 300 3,978 1929 23.7 9 300 1980 3,073 1928 35.8 9 300 1969 3,560 1980 99.7 9 300 3,516 1975 69.9 9 300 2,272 1975 55.4 9 300 1,965 1972 116.3 9 400 8,627 1961 75.3 9 300 1921 1930 1,395 1963 95.3 9 300 1963 9 300 1,756 1962 95.2 9 300 1962 1,287 1962 61.8 9 300 1,132 1937 41.7 9 300 1,202 1970 33.6 9 300 1,206 1969 36.4 9 300 1,128 1973 35.3 9 1,000 1,098 1972 36.0 9 300 1,306 1965 29.9 9 300 1,315 1961 22.7 9 300 1,379 1936 18.4 9 300 1,585 1929 7.1 9 300 1,717 1921 6.2 9 300 170 1941 15.1 8 80 1953 15.6 8 90 104 1937 15.6 8 90 1,150 1965 7.9 8 90 C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Old River, LA Old River Lock Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) Calion Lock (Ouachita River) Felsenthal Lock (Ouachita River) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Waterway Lock 1 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam St. Mary's River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock Savannah River, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY" ' Kentucky Lock and Dam Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam Auxiliary Lock Main Lock Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS Gainesville Lock and Dam Aliceville Lock and Dam Columbus Lock and Dam Aberdeen Lock and Dam Lock A and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Lock C and Spillway Lock D and Spillway Lock E and Spillway Bay Springs Lock and Dam Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Guntersville Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Nickajack Lock and Dam Chickamauga Lock and Dam Watts Bar Lock and Dam Fort Loudon Lock and Dam Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Clinch River) 304.0 Simmesport, LA 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 281.7 226.8 29.4" Pearl River, LA 40.7" Bush, LA 43.9" Sun, LA 43.8 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 9.7 Pasco, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 107.5 Pomeroy, WA 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 187.2 Augusta, GA 22.4 Gilbertsville, KY 206.7 Hamburg, TN 206.7 Hamburg, TN 49.1 Gainesville, AL 89.8 Aliceville, AL 117.6 Columbus, MS 140.4 Aberdeen, MS 154.1 Amory, MS 159.3 Smithville, AL 174.0 Fulton, MS 181.4 Fulton, MS 189.7 Belmont, MS 194.9 Tupelo, MS 259.4 Florence, AL 259.4 Florence, AL 274.9 Florence, AL 274.9 Florence, AL 349.0 Guntersville, AL 349.0 Guntersville, AL 424.7 Chattanooga, TN 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 529.9 Breedenton, TN 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 1,200 35 11 11 None 84 84 84 84 65 65 65 600 600 600 600 310 310 310 30 18 18 18 12 18 13 ' 18 26.7 15 11 10 10 10 14 Movable 13 Fixed 13 Movable 13 Movable 1963 450 1972 400 1972 350 1984 350 1984 10 None 10 None 10 None 84 685 36 22 13 Fixed 86 600 4 13 13 None 86 86 86 86 80 110 80 80 675 675 675 675 100 98 98 100 800 22 1,200 22 1,350 22 1,350 22 15 15 15 15 31 32 24 24 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 1951 1951 1951 12 125 92.2 106.2 50.3 55.2 11.1 3.2 13.2 9 9 9 9 7 77 100 100 100 100 80 80 80 550 1984 44.2 9 200 1961 1.5 13 120 2,790 1962 3,800 1969 2,670 1970 3,200 1975 31.9 28.7 37.2 32.0 1943 1968 1914 1919 14 14 14 14 27 250 250 250 250 56 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 16.2 9 90 110 600 56 11 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 184.3 9 300 110 600 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 52.7 9 300 110 1,000 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 52.7 9 300 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 60 110 60 110 60 110 60 60 60 75 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 292 600 400 600 400 600 360 360 360 400 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 94 94 48 48 39 39 39 49 58 72 54 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 13 11 13 15 13 13 13 10 12 12 13 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 18 Movable 18 Movable 18 Movable 18 Movable 18 None 13 Bulkhead 11 Bulkhead 13 Bulkhead 13 Bulkhead 13 Tainter 12 Tainter 11 Tainter 14 Tainter 12 Tainter 12 Tainter 13 Tainter 15,460 1978 14,790 1979 10,040 1981 10,640 1984 - 1985 - 1985 - 1985 - 1985 - 1985 10,640 1985 3,728 1959 3,728 1927 5,738 1963 5,738 1962 3,837 1965 3,837 1939 3,763 1967 5,654 1940 2,646 1942 3,687 1943 1,072 1963 49.1 40.7 27.8 22.8 13.7 14.7 7.4 8.3 5.2 64.5 15.5 15.5 74.1 74.1 75.7 75.7 46.3 58.9 72.4 49.8 38.2 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300" C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Lift at Miles Width Available Normal Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Pool Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth In Vicinity Chamber Full Width Level Upper Lower Type' (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. 1 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 20 6 8 None 1872 6 150 Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 .210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 3 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 4 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 .4 Guard Lock 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 23.6 6 NS ' Fixed: crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable: includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2 Above mouth of Mobile River. 3 Includes length of earth dikes. 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River. " From mouth of Chattahoochee River. SAbove Norfolk, VA. 7 With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. " From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. ' Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 'o From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. " From mouth of St. Johns River. 2 Above Head of Passes. '3 From New Orleans, LA. "4 Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. "Above the Ohio River. '6 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. "7 From mouth of West Pearl River. '"Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. '300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 20 Dates shown represent replacement structures. 21 Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 22 Dam was rebuilt in 1959. 23 Old 110' X 358' lock replaced in 1957. 24 Inoperable, caretaker status September 7, 1982. 25 Inoperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. C-6 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project AIWW-Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC ......... Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ........................ Barnegat Inlet, NJ ................. .... ................. Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA ...................... Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL .......... Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Sec 107) ............ Calumet Harbor & River, IL and IN ......................... Calumet-Sag. Mod., Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1...... Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ........... Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) .................. Columbia River, Ilwaco, WA (Sec 107) .. .................. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ................ ........ Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA ................. Fisherman's Wharf Area, CA............................. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ...................................... .............. Gallipolis Locks and Dam, Ohio River ............. .......... Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH .................................. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD ........................... Irondequoit Bay, NY ................ ................... Kalama Turning Basin, WA (Sec 107) .................. Kaskaskia River, IL ....................................... Krebs Lake, MS (Sec 107) .................................. Lock and Dam 26 Replacement IL and MO .................. Lockport Lock, Illinois Waterway, IL ....................... Locks and Dam 52, IL and KY ................ ............. Locks and Dam 53, IL and KY ................ ........... Lorain Small Boat Harbor, OH (Sec 107) .................... Lower Thorofare, Somerset County, MD .................... M anitowoc Harbor, W I .................................... Marseilles Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ............. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR ...... Mekoryuk, AK (Sec 107) .................................. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers .......... Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA .... .................... Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to mouth .................... Montgomery Locks & Dams, Ohio River, PA ................. Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal Waterway) ... Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI ................ ............ New York Harbor, NY and NJ .............................. Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ............. Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.) .................... Ocean City Harbor and Inlet, MD ..................... Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA .................... Port Everglades Harbor, FL ........ .;. .................... Port Ontario Harbor, NY .................................. Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA .......... Rockport Harbor, Rockport, MA (Sec 107) ................ R'ota Harbor, Northern Marianas (Sec 107) ................. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ........... San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA .................... 1974 1982 1985 1985 1983 1984 1964 1955 1962 1967 1985 1972 1980 1984 1984 1985 1986 1986 1984 1986 1966 1983 1974 1983 1979 1979 1986 1986 1981 1985 1963 1986 1910 1958 1912 1983 1984 1985 1976 1965 1966 1983 1964 1979 1986 1974 1986 1982 1948 19861 Indefinite 1985 1985 1991 1992 1988 1987 1966 Indefinite 1968 Indefinite 1966 1986 1968 Indefinite 1986 1986 1974 1983 1984 1968 1980 Incremental 1969 1967 1936 1984 1985 1986 1986 1990 1985 1987 Indefinite 1995 1988 1987 1987 1986 1986 1984 1991 1987 1985 1987 1987 1987 1984 1988 1989 1986 2000 1984 Indefinite 1987 1991 1987 1993 1987 Indefinite 1985 1994 1987 1988 Indefinite 1987 1985 1994 Indefinite Replacement of existing bridges Dredging and breakwater Jetty realignment and dredging New larger lock Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Dredging and breakwater Dredging and channel, widening and deepening Channel improvements and relocation Replacement of existing locks and dams 43-45 inclusive Deep draft channel widening and deepening, deferred anchorage construction Dredging, deepening channel Dredging Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Breakwater Protection of a National Natural Landmark Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam Breakwaters, channel excavation, wetland mitigation Beachfill, stone revetment Dredging and breakwater Turning basin Lock, dam and channel Dredging, navigation channel Lock and dam Major rehabilitation of lock Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Major rehabilitation of locks and dam Breakwaters Stone breakwater, jetty Dredging and breakwater Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Locks and dams Breakwater Regulating works Dredging and jetties Navigation and bank stabilization complete. Wildlife mitigation awaiting authorization Major rehabilitation of locks & dams Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation Breakwater repair Collection and removal of drift Replacement of locks and dams 46 and 47 Deep draft channel, deepening and deferred anchorage const. Rehabilitation of south jetty Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment Dredging Breakwaters, channel excavation Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment Channel improvement and deepening Dredging and breakwater Deep draft channel, widening and deepening Dredging and breakwater D-1 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ............ ............. Santa Cruz Harbor, CA. ................. ................ Siuslaw River and Bar, OR ......... .. .................... Smith Island, MD (Sec 107) ................ ............ Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY ................. Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ......... Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) ...................... Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS .............. Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY ......... 1971 1985 1983 1982 1971 1980 1976 1973 1965 1986 1982 1980 1985 1985 1970 Wallisville Lake, TX ................ .................. 1967 Indefinite Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1987 Sand bypass system 1986 Extending jetties 1983 Channel cut with breakwater 1987 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 1986 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1987 Dredging 1985 Dredging and locks and dams 1986 Replacement of locks and dams 48 and 49 Indefinite Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1 Walter Jones and Coinjock Bridges completed; the three remaining bridges have not been funded. D-2 APPENDIX E MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Height Length Project River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type Z (Feet) (Feet) Albeni Falls, ID Pend Oreille Newport, WA 1,153,000 1952 Allatoona Lake, GA Etowah Cartersville, GA 670,000 1950 Barkley Dam & Cumberland Grand Rivers, Lake Barkley, KY KY & TN 2,082,000 1964 Beaver Lake, AR White Eureka Springs, AR 1,952,000 1963 Big Bend Dam (Lake Sharpe), SD Missouri Chamberlain, SD 1,883,000 1964 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR Ouachita Mt. Pine, AR 2,768,000 1953 Bonneville L&D Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Columbia Bonneville, OR 537,000 1938 Broken Bow Lake, OK Mountain Fork Broken Bow, OK 1,368,230 1968 Buford Dam Lanier, GA Chattahoochee Buford, GA 2,554,000 1956 Bull Shoals Lake, White Mountain Home, AR & MO AR 5,408,000 1952 Clarence Cannon Dam Salt Perry, MO 1,428,000 1983 Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Carters, GA 472,756 1975 Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork Lancaster, TN 2,092,000 1948 Cheatham L&D, TN Cumberland Ashland City, TN 104,000 1952 Chief Joseph Dam (Rufus Woods Lake), WA Columbia Bridgeport, WA 593,100 1955 Clarks Hill Lake, GA & SC Savannah Augusta, GA 2,900,000 1952 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC Santee St. Stephen, SC 2,560,000 N/A Cordell Hull L&D, TN Cumberland Carthage, TN 310,900 1973 Cougar Lake, OR S. Fork McKenzie Blue River, OR 219,000 1963 Dale Hollow Lake, TN & KY Obey Celina, TN 1,706,000 1943 Dardanelle L&D, AR Arkansas Dardanelle, AR 486,200 1969 DeGray Lake, AR Caddo Arkadelphia, AR 831,900 1969 Denison Dam (Lake Texoma), TX & OK Red Denison, TX 5,312,300 1944 Detroit Lake, OR, including Big Cliff Lake, OR North Santiam Mill City, OR 461,000 1953 Dworshak Dam & N. Fork, Reservoir, ID Cleanwater Orofino, ID 3,453,000 1972 Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Eufaula, OK 3,825,400 1964 Fort Gibson Lake, OK Grand (Neosho) Ft. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 1950 Fort Peck Lake, MT Missouri Glasgow, MT 18,909,000 1938 Fort Randal Dam (Lake Francis Case), SD Missouri Lake Andes, SD 5,574,000 1953 Garrison Dam (Lake Sakakawea), ND Missouri Riverdale, ND 24,137,000 1954 Gavins Point Dam (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Missouri Yankton, SD 504,000 1956 Green Peter Lake, OR, including Foster Lake, OR Middle Santiam Sweet Home, OR 491,000 1967 Greers Ferry Lake, AR Little Red Heber Springs 2,844,000 1962 Harry S. Truman Dam & Res. Osage Warsaw, MO 5,202,000 1982 Hartwell Lake, GA & SC Savannah Hartwell, GA 2,842,700 1961 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork OR Willamette Oakridge, OR 356,000 1961 Ice Harbor L&D (Lake Sacajawea), WA Snake Pasco, WA 417,000 1962 Jim Woodruff Dam (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL Appalachicola Chattahoochee, FL 367,300 1957 John Day L&D (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA Columbia Rufus, OR 2,500,000 1968 John H. Kerr Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Roanoke Boydton, VA 2,750,300 1952 Robert F. Henry L&D, AL Alabama Benton, AL 234,200 1972 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones Nashville, TN 652,000 1967 1955 42,600 1950 74,000 1966 1965 1965 130,000 112,000 468,000 1956 75,000 1938 1970 1957 1953 1985 1975 1951 1958 1956 1953 1985 1974 1964 1949 1965 1972 1945 1954 1973 1964 1953 1944 1954 1956 1,076,600 100,000 86,000 340,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 2,069,000 204,160 s 280,000 84,000 100,000 25,000 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 118,000 400,000 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 430,000 1957 100,000 1967 1964 19824 1962 1962 100,000 96,000 160,000 344,000 30,000 1962 603,000 1957 30,000 1969 2,160,000 1953 204,000 1975 68,000 1970 28,000 42,600 NFPR C 74,000 FPRW C 130,000 NPFR CE 112,000 FPSR CE 468,000 FPRIW E 75,000 FPRW E 1,076,600 NPR C 100,000 FPWSR E 86,000 NFPW E 340,000 FPR C 58,000 FNPRSW CE 500,000 FPRW ER 135,000 FPR CE 36,000 NPR C 2,273,160 PIR C 280,000 NFPRSW CE 84,000 PW CE 100,000 NPR CE 64,600 NFPRI ER 54,000 FPR C 124,000 NPR C 108,000 FNPRS E 175,000 FPSRN E 118,000 NFPRI C 1,060,000 PNFR C 90,000 ENPS E 67,500 FP CE 185,250 NFPRIW E 320,000 NFPRIW E 430,000 NFPRIW E 100,000 NFPRIW E 100,000 PFNIR C 96,000 FPRS C 160,000 FPRW CE 344,000 NFPRS CE 30,000 NFPRI GE 603,000 NPRI CE 30,000 NPRW CE 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 204,000 FPRW CE 68,000 NPRW CE 28,000 FPRW CE E-1 90 1,055 190 1,250 157 9,959 228 2,575 95 10,570 235 1,100 122 2,690 225 2,750 192 5,400 258 2,256 138 1,700 450 1,950 250 2,160 75 801 220 4,300 200 5,680 86 876 93 1,306 445 1,738 200 1,717 68 2,683 243 3,400 165 17,200 382 1,528 717 3,300 114 3,200 110 2,990 251 21,026 165 10,700 210 11,300 74 8,700 340 1,380 243 1,704 96 5,000 204 17,852 304 2,150 130 2,790 67 6,150 161 5,900 144 22,285 101 14,962 147 2,716 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER IN OPERATION SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community in Capability in Useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Height Length ect River Vicinity (acre-feet)' Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (Feet) (Feet) stone Lake, OK Arkansas Tulsa, OK 1,737,600 1964 1968 70,000 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,600 el River Lake, KY Laurel London, KY 435,600 1973 1978 61,000 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 y Dam, Lake ocanusa, MT Kootenai Libby, MT 5,809,000 1972 1975 525,000 840,000 FPR C 420 3,055 e Goose L&D Ike Bryan), WA Snake Starbuck, WA 565,000 1970 1970 810,000 810,000 NPRI CE 160 2,670 Lookout Point Lake, including Dexter Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR Lower Granite L&D, WA Lower Monumental L&D, WA McNary L&D - Lake Wallula, OR & WA Millers Ferry L&D, AL Narrows Dam - Lake Greeson, AR New Melones Lake, CA � Norfolk Lake, AR & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Oahe), SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, TN Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Robert S. Kerr L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX St. Mary's River, MI Snettisham, AK 7 Stockton Lake, MO Table Rock Lake, AR & MO Tenkiller Lake, OK The Dalles L&D (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George L&D, GA & FL Webbers Falls L&D, OK West Point Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Wolf Creek Dam (Lake Cumberland), KY 483,000 1954 465,000 1977 484,000 1975 Willamette Middle Fork, Willamette Rogue Snake Snake Columbia Alabama Little Missouri Stanislaus North Fork Missouri Cumberland Arkansas Roanoke Arkansas Angelina Great Lakes Speel Sac White Illinois Columbia Chattahoochee Arkansas Chattahoochee Brazos Cumberland Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1955 135,000 1977 49,000 1975 810,000 1969 810,000 1954 980,000 1970 75,000 1950 25,500 1979 300,000 1944 80,550 1962 595,000 1957 100,000 1973 100,000 1954 14,000 1971 110,000 1966 52,000 1952 18,400 1973 46,700 27,000' 1973 45,200 1959 200,000 1953 34,000 1957 1,806,800 1963 130,000 1973 60,000 1975 73,375 1954 30,000 1952 270,000 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 3,600 810,000 NPRIF CE 146 3,200 810,000 NPRI CE 135 3,800 1,625,000 NPRI CE 183 7,300 75,000 NPRW CE 90 11,380 25,500 FPRW C 183.5 941 300,000 FIPRW ER 625 1,560 163,000 FPRS C 216 2,624 595,000 NFPRIW E 245 9,300 100,000 NPR CE 98 3,605 100,000 NPR C 58 2,480 14,000 FPR C 220 892 110,000 NPR E 75 7,230 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 18,400 NP Control Gate 73,700 P C' 18 338 45,200 FPRW CE 128 5,100 200,000 FPR CE 252 6,423 34,000 FP E 197 3,000 1,806,800 NPR CR 300 8,875 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,695 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 ' Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 3 Chief Joseph Additional Units & Operating Units 1-16 4 All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for their testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. ' Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 7 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administration ' Crater Lake Unit ' Weir for Long Lake Nomenclature for Project Functions D-Debris Control P -Power F-Flood Control R--Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I -Irrigation S -Water Supply N-Navigation W-Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-2 Proj Keys Laur Libb Ko Littl (La Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomeroy, WA Kahlotus, WA 376,000 1969 Umatilla, OR 1,550,000 1953 Camden, AL 331,800 1969 Murfreesboro, AR 407,900 1950 Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 1978 Norfolk, AR 1,983,000 1943 Pierre, SD 23,337,000 1959 Hendersonville, TN 545,000 1954 Ozark, AR 148,400 1969 Bassett, VA 318,500 1951 Sallisaw, OK 525,700 1970 Jasper, TX 3,997,600 1965 Sault Ste. Marie, MI - 1855 Juneau, AK 352,400 Stockton, MO 1,674,000 1969 Branson, MO 3,462,000 1958 Gore, OK 1,230,800 1952 The Dalles, OR 53,000 1957 Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 1963 Webbers Falls, OK 170,100 1970 West Point, GA 604,500 1975 Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA ...... 1974 1981 1991 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO............ 1966 1985 1987 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ................................... 1965 19821 19871 FRPW 160,000 160,000 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, TTPI ........ 1985 1987 1987 P 2,000 2,000 New Melones Lake, CA2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 1966 1979 1988 DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC ............................ 1975 1985 1991 FRP 600,000 600,000 Copper River, Charleston Hbr, SC................ 1977 1985 1986 NWD 84,000 84,000 Snettisham, AK .............................. 1967 1989 1989 P 73,700 27,000 1 All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for either testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on November 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanislaus River. Remaining construction consists of recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. KEY D--Redevelopment F -Flood Control I -Irrigation N--Navigation P -Power R -Recreation S -Water Supply W-Fish and Wildlife F-1 FLOOD DAMAGES SUSTAINED AND PREVENTED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Month Oct 85 Oct 85 Nov 85 Feb 86 May 86 May 86 Aug 86 Sep 86 Estimated Total OTHER MAJOR WEATHER EVENTS AND DAMAGES Event Number Tropical Cyclones Major Blizzard Major Drought Tornadoes 8 1 1 770 Lives Lost 200* 11 0 40-50 Estimated Total (Exclusive of Floods) Damages Sustained ($000) 2,092,000* 3,000,000 900,000 194* $5,000,000* * 62 deaths and $1,065,000,000 were flood related and included in the above table. G-1 Location Puerto Rico Gulf Coast Appalachia West Coast Missouri Pennsylvania Wisconsin Middle America All Floods in U.S. Lives Lost 55 11 63 15 3 92 12 Damages Sustained ($000) 65,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 450,000 50,000 23,000 30,000 3,000,000 208 $6,000,000 DISTRIBUTION BY REGION FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FY 1986 10-Year Average (1976-1985) $000 $000 New England Mid-Atlantic Gulf and South Atlantic Ohio Tennessee Great Lakes Upper Mississippi Souris-Red-Rainy Missouri Arkansas-Red-White Lower Mississippi Rio Grande Texas and Gulf Colorado Great Basin California Columbia-North Pacific Alaska Hawaii Total 700 357,700 41,800 633,600 600 28,100 113,800 19,000 860,500 174,700 9,336,100 87,100 208,200 0 16,300 13,910,900 1,521,700 6,800 200 $27,317,800 152,568.1 405,474.6 49,228.6 479,068.3 280.5 17,453.4 63,165.0 11,889.7 337,899.9 104,561.4 6,471,918.8 38,845.2 88,596.0 39,826.0 4,401.5 508,145.0 570,333.0 3,466.8 712.9 $9,347,834.7 G-2 Region DISTRIBUTION BY DISTRICT FY 86 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS* (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) District $000 Vicksburg Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Kansas City Omaha Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul New England Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Louisville Nashville Pittsburgh Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Sacramento Los Angeles San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa Total 672,489 385,870 8,277,781 0 682,870 177,643 281,154 3,383 71,283 1,845 17,545 1,000 10,526 104,809 26,934 665 6,828 1,483,652 10,891 27,116 173,056 70,837 570 389,765 220 157 25,000 0 0 16,617 13,916,300 1,220 9,700 87,641 179,934 28,234 59,073 115,162 $27,317,770 *Includes Corps-controlled projects and Corps-supported emergency operations. G-3 DISTRIBUTION BY STATE FY 86 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS* (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Total $000 0 6,828 0 466,429 13,910,920 502 25 000 220 20,757 68,235 46,287 106,878 114,694 16,110 8,478,185 0 109,102 437 10,411 22,083 360,552 717,926 19,531 72,187 14,000 350 121 87,139 80,610 4,034 4,324 97,966 61,857 1,394,551 224,267 25,000 0 157 811 10,749 208,333 2,300 1,362 87,703 98,808 354,265 127 10,637 $27,317,770 *Includes Corps-controlled projects and Corps-supported emergency operations. G-4 FY 86 FLOOD DAMAGES INCURRED Property State ($000) Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico Total * 3,000+ 2,240+ 402,000 166+ * * 7,275+ 2,000+ * 2,005+ 104,705 + 2,500+ 45,307 + 181,700+ 25+ 1,515,250+ 5,000+ * 21,500+ 405,000+ 1,501+ 651+ 155,000+ 38,674+ 28,482+ 20,650+ 5,962+ * * 30,820+ 1,990+ 315+ 10,000+ 802,250+ 33,900+ 71,540+ * 3,070+ 6,665+ 15,150+ 34,100+ 479,000 * 800,000 + 20,351 + 600,000 + 80,000 + 250+ 67,369 Acres Inundated (Thousands of Acres) 90 1,800+ 1 236+ 75+ 50+ 371 540+ 1,500 602+ 5+ 55+ 1+ 1+ 3,000+ 1,407+ 184+ 915+ 2+ 750+ 1,800+ 350+ Over $6 billion Lives Lost 0000 14 0000000 1 0 11 0 1 0 12 6 2 07 2 0 1 00 241 0 121 11 0301 25 10 22 0 38 2 0 55 (127 mudslide victims) 208 *Property damage unavailable but flooding occurred G-5 ANNUAL REPORT FY 86 OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: LMK LMM LMN LMS MR+T MRK MRO NAB NAN NAO NAP NCB NCC NCD NCE NCR NCS NED NPA NPP VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ALASKA DISTRICT PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10 Absecon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Accotink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass. (NAN) 2-36 Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Adams Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Adldn Branch, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-8 Agat Harbor, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-1, 36-6 AIWW-Mooring Basins, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 AIWW-Tidal Lock in Snows Cut, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-28, 10-38 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 NPS NPW ORD ORH ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN SAS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL SWT SEATITLE, WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVISION HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., DIVISION NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLESTON, S.C., DITRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DIVISION LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-18, 10-29, 10-40, 10-45 Alameda Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Alamo Lake, Ariz. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) (NAO) 5-22 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-1, 17-8, 17-10 Alford, Green River, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Aliso Creek Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Allatoona Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-30, 10-40 Allegany, N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17, 26-21, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa., Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-24 Allegheny River, Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13 Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 I-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-43 Alloway Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-14, 3-21 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42-3 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Almond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 11-18, 12-18, 12-19 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Alpine, Tex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) 8-1, 8-11, 8-12 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-14 Alteration to Rosiclare, Ill. (ORD) 22-3 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-45 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Altus Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-2, 25-12, 25-16 Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Amazon Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Atchison,.Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Athalia, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Athens, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Atlantic City, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Atlantic Coast of Maryland and Assateague Island, Va. (NAB) 4-20 Atlantic Coast of N.J. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets (NAN) 2-36 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (NAO) (SAW) (SAN) (SAS) (SAJ) 5-2, 5-14, 5-18, 5-22, 6-2, 6-18, 6-22, 7-2, 7-9, 7-11, 8-2, 8-11, 8-13, 9-2, 9-25, 9-32 Au Sable Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Auburn, N.Y., Owasco Outlet (NCB) 32-37 Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Augusta, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Augusta Levee, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Augusta Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Aurora, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Avoca, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-18 Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.) (SAW) 6-10, 6-15, 6-20 Bachelor Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Back Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Bagaduce River, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-43, 1-45 Bailey, R.D., Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-18 Bainbridge, N.Y. (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Baker Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Baker River, Warren, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-25, 9-32 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-12, 1-27, 1-48 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. (NAB) 4-3, 4-22, 4-27 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (NAO) 5-2, 5-14, 5-18, 5-25 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Memphis District (MR+T) 42-39, 42-42 Bank Revetments and Dikes: New Orleans District (MR+T) 42-30, 42-32 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Vicksburg District (MR+T) 42-34, 42-36 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-11, 18-21 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith (SWL) 18-21 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Bar Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-14 Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-6, 36-7 Barbourville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 Bardwell Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-15, 16-19 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-15, 3-18 Barnegat Light, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 I-2 INDEX Barnett Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-24 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-27, 1-48 Barren River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14, 24-27 Bartley, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Bashbish Brook, Copake, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Bass Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-46 Bass Harbor Bar, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bassett Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-4, 27-19 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Batavia and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Bath, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Baton Rouge Harbor, La. (LMN) 11-14 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp), La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-29, 42-50 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Baudette Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Bay City Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 Bay River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Bayard, W. Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-14, 12-16 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-17 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. (LMK) 12-16, 12-18, 12-19 Bayou Bonfouca, La. (LMN) 11-14 Bayou Choupique, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-14, 42-28, 42-54, 42-58 Bayou Coden, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-26, 10-32 Big Sandy Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-15, 16-19 Big Sandy River, W. Va. and Ky., including Levisa and Tug Forks (ORH) 25-19 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Big Slough - Mayo Ditch, Ark. (MR+T) 42-57 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-4, 23-9 Big Spring, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-4, 27-19 Big Stranger Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Big Suamico River, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-33, 31-46 Big Sunflower River, Miss. (LMK) (MR-T) 12-14, 42-51 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Big Thompson River, Johnstown (MRO) 21-20 Big Timber Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Big Walnut Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Big Wash, Milford, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Big Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Billings, Montana (MRO) 21-18 Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-4, 10-26, 10-33, 10-45 Biloxi Harbor, East Harrison County Canal, Miss. (SAM) 10-5, 10-26, 10-33 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Binghamton, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Birch, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Birch Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-13, 19-17 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR+T) 42-53 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-53 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La. (LMN) 11-16 Black Bayou Reservoir, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Minn. (NCS) 27-5, 27-19 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Black River, Ark. - Mo. (SWL) 18-16, 18-17 Black River, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Black River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Black River, Wis. (NCS) 27-23, 27-25 Black River, Butler County Road 607, Mo. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11 Black River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-33, 31-46, 31-63 Black River Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Black River Lake, Wis. (NCS) 27-25 Black River (North Bend), Wis. (NCS) 27-27 Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Black River (Port Huron), Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-18, 32-24, 32-39 Black Rock Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33 Black Rock Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-49 Black Walnut Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Black Walnut Point, Md. (NAB) 4-36 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-5, 10-26, 10-33, 10-47 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Blackbird Creek near Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 I-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Blackfoot River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Blackfoot River, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Blackstone, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. (NED) 1-10, 1-23, 1-47 Blackstone River, Millbury, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-23, 1-27, 1-35, 1-48 Blackwater Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Blackwater River, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Blackwater River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-22 Blaine Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-12 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 Blind Slough Diking District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Block Island, Harbor of Refuge, RI (NED) 1-53 Bloomington Lake, Md. and W. Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32 Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-11, 3-17 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11, 18-22 Blue River Basin (Kansas City District) (MRK) 20-17 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13 Blue River Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Bluestone Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-16 Bluff Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) 41-1 Bodega Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Bodie Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-51 Boeuf River, La. (LMN) 12-14 Bogachiel River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Boggy Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-15, 16-19 Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Boise Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Boligee Canal, Boligee, Ala. (SAM) 10-13, 10-28, 10-38 Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-28 Bolles Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-33, 31-46 Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-26, 10-34, 10-42, 10-45 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, N.D. (NCS) 27-24 Bonnet Carre Spillway, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-56 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-2, 37-17, 37-24, 37-28, 37-31, 37-37, 37-51 Bonpas Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Bonum Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Boone County, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Booneville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Boston Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-52, 1-53 Boswell Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Bowman, Leland, Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Bradford, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Bradford, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Bradley Lake, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Bramwell, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Branford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Branson Cove, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. (NEi) 1-45 Braymer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington (SWG) 15-27 Brea Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Breton Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Brevard County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-29, 9-40 Brevoort Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Bridge Alterations Authorized Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-15 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-9 Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-38, 1-45, 1-53 Bridges, Columbia River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Bridgewater, Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Brilliant, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Bristol Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33, 1-38 Broad Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Broad Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Broad Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-14, 5-18 Broad Creek River, Del. (NAB) 4-33 Broadkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Broadwater Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Broadway Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-7, 8-11, 8-15 Brockway, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Brockway Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Broken Bow Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-17 Bromley, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Bronx River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27, 2-37 I-4 INDEX Brookfield Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Brooklyn, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Brookport, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Brookville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Brookville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14, 24-27 Broward County, Fla., Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-18, 9-29, 9-40 Brown, Clarence J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Browns Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33, 2-37 Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina-South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-27 Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-3, 8-6, 8-11, 8-13 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO. (MRK) 20-9 Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Buckhannon, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Buckhannon River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Buckhorn Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-6, 24-14, 24-27 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bucksport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Buena Vista, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Buena Vista, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Buffalo, Wyo. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-25 Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Fork, Ferry Location, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-18, 32-25 Buffalo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-19 Buffumville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Buford Dam, Ga. (SAM) 10-22 BUll Run, Pa. (NAB) 4-36 Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-13, 18-24 Bullocks Point Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Bunker Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Burbank-Eastern System, Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Burbank-Western System (Lower) Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Burbank-Western System (Upper) Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Burgettstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Burlington, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Burlington, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Burlington Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Burlington Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Burns Small Boat Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-15 Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. (NCD) 30-2, 30-6, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14, 30-15 Burnsville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-16 Bush, Alvin R., Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Butler, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. (NAN) 2-36 C Cache Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-28, 42-53 Cache Creek Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Cache River Diversion, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Cache River Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-29 Caddo Lake, La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-11, 12-17 Cadet Bayou, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Cadle Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Caesar Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-6, 24-15, 24-27 Cagles Mill Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-6, 24-15, 24-27 Cahaba River, Ala. (SAM) 10-42 Cairo, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Calabash Creek, N.C. (SAN) 7-15 Calapooya River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Calaveras River and Little John Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif. (SPK) 35-5, 35-23 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (LMN) 11-14 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. (LMN) 11-14 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (LMN) 11-14 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La. (LMN) 11-14 Caledonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 California (Cincinnati) Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 California Debris Commission (CDC) 44-1 Calion, Ark. (LMK) 12-13, 12-16 Calloway Branch, Hurst, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana (NCC) 30-2, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14, 30-15 Calumet River Bridges, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Camas Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Cambridge Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 I-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Camden Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Camelsback Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Camp Ground Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Camp Perry, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 Campbells Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Canal Point, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Canapitsit Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-25, 9-32, 9-42 Candy Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-13 Cane River, La. (LMN) 11-14 Caney Fork River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Canisteo, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Cannelton, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Cannon, Clarence, Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-8, 14-10, 14-12 Canoe Creek, Henderson, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Canton, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Canton, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Canton Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-3, 19-9, 19-14, 19-17 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio (ORH) 25-22 Canyon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-15, 16-19 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-14, 5-18 Cape Cod Canal, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33, 1-53 Cape Fear River, N.C., above Wilmington (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-30 Cape Florida State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Girardeau, Mo., Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Henry Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-18 Cape Lookout, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Cape May City, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Cape May Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Carbon Canyon Dam and Channel (SPL) 33-24 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Carlyle Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-20, 6-31 Carr Fork Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-42 Carrabelle, Fla. (SAM) 10-44, 10-45 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Carrollton, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Carters Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Carters Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-19, 10-29 Caruthersville Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-5 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine (NED) 1-38 Carvins Creek, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Cascadia Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Caseville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Caseyville, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Cassville Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Castine, Maine (NED) 1-22 Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Castlewood Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Cathance River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Catherine Creek, Oreg. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11, 39-17 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Cathlamet, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-18 Cattlettsburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Cave Run Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Cave-In-Rock, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Cecil M. Harden Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cedar Point, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Cedar Point Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Cedar River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Cedar River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Cedars Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Celina Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-6, 23-9, 23-18 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-21, 9-30, 9-40, 9-47, 9-48, 9-49, 9-50, 9-51 Central City Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Chambersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries, (NPP) 37-49 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Channel Connecting York River, Va. with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-23 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 I-6 INDEX Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-32 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to Deep Water in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-23 Channel Improvements for Flood Control and Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River (NPP) 37-49 Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Channel to Liberty, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Channel to Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-34 Channels in the Straits of MacKinac (NCE) 31-62 Chapel Hill, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Chaplin River, Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal (MR+T) 42-50 Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act) (MRK) 20-17 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) (MRK) 20-17 Charles River Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-36 Charleston Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-2, 7-9, 7-11, 7-15, 7-17 Charlestown, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-33, 31-46 Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-32 Chartiers Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-28 Chaska, Minn. (NCS) 27-5, 27-19 Chatfield Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-38 Chattanooga, Tenn. and Rossville, Ga. (ORN) 23-13 Chattooga Dams and Lakes, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Cheat River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Cheatham Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-33, 31-46 Cheesequake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La. (LMN) 11-14 Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-12, 38-26 Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, Mass. (NED) 1-9 Chena River Lakes, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-12 Cheney Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-18 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Cherry Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13, 21-19 Cherryfield, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Chesapeake, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Chesconessex Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Cheshire, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Chester, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Chester River, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Chester River, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Chester River at Chester, Pa. (NAP) 3-13 Chetco River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-24, 37-31 Chewaucan River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Chicago Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14, 30-15 Chicago River, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14 Chicago River, Ill. (North Branch) (NCC) 30-6, 30-10 Chickamauga Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Chicopee, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-45, 1-49 Chicopee Falls, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Chief Joseph Dam-Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Chignik, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-16, 25-22 Chilo, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Chincoteague Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-14, 5-18 Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-16 Choctawhatchee Bay to Pensacola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-35 Choctawhatchee Bay to West Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-35 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-42 Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Chouteau Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-16 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Chowan River, N.C. (NAO) 5-23 Chowan River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cibolo Creek, Tex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Cincinnati, Ohio (ORL) 24-20, 24-22, 24-24, 24-25, 24-29 Cincinnatus, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 City Creek Levee, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 City of Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 I-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Claiborne County Port, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Claiborne Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-19, 10-30 Clallam Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clallam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clanton, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Claremont Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-8, 14-10, 14-12 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, Ark. (LMM) 13-6 Clarington, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Clark Fork River, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-11, 8-15, 8-17 Clarkson, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Clarksville, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatskanie River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Clatskanie River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatsop County Diking District 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clear and Burnt River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11 Clear Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-14, 15-25 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Clear River, Burrillville, R.I. (NED) 1-10, 1-23, 1-27, 1-36, 1-48 Clearwater Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11, 18-24 Clearwater Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Clearwater River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clesson Brook, Buckland, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-3, 32-18, 32-26 Cleves, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Clewiston, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Clifton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Clifty Creek Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Clinch River, Tenn., and Va. (ORN) 23-13 Clinton, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Clinton, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Clinton Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Clinton Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Clinton Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13 Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-33, 31-46 Cloverport, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Clyde, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Coal Grove, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Coal River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Coan River, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro Breakwater, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) 45-1 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Cobscook Bay, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cocheco River, N.H. (NED) 1-38, 1-43 Cochiti Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-8, 17-10 Cochrane, Wis. (NCS) 27-27 Cockrells Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (NPS) 38-26 Cohansey River, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-14, 3-15, 3-18 Cohasset Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) 52-1 Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-15, 3-18, 3-21 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Colfax, Wash. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Colliers, W. Va. (ORP) 26-28 Collinsville, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Colonial Beach, Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32 Colorado River, Matagorda, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-27 Colorado Springs, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Columbia, La. (LMK) 12-13, 12-16 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-24, 37-31, 37-45 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 I-8 INDEX Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-2, 39-11, 39-16 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-30 Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River, Ilwaco, Wash. (NPP) 37-5, 37-24, 37-33 Columbia River Treaty Entities 49-2 Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board 49-2 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Columbia Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20, 21-21 Columbus, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Compo Beach, Westport, Conn. 1-42 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Conchas Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 Concordia, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Conemaugh River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 Conesus Lake, Livonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-16, 32-22 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Coney Island Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. (NAB) 4-19, 4-36, 4-39 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-4, 32-18, 32-27 Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. (NED) 1-38 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. (NED) 1-11, 1-23, 1-48 Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-4, 1-25, 1-33, 1-45, 1-53 Connecticut River, Comish, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Connecticut River, North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-43 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-43 Connecticut River, Walpole, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Connell, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Conoho Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 50-1 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-6 Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27, 6-28 Conway County Drainage - Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, - 8, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-16, 16-5, 16-15, 16-19 Cooper River, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-9, 7-12 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Cooper River Seismic Modification, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-9, 7-12 Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data Board 31-30, 49-2 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33 Coos Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-24, 37-33 Coosa River Navigation, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Copan Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-14, 19-17 Copes Corner Lakes, New York (NAB) 4-37 Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33, 37-44 Coralville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Coraopolis, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Corbin, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. (ORN) 23-13 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Cordova Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-11 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Corea Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Coming, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Coming-Monkey Run, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-4, 31-33, 31-46 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula (SWG) 15-27 Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-25 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Corsica River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-3, 35-6, 35-23, 35-28 Cortland, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Cottonwood Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-21, 35-27 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Cottonwood River, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 I-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Cottonwood Slough Pumping Plant, Ill. (LMN) 13-6 Cotuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Cougar Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-28, 37-37, 37-47, 37-49 Council Bluffs, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-19, 21-21 Council Grove Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-14, 19-17 County Road Bridge Over Leaf River, Miss. (SAM) 10-14 Courtenay Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-23, 1-30 Covington, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Cow Castle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Cowanesque Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44, 37-48 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts 2, 13, and 15, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-23, 37-39, 37-41 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Cowpens Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Coyote Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPK) 35-34, 35-35 Crabtree Creek and Tributaries, Wake County, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Crabtree Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Craig Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Crane Creek State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-39 Cranes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-14, 5-18 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (Floodway) (SWA) 17-7 Crescent City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Criehaven Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Crisfield Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Crooked Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 Crooked Creek Lake - Levee, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Cross-Florida Barge Canal (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-32, 9-42, 9-43 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Crystal River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cucamonga Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Cuckold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Cuivre River, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Cumberland, Ky. (ORN) 23-18 Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32, 4-39 Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-2, 23-9, 23-11, 23-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Cunninghill Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Current River, Ark. - Mo. (SWL) 18-16 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Curwensville Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Cushman-Mapleton Channels Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-14, 12-14 Cypress Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Cypress Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 D Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-18, 9-29, 9-40 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-29, 9-40 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Dallas Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Dam "A" Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19 Dam Neck Disposal Area, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Dam Safety Program, New York District (NAN) 2-20 Damariscotta River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Dana Point Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Danbury, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 Dansville and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Danville, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Dardanelle Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-13, 18-20 Darien Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Dashields Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-3, 22-7 Data Collection and Management Division, 53-1 Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-27, 10-34, 10-45 Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Davenport Center Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) (NCD) 29-7 David D. Terry Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-19 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Davis, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Davis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 I-10 INDEX Day, John, Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 Day, John, River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-27, 37-36, 37-40, 37-44 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Dayton, Ky. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-24, 24-29 Dayton, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Dayton, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18 Daytona Beach Side Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45 De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, S.D. (MRO) 21-17 Deep Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. (NAO) 5-23 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Deep Fork River, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Deep River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Deep River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-16 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Deer Island Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-38 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 DeGray Lake, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 DeKalb, Ill. (NCR) 29-16 Delaware Coast Protection, Del. (NAP) 3-11, 3-17 Delaware Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-16 Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-15, 3-18 Delaware River at Camden, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Delaware River at East Branch, N.Y. (NAP) 3-13 Delawiare River at Pennsville, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-15, 3-18 Deleware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-24 Delphi, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Dennis Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Depere Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Depoe Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-33, 37-39, 37-42, 37-45 Dequeen Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-23 Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 Derby, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Deschutes River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Detour Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-34, 31-47 Detroit Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-37, 37-47, 37-49 Detroit River, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-34, 31-47, 31-58, 31-63 Devils Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5, 27-19 Devil's Swamp, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-29 Dewey Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-16 Dickey Lake, Maine (NED) 1-45 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-12, 18-23 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahlkiakum County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Diking Districts 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking Districts 2, 3, and 5, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking Improvement Districts 2 and 13, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-12 Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-11, 40-15 Dillon Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-16 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Dismal Swamp Canal (Deep Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-22 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills, N.C.) (NAO) 5-22 Dively Drainage - Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Dodge City, Kans. (SWT) 19-17 Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-34 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dorena Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Double Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Double Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Douglas Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Dover, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Dresden Island Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. (LMM) 13-6 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Drury Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Dry Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 I-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-17 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPK) 35-24, 35-34, 35-35 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Dry Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Dry Run, Iowa (NCS) 27-24 Dubois, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Dubuque, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Dubuque Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Duck Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Duck Island Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Duck Point Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Duck River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis. (NCE) 31-5, 31-34, 31-47 Dune Road, Southampton, N.Y. (NAN) 2-40 Dungeness River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22, 38-26 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-28 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Duval County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-29, 9-40 Duxbury Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18 Dyersburg, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) (LMM) 13-6 Dymers Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Eagle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Eagle Creek Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Eagle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 East Barre Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex. (SWG) 15-27 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 East Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 East Branch Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 East Canada Creek, Dolgeville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 East Fork, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Lynn Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-17 East Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 East Muddy Creek, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13, 21-21 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-34 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 East Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-19 East Poplar Bluff - Poplar Bluff, Mo. (SWL) 18-17 East Rainelle, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 East River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-22, 2-27 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-31 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) (NAN) 2-36 East Sidney Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 East Weaver Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-12 Eastchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Eastern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, La. (MR+T) 42-15, 42-28, 42-50, 42-59 Eastlake, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 Eastman, H. V., Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23 Eastport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Eau Galle River, Wis. (NCS) 27-6, 27-19 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-25, 9-32 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Edgar Jadwin, General, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-15, 7-16 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Ediz Hook, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 I-12 INDEX Edward MacDowell Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Eel River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Egegik River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Eight Mile Creek, Ark. (MR+T) 42-28 Eighteen Mile Island, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 El Dorado, Kans., W. Br., Walnut River, Channel Improvement (SWT) 19-15 El Dorado Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 El Paso, Tex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8, 17-9 El Tuque Beach, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 Eldred, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Eldrid, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Elfin Cove, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Elizabeth, N.J. (NAN) 2-37 Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Elizabethtown, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Elk City Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-35 Elk Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Elk River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Elk River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, near Gretna, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, near Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Elkins, W. Va. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Elkland, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Elkport, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Ellicott Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-14, 32-22 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Elm Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Elmira, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Elochoman Slough, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Elwha River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Emergency Bank Protection Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-7 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-25 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-7 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-23 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-7 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8, 14-14 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Emergency Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-7 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-28 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-7 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-18 New England Division (NED) 1-23 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-9 New York District (NAN) 2-20 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-12 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-19 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-14 Emergency protection for highway and railroad facilities at Chester, Ill., bridge (LMS) 14-14 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (LMS) 14-14 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois and Kaskaskia Rivers (LMS) 14-14 I-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-25 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-18 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-20 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Empire-Stratton, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Enderlin, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-6, 27-19 Endicott-Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) 51-1 England Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 English, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Enid, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Enid Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Entiat River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Ephraim Canyon Wash, Nogales, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Erie Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-28, 32-39 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Esquatzel Coulee, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Essex River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Estes, Carl L., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Euclid Creek, Cleveland, Ohio (NCB) 32-17, 32-22 Eufaula Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Evansdale, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Evansville, Ind. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-24, 24-29 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-19 Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Exeter River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Existing levees and extensions from Bastrop, La. to mouth of Boeuf River (LMK) 12-16 F Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Factory Brook, Middlefield, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Fair Haven Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Fairbury, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-23 Fairport Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-29 Fajardo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-46 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-37 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Fall of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area (ORD) 22-3 Fall River Basin, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13 Fall River Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Fall River Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Falling Creek, Rockingham, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Falls Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-15, 6-20 Falmouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Falmouth Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Falulah Brook, Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Far Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Farm Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-8, 28-12 Farmers Levee and Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28-15, 28-16 Farmington, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Feather River, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 47-1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses at Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-6 Federal Prison Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Felsenthal, Ark. (LMK) 12-13 Ferguson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-32 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-16, 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-22, 2-27, 2-36 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Fisher, O. C., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-1, 34-5, 34-8 Fishing Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Fishing Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Fishtrap Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-17 Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-45 Flannagan, John W., Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17 1-14 INDEX Flat Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Flathead River, Mont. (NPS) 38-25, 38-26, 38-27 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Activities Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-12 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Flood Damage Prevention Studies, Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-20 Flood Insurance Activities Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-31 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports, Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-49 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Florence Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-17 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Fly Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-35, 10-45 Follansbee, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Folly River, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-9, 7-12 Folsom Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Forest Heights, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Forestville, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork (LMM) 13-5 Forsyth, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Fort Cobb Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-26 Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Fort Leavenworth, Kans., Bridge Removal (MRK) 20-16 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Fort Macon State Park, N.C. (SAW) 6-26 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-33 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Fort Peck Lake, Mont. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12, 21-15, 21-19 Fort Pierce, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-29, 9-40 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-26, 9-33 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16, 21-19 Fort Scott Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Fort Supply Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Fort Trumbull Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Foss Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Foster Creek Road, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Foster Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Four Pole Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Four River Basins, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-30, 9-41, 9-52 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Fourmile Run, Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Fowl River, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, R.I. (NED) 1-23, 1-43 Fox River, Wis. (NCE) 31-6, 31-34, 31-48 Fox River Locks and Dams, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-12, 3-17, 4-21 Frankfort, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Frankfort, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Frankfort Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-6, 31-34, 31-48 Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-51 Franklin, W. P., Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. (MRO) 21-17 Frazeysburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Freeport, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Freeport, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-27 Freeport Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-18, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Fremont, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Frenchboro Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Freshwater Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-14 Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Friendly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Friendsville, Md. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (Above Plum Bayou) (SWL) 18-17 Fullerton, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Fullerton Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Fulton, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 I-15 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 G Galax, Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Galena, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-12 Galisteo Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-8 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Gallipolis, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-4, 15-13, 15-19, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Galveston Seawall Extension, Tex. (SWG) 15-11 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-8, 7-16 Gardner, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Garland City, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Garnett Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-19 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16, 21-19 Gasconade River, Mo. (MRK) 20-16 Gastineau Channel, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-16, 5-21 Gauley River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16, 21-18, 21-19 Gaysville Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 General Joe Wheeler Dam (ORN) 23-17 Geneva-On-The-Lake, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-35 Genoa Sewer Facility, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Geographic Systems Laboratory 51-1 George Street, Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-23 George, Walter F., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-31, 10-41 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-22, 10-30, 10-41 Georges River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-9, 7-12 Gering Valley, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Gila River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-4, 33-11, 33-19 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Gill Township Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Gillham Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-12, 18-23 Gill's Creek, Lancaster, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13 Glasgow, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Gleason Creek, Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-22, 2-27 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-46, 1-53 Goat Island, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Golconda, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Gold Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Goleta, Calif., and Vicinity (SPL) 33-8, 33-20 Goodfood Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-28, 10-39 Gooding Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Goose Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Goshen Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Governor's Run, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Grafton, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Grahn, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Grand Bayou Pass, La. (LMN) 11-14 Grand Calumet River Lock, Ind. (NCC) 28-21 Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-35, 31-48, 31-63 Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-10, 11-12 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-18 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Grand Marais Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-7, 31-35, 31-48 Grand Prairie, Tex., Sanitary Landfill (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Grand Prairie, Tex., Streambank Erosion at Meyers Road (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark., (MR+T) 42-16, 42-28, 42-52 Grand River, Grandville, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Grandview, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Grandview Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-39 Granger, Tex. (SWF) 16-17 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Grant's Canal Lake Providence, La. (MR+T) 42-56 Granville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Grapevine Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 I-16 INDEX Grassy Creek, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Graves Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Grays Creek Canal, Shelby Co., Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-12, 38-14, 38-19 Grays Landing Lock and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Grays River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Grayson Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-17 Great Chazy River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Coharie Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Lakes Information Management 31-30 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Miami River, Ind. (ORL) 24-27, 24-30 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Great Salt Plains Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Great Salt Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-29, 32-39 Great South Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Green and Barren Rivers, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-14, 24-18, 24-23, 24-27 Green Bay Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-7, 31-35, 31-48 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Green'Brook, Green Brook, N.J. (NAN) 2-40 Green Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-25, 1-33, 1-46, 1-53 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47, 37-49 Green River, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Green River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Green River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-8, 24-15, 24-27 Green Valley Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Greene, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Greenfield Bayou Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Greenup, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Greenup Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-8 Greenvale Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-15, 5-18 Greenville, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Greenville Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-29, 42-56 Greenwich Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Greenwood Beach, Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-24 Gregory Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Greilickville Harbor, Mich. (Formerly Traverse City Harbor) (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Grenada Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Greybull, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Griffithsville-Yawkey, W.Va. (ORH) 25-22 Grifton, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Gros Ventre River, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Grove Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Guadalupe River, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Guayanes Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-46 Guilford Creek, Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-25 Guilford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) (SAM) 10-8, 10-27, 10-35 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-14 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (Galveston, Tex., District) (SWG) 15-5, 15-13, 15-19, 15-28, 15-34, 15-32, 15-34 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Gulf Street and Trumbull Avenue, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-36 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Gull Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Guntersville Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Guttenberg, Iowa (NCS) 27-24 Guyandotte River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Gypsum, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 H H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23 Hackleman Corners Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Haines Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Haleiwa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Hamburg L-575, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30 Hammonassett Beach, Madison, Conn. (NED) 1-42 I-17 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-35, 31-49 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Hammondsport, N.Y. (NCB) 32-39 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Hampton Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hampton Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-53 Hampton Institute, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va.-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAO) 5-4, 5-15, 5-18 Hampton Roads Harbor, Supervision of (NAO) 5-8, 5-16 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Hanapepe Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Hanapepe River, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Hanging Rock, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-9, 28-13 Hannibal Harbor, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Hannibal Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Hanover, Minn. (NCS) 27-7, 27-19 Hanson, Howard A., Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-35, 31-49 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Harbor of Refuge and Pt. Judith Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-35 Harden, Cecil M., Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Harkers Island Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Harlan County Lake, Nebr. (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13, 20-19 Harlem River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-22 Harraseeket River, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-28, 42-58 Harrisburg, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Harrisville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-36, 31-49 Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-8, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Harsha, William H., Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Hartford, Vt. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Hartford, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-22 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15, 8-17 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. (LMN) 11-16 Hastings Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Hatchie River, Miss. (LMM) 13-1, 13-4 Haverhill, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Havre, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Hawesville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Hayden Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Hays, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Haysi, Va. (ORH) 25-20 Hayward Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Heise-Roberts Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-19 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Helena Harbor, Ark. (LMN) 13-5 Hellens Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Helm Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-28 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Henderson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Henderson Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Henderson County Drainage Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Henderson River, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Hendrick's Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Henry, Robert F., Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Henry T. Rainey Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Hergot Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-17 Herkimer, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Herreid, Spring Creek, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Herring Bay - Rockhold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Herring Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 1-18 INDEX Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Hickman Harbor, Ky. (LMM) 13-5 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-23 Higginsport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Highland Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Highway 12, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Highway 101, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Highway 362 Bridges, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Hildebrand Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47, 37-49 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Hillsborough River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Hillsdale Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-10, 20-13, 20-19 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Hingham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Hiwassee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Hoback River, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Hockingport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Hodges Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-21 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Hoh River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hoko River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook Levee, Ariz. (SPL) 33-8, 33-20 Holland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-36, 31-49 Holley Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Holly, Colo. (SWA) 17-7 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach along Lake Michigan, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-43 Holmes Creek, Fla. (SAM) 10-42 Holston River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Holyoke, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Homer Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Hominy Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-7, 27-20 Homochitto River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14, 12-19 Homosassa River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Honey Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Honey Hill Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Honga River and Tar Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Hood Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Hooper, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Hop Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-51 Hoquiam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 Horn Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hornell, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Hoskins Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hot Springs, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Houlka Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Houma Navigation Canal, La. (LMN) 11-14 Housatonic River, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-45 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-35, 1-43 Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Housatonic River Basin, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-23, 1-49 Houston School Road Bridge, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-21, 15-28, 15-30, 15-34 Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Hudson River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Hudson River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-23, 2-28, 2-32, 2-33, 2-38 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Hugo Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Hulah Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Hull, Cordell, Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Humboldt, Tenn. (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Humboldt Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Huntingdon, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Huntington, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Huntington, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Huntington Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Huot, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Huron Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-30 Hurricane Barrier Operations, New England Division (NED) 1-23 Hutchins, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 I-19 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Hyannis Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-34 Hyde County Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes 31-31 Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) 53-2 I Iao Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-22 Ida Grove, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. (NCR) 28-2, 28-8 Illinois River, Ill. (MR+T) 42-19 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind. (NCR) 28-2, 28-8, 28-10, 28-16, 28-20, 28-21, 28-22 Imperial Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Indian Bend Wash, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Indian Creek Area, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Indian Creek, Corydon, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Indian Creek Lake, Emerson, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13, 21-18 Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Indian Island, Maine (NED) 1-22 Indian Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-4, 3-15, 3-19 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Emergency Stone Repairs, Beverly Shores, Ind. (NCC) 30-6, 30-9, 30-13 Indiana Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-4, 30-9, 30-12, 30-14, 30-15 Indianapolis, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-29 Indianapolis, Ind. (Fall Creek Section) (ORL) 24-20 Indianola, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Industry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Inez, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Inland Route, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-36, 31-49 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va., to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (NAP) 3-6, 3-16, 3-19 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-14 Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-5, 3-15, 3-19 Institute for Water Resources 53-3 Intercounty D. D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 International Boundary Waters Boards, 49-1 International Champlain-Richelieu Board 49-2 International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board 31-30, 49-2 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 31-30, 49-2 International Joint Commission Board of Control (IJC) 49-1 International Kootenay Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Champlain Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Memphremagog Board 49-2 International Lake of the Woods Control Board 49-1 International Lake Superior Board of Control 31-29, 49-1 International Niagara Board of Control 31-30, 49-1 International Niagara Committee 49-2 International Niagara Working Committee 31-30 International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Rainy Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Skagit River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris-Red Rivers Engineering Board 49-2 International St. Croix River Board of Control 49-1 International St. Lawrence River Board of Control 31-30, 49-1 Interstate Bridge, Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Interstate 20 Bridges, Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-26, 9-33 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-26, 9-33, 9-46 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Intracoastal Waterway, Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-14 Investigations of Projects Under the Federal Power Act 47-1 Iola Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Ipswich Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-19 Ironton, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Irving Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-20, 27-24, 27-27 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif. (SPK) 35-8, 35-24 Island Avenue, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 1-20 INDEX Island Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Island Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Isle of Shoals Harbor, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-39 Islesboro (The Narrows), Maine (NED) 1-18, 1-22, 1-29, 1-36, 1-43 Ithaca, N.Y., Cascadilla Creek (NCB) 32-39 Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet (NCB) 32-37 Ithaca, N.Y., Fall Creek (NCB) 32-39 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Jackson, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-30 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Jackson Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Jackson Hole, Wyo. (NPW) 39-14 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, W.Va. (ORH) 25-22 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-26, 9-34 Jadwin, General Edgar, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 James River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-19, 5-25 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, Wis. (NCR) 28-16 Jarvis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, near Waterloo, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, near Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-8, 17-10 Jenkins, Tom, Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-15, 25-18 Jenkins, Tom, Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-10 Jenks Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Jeremy Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-23, 10-30, 10-41 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-17, 19-18 Joe Pool Lake (Lakeville Lake), Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 John Day River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-27, 37-36, 37-40, 37-44 John Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-16, 6-20 John Martin Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17 Johns Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-26, 9-34 Johnson Bay, Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-43 Johnson Bayou, La. (SWG) 15-27 Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Johnsonburg, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Johnstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33 Jonesport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-5, 1-26, 1-34 Jonesville, La. (LMK) 12-13 Jordan, B. Everett, Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-15, 6-20 Jordan Creek, Henry County, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Josias River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Julian, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Juneau Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 K Kaaawa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kahoma Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36-6, 36-7 Kahului Beach Road, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kahului Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kake Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Kalama Turning Basin, Wash. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-35 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo), Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Kalaupapa Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-2, 25-12, 25-16 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kankakee River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 30-15 Kanopolis Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-10, 20-13, 20-19 Kansas City, Kans. (1962 Mod.) (MRK) 20-17 Kansas Citys on Mo. and Kansas Rivers, Mo. and Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 20-19 Kansas River Navigation, Kans. (MRK) 20-16 Kapaa Town, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 1-21 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Karlson Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Kasilof Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11, 14-14 Kaskaskia River, Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Kaukauna Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Fifth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Guard Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-6 Kaunakakai Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kaunakakai Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kaw Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kawainui Swamp, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-24 Kawkawlin River, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-44, 31-56 Kays Creek, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Keach Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Keehi Lagoon, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Kehoe Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Keithsburg Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Kekaha Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kelleys Island, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20, 38-31 Kennebec River, Maine (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34 Kennebunk River, Maine (NED) 1-6, 1-25, 1-33, 1-39 Kenosha Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-36, 31-49 Kentucky Lock and Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-17 Kentucky River, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-14, 24-23, 24-27 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Kerr, John H., Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-16, 6-20 Kerr, Robert S., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16 Kerr, Robert S., Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-14 Kewalo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-36, 31-50 Kewaunee River, Wis. (NCE) 31-63 Keweenaw Waterway, Mich. (NCE) 31-10, 31-37, 31-50 Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-47 Key West Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Keyport Harbor, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Keystone Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-7, 19-12, 19-15, 19-16, 19-17 Kickapoo River, Gay Mills, Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-20 Kihei Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay Channel, N.J. and N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28 King Cove Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Kings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Kingston Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass. (NED) 1-39 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Kingstree Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pa. and N.Y. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 Kirwan, Michael J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Kishwaukee River at De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Kissimmee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Kittanning, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Kittanning, Pa. Part II (ORP) 26-23 Kitzmiller, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Klamath River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 35-31 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Knappa Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Knapps Narrows, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Knife River Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-11, 31-37, 31-50 Knights Valley Lake, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Knightville Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Konkapot River, North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Kualoa Regional Park, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kuliouou Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kuskokwim River, Bethel, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-12 L L'Anguille Basin, Ark. (MR + T) 42-28 L'Anguille River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-18 La Conner, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 La Crosse, Wis. (NCS) 27-24 1-22 INDEX La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, Wis. (NCS) 27-8, 27-20 La Grange Bayou, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 La Grange Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 La Pointe Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-11, 31-37, 31-50 La Trappe, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Lac Qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-8, 27-20 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Lackawanna, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-32 Lafayette Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21 Lafayette River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lago De Cerrillos, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Lago De Portugues, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-9, 27-20 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-14 Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-12 Lake Camanche, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-29, 37-38, 37-52 Lake City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Lake Champlain, Plattsburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La. (LMN) 11-14 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (ORP) 26-23 Lake City Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Lake Crockett, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Lake Darling, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-9, 27-20 Lake Douglas, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16 Lake Georgetown, Tex. (SWF) 16-17 Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 Lake Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lake Hudson, Okla. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Lake Kemp, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Lake Meredith, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, Ill. (NCC) 30-7, 30-10, 30-13 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Lake Neatahwanta, Fulton, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11 Lake Ocklawaha, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Ogleton, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Lake Oroville, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Lake Pontchartrain, La. (MR+T) 42-15, 42-56 Lake Pontchartrain, La. Project Levees (MR+T) 42-45, 42-49 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, La., (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-6, 11-10, 11-12 Lake Providence Harbor, La. (LMK) 12-14 Lake Pulaski, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-20 Lake River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Lake River Delta Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Lake Rousseau, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-12 Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12 Lake Sharpe, S. Dak (MRO) 21-7, 21-12 Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-30, 10-41 Lake St. Clair, Mich., Channels (NCE) 31-11, 31-37, 31-50 Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-23 Lake Traverse and Bois De Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-20 Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 Lake Wallula, Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12 Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20, 38-31 Lakeport Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-22 Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (NCB) 32-12, 32-21 Lamoille River, Vt. (NAN) 2-36, 2-38 Lamprey River, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Lancaster, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Lancaster, Israel River, N.H. (NED) 1-43 Langdon Park, Wilmette, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Lansing (Grand River), Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Lansing Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 LaPlatte River, Shelburne Bay, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Lamed, Kans. (SWT) 19-17 Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-7, 11-10, 11-13 Larson Bay Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 I-23 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Las Animas, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Las Cruces, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Las Tunas Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Nev. (SPL) 33-21 Latrobe, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Latta Brook Road, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Lava Hot Springs, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lavaca-Navidad River, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Lavon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-16, 16-20 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-16, 16-20 Lawrence, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Lawrenceburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Lawyers Creek, Kamiah, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Lead Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-11 Leading Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Leavenworth, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Lebanon Junction, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Le Claire Lock (Canal), Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lee, Housatonic River, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Leech Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project (SAW) 6-12, 6-20 Leetonia, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Leetsdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-13 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-24 Leipsic River, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Leith's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Leith's Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Leland Bowman Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Leland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-37, 31-50 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Letart, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Letart Falls, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Unit No. 1, Ill. (ORL) 24-21 Levee Unit No. 5, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-29 Levee Unit No. 8, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Levees (LMK) (LMS) (MR+T) (ORL) 14-14, 24-22, 24-25, 42-4, 42-10, 42-28, 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-54, 42-55, 42-57 Levels of the Great Lakes 31-31 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17, 25-19 Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16 Lewis and Clark River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Lewis River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Lewis River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Lewisport, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12 Lewisville Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-16, 16-20 Lexington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-37, 31-51 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, Mont. (NAS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 Liberty Local Protection Project, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. (NAN) 2-18, 2-25, 2-31 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-27 Licking River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19, 24-27, 24-30 Lido Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lighthouse Point Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Lincoln, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Lincoln, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Lincoln Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Lincoln School Lake, Me. (NED) 1-43 Linton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Lisle, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Little Bay, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Mo. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14 Little Blue River Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14 Little Caillou Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-14 Little Calumet River, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Little Chute Combined Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Chute Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Chute First (Guard) Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Chute Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Little Dell Lake, Utah (SPK) 35-10, 35-24 Little Egg Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-19, 39-22 Little Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Little Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Little Kaukauna Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-38, 31-51 Little Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-19 1-24 INDEX Little Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12 Little Miami River, Ohio (ORL) 24-27, 24-30 Little Missouri River, Ark. (LMK) 12-14, 12-16 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Little Nemaha River, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Little Papillion, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Little Pee Dee and Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Little River, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Little River, La. (LMK) 12-14 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Little River Basin (Little Rock District), Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12, 18-23 Little River (Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-23 Little River Dike, Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Little River Diversion Channel, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-13 Little River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-49 Little Rock Levee, Ark. (East End Fourche Bayou) (SWL) 18-17 Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-11 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-13 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-20, 32-30 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Little Tallahatchie River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Little Tennessee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah (SPK) 35-33 Little Wicomico River, Va. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Little Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Littleville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Lloyd Park, Winnetka, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Lock and Dam No. 1, Minn. (NCD) 29-5, 29-9 Lock and Dam No. 2, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-19 Lock and Dam No. 2, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 2, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 3, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 3, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 3, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 4, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Lock and 26-24 Lock and Lock and Lock and Lock and 26-24 Lock and Lock and 26-24 Dam No. 4, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Dam No. 5, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) Dam No. Dam No. Dam No. Dam No. 5, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 5, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 5A, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 6, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) Dam No. 6, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Dam No. 7, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) Lock and Dam No. 7, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 7, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 8, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Lock and Dam No. 9, 1 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 9, 1 Lock and Dam No. 9, Lock and Dam No. 10, Lock and Dam No. 11, Lock and Dam No. 11, Lock and Dam No. 12, Lock and Dam No. 13, 18-20, 19-16 Lock and Dam No. 13, Lock and Dam No. 14, Lock and Dam No. 15, Lock and Dam No. 16, Lock and Dam No. 17, Lock and Dam No. 18, Lock and Dam No. 19, Lock and Dam No. 20, Lock and Dam No. 21, Lock and Dam No. 22, Lock and Dam No. 24, Lock and Dam No. 25, Lock and Dam No. 26, Lock and Dam No. 52, Lock and Dam No. 53, Lock S-53, Fla. (SAJ) Lock S-55, Fla. (SAJ) Lock S-57, Fla. (SAJ) Lock S-58, Fla. (SAJ) Lock S-59, Fla. (SAJ) Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Alegheny River, Pa. (ORP) Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-19 Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Ark. (SWL) 18-20 Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Ark. (SWL) (SWT) 18-3, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Ill. (NCD) 29-5 Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Ill. (ORD) 22-3, 22-10 Ill. (ORD) 22-3, 22-10 9-49 9-49 9-48 9-48 9-48 1-25 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Lock S-60, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-61, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-62, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-63, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-63A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65C, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65D, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65E, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-96, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-96A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-157, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-158, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-193, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-308B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-310, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) 4-20, 4-36 Locklies Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lockport Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Logan, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, near Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Lone Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-18 Long Beach Island, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Long Branch Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-14 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33 Long Lake Area, Helena, Ark. (LMM) 13-6 Long Tom River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Longboat Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-27, 9-34 Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47, 37-49 Lopez Canyon Diversion, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Lopez Dam, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Lorain Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-7, 32-20, 32-30 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-14 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-11, 33-16, 33-22, 33-23 Los Coches Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-11, 33-16 Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-13 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-29, 37-38, 37-47 Lost River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Louisville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Louisville Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Loves Park, Ill. (NCR) 28-9 Lowell, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-51 Lowell Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. (MR�T) 42-16, 42-28, 42-54, 42-57 Lower Arkansas River Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-7 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-36, 37-41, 37-48 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries) Downstream from Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Lower Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-20, 39-22 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-9, 39-12, 39-20, 39-22 Lower Red River-South Bank, Red River Levees, La. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-15, 42-28, 42-46, 42-49, 42-57 Lower Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-33, 42-37 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Lower San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-24, 35-33 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. (SPK) 35-25, 35-31 Lower Snake River, Wash., Oreg., Idaho, Fish and Wildlife Compensation (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-12 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Lower White River and Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-17, 42-28, 42-53 Lower White River Levees (MR+T) 42-9, 42-48, 42-49, 42-57 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-43, 1-48 Lowes Wharf, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-23, 4-29 Loyalhanna Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Loyalsock, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-22 Lubec Channel, Maine (NED) 1-39 Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Ludington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-38, 31-51 I-26 INDEX Ludlow, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Ludlow Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Lukfata Lake, Okla. and Ark. (SWT) 19-15 Lusk Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-30 Lutsen Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-62 Lyford Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Lyman Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Lynn Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35, 1-42 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lytle and Cajun Creeks channel improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-12, 33-16 M Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 MacDowell, Edward, Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Machias River, Maine (NED) 1-23, 1-39 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-28 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-38, 31-51 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-38, 31-51 Macon, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 Mad River, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-48 Mad River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Mad River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Madison, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Madison, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Madison Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Madison Parish Port, La. (LMK) 12-14 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-44, 37-48 Mahnomen, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Mahoning Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-21 Malden River, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Malheur Improvement District, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Malheur River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16, 39-17 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Manasquan River, N.J. (NAP) 3-7, 3-16, 3-19 Manatee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Manchester, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Manchester Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Manhattan, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Manistee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-38, 31-51 Manistique Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-14, 31-38, 31-51 Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-20 Mann's Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Manokin River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-19 Mantua Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Maple River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 Mapleshade, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Marblehead Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Marengo, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-23, 1-31, 1-37 Markham Ferry, Okla. (SWL) 18-22 Marietta, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Marina Del Rey, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Marine Design Center 53-5 Marion, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Marion, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17, 19-18 Marion County Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marion Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Markham Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-22 Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Markland Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-9 Marmarth, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Marquette Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-14, 31-39, 31-52 Marseilles Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Marshalltown, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marshland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Martin, John, Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 Martin, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Martin Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39 Martins Ferry, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9, 23-18 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-24 Marysville, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Marysville Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 I-27 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Mason, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Mason J. Niblack Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Massillon, Ohio (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD), 36-10 Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-22, 15-30, 15-35 Matawan Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Matinicus Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Mauckport, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-12 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-39 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Maurice River, N.J. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11 Maxwell Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34 Mayo, W. D., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-16 Mayse, Pat, Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Maysville, Ky. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 McAlpine Locks and Dam (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-9 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (SWT) 19-2, 19-9, 19-13, 19-16 McCook Lake, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 McDonald Dike Road, Ore. (NPP) 37-42 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 McGinnis Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 McKees Rocks, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula-Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-8, 39-10, 39-12, 39-21 Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Medomak River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Meherrin River, N.C. (NAO) 5-23 Mekoryuk, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34 Meldahl, Captain Anthony, Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Melton Hill Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Melvern Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-14, 20-19 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-29 Memphis Harbor Project Levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-49 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Menasha Lock and Dam (NCE) 31-60 Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis. (NCE) 31-15, 31-39, 31-52 Meramec Park Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9 Meramec River Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-12, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-12, 35-24, 35-34 Merced County Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-24 Merced River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Mercer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12, 14-14 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-14 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. (LMN) 11-14 Merriam, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-43 Merrimack River, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-51 Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and Mass. (NED) 1-18, 1-23, 1-51 Merrimack River, Concord, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Metamora Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27 Methow River, Wash. (NAS) 38-27 Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-11 Metropolis, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Miami Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34 Miami River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45 Miami River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Mianus River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Michigan City Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-5, 30-9, 30-12, 30-14, 30-15 Middle Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Middle Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38--16, 38-22 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, Upper End of Safford Valley to Buttes Damsite I-28 INDEX (Camelsback Damsite to Salt River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Middle River at Argyle, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Middleport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Middlesboro, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) (ORN) 23-19 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) (ORN) 23-13, 23-18, 23-19 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Midland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12, 28-17 Miles City, Mont. (MRO) 21-17 Milford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Milford Haven, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Milford Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-14, 20-19 Mill Brook, Brownsville, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-23, 1-28 Mill Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-27, 24-30 Mill Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Mill Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Mill Creek, Ohio (ORL) (ORH) 24-4, 24-14, 25-21 Mill Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Mill Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Mill Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-16 Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Mill Creek levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Mill Four Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Mill Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Miller, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Millersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Millican Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Millwood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12, 18-23 Milton, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Milton, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Milton-Freewater, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Milton Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-15, 31-39, 31-52 Mineral Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Mingo Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Mingo Junction, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Mining City Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Minneota, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22 Minnesota River at Le Sueur, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Minot, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24, 27-27 Mispillion River, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-14, 3-16, 3-19 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Mission Zanja Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt. (NAN) 2-36, 2-39 Mississinewa Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Mississippi Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-28 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42-3 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., Underseepage Measures (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River and Alluvial Valley below Cape Girardeau, Mo. (MR+T) 42-2 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR+T) 42-1 to 42-63 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-30, 42-34, 42-39 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (NCS) (NCD) 27-2, 28-3, 29-1, 29-4, 29-10 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Mississippi River Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-29, 42-50, 42-51, 42-53 Mississippi River Commission (MR+T) 42-1 Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La., (New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-8, 11-11, 11-13 Mississippi River Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-59 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. (LMN) 11-15 I-29 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Mississippi River Headwater Reservoirs, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22, 27-26 Mississippi River Improvements (MR+T) 42-11 Mississippi River Levees (MR+T) 42-10, 42-28, 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-49 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-29 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. (LMN) 11-4, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-49 Mississippi River Tributary and Outlet Improvements (MR+T) 42-13 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR+T) 42-20 Missouri National Recreational River, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-13 Missouri River, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Missouri River at New Haven, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14, 21-19 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr. to Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK) 20-5, 20-11, 20-14, 20-18, 20-19, 20-21 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr.) (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14, 21-18, 21-19, 21-21 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 20-19 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-16 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13, 21-18 Mitigation of Shore Damages, Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-26 Mobile Bay, Ala. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-35 Mobile Harbor, Ala. (SAM) 10-9, 10-27, 10-36 Mocassin Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Moccasin Springs, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Moclips River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Mojave River Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-12, 33-17 Mokelumne River, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-9, 28-13 Moline Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17, 26-25, 26-26 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Monoosnoc Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (LMK) 12-16 Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Monroe Floodwall, La. (LMK) 12-19 Monroe Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-39, 31-52 Monroe Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16, 24-27 Montcalm, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Montgomery Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Montour Falls, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Moore Haven Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Moorefield, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Moores Ferry, Va. (ORH) 25-20 Moorhead, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Moosabec Bar, Maine (NED) 1-39 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Morgan City and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-7, 11-10, 11-13 Morgantown Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Morganza Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-50 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28 Mormon Slough, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Morrison, Colo. (MRO) 21-18 Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-20 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-15 Moscow, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Moss Bluff Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Mott, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Mound City Locks and Dam, Ill. (ORD) 22-1, 22-10 Mounds and Mound City, Ill. (LMM) 13-6 Moundsville, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-27, 37-37 Mount St. Helens Emergency Measures, Wash. (NPP) 37-13 Mount St. Helens Sediment Control, Wash. (NPP) 37-16, 37-27, 37-37 1-30 INDEX Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Mountain Park Reservoir (Tom Steed Lake), Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Moyock Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind. (NCC) 30-15 Mt. Carmel, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 32-15, 32-22 Mud and Basket Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Mud Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-28 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-9, 38-16, 38-22 Mud River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Muddy Creek Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Muddy Creek near Syracuse, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Mulberry Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Mullet Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Muncie, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Munday Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39, 10-43 Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Murderkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-14, 3-16, 3-19 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-19 Murray Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-19 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-10, 7-13 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Muscatine, Iowa (Mad Creek) (NCR) 28-14 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Muscatine Island L. and D. D., Louisa D. D. No. 13, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Muscooten Bay, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 Muskegon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-39, 31-52 Muskingum River, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-17 Mustinka River, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Myrtle Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Mystic, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Mystic River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Mystic River, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34 N Naches River, Naches, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Nagel Drainage District, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Nahunta Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Naknek River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Namo River, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-11 Nan Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nandua Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (POD) 36-5, 36-6, 36-7 Nansemond River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Nantasket Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Nanticoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. (NED) 1-39 Napa River, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Napa River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Napatree Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Narragansett Pier, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Narraguagus River, Maine (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-53 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-8, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33 Nashua, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-51 Natchez Port Area, Miss. (LMK) 12-19 Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 National Dredging Program 53-4 National Emergency Management Activities, Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-11 National Emergency Preparedness Activities, 3-14, 21-9, 32-16, 48-1 Natural Disaster Activities, New York District (NAN) 2-20 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities, 43-1 Navajo Reservoir, N. Mex. (SPK) 35-30 Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Navasota Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Navigation Aids (U.S. Coast Guard), Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Navigation Locks and Dams, Ark. (SWL) 18-11 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Calcasieu Pass Channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.) (LMN) 11-15 Nawiliwili Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-6, 36-7 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System 31-30 Neabsco Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neah Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 1-31 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Neale Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Neavitt Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Needles, Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-31 Nehalem Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Neodesha Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-15, 19-16 Neon-Fleming, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Nestucca River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-42 Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-28 Neuse River Barrier, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Neuse River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-30 Neuse River, 300 foot-wide channel in front of New Bern, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Neville Island, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 New Amsterdam, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. (NED) 1-39 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-36 New Bedford-Fairhaven Hurricane Barrier, Mass. (NED) 1-23 New Boston Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 New Buffalo Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-40, 31-53 New Bullards Bar, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 New Cumberland, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, Ohio (ORD) 22-7 New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22 New Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 New Harmony, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New Harmony Bridge, Ill. and Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24 New Haven Breakwater, Conn. (NED) 1-39 New Haven Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34, 1-38 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-16, 3-19 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Lock and Dam 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 New London, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-22, 1-23, 1-30, 1-37 New London Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-34, 1-53 New Madrid Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-5 New Martinsville, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 New Matamoras, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 New Melones Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-19 New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection (LMN) 11-8, 11-11, 11-13 New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-27, 9-35 New Richmond, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 New River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 New River, Onslow County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 New River, Va. and W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 New York and New Jersey Channels, (NAN) 2-10, 2-24, 2-29, 2-32, 2-33, 2-38 New York Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-11, 2-24, 2-29 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-11, 2-24, 2-29 New York Harbor, Supervisor of (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-32 Newark, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-17, 25-20, 25-22 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J. (NAN) 2-8, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33, 2-38 Newaukum River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Newburgh, Ind. (ORL) 24-20 Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-34, 1-53 Newhall Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Newmarket Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Newport, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Newport, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Newport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Newport Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Newport News Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Newry-Old Pickens Dam and Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-16 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-9, 2-24, 2-29, 2-33 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Niagara River, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35, 32-39 Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Niblack, Mason J., Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Nicholasville, (Townfork) Vicinity, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Nichols, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nickajack Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Nimrod Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12, 18-22 Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-12 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 1-32 INDEX Nisqually River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Nixon Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Nolin Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16, 24-27 Nome Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-12 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, Tenn. (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Nonewaug River, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Nookagee Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Nooksack River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Norfolk Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-15, 5-19, 5-25 Norfork Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-24 Normal, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Norman Reservoir (Lake Thunderbird), Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Norrell Lock - Dam (No. 1) - Entrance Channel, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-18 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. (NAN) 2-36 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. (NED) 1-45 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-17 North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 North Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va. (ROH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-17 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 North Fork Skykomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-45 North Hartland Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-43 North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 North River Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-42 North Second St., Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) (LMM) 13-6 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Springfield Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-49 North Wildwood, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Northeast Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Northeast River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Northfield Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Northport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Northport Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-62 Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Norwalk Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Norwich, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-52 Norwich, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nottoway River, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-15, 5-20 Noxubee River, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39, 10-42 Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 O Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin S. Dak. and N. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-12, 21-16, 21-19 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-20 Oakdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Oakford Special Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Oakland Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-9 Oates Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-10, 8-16 Obey River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Obion River, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 O'Brien, T.J., Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Occohannock Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Occoquan Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Ocean Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Ocean City, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-29 Oceana, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Oceanside, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-15 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-42 Oconto Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-62 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Ocracoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-3, 36-6 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20, 32-31 Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area (ORD) 22-3 Ohio River, Ill. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-19 I-33 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 25-8, 25-14 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-18, 24-24, 24-30 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 23-6, 23-12, 23-18 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-26, 26-27 Ohio River, Locks and Dams (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-6 Ohio River, Open Channel Work (ORD) 22-4, 22-5, 22-6 Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-14 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers (NPS) 38-25 Okanogan River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okatibbee Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-12, 10-28, 10-38 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-27, 9-35, 9-44, 9-45, 9-47 Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Oklawaha River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-35 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20, 32-31 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Old Highway 82 Bridge, Columbus, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Old River, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Old River, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-28, 42-50 Old River, Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-31 Old Town Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Oldmans Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Olive Hill, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21 Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19, 21-20 Onaga Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Onancock River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Oneonta, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-17, 31-40, 31-53 Oologah Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-42 Opekiska Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 22-4, 22-5, 22-6 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-22 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-22 Optima Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Orange River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Orchard Beach, Bronx, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Orleans, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-31 Orofmo Creek and Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) (NCS) 27-27 Osage River, Kans. and Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Osage River, Mo., Lock and Dam (MRK) 20-16 Osawatomie, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Osceola Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-35, 32-39 Ottawa, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 32-15 Ottawa River Harbor, Mich. and Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12 Otter Creek Park, Ky. (ORL) 24-31 Otter Tail River, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Ottumwa, Iowa (NCR) 28-15 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La. (Felsenthal Canal) (LMK) 12-14 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La., Locks and Dams (LMK) 12-13 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-12, 12-16 Ouachita River Basin (LMK) 12-21 Ouachita River Levees, La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-16 Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. (LMK) 12-14 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Owego, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Owensboro, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Owl's Head Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Owyhee River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-12 Oxford, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Oxford, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Oyster Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Oyster Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Ozan Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-16 1-34 INDEX Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-20 Ozona, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Pagan River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-22 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio (ORH) 25-22 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-18 Paint Rock River, Ala. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Painted Post, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-4, 33-11, 33-15 Paintsville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-18 Pajaro River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-22, 35-27 Palm Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-47 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Martin County Line of Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County Line (SAJ) 9-20, 9-29, 9-40 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-36 Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Pamunkey River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Panacea Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Panama City Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-9, 10-27, 10-36, 10-45 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Panther Creek, Curdsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Panther Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, Nebr. (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14 Parish Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-30 Park City, Kans. (SWT) 19-17 Park River, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-36, 1-49 Parker Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-15, 5-20 Parkersburg, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Parrotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10-36 Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pass Christian, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Pass Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-15 Pass-a-Grille Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Passaic River, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Passaic River Basin, N.J. and N.Y., Phase I (NAN) 2-18, 2-31 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Maine (NED) 1-44 Pat Mayse Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Pataha Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Patchogue River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Patman, Wright, Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-17, 16-12, 16-17, 16-21 Patoka Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-27 Patoka River at Jasper, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Patoka River, Winslow, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Patriot, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Patten Bay, Maine (NED) 1-46 Pattonsburg Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Patuxent River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Pawcatuck, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-23, 1-43 Pawcatuck River, R.I. and Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Pawtucket, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Pawtuxet Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pawtuxet River, Cranston, R.I. (NED) 1-23 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-36, 1-47, 1-48 Pax, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Payette River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Payette Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Pearl River, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-12, 12-14, 12-21 Pearl River Basin, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-21 Pearl River, Interstate 20 Bridges, Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Pecatonica River at Darlington, Wis. (NCR) 28-16 Peconic River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pecos, Tex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Pelican Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Pembina River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Pendleton, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Pendleton Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-44, 37-48 I-35 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Penny Slough, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Penobscot River, Old Town, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-31, 1-37, 1-39 Pensacola Bay, Fla. to Mobile Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-35 Pensacola Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10-37, 10-45 Pensacola Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-22 Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-17, 31-40, 31-53 Pentwater Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-17, 31-40, 31-53, 31-63 Peoria, Ill. (NCC) 28-15 Peoria Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 Pepin Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Pepper Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Pepperell Cove, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-38 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) 46-1 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Perry Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-5, 20-11, 20-14, 20-19 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements) Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Perth Amboy, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Petaluma River, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Peters Creek, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Petit Jean River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-15 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-40, 31-53 Peyton Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Phillips Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-15, 6-16, 6-20 Phoenix, Ariz., and Vicinity (including New River) (SPL) 33-4, 33-11, 33-16 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist) (MRK) 20-5, 20-14 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO) 21-5, 21-14, 21-19 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Pierce, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Pig Island Gut, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pike Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Pilchuck River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Pilot Rock, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (Globe), Ariz., (SPL) 33-19 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Nev. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17 Pine Bluff, Ark. (LMK) 12-16 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Pine Creek Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-11, 19-14, 19-18 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (SPK) 35-12, 35-24 Pine Ford Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9 Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Pine River, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Pine River Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Pinellas County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-30, 9-40 Pineville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Pineville, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Pinole Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Pioneer Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Pipestem Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-15 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. (ORP) 26-21 Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-50 Placentia Canal, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Placer Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Plainviw Local Flood Protection Project (SWF) 16-22 Platoro Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-6 Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement (MRK) 20-17 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Platte River and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Platte River near Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-12, 2-24, 2-30 Pleasant Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Pleasant Point, Perry, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-24, 1-31 Pleasant River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pleasanton Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Plum Creek, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Plum Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 I-36 INDEX Plum Island, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Plymouth, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Poca, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Pocomoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, R.I. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-35, 1-45, 1-46, 1-53 Point Lookout Harbor (Au Gres River), Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-40, 31-53 Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-15, 32-22 Point Pleasant, W. Va. (ORL) 25-20, 25-22 Pokegama Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Pomeroy, Ohio (ORL) 25-21 Pomme De Terre Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-11, 20-15, 20-19 Pomona Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-11, 20-15, 20-19 Ponce, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Ponce De Leon Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-36 Ponce Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-36 Pontiac Diversion, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Pool, Joe, Lake (Lakeview Lake), Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16,.16-20 Port Alexander, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-14, 40-15 Port Allen Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30 Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-25 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-53 Port Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 Port Dickinson, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-28, 9-36 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-24, 1-30, 1-36 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30, 38-31 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Hueneme, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Jervis, N.Y. (NAP) 3-13 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Port of Kalama, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Port Orford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-10, 7-13 Port San Luis, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-53 Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Port Townsend, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Port Washington Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-53 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-53 Portage, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-53 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Porter Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-12 Portland, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Portland, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Portland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO) 5-23 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-39 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-30, 9-41 Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Poteau River Navigation, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Poteet Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-30 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control, Md., Va., D.C. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River below Washington, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potowomut River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pottstown, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Poverty Point, La. (LMN) 12-6, 12-10, 12-12 Powell County High School, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Powhatan Point, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Prado Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Prairie Du Chien, Wis. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Prairie Du Chien Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 I-37 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prattville, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Pre-Authorization Studies for Beach Erosion Control Activities Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-14 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-26 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-8 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-21 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-12, 10-44 New England Division (NED) 1-46 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-36 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-10 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-8 Pre-Authorization Studies for Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-7 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCR) 31-28 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12, 16-23 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-53 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-7, 20-21 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5, 18-25 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-25 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-44 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-6, 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-47 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-9 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-12 Omaha, Nebr., District (NRO) 21-6, 21-22 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-46 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 - Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-7, 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-31 Pre-Authorization Studies for Navigation Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-15 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-11, 32-36 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-15 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-25 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-9 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-17 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-4 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-1 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-12, 10-44 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-46 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-5 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-9 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-8 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-45 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-3 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-29 Prescott Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (NCB) 32-13, 32-21, 32-33 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-43 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prestonburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Prestonville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Priest, J. Percy, Dam and Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Priest Rapids Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-30 Princeton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Prineville Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Proctor, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Proctor Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Proctorville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Prompton Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-46 Providence River and Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (NED) 1-45 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 I-38 INDEX Pudding River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (Floodway Levee Extension) (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Puget Sound and Its Tributary Waters, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21 Pullman, Palouse, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Punta Salinas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 Punxsutawney, Pa. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Put In Bay, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Pysht River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Queens Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Queenstown Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Queets River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21, 38-28 Quinalt River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quinby Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-16, 5-20 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 28-13 Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Quincy Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Quinnipiac River, North Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-23 R R. D. Bailey Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-18 Raccoon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Raccoon Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Racine, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Racine Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-54 Racine Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-8 Rahway, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Rahway, South Branch, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Rahway River, N.J. (NAN) 2-38 Rainey, Henry T., Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Rancocas Creek at Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-13 Rancocas River, N.J. (NAP) 3-24 Randleman Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-20 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Rapid Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Rappahannock River, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-18 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Raritan River, N.J. (NAN) 2-12, 2-24, 2-30, 2-33, 2-38 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Rathbun Lake, Iowa (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-17 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 20-17 Ravenswood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Rayburn, Sam, Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-17, 16-20 Raystown Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Red Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Red Lake River at Huot, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Red River at East Grand Forks, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Red River at Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Red River at Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Red River Backwater Levees (MR+T) 42-46, 42-49, 42-52 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWL) 18-15 Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (LMK) (SWT) 12-7, 12-10, 12-12, 12-17, 19-15 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7 Red River below Fulton, Ark. (LMK) 12-14 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River from Fulton, Ark., to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 19-15 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Red River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-23 I-39 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-12, 27-20 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S. Dak. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-12, 27-21, 27-27 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-21 Red River Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-37 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. (LMK) 12-14 Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. (LMK) 12-14 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. (LMK) 12-7, 12-10, 12-12 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Red Wing Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Reddies River Lake, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-16 Redmond, John, Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Redwater River and Hay Creek, S.D. (MRO) 21-18 Redwood City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Redwood River at Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-21 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Reedsport Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Reedy River, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-28 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Reevesville, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC) 44-1, 44-5, 44-6 Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness Activities 48-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. (NAP) 3-23 Removal of Aquatic Growth, La. (LMN) 11-15 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ) 9-13, 9-28, 9-37, 9-45 Removal of Sunken Vessels 48-1 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River below Mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) (LMM) 12-14, 13-5 Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District (SAM) 10-42 Rend Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio (NCB) 32-15, 32-37 Republican River, Neb. and Kan. (MRK) 20-19 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22, 27-26 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, B44neville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Revere Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-27, 1-35 Reynoldsville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rheem Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Rice Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Richland Creek, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Richland Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Richmond, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-16, 5-21 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Richmond Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-6 Richmond Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Richmond's Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Richwood and Fenwick, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Ridgecrest, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Ridgeley, W.Va. (NAB) 4-39 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Ridgway, Pa. (Elk Creek) (ORP) 26-22 Ridgway and Vicinity, Pa. (On Clarion River) (ORP) 26-22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-9, 17-10 Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-9, 17-10 Ripley, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Ripley, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Ririe Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Rising Sun, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Riverdale, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-47, 1-49 Riverland Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Riverside Area, Pasco, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 I-40 INDEX Riverview, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Roanoak Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-30 Roaring River, N.C. (SAN) 7-16 Roaring River Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Roberts, Ray, Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Rochester, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-21 Rochester, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-10, 32-20, 32-31 Rochester Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Rock Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rock Hall Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Rock Island District (NCD) 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-7 Rock Island Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Rockfish Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Rockingham, Vt. (NED) 1-22 Rockland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Rockland Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-16, 16-20 Rockport, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Rockport and Old Harbors, Mass. 1-8, 1-26, 1-46 Rockport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Rockport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-35, 1-39 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Rocky Fork, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Rocky Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-21, 32-32 Rodeo Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Rogers City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Rogue River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-34 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Rolling Fork Road, Sevier County, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Rollinson Channel, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-29 Rome, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Rome, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Rondout Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-13, 2-25, 2-30 Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-24 Roseau River, Minn. (NCS) 27-14, 27-21 Rosedale Harbor, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Rosendale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Roseville, Ohio (ORH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-18, 25-22 Rosiclare, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-18 Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-8 Rouge River, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-42, 31-54, 31-63 Rough River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19, 24-24, 24-27, 24-30 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, Ky. (ORL) 24-10, 24-16 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Rouseville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Royal River, Maine (NED) 1-8, 1-27, 1-35 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Rudee Inlet, Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-25 Ruffy Brook, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-16, 38-22 Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Rushford, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Russell, Ky. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Russell and Allison Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24 Russell, Richard B., Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Russian River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-14, 35-24, 35-28, 35-34, 35-35 Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Rye Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-22, 15-28, 15-30, 15-35 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff) (SWG) 15-27 Sabula, Iowa (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35, 32-39 Saco, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Saco River, Maine (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35, 1-45, 1-53 Sacramento River, Calif. (CDC) 44-3, 44-5, 44-6, 44-7 I-41 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Sacramento River, Calif. (SPK) 35-2, 35-23, 35-28, 35-33 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (SPK) 35-15, 35-25, 35-28, 35-35, 35-36 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-2, 35-23 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Saginaw River, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-26, 31-42, 31-49, 31-54, 31-56 Saint John River Basin, Maine (NED) 1-20 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-8 Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Sakonnet River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Salamanca, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Salamonie Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-11, 24-16 Salem Church Lake, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Salem Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Salem River, N.J. (NAP) 3-14, 3-21 Salina, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Salinas River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Saline Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Saline River, Ark. (LMK) 12-14 Saline River and Tributaries, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-50 Salkahatchie River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Salmon Creek near Vancouver, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Salmon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Salmon River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Salmon River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Salt Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-15 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Saluda River, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Salyersville, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-17, 16-20 Sammamish River, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-17, 16-20 San Antonio and Chino Creeks Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Antonio Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Antonio Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 San Diego Creek, Alice, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 San Diego Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 San Diego River (Mission Valley), Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-24 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif. (SPL) 33-19 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-6 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK) (SPN) 34-2, 34-6, 35-3, 35-23 San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-8 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift), Calif. (SPN) 34-6 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), Calif. (SPN) 34-8 San Gabriel River, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-17, 16-20 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-19 San Jacinto River Levee and Bautista Creek Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23, 35-33, 35-34 San Juan, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 San Juan Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Juan Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-28, 9-37 San Leandro Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 San Leandro Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif. (SPN) 34-8 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-9, 35-31 San Lorenzo River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 San Luis Rey River, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-9 San Rafael Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Sand Hill River, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Sand Island, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Sand Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Sand Point, Alaska (NPA) 40-16 Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-40 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-21, 32-32 Sandusky River, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Sandy Creek, Jackson, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 I-42 INDEX Sandy Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Sandy River and Sleepy Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Sangamon River (Mouth), Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17, 33-20, 33-24 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif.: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-20 Santa Ana River Main Stem, Calif. (SPL) 33-8 Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-15 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Santa Cruz County, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-7 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-8 Santa Rosa Wash (at Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Santee River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Sapelo Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Sardis, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Sardis Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Sardis Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-11, 19-14, 19-18 Sasanoa River, Maine (NED) 1-40 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Satilla River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 31-23, 31-43, 31-55 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Sauk River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Savage, Md. (NAB) 4-39 Savage River Dam, Md. (NAB) 4-36 Savanna Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Savannah Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-4, 8-6, 8-10, 8-11, 8-14 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River. at Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-17 Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-5, 8-6, 8-11, 8-15 Saw Mill River at Elmsford and Greenburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-19, 2-31 Sawkill Creek, Kingston, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Sawmill Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Saxis Island, Va. (NAO) 5-11, 5-17, 5-21 Saxman, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Saxon Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-43, 31-56 Saxonville, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-51 Saxtons River, Rockingham, Vt. (NED) 1-24 Sayers, Foster Joseph, Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Saylorville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-48 Scarboro River, Maine (NED) 1-40 Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Schuylkill River, Pa. (NAP) 3-9, 3-16, 3-20 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Schuylldll River-Fairmount Park, Pa. 3-8 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Sciotoville, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Scituate Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-40, 1-46, 1-53 Scott, W. Kerr, Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-16, 6-20 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Scotts Creek, S.C. (SAW) 7-7, 7-10, 7-14 Scotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20, 5-25 Scottsville, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Scranton, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Scranton, Buffalo, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-19 Scuppernong River, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-20, 6-25 Sea Bright to Ocean Township, N.J. (NAN) 2-17, 2-25, 2-31 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Searsport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Seaside Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-21 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-30, 1-36, 1-43 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 31-27, 31-45, 31-56, 31-61 Seekonk River, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Selkirk Shore State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Sewage Lagoons, Vale, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17 Seward Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Sewerline Protection, Valley, Ala. (SAM) 10-16, 10-29, 10-39 I-43 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Shad Landing State Park, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Shallotte River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-29 Shark River, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Shawneetown, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-43, 31-56 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-38 Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-50 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-39 Shelburne, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Shell Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Shelley Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Shelton Creek, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Shenango River Lake, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-9, 26-14, 26-20, 26-27 Shepard Road, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Sherburne, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Sheridanf, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-14, 27-21, 27-25 Shidler Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Shields River, near Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-14, 2-25, 2-30 Shipyard River, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-10, 7-13 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Shoals, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Shobe Canyon, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Shooters Island, N.Y. and N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration, Philadelphia, Pa. District (NAP) 3-10 Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-10 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Short Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-19 Shoshone River, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-19 Shot Pouch Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-14, 2-25, 2-30, 2-33 Shufflebarger Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Sid Simpson Project, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Siler City Streams, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-23 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Simpson Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Sioux City Marina, Iowa (MRO) 21-2, 21-10 Sioux Falls, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sistersville, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Sitka Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Siuslaw River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-34, 37-42 Six Runs Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. and Pa. (N) 4-37 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Skagit Creek, Wash. (Avon By-Pass) (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-28, 38-30 Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) (NPS) 38-27 Skagway Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Skagway River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Skamokawa Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34, 37-45 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Skiatook Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-18 Skipanon Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34 Slaughter Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30 Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Chester, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Hamburg, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Smelt Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Smith Creek, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Smith Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Smith Creek, Pamlico County, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Smith Ferry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Smith River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Smithfield, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Smithland, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Smithland Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers (MRK) 20-19 Smyrna River, Del. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Snagging and Clearing Activities Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 New England Division (NED) 1-23 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 I-44 INDEX St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Snake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-28 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash., and Idaho (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12, 39-22 Snettisham, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-12 Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Snoqualmie River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Soap Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Soleduck River Bridge, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Somerville Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-17, 16-20 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Sope Creek, Marietta, Ga. (SAM) 10-16, 10-29, 10-39 Soules Swamp, Whiteville, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Souris River, Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-15, 27-21 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 South Bank Arkansas River, (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark. (SWL) 18-17 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark. Tucker Lakes (SWL) 18-17 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South Beloit, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 South Bristol Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 South Channel, Government Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 South Coventry Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-45 South Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 South Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 South Fork, Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 South Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky. (ORN) 23-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 South Haven Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-43, 31-56 South Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-63 South Orange, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 South Platte River, Adams County, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-6, 21-15 South Platte River, Iliff, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River, Kersey, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, Colo. (MRO) 21-17 South Platte River, Merino, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River, Platteville, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38 South Point, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 South Portsmouth, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-9, 28-15, 28-17 South River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 South River, Conway, Mass. (NED) 1-15, 1-24, 1-29 South River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 South Williamson, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 South Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Southern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-13, 4-32 Southport Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Southport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Southwest Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Southwestern Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Space Programs Laboratory 51-1 Spanish Fork River, Utah (SPK) 35-33 Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-23, 10-30, 10-41 Spirit Lake, Wash. (NPP) 37-14 Spokane, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Spring City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Springdale, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Springer, William L., Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Springfield, S.D., Water Intake (MRO) 21-18 Springfield Canal, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 St. Anthony Falls, Lower Lock and Dam, Minn. (NCD) 29-5, 29-9 St. Anthony Falls, Upper Lock, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-28, 9-37 St. Catherines Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 St. Clair River, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-42, 31-54, 31-58, 31-63 I-45 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 St. Croix River, Maine (NED) 1-39 St. Croix River, Minn. and Wis. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-28, 42-53 St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-18 St. Francis River, Highway 90, Ark. (LMM) 13-6 St. Francis River Levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-49 St. Georges Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-37 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 St. James Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney (SAJ) 9-14, 9-28, 9-37 St. Johns River and Tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45 St. Jones River, Del. (NAP) 3-21, 3-22 St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-42, 31-54 St. Joseph River, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 St. Louis District (NCD) 29-3, 29-4 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-28, 9-37 St. Maries, Idaho (NAS) 38-28 St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 St. Marys, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 St. Marys, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 St. Marys River, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-43, 31-55, 31-59, 31-63 St. Michael Canal, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 St. Michaels Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Patricks Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 St. Paul District (NCD) 29-3, 29-4 St. Paul Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 St. Peters Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-46 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-22, 1-31, 1-37 Stamford Barrier, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Stamford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45 Starlings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Startup, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 State Highway 101 and 401, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. (NCS) 27-15, 27-21 Staten Island, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. Bridge Across Arthur Kill, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Steinhatchee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Stikine River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Stillaguamish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22, 38-25, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-17, 16-21 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, Mont. (NPS) 38-29 Stillwater Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26, 4-32 Stillwater River, Mont. (NPS) 38-29 Stillwell Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Stockton Harbor, Maine (NE) 1-40 Stockton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Stone Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Stonehouse Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Stoner Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-9, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Stonington Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-46 Stonington Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-45; 1-53 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Stratford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project New England Division (NED) 1-23 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 21-9, 21-12, 21-16 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Strong Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-29 Strube Lake - Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Oreg. 37-49 Stuart, Va. (SAW) 6-13, 6-20 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. (NCE) 31-24, 31-43, 31-56 Sturgis, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sucker Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Sugar Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 35-30 I-46 INDEX Suisun Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 35-30 Suisun Point Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-15 Sulphur River Levees, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Summersville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-18 Sumner Parker Airport, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Sun Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Sunbury, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sunken Vessel Removal 48-1 Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-8, 5-16 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-32 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-48 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE) 31-29, 31-45 Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, Pa. (NAB) 4-20 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-34 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-32 Sutton Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-18 Suwannee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, Mo. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Sweetwater Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Sweetwater River, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17 Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Swinomish Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-21 Swoyersville, and Forty Fort, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sykesville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Syracuse, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Syracuse, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 T Table Rock Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-24 Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21, 38-31 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-21 Tahola, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Tahquitz Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-21 Talkeetna River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Tallabinella Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-16, 10-29, 10-39 Tallahala Creek Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-28, 10-38 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Tallapoosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-42 Tallow Hill, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-12 Tamaqua, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-23, 4-21 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Tampa Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-16, 9-28, 9-38 Tangeman, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Tangier Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-8, 5-16, 5-20 Tangipahoa River, La. (LMN) 11-15 Tar River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tar River and Tributaries, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tarentum, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Taskinas Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Taunton River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-44, 31-56 Taylors Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-25 Taylorsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Taylorsville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-11, 24-17 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. (Water Supply) (MR+T) 42-50, 42-59 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Tell City, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Tenants Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Tenasillahe Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16, 19-18 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and Ky. (ORN) 23-3, 23-9, 23-11, 23-17, 23-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Ala. and Miss. (ORN) (SAM) 10-48, 23-4, 23-9, 23-12 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-15, 42-28 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La. (LMK) 12-15 Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge (MR+T) 42-28 Terrain Analysis Center 51-1 Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-16 Terry, David D., Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-19 I-47 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Teton River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Texas City and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-15, 15-25 Texas City Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-24, 15-28 Thames River, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I., and Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-52 The Cascades Canal, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-39 The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-29, 37-38, 37-52 The Island Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Thomaston Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-49 Thoroughfare Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Three Islands Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Three Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Three Rivers, Tex. (SWG) (SWF) 15-27, 16-21 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La. (LMN) 11-15 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Tijuana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34, 37-45 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Tionesta Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Toad Suck Ferry Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-19 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J., and N.Y. (NAP) 3-24 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 Only) Pa. (NAP) 3-24 Todd Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Togiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Toledo Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-21, 32-32 Tolovana River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Tolu, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-15, 25-18 Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-10 Tomahawk Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-19 Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-39 Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Toms River, N.J. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Tongue River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Topeka, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Topographic Laboratory 51-1 Topsail Beach and Surf City, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Toronto Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-18 Torrington, East Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Torrington, West Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Totuskey Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Touchet River, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Towanda Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-17, 16-21 Town Bluff Hydropower, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-21 Town Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Town Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-10, 7-14 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Townshend Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-48 Trabuco Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Tradewater River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Trask River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Treasure Island, Mo. (LMM) 13-6 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation- Restraining Barriers, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Tred Avon River, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-24, 4-31 Trent River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27, 6-28 Trenton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Trexler Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Trim Cane Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Trinidad Lake, Colo. (SWA) 17-5, 17-8 Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-24, 15-28, 15-35 Trinity River Project, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-15, 16-21 Triplett Creek, Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Trotters Shoals Lake (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Troy, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Truckee River and Tributaries, Calif. and Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Truman, Harry S., Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-8, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Trumbull Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-44 Trussville, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-9 Tualatin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 1-48 INDEX Tuckahoe River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-9, 3-16, 3-20 Tucson Diversion Channel, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-11, 33-16 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Tully Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-48 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Turkey Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Turtle Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Tuttle Creek Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15, 20-19 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Twelvemile Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-17, 12-20 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-16, 27-21 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-24, 4-31 Two Harbors, Minn. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-8 Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-24, 31-44, 31-56 Tyaskih Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tybee Island, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-15 Tygart Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-17 Tylers Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Tyrone, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 U Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Umatilla River (Echo), Oreg. (NPP) (NPW) 37-43, 37-44, 39-15 Umpqua River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-35 Umpqua River and Tributaries, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Unadilla, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Union City Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Union Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Union River, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Union Township Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-15 Union Village Dam, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-48 Uniontown, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Uniontown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORL) 22-3, 22-9 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Upper and Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-22 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth (SAM) 10-42 Upper Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Upper Grays River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Upper Iowa River, Iowa (NCS) 27-24 Upper Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Upper Marlboro, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program, Ill., Ia., Minn., Mo., Wis. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Upper Puyallup River, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Upper River Road, Jefferson Co., Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Upper River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Upper White River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Urban Areas at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Urbanna Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 U.S. Highway 11 Bridge, Fosters, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 U.S. Highway 51, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Utica, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Utica, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 V Valdez Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Van Meter, Iowa (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Vanceburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Vaughn, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24, 27-27 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Ventura-Pierpont Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Ventura River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-21, 32-33 Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of Lock) (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Vermillion River, S.D. (MRO) 21-18 Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Verona Lake, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 I-49 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Vevay, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Vicinity of Nehalem, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-29 Victory Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Villa Park Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-21, 33-24 Village Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Village Creek, Jackson - Lawrence Counties, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Village of New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Village of Saxtons, Vt. (NED) 1-44 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-15, 15-25 Vincennes, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Vineyard Haven, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Vinton Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-15 Virginia Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-16, 5-21 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Volga, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 W Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Wabash River Basin, Ind., Ill., and Ohio (ORL) 24-11, 24-19, 24-27, 24-28, 24-30 Wabasha Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 6-27 Waco Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-17, 16-21 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Waikiki Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Waimea Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Waimea River, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36-6 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-8 Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-49 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Wallace, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Wallace Lake, La. (LMK) 12-16, 12-18, 12-20 Wallis Sands State Beach, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Wallisville Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Wallkill River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Wallowa River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Walluski River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Walnut Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-17, 35-25 Walter, Francis E., Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-12, 3-17, 4-21 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-31, 10-41 Walters Slough, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Wappapello Lake, Mo. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-36 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Ware, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-23, 1-44, 1-49 Wareham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Wareham-Marion, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-16, 27-21 Warren River, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warrenton Diking Districts 1, 2, and 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-19, 27-22, 27-25 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Warsaw, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Warwick Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warwick River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Warwood, W. Va. (OPR) 26-22, 26-26 Washington, D.C. and Vicinity (NAB) 4-21, 4-36, 4-39 Washington, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-20 Washington Canal and South River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Washington Harbor, D.C. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Washington Island, Wis. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Washougal Area Levees, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) 53-1 Water Valley, Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 18-18 Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center 53-1 Waterbury, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Waterbury Dam, N.Y. (NAN) 2-20 Waterbury Reservoir, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Wateree River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Waterford, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Waterloo, Iowa (NCR) 28-6, 28-12, 28-17 Waterloo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, S.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-23, 6-29 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22, 38-31 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 I-50 INDEX Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-38 Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-15 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (LMN) 11-5, 11-10, 11-12 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La. (LMN) 11-15 Waterway-Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Waterway on the Coast of Virginia (NAO) 5-8, 5-16, 5-21 Waterways Experiment Station (WES) 45-1 Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 32-39 Watts Bar Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Waukegan Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-5, 30-9, 30-13, 30-14 Waurika Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-18 Waverly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Wax Lake Outlet, La. (MR+T) 42-50 Waycake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Webb District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16 Weber River and Tributaries, Utah (SPK) 35-33 Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16, 39-17 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-8 Wellfleet Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wells Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Wellsville, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-42 West Atchalafaya Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-13 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-33 West Branch, Westfield River, Mass. (NED) 1-44 West Bridgewater, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. (NED) 1-45 West Canaan Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 West Fork, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 West Fork, Foster Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 West Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 West Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 West Hickman Area, Hickman, Ky. (LMM) 13-6 West Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-47 West Kentucky Tributaries, Ky. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-19, 42-28, 42-53 West Magnesia Canyon Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17 West Makinster Road, Wilson River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-16, 37-27, 37-37 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Malvern, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West Nishnabotna River, near Hancock, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38 West Point, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 West Point, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 West Point, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 West Point Lake, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) (SAS) 8-9, 10-24, 10-31, 10-41 West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-22, 1-29, 1-36, 1-44, 1-49 West Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-22 West Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-28, 42-53 West Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 West Thompson Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-31, 1-52 West Union, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 West Warren, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Westchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-15, 2-25, 2-31, 2-38 Westcott Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-44 Western Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Westland District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Weston, Vt. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Weston Mills, Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Weston Mills, Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Westport, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Westport District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45 1-51 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Westport River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Westport Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-44 Westville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-32, 1-52 Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Weymouth Back River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Weymouth-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Weymouth-Fore - Town Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Wheeler Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Wheeler, General Joe, Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wheeling, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 White Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-44, 31-56 White Oak Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-11 White Oak Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 White Oak River, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 White River, Ark. (above Peach Orchard Bluf) (SWL). 18-16 White River, Ark. (below Newport) (LMM) 13-5 White River, Ind. (ORL) 24-19, 24-30 White River at Highway 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 White River Backwater Levees (MR+T) 42-9 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-13, 18-25 White River Basin (Little Rock District), Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 18-7, 18-13, 18-15, 18-24 White River, Jacksonport, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-13 Whitebird Creek, Idaho (NPW) 38-15, 39-16 Whitefish Point, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Whitesburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Whitewater River, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Whitewater River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-22 Whitings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-11, 33-16 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-51 Whitney Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-14, 16-17, 16-21 Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Whitney Point Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Whittier, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-17, 19-18 Wickford Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Wicomico River, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Wilcox, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-28 Wild Rice River, Mahnomen Co., Minn. (NCS) 27-17, 27-21 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. 27-24 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-17, 35-25 Wilders, Ky. (ORL) 24-24 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Willamette Falls Fishladder, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-26, 37-35, 37-45 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-16, 37-37, 37-42, 37-49, 37-50 Willamette River Basin, Oreg.-Bank Protection (NPP) 37-17, 37-27, 37-37, 37-50 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-42 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Willard Beach, South Portland, Me. (NED) 1-42 William H. Harsha Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 William L. Springer Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Williamson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Williamstown, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Williston, N.D., Water Intake (MRO) 21-18 Willoughby Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-28, 37-37 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Willow Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-3, 22-7 Wilmington Harbor, Del. (NAP) 3-8, 3-10, 3-16, 3-20 Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-19, 6-29 Wilmore, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Wilson Branch, Cheraw, S.C. (SAN) 7-8 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-21, 32-33 Wilson Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-7, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Wilson Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Wilson River, Oreg. (NPD) 37-43 Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Winchester Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Winfield Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 1-52 INDEX Winnibigoshish Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-40 Winona, Minn. (NCS) 27-17, 27-21 Winona Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Winooski River, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Winslow (Tributaries of Little Colorado River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-21 Winsted, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Winter Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Winter Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Winthrop Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Winthrop Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-46 Wisconsin River, Wis. (NCS) 27-23 Wishart Point Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Wister Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-18 Withlacoochee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-8, 23-10 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Wood Island Harbor, Biddleford, Maine (NED) 1-40 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Woodbury, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Woodbury Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Woodland St. Bridge, Tenn. (ORN) 23-4 Woodlands, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Woodruff, Jim, Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-23, 10-30, 10-41 Woods Hole Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-42, 37-48 Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-48 Worcester Diversion, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-17 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-17, 16-12, 16-17, 16-21 Wright's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Wrightsville Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Wynoochee Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Wynoochee River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wyoming Valley, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-20, 4-27, 4-33 Y Yadkin River Basin, N.C. - S.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-30 Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River at Union Gap, Wash. (NPS) 38-13 Yakima River, Cle Elum, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPS) (NPW) 38-29, 39-15, 39-17 Yakima River, Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yalobusha River, Miss. (LMR) 12-15 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-26, 37-35 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Yaquina River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Yatesville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-10, 25-15, 25-18 Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-3, 12-9, 12-11 Yazoo River Backwater Area (MR+T) 42-51 Yazoo River Basin, Miss. (MR+T) 42-7, 42-16, 42-28, 42-46, 42-51 Yazoo River Basin Project Levees (MR+T) 42-46, 42-49 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, near Miles City, Mont., Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, near Big Timber, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, near Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yonkers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 York Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-53 York, Indian Rock Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-27, 4-33 York River, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-16, 5-21 York Spit Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-18 Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-21 Youghiogheny River Lake, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Youngs and Klaskanine River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 I-53 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1986 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-45 Youngs River Dikes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Youngstown, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Z Zacate Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Zanesville, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-8 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-19 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 I-54 *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFF ICE:1988-520-682:00104 111111111 1 ?i VIIiI i / ' w4 r' " 'j -'- i ; .: i 1 ,1..1 : , , __ ,,, ' ' \ , i =', ' . . r f . ;__ rt i ; ,j ' 4 1 .- . 1 t } .ter., ' {{ 1 1 ti -, i } C I l ii i l 3 i, . , ., _, f,,- ' ,